MUST -Phase 2 Framework alignment
Live stream not working or buffering in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| You ready? | 00:00:06 | |
| All right. Welcome, everyone. | 00:00:08 | |
| To the July 30th must meeting. | 00:00:10 | |
| We're going to get to a presentation of. | 00:00:13 | |
| A quick presentation from the. | 00:00:15 | |
| Schools here in a minute, I've got a. | 00:00:18 | |
| Brief opening statement that I want to read. | 00:00:22 | |
| Some of this is circling us back and some of this is in response to some stuff that's been put out here recently, so. | 00:00:25 | |
| There seems to be some misunderstanding of the purpose of this task force and the relationships between these different. | 00:00:32 | |
| Taxing units. | 00:00:36 | |
| This task force is a group of representatives working towards suggestions for the state legislature. | 00:00:38 | |
| On how we plan to navigate through the bill that they have given us. | 00:00:43 | |
| The mayor of New Albany seems to think that the county's past clerical mistakes have some sort of bearing on these proceedings. | 00:00:47 | |
| Let me assure him, and anyone else that's concerned about that, that it's simply not the case. | 00:00:51 | |
| The county is in good standing with the state and maintains an A+ rating with S&P. | 00:00:56 | |
| The mayor likes to deflect attention from his policies and lack of transparency and then turn off comments on his post. | 00:01:00 | |
| Nothing new there. | 00:01:05 | |
| The city created transparency portal which is anything but transparent. | 00:01:07 | |
| Citizens are still waiting for financial statements on River Run Water Park. | 00:01:11 | |
| The legal and contractual bills from the Providence Mill Dam and the total cost of the police station and an explanation of why | 00:01:14 | |
| county residents should be paying for part of it through their sewer bills. | 00:01:18 | |
| There's never been any discussion of creating Uniguff style government here in this county. | 00:01:22 | |
| Any reference to such by the mayor is fear mongering. | 00:01:27 | |
| The mayor lobbied me and other and another council member to pass the public safety. | 00:01:30 | |
| Through the county. | 00:01:34 | |
| That is certainly not the reason that it was passed. | 00:01:35 | |
| But for not. | 00:01:38 | |
| For if we do not pass it, the city's public safety. | 00:01:39 | |
| Would be in shambles. | 00:01:41 | |
| The city was so far behind. | 00:01:43 | |
| And competent equipment. | 00:01:44 | |
| That I had to purchase used equipment from neighboring departments. | 00:01:46 | |
| No acknowledgement from the mayor has ever been given to the county. | 00:01:48 | |
| For passage of that public safety lip. | 00:01:52 | |
| We will finish the work that's been started on this must task force. | 00:01:55 | |
| And it is my desire that the city continues to participate. | 00:01:58 | |
| Our governments have no ties or participation in any joint operations. | 00:02:01 | |
| And that's a shame for the taxpayers. | 00:02:05 | |
| Control and power are dangerous things when collected in one office. | 00:02:07 | |
| Let's work together. | 00:02:11 | |
| Just one time in good faith and not care about who gets the credit for the outcome. | 00:02:12 | |
| Thank you. | 00:02:18 | |
| Are you are you speaking? | 00:02:25 | |
| Sorry. | 00:02:28 | |
| All right. Thank you for the opportunity to speak on behalf of the schools. I was asked to do a brief presentation to outline. | 00:02:31 | |
| The effect of the legislation. | 00:02:37 | |
| With us, it's very complex because of the way school funding works and I'll try to simplify it and. | 00:02:39 | |
| Mostly focus on the operations fund. | 00:02:44 | |
| But to do that, you got to have a little bit of global understanding as well. | 00:02:47 | |
| So next slide, Travis? | 00:02:50 | |
| So. | 00:02:54 | |
| This is a report from Policy Analytics. | 00:02:55 | |
| The only slide I added was the last slide. | 00:02:57 | |
| To give context, whatever budget looks like. | 00:02:59 | |
| But what they what they did as part of a larger presentation is they looked at where we stand with our education, operations and | 00:03:02 | |
| operating reference funds, which we do not have an operating referendum fund. | 00:03:07 | |
| And compared us to what we look like across the state. | 00:03:12 | |
| And when you look at the two major fund or the three major funds? | 00:03:14 | |
| To which we have education operations. | 00:03:17 | |
| We're about $400.00 below the state average. | 00:03:20 | |
| A little bit less than 400. | 00:03:23 | |
| So we're currently operating more efficiently. | 00:03:24 | |
| Than the average school district. We don't have an operating referendum which we've not sought, one we try to maintain. | 00:03:27 | |
| Our daily operations within the. | 00:03:33 | |
| Normal operating budgets. | 00:03:36 | |
| Next slide. | 00:03:38 | |
| There's some complexities in this slide. It's only looking at the Levy, not the entire budget, but what we wanted to show on here. | 00:03:42 | |
| Is there's a lot of costs that are out of our control? | 00:03:49 | |
| That we've been experiencing. | 00:03:52 | |
| Double digit increases on. | 00:03:53 | |
| One of those is insurance. | 00:03:55 | |
| A near double digit. | 00:03:57 | |
| Increase on transportation, so for instance buses. | 00:03:59 | |
| A decade ago, ran. | 00:04:03 | |
| About 80 to $90,000. | 00:04:05 | |
| Or pushing $200,000 today without much difference in specs. | 00:04:07 | |
| The cost of steel, cost of production have all gone up, so in some cases we've seen double. | 00:04:10 | |
| And a decade. | 00:04:15 | |
| But a lot of, like I said, a lot of these cost. | 00:04:17 | |
| Utilities, things of that nature we have. | 00:04:19 | |
| Pretty minimal control over. | 00:04:21 | |
| And so we're seeing increases higher than any of our. | 00:04:25 | |
| Budget increases overtime, which means we cut other. | 00:04:28 | |
| Services in order to provide the basics. | 00:04:32 | |
| The next slide. | 00:04:36 | |
| Outlines. | 00:04:37 | |
| Our unfunded credits. | 00:04:38 | |
| Before this year, we would have just seen. | 00:04:40 | |
| A circuit breaker loss and typically our circuit breaker loss which means revenue that. | 00:04:43 | |
| Could have been levied. That's not received. | 00:04:47 | |
| Ran around $1.8 million. | 00:04:50 | |
| As the high. | 00:04:53 | |
| This year we're going to see. | 00:04:54 | |
| The credits and circuit breaker total over 4.4 million. | 00:04:56 | |
| So we've already. | 00:04:59 | |
| Cut the budget and the operations fund. | 00:05:01 | |
| To account for this so we still. | 00:05:03 | |
| Break even cash flow. | 00:05:05 | |
| But that's more than double. | 00:05:07 | |
| The what we would typically see in one year. | 00:05:10 | |
| And so that has nothing to do even with. | 00:05:13 | |
| The discussion of lit that we're here to talk about tonight. So we've been making adjustments. | 00:05:15 | |
| Over the last few years. | 00:05:21 | |
| Where expenses of. | 00:05:23 | |
| Been outstripping. | 00:05:24 | |
| Pacing the the revenue. | 00:05:26 | |
| And then? | 00:05:28 | |
| Additional shortfalls in revenue coming in through this past legislation. | 00:05:29 | |
| Next slide. | 00:05:34 | |
| Shows what we project our. | 00:05:35 | |
| CNAFT to be over the next few years you'll see a decline. | 00:05:37 | |
| Until about 2031, then we. | 00:05:40 | |
| Might see an increase again, but when you take this factor in addition to the. | 00:05:42 | |
| Credits Circuit Breaker. | 00:05:48 | |
| I had an increasing expense as you can see. | 00:05:50 | |
| What we're looking at. | 00:05:52 | |
| From a budget perspective. | 00:05:53 | |
| And so the. | 00:05:56 | |
| The final slide here. | 00:05:56 | |
| Is. | 00:05:58 | |
| Our 2025 revenue and expenditures. | 00:05:59 | |
| So our operations fund. | 00:06:02 | |
| Was around 41 million. | 00:06:04 | |
| With revenue a little bit under 41 million. | 00:06:06 | |
| And our expenditures. | 00:06:08 | |
| Couple 100,000 below that we always try to. | 00:06:10 | |
| Balance or cash flow unless we're doing. | 00:06:12 | |
| One time capital project or something that nature, but we. | 00:06:14 | |
| Right now are within our target cash balances and where we want to be. So we're project we we try to maintain that steady. | 00:06:17 | |
| Cash flow. | 00:06:25 | |
| On the revenue side? | 00:06:27 | |
| The the biggest part of our revenue comes from local property taxes, the levy. | 00:06:28 | |
| Which is usually capped. | 00:06:33 | |
| The last couple years around 4%. I think this year it's going to be 6% after a few years of cap. | 00:06:35 | |
| That's a formula that the state gives on the levy. | 00:06:41 | |
| Part of the revenue and this comes back to 2019 when they took the general fund. | 00:06:44 | |
| And and capital projects fund and and some other funds and split them out into an education revenue education. | 00:06:49 | |
| And operations fund. | 00:06:55 | |
| So the money we get from the state. | 00:06:56 | |
| For the per pupil fundings. | 00:06:59 | |
| More than. | 00:07:01 | |
| What's required to run the education fund because the general fund was larger? | 00:07:02 | |
| And so some of that money every month gets transferred from the education operations fund. Every school does this as part of the | 00:07:06 | |
| operate operations. | 00:07:10 | |
| We can transfer up to 15%. I think last year we transferred 14. I'm down to 12 trying to preserve cash flow in the education fund. | 00:07:15 | |
| But that's why there's a. | 00:07:22 | |
| Back in 2019, that's why that exists as a line now, just because the way the funds work compared to the revenue. | 00:07:24 | |
| Lit which is the. | 00:07:30 | |
| The topic of this. | 00:07:32 | |
| Task Force. | 00:07:34 | |
| Is close to 6% of our budget. It ranges anywhere from 567 percent every year. So we get about $2.4 million. | 00:07:35 | |
| In lit, which is set to expire for us in a couple of years. | 00:07:41 | |
| And then we have some smaller sources of revenue. | 00:07:45 | |
| But it's. | 00:07:47 | |
| And our top three? | 00:07:48 | |
| And that will go from. | 00:07:49 | |
| 2.4. | 00:07:51 | |
| To 0. | 00:07:52 | |
| So basically a Cliff there. | 00:07:53 | |
| So on the right side, outline the expenditures and just kind of tell you sort of what we're doing there. | 00:07:55 | |
| In 2026, our revenues projected to be around 36 million because that previous slide I showed you. So we're matching our | 00:07:59 | |
| expenditures. | 00:08:02 | |
| We've dropped them down to 36 million. | 00:08:05 | |
| Have we done that? Well, the. | 00:08:07 | |
| The biggest piece of it? | 00:08:08 | |
| That middle line capital projects. | 00:08:09 | |
| We have to do almost all capital projects out of bonds. | 00:08:11 | |
| So when you see a project being done, that's typically the operations, that's typically going to be a bond through the debt | 00:08:14 | |
| service fund. | 00:08:17 | |
| Which is one of the few funds that we. | 00:08:21 | |
| We have some local control over. | 00:08:22 | |
| So the biggest expenses we have. | 00:08:25 | |
| Transportation. | 00:08:27 | |
| And facilities personnel, I'd be your bus drivers. | 00:08:28 | |
| Bus aids, custodians, maintenance people. | 00:08:31 | |
| Those are the two biggest drivers of cost in the operations fund. | 00:08:35 | |
| Then we have repairs, materials contracts makes up the third largest. | 00:08:39 | |
| So those contracts might be repair contracts, preventative maintenance contracts, repairs materials budgets. | 00:08:43 | |
| To keep. | 00:08:48 | |
| Our 20 locations. | 00:08:49 | |
| Running on the daily basis. | 00:08:52 | |
| The capital projects for 2026, right, You know, last year was around 13%. This year it's going to be less than 5%. | 00:08:53 | |
| That's the cuts that we were making in order to. | 00:08:59 | |
| The cash flow list and we're always looking at more efficient routing, more efficient. | 00:09:01 | |
| Use of. | 00:09:05 | |
| Personnel, but there's only so far you can cut before. | 00:09:06 | |
| You umm. | 00:09:09 | |
| Stop providing services at a rate people expected. | 00:09:10 | |
| Our utilities costs have increased not as much as some around the state. Our utilities costs around. | 00:09:13 | |
| 10% of the budget. | 00:09:19 | |
| Our Superintendent office HR, payroll business. | 00:09:20 | |
| Around 7 1/2. | 00:09:23 | |
| Custodial contract, that's our outsourced Knight custodian 7%. | 00:09:25 | |
| And then some other miscellaneous cost, whether it be our technology, personnel, technology, software, things of that nature. | 00:09:29 | |
| Round off the bottom there. | 00:09:36 | |
| So. | 00:09:37 | |
| On top of a. | 00:09:38 | |
| About a. | 00:09:39 | |
| 3 to 4 million. | 00:09:40 | |
| Loss that we're seeing now. | 00:09:41 | |
| In addition to sharing money with charter schools and two years. | 00:09:43 | |
| The the loss of lit puts us less revenue. | 00:09:47 | |
| In 2027202029 than what we had in 2023-2024. | 00:09:50 | |
| And with rising costs, you can see that equation doesn't work very well when we were already. | 00:09:55 | |
| Become very efficient. | 00:09:59 | |
| Over time. | 00:10:00 | |
| To account for those previous losses. So we're asking. | 00:10:01 | |
| For consideration to be able to maintain at least. | 00:10:05 | |
| Some of the funding from. | 00:10:08 | |
| The lid as this task force proceeds so. | 00:10:11 | |
| Be glad to take any questions or provide more information. | 00:10:14 | |
