MUST Phase 1 kickoff
Live stream not working or buffering in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| Thank you. | 00:00:03 | |
| So welcome to the first official meeting. | 00:00:05 | |
| Of the must. | 00:00:09 | |
| The municipal unit strategic task force and we do have everyone. | 00:00:11 | |
| Present that's on the task force, so that's much appreciated. | 00:00:15 | |
| We do have a sign in sheet coming around. | 00:00:19 | |
| I think most everyone is signed up, but I'll have you all sign it up. | 00:00:22 | |
| On the task force as well. | 00:00:25 | |
| Before you leave. | 00:00:27 | |
| So tonight. | 00:00:29 | |
| We're going to just talk about a few things. One is that we're going to recap a little bit of what was discussed at the last | 00:00:31 | |
| meeting. | 00:00:35 | |
| Well, the main thing that we're going to go over tonight is some foundational information for you. We did run a baseline financial | 00:00:39 | |
| analysis, so a local income tax analysis and I'm going to run through that with you and get your initial thoughts. | 00:00:47 | |
| Um, and then. | 00:00:56 | |
| There won't be a whole lot to discuss tonight beyond that, but again, this will be a good opportunity to give you some | 00:00:57 | |
| foundational information. | 00:01:01 | |
| So you can go to the next slide. | 00:01:06 | |
| So. | 00:01:09 | |
| We're going to go through just a recap of our initial session. We're going to review the process itself, the outcome of the | 00:01:11 | |
| process. | 00:01:15 | |
| We're going to establish some task force expectations, So what you can expect during each one of these meetings. | 00:01:20 | |
| We're going to review and approve the meeting schedule. We do have that set up right now, but if there's an issue, please let us | 00:01:27 | |
| know. | 00:01:31 | |
| We're going to present that preliminary financial modeling and just get your initial reactions. | 00:01:35 | |
| Next slide. | 00:01:41 | |
| Oh, I'm sorry. | 00:01:42 | |
| I'm sorry, I do have a clicker so I will do it myself. | 00:01:43 | |
| Thank you. | 00:01:46 | |
| So our objective, or the objective of the must is to evaluate. | 00:01:47 | |
| All of this information together there should be a collaborative effort. | 00:01:54 | |
| As you know, Banker Tilly is going to guide you through this process. | 00:01:58 | |
| Over the coming meetings, we are going to review the financial data. We're going to evaluate the service impacts to varying levels | 00:02:02 | |
| of. | 00:02:06 | |
| The various local government entities. So the next meeting. | 00:02:11 | |
| Baker Tilly will bring information about the budgets. | 00:02:16 | |
| And the local income tax revenues that are currently received by the other taxing units, the overlapping taxing units in the | 00:02:20 | |
| county. So the townships, yes, the municipalities, the schools, the libraries, so that you can see how. | 00:02:27 | |
| Those entities are currently funding their budgets and most importantly, how much local income tax are they using to fund their | 00:02:35 | |
| budgets? That's going to be very important for you all to know as you go into this process. | 00:02:41 | |
| We're going to discuss various allocation scenarios. So tonight. | 00:02:47 | |
| We're providing A baseline and we're assuming that the tax rates will be adopted at the Max. Certainly you don't have to do that, | 00:02:51 | |
| but this is a place for you for us to start. So you can see what that. | 00:02:56 | |
| Type of revenue, what would be generated under that? | 00:03:01 | |
| Scenario. | 00:03:05 | |
| We are going to assess long term sustainability now. We know there's going to be winners and losers. | 00:03:06 | |
| In this process. | 00:03:13 | |
| Or in the structure that you all agree upon. | 00:03:14 | |
| But we're going to try to. | 00:03:17 | |
| Come to some middle ground to where there is some. | 00:03:20 | |
| Sustainability there. | 00:03:23 | |
| We're going to develop some recommendations. So you as the task force will develop some recommendations. You will put that in. | 00:03:27 | |
| Report that we will submit to the DLG. | 00:03:34 | |
| So this next slide is the project. | 00:03:39 | |
| Road map and we did initially talk about it at the last meeting, but I want to quickly go through this with you. So this outlines | 00:03:44 | |
| each of the steps we we see this being. | 00:03:49 | |
| A4 phase process. | 00:03:54 | |
| So the initial phase was to have that work session. | 00:03:57 | |
| Where we kind of educated you on the legislative changes and we will continue that education process as we go through these must | 00:04:02 | |
| meetings. | 00:04:05 | |
| Phase 2 is the official formation of the task force, which that is our first session tonight. So you are officially formed as a | 00:04:10 | |
| task force. | 00:04:14 | |
| And everyone is here and present on that task force. | 00:04:19 | |
| After we go through some of these scenarios tonight, we're going to go right into the negotiation process, which really all that | 00:04:24 | |
| means is we're going to review. | 00:04:28 | |
| And evaluate. | 00:04:33 | |
| Scenarios. | 00:04:34 | |
| And try to determine. | 00:04:36 | |
| The best approach to this taxing structure starting in 2029. | 00:04:37 | |
| And then the final phase again is developing that formal report that we will submit to the Department of Local Government Finance, | 00:04:44 | |
| who will then. | 00:04:47 | |
| Submit that to the Legislative Council and all of that needs to be done prior to December the 1st. | 00:04:51 | |
| So this is the meeting schedule that we have. | 00:05:00 | |
| Put together, we want to try to stick to this meeting schedule because we have this room. | 00:05:02 | |
| That is. | 00:05:08 | |
| Scheduled and. | 00:05:10 | |
| Right now this seems to work best for everyone. | 00:05:12 | |
| So what I would say here is that. | 00:05:16 | |
| If. | 00:05:18 | |
| There's any task force members that cannot attend one of these meetings. You can designate someone to attend in your place as long | 00:05:19 | |
| as we're not going to be voting on anything that evening and honestly. | 00:05:25 | |
| The way I see this happening is you probably won't vote on anything until the very end. You'll vote on the report. | 00:05:31 | |
| Umm, that you're going to submit to the state, but. | 00:05:38 | |
| As we get through here, if you want to vote on various aspects of the report, we can certainly do that as well. | 00:05:41 | |
| Yes. | 00:05:48 | |
| You think these are all off by a day? | 00:05:52 | |
| Oh my gosh, yes, you're right. | 00:05:56 | |
| Hmm, OK. | 00:06:01 | |
| Sorry about that. | 00:06:02 | |
| We'll get that corrected. | 00:06:03 | |
| It's it's Thursday, so. | 00:06:06 | |
| Yeah. | 00:06:08 | |
| Yes. | 00:06:09 | |
| OK. Sorry about that. | 00:06:11 | |
| I don't know how that happened. | 00:06:13 | |
| I will correct the schedule and just send you out one schedule of the actual dates of the meetings. Apologize for that. | 00:06:15 | |
| I have no idea how that occurred. | 00:06:23 | |
| OK. | 00:06:27 | |
| Next slide. So this is the. | 00:06:29 | |
| The official task force roster, so obviously we have Danny Short as a representative of the County Council. | 00:06:31 | |
| Linda Mueller as the controller of New Albany, Julia Keebler as the clerk treasurer of Georgetown and Jack Trevillian as the clerk | 00:06:39 | |
| treasurer of Greenville. | 00:06:44 | |
| All right. So some expectations and protocols. We don't want this to be super formal. This is not like a council meeting or a | 00:06:55 | |
| board meeting. | 00:06:59 | |
| Uh, we want to have. | 00:07:03 | |
| You know, respectful conversations. We want to make sure that everyone's comfortable providing input, and that includes people in | 00:07:05 | |
| the audience as well. | 00:07:09 | |
| Obviously we want to get through our agenda items, but if anyone in the audience has questions or wants to provide input. | 00:07:13 | |
| I feel like that should be something that we can handle as long as. | 00:07:20 | |
| Time is permitting. | 00:07:24 | |
| All of the participants of the task force should commit. | 00:07:26 | |
| To attendance, hopefully again, if you cannot attend, you can designate someone that that is no problem as long as we're not | 00:07:29 | |
| committing to a vote that evening. | 00:07:34 | |
| Discussions should remain professional. Obviously, we know that each entity has their own unique priorities. | 00:07:39 | |
| Completely understand that, but what we want to try to guide you to. | 00:07:46 | |
| Is to take this approach that's county wide. We're trying to get a county wide plan for this local income tax structure. So we | 00:07:50 | |
| want to make sure that yes, we focus on the municipalities, we focus on the county, but we also need to remember the townships, | 00:07:56 | |
| the fire and EMS providers, the schools. | 00:08:02 | |
| So we will continue to bring the focus back to a county wide local income tax structure. | 00:08:09 | |
| Our goal is to share all the information. | 00:08:19 | |
| Prior to the meetings, we will send out the packets of information and the agenda. We've done that the last two meetings. We will | 00:08:22 | |
| continue to do that. | 00:08:26 | |
| And we're going to make sure that our discussions and the decisions we make and the report that we generate is grounded based on | 00:08:31 | |
| financial data. | 00:08:36 | |
| So again, that's where we come in. We can run as many scenarios as you would like. | 00:08:41 | |
| I can even bring in my computer and we can run live scenarios as we're going through the discussions. | 00:08:46 | |
| So as far as some meeting protocols. | 00:08:53 | |
| We're going to follow a structured agenda. | 00:08:57 | |
| And again, we will provide that in advance and that is to keep the conversation moving in the right direction. I'm sure the fewer | 00:09:00 | |
| of these meetings. | 00:09:04 | |
| As possible is going to be best for you. We don't want to have this go on through the end of October. | 00:09:09 | |
| So we're going to have structured meetings and we're going to have goals at each meeting and we're going to build on those | 00:09:15 | |
| meetings as we go. | 00:09:19 | |
| I know the statute, and I mentioned this the last time, requires unanimous approval of this document of this local income tax | 00:09:24 | |
| structure. | 00:09:28 | |
| But. | 00:09:33 | |
| If we don't get unanimous approval from the task force members, that's OK. | 00:09:34 | |
| We're still going to document that in a report and we're still going to submit that report because I that's going to be important | 00:09:39 | |
| information for the legislature to know why you didn't reach a consensus if that's the case. | 00:09:44 | |
| We know there will be competing viewpoints. We're going to try to summarize those as we get to those and circle back on them and | 00:09:51 | |
| again, try to find some common ground. | 00:09:56 | |
| Umm, we do recommend there's some sort of documented summary of each. | 00:10:03 | |
| Meeting it might be minutes or otherwise, but that's up to you if you want to do that. I don't this is being recorded right? | 00:10:08 | |
| Can we generate? | 00:10:15 | |
| Some summary or OK, well that's good enough then, as long as somebody can go back and look if they wanted to. | 00:10:16 | |
| About the meetings. | 00:10:23 | |
| The meeting information. | 00:10:25 | |
| All right, so we're going to dive right into the preliminary financial information, but. | 00:10:27 | |
| As a starting point. | 00:10:33 | |
| Um, we want to show you where you are right now. | 00:10:34 | |
| So. | 00:10:38 | |
| Floyd County has a total local income tax rate of one point. | 00:10:41 | |
| 8-9 percent. | 00:10:46 | |
| That is comprised of multiple buckets. And I know I went through this last time, but I just want to reiterate just so you can see | 00:10:48 | |
| what the starting point is. So they're certified chairs and remember that is deposited in the general fund of each taxing unit in | 00:10:53 | |
| the county. | 00:10:58 | |
| That rate is .75%. | 00:11:03 | |
| And it generates about 22.8 million. | 00:11:05 | |
| That 22.8 million is distributed to the units based on their proportionate share of property tax levy to the total levy. | 00:11:08 | |
| So if if one unit. | 00:11:17 | |
| Has. | 00:11:19 | |
| 30% of all levees in the county, they're going to get 30% of that 22.8 million. That's how that works now. | 00:11:20 | |
| How was that different to the new structure? Very different because. | 00:11:27 | |
| The new structure will be based primarily on population. | 00:11:31 | |
| So completely different allocation method. | 00:11:35 | |
| Public safety is a .5% rate and that is distributed only to the county unit. | 00:11:39 | |
| And the municipalities? | 00:11:45 | |
| And that is also distributed based on levy, your proportionate share of levy. | 00:11:47 | |
| Economic development. | 00:11:53 | |
| Also. | 00:11:54 | |
| Only distributed to the county unit and the municipalities. | 00:11:56 | |
| The adopted rate is .3%. It generates about $9.1 million. | 00:11:59 | |
| And although the name says it's for economic development, it can actually be used for any legal purpose of of the municipality or | 00:12:05 | |
| the county. | 00:12:09 | |
| Correctional Facility is very specific. | 00:12:14 | |
| Obviously can only be used in connection with the Correctional Facility. | 00:12:17 | |
| That .2%. | 00:12:21 | |
| The 6.1 million that it generates. | 00:12:22 | |
| All goes to the county unit of government. | 00:12:25 | |
| Judicial system, same thing. That all goes to the county unit of government. | 00:12:28 | |
| .04% is the rate and it generates 1.2 million. | 00:12:33 | |
| So those are the main expenditure rates. | 00:12:37 | |
| And in total there's 54 point. | 00:12:40 | |
| 4 million that is distributed to the units. | 00:12:43 | |
| And the county unit of government. | 00:12:47 | |
| That rate is 1.79%. Now the reason why I. | 00:12:50 | |
| Segregated out the expenditure lip. | 00:12:53 | |
| Is because those are true distributions to the units. | 00:12:56 | |
| There's also another form of local income tax here in this county. It's property tax relief. | 00:12:59 | |
| That rate is 0.1%. | 00:13:06 | |
| That isn't. | 00:13:08 | |
| Distributed. | 00:13:09 | |
| As. | 00:13:10 | |
| Local income tax to the units. Instead, it's distributed as part of the property tax distribution. | 00:13:11 | |
