Floyd County Plan Commission
Live stream not working or buffering in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| Comedian Floyd County Planning Commission held on the 13th day. | 00:00:00 | |
| At 7:00 PM. | 00:00:03 | |
| At this time, we'd like to do the pledge allegiance or by standing on our flag. | 00:00:04 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. | 00:00:09 | |
| And the jury Republic for which it stands. | 00:00:14 | |
| One nation under God. | 00:00:16 | |
| Individual with leveraging access for all. | 00:00:18 | |
| All right. Thank you very much for that. At this time, we'd like to have roll call. | 00:00:22 | |
| Here. | 00:00:29 | |
| Here. | 00:00:31 | |
| Here. | 00:00:33 | |
| Mr. Brinkler. | 00:00:36 | |
| Mr. Badshaw here. | 00:00:38 | |
| Mr. Luke. | 00:00:42 | |
| Here. | 00:00:43 | |
| Mr. Owner here. | 00:00:44 | |
| All righty, this time we'd like to have somebody. | 00:00:46 | |
| Make a motion to accept the meeting. | 00:00:50 | |
| 10 minutes for March 9th. | 00:00:52 | |
| I'll make a motion to accept the minutes for March 9th. | 00:00:54 | |
| 2nd We have a second. We have a second. | 00:00:58 | |
| Any other discussion on favor signify by? | 00:01:00 | |
| Aye. All righty. Thank you very much at this time. | 00:01:03 | |
| Just like to bring to the attention everybody that we only have 6. | 00:01:06 | |
| Of our 9. | 00:01:11 | |
| Board members that can vote. | 00:01:13 | |
| So anybody would want to table an issue tonight you're that's at your. | 00:01:15 | |
| Discretion. | 00:01:20 | |
| We will allow that so. | 00:01:21 | |
| When your docket number, it's agenda item is. | 00:01:24 | |
| Called. You have the right to do that so. | 00:01:27 | |
| At this time. | 00:01:29 | |
| We have no announcements. We have no old business, new business. | 00:01:32 | |
| I'd like to have our. | 00:01:36 | |
| Attorney just go through a little bit of our procedures and she'll she'll explain that now at this time. | 00:01:38 | |
| Go ahead, Christy. | 00:01:44 | |
| And we've got this up on the screen as well. Hopefully this microphone's working a little bit better than it was earlier. | 00:01:45 | |
| So we'll start by the chairman. Mr. Unruh will read the docket. | 00:01:50 | |
| Item and. | 00:01:54 | |
| Agenda number. | 00:01:57 | |
| Then the director and staff will come up, give their staff report. The applicant will then have 10 minutes to present their | 00:01:58 | |
| application request to the board. | 00:02:03 | |
| Everything this evening is directed towards the board, not to people in the audience. | 00:02:07 | |
| Thereafter, the board members may ask the applicant questions if they have any questions for the applicant, the petitioner. | 00:02:12 | |
| After that, public comments are opened, with those in favor having 10 minutes. | 00:02:18 | |
| That's not 10 minutes per person, that's 10 minutes for everybody in the room that's in favor of that. | 00:02:23 | |
| Application. | 00:02:27 | |
| And then we shift to those that are in opposition. | 00:02:28 | |
| And that again is a combined 10 minutes for everybody in the room that is in opposition of that agenda item. | 00:02:32 | |
| We do state require that you come up and state your name and address for the record prior to giving your in favor opposition | 00:02:39 | |
| comments. Again, those comments are directed to the board, not the applicant or eBay in the audience. After that period of time, | 00:02:44 | |
| the applicant will get 5 minutes to come back up. | 00:02:49 | |
| To rebut or answer questions that are brought up during the public comments and the Board may ask additional questions of the | 00:02:55 | |
| applicant at that point in time. | 00:02:59 | |
| After that, the board will consider a ballot. | 00:03:03 | |
| And thereafter, vote on that ballot that's presented. | 00:03:06 | |
| All righty. Thank you very much. At this time, Frank, if you want to come and start with agenda item 1. | 00:03:10 | |
| What are we doing? | 00:03:17 | |
| Your typos. | 00:03:19 | |
| Thank you. | 00:03:23 | |
| Agent Item 1, Docket number FC 2/26/12. | 00:03:27 | |
| Petitioner TTCJ Properties, LLC. | 00:03:31 | |
| With representatives Chad Ernst and Todd Lanning. | 00:03:34 | |
| Location 4865 Old Vincennes Rd. Police Knobs, Indiana. | 00:03:36 | |
| Request for a development plan review approval. | 00:03:41 | |
| In the general commercial zoning district. | 00:03:44 | |
| Applicant is proposing a development plan for a drive through. | 00:03:47 | |
| Oh, sorry. | 00:03:50 | |
| Also, there were a couple of items before the Board of Zoning Appeals. | 00:03:51 | |
| That were already approved for variances. | 00:03:55 | |
| So applicant is proposing a development plan for a drive through coffee shop located on 0.45 acres in the General Commercial | 00:03:59 | |
| Zoning district along Old Bensons Rd. near the intersection with Hwy. 150. | 00:04:04 | |
| And the Highlander Point Overlay District. | 00:04:10 | |
| The parcel is located between two gas stations with a single family residential subdivision to its rear. | 00:04:12 | |
| And a commercial center across the street. | 00:04:17 | |
| A technical review committee was conducted for the development on. | 00:04:20 | |
| March 19, 2026. Providing recommendations for the development to provide a write in, write out entrance and to adjust car | 00:04:23 | |
| stacking. | 00:04:26 | |
| Additionally, the stormwater department. | 00:04:31 | |
| Director made comments about the placement for the dumpster. | 00:04:34 | |
| The applicant has requested development standards variances for this application to build a primary commercial unit under the | 00:04:37 | |
| minimum square footage and to. | 00:04:41 | |
| And to not provide the transparency requirements for the windows and doors. | 00:04:46 | |
| A conceptual site plan has or was reviewed by staff. | 00:04:51 | |
| Petitioner has. | 00:04:56 | |
| Not met all the development standards for the District. The petitioner has requested 3 development standards. Variances from the | 00:04:59 | |
| Board of Zoning Appeals for facade building material. Less than 30% transparency for front of building. | 00:05:04 | |
| Minimum size of the primary structure less than 2000 square feet. This was at 440 square feet for the proposal. | 00:05:10 | |
| And a withdrawn proposal for no sidewalk along Hwy. 150. | 00:05:16 | |
| A waiver of the development standards requirements is required if. | 00:05:21 | |
| If required to waiver the development standards is. | 00:05:28 | |
| Was granted because the waiver is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:05:31 | |
| The waiver of the transparency requirement supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring flexibility for | 00:05:35 | |