| And future meetings. But that's just a real quick. | 00:10:18 | |
| Overview to respect your time and. | 00:10:20 | |
| At least lay a foundation for where we are. | 00:10:22 | |
| So. | 00:10:25 | |
| Anybody have any questions for Mr. St. | 00:10:27 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 00:10:32 | |
| We just need a moment to get set up. | 00:10:41 | |
| We're gonna Oh. | 00:12:10 | |
| Wow, that was great, Andrew. | 00:12:11 | |
| So I have Andrew with me today because if you want. | 00:12:13 | |
| Us to run some scenarios, we certainly can do that. | 00:12:17 | |
| We're really going to start talking about numbers tonight and, um. | 00:12:20 | |
| A proposed lit structure. | 00:12:24 | |
| So I did give you handouts because while this is very tiny and there's a lot on this page, so. | 00:12:27 | |
| What what this is, let me just explain what's on here. So what we did is we looked at the budgets of all the units within the | 00:12:35 | |
| county and we tried to pull out only those budgets that are recurring. | 00:12:40 | |
| So if it was a capital type of fund or a capital dedicated fund or you had capital outlays in your budget, we did try to strip | 00:12:45 | |
| that out because we were trying to figure out. | 00:12:50 | |
| How much local income tax is supporting those recurring budgets? | 00:12:56 | |
| So if you look. | 00:13:01 | |
| In the orange that. | 00:13:03 | |
| Is the budgeted expenditures for 2026. | 00:13:04 | |
| And we can start with the county unit. So the county unit has 54.3 million of budget expenditures. Yes, the county's budget is | 00:13:09 | |
| much, much higher than that. | 00:13:14 | |
| We just pulled out the operating and recurring funds. | 00:13:19 | |
| So if you look all the way across there total budget 54.3 million. Now when we get into the green, we look at OK, So what is the | 00:13:23 | |
| total local income tax distribution that goes to the county unit? | 00:13:29 | |
| And that is? | 00:13:36 | |
| 2424 point 4 million in total. So that includes all of the county units lit. | 00:13:37 | |
| So that really makes up about 45% of recurring costs for the county. So it's a fairly big revenue source for the county. | 00:13:44 | |
| So the far right hand column, kind of the pink or purple columns, those are. | 00:13:53 | |
| Kind of art, illustrative. | 00:13:59 | |
| Tax rate structure, this is you did not. | 00:14:01 | |
| Ask us to do these rates. We did it for you just as an illustration, because we were like, OK, what is it going to take? | 00:14:04 | |
| To have a rate. | 00:14:11 | |
| That is somewhat revenue neutral. | 00:14:12 | |
| So to get. | 00:14:15 | |
| Enough revenue that covers about what what each of these units are bringing in now. I think that's a good place to start. | 00:14:17 | |
| And then? | 00:14:24 | |
| Provided you know, you provide us input and we can run some other scenarios if you wish, but that rate for the county unit. | 00:14:25 | |
| Would be about .6%. | 00:14:32 | |
| To get the county to approximately where they need to be, so not the full 1.2%. | 00:14:35 | |
| For the municipalities, the municipal budgets, Georgetown has a. | 00:14:42 | |
| A recurring budget of about 1.3 million. | 00:14:46 | |
| Lit distributions for 2026 is about 434,000, which represents about 30, almost 34%. | 00:14:50 | |
| Of the budgeted expenses for Georgetown. | 00:14:59 | |
| And so if we look at all the municipalities combined, that would take about a 1.03% for all of the municipalities combined. Now we | 00:15:03 | |
| did assume. | 00:15:08 | |
| That Georgetown and New Albany would opt in. | 00:15:13 | |
| That's just a scenario. We can also have a scenario where one or both opt out. But again, we needed a place to start, a place | 00:15:16 | |
| where you can start considering what you might feel is best for the county. | 00:15:22 | |
| Greenfield or Greenville? | 00:15:29 | |
| Town. | 00:15:31 | |
| That it's about a $264,000 budget. | 00:15:32 | |
| Greenville gets a distribution of 28,200, which is roughly 11% of. | 00:15:36 | |
| There are recurring costs. | 00:15:43 | |
| That 1.03% county wide municipal rate would generate almost 800,000 for Greenville. That's quite a bit more than what they're | 00:15:45 | |
| getting now, but here's the deal with that county wide. | 00:15:51 | |
| Municipal rate, you can't. | 00:15:57 | |
| Do different rates for different municipalities? It's one rate. | 00:15:59 | |
| And then it gets divided up. | 00:16:03 | |
| Why it gets divided up or allocated to the municipalities based primarily on population? | 00:16:04 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:16:10 | |
| The way I understood it was. | 00:16:14 | |
| If any of the municipalities. | 00:16:16 | |
| Opted in. | 00:16:19 | |
| That. | 00:16:20 | |
| Even the county would be at the same rate. | 00:16:21 | |
| Can there be two different rates .6 and 1.03 so. | 00:16:23 | |
| That .6 is just the county's portion. | 00:16:26 | |
| Of that, OK. | 00:16:30 | |
| And I think actually that 24.4 million is that the counties. | 00:16:31 | |
| And the municipal portion combined. | 00:16:35 | |
| Yeah, that's inclusive about. So let me just explain that because it is a bit confusing. | 00:16:37 | |
| .6 is the county services rate. | 00:16:42 | |
| And then .03 is the county wide municipal rate, your shares of both of those combined is the 24.4 million. | 00:16:45 | |
| Yeah, I probably should have put it down under the municipalities because really that. | 00:16:53 | |
| You you get 2 shares. | 00:16:58 | |
| So we would be adopting a a rate in this scenario of 1.03. | 00:17:00 | |
| Yes, for the municipal right. | 00:17:04 | |
| And then .6 for the county services. Those are two different routes. | 00:17:06 | |
| OK, now we go down to the city of New Albany, again just looking at recurring cost about 48.3 million. | 00:17:11 | |
| Their total lit distribution is 21.95 million. | 00:17:20 | |
| So sort of like the county, about 45% of those recurring costs are local income tax. So that's a pretty big chunk. | 00:17:25 | |
| And again if the if they opt. | 00:17:35 | |
| Into the county wide rate. | 00:17:37 | |
| Their distribution would be about 22.1 million. | 00:17:39 | |
| Which is close to what they have now. So again. | 00:17:44 | |
| There's going to be winners, losers, etc. But. | 00:17:48 | |
| Trying to get. | 00:17:50 | |
| Kind of a revenue neutral rate for these municipalities and the county. | 00:17:52 | |
| Now we can drop down to the Township, so. | 00:17:58 | |
| Remember that. | 00:18:01 | |
| Each. | 00:18:02 | |
| Non municipal unit type. | 00:18:03 | |
| We can't go over .05%. | 00:18:05 | |
| So looking at the townships, we of course looked at all their budgets townships provide. | 00:18:09 | |
| Township Administration. | 00:18:14 | |
| Public assistance. | 00:18:17 | |
| Cemeteries and in this county, no more fire because we're we know now that you're all consolidated. | 00:18:19 | |
| So you can just see how much is provided in Township administration. If we look at all those townships combined, it's about | 00:18:27 | |
| 518,000. | 00:18:31 | |
| Public assistance. All of those townships combined about 255,000. | 00:18:35 | |
| Cemeteries. | 00:18:41 | |
| 55,500 or 58,500? | 00:18:42 | |
| So then if you look across to how much local income tax is getting distributed to each of these townships? | 00:18:46 | |
| $15,073 is distributed to Franklin Township. Well, that. | 00:18:53 | |
| Is. | 00:18:58 | |
| More than what they need to fund all of their services combined. And by the way, Franklin Township is. | 00:18:59 | |
| One of those townships. | 00:19:04 | |
| That will likely require. | 00:19:06 | |
| Merger. | 00:19:08 | |
| I think these other three townships, not excluding New Albany, but Georgetown, Greenville and Lafayette. | 00:19:09 | |
| They are scoring points there. I don't have a final point count, but. | 00:19:15 | |
| They could be close to having to merge as well. | 00:19:20 | |
| But Franklin Township, definitely. | 00:19:23 | |
| So total lit. | 00:19:26 | |
| Again. | 00:19:28 | |
| 228% of what Franklin Township needs under the illustrative formula 17,500 should they be required to merge. | 00:19:29 | |
| Depending on who they merge with, that 17,500 would merge in with that other with the Township. | 00:19:39 | |
| Or with the merging entity. | 00:19:44 | |
| Georgetown Township. | 00:19:46 | |
| They get. | 00:19:48 | |
| 24,810 that's about 26% of their total budget. | 00:19:49 | |
| Under the .03% scenario they would get 126,000, so that's a lot more than what they're getting now. | 00:19:54 | |
| Greenville Township. | 00:20:02 | |
| They're getting $284 of local income tax. Under the .03% scenario it would be about 86,000. | 00:20:04 | |
| Lafayette Township is getting $10,375, about 25% of their budget. | 00:20:14 | |
| Under the new scenario about 93,000. | 00:20:20 | |
| And then New Albany Township. | 00:20:24 | |
| They're currently getting about 21.4%. | 00:20:26 | |
| Of their budget is is lit certified shares which is 136,551. | 00:20:32 | |
| So again, we've got that at point. | 00:20:37 | |
| Oh 3% which is lower than what the Max is do all. | 00:20:40 | |
| Townships have to be on the same rate. | 00:20:44 | |
| Yes, because we what the Council will do is adopt one rate. | 00:20:46 | |
| And then that will be distributed to the townships based on their population. | 00:20:50 | |
| And we could run a scenario to to do a lower rate to see if that would. | 00:20:56 | |
| If that would still work, but I think what we were trying to do is make sure that. | 00:21:02 | |
| Franklin Township didn't drop below their current rate, but if they're going to be merged anyway, it probably is not. | 00:21:06 | |
| And this doesn't take into account. | 00:21:13 | |
| Cash on hand in the Township or anything and that's what why we really tried to focus on recurring costs because cash on hand, you | 00:21:16 | |
| know, typically just use that for one time expenditures, capital and things, but. | 00:21:21 | |
| There if you want. | 00:21:27 | |
| The cash balances, we can bring that next meeting because we have that as well. | 00:21:29 | |
| What we're finding with. | 00:21:32 | |
| With the townships is there's. | 00:21:34 | |
| There's no more capital. | 00:21:36 | |
| Unless they are moving into a new building or. | 00:21:37 | |
| Yeah, and that's why some townships have. | 00:21:40 | |
| Relatively large cash reserves. | 00:21:43 | |
| Because they they aren't spending. | 00:21:45 | |
| That. | 00:21:47 | |
| And they are required by law to prepare our capital improvement plan and that's continuing for this year as well. | 00:21:49 | |
| And quite frankly, if they. | 00:21:57 | |
| Meet certain criteria to. | 00:21:59 | |
| Criteria. They are supposed to. | 00:22:01 | |
| Provide monies to the municipality and or county for infrastructure improvements. | 00:22:03 | |
| If they're not using the money. | 00:22:11 | |
| OK, so now we move down to the library. There's only one library here. | 00:22:13 | |
| Their budget is 5.2 million roughly. | 00:22:18 | |
| The lid that they receive is 1,163,000. That's about 22% of their budget. | 00:22:22 | |
| Again, we could have set a rate at point O 5, but at. | 00:22:29 | |
| .04%. | 00:22:32 | |
| That will generate about what they're getting now, which is about $1.2 million. | 00:22:34 | |
| You also have two special districts here. | 00:22:41 | |
| In the county that get certified shares lit, so we had to look at those as well. | 00:22:44 | |
| So New Albany flood control, their budget is 3.9 million. | 00:22:49 | |
| They currently get. | 00:22:53 | |
| $1,026,000 of LIT, which is roughly 26% of their budget. | 00:22:55 | |
| If the county adopts a point. | 00:23:02 | |
| Percent rate for special districts. | 00:23:05 | |
| That would generate about 1,032,000, so pretty close to what they're getting now. | 00:23:08 | |
| Floyd County solid waste. | 00:23:14 | |
| The budget is for 488,000 roughly. | 00:23:15 | |
| They only get about 4% of their budget, which is about $20,000. | 00:23:19 | |
| From local income tax at a .04% rate, they would get more, obviously at 182,000. | 00:23:24 | |
| The schools, you heard from them, we, we actually combined the operations and education. But if you just look at operations, you | 00:23:32 | |
| heard the school say it was a $40.6 million budget. | 00:23:37 | |
| They get. | 00:23:43 | |
| Lit distributions of 2.4 million, which would be about 5.7% of a $40.6 million. If you add in education, it's like. | 00:23:44 | |
| Less than 2%, but regardless that that's a pretty big chunk. | 00:23:53 | |
| For revenue to get from local income tax. | 00:23:58 | |
| You this is not in the statue, but we were trying to determine, OK, what rate would the Council need to adopt if it were allowed? | 00:24:01 | |
| So that the school could get a distribution that is equal. | 00:24:09 | |
| Approximately equal to what they're getting now, and that would be .08%. | 00:24:13 | |
| I have other MUS committees that. | 00:24:18 | |
| Are working in a rate. | 00:24:20 | |
| For the school and they will include that in the report. That doesn't mean you have to do that, but. | 00:24:22 | |
| Realizing it's not in the current statute. | 00:24:26 | |
| But if it's something you feel strongly about, we can certainly work that into the overall plan. | 00:24:29 | |
| And then finally is the fire and EMS. We have the Floyd County Fire Protection territory. | 00:24:36 | |
| This budget that you see of $13 million, that is a projected budget for 2027 because that's when that full county wide fire | 00:24:42 | |