| So you don't necessarily see it. | 00:13:18 | |
| It just flows in with your property tax distribution, so. | 00:13:20 | |
| We're kind of setting that aside when we do this analysis tonight because that's not something that the units are using. | 00:13:24 | |
| That's specifically local income tax. It's basically property tax replacement. | 00:13:31 | |
| The taxpayers get a credit on their tax bills, and this is what funds that credit. | 00:13:35 | |
| Now it's important that you know that. | 00:13:41 | |
| All of these are going to expire at the end of 2028. | 00:13:42 | |
| So what that means is when property tax relief. | 00:13:48 | |
| Lit goes away. | 00:13:52 | |
| Pretty much all of the taxing units within this county is going to see some level of increase in property tax credits, so you'll | 00:13:55 | |
| see a reduction in property tax revenue. | 00:13:59 | |
| So we kind of have to think about that as we go through our meetings and our discussion because we need to try to replace that. | 00:14:05 | |
| Lost. | 00:14:12 | |
| Property tax revenue. | 00:14:13 | |
| With this local income tax. | 00:14:14 | |
| Alright, so now. | 00:14:18 | |
| As far as the new structure, again, I know this is repetitive, but I think it's important to go through this. | 00:14:20 | |
| The new structure is what we're seeing on this screen here. So we have a county services local income tax of 1.2%. | 00:14:27 | |
| That will be under the authority of the County Council. | 00:14:36 | |
| And that distribution will go directly to the county unit of government. | 00:14:40 | |
| To be used for anything that the county desires now. | 00:14:44 | |
| The county is going to need to use that to fund what's currently funded out of public safety. | 00:14:48 | |
| Economic development. | 00:14:53 | |
| Correctional Facility. Judicial. | 00:14:55 | |
| And the general fund. | 00:14:57 | |
| So that portion is going to need to cover those items that are currently paid from the current list structure. | 00:14:59 | |
| Fire and EMS is another bucket that. | 00:15:07 | |
| Is .4% as the maximum that is only to be distributed to fire and EMS providers? | 00:15:09 | |
| So that would be the county unit. | 00:15:17 | |
| The municipal fire department. | 00:15:19 | |
| The fire territories and districts within this county and certain townships. | 00:15:21 | |
| This distribution or this allocation is going to be based on whatever the County Council decides. | 00:15:27 | |
| So the County Council is going to have a lot of flexibility in determining how this will be distributed. | 00:15:34 | |
| The County Council does have to use a combination of service area square miles. | 00:15:40 | |
| And population. | 00:15:45 | |
| But you can do it 50506040, you can weight it different ways. You'll see in this initial analysis we waited at 5050. | 00:15:46 | |
| What we could run a lot of different scenarios to see but. | 00:15:55 | |
| You're not going to really know what the best waiting is until we provide you with. | 00:15:58 | |
| What all the fire departments are currently budgeting for services and what they're currently getting as revenue. So we're going | 00:16:02 | |
| to provide that. | 00:16:07 | |
| Uh, the next time around. | 00:16:11 | |
| Non municipal units. | 00:16:15 | |
| Although the maximum rate is .2%. | 00:16:17 | |
| You can only have a maximum of .05% for each unit. | 00:16:20 | |
| Type. So like the libraries for instance, you can only adopt A rate of .05% and then that's distributed out to the libraries based | 00:16:25 | |
| on population. | 00:16:30 | |
| Township same thing .05% for all the townships distributed based on population. | 00:16:35 | |
| And that is under the authority of the County Council. In fact, all of these are County Council, unless you you are New Albany who | 00:16:42 | |
| can adopt their own. And we'll get into that in a minute. | 00:16:47 | |
| So there is a county wide municipal services rate that the county can adopt. | 00:16:52 | |
| And that would go to all municipalities that are less than 3500 and population and also. | 00:16:59 | |
| To New Albany if they choose to opt. | 00:17:06 | |
| In so, New Albany has the ability to opt in to the county wide municipal rate. | 00:17:09 | |
| Or opt out and adopt their own. | 00:17:15 | |
| Each one of those rates are a maximum. | 00:17:18 | |
| Of 1.2%. But the big difference is this, If New Albany adopts their own rate at 1.2%, they're only going to be able to tax the | 00:17:20 | |
| adjusted gross income of those living within New Albany. | 00:17:27 | |
| While the county municipal services. | 00:17:33 | |
| County wide municipal services rate will be taxed on. | 00:17:37 | |
| The whole county. | 00:17:41 | |
| And less New Albany. | 00:17:43 | |
| OS out and then we would exclude that AGI because you you can't. | 00:17:44 | |
| As a taxpayer, pay 2 municipal lit rates. | 00:17:49 | |
| They do not stack. | 00:17:53 | |
| OK, so that that kind of. | 00:17:58 | |
| Now we can get into the financial analysis. | 00:18:00 | |
| All right. So we're going to start with the easiest one to calculate and that is the county services local income tax. | 00:18:05 | |
| So in the first column is the new lit structure. | 00:18:14 | |
| So we're estimating an adjusted gross income tax of about $3 billion. | 00:18:19 | |
| We have not included any growth in this. This is based on current because we just thought it would muddy the waters if we started | 00:18:26 | |
| including growth. Yes, I think your AGI is going to grow. | 00:18:31 | |
| But we want to compare apples to apples. | 00:18:36 | |
| So 3 billion. | 00:18:38 | |
| For the adjusted gross income county wide. | 00:18:40 | |
| The county can put on a maximum rate of 1.2%. | 00:18:43 | |
| That would generate $36.4 million and that. | 00:18:47 | |
| All would go to the county, so the county share would be the $36.4 million. | 00:18:51 | |
| Currently. | 00:18:57 | |
| The county's local income tax distribution. | 00:18:58 | |
| Is. | 00:19:01 | |
| $24.4 million. | 00:19:02 | |
| And that is derived from a 1.79% expenditure local income tax rate. | 00:19:05 | |
| Which generates in total. | 00:19:12 | |
| $54.4 million, but the distributions again are based on Levy, so out of that 54.4 million. | 00:19:13 | |
| The county unit gets 24.4 million. | 00:19:22 | |
| Now, that 24.4 million right now is comprised of certified shares. | 00:19:25 | |
| Public safety. | 00:19:30 | |
| Economic development. | 00:19:32 | |
| Judicial. | 00:19:33 | |
| Lit and correctional facilities. So it's not just the certified shares. | 00:19:34 | |
| So if the county would adopt the maximum. | 00:19:39 | |
| They would get an additional $12 million. That tells me likely the county may not need to adopt the maximum, but that's we're | 00:19:43 | |
| starting at the Max and then we can run various scenarios based on the county's needs. | 00:19:49 | |
| Moving on to. | 00:19:58 | |
| Municipal services. | 00:20:00 | |
| So again. | 00:20:03 | |
| We there is only one. | 00:20:05 | |
| Oh, I guess there's two. I'm sorry, I must have misspoke. OK, so there is 2, There's two municipalities that can opt in or out. | 00:20:07 | |
| Sorry about that town of Georgetown. | 00:20:12 | |
| And the city of New Albany. | 00:20:16 | |
| Um, so those two municipalities have the option to opt into the county wide. | 00:20:18 | |
| Or opt out. So we did run both options here. | 00:20:24 | |
| But before I get to that, I just want to. | 00:20:29 | |
| Go over a few assumptions so you know what's behind this analysis. | 00:20:32 | |
| So again, and I already said this, but we are. | 00:20:37 | |
| Using. | 00:20:41 | |
| Current adjusted gross income numbers of 2026 adjusted gross income numbers, we are not inflating them at all. | 00:20:42 | |
| That's something you need to know. | 00:20:50 | |
| We are also using the maximum amount that can be adopted. | 00:20:52 | |
| For these rates, just as a starting point. | 00:20:56 | |
| We're not building in, in, in any growth and population changes in salaries and wages or economic expansion because again. | 00:21:00 | |
| We are trying to show a fixed. | 00:21:08 | |
| Baseline. | 00:21:11 | |
| We are also using the 2020 US Census Bureau population because that is what is required of us by STAT. | 00:21:14 | |
| So those are just a few of the assumptions that you should know as we go into this. | 00:21:24 | |
| All right, so here is option one. | 00:21:30 | |
| This is New Albany and Georgetown opt in. So we're saying that they both opt in to the county wide municipal rate and we have 4. | 00:21:34 | |
| Different rate assumptions shown on here. Just so you can see the various levels, I'm just going to cover them. | 00:21:44 | |
| The maximum at this point, but you can see we did .1%. | 00:21:50 | |
| .5%. | 00:21:55 | |
| 1% and 1.21.2 is the maximum. | 00:21:56 | |
| So right now. | 00:22:00 | |
| Georgetown. | 00:22:02 | |
| Currently all the way to the far right. | 00:22:03 | |
| Is receiving about 434,000 in local income tax and that does include. | 00:22:06 | |
| Certified shares, public safety and economic development. We just lumped all of those together. | 00:22:12 | |
| If. | 00:22:18 | |
| If the county, the County Council adopts the maximum 1.2%. | 00:22:19 | |
| Georgetown could get. | 00:22:24 | |
| 2.6 million as a distribution. | 00:22:26 | |
| Of municipal lit. | 00:22:29 | |
| At 1%, it's 2.153 million. | 00:22:32 | |
| .5% about 1.1 million and then .1% would be lower than what Georgetown is getting now. | 00:22:36 | |
| Umm, Greenville. | 00:22:44 | |
| Would get about 927,000 under the Max. Greenville is currently getting about 28,000. | 00:22:46 | |
| So quite a bit more. | 00:22:54 | |
| Under the Max. | 00:22:56 | |
| Umm, then the city of New Albany they're getting right now, currently in 2026, they're getting 21.9 million of all those combined, | 00:22:58 | |
| so almost 22 million. | 00:23:05 | |
| Under the Max they would get 25.7 million. | 00:23:13 | |
| With 1% it would be a little bit lower than what they're receiving now. | 00:23:16 | |
| So you can see the various levels here. | 00:23:23 | |
| The all of the municipalities would benefit at either 1% or 1.2%. | 00:23:26 | |
| Now we're going to move on to the county unit. | 00:23:33 | |
| This is. | 00:23:37 | |
| The county unit actually gets 2 distributions. | 00:23:38 | |
| They get their county services distribution. | 00:23:41 | |
| But they also get a share of the county wide municipal local income tax. | 00:23:44 | |
| So if you look at the county unit. | 00:23:51 | |
| At 1.2%. | 00:23:53 | |
| Their municipal share. | 00:23:55 | |
| Is 7.2 million. | 00:23:58 | |
| The county services is 36. | 00:24:00 | |
| Point 4 million which we covered in the previous slide, so. | 00:24:03 | |
| If you compare that to what the county is getting now, 24.4 million, that's a quite a bit of an increase it would be. | 00:24:07 | |
| Oh, go ahead. | 00:24:14 | |
| Question. | 00:24:14 | |
| What is the makeup of the municipal allocation? What makes that out? | 00:24:15 | |
| The municipal lit like how is it determined? | 00:24:21 | |
| So the municipal lip. | 00:24:27 | |
| Are they're going to go to your general fund? | 00:24:29 | |
| That's where it will go. | 00:24:31 | |
| Yes. | 00:24:33 | |
| So these like, let's look at New Albany so. | 00:24:34 | |
| If the county would adopt the 1.2% you would get 25.7 million as a city. You can you have to deposit. | 00:24:37 | |
| All of that within your general fund. | 00:24:45 | |
| And that should then cover whatever you're paying now out of public safety. | 00:24:47 | |
| Economic development. | 00:24:51 | |
| And your certified chairs in your general fund. | 00:24:53 | |
| So the municipal. | 00:24:56 | |
| So in that. | 00:24:59 | |
| Option one. | 00:25:01 | |
| Mm-hmm 20 5. | 00:25:02 | |
| And then also in the seven. | 00:25:05 | |
| You would only get the 25.7 million. | 00:25:09 | |
| That that's all you would get. | 00:25:12 | |
| Yeah, it would just be the 25.7 million. | 00:25:14 | |
| Yep, now the county unit. | 00:25:17 | |
| Gets 2 shares. | 00:25:20 | |
| They'll get the 7.2 million plus the 36.4 million for a total of $43.7 million. | 00:25:21 | |
| That's if they adopt the 1.2 Max. | 00:25:30 | |
| So just. | 00:25:33 | |
| You know. | 00:25:34 | |
| Discussions and other must meetings that I've had. | 00:25:35 | |
| We've seen where the county kind of makes out way ahead if they adopt the Max. So this is where we can have some discussions | 00:25:39 | |
| depending on what level you want to go to. | 00:25:44 | |
| Do you want to try to be able to take some of that county distribution? | 00:25:50 | |
| And give it to the schools, for instance, who do not get distributions right now that's not permitted by the statute, but that is | 00:25:55 | |
| something that we can talk about if that interests you as we go down the line because. | 00:26:02 | |
| Right now the school doesn't have any. The schools do not have any opportunity of getting local income tax so. | 00:26:09 | |
| I guess. | 00:26:15 | |
| This kind of brings us to. | 00:26:16 | |
| Why we're doing this is to let the legislature know that some units. | 00:26:18 | |
| Are could potentially get way more lit than they need. | 00:26:22 | |
| While other units aren't getting enough. So how can we redistribute this? | 00:26:27 | |
| I think that should be part of our discussions as we go forward, even if the statute doesn't permit it now. | 00:26:32 | |
| That's something that we can put in the report so that the Legislature understands the dilemma. | 00:26:38 | |
| That there's an issue. | 00:26:44 | |
| Umm, now as we go through this process, we are going to look at taxpayer impacts. | 00:26:47 | |
| Because your rate right now. | 00:26:54 | |
| Is. | 00:26:56 | |
| 1.89%. | 00:26:58 | |
| Under this new. | 00:27:01 | |
| A taxpayer could potentially pay up to 2.9%. | 00:27:04 | |
| So that's a 1% increase. I don't know that the county is going to want. | 00:27:09 | |
| All of you. When I say the county, I mean. | 00:27:13 | |
| Everyone combined. I don't know that you want to go up to that Max, that is. | 00:27:15 | |
| Remains to be seen, but. | 00:27:19 | |
| We have to determine OK if you do want to go up to the Max or you want to increase it in some manner. | 00:27:21 | |
| How is that going to impact the taxpayer? | 00:27:26 | |
| So at least just for the municipal lid, I. | 00:27:29 | |