| high quality design. | 00:05:39 | |
| The waiver of the size requirement is consistent with supporting entrepreneurship as it retains the supply of small-scale | 00:05:42 | |
| commercial buildings. | 00:05:46 | |
| Uh. | 00:05:50 | |
| And a waiver is consistent with the intent of the district because the variances are modifying the design elements to fit the | 00:05:55 | |
| unique circumstances of the properties close proximity to a major intersection and a small size lot. | 00:06:00 | |
| The proposed development plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan because the site is located within the Highlander Point. | 00:06:06 | |
| Commercial corridor. | 00:06:11 | |
| And the theme Places to Work. | 00:06:13 | |
| Both economic gardening and fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship are listed as objectives and policies. Small commercial | 00:06:14 | |
| buildings cater. | 00:06:18 | |
| To smaller entrepreneurial efforts and increase the limited stock of small spaces available to the community. | 00:06:22 | |
| The proposed development plan is consistent with the intent of the district as set forth in the Floyd County Zoning Ordinance | 00:06:28 | |
| because as part of the Highlander Point Overlay District. | 00:06:32 | |
| The site sits in an intended premier commercial and office location. | 00:06:35 | |
| The proposed development plan does satisfy the following. | 00:06:40 | |
| Development plan requirements. | 00:06:43 | |
| Signage is designed to create a unified and consistent sign package. Design and location of St. access points minimize congestion. | 00:06:45 | |
| And a development or and the development was updated to include a write in write out only access to open sense. | 00:06:54 | |
| Entrances, streets and internal traffic facilities are compatible with existing and planned streets and adjacent developments. | 00:07:01 | |
| Design and layout of the development has a clear circulation pattern that is sensitive to topography and other natural features. | 00:07:06 | |
| Lighting is designed to create a unified and consistent lighting package for the development. Lighting and parking areas do not | 00:07:11 | |
| exceed 20 feet in height. | 00:07:14 | |
| The proposed development is not in a residential urban zoning district. | 00:07:18 | |
| The proposal is not in a multifamily development. | 00:07:21 | |
| The proposed development is located in the Highlander Point District or the Edwards Hill Gateway District. | 00:07:24 | |
| If the proposed development is located in the. | 00:07:31 | |
| Highlands Point Gateway District or the Edwardsville Gateway District. The following requirements have been met. | 00:07:33 | |
| Building facades that face any. | 00:07:38 | |
| Adjacent St. have a finished facade. | 00:07:40 | |
| Trash collection bins are not placed on or along the facades that face any adjacent St. | 00:07:42 | |
| A technical review committee was hosted on February 19th where concerns were raised over car stacking for the drive through and | 00:07:48 | |
| people turning left into. | 00:07:53 | |
| The site from Old Vinson's Road. | 00:07:57 | |
| The county engineer recommended it write in write out access to Old Vinson's Road and signage stating do not block intersection. | 00:07:59 | |
| Applicant has submitted an updated development plan showing the write in write out access. | 00:08:04 | |
| The stormwater director also requested that the parking and dumpster at the rear of the site be flipped so that the dumpster was. | 00:08:09 | |
| Further from the stormwater channel in the West and the detention basin for the Highlands. | 00:08:14 | |
| This has also been met with the updated. | 00:08:18 | |
| The drainage from the JC gas station to the West funnels through the channels near the dumpster. | 00:08:22 | |
| Actually, that has been changed in just a moment. | 00:08:27 | |
| OK, where the current placement? | 00:08:34 | |
| So one of these is. | 00:08:39 | |
| Recommendations has been met, but where the current placement of the dumpster presents high likelihood of waste and litter | 00:08:40 | |
| entering the stormwater system and either polluting. | 00:08:44 | |
| The ecosystem are blocking the drainage flow where variances were heard by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Staff recommends the | 00:08:48 | |
| following conditions. | 00:08:51 | |
| Provide an updated development plan with placement of the dumpster. | 00:08:54 | |
| On the eastern side of the lot, parking may be placed at an angle according to Section 520, Item E that that part has been | 00:08:57 | |
| submitted. | 00:09:00 | |
| Earlier today. | 00:09:04 | |
| Approval of the variance from the minimum size under. | 00:09:05 | |
| FC 03/26/13 and approval of the. | 00:09:09 | |
| For the building facade under FC 03/26/15. | 00:09:12 | |
| And then provide an updated development plan meeting the standards of section. | 00:09:16 | |
| That has also been met for the sidewalks. | 00:09:21 | |
| That's it for now. | 00:09:25 | |
| All righty. Anybody have any questions for Frank at this time? | 00:09:26 | |
| I do not. No. None. OK. Thank you, Frank. | 00:09:30 | |
| At this time would would the applicant like to come forward? | 00:09:35 | |
| And just for the record, this is agenda item. | 00:09:43 | |
| Docket FC-02-206-12. | 00:09:46 | |
| State your name and address for the rest. Thank you, commissioners. | 00:09:50 | |
| My name is Todd Lanning. | 00:09:53 | |
| I'm with a milestone design group. | 00:09:55 | |
| 108 Damentry Lane. | 00:09:58 | |
| Louisville. | 00:10:01 | |
| 40223. | 00:10:02 | |
| And I represent Bigby Coffee. | 00:10:04 | |
| As well as Chat Ernst, who's with Bigby Coffee as well. | 00:10:07 | |
| I don't have much to add to what Franklin's actually. | 00:10:12 | |
| Mentioned about the project like you incorporate everything that needs to be said. | 00:10:16 | |
| But if you have any questions. | 00:10:20 | |
| For us, we could. | 00:10:23 | |
| Answer those. | 00:10:24 | |
| Any questions? How many square feet is your building? | 00:10:25 | |
| I believe it is 440. | 00:10:29 | |
| Something is it 440 OK. | 00:10:33 | |
| OK. And. | 00:10:36 | |
| Go ahead. | 00:10:39 | |
| Question. How many square feet? | 00:10:39 | |
| And the. | 00:10:43 | |
| Well, that building come in. | 00:10:44 | |
| Prefabricator we it will be becoming prefabricated. | 00:10:47 | |
| OK, OK. All right. | 00:10:51 | |
| I think we need to address the landscape plan. I was doing some math and stuff and the. | 00:10:54 | |
| Trees are too large for the area. | 00:10:58 | |
| OK. | 00:11:00 | |
| Already you have a recommendation for that? No, at some point we just need to talk about it because these are Elm trees are | 00:11:01 | |