| territory will be in effect. | 00:24:47 | |
| We did look at what? | 00:24:53 | |
| Lit they are currently receiving now which is about 2.7 million, so that's 21% of their. | 00:24:55 | |
| Budget New Albany Fire Department. | 00:25:00 | |
| The budget is 8.6 million. | 00:25:04 | |
| Which is funded primarily out of the general fund. | 00:25:07 | |
| So we. | 00:25:11 | |
| I mean, you could say that some of the going into the general fund is going to the fire department, but since it's not directly | 00:25:14 | |
| distributed to fire. | 00:25:18 | |
| We didn't show it here because we showed it up in the New Albany line item. | 00:25:21 | |
| So technically, there's not a direct distribution of local income tax to the New Albany Fire Department, but. | 00:25:26 | |
| If the council would adopt the .4% which is the maximum for fire and EMS. | 00:25:33 | |
| Then the Floyd County fire territory would get 6.4 million. | 00:25:39 | |
| And New Albany Fire Department would get 5.7 million, and that's above and beyond what New Albany City would get in their | 00:25:43 | |
| distribution for their civil funds. | 00:25:48 | |
| So if you look at the combined rate of just this illustration, you're at 2.22%. | 00:25:54 | |
| The current county rate is 1.79%. | 00:26:00 | |
| So it's just over the current. | 00:26:04 | |
| County rate. | 00:26:07 | |
| So I know that's a lot of information, but I think. | 00:26:09 | |
| We're at the point now where. | 00:26:12 | |
| We kind of need to get feedback from the task force as to. | 00:26:14 | |
| Are you looking to have a neutral rate? Like do you want to keep it at 1.79%? | 00:26:18 | |
| Do you want to try to keep the revenue neutral, which is what we've? | 00:26:24 | |
| Provided in this illustration. | 00:26:28 | |
| Do you want to take a closer look at any one of these? | 00:26:31 | |
| Like, you know, Andrews here, we can run a few scenarios and we can actually put them up on the screen if that's helpful. | 00:26:35 | |
| We're just at that point where we really need to have some open discussion as to what you think. | 00:26:42 | |
| I think you 2 are probably OK with everything you're seeing. | 00:26:52 | |
| Great. | 00:26:55 | |
| I mean it's. | 00:26:58 | |
| It's umm. Those numbers are impressive. | 00:27:01 | |
| For the town in Georgetown for sure, yeah. | 00:27:04 | |
| I don't know if you want to see any scenarios run Linda or he want to. | 00:27:08 | |
| Do you have a scenario for opt out as well tonight? | 00:27:14 | |
| Do you want to run through this first? | 00:27:17 | |
| We absolutely can. | 00:27:19 | |
| For the county, I think. | 00:27:21 | |
| Just for the county, I think this looks. | 00:27:24 | |
| About where we want to be. | 00:27:28 | |
| You know, maybe just a few. | 00:27:30 | |
| A few tweaks, but overall, you know, we're we're. | 00:27:33 | |
| Definitely in the ballpark for. | 00:27:37 | |
| Where we want to be moving forward. | 00:27:39 | |
| But I don't know if you want to see anything different. | 00:27:41 | |
| On this scenario. | 00:27:43 | |
| Any numbers change and see what they look like or. | 00:27:45 | |
| So Andrew, Are you ready to show or do we need to give you a few minutes? Are you ready to show what that summary page would look | 00:27:50 | |
| like if we had New Albany opt out? | 00:27:56 | |
| OK. | 00:28:06 | |
| And and so we have it up on the screen. I don't. Can you guys see the screen? Oh, you can. OK, Perfect. Perfect. | 00:28:07 | |
| OK, so I'm seeing this. | 00:28:14 | |
| I can. | 00:28:18 | |
| Would you like to go through it, Andrew? | 00:28:20 | |
| OK there. Thank you. Because he knows how old I am so. | 00:28:23 | |
| All right, so. | 00:28:26 | |
| If. | 00:28:28 | |
| If New Albany opts out, let's just start there. So at 1.2%. | 00:28:29 | |
| If New Albany opts out and adopts their own rate at 1.2%, that would give them 11 million 192,672. | 00:28:33 | |
| So that's about half. | 00:28:44 | |
| Of what they're getting now, so here. But here's how it affects the municipalities Georgetown would get. | 00:28:46 | |
| 450,000 where we had. | 00:28:52 | |
| Did it really change that much? | 00:28:58 | |
| Just looking, the previous was. | 00:29:02 | |
| Oh, I see. I'm sorry. | 00:29:06 | |
| Oh gosh. Yeah, OK. | 00:29:09 | |
| Yep, Yep, Yep. | 00:29:12 | |
| So under this scenario, if New Albany opts out and we're still trying to keep the revenue neutral, then that would be a rate of | 00:29:14 | |
| .16% for the municipal. What is the county share of that? It is 2,754,000. | 00:29:22 | |
| So yeah, there's some big differences there. Greenville, but still Greenville and Georgetown, you're still getting more. I mean, | 00:29:33 | |
| Georgetown not so much more, but you're still getting more than what you got before. | 00:29:38 | |
| The rate does come down, it's .16% for the municipal. | 00:29:44 | |
| And the New Albany is at 1.2. | 00:29:50 | |
| So if we look at the county, the counties the county services share should still be the same at 18.2 million. | 00:29:53 | |
| But now the the municipal lit portion is 2.7. | 00:30:01 | |
| So that is about what? | 00:30:05 | |
| Yeah, about 4 million or 3,000,000 less or something like that. | 00:30:09 | |
| We kept the rate the same at .6% for the county portion. | 00:30:15 | |
| The score, we kept the same, everything else is the same. So where are we at? | 00:30:18 | |
| Andrew, we're at 2.39%. | 00:30:23 | |
| The Albany rate would be 2.39. | 00:30:28 | |
| But the other people would pay how much? | 00:30:30 | |
| 1.35%. | 00:30:34 | |
| So do you understand that this is there's so many moving parts? So if I live in the city of New Albany under the scenario. | 00:30:36 | |
| I would pay a rate of 2.39%. If I live anywhere else in the county, I would pay a rate of 1.35%. | 00:30:43 | |
| Under this scenario that I handed out. | 00:30:52 | |
| Everyone in the county would pay 2.22%. | 00:30:55 | |
| The only time there's going to be a difference in tax rates based on where you live is if. | 00:31:00 | |
| One of the municipalities opt out, and the only two municipalities that can opt out is Georgetown and New Albany. | 00:31:05 | |
| Does that make sense? | 00:31:13 | |
| So maybe we talk about what do you think about the school rate? | 00:31:20 | |
| Do you do you like that in your plan? | 00:31:24 | |
| I know I feel like I'm really putting you on the spot, but. | 00:31:29 | |
| It's just things that we need to discuss. | 00:31:31 | |
| Yeah, I mean, I thought. | 00:31:34 | |
| For us, I think it'll be. | 00:31:35 | |
| Something that we definitely consider and OK. | 00:31:37 | |
| Will help out. | 00:31:42 | |
| And their budget is twice what ours is. | 00:31:45 | |
| But I I I think. | 00:31:50 | |
| You know from speaking to some. | 00:31:51 | |
| Other members on our council that. | 00:31:53 | |
| It's definitely something we want to look at. | 00:31:55 | |
| OK. And remember this is non binding. I'm not and we're not asking you to vote tonight either where I'm just trying to figure out | 00:31:57 | |
| what type of plan you would like for us to draw up so that we can get to a. | 00:32:02 | |
| Position where you would want to vote. | 00:32:08 | |
| And you don't even have to vote in favor if you don't want. It's just. | 00:32:10 | |
| We need to develop a plan. | 00:32:14 | |
| So then let's OK, so the schools unless. | 00:32:15 | |
| There's any objection? We'll just keep moving forward under that scenario. | 00:32:19 | |
| Fire in EMS. | 00:32:24 | |
| It's at the Max at .4%. Do you want to see a different scenario? | 00:32:26 | |
| Something lower. We were talking in .2 OK previously. | 00:32:31 | |
| OK. | 00:32:34 | |
| Would probably be. Do you have somebody that would like to speak? | 00:32:36 | |
| Are you OK with? Yeah, sure. I just wanted to make a. | 00:32:40 | |
| Clarification. | 00:32:43 | |
| The numbers that Baker Tilly has pulled for fire EMS for the fire territory are only for fire suppression services. | 00:32:45 | |
| We've entered into an interlocal with the county. | 00:32:52 | |
| To also take responsibility for providing all of the EMS services. | 00:32:54 | |
| For the county starting January 1st. | 00:32:58 | |
| So the total number for the territory, we're going to run it as two separate divisions, but it's one bucket of money. As far as | 00:33:01 | |
| the budget, it's going to be closer to 16.5. | 00:33:05 | |
| So we had budgeted and planned on an agreement with the. | 00:33:10 | |
| Council that the EMS portion of that which is about 4.5 million. | 00:33:14 | |
| Would be covered by lit. | 00:33:19 | |
| Or some other? | 00:33:22 | |
| Revenue stream from the. | 00:33:23 | |
| From the county so we're. | 00:33:24 | |
| We could definitely look at .3 and. | 00:33:25 | |
| And see where that and then. | 00:33:28 | |
| Part of the agreement also. | 00:33:30 | |
| I want you to think I'm making this up. | 00:33:31 | |
| We agreed with the county that we would provide the EMS services, we would provide the revenue to provide the EMS services and | 00:33:34 | |
| that we would tap the lit. | 00:33:38 | |
| To offset the property tax. | 00:33:42 | |
| Bill that the citizens are paying. | 00:33:44 | |
| So the intent and discussions nothing was agreed to was that if the Council went forward with .4. | 00:33:46 | |
| It would give us roughly about this six and a half million in. | 00:33:52 | |
| 4 1/2 would pay for the EMS. | 00:33:56 | |
| 2,000,000 would subsidized the fire service, which would lower the property tax bill for the community. | 00:33:58 | |
| By a commensurate amount. | 00:34:04 | |
| We did that this year. | 00:34:05 | |
| The first creation of the territory. | 00:34:07 | |
| We lowered the. | 00:34:10 | |
| Levy by an amount equal to the amount of lit that we got this year. | 00:34:11 | |
| So our intent was that we would try and help out the community by lowering that property tax bill. | 00:34:16 | |
| By sharing some of that burden with the lip. | 00:34:21 | |
| So if you go something other than .4. | 00:34:23 | |
| That's not what we've been talking about, and we'd have to kind of figure out how we would handle that. | 00:34:26 | |
| So I just want to make sure because. | 00:34:30 | |
| I don't think you guys knew about that. | 00:34:31 | |
| No, I I think there's conversations with primarily between the fire territory and the commissioners, not necessarily the council. | 00:34:34 | |
| Yeah. | 00:34:37 | |
| I'm not sure which is fine. | 00:34:41 | |
| But we don't have that information. We can't well. | 00:34:44 | |
| Commissioner Sharp called me yesterday. | 00:34:48 | |
| And was speaking to that. | 00:34:51 | |
| OK, but he did not. | 00:34:53 | |
| Tie it all together for me so. | 00:34:55 | |
| I apologize that. | 00:34:59 | |
| No worries. No, that's why we're having these meetings so good. | 00:35:00 | |
| So do you still want to see the .3? You can. | 00:35:06 | |
| Plug it in at .3. | 00:35:10 | |
| Just just so we can see it. Yeah. No, sure I understand. | 00:35:12 | |
| There we go. It's up on the screen, so yeah. | 00:35:17 | |
| .3 would generate about $4.8 million. | 00:35:20 | |
| For the fire territory and 4.3 roughly for the city of New Albany. | 00:35:25 | |
| OK. I think more important for. | 00:35:38 | |
| The county is reaching a balance between. | 00:35:40 | |
| Our our total. | 00:35:43 | |
| We're not. | 00:35:47 | |
| Not as concerned about. | 00:35:49 | |
| The different buckets, just the overall total so. | 00:35:51 | |
| 6.4 and we're at. | 00:35:54 | |
| .6 and I think we're. | 00:35:56 | |
| Pretty well on target for. | 00:35:58 | |
| Staying well under the Max where we want to be. | 00:36:00 | |
| Umm, with some tweaks we might be able to get into a. | 00:36:04 | |
| You know, .9 or something but. | 00:36:08 | |
| Well, I think someplace we might be able to tweak. | 00:36:10 | |
| Is the townships. | 00:36:14 | |
| Don't you agree, Andrew? | 00:36:16 | |
| Because I know we did the point O 3% so that. | 00:36:18 | |
| Franklin Township wouldn't drop below. | 00:36:22 | |
| What they're getting now, however. | 00:36:25 | |
| They will likely. | 00:36:30 | |
| Merge so. | 00:36:32 | |
| And the other town, the townships are getting quite a bit more. | 00:36:34 | |
| Than what they're getting now, so wonder if we tried? | 00:36:38 | |
| I don't know .01%. | 00:36:42 | |
| OK, there we go. So that would be. | 00:36:53 | |
| So yes, Franklin will drop down, but again, they're probably going to end up merging, so Georgetown's getting. | 00:36:57 | |
| 42,000 versus 24,000. Greenville's getting 20. | 00:37:04 | |
| 8000 versus $284, it's still still beneficial. I think that's as low as we can go as .01. | 00:37:08 | |
| So what do you all think about that? | 00:37:16 | |
| I'm good with that. | 00:37:23 | |
| Right. I mean they're. | 00:37:24 | |
| And we'll know before then. | 00:37:26 | |
| Yeah, they're going to merge, but they they most likely will be merging, probably with Georgetown. | 00:37:28 | |
| Umm. | 00:37:33 | |
| We can read, you know. | 00:37:37 | |
| Look at their books too to see. | 00:37:38 | |
| Cash on hand, but. | 00:37:40 | |
| We're talking about $10,000 difference their their budgets not. | 00:37:41 | |
| Extensive. Anyway. No, their budgets only $6600 and that really is just all Township administration, right? | 00:37:46 | |
| And that's the way with most townships other than New Albany towns, yeah. | 00:37:55 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:37:59 | |
| Right. I mean, it's possible the other townships might have to merge as well. Yeah, so. | 00:37:59 | |
| Greenville Lafayette may merge as well. | 00:38:04 | |
| But. | 00:38:08 | |