| Did put on the bottom line what the? | 00:27:32 | |
| What the rate is now remember 1.79% is the expenditure let that doesn't include PTRC. | 00:27:35 | |
| And then what would it look like? | 00:27:42 | |
| Just the municipal rate, this is not county, this is not all the let's combine. We're just looking at municipal rate right now. | 00:27:45 | |
| What would that look like for the taxpayer? Well. | 00:27:49 | |
| At the Max that would be 2.4%. | 00:27:53 | |
| You know, or you can go 2%, one percent, 1.3. There's going to be so many scenarios that we're going to be able to work through, | 00:27:58 | |
| but that's another aspect we need to think about. We need to think about. | 00:28:02 | |
| Can the units fund their services? | 00:28:07 | |
| Number one. | 00:28:10 | |
| #2 What is the impact on the taxpayer? | 00:28:11 | |
| When we make these changes to the let structure. | 00:28:15 | |
| So we're going to be looking at that as well. | 00:28:17 | |
| As we go through this process. | 00:28:20 | |
| Option number 2 is if. | 00:28:23 | |
| Both Georgetown and New Albany opt out. So another words. | 00:28:27 | |
| They adopt their own. | 00:28:33 | |
| Municipal rate. | 00:28:35 | |
| They're not a part of the county wide. | 00:28:36 | |
| So that just leaves Greenville. | 00:28:38 | |
| Well, what happens in that case is that actually? | 00:28:40 | |
| Causes Greenville to get a little bit more. | 00:28:43 | |
| It's not a whole lot more, but a little bit more. | 00:28:46 | |
| But it causes the county unit to get. | 00:28:48 | |
| A lot more. | 00:28:51 | |
| Umm, just. And that's just the formula that's in the statue. | 00:28:52 | |
| So. | 00:28:57 | |
| The whole point of this is to show you if one or both municipalities opt out and do their own rate, it does. | 00:28:59 | |
| 'Cause changes in what? | 00:29:07 | |
| The remaining units get. | 00:29:09 | |
| So with. | 00:29:13 | |
| With both of those opting out in the scenario, Greenville would get 1.2 again. They're currently getting 28,000. | 00:29:14 | |
| The Floyd County unit in total would get 58.2 million. They currently receive 24.4 million, so quite a bit of a difference there. | 00:29:22 | |
| But that. | 00:29:32 | |
| Kind of tells us that you probably aren't going to need to go to the maximum rates in this county. | 00:29:33 | |
| Which is probably a good thing, but again. | 00:29:38 | |
| We're we're far away from really developing that structure as of now. This is just kind of to. | 00:29:42 | |
| Get you started. | 00:29:48 | |
| So. | 00:29:51 | |
| If New Albany. | 00:29:52 | |
| Opts out of the county wide rate and they adopt their own rate. This is what it would generate in that first column. | 00:29:54 | |
| We have estimated. | 00:30:02 | |
| That the adjusted gross income within the city of New Albany is about $933 million. | 00:30:03 | |
| If. | 00:30:13 | |
| The city adopts the maximum of 1.2 million. That would generate approximately $11.2 million. | 00:30:13 | |
| So. | 00:30:23 | |
| The Cur. | 00:30:26 | |
| So $11.2 million, that's what it would generate just for the city of New Albany. | 00:30:28 | |
| Currently, the city of New Albany's distribution is 21.9 million. | 00:30:32 | |
| The total shares that are. | 00:30:38 | |
| Generated as 47.1 million, but New Albany only gets a portion of that because, again, it's based on levy allocation. | 00:30:41 | |
| So you can see that if the city. | 00:30:49 | |
| Opts out there, they would get considerably less, about $10.76 million less. | 00:30:51 | |
| This is not unusual to see the situation and that and in fact that's why the legislation was changed because what we found. | 00:30:58 | |
| Through through many of the counties in the state, there were some larger municipalities that if they adopted their own rate, that | 00:31:07 | |
| just wasn't going to be enough. | 00:31:11 | |
| That's a smaller tax base than if we do a county wide municipal rate. | 00:31:15 | |
| If we look at Georgetown. | 00:31:22 | |
| With Georgetown, we're estimating an adjusted gross income of about $188.6 million. | 00:31:26 | |
| At the maximum rate of 1.2%, that would generate about 2.3 million or 2.262. | 00:31:34 | |
| A million. | 00:31:42 | |
| And that would all go to Georgetown. | 00:31:43 | |
| Currently Georgetown. | 00:31:46 | |
| Is about 434,000 so Georgetown would actually come out. | 00:31:48 | |
| Ahead in this situation. | 00:31:54 | |
| And again, it goes back to distributions based on Levy. | 00:31:56 | |
| Versus population. | 00:32:02 | |
| That's why there's a big swing there. | 00:32:04 | |
| So when you think about it. | 00:32:06 | |
| New Albany is. | 00:32:08 | |
| Probably. | 00:32:10 | |
| Pretty high if you could. Well, we know it is. It's higher than Georgetown and Greenville. | 00:32:11 | |
| Umm, but then when you flip it to population. | 00:32:16 | |
| It's and look at all the population it's. | 00:32:20 | |
| The distribution isn't favoring. | 00:32:23 | |
| New Albany, but it is favoring Georgetown. | 00:32:25 | |
| So that's why this is kind of fluctuating back and forth, but this should give you a good idea of what's happening here. | 00:32:28 | |
| So now we're going to look at the non municipal units. | 00:32:36 | |
| So you've got, let's see, it looks like 4 categories of non municipal units in this county. You've got townships. You've got, | 00:32:41 | |
| let's see, about 5 different townships. | 00:32:47 | |
| Remember that. | 00:32:54 | |
| You, the council the County Council is going to be able to adopt A maximum rate of. | 00:32:55 | |
| .05. | 00:33:00 | |
| Per unit type. | 00:33:01 | |
| It is .2% in total. | 00:33:03 | |
| But by unit type it's .05%. So if you take that .05% and apply it to the county wide adjusted gross income. | 00:33:06 | |
| That should generate about 1.5 million for the townships. | 00:33:15 | |
| OK, but then. | 00:33:20 | |
| It gets divvied up among the townships based on their population. | 00:33:22 | |
| So if you look, Franklin Township 29,000, Georgetown Township 210,000. | 00:33:28 | |
| Greenville Township 143,000, Lafayette Township 155,000 and the New Albany Township, who has the largest population 981,000. | 00:33:35 | |
| And we can compare that. | 00:33:46 | |
| With what these townships are currently receiving and local income tax. | 00:33:47 | |
| And the townships actually make out. | 00:33:52 | |
| Pretty good, right? | 00:33:54 | |
| And again, this would be at the Max, so maybe you don't want to go to the Max but. | 00:33:55 | |
| All of these townships end up getting distributions that are larger than what they are receiving now. You can see the estimated | 00:34:00 | |
| change in the allocation. It's about 1.3 million in total. | 00:34:05 | |
| That would be more going to the townships and then what they're getting now. | 00:34:11 | |
| You only have one library. | 00:34:16 | |
| That this would apply to. So the .05% everything that's generated by that library, non municipal lit 1.5 million would all go to | 00:34:19 | |
| the New Albany Floyd County Public Library. | 00:34:25 | |
| That's a $355,000 increase, again at the Max. | 00:34:31 | |
| 355,000. | 00:34:35 | |
| Umm, you also have a New Albany flood control and because that. | 00:34:38 | |
| Special district has a property tax levy. They would be able to get a share of this Non municipal lit. | 00:34:43 | |
| Again .05% that would all go to the flood control. | 00:34:50 | |
| 1.5 million they currently get. | 00:34:55 | |
| About $1,000,000. So that's about a $492,000 increase. | 00:34:58 | |
| And then you have another special unit, the Floyd County Solid Waste. | 00:35:03 | |
| Would would have the allocation of the point. | 00:35:07 | |
| .05%. | 00:35:11 | |
| Yes. | 00:35:13 | |
| Dissolved in districts in February, so no longer loving taxes. | 00:35:16 | |
| OK, we will make that correction then. | 00:35:21 | |
| Because if they don't levy attacks, they're not. | 00:35:23 | |
| They cannot be get this. | 00:35:26 | |
| Oh, OK. | 00:35:28 | |
| OK. | 00:35:32 | |
| No, that's OK. That's probably not have a small Parks Department. | 00:35:33 | |
| Small wedding. | 00:35:37 | |
| I was thinking we had a special special park district that would be fall under the cities levees. | 00:35:39 | |
| If it's a City Park district, it would fall under the city levels. It's a. | 00:35:47 | |
| Yes, but. | 00:35:53 | |
| The way you have to. | 00:35:54 | |
| A special unit is defined as a standalone legal entity in the park District is under the city. Yeah, yeah. | 00:35:56 | |
| OK. | 00:36:08 | |
| So now the fire EMS. This is probably one that is going to require the most. | 00:36:09 | |
| Time. | 00:36:15 | |
| And attention. | 00:36:16 | |
| To determine because there's a lot of moving parts. | 00:36:18 | |
| So with fire and EMS, the maximum rate that can be adopted is .4%. | 00:36:23 | |
| But the way that it's allocated to these providers? | 00:36:28 | |
| Is something that the County Council will need to determine and actually the task force will determine that during this process. | 00:36:32 | |
| We will put that in the report. So I know the County Council will ultimately adopt it, but this should be a part of the report. | 00:36:38 | |
| How you all decide is the best way to distribute this. | 00:36:44 | |
| So just to let you know, here's how we went about the baseline. | 00:36:50 | |
| So this has to go to fire and EMS providers. | 00:36:55 | |
| So what we first did is we looked at the budgets, the combined budgets of all the fire providers. | 00:36:59 | |
| And EMS providers. | 00:37:05 | |
| And I want to make sure before I go on, are these are all still the current EMS providers I have American Medical Response, no. | 00:37:08 | |
| Are we already? | 00:37:17 | |
| So current, yes. | 00:37:18 | |
| Future No. | 00:37:21 | |
| OK. | 00:37:22 | |
| What Highlander Fire Protection districts? | 00:37:24 | |
| Won't really be providing EMS as standalones anymore there OK EMS taking place. | 00:37:27 | |
| So the contracts that we hold with America and Highlander expired at the end of this year. They won't. The commissioners have | 00:37:34 | |
| expressed that they will not be renewing it because we are building. | 00:37:38 | |
| A county wide EMS OK and I believe it is a firebase EMS. | 00:37:43 | |
| I. | 00:37:47 | |
| I have been involved in these meetings but I'm starting to go on overload with the absorption of information. So it is a Firebase | 00:37:48 | |
| EMS. | 00:37:52 | |
| And there's a lot of things changing between now and next year that have to do with not just our fire districts, but also our EMS. | 00:37:56 | |
| OK. | 00:38:04 | |
| So. | 00:38:09 | |
| Yes. Future no. | 00:38:10 | |
| OK, well, that's good to know. So. | 00:38:11 | |
| Is it fair to say that there will be just one county wide EMS or is that American Medical still going to be? | 00:38:14 | |
| I don't believe is participating in the county wide EMS. | 00:38:21 | |
| Correct. So you'll have, you'll have a vendor for New Albany, OK. | 00:38:24 | |
| Gotcha. | 00:38:29 | |
| Well, that you do use my Pro. Oh gotcha. OK. | 00:38:30 | |
| So that will make it a little bit easier if it's narrowed down to just two. | 00:38:35 | |
| But let me make. | 00:38:39 | |
| Some notes, yeah. | 00:38:40 | |
| And also the Highlander Fire Protection District. | 00:38:41 | |
| Is joining the territory. | 00:38:46 | |
| Yeah, there's a lot of changes happening in the. | 00:38:47 | |
| So yes. | 00:38:49 | |
| To look at that with. | 00:38:51 | |
| A full territory. | 00:38:53 | |
| For the whole town, yeah. | 00:38:55 | |
| Still be out of that so you'll you'll have 21 fire county wide EMS and the New Albany city as a standalone for both of those. | 00:38:59 | |
| So really what we're going to have is the Floyd County Fire Protection territory we had, we have. | 00:39:05 | |
| Highlander. Oh, I'm sorry, Highlander. | 00:39:11 | |
| Kind of listed twice there, but really it's the Floyd County Fire Protection territory, the New Albany Fire Department and then | 00:39:15 | |
| the county wide EMS and New Albany will be contracting with America Pro. | 00:39:21 | |
| Got it. OK. | 00:39:27 | |
| So first what we did at least in this analysis which we will update is that we looked at what is the county wide budget. | 00:39:29 | |
| For all of fire and EMS services and the county. | 00:39:39 | |
| Currently. | 00:39:42 | |
| Then we tried to determine. | 00:39:45 | |
| Of that. | 00:39:47 | |
| Combined budget? How much of that is EMS? | 00:39:48 | |
| So what we roughly calculated is 12% of that entire budget is EMS funding. Now obviously that's going to completely change. | 00:39:52 | |
| And again, this is just an illustration. So what we did is we looked at OK. | 00:40:02 | |
| .4%. | 00:40:06 | |
| Generates about. | 00:40:08 | |
| You know, over 11,000,000, almost $12 million. | 00:40:10 | |
| We we took off the top 12% of that and just allocated it to the EMS providers. | 00:40:13 | |
| Then we allocated the rest 88% to the fire. You don't have to do it this way, but this is kind of how we did it. We can talk | 00:40:21 | |
| about. | 00:40:24 | |
| Better ways to do it or what you think might be best, but again, this was just a starting point. | 00:40:28 | |
| Then we took those buckets like the 10.69 million that we allocated just a fire. | 00:40:34 | |
| We then used Service area population. | 00:40:40 | |
| And service area square. | 00:40:45 | |
| Square miles. | 00:40:47 | |
| And we? | 00:40:49 | |
| Awaited those 5050. | 00:40:51 | |
| Again, just a starting point, but. | 00:40:54 | |
| I guess the point of all this is that you can see that these scenarios can change. | 00:40:56 | |
| Drastically depending on how you weight those and how much you want to allocate EMS. Now we could just throw EMS. | 00:41:01 | |
| Into the bucket with fire. | 00:41:07 | |
| And just allocate it a straight 5050 or 6040 however you want to do it. | 00:41:10 | |
| Right now. | 00:41:16 | |
| You know these at least the. | 00:41:18 | |
| Fire territory. The Districts. | 00:41:20 | |
| The districts, I should say the FIRE districts as they are now not combined do get shares of local income tax. So the next time I | 00:41:23 | |
| come to the meeting, we're going to show you a comparison of. | 00:41:28 | |
| What they receive now. | 00:41:33 | |
| And then we'll work through some scenarios of what they might receive under this. | 00:41:35 | |
| Structure to see if it's enough to cover their needs. | 00:41:39 | |