| getting 70 feet wide. We're putting them close to the road. | 00:11:05 | |
| There, there's a lot of. | 00:11:09 | |
| Probably better options out there that aren't going to cause as much damage. | 00:11:11 | |
| Condition, that's what yes, I was gonna say we'll just put we'll. | 00:11:16 | |
| Again, I just, I'm doing some quick math today and I think there are some better options that we can probably look at. We'll just. | 00:11:19 | |
| We'll just probably make that to be staff approval. | 00:11:25 | |
| Probably make sense there. | 00:11:28 | |
| Yeah. | 00:11:30 | |
| Yeah, that's usually pretty painless. OK. OK, so I guess maybe I can get in contact with you and, you know, yeah, we can chat. OK. | 00:11:31 | |
| Sounds good. Yeah, so and I have looked at the plan and kind of I think I had too many trees in the back. | 00:11:38 | |
| Maybe one too many and I could probably. | 00:11:43 | |
| Make them smaller. Make smaller trees and. | 00:11:45 | |
| We can get that. | 00:11:48 | |
| Better, yeah. | 00:11:49 | |
| OK. Any other questions? | 00:11:49 | |
| Alright, thanks guys. We'll let you come back up after any comments. Alright, thank you. | 00:11:52 | |
| At this time. | 00:11:57 | |
| We like to open up for anybody like to speak in favor of this. | 00:11:59 | |
| Project. | 00:12:03 | |
| Come forward, please state your name. | 00:12:03 | |
| Address for the record. | 00:12:06 | |
| Looks like nobody's coming forward at this time. Anybody by in opposition? | 00:12:10 | |
| Please come forward. | 00:12:14 | |
| 10 minutes. | 00:12:15 | |
| Alrighty, that closes both of those, obviously. | 00:12:17 | |
| There's no comments. You still have the right to come back up the. | 00:12:21 | |
| Waive that right to come back up. | 00:12:25 | |
| No comments. | 00:12:27 | |
| Let it be known they wave that. | 00:12:28 | |
| That portion of the of the meeting. | 00:12:29 | |
| At this time I'm looking for a ballot. | 00:12:32 | |
| I have a ballot. | 00:12:35 | |
| The name of the development is Bigby Coffee Dockets. | 00:12:41 | |
| FC 02/26/12. | 00:12:46 | |
| The owner is TTC. | 00:12:50 | |
| J Properties. | 00:12:53 | |
| LLC. | 00:12:55 | |
| We reviewed that. | 00:12:58 | |
| On 3/19/26. | 00:13:00 | |
| The findings are that. | 00:13:02 | |
| Petitioner has not met all the developmental standards for the district. | 00:13:04 | |
| A waiver of the development standard is required. | 00:13:09 | |
| If required, a waiver of the development standard is granted because a waiver is consistent with the spirit and the intent of the | 00:13:13 | |
| Comprehensive Plan. | 00:13:17 | |
| The waiver of the transparency requirements supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring the flexibility | 00:13:23 | |
| for high quality design. | 00:13:27 | |
| The waiver of the size of the requirement is consistent with supporting the entrepreneurship. | 00:13:32 | |
| As it retains its supply of small-scale commercial buildings. | 00:13:37 | |
| The comprehensive plan encourages working with other infrastructure providers. | 00:13:41 | |
| Such as in dot and Floyd County to provide safe pedestrian crossing. | 00:13:46 | |
| Which would be necessary for that location. | 00:13:50 | |
| A waiver is consistent with the intent of the district because the variances are modifying the Dist. | 00:13:53 | |
| The design elements to fit the unique circumstances of the pro. | 00:13:59 | |
| Properties close proximity to the intersection. | 00:14:04 | |
| Old Vincennes Rd. | 00:14:07 | |
| Delphi Rd. Highlander Point Drive and US150. | 00:14:09 | |
| The proposed development. | 00:14:13 | |
| Is consistent with the comprehensive plan because the site is located within the Highlander Point commercial corridor. | 00:14:15 | |
| IE at places. | 00:14:23 | |
| It places to Foster and facilitate. | 00:14:24 | |
| Entrepreneurial opportunities in the objectives and policies. | 00:14:27 | |
| Small commercial buildings cater to small entrepreneurial efforts. | 00:14:31 | |
| And increases the limited stock of small space available in the community. | 00:14:36 | |
| #4. | 00:14:41 | |
| The proposed development plan is consistent with the intent of the district. | 00:14:42 | |
| Is set forth in the Floyd County zoning ordinance because as a part of the Highlander point. | 00:14:47 | |
| Overlay district the site. | 00:14:53 | |
| Sits in an intended premier commercial and office location. | 00:14:55 | |
| #5 The proposed development plan does satisfy. | 00:15:00 | |
| The following development requirements. | 00:15:05 | |
| It does satisfy the signage designed to create unified consistent sign package. | 00:15:09 | |
| It does. | 00:15:15 | |
| Does approve the design and location of the street access points to minimize congestion? | 00:15:17 | |
| The entrances, streets and internal traffic facilities are compatible with existing planned streets and adjacent developments. | 00:15:25 | |
| And the design and layout of the development has a clear circulation pattern. | 00:15:32 | |
| That is sensitive to the topography and other natural features. | 00:15:37 | |
| Skipping down. | 00:15:43 | |
| Did not apply to E but F. | 00:15:45 | |
| The lighting is designed to create unified and consistent lighting package for the development. | 00:15:48 | |
| Ng lighting in parking areas does not exceed 20. | 00:15:53 | |
| Feet in height. | 00:15:57 | |
| 6 The proposed development is not in a residential urban. | 00:15:59 | |
| The proposed development is not multi family development. | 00:16:03 | |
| And if the proposed development is located in a residential urban. | 00:16:07 | |
| District of a multi family development is proposed. A development plan does satisfy the requirements for recreational space and | 00:16:11 | |
| open space. | 00:16:15 | |
| The proposed development is located in Highlander Point District. | 00:16:21 | |
| Or the Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:16:25 | |
| And if the proposed development is located in the Highlander Point Gateway District or the Edwardsville? | 00:16:28 | |
| District. The following requirements have been met. | 00:16:34 | |
| The building. | 00:16:37 | |
| That face any adjustments? | 00:16:40 | |
| The adjacent St. have. | 00:16:42 | |
| The finished. | 00:16:45 | |
| Facade. | 00:16:47 | |
| And. | 00:16:48 | |
| B&C don't apply. | 00:16:51 | |
| D Open space requirements of section 94. | 00:16:53 | |
| We've had some late. | 00:16:59 | |
| Yes, I'm B. | 00:17:00 | |
| We had some late changes on trash collection bins. | 00:17:02 | |
| So make sure they're not placed on or along the. | 00:17:06 | |
| Facade The face is any adjacent St. | 00:17:09 | |
| Thank you. | 00:17:13 | |