| I like that scenario OK. | 00:38:11 | |
| Everybody but. | 00:38:13 | |
| Franklin is. | 00:38:14 | |
| Still ahead of where they currently are. | 00:38:15 | |
| By decent margins, so. | 00:38:18 | |
| OK. | 00:38:22 | |
| OK. | 00:38:23 | |
| All right. So the special districts, I think that's pretty. | 00:38:25 | |
| Well, at least the flood control is going to be pretty close to what they're getting now, and that's at .04%. You can't. | 00:38:32 | |
| Go above .05%. | 00:38:38 | |
| Any any thoughts there on the special districts for the solid waste and the flood control? | 00:38:42 | |
| Dollar basis to district, right. So the only one that would be addressed flood control and that's primarily developing city. | 00:38:49 | |
| So the solid waste doesn't doesn't need anymore. OK, I know you said that the last time and I just. | 00:38:58 | |
| It was strange that they still have a budget, but but they're dissolved at the end of this year. So they were absorbed by the | 00:39:05 | |
| county in February by coordinates. OK, beginning of the year they had their own district, their own gotcha, gotcha. | 00:39:12 | |
| OK, it's been a really fun year. | 00:39:19 | |
| So that said. | 00:39:22 | |
| Andrew, we could drop that rate then. | 00:39:24 | |
| I don't know what if it's like .02 because if you're only needing to fund. | 00:39:28 | |
| When you say absorb, does that mean the county needs some money? | 00:39:33 | |
| Now supports their own solid waste program. So they're they're back to being at county department, OK. | 00:39:40 | |
| OK. | 00:39:46 | |
| Yeah, I noticed that. I didn't know why they were getting lit. | 00:39:50 | |
| Last question, OK. | 00:39:53 | |
| Acid war because when I do that I open up what you need. | 00:39:55 | |
| It's awful. | 00:39:59 | |
| So at this point, it's supported by county budget, so any county. | 00:40:01 | |
| Rate that we choose is going to help cover that and right now we're covering. | 00:40:05 | |
| OK, perfect. Well then I think we can reduce that. | 00:40:09 | |
| Oh, yeah, true. OK. | 00:40:14 | |
| Perfect. | 00:40:16 | |
| So what do you think, Andrew? | 00:40:18 | |
| Yes. | 00:40:21 | |
| Yes. | 00:40:24 | |
| Mm-hmm. | 00:40:25 | |
| Coming out a little short. Oh, it is. | 00:40:39 | |
| Yeah, I see that. | 00:40:41 | |
| OK. | 00:40:48 | |
| I see. | 00:40:51 | |
| So that's too much of A drop. So .04% it looks like would. | 00:40:51 | |
| Be the neutral. | 00:40:55 | |
| OK, so we're just kind of working our way up here. We are at the library. | 00:41:00 | |
| I think we're pretty close to neutral there. Any thoughts on the library at .04%? | 00:41:06 | |
| Perfect. | 00:41:13 | |
| Is that good? | 00:41:14 | |
| Oh, OK, good. | 00:41:17 | |
| OK. Thanks for coming by the way. | 00:41:20 | |
| I'm going to move to the county unit. | 00:41:23 | |
| I know we do need to look at and I'm sorry I didn't bring that with me tonight, but I can get it to you after this meeting is. | 00:41:26 | |
| The county asked. | 00:41:32 | |
| You know how much? | 00:41:34 | |
| Money are we losing because of circuit breaker? | 00:41:35 | |
| And I don't know if you have that Andrew pulled up like. | 00:41:39 | |
| Like I guess I'm. | 00:41:43 | |
| I know we I just presented the FSP. | 00:41:45 | |
| I guess what my point? | 00:41:49 | |
| Is with us and you probably can't answer it today, but. | 00:41:51 | |
| You know the .6% is going to. | 00:41:54 | |
| Give you roughly what you're getting now. | 00:41:57 | |
| I guess the county will need to consider do you want to do? | 00:42:00 | |
| To make up for any revenue loss due to circuit breaker, but I will tell you this that we do anticipate that after 2030 circuit | 00:42:05 | |
| Breakers are going to start coming down. | 00:42:09 | |
| Umm, so I don't know how much you would really need to make up with the slit. | 00:42:16 | |
| But that is going to need to be a consideration. And because I don't have those numbers with me, you're not going to be able to | 00:42:21 | |
| get a picture of that unless Andrew can. | 00:42:25 | |
| Find that information. | 00:42:29 | |
| That total there under the 2030 estimated lead does that that that includes both the share of the municipal and the county | 00:42:32 | |
| services, yes. | 00:42:36 | |
| Yes, yes it is. It's both. | 00:42:40 | |
| Yeah. | 00:42:42 | |
| And again, it also depends if. | 00:42:47 | |
| The city OPS in or out? | 00:42:49 | |
| Because actually, if the city. | 00:42:51 | |
| Out, you're not even going to get. | 00:42:55 | |
| What you're getting now at .6, So we would have to. | 00:42:58 | |
| Of that. So I guess I'm going to move to the city now and. | 00:43:01 | |
| This I am going to put people in the spot and I guess you don't have to answer, that's up to you, but. | 00:43:05 | |
| We kind of need to know Georgetown, are you going to opt in or out at least just part of this plan? Again, non binding. | 00:43:09 | |
| Oh, I I think that we would opt in. OK, But New Albany, you don't, you don't probably don't know yet. | 00:43:16 | |
| OK. | 00:43:22 | |
| All right, so. | 00:43:24 | |
| We are. | 00:43:25 | |
| If we're going to develop a final plan, we will have to know something at some point. | 00:43:26 | |
| Or what I can do is. | 00:43:32 | |
| What we can do, but curtility, is prepare a plan where New Albany opts in, New Albany opts out, and then you vote. | 00:43:34 | |
| On one of those two plans. | 00:43:40 | |
| Oh, I'm sorry. | 00:43:44 | |
| Hello. | 00:43:44 | |
| Hi, I'm Oscar Gutierrez. | 00:43:45 | |
| Battery Consulting mutual advisor to New Albany. | 00:43:49 | |
| Our first meeting, we're catching up. We did run scenarios for. | 00:43:53 | |
| What it would look like for? | 00:43:57 | |
| New Albany to opt out. | 00:43:59 | |
| We have not. | 00:44:01 | |
| Had anything to go by to run a population based scenario? | 00:44:02 | |
| So I think before. | 00:44:07 | |
| Anything presents the mayor for a recommendation. Would like to. | 00:44:09 | |
| Work with Page directly to come up with a recommendation for the mayor. | 00:44:12 | |
| One of the things that. | 00:44:17 | |
| You know, I think we would also like to see as. | 00:44:19 | |
| The assessed values for all county for all county units. | 00:44:21 | |
| Going down as a result of SB1. | 00:44:25 | |
| That will have an effect beyond your circuit breaker. Circuit breaker will level off, but. | 00:44:28 | |
| Once the avenue stabilized, but. | 00:44:33 | |
| You know, I think one of the scenarios that. | 00:44:36 | |
| We will. | 00:44:38 | |
| Want to look at? | 00:44:38 | |
| For property tax. | 00:44:40 | |
| Replacement. This addresses lid replacement. We would like to see something that addresses lid replacement. | 00:44:43 | |
| But. | 00:44:50 | |
| We'll evaluate this and and get back to the group and obviously we will be. | 00:44:51 | |
| Cooperating to. | 00:44:55 | |
| Work with them. | 00:44:56 | |
| Is this something we think we can do before the next meeting? | 00:44:58 | |
| When is the next meeting? | 00:45:01 | |
| Is it next Thursday? | 00:45:04 | |
| Yeah, yeah, we. | 00:45:07 | |
| We can, but no promises. But yeah, obviously we we have to look at their assumptions and we, we have, we could we have a. | 00:45:10 | |
| So the next two Thursdays and then we have a two week gap and then we're scheduled. | 00:45:18 | |
| So in a month from now, it's gonna be the final. | 00:45:25 | |
| Correct. | 00:45:27 | |
| Yeah. We're not trying to finalize, no. | 00:45:28 | |
| We'll make ourselves available to make utility to. | 00:45:33 | |
| To run numbers and trying to have a recommendation for the mayor. | 00:45:36 | |
| And last question. | 00:45:43 | |
| Would there be any merit or usefulness in looking at the 2025 budget? | 00:45:45 | |
| You know, 2026 was unusual because of the new safety income taxes. Suddenly a value occurred. | 00:45:50 | |
| Until 20262025. | 00:45:57 | |
| You know, may look different now. | 00:45:59 | |
| I don't know what you know. You said these recurring expenses, what non recurring expenses? | 00:46:01 | |
| Like capital, anything that was capital related one time costs. | 00:46:07 | |
| OK. Because we had some of that last year, but I still think that it may be worthwhile to look at. | 00:46:11 | |
| Previous share numbers because we'd like to change last year. I mean I think for my calculation we have our budget went up about | 00:46:16 | |
| $7,000,000 from 20 to 26 or 20. | 00:46:21 | |
| Fine. And that was a code for safety tax and then I'll set some of the lost property tax. But I really think you'll get a little | 00:46:27 | |
| different picture if you pull in 25. | 00:46:31 | |
| Yeah, we can. We can if, if the task force would like for us to do that, we can. | 00:46:36 | |
| Show you a comparison of 2025 actual expenditures and 2026 budgeting. Did you all? Are you all making bond payments off of that? | 00:46:40 | |
| Lit umm. | 00:46:48 | |
| No, I mean I. | 00:46:54 | |
| I mean, we, we reallocated some things. So I mean, you know, we, we sort of did what you said. Look at the specific budget and the | 00:46:56 | |
| allocations of the department. So. | 00:47:00 | |
| You know the answer to yes, but not you know not. You wouldn't maybe see it on a line item or in the. | 00:47:04 | |
| But I mean as far as just overall. | 00:47:11 | |
| Expenditures, yeah, we're using, you know. | 00:47:13 | |
| Reduce lids like a sandwich. Property tax. | 00:47:16 | |
| I I had that conversation. | 00:47:21 | |
| I had that conversation OK. | 00:47:23 | |
| With the mayor. | 00:47:25 | |
| I did OK. | 00:47:26 | |
| So I'm I'm at the pleasure of the task force so. | 00:47:27 | |
| So here's. | 00:47:33 | |
| I think we've we've gone through a couple of these things. I feel like you maybe need a little bit more information you can tell | 00:47:36 | |
| me, but. | 00:47:39 | |
| I think we can put together 2 plans. | 00:47:42 | |
| 1 is. | 00:47:45 | |
| New Albany opts out. | 00:47:46 | |
| One New Albany OPS in, I think we've kind of got the rates. | 00:47:48 | |
| Pretty good. | 00:47:52 | |
| This is not final. We can come back with that. | 00:47:53 | |
| In a plan, May and. | 00:47:57 | |
| I will also bring with me. | 00:47:59 | |
| What the estimated circuit breaker? | 00:48:01 | |
| Credits look like from 2026 through 2031, just so you get an idea of that. | 00:48:05 | |
| Umm, trying to think of if there's anything else. Is there anything else you think? Do you want to see the cash balances of the | 00:48:13 | |
| other entities? | 00:48:17 | |
| I I tend to not look at that because. | 00:48:22 | |
| That's just kind of extra money and I realized that kind of is indicative of not. | 00:48:26 | |
| Not utilizing the funds, but. | 00:48:31 | |
| It's the recurring cost we really need to worry about. | 00:48:33 | |
| Covering. | 00:48:36 | |
| I don't need to see cash balances unless anybody else's. | 00:48:39 | |
| Request OK. | 00:48:42 | |
| Well, is there anything that I can provide to you at the next meeting that would help? | 00:48:44 | |
| That would help you or give you some clarity. | 00:48:49 | |
| Not that I can say. I mean, I think what you presented tonight is fantastic. | 00:48:56 | |
| OK. | 00:48:59 | |
| Breaks it down. | 00:49:00 | |
| Really nicely. I appreciate that this school system is a part of this and the libraries as well since they were both. | 00:49:01 | |
| Ended up in a situation where they weren't going to be funded and. | 00:49:09 | |
| You know fire as well so. | 00:49:13 | |
| I like that those are still included. | 00:49:16 | |
| And it is interesting to me with the townships. | 00:49:19 | |
| Yes. | 00:49:23 | |
| Umm, that those are, you know, pretty significantly higher numbers. | 00:49:24 | |
| It it is. | 00:49:29 | |
| The mergers. | 00:49:32 | |
| So when I come back, I am going to write that down. I can bring you. | 00:49:36 | |
| Preliminary scoring on all of the townships. When I come back, I'm positive New Albany Township will not be won. | 00:49:41 | |
| That has to merge, but those other ones I think are on. | 00:49:47 | |
| On the cusp and Franklin for sure, so I'll bring that with me next time. When will you know for sure in December? | 00:49:51 | |
| The Department of Local Government Finance will put out their final report. | 00:49:57 | |
| That shows exactly. | 00:50:01 | |
| Which townships will be required to merge? | 00:50:03 | |
| And then I believe it is a county commissioner function after that to determine the. | 00:50:06 | |
| Which were they? | 00:50:11 | |
| Who they should merge with because there are certain circumstances where they may have to merge with the municipality and other | 00:50:12 | |
| circumstances where it's with a Township that touches their boundaries. | 00:50:17 | |
| So we can, we can have a discussion about that at the next time. I, I should have had it this time. So I apologize, but I can | 00:50:23 | |
| certainly bring that next time. | 00:50:27 | |
| When When you come for the next meeting. | 00:50:32 | |
| Will we still be able to plug and play numbers? Absolutely. I'd like to see some of this different scenarios. Absolutely. | 00:50:35 | |
| Yes, nothing is finalized until you vote on it. We're just trying to move this down. | 00:50:43 | |
| The road to where we're getting some sort of. | 00:50:47 | |
| Plan together. | 00:50:51 | |
| Anything else that you want to cover? | 00:50:56 | |
| Everybody all good. | 00:51:03 | |
| Any questions, any final remarks or questions or? | 00:51:04 | |
| Information you need for the next meeting. | 00:51:09 | |
| OK. | 00:51:13 | |
| Thank you. | 00:51:14 | |
| Appreciate you. | 00:51:15 | |