| So this one is probably going to be the most complex to work through is the fire and EMS. It's not as straightforward. | 00:41:44 | |
| And there are a lot. | 00:41:52 | |
| Of decisions that. | 00:41:53 | |
| The council will need to make but. | 00:41:54 | |
| I say Council, under this must process, you all will need to make that, but we, we can help you and guide you through that | 00:41:57 | |
| process. | 00:42:00 | |
| I have a question. | 00:42:04 | |
| Mm-hmm. | 00:42:06 | |
| How does How do you later on? | 00:42:08 | |
| The property tax. | 00:42:11 | |
| So that you are adding. | 00:42:13 | |
| Uh, the lead and the property tax together to get to a total budget and I don't see anything in here. | 00:42:16 | |
| That sort of layers look to together. | 00:42:23 | |
| So. | 00:42:25 | |
| As far as LIT is concerned, we can show you what the potential losses of property tax are from Sea One. | 00:42:27 | |
| And then from that we can determine what rate do you want to set these local income taxes at to cover those potential losses? | 00:42:35 | |
| If you're going to try to use local income tax as a property tax replacement. | 00:42:42 | |
| We're we can provide that information to you. | 00:42:47 | |
| What are other counties doing that? | 00:42:50 | |
| I have some moscavities that do want to do that. Others are saying we don't want this to be used as a form of property tax | 00:42:53 | |
| replacement. So it's really up to what you want to do. I can next time bring you. | 00:42:58 | |
| What we estimate is the loss due to Sea One. | 00:43:04 | |
| And filling in that loss now I will say. | 00:43:08 | |
| We have. | 00:43:11 | |
| Then running parcel level analysis. | 00:43:12 | |
| And what's interesting is, yes, the property tax credits do go up. | 00:43:15 | |
| And 2728. | 00:43:20 | |
| When we get to 29, there's as a. | 00:43:23 | |
| Significant bump because your PTRC is going to go away, but then guess what happens? It starts coming back down. | 00:43:26 | |
| The property tax credits actually start coming back down after 2029. | 00:43:32 | |
| Why is that? Because. | 00:43:37 | |
| That of the changes and not assess value, and the growth and not assess value. | 00:43:39 | |
| What we're finding is. | 00:43:43 | |
| There's not a whole lot of property tax relief provided from this bill. | 00:43:44 | |
| Surprise, surprise. | 00:43:50 | |
| So yes, we we could provide that information. It is important. I agree. It's important. It's important. | 00:43:54 | |
| Relevant. It is relevant. | 00:43:59 | |
| It is relevant. | 00:44:02 | |
| That'll show the impacts to. | 00:44:04 | |
| Oh, absolutely. | 00:44:06 | |
| Absolutely. | 00:44:08 | |
| Yup. | 00:44:09 | |
| Yes, we can show that I'm sure we want property tax relief. Or do we just want to understand what the. | 00:44:11 | |
| So you add your lead, your property tax together, you know your total budget. Make sure that. | 00:44:19 | |
| Got the money that you need, right? The sustainability. | 00:44:24 | |
| To cover whatever budget you have. | 00:44:28 | |
| That's the my simple mind. Mm-hmm. | 00:44:33 | |
| Some some committees are looking at that and def. I mean. | 00:44:41 | |
| I'm at the whim of what? | 00:44:45 | |
| What you would like to see? So yes, I do agree that's important and we can bring that the next time we we come. | 00:44:47 | |
| But you want to see what the losses are. | 00:44:55 | |
| Yeah. And I, I don't think the losses are as significant as we had originally. | 00:44:58 | |
| Thought but. | 00:45:02 | |
| There are additional losses. | 00:45:04 | |
| That, umm. | 00:45:07 | |
| So moving on to the next slide. | 00:45:09 | |
| So we this is a. | 00:45:15 | |
| Overall summary. | 00:45:17 | |
| Of what I just talked about. | 00:45:19 | |
| OK, but I thought it was. | 00:45:21 | |
| Kind of an easy way to look at this. I think it goes on. Yeah, 2 pages. | 00:45:23 | |
| But what you're seeing here is in the first column. Here's what all these units currently receive. | 00:45:28 | |
| And local income tax. | 00:45:35 | |
| That's current so you can see. | 00:45:38 | |
| Comparison. | 00:45:40 | |
| The next column is the estimated local income tax at the Max. So something I want to bring your attention to right now is that the | 00:45:42 | |
| first column is 1.79%. | 00:45:47 | |
| That's all your local income taxes except for the PTRC. We set that aside for now, but if you want to know what the PTRC rate is. | 00:45:53 | |
| Included with this, it's about 1.89%. | 00:46:00 | |
| OK, so these are the expenditure lids 1.79%. | 00:46:03 | |
| At the Max, not any single taxpayer can pay more than 2.9%. | 00:46:08 | |
| But there could be some taxpayers that pay something different depending on where they live. | 00:46:14 | |
| So, for instance, if Georgetown goes out on their own and adopts their own lit. | 00:46:20 | |
| And let's say they don't adopt the Max, they adopt .9%. | 00:46:25 | |
| But. | 00:46:29 | |
| The county. | 00:46:30 | |
| Does the county wide municipal. | 00:46:32 | |
| At 1.2%. | 00:46:34 | |
| If I live in Georgetown, I'm going to pay lower. | 00:46:36 | |
| Total local income tax rate in that example than I would if I live. | 00:46:39 | |
| Somewhere else. | 00:46:43 | |
| In the county. | 00:46:45 | |
| That is completely different than what we know today, because today. | 00:46:46 | |
| Every person that lives in this county pays the exact same local income tax rate. | 00:46:50 | |
| We could have a situation where. | 00:46:55 | |
| A taxpayer might pay a different rate. | 00:46:58 | |
| Now, if you all strongly feel that everyone should pay the exact same rate, we'll try to structure it that way. | 00:47:01 | |
| But I want you to know that it is possible. | 00:47:07 | |
| That you could have people paying different rates. | 00:47:10 | |
| We also. | 00:47:15 | |
| On the. | 00:47:17 | |
| 4th column over the second to. | 00:47:18 | |
| Second column from the end. | 00:47:21 | |
| Of the right hand side. | 00:47:23 | |
| We tried to tell you what would be a neutral break even rate. Now, not everybody is breaking even here. | 00:47:26 | |
| But this was as close as we could get, so if you wanted. | 00:47:34 | |
| Everyone. | 00:47:37 | |
| To get about what they're receiving now again, we couldn't make it perfect because we can't. | 00:47:38 | |
| Give different rates to each taxing unit. We could only do it by grouping. | 00:47:44 | |
| We are looking at a rate of about 2.23%. | 00:47:49 | |
| And that doesn't. | 00:47:53 | |
| Include. | 00:47:54 | |
| Trying to make up for losses on. | 00:47:55 | |
| The sea. | 00:47:59 | |
| Stuff. | 00:48:00 | |
| So. | 00:48:02 | |
| Again. | 00:48:03 | |
| As close as we could get, 2.23% would be sort of breaking even, but again, not everybody is going to break even. | 00:48:05 | |
| I think. | 00:48:13 | |
| You know the townships make out. | 00:48:13 | |
| Pretty well, I think. | 00:48:15 | |
| And some of the other units. | 00:48:18 | |
| But I don't want to lose sight, and I've said this a couple times of. | 00:48:20 | |
| The units that don't get local income. | 00:48:25 | |
| Primarily the school. | 00:48:27 | |
| So the other Musk. | 00:48:29 | |
| Committee that I'm working with right now, they are all feel very strongly that the school needs to get a distribution somehow, | 00:48:31 | |
| some way, whether that's an interlocal agreement. | 00:48:36 | |
| Or building in some sort of ability to have a rate for the schools right now that's not in the statute. | 00:48:41 | |
| Not to my knowledge. | 00:48:58 | |
| Yeah, local income tax is not the only source. They do get property tax, but that is getting reductions just like all of you from | 00:49:02 | |
| Sea One. | 00:49:07 | |
| But here's the hope. | 00:49:12 | |
| That when we turn in these reports. | 00:49:14 | |
| The the must committees that did include something for the schools. What that something is remains to be seen. | 00:49:17 | |
| We hope that the Legislature will take that under consideration as they go into the 2027 legislative session. | 00:49:23 | |
| We This is the first time we've. | 00:49:31 | |
| Have been able to provide input. | 00:49:33 | |
| Before legislative session. | 00:49:35 | |
| No. | 00:49:39 | |
| No, I don't know if the. | 00:49:40 | |
| If any schools. | 00:49:42 | |
| There's nothing right now. | 00:49:44 | |
| Mm-hmm. My CFO, no other. | 00:49:47 | |
| This is the only Ave. that they that they've provided us and even then. | 00:49:50 | |
| They said there's no guarantees. Obviously it's up to the up to the group. So the only, the only thing that we've heard is if you | 00:49:55 | |
| want more money, you have to referendum so. | 00:49:59 | |
| That's that's what they tell us so. | 00:50:04 | |
| We certainly don't want to do that. We don't have to. | 00:50:06 | |
| Because that's outside the taxi. | 00:50:09 | |
| So again, that's where it comes back to let's think of the county holistically. | 00:50:16 | |
| And and that's what you all should be doing. | 00:50:21 | |
| And then this last page is just a continuation of the libraries and the special units and the fire and EMS providers and again, | 00:50:25 | |
| trying to. | 00:50:29 | |
| Get as neutral as possible over to the far right. But then you can also see the comparison as we saw in the previous slides of. | 00:50:33 | |
| Here's what these units are getting now. | 00:50:38 | |
| Umm, and then what they would get going into the future? | 00:50:44 | |
| The next slide is just some assumptions we use. I already talked about that as I went through the slide. So here is the tax. | 00:50:52 | |
| Liability impact Just an illustration of what we. | 00:51:00 | |
| Have put together thus far because I just want you to get an idea of what. | 00:51:03 | |
| The taxpayers currently pay under your current local income tax structure and what it might look like. | 00:51:08 | |
| Under an alternate. | 00:51:15 | |
| Income tax structure. | 00:51:17 | |
| So in this county, from the data that we could find in the US Census Bureau, the adjusted gross income in this county is about | 00:51:19 | |
| 79,000. The average adjusted gross income. If you think that's high on the high side, we also did provide some other some other | 00:51:24 | |
| examples. | 00:51:30 | |
| So let's start with this $40,000 adjusted gross income. | 00:51:36 | |
| So this would be what you pay your taxes on. | 00:51:40 | |
| Umm, under the current structure. | 00:51:45 | |
| This person would pay $756 from a whole year but. | 00:51:47 | |
| Monthly from the paycheck it would be $63. That's current. | 00:51:52 | |
| If you went to the maximum. | 00:51:56 | |
| This person would pay an additional $400.00 a year or an additional $34 a month. So it would go from $756 to $1160. That would be | 00:51:59 | |
| the Max. | 00:52:05 | |
| But under that neutral. | 00:52:12 | |
| Um, the increase would be about $136 or monthly about $11.00 increase per month. | 00:52:14 | |
| That just gives you kind of a flavor of how this might impact someone. Now we'll look at the $79,000 one. Currently, that person | 00:52:21 | |
| pays about $1500 annually, which is about $124.00 a month. | 00:52:28 | |
| If if you would go to the maximum, that would be an increase of almost $800. | 00:52:35 | |
| Or $67 a month. | 00:52:40 | |
| Under the neutral plan. | 00:52:42 | |
| That would be an additional $269 or $22.00 for the mom. | 00:52:45 | |
| So you can see the other examples there. | 00:52:50 | |
| So we are going to be mindful as we go through this process how it impacts the taxpayer as well. | 00:52:52 | |
| And we will include that in the report. | 00:52:59 | |
| Any questions about that before I move on? | 00:53:04 | |
| So that really concludes the financial portion of it as we move forward. | 00:53:08 | |
| We really need to look at which services or operations appear to be most sensitive to the allocation changes. | 00:53:15 | |
| You know the townships. | 00:53:24 | |
| I think they kind of make out ahead, but we're, we're, I think we're going to see some sensitivity is maybe with the fire and EMS. | 00:53:27 | |
| And. | 00:53:34 | |
| Potentially with municipalities depending on whether the two opt in or out. | 00:53:35 | |
| What additional information may be needed when I come next time I am going to have? | 00:53:41 | |
| The budgets of all of the overlapping units, the revenues of the overlapping units, so you can see how they're funding things now, | 00:53:46 | |
| not detail, but just. | 00:53:50 | |
| Big picture. And then how much? | 00:53:55 | |
| Of the local income tax is funding each of the units because with townships. | 00:53:58 | |
| Most of their fire services are funded with local income tax, so you need to have an understanding of that and we will provide | 00:54:03 | |
| that. | 00:54:07 | |
| Umm, what long term concerns should we be incorporating into the future scenarios unlike Denise mentioned? | 00:54:10 | |
| We will incorporate the potential impact of Sea One with the property tax loss or the revenue decline. | 00:54:19 | |
| Property tax revenue decline due to the phase in of the credits through Sea One. | 00:54:27 | |
| And then whatever additional assumptions you want to be included, we will include those. | 00:54:33 | |
| So the next steps really is to. | 00:54:40 | |
| Kind of review the information that I provided to you. | 00:54:43 | |
| Be thinking about. | 00:54:47 | |
| Things that. | 00:54:49 | |
| Maybe you want Baker Tilly to provide other than what I mentioned so far, so maybe I should start out with that. | 00:54:50 | |
| Will the information that I said I would bring next time, will that be sufficient for us to have some conversations about? | 00:54:56 | |
| Where we want to go? | 00:55:03 | |
| What? That's OK. | 00:55:04 | |
| Any other items you think would be helpful as you? | 00:55:07 | |
| Walk through this. | 00:55:12 | |
| Could you provide something? | 00:55:19 | |
| I was gonna ask if there's anything that I know Chris Street will be here next time with my CFO, be with me next time. We've done | 00:55:23 | |
| some significant deep dives with some different. | 00:55:27 | |
| With some, with some. | 00:55:32 | |
| Financials as far as. | 00:55:33 | |
| How I see a one is affecting us. | 00:55:34 | |
| How this this the lift? | 00:55:37 | |
| Mm-hmm. Affecting us, but then also we've got a third that's going to kick in too, where we share. | 00:55:39 | |
| A lot of our operations dollars with. | 00:55:43 | |