| So if I'm careful, review Floyd County Commission hereby approves. | 00:17:15 | |
| Petitioners development plan. | 00:17:19 | |
| Review application at the meeting held on 13th day of April. | 00:17:21 | |
| 2026 need to add that condition. | 00:17:25 | |
| What about trees? | 00:17:29 | |
| Alright, we we, we have. | 00:17:33 | |
| A ballot. | 00:17:35 | |
| Looking for a second. | 00:17:36 | |
| I will second it. | 00:17:38 | |
| All right. Any discussion? | 00:17:39 | |
| The condition of the plants is where this needs to go in at. | 00:17:42 | |
| So that they just talk to me and I'm happy to work with them on a. | 00:17:45 | |
| More efficient landscape plan, OK. | 00:17:48 | |
| Tell us how you need that written up, please. How you doing? Landscaping as approved by staff. That's what I Yeah. And the staff | 00:17:52 | |
| landscaping thing was approved by staff. | 00:17:56 | |
| Yeah, yeah, Yeah. You guys are working. Yeah, well. | 00:17:59 | |
| We're gonna give him time to add that to the ballot. | 00:18:04 | |
| We'll read the condition and then. | 00:18:07 | |
| I'll need a second on the condition. | 00:18:11 | |
| Azeroth. | 00:18:14 | |
| OK, I added on. | 00:18:22 | |
| 7. | 00:18:27 | |
| E Landscaping as approved by staff. | 00:18:28 | |
| That's my ballot. | 00:18:32 | |
| All right, so we got ballot visit. We need a second as amended. | 00:18:34 | |
| Any other discussion? | 00:18:38 | |
| All in favor. OK, OK. | 00:18:40 | |
| The staff had three recommendations. | 00:18:43 | |
| The last one talked about sections 5.5155. | 00:18:46 | |
| .52 Have all those been met? | 00:18:50 | |
| With the plans that we have, or does that need to be a? | 00:18:53 | |
| I apologize because I didn't add clarifying language in that that those are the sidewalk recommendations for the sections that. | 00:18:59 | |
| Require sidewalks that has been met. | 00:19:04 | |
| OK, it's OK. | 00:19:08 | |
| All right, so we're good with as read. | 00:19:09 | |
| And second it as read. | 00:19:12 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 00:19:15 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:19:18 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. | 00:19:20 | |
| All righty. | 00:19:22 | |
| Next is and ask the applicant. | 00:19:24 | |
| Yes, it's OK to put. | 00:19:27 | |
| Agenda item two and three together if you come forward and. | 00:19:30 | |
| State your name. | 00:19:33 | |
| And your address and tell us if you're OK. | 00:19:35 | |
| Sir Brad Benson, attorney on behalf of Spring Hill Holdings, located at 720 Rolling Creek Dr. Ste. 106 in Walton, IN. | 00:19:37 | |
| And yes, we have no objection to reading them both together. OK, thank you very much. | 00:19:45 | |
| All righty, at this time we're going to. | 00:19:49 | |
| And Frank, I want to make sure that. | 00:19:54 | |
| The. | 00:19:56 | |
| FC-03-26 this says 15. That's supposed to be 16. Is that correct? | 00:19:57 | |
| That's correct. | 00:20:03 | |
| OK. All right. So agenda item number 2 is Docket FC-03-206-16. | 00:20:05 | |
| Modification. Modification of subdivision standards. | 00:20:15 | |
| Applicant is requesting A modification for the Subdivision Control Ordinance requirement for a maximum 10% grade for public | 00:20:18 | |
| roadways. | 00:20:21 | |
| Previous approval. | 00:20:25 | |
| From 2021 has expired. The full subdivision proposal is covered. | 00:20:26 | |
| Under agenda Agenda item. | 00:20:31 | |
| #3. | 00:20:33 | |
| Applicant Spring Hill Holding, LLC. | 00:20:34 | |
| Site 78. | 00:20:37 | |
| 12 Excuse Me 2778 W Luther Rd. Floyd Knobs. | 00:20:39 | |
| Indiana 47119. | 00:20:44 | |
| It's yours. | 00:20:47 | |
| Let me read 3 OK? | 00:20:49 | |
| I'll go ahead and read agenda item number 3. | 00:20:51 | |
| Docket FC-03 Dash. | 00:20:54 | |
| 26-17. | 00:20:57 | |
| Primary approval for a major subdivision. | 00:20:59 | |
| Applicant is seeking. | 00:21:02 | |
| Primary approval for a subdivision to be known as Spring Hill. | 00:21:03 | |
| The proposal. | 00:21:06 | |
| Preliminary, not primary. Oh, I'm sorry. | 00:21:08 | |
| Let me applicant is seeking. | 00:21:11 | |
| Primary. | 00:21:14 | |
| Primary approval for a subdivision to be known as Spring Hill. | 00:21:16 | |
| The the proposal will. | 00:21:19 | |
| Consolidate 2 parcels totaling. | 00:21:20 | |
| 46 point. | 00:21:23 | |
| 317 acres into 72 lots. | 00:21:25 | |
| With three commonaries and a gross density of 1.64. | 00:21:28 | |
| Previous approval from 2021 has expired. | 00:21:32 | |
| Applicants Spring Hill Holdings LLC Site. | 00:21:35 | |
| 2778 W Luther Rd. Floyd Knobs. | 00:21:39 | |
| 47119. | 00:21:43 | |
| Now take it, Frank. | 00:21:45 | |
| Alright. | 00:21:48 | |
| Docket number FC 3/26/16. | 00:21:50 | |
| Petitioners Spring Hill Holdings, LLC, represented by Jason Copperway. | 00:21:53 | |
| President location, 2777 N Luther Rd. Floyds and Hobbs, consisting of two different parcels. | 00:21:57 | |
| Requests for a modification of subdivision control ordinance requirements for major subdivision for Spring Hill. | 00:22:05 | |
| Zoning district is residential suburban. | 00:22:11 | |
| Article 4, Section 3. Item R requires a maximum grade of 10%. | 00:22:14 | |
| For subdivision streets. | 00:22:19 | |
| Applicant is requesting a modification of the subdivision control ordinances to allow an excess of the 10% grade requirement. | 00:22:20 | |
| For subdivision streets and is proposing a 14% grade for one St. of the Spring Hill development being heard next. | 00:22:26 | |
| The modification was previously approved in 2021, allowing a 14% grade, but that approval has since expired. | 00:22:33 | |
| A hill sits on the northern portion of the property and we would need to be heavily graded to meet the 10% slope requirement. | 00:22:40 | |
| Thelma Way is proposed along this hill and would connect to seven lots #26 through 32. | 00:22:47 | |
| Sitting on that hill. | 00:22:53 | |
| The proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to serve letters from the local public services and has received a letter of | 00:22:54 | |
| intent from the Floyd County Fire Territory. | 00:22:58 | |
| For the staff review. | 00:23:03 | |
| The modification will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or general welfare. | 00:23:04 | |
| The modification will not have a significant impact to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. The Fire Territory has | 00:23:08 | |
| expressed an intent to serve. | 00:23:11 | |
| The modification will not adversely affect adjacent property. | 00:23:15 | |
| The grade of this roadway is used solely for access to these settlements. | 00:23:19 | |
| The modification is justified because of exceptional topography or other physical conditions unique to the property involved and | 00:23:22 | |