| Would you all mind signing in? | 00:51:17 | |
| Yeah. | 00:51:23 |
Transcript
| You ready? | 00:00:06 | |
| All right. Welcome, everyone. | 00:00:08 | |
| To the July 30th must meeting. | 00:00:10 | |
| We're going to get to a presentation of. | 00:00:13 | |
| A quick presentation from the. | 00:00:15 | |
| Schools here in a minute, I've got a. | 00:00:18 | |
| Brief opening statement that I want to read. | 00:00:22 | |
| Some of this is circling us back and some of this is in response to some stuff that's been put out here recently, so. | 00:00:25 | |
| There seems to be some misunderstanding of the purpose of this task force and the relationships between these different. | 00:00:32 | |
| Taxing units. | 00:00:36 | |
| This task force is a group of representatives working towards suggestions for the state legislature. | 00:00:38 | |
| On how we plan to navigate through the bill that they have given us. | 00:00:43 | |
| The mayor of New Albany seems to think that the county's past clerical mistakes have some sort of bearing on these proceedings. | 00:00:47 | |
| Let me assure him, and anyone else that's concerned about that, that it's simply not the case. | 00:00:51 | |
| The county is in good standing with the state and maintains an A+ rating with S&P. | 00:00:56 | |
| The mayor likes to deflect attention from his policies and lack of transparency and then turn off comments on his post. | 00:01:00 | |
| Nothing new there. | 00:01:05 | |
| The city created transparency portal which is anything but transparent. | 00:01:07 | |
| Citizens are still waiting for financial statements on River Run Water Park. | 00:01:11 | |
| The legal and contractual bills from the Providence Mill Dam and the total cost of the police station and an explanation of why | 00:01:14 | |
| county residents should be paying for part of it through their sewer bills. | 00:01:18 | |
| There's never been any discussion of creating Uniguff style government here in this county. | 00:01:22 | |
| Any reference to such by the mayor is fear mongering. | 00:01:27 | |
| The mayor lobbied me and other and another council member to pass the public safety. | 00:01:30 | |
| Through the county. | 00:01:34 | |
| That is certainly not the reason that it was passed. | 00:01:35 | |
| But for not. | 00:01:38 | |
| For if we do not pass it, the city's public safety. | 00:01:39 | |
| Would be in shambles. | 00:01:41 | |
| The city was so far behind. | 00:01:43 | |
| And competent equipment. | 00:01:44 | |
| That I had to purchase used equipment from neighboring departments. | 00:01:46 | |
| No acknowledgement from the mayor has ever been given to the county. | 00:01:48 | |
| For passage of that public safety lip. | 00:01:52 | |
| We will finish the work that's been started on this must task force. | 00:01:55 | |
| And it is my desire that the city continues to participate. | 00:01:58 | |
| Our governments have no ties or participation in any joint operations. | 00:02:01 | |
| And that's a shame for the taxpayers. | 00:02:05 | |
| Control and power are dangerous things when collected in one office. | 00:02:07 | |
| Let's work together. | 00:02:11 | |
| Just one time in good faith and not care about who gets the credit for the outcome. | 00:02:12 | |
| Thank you. | 00:02:18 | |
| Are you are you speaking? | 00:02:25 | |
| Sorry. | 00:02:28 | |
| All right. Thank you for the opportunity to speak on behalf of the schools. I was asked to do a brief presentation to outline. | 00:02:31 | |
| The effect of the legislation. | 00:02:37 | |
| With us, it's very complex because of the way school funding works and I'll try to simplify it and. | 00:02:39 | |
| Mostly focus on the operations fund. | 00:02:44 | |
| But to do that, you got to have a little bit of global understanding as well. | 00:02:47 | |
| So next slide, Travis? | 00:02:50 | |
| So. | 00:02:54 | |
| This is a report from Policy Analytics. | 00:02:55 | |
| The only slide I added was the last slide. | 00:02:57 | |
| To give context, whatever budget looks like. | 00:02:59 | |
| But what they what they did as part of a larger presentation is they looked at where we stand with our education, operations and | 00:03:02 | |
| operating reference funds, which we do not have an operating referendum fund. | 00:03:07 | |
| And compared us to what we look like across the state. | 00:03:12 | |
| And when you look at the two major fund or the three major funds? | 00:03:14 | |
| To which we have education operations. | 00:03:17 | |
| We're about $400.00 below the state average. | 00:03:20 | |
| A little bit less than 400. | 00:03:23 | |
| So we're currently operating more efficiently. | 00:03:24 | |
| Than the average school district. We don't have an operating referendum which we've not sought, one we try to maintain. | 00:03:27 | |
| Our daily operations within the. | 00:03:33 | |
| Normal operating budgets. | 00:03:36 | |
| Next slide. | 00:03:38 | |
| There's some complexities in this slide. It's only looking at the Levy, not the entire budget, but what we wanted to show on here. | 00:03:42 | |
| Is there's a lot of costs that are out of our control? | 00:03:49 | |
| That we've been experiencing. | 00:03:52 | |
| Double digit increases on. | 00:03:53 | |
| One of those is insurance. | 00:03:55 | |
| A near double digit. | 00:03:57 | |
| Increase on transportation, so for instance buses. | 00:03:59 | |
| A decade ago, ran. | 00:04:03 | |
| About 80 to $90,000. | 00:04:05 | |
| Or pushing $200,000 today without much difference in specs. | 00:04:07 | |
| The cost of steel, cost of production have all gone up, so in some cases we've seen double. | 00:04:10 | |
| And a decade. | 00:04:15 | |
| But a lot of, like I said, a lot of these cost. | 00:04:17 | |
| Utilities, things of that nature we have. | 00:04:19 | |
| Pretty minimal control over. | 00:04:21 | |
| And so we're seeing increases higher than any of our. | 00:04:25 | |
| Budget increases overtime, which means we cut other. | 00:04:28 | |
| Services in order to provide the basics. | 00:04:32 | |
| The next slide. | 00:04:36 | |
| Outlines. | 00:04:37 | |
| Our unfunded credits. | 00:04:38 | |
| Before this year, we would have just seen. | 00:04:40 | |
| A circuit breaker loss and typically our circuit breaker loss which means revenue that. | 00:04:43 | |
| Could have been levied. That's not received. | 00:04:47 | |
| Ran around $1.8 million. | 00:04:50 | |
| As the high. | 00:04:53 | |
| This year we're going to see. | 00:04:54 | |
| The credits and circuit breaker total over 4.4 million. | 00:04:56 | |
| So we've already. | 00:04:59 | |
| Cut the budget and the operations fund. | 00:05:01 | |
| To account for this so we still. | 00:05:03 | |
| Break even cash flow. | 00:05:05 | |
| But that's more than double. | 00:05:07 | |
| The what we would typically see in one year. | 00:05:10 | |
| And so that has nothing to do even with. | 00:05:13 | |
| The discussion of lit that we're here to talk about tonight. So we've been making adjustments. | 00:05:15 | |
| Over the last few years. | 00:05:21 | |
| Where expenses of. | 00:05:23 | |
| Been outstripping. | 00:05:24 | |
| Pacing the the revenue. | 00:05:26 | |
| And then? | 00:05:28 | |
| Additional shortfalls in revenue coming in through this past legislation. | 00:05:29 | |
| Next slide. | 00:05:34 | |
| Shows what we project our. | 00:05:35 | |
| CNAFT to be over the next few years you'll see a decline. | 00:05:37 | |
| Until about 2031, then we. | 00:05:40 | |
| Might see an increase again, but when you take this factor in addition to the. | 00:05:42 | |
| Credits Circuit Breaker. | 00:05:48 | |
| I had an increasing expense as you can see. | 00:05:50 | |
| What we're looking at. | 00:05:52 | |
| From a budget perspective. | 00:05:53 | |
| And so the. | 00:05:56 | |
| The final slide here. | 00:05:56 | |
| Is. | 00:05:58 | |
| Our 2025 revenue and expenditures. | 00:05:59 | |
| So our operations fund. | 00:06:02 | |
| Was around 41 million. | 00:06:04 | |
| With revenue a little bit under 41 million. | 00:06:06 | |
| And our expenditures. | 00:06:08 | |
| Couple 100,000 below that we always try to. | 00:06:10 | |
| Balance or cash flow unless we're doing. | 00:06:12 | |
| One time capital project or something that nature, but we. | 00:06:14 | |
| Right now are within our target cash balances and where we want to be. So we're project we we try to maintain that steady. | 00:06:17 | |
| Cash flow. | 00:06:25 | |
| On the revenue side? | 00:06:27 | |
| The the biggest part of our revenue comes from local property taxes, the levy. | 00:06:28 | |
| Which is usually capped. | 00:06:33 | |
| The last couple years around 4%. I think this year it's going to be 6% after a few years of cap. | 00:06:35 | |
| That's a formula that the state gives on the levy. | 00:06:41 | |
| Part of the revenue and this comes back to 2019 when they took the general fund. | 00:06:44 | |
| And and capital projects fund and and some other funds and split them out into an education revenue education. | 00:06:49 | |
| And operations fund. | 00:06:55 | |
| So the money we get from the state. | 00:06:56 | |
| For the per pupil fundings. | 00:06:59 | |
| More than. | 00:07:01 | |
| What's required to run the education fund because the general fund was larger? | 00:07:02 | |
| And so some of that money every month gets transferred from the education operations fund. Every school does this as part of the | 00:07:06 | |
| operate operations. | 00:07:10 | |
| We can transfer up to 15%. I think last year we transferred 14. I'm down to 12 trying to preserve cash flow in the education fund. | 00:07:15 | |
| But that's why there's a. | 00:07:22 | |
| Back in 2019, that's why that exists as a line now, just because the way the funds work compared to the revenue. | 00:07:24 | |
| Lit which is the. | 00:07:30 | |
| The topic of this. | 00:07:32 | |
| Task Force. | 00:07:34 | |
| Is close to 6% of our budget. It ranges anywhere from 567 percent every year. So we get about $2.4 million. | 00:07:35 | |
| In lit, which is set to expire for us in a couple of years. | 00:07:41 | |
| And then we have some smaller sources of revenue. | 00:07:45 | |
| But it's. | 00:07:47 | |
| And our top three? | 00:07:48 | |
| And that will go from. | 00:07:49 | |
| 2.4. | 00:07:51 | |
| To 0. | 00:07:52 | |
| So basically a Cliff there. | 00:07:53 | |
| So on the right side, outline the expenditures and just kind of tell you sort of what we're doing there. | 00:07:55 | |
| In 2026, our revenues projected to be around 36 million because that previous slide I showed you. So we're matching our | 00:07:59 | |
| expenditures. | 00:08:02 | |
| We've dropped them down to 36 million. | 00:08:05 | |
| Have we done that? Well, the. | 00:08:07 | |
| The biggest piece of it? | 00:08:08 | |
| That middle line capital projects. | 00:08:09 | |
| We have to do almost all capital projects out of bonds. | 00:08:11 | |
| So when you see a project being done, that's typically the operations, that's typically going to be a bond through the debt | 00:08:14 | |
| service fund. | 00:08:17 | |
| Which is one of the few funds that we. | 00:08:21 | |
| We have some local control over. | 00:08:22 | |
| So the biggest expenses we have. | 00:08:25 | |
| Transportation. | 00:08:27 | |
| And facilities personnel, I'd be your bus drivers. | 00:08:28 | |
| Bus aids, custodians, maintenance people. | 00:08:31 | |
| Those are the two biggest drivers of cost in the operations fund. | 00:08:35 | |
| Then we have repairs, materials contracts makes up the third largest. | 00:08:39 | |
| So those contracts might be repair contracts, preventative maintenance contracts, repairs materials budgets. | 00:08:43 | |
| To keep. | 00:08:48 | |
| Our 20 locations. | 00:08:49 | |
| Running on the daily basis. | 00:08:52 | |
| The capital projects for 2026, right, You know, last year was around 13%. This year it's going to be less than 5%. | 00:08:53 | |
| That's the cuts that we were making in order to. | 00:08:59 | |
| The cash flow list and we're always looking at more efficient routing, more efficient. | 00:09:01 | |
| Use of. | 00:09:05 | |
| Personnel, but there's only so far you can cut before. | 00:09:06 | |
| You umm. | 00:09:09 | |
| Stop providing services at a rate people expected. | 00:09:10 | |
| Our utilities costs have increased not as much as some around the state. Our utilities costs around. | 00:09:13 | |
| 10% of the budget. | 00:09:19 | |
| Our Superintendent office HR, payroll business. | 00:09:20 | |
| Around 7 1/2. | 00:09:23 | |
| Custodial contract, that's our outsourced Knight custodian 7%. | 00:09:25 | |
| And then some other miscellaneous cost, whether it be our technology, personnel, technology, software, things of that nature. | 00:09:29 | |
| Round off the bottom there. | 00:09:36 | |
| So. | 00:09:37 | |
| On top of a. | 00:09:38 | |
| About a. | 00:09:39 | |
| 3 to 4 million. | 00:09:40 | |
| Loss that we're seeing now. | 00:09:41 | |
| In addition to sharing money with charter schools and two years. | 00:09:43 | |
| The the loss of lit puts us less revenue. | 00:09:47 | |
| In 2027202029 than what we had in 2023-2024. | 00:09:50 | |
| And with rising costs, you can see that equation doesn't work very well when we were already. | 00:09:55 | |
| Become very efficient. | 00:09:59 | |
| Over time. | 00:10:00 | |
| To account for those previous losses. So we're asking. | 00:10:01 | |
| For consideration to be able to maintain at least. | 00:10:05 | |
| Some of the funding from. | 00:10:08 | |
| The lid as this task force proceeds so. | 00:10:11 | |
| Be glad to take any questions or provide more information. | 00:10:14 | |
| And future meetings. But that's just a real quick. | 00:10:18 | |