| Some charter schools in the area as well. So those are changes we're getting. | 00:55:46 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Thank you. | 00:00:03 | |
| So welcome to the first official meeting. | 00:00:05 | |
| Of the must. | 00:00:09 | |
| The municipal unit strategic task force and we do have everyone. | 00:00:11 | |
| Present that's on the task force, so that's much appreciated. | 00:00:15 | |
| We do have a sign in sheet coming around. | 00:00:19 | |
| I think most everyone is signed up, but I'll have you all sign it up. | 00:00:22 | |
| On the task force as well. | 00:00:25 | |
| Before you leave. | 00:00:27 | |
| So tonight. | 00:00:29 | |
| We're going to just talk about a few things. One is that we're going to recap a little bit of what was discussed at the last | 00:00:31 | |
| meeting. | 00:00:35 | |
| Well, the main thing that we're going to go over tonight is some foundational information for you. We did run a baseline financial | 00:00:39 | |
| analysis, so a local income tax analysis and I'm going to run through that with you and get your initial thoughts. | 00:00:47 | |
| Um, and then. | 00:00:56 | |
| There won't be a whole lot to discuss tonight beyond that, but again, this will be a good opportunity to give you some | 00:00:57 | |
| foundational information. | 00:01:01 | |
| So you can go to the next slide. | 00:01:06 | |
| So. | 00:01:09 | |
| We're going to go through just a recap of our initial session. We're going to review the process itself, the outcome of the | 00:01:11 | |
| process. | 00:01:15 | |
| We're going to establish some task force expectations, So what you can expect during each one of these meetings. | 00:01:20 | |
| We're going to review and approve the meeting schedule. We do have that set up right now, but if there's an issue, please let us | 00:01:27 | |
| know. | 00:01:31 | |
| We're going to present that preliminary financial modeling and just get your initial reactions. | 00:01:35 | |
| Next slide. | 00:01:41 | |
| Oh, I'm sorry. | 00:01:42 | |
| I'm sorry, I do have a clicker so I will do it myself. | 00:01:43 | |
| Thank you. | 00:01:46 | |
| So our objective, or the objective of the must is to evaluate. | 00:01:47 | |
| All of this information together there should be a collaborative effort. | 00:01:54 | |
| As you know, Banker Tilly is going to guide you through this process. | 00:01:58 | |
| Over the coming meetings, we are going to review the financial data. We're going to evaluate the service impacts to varying levels | 00:02:02 | |
| of. | 00:02:06 | |
| The various local government entities. So the next meeting. | 00:02:11 | |
| Baker Tilly will bring information about the budgets. | 00:02:16 | |
| And the local income tax revenues that are currently received by the other taxing units, the overlapping taxing units in the | 00:02:20 | |
| county. So the townships, yes, the municipalities, the schools, the libraries, so that you can see how. | 00:02:27 | |
| Those entities are currently funding their budgets and most importantly, how much local income tax are they using to fund their | 00:02:35 | |
| budgets? That's going to be very important for you all to know as you go into this process. | 00:02:41 | |
| We're going to discuss various allocation scenarios. So tonight. | 00:02:47 | |
| We're providing A baseline and we're assuming that the tax rates will be adopted at the Max. Certainly you don't have to do that, | 00:02:51 | |
| but this is a place for you for us to start. So you can see what that. | 00:02:56 | |
| Type of revenue, what would be generated under that? | 00:03:01 | |
| Scenario. | 00:03:05 | |
| We are going to assess long term sustainability now. We know there's going to be winners and losers. | 00:03:06 | |
| In this process. | 00:03:13 | |
| Or in the structure that you all agree upon. | 00:03:14 | |
| But we're going to try to. | 00:03:17 | |
| Come to some middle ground to where there is some. | 00:03:20 | |
| Sustainability there. | 00:03:23 | |
| We're going to develop some recommendations. So you as the task force will develop some recommendations. You will put that in. | 00:03:27 | |
| Report that we will submit to the DLG. | 00:03:34 | |
| So this next slide is the project. | 00:03:39 | |
| Road map and we did initially talk about it at the last meeting, but I want to quickly go through this with you. So this outlines | 00:03:44 | |
| each of the steps we we see this being. | 00:03:49 | |
| A4 phase process. | 00:03:54 | |
| So the initial phase was to have that work session. | 00:03:57 | |
| Where we kind of educated you on the legislative changes and we will continue that education process as we go through these must | 00:04:02 | |
| meetings. | 00:04:05 | |
| Phase 2 is the official formation of the task force, which that is our first session tonight. So you are officially formed as a | 00:04:10 | |
| task force. | 00:04:14 | |
| And everyone is here and present on that task force. | 00:04:19 | |
| After we go through some of these scenarios tonight, we're going to go right into the negotiation process, which really all that | 00:04:24 | |
| means is we're going to review. | 00:04:28 | |
| And evaluate. | 00:04:33 | |
| Scenarios. | 00:04:34 | |
| And try to determine. | 00:04:36 | |
| The best approach to this taxing structure starting in 2029. | 00:04:37 | |
| And then the final phase again is developing that formal report that we will submit to the Department of Local Government Finance, | 00:04:44 | |
| who will then. | 00:04:47 | |
| Submit that to the Legislative Council and all of that needs to be done prior to December the 1st. | 00:04:51 | |
| So this is the meeting schedule that we have. | 00:05:00 | |
| Put together, we want to try to stick to this meeting schedule because we have this room. | 00:05:02 | |
| That is. | 00:05:08 | |
| Scheduled and. | 00:05:10 | |
| Right now this seems to work best for everyone. | 00:05:12 | |
| So what I would say here is that. | 00:05:16 | |
| If. | 00:05:18 | |
| There's any task force members that cannot attend one of these meetings. You can designate someone to attend in your place as long | 00:05:19 | |
| as we're not going to be voting on anything that evening and honestly. | 00:05:25 | |
| The way I see this happening is you probably won't vote on anything until the very end. You'll vote on the report. | 00:05:31 | |
| Umm, that you're going to submit to the state, but. | 00:05:38 | |
| As we get through here, if you want to vote on various aspects of the report, we can certainly do that as well. | 00:05:41 | |
| Yes. | 00:05:48 | |
| You think these are all off by a day? | 00:05:52 | |
| Oh my gosh, yes, you're right. | 00:05:56 | |
| Hmm, OK. | 00:06:01 | |
| Sorry about that. | 00:06:02 | |
| We'll get that corrected. | 00:06:03 | |
| It's it's Thursday, so. | 00:06:06 | |
| Yeah. | 00:06:08 | |
| Yes. | 00:06:09 | |
| OK. Sorry about that. | 00:06:11 | |
| I don't know how that happened. | 00:06:13 | |
| I will correct the schedule and just send you out one schedule of the actual dates of the meetings. Apologize for that. | 00:06:15 | |
| I have no idea how that occurred. | 00:06:23 | |
| OK. | 00:06:27 | |
| Next slide. So this is the. | 00:06:29 | |
| The official task force roster, so obviously we have Danny Short as a representative of the County Council. | 00:06:31 | |
| Linda Mueller as the controller of New Albany, Julia Keebler as the clerk treasurer of Georgetown and Jack Trevillian as the clerk | 00:06:39 | |
| treasurer of Greenville. | 00:06:44 | |
| All right. So some expectations and protocols. We don't want this to be super formal. This is not like a council meeting or a | 00:06:55 | |
| board meeting. | 00:06:59 | |
| Uh, we want to have. | 00:07:03 | |
| You know, respectful conversations. We want to make sure that everyone's comfortable providing input, and that includes people in | 00:07:05 | |
| the audience as well. | 00:07:09 | |
| Obviously we want to get through our agenda items, but if anyone in the audience has questions or wants to provide input. | 00:07:13 | |
| I feel like that should be something that we can handle as long as. | 00:07:20 | |
| Time is permitting. | 00:07:24 | |
| All of the participants of the task force should commit. | 00:07:26 | |
| To attendance, hopefully again, if you cannot attend, you can designate someone that that is no problem as long as we're not | 00:07:29 | |
| committing to a vote that evening. | 00:07:34 | |
| Discussions should remain professional. Obviously, we know that each entity has their own unique priorities. | 00:07:39 | |
| Completely understand that, but what we want to try to guide you to. | 00:07:46 | |
| Is to take this approach that's county wide. We're trying to get a county wide plan for this local income tax structure. So we | 00:07:50 | |
| want to make sure that yes, we focus on the municipalities, we focus on the county, but we also need to remember the townships, | 00:07:56 | |
| the fire and EMS providers, the schools. | 00:08:02 | |
| So we will continue to bring the focus back to a county wide local income tax structure. | 00:08:09 | |
| Our goal is to share all the information. | 00:08:19 | |
| Prior to the meetings, we will send out the packets of information and the agenda. We've done that the last two meetings. We will | 00:08:22 | |
| continue to do that. | 00:08:26 | |
| And we're going to make sure that our discussions and the decisions we make and the report that we generate is grounded based on | 00:08:31 | |
| financial data. | 00:08:36 | |
| So again, that's where we come in. We can run as many scenarios as you would like. | 00:08:41 | |
| I can even bring in my computer and we can run live scenarios as we're going through the discussions. | 00:08:46 | |
| So as far as some meeting protocols. | 00:08:53 | |
| We're going to follow a structured agenda. | 00:08:57 | |
| And again, we will provide that in advance and that is to keep the conversation moving in the right direction. I'm sure the fewer | 00:09:00 | |
| of these meetings. | 00:09:04 | |
| As possible is going to be best for you. We don't want to have this go on through the end of October. | 00:09:09 | |
| So we're going to have structured meetings and we're going to have goals at each meeting and we're going to build on those | 00:09:15 | |
| meetings as we go. | 00:09:19 | |
| I know the statute, and I mentioned this the last time, requires unanimous approval of this document of this local income tax | 00:09:24 | |
| structure. | 00:09:28 | |
| But. | 00:09:33 | |
| If we don't get unanimous approval from the task force members, that's OK. | 00:09:34 | |
| We're still going to document that in a report and we're still going to submit that report because I that's going to be important | 00:09:39 | |
| information for the legislature to know why you didn't reach a consensus if that's the case. | 00:09:44 | |
| We know there will be competing viewpoints. We're going to try to summarize those as we get to those and circle back on them and | 00:09:51 | |
| again, try to find some common ground. | 00:09:56 | |
| Umm, we do recommend there's some sort of documented summary of each. | 00:10:03 | |
| Meeting it might be minutes or otherwise, but that's up to you if you want to do that. I don't this is being recorded right? | 00:10:08 | |
| Can we generate? | 00:10:15 | |
| Some summary or OK, well that's good enough then, as long as somebody can go back and look if they wanted to. | 00:10:16 | |
| About the meetings. | 00:10:23 | |
| The meeting information. | 00:10:25 | |
| All right, so we're going to dive right into the preliminary financial information, but. | 00:10:27 | |
| As a starting point. | 00:10:33 | |
| Um, we want to show you where you are right now. | 00:10:34 | |
| So. | 00:10:38 | |
| Floyd County has a total local income tax rate of one point. | 00:10:41 | |
| 8-9 percent. | 00:10:46 | |
| That is comprised of multiple buckets. And I know I went through this last time, but I just want to reiterate just so you can see | 00:10:48 | |
| what the starting point is. So they're certified chairs and remember that is deposited in the general fund of each taxing unit in | 00:10:53 | |
| the county. | 00:10:58 | |
| That rate is .75%. | 00:11:03 | |
| And it generates about 22.8 million. | 00:11:05 | |
| That 22.8 million is distributed to the units based on their proportionate share of property tax levy to the total levy. | 00:11:08 | |
| So if if one unit. | 00:11:17 | |
| Has. | 00:11:19 | |
| 30% of all levees in the county, they're going to get 30% of that 22.8 million. That's how that works now. | 00:11:20 | |
| How was that different to the new structure? Very different because. | 00:11:27 | |
| The new structure will be based primarily on population. | 00:11:31 | |
| So completely different allocation method. | 00:11:35 | |
| Public safety is a .5% rate and that is distributed only to the county unit. | 00:11:39 | |
| And the municipalities? | 00:11:45 | |
| And that is also distributed based on levy, your proportionate share of levy. | 00:11:47 | |
| Economic development. | 00:11:53 | |
| Also. | 00:11:54 | |
| Only distributed to the county unit and the municipalities. | 00:11:56 | |
| The adopted rate is .3%. It generates about $9.1 million. | 00:11:59 | |
| And although the name says it's for economic development, it can actually be used for any legal purpose of of the municipality or | 00:12:05 | |
| the county. | 00:12:09 | |
| Correctional Facility is very specific. | 00:12:14 | |
| Obviously can only be used in connection with the Correctional Facility. | 00:12:17 | |
| That .2%. | 00:12:21 | |
| The 6.1 million that it generates. | 00:12:22 | |
| All goes to the county unit of government. | 00:12:25 | |
| Judicial system, same thing. That all goes to the county unit of government. | 00:12:28 | |
| .04% is the rate and it generates 1.2 million. | 00:12:33 | |
| So those are the main expenditure rates. | 00:12:37 | |
| And in total there's 54 point. | 00:12:40 | |
| 4 million that is distributed to the units. | 00:12:43 | |
| And the county unit of government. | 00:12:47 | |
| That rate is 1.79%. Now the reason why I. | 00:12:50 | |
| Segregated out the expenditure lip. | 00:12:53 | |
| Is because those are true distributions to the units. | 00:12:56 | |
| There's also another form of local income tax here in this county. It's property tax relief. | 00:12:59 | |
| That rate is 0.1%. | 00:13:06 | |
| That isn't. | 00:13:08 | |
| Distributed. | 00:13:09 | |
| As. | 00:13:10 | |
| Local income tax to the units. Instead, it's distributed as part of the property tax distribution. | 00:13:11 | |