| is not to correct. | 00:23:26 | |
| Mere inconvenience or financial disadvantage? | 00:23:29 | |
| The modification is justified by the unique conditions of a large hill present on the site. | 00:23:32 | |
| And to otherwise develop this location would drastically change the shape of the terrain. | 00:23:36 | |
| For, the conditions upon which the modification request is based are unique to the property. | 00:23:41 | |
| For which the relief is sought and not applicable generally to other property. | 00:23:46 | |
| This property has a large hill present that adds to the scenery of the site. | 00:23:50 | |
| #5 The modification is consistent with the intent and purpose of this ordinance and the Comprehensive plan. | 00:23:53 | |
| The comprehensive plan encourages preserving natural and rural characteristics in the community. | 00:23:59 | |
| This modification allows the subdivision to retain a unique feature that would otherwise have to be removed for development to | 00:24:04 | |
| occur. | 00:24:07 | |
| Number six. | 00:24:11 | |
| The condition necessary. | 00:24:12 | |
| Necessitating the modification was not created by the owner or the applicant. | 00:24:13 | |
| This hills re existing. | 00:24:17 | |
| #7 The relief sought will not in any way vary the provisions of the zoning ordinance. | 00:24:19 | |
| The approval is consistent with the provisions and the zoning. | 00:24:23 | |
| For staff recommendations. | 00:24:26 | |
| Whereas the fire department has submitted an intent to serve letter, the street is to connect to seven locks rather than be used | 00:24:27 | |
| as a throughway. | 00:24:30 | |
| And this will not negatively impact the surrounding properties staff has no. | 00:24:34 | |
| Recommended conditions for approval of this. | 00:24:37 | |
| Modification. | 00:24:39 | |
| Docket FC 3/26/17. | 00:24:45 | |
| Petitioner Spring Hill Holdings, LLC, represented by Jason Copper Weight and Brad Benson. | 00:24:48 | |
| Location, 2777 N Luther Rd. Floyd's Knobs along two different parcels. | 00:24:52 | |
| Request for a major subdivision. | 00:24:58 | |
| Primary approval for a major subdivision on Spring Hill. | 00:25:00 | |
| Zoning district is residential suburban. | 00:25:04 | |
| The petitioner is seeking preliminary approval. | 00:25:09 | |
| Of a subdivision to be known as Spring Hill. | 00:25:11 | |
| The proposal will consolidate 2 parcels totaling 46.317 acres and is 71 lots with three common areas and a gross density of 1.64. | 00:25:13 | |
| Internal roadway acreage not excluded. | 00:25:22 | |
| The common areas contain a total of 3.469 acres and are primarily located near the entrance and in the back of the property over a | 00:25:25 | |
| Creek. | 00:25:28 | |
| The property is located within the northeastern portion of the residential growth area of the Georgetown Township and falling | 00:25:33 | |
| partially within the Highlander Point Overlay District. | 00:25:37 | |
| To the east, within the Lafayette Township, the land is designated as a residential and commercial growth area. | 00:25:42 | |
| This land is designated as growth areas due to their proximity to utilities, Hwy. 64 and existing amenities. | 00:25:47 | |
| Since shops, schools and other institutions. | 00:25:53 | |
| With an intent to focus development here rather than areas that the plant has designated as transitional or agricultural areas. | 00:25:56 | |
| This site is accessed through. | 00:26:03 | |
| Sorry is accessed through a connection to North Luther Road to the West and a connection to the platted subdivisions of the | 00:26:05 | |
| Highlands and villas of Floyd's Knobs. | 00:26:09 | |
| Both of which connect to Ulvenson's road. | 00:26:13 | |
| Where the Highlands has a fully signalized intersection. | 00:26:15 | |
| All Vincents connects to Hwy. 150 roughly 1000 feet from this intersection and is then a short distance from Hwy. 164. | 00:26:19 | |
| The proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to serve letters from the local public services and was included with the | 00:26:27 | |
| regional traffic study that the county did. | 00:26:30 | |
| Adjoining properties to the northwest, W South and southeast are the Prifoguel, Loftus, and Fincher's Farms, all zoned residential | 00:26:35 | |
| suburban. | 00:26:38 | |
| To the east are two platted subdivisions, zoned urban residential. | 00:26:43 | |
| The Highlands and the villas of Floyd's Knobs. | 00:26:47 | |
| To the north is wooded land, zoned residential suburban. | 00:26:49 | |
| A plat review was held on April 1st and while not required, a neighborhood meeting with staff. | 00:26:52 | |
| And the applicant present occurred March 26. | 00:26:57 | |
| For staff review, the petitioner has provided a. | 00:27:03 | |
| Sorry, the petitioner has. | 00:27:07 | |
| Provided A compliant preliminary plan for the project, including a preliminary plat. | 00:27:09 | |
| The petitioner has provided certification that all drainage and environmental requirements will be complied with and that there | 00:27:14 | |
| are no known outstanding issues concerning item. | 00:27:18 | |
| This is page 15 of the application that was submitted. | 00:27:22 | |
| Minor areas of the property exceed a 20% ground slope, are located within a floodplain, or are designated as wetlands. | 00:27:25 | |
| However, given that no homes will be built in these areas. | 00:27:31 | |
| The site will be serviced by sewers and no ground disturbing activities will occur in those areas. | 00:27:34 | |
| A geotechnical report would not be required. | 00:27:39 | |
| A letter from IDEM indicating that no permit was required from IDEM for the wetlands present. | 00:27:41 | |
| A phase one environmental study is not required. | 00:27:47 | |
| A regional traffic study was completed by the county and the traffic light installation along Old Vincennes has been installed at | 00:27:49 | |
| this time. | 00:27:52 | |
| Accepting cul-de-sac lots. | 00:27:56 | |
| Locksmith the size and frontage standards of the Floyd County zoning ordinance for the residential suburban. | 00:27:58 | |
| District and are laid out along subdivision streets compliant with. | 00:28:02 | |
| Subdivision control standards. | 00:28:06 | |
| Springhill Drive, Merrill Drive, Guy Drive and Thumbnaway are provided as subdivision streets, which connect to North Luther Road | 00:28:09 | |
| to the West and Old Benson Rd. via the Highlands Plighted Subdivision to the east. | 00:28:14 | |
| Sidewalks are provided. | 00:28:19 | |
| Drainage plans were approved in 2023 with Floyd Sorry with FC2308148 by the Stormwater director. | 00:28:21 | |
| The petitioner has provided willingness to serve letters from AT&T, Spectrum, Edwardsville Water Authority, Harrison RMC and Floyd | 00:28:28 | |