| Overview to respect your time and. | 00:10:20 | |
| At least lay a foundation for where we are. | 00:10:22 | |
| So. | 00:10:25 | |
| Anybody have any questions for Mr. St. | 00:10:27 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 00:10:32 | |
| We just need a moment to get set up. | 00:10:41 | |
| We're gonna Oh. | 00:12:10 | |
| Wow, that was great, Andrew. | 00:12:11 | |
| So I have Andrew with me today because if you want. | 00:12:13 | |
| Us to run some scenarios, we certainly can do that. | 00:12:17 | |
| We're really going to start talking about numbers tonight and, um. | 00:12:20 | |
| A proposed lit structure. | 00:12:24 | |
| So I did give you handouts because while this is very tiny and there's a lot on this page, so. | 00:12:27 | |
| What what this is, let me just explain what's on here. So what we did is we looked at the budgets of all the units within the | 00:12:35 | |
| county and we tried to pull out only those budgets that are recurring. | 00:12:40 | |
| So if it was a capital type of fund or a capital dedicated fund or you had capital outlays in your budget, we did try to strip | 00:12:45 | |
| that out because we were trying to figure out. | 00:12:50 | |
| How much local income tax is supporting those recurring budgets? | 00:12:56 | |
| So if you look. | 00:13:01 | |
| In the orange that. | 00:13:03 | |
| Is the budgeted expenditures for 2026. | 00:13:04 | |
| And we can start with the county unit. So the county unit has 54.3 million of budget expenditures. Yes, the county's budget is | 00:13:09 | |
| much, much higher than that. | 00:13:14 | |
| We just pulled out the operating and recurring funds. | 00:13:19 | |
| So if you look all the way across there total budget 54.3 million. Now when we get into the green, we look at OK, So what is the | 00:13:23 | |
| total local income tax distribution that goes to the county unit? | 00:13:29 | |
| And that is? | 00:13:36 | |
| 2424 point 4 million in total. So that includes all of the county units lit. | 00:13:37 | |
| So that really makes up about 45% of recurring costs for the county. So it's a fairly big revenue source for the county. | 00:13:44 | |
| So the far right hand column, kind of the pink or purple columns, those are. | 00:13:53 | |
| Kind of art, illustrative. | 00:13:59 | |
| Tax rate structure, this is you did not. | 00:14:01 | |
| Ask us to do these rates. We did it for you just as an illustration, because we were like, OK, what is it going to take? | 00:14:04 | |
| To have a rate. | 00:14:11 | |
| That is somewhat revenue neutral. | 00:14:12 | |
| So to get. | 00:14:15 | |
| Enough revenue that covers about what what each of these units are bringing in now. I think that's a good place to start. | 00:14:17 | |
| And then? | 00:14:24 | |
| Provided you know, you provide us input and we can run some other scenarios if you wish, but that rate for the county unit. | 00:14:25 | |
| Would be about .6%. | 00:14:32 | |
| To get the county to approximately where they need to be, so not the full 1.2%. | 00:14:35 | |
| For the municipalities, the municipal budgets, Georgetown has a. | 00:14:42 | |
| A recurring budget of about 1.3 million. | 00:14:46 | |
| Lit distributions for 2026 is about 434,000, which represents about 30, almost 34%. | 00:14:50 | |
| Of the budgeted expenses for Georgetown. | 00:14:59 | |
| And so if we look at all the municipalities combined, that would take about a 1.03% for all of the municipalities combined. Now we | 00:15:03 | |
| did assume. | 00:15:08 | |
| That Georgetown and New Albany would opt in. | 00:15:13 | |
| That's just a scenario. We can also have a scenario where one or both opt out. But again, we needed a place to start, a place | 00:15:16 | |
| where you can start considering what you might feel is best for the county. | 00:15:22 | |
| Greenfield or Greenville? | 00:15:29 | |
| Town. | 00:15:31 | |
| That it's about a $264,000 budget. | 00:15:32 | |
| Greenville gets a distribution of 28,200, which is roughly 11% of. | 00:15:36 | |
| There are recurring costs. | 00:15:43 | |
| That 1.03% county wide municipal rate would generate almost 800,000 for Greenville. That's quite a bit more than what they're | 00:15:45 | |
| getting now, but here's the deal with that county wide. | 00:15:51 | |
| Municipal rate, you can't. | 00:15:57 | |
| Do different rates for different municipalities? It's one rate. | 00:15:59 | |
| And then it gets divided up. | 00:16:03 | |
| Why it gets divided up or allocated to the municipalities based primarily on population? | 00:16:04 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:16:10 | |
| The way I understood it was. | 00:16:14 | |
| If any of the municipalities. | 00:16:16 | |
| Opted in. | 00:16:19 | |
| That. | 00:16:20 | |
| Even the county would be at the same rate. | 00:16:21 | |
| Can there be two different rates .6 and 1.03 so. | 00:16:23 | |
| That .6 is just the county's portion. | 00:16:26 | |
| Of that, OK. | 00:16:30 | |
| And I think actually that 24.4 million is that the counties. | 00:16:31 | |
| And the municipal portion combined. | 00:16:35 | |
| Yeah, that's inclusive about. So let me just explain that because it is a bit confusing. | 00:16:37 | |
| .6 is the county services rate. | 00:16:42 | |
| And then .03 is the county wide municipal rate, your shares of both of those combined is the 24.4 million. | 00:16:45 | |
| Yeah, I probably should have put it down under the municipalities because really that. | 00:16:53 | |
| You you get 2 shares. | 00:16:58 | |
| So we would be adopting a a rate in this scenario of 1.03. | 00:17:00 | |
| Yes, for the municipal right. | 00:17:04 | |
| And then .6 for the county services. Those are two different routes. | 00:17:06 | |
| OK, now we go down to the city of New Albany, again just looking at recurring cost about 48.3 million. | 00:17:11 | |
| Their total lit distribution is 21.95 million. | 00:17:20 | |
| So sort of like the county, about 45% of those recurring costs are local income tax. So that's a pretty big chunk. | 00:17:25 | |
| And again if the if they opt. | 00:17:35 | |
| Into the county wide rate. | 00:17:37 | |
| Their distribution would be about 22.1 million. | 00:17:39 | |
| Which is close to what they have now. So again. | 00:17:44 | |
| There's going to be winners, losers, etc. But. | 00:17:48 | |
| Trying to get. | 00:17:50 | |
| Kind of a revenue neutral rate for these municipalities and the county. | 00:17:52 | |
| Now we can drop down to the Township, so. | 00:17:58 | |
| Remember that. | 00:18:01 | |
| Each. | 00:18:02 | |
| Non municipal unit type. | 00:18:03 | |
| We can't go over .05%. | 00:18:05 | |
| So looking at the townships, we of course looked at all their budgets townships provide. | 00:18:09 | |
| Township Administration. | 00:18:14 | |
| Public assistance. | 00:18:17 | |
| Cemeteries and in this county, no more fire because we're we know now that you're all consolidated. | 00:18:19 | |
| So you can just see how much is provided in Township administration. If we look at all those townships combined, it's about | 00:18:27 | |
| 518,000. | 00:18:31 | |
| Public assistance. All of those townships combined about 255,000. | 00:18:35 | |
| Cemeteries. | 00:18:41 | |
| 55,500 or 58,500? | 00:18:42 | |
| So then if you look across to how much local income tax is getting distributed to each of these townships? | 00:18:46 | |
| $15,073 is distributed to Franklin Township. Well, that. | 00:18:53 | |
| Is. | 00:18:58 | |
| More than what they need to fund all of their services combined. And by the way, Franklin Township is. | 00:18:59 | |
| One of those townships. | 00:19:04 | |
| That will likely require. | 00:19:06 | |
| Merger. | 00:19:08 | |
| I think these other three townships, not excluding New Albany, but Georgetown, Greenville and Lafayette. | 00:19:09 | |
| They are scoring points there. I don't have a final point count, but. | 00:19:15 | |
| They could be close to having to merge as well. | 00:19:20 | |
| But Franklin Township, definitely. | 00:19:23 | |
| So total lit. | 00:19:26 | |
| Again. | 00:19:28 | |
| 228% of what Franklin Township needs under the illustrative formula 17,500 should they be required to merge. | 00:19:29 | |
| Depending on who they merge with, that 17,500 would merge in with that other with the Township. | 00:19:39 | |
| Or with the merging entity. | 00:19:44 | |
| Georgetown Township. | 00:19:46 | |
| They get. | 00:19:48 | |
| 24,810 that's about 26% of their total budget. | 00:19:49 | |
| Under the .03% scenario they would get 126,000, so that's a lot more than what they're getting now. | 00:19:54 | |
| Greenville Township. | 00:20:02 | |
| They're getting $284 of local income tax. Under the .03% scenario it would be about 86,000. | 00:20:04 | |
| Lafayette Township is getting $10,375, about 25% of their budget. | 00:20:14 | |
| Under the new scenario about 93,000. | 00:20:20 | |
| And then New Albany Township. | 00:20:24 | |
| They're currently getting about 21.4%. | 00:20:26 | |
| Of their budget is is lit certified shares which is 136,551. | 00:20:32 | |
| So again, we've got that at point. | 00:20:37 | |
| Oh 3% which is lower than what the Max is do all. | 00:20:40 | |
| Townships have to be on the same rate. | 00:20:44 | |
| Yes, because we what the Council will do is adopt one rate. | 00:20:46 | |
| And then that will be distributed to the townships based on their population. | 00:20:50 | |
| And we could run a scenario to to do a lower rate to see if that would. | 00:20:56 | |
| If that would still work, but I think what we were trying to do is make sure that. | 00:21:02 | |
| Franklin Township didn't drop below their current rate, but if they're going to be merged anyway, it probably is not. | 00:21:06 | |
| And this doesn't take into account. | 00:21:13 | |
| Cash on hand in the Township or anything and that's what why we really tried to focus on recurring costs because cash on hand, you | 00:21:16 | |
| know, typically just use that for one time expenditures, capital and things, but. | 00:21:21 | |
| There if you want. | 00:21:27 | |
| The cash balances, we can bring that next meeting because we have that as well. | 00:21:29 | |
| What we're finding with. | 00:21:32 | |
| With the townships is there's. | 00:21:34 | |
| There's no more capital. | 00:21:36 | |
| Unless they are moving into a new building or. | 00:21:37 | |
| Yeah, and that's why some townships have. | 00:21:40 | |
| Relatively large cash reserves. | 00:21:43 | |
| Because they they aren't spending. | 00:21:45 | |
| That. | 00:21:47 | |
| And they are required by law to prepare our capital improvement plan and that's continuing for this year as well. | 00:21:49 | |
| And quite frankly, if they. | 00:21:57 | |
| Meet certain criteria to. | 00:21:59 | |
| Criteria. They are supposed to. | 00:22:01 | |
| Provide monies to the municipality and or county for infrastructure improvements. | 00:22:03 | |
| If they're not using the money. | 00:22:11 | |
| OK, so now we move down to the library. There's only one library here. | 00:22:13 | |
| Their budget is 5.2 million roughly. | 00:22:18 | |
| The lid that they receive is 1,163,000. That's about 22% of their budget. | 00:22:22 | |
| Again, we could have set a rate at point O 5, but at. | 00:22:29 | |
| .04%. | 00:22:32 | |
| That will generate about what they're getting now, which is about $1.2 million. | 00:22:34 | |
| You also have two special districts here. | 00:22:41 | |
| In the county that get certified shares lit, so we had to look at those as well. | 00:22:44 | |
| So New Albany flood control, their budget is 3.9 million. | 00:22:49 | |
| They currently get. | 00:22:53 | |
| $1,026,000 of LIT, which is roughly 26% of their budget. | 00:22:55 | |
| If the county adopts a point. | 00:23:02 | |
| Percent rate for special districts. | 00:23:05 | |
| That would generate about 1,032,000, so pretty close to what they're getting now. | 00:23:08 | |
| Floyd County solid waste. | 00:23:14 | |
| The budget is for 488,000 roughly. | 00:23:15 | |
| They only get about 4% of their budget, which is about $20,000. | 00:23:19 | |
| From local income tax at a .04% rate, they would get more, obviously at 182,000. | 00:23:24 | |
| The schools, you heard from them, we, we actually combined the operations and education. But if you just look at operations, you | 00:23:32 | |
| heard the school say it was a $40.6 million budget. | 00:23:37 | |
| They get. | 00:23:43 | |
| Lit distributions of 2.4 million, which would be about 5.7% of a $40.6 million. If you add in education, it's like. | 00:23:44 | |
| Less than 2%, but regardless that that's a pretty big chunk. | 00:23:53 | |
| For revenue to get from local income tax. | 00:23:58 | |
| You this is not in the statue, but we were trying to determine, OK, what rate would the Council need to adopt if it were allowed? | 00:24:01 | |
| So that the school could get a distribution that is equal. | 00:24:09 | |
| Approximately equal to what they're getting now, and that would be .08%. | 00:24:13 | |
| I have other MUS committees that. | 00:24:18 | |
| Are working in a rate. | 00:24:20 | |
| For the school and they will include that in the report. That doesn't mean you have to do that, but. | 00:24:22 | |
| Realizing it's not in the current statute. | 00:24:26 | |
| But if it's something you feel strongly about, we can certainly work that into the overall plan. | 00:24:29 | |
| And then finally is the fire and EMS. We have the Floyd County Fire Protection territory. | 00:24:36 | |
| This budget that you see of $13 million, that is a projected budget for 2027 because that's when that full county wide fire | 00:24:42 | |
| territory will be in effect. | 00:24:47 | |