| So you don't necessarily see it. | 00:13:18 | |
| It just flows in with your property tax distribution, so. | 00:13:20 | |
| We're kind of setting that aside when we do this analysis tonight because that's not something that the units are using. | 00:13:24 | |
| That's specifically local income tax. It's basically property tax replacement. | 00:13:31 | |
| The taxpayers get a credit on their tax bills, and this is what funds that credit. | 00:13:35 | |
| Now it's important that you know that. | 00:13:41 | |
| All of these are going to expire at the end of 2028. | 00:13:42 | |
| So what that means is when property tax relief. | 00:13:48 | |
| Lit goes away. | 00:13:52 | |
| Pretty much all of the taxing units within this county is going to see some level of increase in property tax credits, so you'll | 00:13:55 | |
| see a reduction in property tax revenue. | 00:13:59 | |
| So we kind of have to think about that as we go through our meetings and our discussion because we need to try to replace that. | 00:14:05 | |
| Lost. | 00:14:12 | |
| Property tax revenue. | 00:14:13 | |
| With this local income tax. | 00:14:14 | |
| Alright, so now. | 00:14:18 | |
| As far as the new structure, again, I know this is repetitive, but I think it's important to go through this. | 00:14:20 | |
| The new structure is what we're seeing on this screen here. So we have a county services local income tax of 1.2%. | 00:14:27 | |
| That will be under the authority of the County Council. | 00:14:36 | |
| And that distribution will go directly to the county unit of government. | 00:14:40 | |
| To be used for anything that the county desires now. | 00:14:44 | |
| The county is going to need to use that to fund what's currently funded out of public safety. | 00:14:48 | |
| Economic development. | 00:14:53 | |
| Correctional Facility. Judicial. | 00:14:55 | |
| And the general fund. | 00:14:57 | |
| So that portion is going to need to cover those items that are currently paid from the current list structure. | 00:14:59 | |
| Fire and EMS is another bucket that. | 00:15:07 | |
| Is .4% as the maximum that is only to be distributed to fire and EMS providers? | 00:15:09 | |
| So that would be the county unit. | 00:15:17 | |
| The municipal fire department. | 00:15:19 | |
| The fire territories and districts within this county and certain townships. | 00:15:21 | |
| This distribution or this allocation is going to be based on whatever the County Council decides. | 00:15:27 | |
| So the County Council is going to have a lot of flexibility in determining how this will be distributed. | 00:15:34 | |
| The County Council does have to use a combination of service area square miles. | 00:15:40 | |
| And population. | 00:15:45 | |
| But you can do it 50506040, you can weight it different ways. You'll see in this initial analysis we waited at 5050. | 00:15:46 | |
| What we could run a lot of different scenarios to see but. | 00:15:55 | |
| You're not going to really know what the best waiting is until we provide you with. | 00:15:58 | |
| What all the fire departments are currently budgeting for services and what they're currently getting as revenue. So we're going | 00:16:02 | |
| to provide that. | 00:16:07 | |
| Uh, the next time around. | 00:16:11 | |
| Non municipal units. | 00:16:15 | |
| Although the maximum rate is .2%. | 00:16:17 | |
| You can only have a maximum of .05% for each unit. | 00:16:20 | |
| Type. So like the libraries for instance, you can only adopt A rate of .05% and then that's distributed out to the libraries based | 00:16:25 | |
| on population. | 00:16:30 | |
| Township same thing .05% for all the townships distributed based on population. | 00:16:35 | |
| And that is under the authority of the County Council. In fact, all of these are County Council, unless you you are New Albany who | 00:16:42 | |
| can adopt their own. And we'll get into that in a minute. | 00:16:47 | |
| So there is a county wide municipal services rate that the county can adopt. | 00:16:52 | |
| And that would go to all municipalities that are less than 3500 and population and also. | 00:16:59 | |
| To New Albany if they choose to opt. | 00:17:06 | |
| In so, New Albany has the ability to opt in to the county wide municipal rate. | 00:17:09 | |
| Or opt out and adopt their own. | 00:17:15 | |
| Each one of those rates are a maximum. | 00:17:18 | |
| Of 1.2%. But the big difference is this, If New Albany adopts their own rate at 1.2%, they're only going to be able to tax the | 00:17:20 | |
| adjusted gross income of those living within New Albany. | 00:17:27 | |
| While the county municipal services. | 00:17:33 | |
| County wide municipal services rate will be taxed on. | 00:17:37 | |
| The whole county. | 00:17:41 | |
| And less New Albany. | 00:17:43 | |
| OS out and then we would exclude that AGI because you you can't. | 00:17:44 | |
| As a taxpayer, pay 2 municipal lit rates. | 00:17:49 | |
| They do not stack. | 00:17:53 | |
| OK, so that that kind of. | 00:17:58 | |
| Now we can get into the financial analysis. | 00:18:00 | |
| All right. So we're going to start with the easiest one to calculate and that is the county services local income tax. | 00:18:05 | |
| So in the first column is the new lit structure. | 00:18:14 | |
| So we're estimating an adjusted gross income tax of about $3 billion. | 00:18:19 | |
| We have not included any growth in this. This is based on current because we just thought it would muddy the waters if we started | 00:18:26 | |
| including growth. Yes, I think your AGI is going to grow. | 00:18:31 | |
| But we want to compare apples to apples. | 00:18:36 | |
| So 3 billion. | 00:18:38 | |
| For the adjusted gross income county wide. | 00:18:40 | |
| The county can put on a maximum rate of 1.2%. | 00:18:43 | |
| That would generate $36.4 million and that. | 00:18:47 | |
| All would go to the county, so the county share would be the $36.4 million. | 00:18:51 | |
| Currently. | 00:18:57 | |
| The county's local income tax distribution. | 00:18:58 | |
| Is. | 00:19:01 | |
| $24.4 million. | 00:19:02 | |
| And that is derived from a 1.79% expenditure local income tax rate. | 00:19:05 | |
| Which generates in total. | 00:19:12 | |
| $54.4 million, but the distributions again are based on Levy, so out of that 54.4 million. | 00:19:13 | |
| The county unit gets 24.4 million. | 00:19:22 | |
| Now, that 24.4 million right now is comprised of certified shares. | 00:19:25 | |
| Public safety. | 00:19:30 | |
| Economic development. | 00:19:32 | |
| Judicial. | 00:19:33 | |
| Lit and correctional facilities. So it's not just the certified shares. | 00:19:34 | |
| So if the county would adopt the maximum. | 00:19:39 | |
| They would get an additional $12 million. That tells me likely the county may not need to adopt the maximum, but that's we're | 00:19:43 | |
| starting at the Max and then we can run various scenarios based on the county's needs. | 00:19:49 | |
| Moving on to. | 00:19:58 | |
| Municipal services. | 00:20:00 | |
| So again. | 00:20:03 | |
| We there is only one. | 00:20:05 | |
| Oh, I guess there's two. I'm sorry, I must have misspoke. OK, so there is 2, There's two municipalities that can opt in or out. | 00:20:07 | |
| Sorry about that town of Georgetown. | 00:20:12 | |
| And the city of New Albany. | 00:20:16 | |
| Um, so those two municipalities have the option to opt into the county wide. | 00:20:18 | |
| Or opt out. So we did run both options here. | 00:20:24 | |
| But before I get to that, I just want to. | 00:20:29 | |
| Go over a few assumptions so you know what's behind this analysis. | 00:20:32 | |
| So again, and I already said this, but we are. | 00:20:37 | |
| Using. | 00:20:41 | |
| Current adjusted gross income numbers of 2026 adjusted gross income numbers, we are not inflating them at all. | 00:20:42 | |
| That's something you need to know. | 00:20:50 | |
| We are also using the maximum amount that can be adopted. | 00:20:52 | |
| For these rates, just as a starting point. | 00:20:56 | |
| We're not building in, in, in any growth and population changes in salaries and wages or economic expansion because again. | 00:21:00 | |
| We are trying to show a fixed. | 00:21:08 | |
| Baseline. | 00:21:11 | |
| We are also using the 2020 US Census Bureau population because that is what is required of us by STAT. | 00:21:14 | |
| So those are just a few of the assumptions that you should know as we go into this. | 00:21:24 | |
| All right, so here is option one. | 00:21:30 | |
| This is New Albany and Georgetown opt in. So we're saying that they both opt in to the county wide municipal rate and we have 4. | 00:21:34 | |
| Different rate assumptions shown on here. Just so you can see the various levels, I'm just going to cover them. | 00:21:44 | |
| The maximum at this point, but you can see we did .1%. | 00:21:50 | |
| .5%. | 00:21:55 | |
| 1% and 1.21.2 is the maximum. | 00:21:56 | |
| So right now. | 00:22:00 | |
| Georgetown. | 00:22:02 | |
| Currently all the way to the far right. | 00:22:03 | |
| Is receiving about 434,000 in local income tax and that does include. | 00:22:06 | |
| Certified shares, public safety and economic development. We just lumped all of those together. | 00:22:12 | |
| If. | 00:22:18 | |
| If the county, the County Council adopts the maximum 1.2%. | 00:22:19 | |
| Georgetown could get. | 00:22:24 | |
| 2.6 million as a distribution. | 00:22:26 | |
| Of municipal lit. | 00:22:29 | |
| At 1%, it's 2.153 million. | 00:22:32 | |
| .5% about 1.1 million and then .1% would be lower than what Georgetown is getting now. | 00:22:36 | |
| Umm, Greenville. | 00:22:44 | |
| Would get about 927,000 under the Max. Greenville is currently getting about 28,000. | 00:22:46 | |
| So quite a bit more. | 00:22:54 | |
| Under the Max. | 00:22:56 | |
| Umm, then the city of New Albany they're getting right now, currently in 2026, they're getting 21.9 million of all those combined, | 00:22:58 | |
| so almost 22 million. | 00:23:05 | |
| Under the Max they would get 25.7 million. | 00:23:13 | |
| With 1% it would be a little bit lower than what they're receiving now. | 00:23:16 | |
| So you can see the various levels here. | 00:23:23 | |
| The all of the municipalities would benefit at either 1% or 1.2%. | 00:23:26 | |
| Now we're going to move on to the county unit. | 00:23:33 | |
| This is. | 00:23:37 | |
| The county unit actually gets 2 distributions. | 00:23:38 | |
| They get their county services distribution. | 00:23:41 | |
| But they also get a share of the county wide municipal local income tax. | 00:23:44 | |
| So if you look at the county unit. | 00:23:51 | |
| At 1.2%. | 00:23:53 | |
| Their municipal share. | 00:23:55 | |
| Is 7.2 million. | 00:23:58 | |
| The county services is 36. | 00:24:00 | |
| Point 4 million which we covered in the previous slide, so. | 00:24:03 | |
| If you compare that to what the county is getting now, 24.4 million, that's a quite a bit of an increase it would be. | 00:24:07 | |
| Oh, go ahead. | 00:24:14 | |
| Question. | 00:24:14 | |
| What is the makeup of the municipal allocation? What makes that out? | 00:24:15 | |
| The municipal lit like how is it determined? | 00:24:21 | |
| So the municipal lip. | 00:24:27 | |
| Are they're going to go to your general fund? | 00:24:29 | |
| That's where it will go. | 00:24:31 | |
| Yes. | 00:24:33 | |
| So these like, let's look at New Albany so. | 00:24:34 | |
| If the county would adopt the 1.2% you would get 25.7 million as a city. You can you have to deposit. | 00:24:37 | |
| All of that within your general fund. | 00:24:45 | |
| And that should then cover whatever you're paying now out of public safety. | 00:24:47 | |
| Economic development. | 00:24:51 | |
| And your certified chairs in your general fund. | 00:24:53 | |
| So the municipal. | 00:24:56 | |
| So in that. | 00:24:59 | |
| Option one. | 00:25:01 | |
| Mm-hmm 20 5. | 00:25:02 | |
| And then also in the seven. | 00:25:05 | |
| You would only get the 25.7 million. | 00:25:09 | |
| That that's all you would get. | 00:25:12 | |
| Yeah, it would just be the 25.7 million. | 00:25:14 | |
| Yep, now the county unit. | 00:25:17 | |
| Gets 2 shares. | 00:25:20 | |
| They'll get the 7.2 million plus the 36.4 million for a total of $43.7 million. | 00:25:21 | |
| That's if they adopt the 1.2 Max. | 00:25:30 | |
| So just. | 00:25:33 | |
| You know. | 00:25:34 | |
| Discussions and other must meetings that I've had. | 00:25:35 | |
| We've seen where the county kind of makes out way ahead if they adopt the Max. So this is where we can have some discussions | 00:25:39 | |
| depending on what level you want to go to. | 00:25:44 | |
| Do you want to try to be able to take some of that county distribution? | 00:25:50 | |
| And give it to the schools, for instance, who do not get distributions right now that's not permitted by the statute, but that is | 00:25:55 | |
| something that we can talk about if that interests you as we go down the line because. | 00:26:02 | |
| Right now the school doesn't have any. The schools do not have any opportunity of getting local income tax so. | 00:26:09 | |
| I guess. | 00:26:15 | |
| This kind of brings us to. | 00:26:16 | |
| Why we're doing this is to let the legislature know that some units. | 00:26:18 | |
| Are could potentially get way more lit than they need. | 00:26:22 | |
| While other units aren't getting enough. So how can we redistribute this? | 00:26:27 | |
| I think that should be part of our discussions as we go forward, even if the statute doesn't permit it now. | 00:26:32 | |
| That's something that we can put in the report so that the Legislature understands the dilemma. | 00:26:38 | |
| That there's an issue. | 00:26:44 | |
| Umm, now as we go through this process, we are going to look at taxpayer impacts. | 00:26:47 | |
| Because your rate right now. | 00:26:54 | |
| Is. | 00:26:56 | |
| 1.89%. | 00:26:58 | |
| Under this new. | 00:27:01 | |
| A taxpayer could potentially pay up to 2.9%. | 00:27:04 | |
| So that's a 1% increase. I don't know that the county is going to want. | 00:27:09 | |
| All of you. When I say the county, I mean. | 00:27:13 | |
| Everyone combined. I don't know that you want to go up to that Max, that is. | 00:27:15 | |
| Remains to be seen, but. | 00:27:19 | |
| We have to determine OK if you do want to go up to the Max or you want to increase it in some manner. | 00:27:21 | |
| How is that going to impact the taxpayer? | 00:27:26 | |
| So at least just for the municipal lid, I. | 00:27:29 | |
| Did put on the bottom line what the? | 00:27:32 | |