| County Fire Authority. | 00:28:32 | |
| Wastewater will be provided by New Albany Wastewater. | 00:28:36 | |
| This subdivision received primary approval in 2021. | 00:28:41 | |
| And has been altered for this submission. | 00:28:44 | |
| Lots around Common Area B have been shortened to dedicate more room for the pond. | 00:28:46 | |
| That will also serve as a detention basin. | 00:28:51 | |
| Additionally, there's a reduction from 76 single family lots to 71 single family. | 00:28:53 | |
| Lots the conditions from that original approval. | 00:28:57 | |
| Conditions for the initial submittal of the primary application. | 00:29:02 | |
| One, a maximum grade of 14% is approved for the street leading to lots 2733, approximately 400 feet, known as Thelma Lane, per FC | 00:29:06 | |
| 6/21/16. | 00:29:10 | |
| This was met with the current proposal. | 00:29:15 | |
| Item 2. | 00:29:18 | |
| Applicant to provide required agricultural buffer per subdivision control ordinance for Fintris, Pifoglo, and Church properties. | 00:29:19 | |
| A 20 foot ag buffer is being provided along these properties and was shown in the plan. | 00:29:25 | |
| Item 3 or condition 3. | 00:29:30 | |
| Applicant to present drainage plan to Floyd County Stormwater Board for review and approval prior to secondary approval. Staff | 00:29:32 | |
| recommends to. | 00:29:36 | |
| The Floyd County Stormwater Board at least a minimum 10% increase in stormwater detention from ordinance standards and would | 00:29:40 | |
| request considerations of 25% increase in detention. | 00:29:44 | |
| Also request coordination with the Highlands on detention in South corner of the development. | 00:29:48 | |
| Letter to be obtained from the Floyd County Stormwater Board regarding their actions on recommendations prior to secondary | 00:29:53 | |
| approval. | 00:29:56 | |
| The stormwater plan has already received. | 00:29:59 | |
| Approval from the stormwater director. | 00:30:01 | |
| Condition 4 applicants to meet with the County Engineer for recommendation. | 00:30:04 | |
| Regarding sizing of culvert on Fincher's access ease easement. | 00:30:07 | |
| Engineer to determine if an increase in size is required as part of overall drainage plan presented by developer. | 00:30:10 | |
| If determination is made for increase in size, applicants pay for installation of the culvert for county engineers recommendations | 00:30:17 | |
| prior to secondary approval. | 00:30:20 | |
| The applicant reports that drainage calculations so the existing culvert as adequate. | 00:30:24 | |
| Item 5. Applicant to meet with County Engineer regarding entrance location. Engineer to provide letter upon location | 00:30:30 | |
| recommendation and site improvement prior to secondary approval. | 00:30:34 | |
| This has been met and there's a letter in the docket. | 00:30:39 | |
| Item or condition 6. | 00:30:41 | |
| Applicant to identify access easement with Pinterest property and restrictions and provide language stating that. | 00:30:42 | |
| Access amusement is for Fentress property, ingress and egress, HOA and utility access. | 00:30:47 | |
| And that the access easement shall be a common area. | 00:30:52 | |
| This is not been met. The easement is not shown as an access easement. | 00:30:54 | |
| And I don't believe language is currently in the HOA covenants. | 00:30:58 | |
| Applicant to meet with the County Extension agent on allowable types of trees for installation. | 00:31:03 | |
| We have something where the applicant did meet with the county extension agent. | 00:31:09 | |
| For staff recommendations where residents should be aware of the location of the venturous access easement where modification is | 00:31:13 | |
| needed for the road grade on proposed Delmar Lane. | 00:31:17 | |
| Where alterations have been made to the plan since the stormwater approval was given. | 00:31:21 | |
| And where the comprehensive Plan encourages protecting the rural character of the community and where prior conditions are found | 00:31:24 | |
| to be satisfied or not applicable. | 00:31:28 | |
| Staff recommends the following conditions. | 00:31:31 | |
| Show location of the Fentress easement on plat before final plat approval. | 00:31:34 | |
| A maximum grade of 14% is approved for the street leading to lots 27 to 33, approximately 400 feet, known as Selma Lane, per FC | 00:31:39 | |
| 3/26/16. | 00:31:43 | |
| Drainage, stormwater and erosion control plans must be updated and submitted to the Stormwater Department for review and approval | 00:31:48 | |
| given by the. | 00:31:51 | |
| Department prior to final. | 00:31:54 | |
| By that department prior to final. | 00:31:56 | |
| Plat approval. | 00:31:57 | |
| And add to HOA covenants either a recommendation or requirement to utilize the most up-to-date. | 00:31:59 | |
| Indiana Department of Natural Resources tree species list for any tree plantings. | 00:32:03 | |
| That's all I have. | 00:32:10 | |
| All right. Excuse me. | 00:32:14 | |
| Any questions for? | 00:32:16 | |
| Frank from the board. | 00:32:17 | |
| Go ahead. I want to just clarify. | 00:32:20 | |
| The. | 00:32:24 | |
| Previous staff recommendations that you read. | 00:32:26 | |
| Correct. | 00:32:29 | |
| They most of these have already been met other than the ones. | 00:32:31 | |
| You have now recommended. Is that correct? | 00:32:35 | |
| Correct. OK. All right. | 00:32:37 | |
| Thank you. | 00:32:39 | |
| Yeah, I'm talking about what what I'm saying is, is. | 00:32:43 | |
| The ones he just read from the previous. | 00:32:45 | |
| Those have all been met. If they're not. | 00:32:48 | |
| On his. | 00:32:51 | |
| Recommendation now. | 00:32:51 | |
| Yeah. | 00:32:52 | |
| Or I did not find that they needed to be added. | 00:32:53 | |
| Right, right. | 00:32:55 | |
| Applicable. Any other questions for Frank anybody? | 00:32:57 | |
| Alright, thanks for all right, the applicant can can now. | 00:33:01 | |
| Come forward, please. | 00:33:05 | |
| And once again, state your name and address for the record for us. | 00:33:06 | |
| Thank you. | 00:33:09 | |
| Excuse me, Brad Benson, Spring Hole, Spring Hill Holdings, 720 Rolling Creek Dr. Ste. 106, Norman, IN. | 00:33:12 | |
| Stats does a great job going through everything. A couple things want to address really. | 00:33:19 | |
| Very quickly it is 71 lots. | 00:33:23 | |
| Those range from here under .3 acres all the way up to. | 00:33:25 | |
| Roughly 2.8 acres, so we've got a wide variety of lots here. | 00:33:29 | |
| The drainage and the change that we made on the pond was because when we got through it, we started looking at it and. | 00:33:34 | |
| The ponds a beautiful feature that we wanted to keep. | 00:33:39 | |