| We did look at what? | 00:24:53 | |
| Lit they are currently receiving now which is about 2.7 million, so that's 21% of their. | 00:24:55 | |
| Budget New Albany Fire Department. | 00:25:00 | |
| The budget is 8.6 million. | 00:25:04 | |
| Which is funded primarily out of the general fund. | 00:25:07 | |
| So we. | 00:25:11 | |
| I mean, you could say that some of the going into the general fund is going to the fire department, but since it's not directly | 00:25:14 | |
| distributed to fire. | 00:25:18 | |
| We didn't show it here because we showed it up in the New Albany line item. | 00:25:21 | |
| So technically, there's not a direct distribution of local income tax to the New Albany Fire Department, but. | 00:25:26 | |
| If the council would adopt the .4% which is the maximum for fire and EMS. | 00:25:33 | |
| Then the Floyd County fire territory would get 6.4 million. | 00:25:39 | |
| And New Albany Fire Department would get 5.7 million, and that's above and beyond what New Albany City would get in their | 00:25:43 | |
| distribution for their civil funds. | 00:25:48 | |
| So if you look at the combined rate of just this illustration, you're at 2.22%. | 00:25:54 | |
| The current county rate is 1.79%. | 00:26:00 | |
| So it's just over the current. | 00:26:04 | |
| County rate. | 00:26:07 | |
| So I know that's a lot of information, but I think. | 00:26:09 | |
| We're at the point now where. | 00:26:12 | |
| We kind of need to get feedback from the task force as to. | 00:26:14 | |
| Are you looking to have a neutral rate? Like do you want to keep it at 1.79%? | 00:26:18 | |
| Do you want to try to keep the revenue neutral, which is what we've? | 00:26:24 | |
| Provided in this illustration. | 00:26:28 | |
| Do you want to take a closer look at any one of these? | 00:26:31 | |
| Like, you know, Andrews here, we can run a few scenarios and we can actually put them up on the screen if that's helpful. | 00:26:35 | |
| We're just at that point where we really need to have some open discussion as to what you think. | 00:26:42 | |
| I think you 2 are probably OK with everything you're seeing. | 00:26:52 | |
| Great. | 00:26:55 | |
| I mean it's. | 00:26:58 | |
| It's umm. Those numbers are impressive. | 00:27:01 | |
| For the town in Georgetown for sure, yeah. | 00:27:04 | |
| I don't know if you want to see any scenarios run Linda or he want to. | 00:27:08 | |
| Do you have a scenario for opt out as well tonight? | 00:27:14 | |
| Do you want to run through this first? | 00:27:17 | |
| We absolutely can. | 00:27:19 | |
| For the county, I think. | 00:27:21 | |
| Just for the county, I think this looks. | 00:27:24 | |
| About where we want to be. | 00:27:28 | |
| You know, maybe just a few. | 00:27:30 | |
| A few tweaks, but overall, you know, we're we're. | 00:27:33 | |
| Definitely in the ballpark for. | 00:27:37 | |
| Where we want to be moving forward. | 00:27:39 | |
| But I don't know if you want to see anything different. | 00:27:41 | |
| On this scenario. | 00:27:43 | |
| Any numbers change and see what they look like or. | 00:27:45 | |
| So Andrew, Are you ready to show or do we need to give you a few minutes? Are you ready to show what that summary page would look | 00:27:50 | |
| like if we had New Albany opt out? | 00:27:56 | |
| OK. | 00:28:06 | |
| And and so we have it up on the screen. I don't. Can you guys see the screen? Oh, you can. OK, Perfect. Perfect. | 00:28:07 | |
| OK, so I'm seeing this. | 00:28:14 | |
| I can. | 00:28:18 | |
| Would you like to go through it, Andrew? | 00:28:20 | |
| OK there. Thank you. Because he knows how old I am so. | 00:28:23 | |
| All right, so. | 00:28:26 | |
| If. | 00:28:28 | |
| If New Albany opts out, let's just start there. So at 1.2%. | 00:28:29 | |
| If New Albany opts out and adopts their own rate at 1.2%, that would give them 11 million 192,672. | 00:28:33 | |
| So that's about half. | 00:28:44 | |
| Of what they're getting now, so here. But here's how it affects the municipalities Georgetown would get. | 00:28:46 | |
| 450,000 where we had. | 00:28:52 | |
| Did it really change that much? | 00:28:58 | |
| Just looking, the previous was. | 00:29:02 | |
| Oh, I see. I'm sorry. | 00:29:06 | |
| Oh gosh. Yeah, OK. | 00:29:09 | |
| Yep, Yep, Yep. | 00:29:12 | |
| So under this scenario, if New Albany opts out and we're still trying to keep the revenue neutral, then that would be a rate of | 00:29:14 | |
| .16% for the municipal. What is the county share of that? It is 2,754,000. | 00:29:22 | |
| So yeah, there's some big differences there. Greenville, but still Greenville and Georgetown, you're still getting more. I mean, | 00:29:33 | |
| Georgetown not so much more, but you're still getting more than what you got before. | 00:29:38 | |
| The rate does come down, it's .16% for the municipal. | 00:29:44 | |
| And the New Albany is at 1.2. | 00:29:50 | |
| So if we look at the county, the counties the county services share should still be the same at 18.2 million. | 00:29:53 | |
| But now the the municipal lit portion is 2.7. | 00:30:01 | |
| So that is about what? | 00:30:05 | |
| Yeah, about 4 million or 3,000,000 less or something like that. | 00:30:09 | |
| We kept the rate the same at .6% for the county portion. | 00:30:15 | |
| The score, we kept the same, everything else is the same. So where are we at? | 00:30:18 | |
| Andrew, we're at 2.39%. | 00:30:23 | |
| The Albany rate would be 2.39. | 00:30:28 | |
| But the other people would pay how much? | 00:30:30 | |
| 1.35%. | 00:30:34 | |
| So do you understand that this is there's so many moving parts? So if I live in the city of New Albany under the scenario. | 00:30:36 | |
| I would pay a rate of 2.39%. If I live anywhere else in the county, I would pay a rate of 1.35%. | 00:30:43 | |
| Under this scenario that I handed out. | 00:30:52 | |
| Everyone in the county would pay 2.22%. | 00:30:55 | |
| The only time there's going to be a difference in tax rates based on where you live is if. | 00:31:00 | |
| One of the municipalities opt out, and the only two municipalities that can opt out is Georgetown and New Albany. | 00:31:05 | |
| Does that make sense? | 00:31:13 | |
| So maybe we talk about what do you think about the school rate? | 00:31:20 | |
| Do you do you like that in your plan? | 00:31:24 | |
| I know I feel like I'm really putting you on the spot, but. | 00:31:29 | |
| It's just things that we need to discuss. | 00:31:31 | |
| Yeah, I mean, I thought. | 00:31:34 | |
| For us, I think it'll be. | 00:31:35 | |
| Something that we definitely consider and OK. | 00:31:37 | |
| Will help out. | 00:31:42 | |
| And their budget is twice what ours is. | 00:31:45 | |
| But I I I think. | 00:31:50 | |
| You know from speaking to some. | 00:31:51 | |
| Other members on our council that. | 00:31:53 | |
| It's definitely something we want to look at. | 00:31:55 | |
| OK. And remember this is non binding. I'm not and we're not asking you to vote tonight either where I'm just trying to figure out | 00:31:57 | |
| what type of plan you would like for us to draw up so that we can get to a. | 00:32:02 | |
| Position where you would want to vote. | 00:32:08 | |
| And you don't even have to vote in favor if you don't want. It's just. | 00:32:10 | |
| We need to develop a plan. | 00:32:14 | |
| So then let's OK, so the schools unless. | 00:32:15 | |
| There's any objection? We'll just keep moving forward under that scenario. | 00:32:19 | |
| Fire in EMS. | 00:32:24 | |
| It's at the Max at .4%. Do you want to see a different scenario? | 00:32:26 | |
| Something lower. We were talking in .2 OK previously. | 00:32:31 | |
| OK. | 00:32:34 | |
| Would probably be. Do you have somebody that would like to speak? | 00:32:36 | |
| Are you OK with? Yeah, sure. I just wanted to make a. | 00:32:40 | |
| Clarification. | 00:32:43 | |
| The numbers that Baker Tilly has pulled for fire EMS for the fire territory are only for fire suppression services. | 00:32:45 | |
| We've entered into an interlocal with the county. | 00:32:52 | |
| To also take responsibility for providing all of the EMS services. | 00:32:54 | |
| For the county starting January 1st. | 00:32:58 | |
| So the total number for the territory, we're going to run it as two separate divisions, but it's one bucket of money. As far as | 00:33:01 | |
| the budget, it's going to be closer to 16.5. | 00:33:05 | |
| So we had budgeted and planned on an agreement with the. | 00:33:10 | |
| Council that the EMS portion of that which is about 4.5 million. | 00:33:14 | |
| Would be covered by lit. | 00:33:19 | |
| Or some other? | 00:33:22 | |
| Revenue stream from the. | 00:33:23 | |
| From the county so we're. | 00:33:24 | |
| We could definitely look at .3 and. | 00:33:25 | |
| And see where that and then. | 00:33:28 | |
| Part of the agreement also. | 00:33:30 | |
| I want you to think I'm making this up. | 00:33:31 | |
| We agreed with the county that we would provide the EMS services, we would provide the revenue to provide the EMS services and | 00:33:34 | |
| that we would tap the lit. | 00:33:38 | |
| To offset the property tax. | 00:33:42 | |
| Bill that the citizens are paying. | 00:33:44 | |
| So the intent and discussions nothing was agreed to was that if the Council went forward with .4. | 00:33:46 | |
| It would give us roughly about this six and a half million in. | 00:33:52 | |
| 4 1/2 would pay for the EMS. | 00:33:56 | |
| 2,000,000 would subsidized the fire service, which would lower the property tax bill for the community. | 00:33:58 | |
| By a commensurate amount. | 00:34:04 | |
| We did that this year. | 00:34:05 | |
| The first creation of the territory. | 00:34:07 | |
| We lowered the. | 00:34:10 | |
| Levy by an amount equal to the amount of lit that we got this year. | 00:34:11 | |
| So our intent was that we would try and help out the community by lowering that property tax bill. | 00:34:16 | |
| By sharing some of that burden with the lip. | 00:34:21 | |
| So if you go something other than .4. | 00:34:23 | |
| That's not what we've been talking about, and we'd have to kind of figure out how we would handle that. | 00:34:26 | |
| So I just want to make sure because. | 00:34:30 | |
| I don't think you guys knew about that. | 00:34:31 | |
| No, I I think there's conversations with primarily between the fire territory and the commissioners, not necessarily the council. | 00:34:34 | |
| Yeah. | 00:34:37 | |
| I'm not sure which is fine. | 00:34:41 | |
| But we don't have that information. We can't well. | 00:34:44 | |
| Commissioner Sharp called me yesterday. | 00:34:48 | |
| And was speaking to that. | 00:34:51 | |
| OK, but he did not. | 00:34:53 | |
| Tie it all together for me so. | 00:34:55 | |
| I apologize that. | 00:34:59 | |
| No worries. No, that's why we're having these meetings so good. | 00:35:00 | |
| So do you still want to see the .3? You can. | 00:35:06 | |
| Plug it in at .3. | 00:35:10 | |
| Just just so we can see it. Yeah. No, sure I understand. | 00:35:12 | |
| There we go. It's up on the screen, so yeah. | 00:35:17 | |
| .3 would generate about $4.8 million. | 00:35:20 | |
| For the fire territory and 4.3 roughly for the city of New Albany. | 00:35:25 | |
| OK. I think more important for. | 00:35:38 | |
| The county is reaching a balance between. | 00:35:40 | |
| Our our total. | 00:35:43 | |
| We're not. | 00:35:47 | |
| Not as concerned about. | 00:35:49 | |
| The different buckets, just the overall total so. | 00:35:51 | |
| 6.4 and we're at. | 00:35:54 | |
| .6 and I think we're. | 00:35:56 | |
| Pretty well on target for. | 00:35:58 | |
| Staying well under the Max where we want to be. | 00:36:00 | |
| Umm, with some tweaks we might be able to get into a. | 00:36:04 | |
| You know, .9 or something but. | 00:36:08 | |
| Well, I think someplace we might be able to tweak. | 00:36:10 | |
| Is the townships. | 00:36:14 | |
| Don't you agree, Andrew? | 00:36:16 | |
| Because I know we did the point O 3% so that. | 00:36:18 | |
| Franklin Township wouldn't drop below. | 00:36:22 | |
| What they're getting now, however. | 00:36:25 | |
| They will likely. | 00:36:30 | |
| Merge so. | 00:36:32 | |
| And the other town, the townships are getting quite a bit more. | 00:36:34 | |
| Than what they're getting now, so wonder if we tried? | 00:36:38 | |
| I don't know .01%. | 00:36:42 | |
| OK, there we go. So that would be. | 00:36:53 | |
| So yes, Franklin will drop down, but again, they're probably going to end up merging, so Georgetown's getting. | 00:36:57 | |
| 42,000 versus 24,000. Greenville's getting 20. | 00:37:04 | |
| 8000 versus $284, it's still still beneficial. I think that's as low as we can go as .01. | 00:37:08 | |
| So what do you all think about that? | 00:37:16 | |
| I'm good with that. | 00:37:23 | |
| Right. I mean they're. | 00:37:24 | |
| And we'll know before then. | 00:37:26 | |
| Yeah, they're going to merge, but they they most likely will be merging, probably with Georgetown. | 00:37:28 | |
| Umm. | 00:37:33 | |
| We can read, you know. | 00:37:37 | |
| Look at their books too to see. | 00:37:38 | |
| Cash on hand, but. | 00:37:40 | |
| We're talking about $10,000 difference their their budgets not. | 00:37:41 | |
| Extensive. Anyway. No, their budgets only $6600 and that really is just all Township administration, right? | 00:37:46 | |
| And that's the way with most townships other than New Albany towns, yeah. | 00:37:55 | |
| Yeah, so. | 00:37:59 | |
| Right. I mean, it's possible the other townships might have to merge as well. Yeah, so. | 00:37:59 | |
| Greenville Lafayette may merge as well. | 00:38:04 | |
| But. | 00:38:08 | |
| I like that scenario OK. | 00:38:11 | |
| Everybody but. | 00:38:13 | |