| What the rate is now remember 1.79% is the expenditure let that doesn't include PTRC. | 00:27:35 | |
| And then what would it look like? | 00:27:42 | |
| Just the municipal rate, this is not county, this is not all the let's combine. We're just looking at municipal rate right now. | 00:27:45 | |
| What would that look like for the taxpayer? Well. | 00:27:49 | |
| At the Max that would be 2.4%. | 00:27:53 | |
| You know, or you can go 2%, one percent, 1.3. There's going to be so many scenarios that we're going to be able to work through, | 00:27:58 | |
| but that's another aspect we need to think about. We need to think about. | 00:28:02 | |
| Can the units fund their services? | 00:28:07 | |
| Number one. | 00:28:10 | |
| #2 What is the impact on the taxpayer? | 00:28:11 | |
| When we make these changes to the let structure. | 00:28:15 | |
| So we're going to be looking at that as well. | 00:28:17 | |
| As we go through this process. | 00:28:20 | |
| Option number 2 is if. | 00:28:23 | |
| Both Georgetown and New Albany opt out. So another words. | 00:28:27 | |
| They adopt their own. | 00:28:33 | |
| Municipal rate. | 00:28:35 | |
| They're not a part of the county wide. | 00:28:36 | |
| So that just leaves Greenville. | 00:28:38 | |
| Well, what happens in that case is that actually? | 00:28:40 | |
| Causes Greenville to get a little bit more. | 00:28:43 | |
| It's not a whole lot more, but a little bit more. | 00:28:46 | |
| But it causes the county unit to get. | 00:28:48 | |
| A lot more. | 00:28:51 | |
| Umm, just. And that's just the formula that's in the statue. | 00:28:52 | |
| So. | 00:28:57 | |
| The whole point of this is to show you if one or both municipalities opt out and do their own rate, it does. | 00:28:59 | |
| 'Cause changes in what? | 00:29:07 | |
| The remaining units get. | 00:29:09 | |
| So with. | 00:29:13 | |
| With both of those opting out in the scenario, Greenville would get 1.2 again. They're currently getting 28,000. | 00:29:14 | |
| The Floyd County unit in total would get 58.2 million. They currently receive 24.4 million, so quite a bit of a difference there. | 00:29:22 | |
| But that. | 00:29:32 | |
| Kind of tells us that you probably aren't going to need to go to the maximum rates in this county. | 00:29:33 | |
| Which is probably a good thing, but again. | 00:29:38 | |
| We're we're far away from really developing that structure as of now. This is just kind of to. | 00:29:42 | |
| Get you started. | 00:29:48 | |
| So. | 00:29:51 | |
| If New Albany. | 00:29:52 | |
| Opts out of the county wide rate and they adopt their own rate. This is what it would generate in that first column. | 00:29:54 | |
| We have estimated. | 00:30:02 | |
| That the adjusted gross income within the city of New Albany is about $933 million. | 00:30:03 | |
| If. | 00:30:13 | |
| The city adopts the maximum of 1.2 million. That would generate approximately $11.2 million. | 00:30:13 | |
| So. | 00:30:23 | |
| The Cur. | 00:30:26 | |
| So $11.2 million, that's what it would generate just for the city of New Albany. | 00:30:28 | |
| Currently, the city of New Albany's distribution is 21.9 million. | 00:30:32 | |
| The total shares that are. | 00:30:38 | |
| Generated as 47.1 million, but New Albany only gets a portion of that because, again, it's based on levy allocation. | 00:30:41 | |
| So you can see that if the city. | 00:30:49 | |
| Opts out there, they would get considerably less, about $10.76 million less. | 00:30:51 | |
| This is not unusual to see the situation and that and in fact that's why the legislation was changed because what we found. | 00:30:58 | |
| Through through many of the counties in the state, there were some larger municipalities that if they adopted their own rate, that | 00:31:07 | |
| just wasn't going to be enough. | 00:31:11 | |
| That's a smaller tax base than if we do a county wide municipal rate. | 00:31:15 | |
| If we look at Georgetown. | 00:31:22 | |
| With Georgetown, we're estimating an adjusted gross income of about $188.6 million. | 00:31:26 | |
| At the maximum rate of 1.2%, that would generate about 2.3 million or 2.262. | 00:31:34 | |
| A million. | 00:31:42 | |
| And that would all go to Georgetown. | 00:31:43 | |
| Currently Georgetown. | 00:31:46 | |
| Is about 434,000 so Georgetown would actually come out. | 00:31:48 | |
| Ahead in this situation. | 00:31:54 | |
| And again, it goes back to distributions based on Levy. | 00:31:56 | |
| Versus population. | 00:32:02 | |
| That's why there's a big swing there. | 00:32:04 | |
| So when you think about it. | 00:32:06 | |
| New Albany is. | 00:32:08 | |
| Probably. | 00:32:10 | |
| Pretty high if you could. Well, we know it is. It's higher than Georgetown and Greenville. | 00:32:11 | |
| Umm, but then when you flip it to population. | 00:32:16 | |
| It's and look at all the population it's. | 00:32:20 | |
| The distribution isn't favoring. | 00:32:23 | |
| New Albany, but it is favoring Georgetown. | 00:32:25 | |
| So that's why this is kind of fluctuating back and forth, but this should give you a good idea of what's happening here. | 00:32:28 | |
| So now we're going to look at the non municipal units. | 00:32:36 | |
| So you've got, let's see, it looks like 4 categories of non municipal units in this county. You've got townships. You've got, | 00:32:41 | |
| let's see, about 5 different townships. | 00:32:47 | |
| Remember that. | 00:32:54 | |
| You, the council the County Council is going to be able to adopt A maximum rate of. | 00:32:55 | |
| .05. | 00:33:00 | |
| Per unit type. | 00:33:01 | |
| It is .2% in total. | 00:33:03 | |
| But by unit type it's .05%. So if you take that .05% and apply it to the county wide adjusted gross income. | 00:33:06 | |
| That should generate about 1.5 million for the townships. | 00:33:15 | |
| OK, but then. | 00:33:20 | |
| It gets divvied up among the townships based on their population. | 00:33:22 | |
| So if you look, Franklin Township 29,000, Georgetown Township 210,000. | 00:33:28 | |
| Greenville Township 143,000, Lafayette Township 155,000 and the New Albany Township, who has the largest population 981,000. | 00:33:35 | |
| And we can compare that. | 00:33:46 | |
| With what these townships are currently receiving and local income tax. | 00:33:47 | |
| And the townships actually make out. | 00:33:52 | |
| Pretty good, right? | 00:33:54 | |
| And again, this would be at the Max, so maybe you don't want to go to the Max but. | 00:33:55 | |
| All of these townships end up getting distributions that are larger than what they are receiving now. You can see the estimated | 00:34:00 | |
| change in the allocation. It's about 1.3 million in total. | 00:34:05 | |
| That would be more going to the townships and then what they're getting now. | 00:34:11 | |
| You only have one library. | 00:34:16 | |
| That this would apply to. So the .05% everything that's generated by that library, non municipal lit 1.5 million would all go to | 00:34:19 | |
| the New Albany Floyd County Public Library. | 00:34:25 | |
| That's a $355,000 increase, again at the Max. | 00:34:31 | |
| 355,000. | 00:34:35 | |
| Umm, you also have a New Albany flood control and because that. | 00:34:38 | |
| Special district has a property tax levy. They would be able to get a share of this Non municipal lit. | 00:34:43 | |
| Again .05% that would all go to the flood control. | 00:34:50 | |
| 1.5 million they currently get. | 00:34:55 | |
| About $1,000,000. So that's about a $492,000 increase. | 00:34:58 | |
| And then you have another special unit, the Floyd County Solid Waste. | 00:35:03 | |
| Would would have the allocation of the point. | 00:35:07 | |
| .05%. | 00:35:11 | |
| Yes. | 00:35:13 | |
| Dissolved in districts in February, so no longer loving taxes. | 00:35:16 | |
| OK, we will make that correction then. | 00:35:21 | |
| Because if they don't levy attacks, they're not. | 00:35:23 | |
| They cannot be get this. | 00:35:26 | |
| Oh, OK. | 00:35:28 | |
| OK. | 00:35:32 | |
| No, that's OK. That's probably not have a small Parks Department. | 00:35:33 | |
| Small wedding. | 00:35:37 | |
| I was thinking we had a special special park district that would be fall under the cities levees. | 00:35:39 | |
| If it's a City Park district, it would fall under the city levels. It's a. | 00:35:47 | |
| Yes, but. | 00:35:53 | |
| The way you have to. | 00:35:54 | |
| A special unit is defined as a standalone legal entity in the park District is under the city. Yeah, yeah. | 00:35:56 | |
| OK. | 00:36:08 | |
| So now the fire EMS. This is probably one that is going to require the most. | 00:36:09 | |
| Time. | 00:36:15 | |
| And attention. | 00:36:16 | |
| To determine because there's a lot of moving parts. | 00:36:18 | |
| So with fire and EMS, the maximum rate that can be adopted is .4%. | 00:36:23 | |
| But the way that it's allocated to these providers? | 00:36:28 | |
| Is something that the County Council will need to determine and actually the task force will determine that during this process. | 00:36:32 | |
| We will put that in the report. So I know the County Council will ultimately adopt it, but this should be a part of the report. | 00:36:38 | |
| How you all decide is the best way to distribute this. | 00:36:44 | |
| So just to let you know, here's how we went about the baseline. | 00:36:50 | |
| So this has to go to fire and EMS providers. | 00:36:55 | |
| So what we first did is we looked at the budgets, the combined budgets of all the fire providers. | 00:36:59 | |
| And EMS providers. | 00:37:05 | |
| And I want to make sure before I go on, are these are all still the current EMS providers I have American Medical Response, no. | 00:37:08 | |
| Are we already? | 00:37:17 | |
| So current, yes. | 00:37:18 | |
| Future No. | 00:37:21 | |
| OK. | 00:37:22 | |
| What Highlander Fire Protection districts? | 00:37:24 | |
| Won't really be providing EMS as standalones anymore there OK EMS taking place. | 00:37:27 | |
| So the contracts that we hold with America and Highlander expired at the end of this year. They won't. The commissioners have | 00:37:34 | |
| expressed that they will not be renewing it because we are building. | 00:37:38 | |
| A county wide EMS OK and I believe it is a firebase EMS. | 00:37:43 | |
| I. | 00:37:47 | |
| I have been involved in these meetings but I'm starting to go on overload with the absorption of information. So it is a Firebase | 00:37:48 | |
| EMS. | 00:37:52 | |
| And there's a lot of things changing between now and next year that have to do with not just our fire districts, but also our EMS. | 00:37:56 | |
| OK. | 00:38:04 | |
| So. | 00:38:09 | |
| Yes. Future no. | 00:38:10 | |
| OK, well, that's good to know. So. | 00:38:11 | |
| Is it fair to say that there will be just one county wide EMS or is that American Medical still going to be? | 00:38:14 | |
| I don't believe is participating in the county wide EMS. | 00:38:21 | |
| Correct. So you'll have, you'll have a vendor for New Albany, OK. | 00:38:24 | |
| Gotcha. | 00:38:29 | |
| Well, that you do use my Pro. Oh gotcha. OK. | 00:38:30 | |
| So that will make it a little bit easier if it's narrowed down to just two. | 00:38:35 | |
| But let me make. | 00:38:39 | |
| Some notes, yeah. | 00:38:40 | |
| And also the Highlander Fire Protection District. | 00:38:41 | |
| Is joining the territory. | 00:38:46 | |
| Yeah, there's a lot of changes happening in the. | 00:38:47 | |
| So yes. | 00:38:49 | |
| To look at that with. | 00:38:51 | |
| A full territory. | 00:38:53 | |
| For the whole town, yeah. | 00:38:55 | |
| Still be out of that so you'll you'll have 21 fire county wide EMS and the New Albany city as a standalone for both of those. | 00:38:59 | |
| So really what we're going to have is the Floyd County Fire Protection territory we had, we have. | 00:39:05 | |
| Highlander. Oh, I'm sorry, Highlander. | 00:39:11 | |
| Kind of listed twice there, but really it's the Floyd County Fire Protection territory, the New Albany Fire Department and then | 00:39:15 | |
| the county wide EMS and New Albany will be contracting with America Pro. | 00:39:21 | |
| Got it. OK. | 00:39:27 | |
| So first what we did at least in this analysis which we will update is that we looked at what is the county wide budget. | 00:39:29 | |
| For all of fire and EMS services and the county. | 00:39:39 | |
| Currently. | 00:39:42 | |
| Then we tried to determine. | 00:39:45 | |
| Of that. | 00:39:47 | |
| Combined budget? How much of that is EMS? | 00:39:48 | |
| So what we roughly calculated is 12% of that entire budget is EMS funding. Now obviously that's going to completely change. | 00:39:52 | |
| And again, this is just an illustration. So what we did is we looked at OK. | 00:40:02 | |
| .4%. | 00:40:06 | |
| Generates about. | 00:40:08 | |
| You know, over 11,000,000, almost $12 million. | 00:40:10 | |
| We we took off the top 12% of that and just allocated it to the EMS providers. | 00:40:13 | |
| Then we allocated the rest 88% to the fire. You don't have to do it this way, but this is kind of how we did it. We can talk | 00:40:21 | |
| about. | 00:40:24 | |
| Better ways to do it or what you think might be best, but again, this was just a starting point. | 00:40:28 | |
| Then we took those buckets like the 10.69 million that we allocated just a fire. | 00:40:34 | |
| We then used Service area population. | 00:40:40 | |
| And service area square. | 00:40:45 | |
| Square miles. | 00:40:47 | |
| And we? | 00:40:49 | |
| Awaited those 5050. | 00:40:51 | |
| Again, just a starting point, but. | 00:40:54 | |
| I guess the point of all this is that you can see that these scenarios can change. | 00:40:56 | |
| Drastically depending on how you weight those and how much you want to allocate EMS. Now we could just throw EMS. | 00:41:01 | |
| Into the bucket with fire. | 00:41:07 | |
| And just allocate it a straight 5050 or 6040 however you want to do it. | 00:41:10 | |
| Right now. | 00:41:16 | |
| You know these at least the. | 00:41:18 | |
| Fire territory. The Districts. | 00:41:20 | |
| The districts, I should say the FIRE districts as they are now not combined do get shares of local income tax. So the next time I | 00:41:23 | |
| come to the meeting, we're going to show you a comparison of. | 00:41:28 | |
| What they receive now. | 00:41:33 | |
| And then we'll work through some scenarios of what they might receive under this. | 00:41:35 | |
| Structure to see if it's enough to cover their needs. | 00:41:39 | |