| So that's the change there that it. | 00:33:42 | |
| Is honestly, it's going to hurt. | 00:33:44 | |
| The development side as far as financial associate has nothing to do with money. It's solely for aesthetics. | 00:33:45 | |
| And it'll capture more on the stormwater side, too. | 00:33:50 | |
| So it's a, it's a double, double edged sword there for us. | 00:33:53 | |
| The staff recommendations that they discussed we've got no problems with at all. | 00:33:57 | |
| There was a number of things. | 00:34:03 | |
| Well, I guess I should back up the staff recommendations for the. | 00:34:04 | |
| Plat approval. | 00:34:07 | |
| Which reference the access easement. | 00:34:09 | |
| Agreed completely that excess season should have been included. | 00:34:11 | |
| Jason added that. | 00:34:14 | |
| To the plat and sent that to staff on Friday. I don't know if that made it to your own packet or not, but it has already been | 00:34:16 | |
| added. | 00:34:19 | |
| So we've got no condition to or no problem with that, keeping that as a condition. | 00:34:22 | |
| As far as? | 00:34:26 | |
| What was previously approved? | 00:34:27 | |
| One of the conditions was that the access easement. | 00:34:29 | |
| Be part of common area. | 00:34:32 | |
| When we met with the neighbor in Mr. Fentress, I do not believe that that should be common area solely because his worry, one of | 00:34:34 | |
| his worries is that. | 00:34:38 | |
| People will access it and be I have. | 00:34:42 | |
| Be able to get to that. | 00:34:44 | |
| That part. | 00:34:45 | |
| If it is common area. | 00:34:46 | |
| By law, it'll be owned by the HOA and then every single member in that development. | 00:34:48 | |
| Will have a right to. | 00:34:52 | |
| Get on that property. We don't want that. | 00:34:53 | |
| I agree with the condition and. | 00:34:56 | |
| It's all staff we have no problem with including in our restrictions. | 00:34:58 | |
| That the there is an access easement identifying. | 00:35:01 | |
| That they cannot hinder or limit his use of it, as explained that Mister Fincher as well. | 00:35:05 | |
| And then that one of his concerns was that there was vehicles. | 00:35:11 | |
| Trucks, semis, I think Duke vehicles would come access that to get to their electric there. | 00:35:15 | |
| So we have no problem with including that and our restrictions as well, just as a FYI to homeowners, right? | 00:35:20 | |
| So that's the the couple things and the conditions. I just want to clarify that that. | 00:35:26 | |
| We do not believe and it should not be a common area. | 00:35:30 | |
| Because of those those justifications, those reasons why so? | 00:35:33 | |
| All right. Any, any questions for Brad? | 00:35:37 | |
| Umm, no I do not. | 00:35:42 | |
| Jason, you gonna speak? | 00:35:45 | |
| Obviously, you have answered questions, OK. | 00:35:46 | |
| But I just want to be sure Frank, what he just. | 00:35:48 | |
| Mentioned. | 00:35:50 | |
| As far as even have a problem with it. | 00:35:51 | |
| Is it? | 00:35:53 | |
| On your recommendations, what he just. | 00:35:54 | |
| It is it per what he just said. | 00:35:56 | |
| I just want to make sure we've captured. | 00:35:59 | |
| That's correct. I did not include a recommendation for this to be as a common area for. | 00:36:01 | |
| Pretty much the reason he gave. | 00:36:06 | |
| OK, but you're agreeing what he said and it matches your recommendation? | 00:36:08 | |
| Yes, OK. | 00:36:11 | |
| Alright, thank you. | 00:36:12 | |
| Have a question? All right, Frank's got a question. | 00:36:14 | |
| Umm, high view circle? | 00:36:18 | |
| Is that going into another subdivision on the other side? | 00:36:21 | |
| Next into the Highlands. | 00:36:25 | |
| OK. | 00:36:26 | |
| OK, All right. I think that. | 00:36:32 | |
| I think we're OK. Listen, any other questions? | 00:36:34 | |
| I think we're under 10 minutes, right or whatever here. | 00:36:37 | |
| Yeah, I'm just curious what, what are the home prices when you start? | 00:36:40 | |
| I'm just curious. | 00:36:44 | |
| What are the home prices? | 00:36:46 | |
| I'd be lying if I gave you a number. | 00:36:48 | |
| But it's relatively speculative, but I mean, we, we anticipate this development being one of the nicer ones in the area we've | 00:36:50 | |
| given the location. | 00:36:54 | |
| The layout, the size of the lots. | 00:36:59 | |
| If I had to throw a number at it a year north of 400. | 00:37:02 | |
| I don't see it. I don't I highly, highly doubt it be underneath that and it's probably higher above that. So. | 00:37:06 | |
| ASBS to be the building. | 00:37:13 | |
| ASB and Shuler homes at this time I don't want to include that directly. Never know what happened though. Yes Sir. | 00:37:15 | |
| It sounds like a political answer. | 00:37:20 | |
| Channel 4, all right. | 00:37:25 | |
| No other questions. | 00:37:28 | |
| Alright, thanks guys. We'll give you time to come back up if anything, they said. | 00:37:29 | |
| OK. At this time, we'll open up the portion. | 00:37:33 | |
| Anybody wants to speak in favor of this project? | 00:37:35 | |
| You have 10 minutes. Please come forward. | 00:37:38 | |
| And this is in favor only please. | 00:37:43 | |
| State your name and address for the record, Sir. | 00:37:47 | |
| My name is Bill Amerson. | 00:37:50 | |
| 339 Tuscany Dr. Floyds Knobs IN 47119. | 00:37:52 | |
| I probably have more questions that I have. | 00:38:01 | |
| Positive comments. | 00:38:03 | |
| But I'm speaking for it I. | 00:38:05 | |
| What I know about ASB and Schuler they. | 00:38:08 | |
| Build quality homes. | 00:38:11 | |
| And. | 00:38:12 | |
| That's what we're looking, that's what I'm looking for. That's. | 00:38:14 | |
| Adjacent to the villas of Floyd's Knobs. | 00:38:18 | |
| Don't know all that, I'll talk to him later, get some more answers. | 00:38:23 | |
| But. | 00:38:27 | |
| Pleased with the estimated price of the homes. | 00:38:29 | |
| I figured they would be north of 400 because some of the lots are pretty large and. | 00:38:32 | |
| Figure you're not gonna. | 00:38:37 | |
| But an inexplicit house on. | 00:38:38 | |
| On a large lot. | 00:38:43 | |
| So. | 00:38:44 | |
| Trees. I've got a question about the trees. I hope that. | 00:38:47 | |
| Whatever trees are planted wouldn't be any of the Bradford pear, Calgary pear. | 00:38:51 | |
| I would hope the county has not taken any action on that or not, but we need to take action on that if. | 00:38:56 | |
| There's not. | 00:39:01 | |
| So anyway. | 00:39:02 | |
| But I support the project. | 00:39:05 | |
| Thanks, Bill. | 00:39:07 | |
| All right. | 00:39:08 | |
| Thank you, Bill. | 00:39:11 | |
| Anybody else in favor Prince? | 00:39:13 | |
| All right, at this time we'll close that portion and we'll open up anybody who wants to speak in opposition. | 00:39:17 | |