| Franklin is. | 00:38:14 | |
| Still ahead of where they currently are. | 00:38:15 | |
| By decent margins, so. | 00:38:18 | |
| OK. | 00:38:22 | |
| OK. | 00:38:23 | |
| All right. So the special districts, I think that's pretty. | 00:38:25 | |
| Well, at least the flood control is going to be pretty close to what they're getting now, and that's at .04%. You can't. | 00:38:32 | |
| Go above .05%. | 00:38:38 | |
| Any any thoughts there on the special districts for the solid waste and the flood control? | 00:38:42 | |
| Dollar basis to district, right. So the only one that would be addressed flood control and that's primarily developing city. | 00:38:49 | |
| So the solid waste doesn't doesn't need anymore. OK, I know you said that the last time and I just. | 00:38:58 | |
| It was strange that they still have a budget, but but they're dissolved at the end of this year. So they were absorbed by the | 00:39:05 | |
| county in February by coordinates. OK, beginning of the year they had their own district, their own gotcha, gotcha. | 00:39:12 | |
| OK, it's been a really fun year. | 00:39:19 | |
| So that said. | 00:39:22 | |
| Andrew, we could drop that rate then. | 00:39:24 | |
| I don't know what if it's like .02 because if you're only needing to fund. | 00:39:28 | |
| When you say absorb, does that mean the county needs some money? | 00:39:33 | |
| Now supports their own solid waste program. So they're they're back to being at county department, OK. | 00:39:40 | |
| OK. | 00:39:46 | |
| Yeah, I noticed that. I didn't know why they were getting lit. | 00:39:50 | |
| Last question, OK. | 00:39:53 | |
| Acid war because when I do that I open up what you need. | 00:39:55 | |
| It's awful. | 00:39:59 | |
| So at this point, it's supported by county budget, so any county. | 00:40:01 | |
| Rate that we choose is going to help cover that and right now we're covering. | 00:40:05 | |
| OK, perfect. Well then I think we can reduce that. | 00:40:09 | |
| Oh, yeah, true. OK. | 00:40:14 | |
| Perfect. | 00:40:16 | |
| So what do you think, Andrew? | 00:40:18 | |
| Yes. | 00:40:21 | |
| Yes. | 00:40:24 | |
| Mm-hmm. | 00:40:25 | |
| Coming out a little short. Oh, it is. | 00:40:39 | |
| Yeah, I see that. | 00:40:41 | |
| OK. | 00:40:48 | |
| I see. | 00:40:51 | |
| So that's too much of A drop. So .04% it looks like would. | 00:40:51 | |
| Be the neutral. | 00:40:55 | |
| OK, so we're just kind of working our way up here. We are at the library. | 00:41:00 | |
| I think we're pretty close to neutral there. Any thoughts on the library at .04%? | 00:41:06 | |
| Perfect. | 00:41:13 | |
| Is that good? | 00:41:14 | |
| Oh, OK, good. | 00:41:17 | |
| OK. Thanks for coming by the way. | 00:41:20 | |
| I'm going to move to the county unit. | 00:41:23 | |
| I know we do need to look at and I'm sorry I didn't bring that with me tonight, but I can get it to you after this meeting is. | 00:41:26 | |
| The county asked. | 00:41:32 | |
| You know how much? | 00:41:34 | |
| Money are we losing because of circuit breaker? | 00:41:35 | |
| And I don't know if you have that Andrew pulled up like. | 00:41:39 | |
| Like I guess I'm. | 00:41:43 | |
| I know we I just presented the FSP. | 00:41:45 | |
| I guess what my point? | 00:41:49 | |
| Is with us and you probably can't answer it today, but. | 00:41:51 | |
| You know the .6% is going to. | 00:41:54 | |
| Give you roughly what you're getting now. | 00:41:57 | |
| I guess the county will need to consider do you want to do? | 00:42:00 | |
| To make up for any revenue loss due to circuit breaker, but I will tell you this that we do anticipate that after 2030 circuit | 00:42:05 | |
| Breakers are going to start coming down. | 00:42:09 | |
| Umm, so I don't know how much you would really need to make up with the slit. | 00:42:16 | |
| But that is going to need to be a consideration. And because I don't have those numbers with me, you're not going to be able to | 00:42:21 | |
| get a picture of that unless Andrew can. | 00:42:25 | |
| Find that information. | 00:42:29 | |
| That total there under the 2030 estimated lead does that that that includes both the share of the municipal and the county | 00:42:32 | |
| services, yes. | 00:42:36 | |
| Yes, yes it is. It's both. | 00:42:40 | |
| Yeah. | 00:42:42 | |
| And again, it also depends if. | 00:42:47 | |
| The city OPS in or out? | 00:42:49 | |
| Because actually, if the city. | 00:42:51 | |
| Out, you're not even going to get. | 00:42:55 | |
| What you're getting now at .6, So we would have to. | 00:42:58 | |
| Of that. So I guess I'm going to move to the city now and. | 00:43:01 | |
| This I am going to put people in the spot and I guess you don't have to answer, that's up to you, but. | 00:43:05 | |
| We kind of need to know Georgetown, are you going to opt in or out at least just part of this plan? Again, non binding. | 00:43:09 | |
| Oh, I I think that we would opt in. OK, But New Albany, you don't, you don't probably don't know yet. | 00:43:16 | |
| OK. | 00:43:22 | |
| All right, so. | 00:43:24 | |
| We are. | 00:43:25 | |
| If we're going to develop a final plan, we will have to know something at some point. | 00:43:26 | |
| Or what I can do is. | 00:43:32 | |
| What we can do, but curtility, is prepare a plan where New Albany opts in, New Albany opts out, and then you vote. | 00:43:34 | |
| On one of those two plans. | 00:43:40 | |
| Oh, I'm sorry. | 00:43:44 | |
| Hello. | 00:43:44 | |
| Hi, I'm Oscar Gutierrez. | 00:43:45 | |
| Battery Consulting mutual advisor to New Albany. | 00:43:49 | |
| Our first meeting, we're catching up. We did run scenarios for. | 00:43:53 | |
| What it would look like for? | 00:43:57 | |
| New Albany to opt out. | 00:43:59 | |
| We have not. | 00:44:01 | |
| Had anything to go by to run a population based scenario? | 00:44:02 | |
| So I think before. | 00:44:07 | |
| Anything presents the mayor for a recommendation. Would like to. | 00:44:09 | |
| Work with Page directly to come up with a recommendation for the mayor. | 00:44:12 | |
| One of the things that. | 00:44:17 | |
| You know, I think we would also like to see as. | 00:44:19 | |
| The assessed values for all county for all county units. | 00:44:21 | |
| Going down as a result of SB1. | 00:44:25 | |
| That will have an effect beyond your circuit breaker. Circuit breaker will level off, but. | 00:44:28 | |
| Once the avenue stabilized, but. | 00:44:33 | |
| You know, I think one of the scenarios that. | 00:44:36 | |
| We will. | 00:44:38 | |
| Want to look at? | 00:44:38 | |
| For property tax. | 00:44:40 | |
| Replacement. This addresses lid replacement. We would like to see something that addresses lid replacement. | 00:44:43 | |
| But. | 00:44:50 | |
| We'll evaluate this and and get back to the group and obviously we will be. | 00:44:51 | |
| Cooperating to. | 00:44:55 | |
| Work with them. | 00:44:56 | |
| Is this something we think we can do before the next meeting? | 00:44:58 | |
| When is the next meeting? | 00:45:01 | |
| Is it next Thursday? | 00:45:04 | |
| Yeah, yeah, we. | 00:45:07 | |
| We can, but no promises. But yeah, obviously we we have to look at their assumptions and we, we have, we could we have a. | 00:45:10 | |
| So the next two Thursdays and then we have a two week gap and then we're scheduled. | 00:45:18 | |
| So in a month from now, it's gonna be the final. | 00:45:25 | |
| Correct. | 00:45:27 | |
| Yeah. We're not trying to finalize, no. | 00:45:28 | |
| We'll make ourselves available to make utility to. | 00:45:33 | |
| To run numbers and trying to have a recommendation for the mayor. | 00:45:36 | |
| And last question. | 00:45:43 | |
| Would there be any merit or usefulness in looking at the 2025 budget? | 00:45:45 | |
| You know, 2026 was unusual because of the new safety income taxes. Suddenly a value occurred. | 00:45:50 | |
| Until 20262025. | 00:45:57 | |
| You know, may look different now. | 00:45:59 | |
| I don't know what you know. You said these recurring expenses, what non recurring expenses? | 00:46:01 | |
| Like capital, anything that was capital related one time costs. | 00:46:07 | |
| OK. Because we had some of that last year, but I still think that it may be worthwhile to look at. | 00:46:11 | |
| Previous share numbers because we'd like to change last year. I mean I think for my calculation we have our budget went up about | 00:46:16 | |
| $7,000,000 from 20 to 26 or 20. | 00:46:21 | |
| Fine. And that was a code for safety tax and then I'll set some of the lost property tax. But I really think you'll get a little | 00:46:27 | |
| different picture if you pull in 25. | 00:46:31 | |
| Yeah, we can. We can if, if the task force would like for us to do that, we can. | 00:46:36 | |
| Show you a comparison of 2025 actual expenditures and 2026 budgeting. Did you all? Are you all making bond payments off of that? | 00:46:40 | |
| Lit umm. | 00:46:48 | |
| No, I mean I. | 00:46:54 | |
| I mean, we, we reallocated some things. So I mean, you know, we, we sort of did what you said. Look at the specific budget and the | 00:46:56 | |
| allocations of the department. So. | 00:47:00 | |
| You know the answer to yes, but not you know not. You wouldn't maybe see it on a line item or in the. | 00:47:04 | |
| But I mean as far as just overall. | 00:47:11 | |
| Expenditures, yeah, we're using, you know. | 00:47:13 | |
| Reduce lids like a sandwich. Property tax. | 00:47:16 | |
| I I had that conversation. | 00:47:21 | |
| I had that conversation OK. | 00:47:23 | |
| With the mayor. | 00:47:25 | |
| I did OK. | 00:47:26 | |
| So I'm I'm at the pleasure of the task force so. | 00:47:27 | |
| So here's. | 00:47:33 | |
| I think we've we've gone through a couple of these things. I feel like you maybe need a little bit more information you can tell | 00:47:36 | |
| me, but. | 00:47:39 | |
| I think we can put together 2 plans. | 00:47:42 | |
| 1 is. | 00:47:45 | |
| New Albany opts out. | 00:47:46 | |
| One New Albany OPS in, I think we've kind of got the rates. | 00:47:48 | |
| Pretty good. | 00:47:52 | |
| This is not final. We can come back with that. | 00:47:53 | |
| In a plan, May and. | 00:47:57 | |
| I will also bring with me. | 00:47:59 | |
| What the estimated circuit breaker? | 00:48:01 | |
| Credits look like from 2026 through 2031, just so you get an idea of that. | 00:48:05 | |
| Umm, trying to think of if there's anything else. Is there anything else you think? Do you want to see the cash balances of the | 00:48:13 | |
| other entities? | 00:48:17 | |
| I I tend to not look at that because. | 00:48:22 | |
| That's just kind of extra money and I realized that kind of is indicative of not. | 00:48:26 | |
| Not utilizing the funds, but. | 00:48:31 | |
| It's the recurring cost we really need to worry about. | 00:48:33 | |
| Covering. | 00:48:36 | |
| I don't need to see cash balances unless anybody else's. | 00:48:39 | |
| Request OK. | 00:48:42 | |
| Well, is there anything that I can provide to you at the next meeting that would help? | 00:48:44 | |
| That would help you or give you some clarity. | 00:48:49 | |
| Not that I can say. I mean, I think what you presented tonight is fantastic. | 00:48:56 | |
| OK. | 00:48:59 | |
| Breaks it down. | 00:49:00 | |
| Really nicely. I appreciate that this school system is a part of this and the libraries as well since they were both. | 00:49:01 | |
| Ended up in a situation where they weren't going to be funded and. | 00:49:09 | |
| You know fire as well so. | 00:49:13 | |
| I like that those are still included. | 00:49:16 | |
| And it is interesting to me with the townships. | 00:49:19 | |
| Yes. | 00:49:23 | |
| Umm, that those are, you know, pretty significantly higher numbers. | 00:49:24 | |
| It it is. | 00:49:29 | |
| The mergers. | 00:49:32 | |
| So when I come back, I am going to write that down. I can bring you. | 00:49:36 | |
| Preliminary scoring on all of the townships. When I come back, I'm positive New Albany Township will not be won. | 00:49:41 | |
| That has to merge, but those other ones I think are on. | 00:49:47 | |
| On the cusp and Franklin for sure, so I'll bring that with me next time. When will you know for sure in December? | 00:49:51 | |
| The Department of Local Government Finance will put out their final report. | 00:49:57 | |
| That shows exactly. | 00:50:01 | |
| Which townships will be required to merge? | 00:50:03 | |
| And then I believe it is a county commissioner function after that to determine the. | 00:50:06 | |
| Which were they? | 00:50:11 | |
| Who they should merge with because there are certain circumstances where they may have to merge with the municipality and other | 00:50:12 | |
| circumstances where it's with a Township that touches their boundaries. | 00:50:17 | |
| So we can, we can have a discussion about that at the next time. I, I should have had it this time. So I apologize, but I can | 00:50:23 | |
| certainly bring that next time. | 00:50:27 | |
| When When you come for the next meeting. | 00:50:32 | |
| Will we still be able to plug and play numbers? Absolutely. I'd like to see some of this different scenarios. Absolutely. | 00:50:35 | |
| Yes, nothing is finalized until you vote on it. We're just trying to move this down. | 00:50:43 | |
| The road to where we're getting some sort of. | 00:50:47 | |
| Plan together. | 00:50:51 | |
| Anything else that you want to cover? | 00:50:56 | |
| Everybody all good. | 00:51:03 | |
| Any questions, any final remarks or questions or? | 00:51:04 | |
| Information you need for the next meeting. | 00:51:09 | |
| OK. | 00:51:13 | |
| Thank you. | 00:51:14 | |
| Appreciate you. | 00:51:15 | |
| Would you all mind signing in? | 00:51:17 | |
| Yeah. | 00:51:23 |