| So this one is probably going to be the most complex to work through is the fire and EMS. It's not as straightforward. | 00:41:44 | |
| And there are a lot. | 00:41:52 | |
| Of decisions that. | 00:41:53 | |
| The council will need to make but. | 00:41:54 | |
| I say Council, under this must process, you all will need to make that, but we, we can help you and guide you through that | 00:41:57 | |
| process. | 00:42:00 | |
| I have a question. | 00:42:04 | |
| Mm-hmm. | 00:42:06 | |
| How does How do you later on? | 00:42:08 | |
| The property tax. | 00:42:11 | |
| So that you are adding. | 00:42:13 | |
| Uh, the lead and the property tax together to get to a total budget and I don't see anything in here. | 00:42:16 | |
| That sort of layers look to together. | 00:42:23 | |
| So. | 00:42:25 | |
| As far as LIT is concerned, we can show you what the potential losses of property tax are from Sea One. | 00:42:27 | |
| And then from that we can determine what rate do you want to set these local income taxes at to cover those potential losses? | 00:42:35 | |
| If you're going to try to use local income tax as a property tax replacement. | 00:42:42 | |
| We're we can provide that information to you. | 00:42:47 | |
| What are other counties doing that? | 00:42:50 | |
| I have some moscavities that do want to do that. Others are saying we don't want this to be used as a form of property tax | 00:42:53 | |
| replacement. So it's really up to what you want to do. I can next time bring you. | 00:42:58 | |
| What we estimate is the loss due to Sea One. | 00:43:04 | |
| And filling in that loss now I will say. | 00:43:08 | |
| We have. | 00:43:11 | |
| Then running parcel level analysis. | 00:43:12 | |
| And what's interesting is, yes, the property tax credits do go up. | 00:43:15 | |
| And 2728. | 00:43:20 | |
| When we get to 29, there's as a. | 00:43:23 | |
| Significant bump because your PTRC is going to go away, but then guess what happens? It starts coming back down. | 00:43:26 | |
| The property tax credits actually start coming back down after 2029. | 00:43:32 | |
| Why is that? Because. | 00:43:37 | |
| That of the changes and not assess value, and the growth and not assess value. | 00:43:39 | |
| What we're finding is. | 00:43:43 | |
| There's not a whole lot of property tax relief provided from this bill. | 00:43:44 | |
| Surprise, surprise. | 00:43:50 | |
| So yes, we we could provide that information. It is important. I agree. It's important. It's important. | 00:43:54 | |
| Relevant. It is relevant. | 00:43:59 | |
| It is relevant. | 00:44:02 | |
| That'll show the impacts to. | 00:44:04 | |
| Oh, absolutely. | 00:44:06 | |
| Absolutely. | 00:44:08 | |
| Yup. | 00:44:09 | |
| Yes, we can show that I'm sure we want property tax relief. Or do we just want to understand what the. | 00:44:11 | |
| So you add your lead, your property tax together, you know your total budget. Make sure that. | 00:44:19 | |
| Got the money that you need, right? The sustainability. | 00:44:24 | |
| To cover whatever budget you have. | 00:44:28 | |
| That's the my simple mind. Mm-hmm. | 00:44:33 | |
| Some some committees are looking at that and def. I mean. | 00:44:41 | |
| I'm at the whim of what? | 00:44:45 | |
| What you would like to see? So yes, I do agree that's important and we can bring that the next time we we come. | 00:44:47 | |
| But you want to see what the losses are. | 00:44:55 | |
| Yeah. And I, I don't think the losses are as significant as we had originally. | 00:44:58 | |
| Thought but. | 00:45:02 | |
| There are additional losses. | 00:45:04 | |
| That, umm. | 00:45:07 | |
| So moving on to the next slide. | 00:45:09 | |
| So we this is a. | 00:45:15 | |
| Overall summary. | 00:45:17 | |
| Of what I just talked about. | 00:45:19 | |
| OK, but I thought it was. | 00:45:21 | |
| Kind of an easy way to look at this. I think it goes on. Yeah, 2 pages. | 00:45:23 | |
| But what you're seeing here is in the first column. Here's what all these units currently receive. | 00:45:28 | |
| And local income tax. | 00:45:35 | |
| That's current so you can see. | 00:45:38 | |
| Comparison. | 00:45:40 | |
| The next column is the estimated local income tax at the Max. So something I want to bring your attention to right now is that the | 00:45:42 | |
| first column is 1.79%. | 00:45:47 | |
| That's all your local income taxes except for the PTRC. We set that aside for now, but if you want to know what the PTRC rate is. | 00:45:53 | |
| Included with this, it's about 1.89%. | 00:46:00 | |
| OK, so these are the expenditure lids 1.79%. | 00:46:03 | |
| At the Max, not any single taxpayer can pay more than 2.9%. | 00:46:08 | |
| But there could be some taxpayers that pay something different depending on where they live. | 00:46:14 | |
| So, for instance, if Georgetown goes out on their own and adopts their own lit. | 00:46:20 | |
| And let's say they don't adopt the Max, they adopt .9%. | 00:46:25 | |
| But. | 00:46:29 | |
| The county. | 00:46:30 | |
| Does the county wide municipal. | 00:46:32 | |
| At 1.2%. | 00:46:34 | |
| If I live in Georgetown, I'm going to pay lower. | 00:46:36 | |
| Total local income tax rate in that example than I would if I live. | 00:46:39 | |
| Somewhere else. | 00:46:43 | |
| In the county. | 00:46:45 | |
| That is completely different than what we know today, because today. | 00:46:46 | |
| Every person that lives in this county pays the exact same local income tax rate. | 00:46:50 | |
| We could have a situation where. | 00:46:55 | |
| A taxpayer might pay a different rate. | 00:46:58 | |
| Now, if you all strongly feel that everyone should pay the exact same rate, we'll try to structure it that way. | 00:47:01 | |
| But I want you to know that it is possible. | 00:47:07 | |
| That you could have people paying different rates. | 00:47:10 | |
| We also. | 00:47:15 | |
| On the. | 00:47:17 | |
| 4th column over the second to. | 00:47:18 | |
| Second column from the end. | 00:47:21 | |
| Of the right hand side. | 00:47:23 | |
| We tried to tell you what would be a neutral break even rate. Now, not everybody is breaking even here. | 00:47:26 | |
| But this was as close as we could get, so if you wanted. | 00:47:34 | |
| Everyone. | 00:47:37 | |
| To get about what they're receiving now again, we couldn't make it perfect because we can't. | 00:47:38 | |
| Give different rates to each taxing unit. We could only do it by grouping. | 00:47:44 | |
| We are looking at a rate of about 2.23%. | 00:47:49 | |
| And that doesn't. | 00:47:53 | |
| Include. | 00:47:54 | |
| Trying to make up for losses on. | 00:47:55 | |
| The sea. | 00:47:59 | |
| Stuff. | 00:48:00 | |
| So. | 00:48:02 | |
| Again. | 00:48:03 | |
| As close as we could get, 2.23% would be sort of breaking even, but again, not everybody is going to break even. | 00:48:05 | |
| I think. | 00:48:13 | |
| You know the townships make out. | 00:48:13 | |
| Pretty well, I think. | 00:48:15 | |
| And some of the other units. | 00:48:18 | |
| But I don't want to lose sight, and I've said this a couple times of. | 00:48:20 | |
| The units that don't get local income. | 00:48:25 | |
| Primarily the school. | 00:48:27 | |
| So the other Musk. | 00:48:29 | |
| Committee that I'm working with right now, they are all feel very strongly that the school needs to get a distribution somehow, | 00:48:31 | |
| some way, whether that's an interlocal agreement. | 00:48:36 | |
| Or building in some sort of ability to have a rate for the schools right now that's not in the statute. | 00:48:41 | |
| Not to my knowledge. | 00:48:58 | |
| Yeah, local income tax is not the only source. They do get property tax, but that is getting reductions just like all of you from | 00:49:02 | |
| Sea One. | 00:49:07 | |
| But here's the hope. | 00:49:12 | |
| That when we turn in these reports. | 00:49:14 | |
| The the must committees that did include something for the schools. What that something is remains to be seen. | 00:49:17 | |
| We hope that the Legislature will take that under consideration as they go into the 2027 legislative session. | 00:49:23 | |
| We This is the first time we've. | 00:49:31 | |
| Have been able to provide input. | 00:49:33 | |
| Before legislative session. | 00:49:35 | |
| No. | 00:49:39 | |
| No, I don't know if the. | 00:49:40 | |
| If any schools. | 00:49:42 | |
| There's nothing right now. | 00:49:44 | |
| Mm-hmm. My CFO, no other. | 00:49:47 | |
| This is the only Ave. that they that they've provided us and even then. | 00:49:50 | |
| They said there's no guarantees. Obviously it's up to the up to the group. So the only, the only thing that we've heard is if you | 00:49:55 | |
| want more money, you have to referendum so. | 00:49:59 | |
| That's that's what they tell us so. | 00:50:04 | |
| We certainly don't want to do that. We don't have to. | 00:50:06 | |
| Because that's outside the taxi. | 00:50:09 | |
| So again, that's where it comes back to let's think of the county holistically. | 00:50:16 | |
| And and that's what you all should be doing. | 00:50:21 | |
| And then this last page is just a continuation of the libraries and the special units and the fire and EMS providers and again, | 00:50:25 | |
| trying to. | 00:50:29 | |
| Get as neutral as possible over to the far right. But then you can also see the comparison as we saw in the previous slides of. | 00:50:33 | |
| Here's what these units are getting now. | 00:50:38 | |
| Umm, and then what they would get going into the future? | 00:50:44 | |
| The next slide is just some assumptions we use. I already talked about that as I went through the slide. So here is the tax. | 00:50:52 | |
| Liability impact Just an illustration of what we. | 00:51:00 | |
| Have put together thus far because I just want you to get an idea of what. | 00:51:03 | |
| The taxpayers currently pay under your current local income tax structure and what it might look like. | 00:51:08 | |
| Under an alternate. | 00:51:15 | |
| Income tax structure. | 00:51:17 | |
| So in this county, from the data that we could find in the US Census Bureau, the adjusted gross income in this county is about | 00:51:19 | |
| 79,000. The average adjusted gross income. If you think that's high on the high side, we also did provide some other some other | 00:51:24 | |
| examples. | 00:51:30 | |
| So let's start with this $40,000 adjusted gross income. | 00:51:36 | |
| So this would be what you pay your taxes on. | 00:51:40 | |
| Umm, under the current structure. | 00:51:45 | |
| This person would pay $756 from a whole year but. | 00:51:47 | |
| Monthly from the paycheck it would be $63. That's current. | 00:51:52 | |
| If you went to the maximum. | 00:51:56 | |
| This person would pay an additional $400.00 a year or an additional $34 a month. So it would go from $756 to $1160. That would be | 00:51:59 | |
| the Max. | 00:52:05 | |
| But under that neutral. | 00:52:12 | |
| Um, the increase would be about $136 or monthly about $11.00 increase per month. | 00:52:14 | |
| That just gives you kind of a flavor of how this might impact someone. Now we'll look at the $79,000 one. Currently, that person | 00:52:21 | |
| pays about $1500 annually, which is about $124.00 a month. | 00:52:28 | |
| If if you would go to the maximum, that would be an increase of almost $800. | 00:52:35 | |
| Or $67 a month. | 00:52:40 | |
| Under the neutral plan. | 00:52:42 | |
| That would be an additional $269 or $22.00 for the mom. | 00:52:45 | |
| So you can see the other examples there. | 00:52:50 | |
| So we are going to be mindful as we go through this process how it impacts the taxpayer as well. | 00:52:52 | |
| And we will include that in the report. | 00:52:59 | |
| Any questions about that before I move on? | 00:53:04 | |
| So that really concludes the financial portion of it as we move forward. | 00:53:08 | |
| We really need to look at which services or operations appear to be most sensitive to the allocation changes. | 00:53:15 | |
| You know the townships. | 00:53:24 | |
| I think they kind of make out ahead, but we're, we're, I think we're going to see some sensitivity is maybe with the fire and EMS. | 00:53:27 | |
| And. | 00:53:34 | |
| Potentially with municipalities depending on whether the two opt in or out. | 00:53:35 | |
| What additional information may be needed when I come next time I am going to have? | 00:53:41 | |
| The budgets of all of the overlapping units, the revenues of the overlapping units, so you can see how they're funding things now, | 00:53:46 | |
| not detail, but just. | 00:53:50 | |
| Big picture. And then how much? | 00:53:55 | |
| Of the local income tax is funding each of the units because with townships. | 00:53:58 | |
| Most of their fire services are funded with local income tax, so you need to have an understanding of that and we will provide | 00:54:03 | |
| that. | 00:54:07 | |
| Umm, what long term concerns should we be incorporating into the future scenarios unlike Denise mentioned? | 00:54:10 | |
| We will incorporate the potential impact of Sea One with the property tax loss or the revenue decline. | 00:54:19 | |
| Property tax revenue decline due to the phase in of the credits through Sea One. | 00:54:27 | |
| And then whatever additional assumptions you want to be included, we will include those. | 00:54:33 | |
| So the next steps really is to. | 00:54:40 | |
| Kind of review the information that I provided to you. | 00:54:43 | |
| Be thinking about. | 00:54:47 | |
| Things that. | 00:54:49 | |
| Maybe you want Baker Tilly to provide other than what I mentioned so far, so maybe I should start out with that. | 00:54:50 | |
| Will the information that I said I would bring next time, will that be sufficient for us to have some conversations about? | 00:54:56 | |
| Where we want to go? | 00:55:03 | |
| What? That's OK. | 00:55:04 | |
| Any other items you think would be helpful as you? | 00:55:07 | |
| Walk through this. | 00:55:12 | |
| Could you provide something? | 00:55:19 | |
| I was gonna ask if there's anything that I know Chris Street will be here next time with my CFO, be with me next time. We've done | 00:55:23 | |
| some significant deep dives with some different. | 00:55:27 | |
| With some, with some. | 00:55:32 | |
| Financials as far as. | 00:55:33 | |
| How I see a one is affecting us. | 00:55:34 | |
| How this this the lift? | 00:55:37 | |
| Mm-hmm. Affecting us, but then also we've got a third that's going to kick in too, where we share. | 00:55:39 | |
| A lot of our operations dollars with. | 00:55:43 | |
| Some charter schools in the area as well. So those are changes we're getting. | 00:55:46 |