| And once again, total time would be 10 minutes. Thank you. | 00:39:22 | |
| Tim Fentress. | 00:39:30 | |
| Property owner, 2740 N Luther Rd. | 00:39:31 | |
| I am asking the board if I could have a few extra minutes. | 00:39:36 | |
| Sometimes I get slow in my talk. I get tongue tied. | 00:39:40 | |
| I'm sorry for that, but. | 00:39:44 | |
| I have some important things here that I need to cover. | 00:39:46 | |
| I'll try to be as brief as possible. Could I have a few extra minutes? | 00:39:48 | |
| Go ahead, We'll see what happens. I appreciate it so much. Thank you so much. | 00:39:52 | |
| I have spent more time on this. | 00:39:56 | |
| Property in this farm that anybody on this planet. | 00:39:58 | |
| Worked hard on it all my life. | 00:40:02 | |
| I'm wondering about the hill in the grade. I hadn't been thinking about that lately. | 00:40:04 | |
| But. | 00:40:08 | |
| We like them. Paris is out on that hill. | 00:40:10 | |
| 60 years ago. | 00:40:13 | |
| And they work. | 00:40:15 | |
| The grade of that hill I'm concerned about. I don't know how much you're going to cut it down. | 00:40:17 | |
| To get up there but. | 00:40:21 | |
| There is something that nearly needs to be looked at. | 00:40:22 | |
| Now 3 years ago we was here. | 00:40:26 | |
| County Engineer. | 00:40:29 | |
| You said that. | 00:40:31 | |
| The. | 00:40:33 | |
| That my son's on the driveway. | 00:40:35 | |
| That call has been. | 00:40:39 | |
| Ever since we put it there, it was supposed to be an upgraded for years. | 00:40:42 | |
| And it was not. | 00:40:46 | |
| And since. | 00:40:47 | |
| Last three years. | 00:40:48 | |
| How many developments have been approved? | 00:40:49 | |
| In the Hollander Point. | 00:40:52 | |
| Down through the Highlands. I will say this, you stood on top of the Highlands and put good. | 00:40:54 | |
| Controller. | 00:40:59 | |
| On that. | 00:41:00 | |
| But we're sitting here, wait, holding our breath, The only persons. | 00:41:02 | |
| Then it affects if my son. | 00:41:06 | |
| And I'm speaking for my son. | 00:41:08 | |
| My granddaughter who lives back there, they're the only ones living on the whole farm right now. | 00:41:11 | |
| We lost that driveway three times in the 80s and 90s. | 00:41:15 | |
| I called years ago. | 00:41:19 | |
| For a precast. | 00:41:22 | |
| Bridge there. | 00:41:23 | |
| To take care of the problem. | 00:41:25 | |
| With all the increase in flow. | 00:41:27 | |
| All the drainage plants from up. | 00:41:29 | |
| It's a Honda Point. | 00:41:31 | |
| Point. | 00:41:33 | |
| And empty into that spot right there through our 4 foot tile under that driveway. | 00:41:34 | |
| Now I realize the driveway belongs to the developer. | 00:41:39 | |
| But I want some guarantees there. | 00:41:43 | |
| That. | 00:41:46 | |
| This the county engineer, he's going to fill a report, right? | 00:41:47 | |
| He hasn't done it. I spoke to him Thursday. | 00:41:51 | |
| After three years, I don't know why it hasn't been done. | 00:41:54 | |
| But. | 00:41:57 | |
| My sons, both my sons own the property in the back we want to see. | 00:41:58 | |
| A bigger right there, uh, tile. | 00:42:04 | |
| Pre cash bridge would be perfect. | 00:42:06 | |
| Uh, you got them all over the county, the one. | 00:42:09 | |
| It's got my attention is that. | 00:42:11 | |
| Right there on 150 at Buck Creek Rd. | 00:42:14 | |
| I've measured it. | 00:42:16 | |
| It looks. | 00:42:18 | |
| Like it should be the right one there. | 00:42:19 | |
| Now. | 00:42:22 | |
| The driveway. | 00:42:23 | |
| I built that driveway. I paid for it. | 00:42:24 | |
| I spent a lot of money on that driveway through the years. The lower end of it there at Luther Rd. you see, is in the floods | 00:42:28 | |
| wrench. | 00:42:31 | |
| And it will get underwater in A5. | 00:42:35 | |
| And. | 00:42:39 | |
| I have a real problem also with that turning lane. | 00:42:41 | |
| That turning lane should have been taken care of years ago. It was originally set up. | 00:42:44 | |
| With a 30 foot driveway. | 00:42:48 | |
| To be an entrance. | 00:42:49 | |
| Into the development my dad did that and when he did it he also put the property line on the South side of the driveway, which has | 00:42:51 | |
| caused trouble. | 00:42:56 | |
| You just don't do things like that. | 00:43:02 | |
| Now I need to ask. | 00:43:04 | |
| About the This will be a homeowners. | 00:43:06 | |
| Association in this development, correct? | 00:43:10 | |
| I mean that it. | 00:43:13 | |
| The question is. | 00:43:15 | |
| A homeowners association will control. | 00:43:16 | |
| That now being as the property lines go across the driveway. | 00:43:20 | |
| Will that driveway itself become? | 00:43:25 | |
| Part of. | 00:43:28 | |
| The homeowners association. | 00:43:29 | |
| And will they have a say? | 00:43:31 | |
| But I think. | 00:43:33 | |
| He just answered that. | 00:43:35 | |
| That. | 00:43:36 | |
| They. | 00:43:39 | |
| Will not. | 00:43:40 | |
| The can impede what we use that driveway for. | 00:43:41 | |
| Me, my sons. | 00:43:45 | |
| The agricultural we use. | 00:43:46 | |
| All the big trucks. I have a Duke Energy. | 00:43:48 | |
| Agreement there for them to get their trucks in down on the Little Indian Creek. | 00:43:51 | |
| Big equipment. | 00:43:55 | |
| Everything else. | 00:43:56 | |
| There's that's one of my concerns right there. | 00:43:58 | |
| Now. | 00:44:00 | |
| In the first. | 00:44:01 | |
| Three years ago. | 00:44:02 | |
| Under the. | 00:44:04 | |
| It was listed as farming. | 00:44:07 | |
| Activities. | 00:44:09 | |
| My acceptance of a deed. Another transfer instrument each each lot owner. | 00:44:12 | |
| In there is advised that this development is in an agricultural residential zone. | 00:44:17 | |
| Which permits certain agricultural uses. | 00:44:22 | |
| Each lot owner by acceptance of a deed. | 00:44:24 | |
| Our other transfer instrument. | 00:44:27 | |
| Waves his or her right. | 00:44:29 | |
| To cause any problem. | 00:44:31 | |
| To me. | 00:44:33 | |
| And my son's in our agricultural operations. | 00:44:35 | |
| My son's raised a. | 00:44:38 | |
| Livestock or. | 00:44:39 | |
| Go back to raging livestock over on the other side. | 00:44:40 | |
| And. | 00:44:43 | |
| What comes into play there with that? | 00:44:44 | |
| Is the agricultural buffer. | 00:44:47 | |
| Now I. | 00:44:49 | |
| I don't ask much from Floyd County at all, but I'm asking now. | 00:44:52 | |
| I want this. | 00:44:56 | |
| They say it's not in here, but I want it. | 00:44:59 | |
| And the file. | 00:45:02 | |
| Approval. | 00:45:04 | |
| Says farming activities. | 00:45:05 | |
| This section right here. | 00:45:08 | |
| I want that. | 00:45:10 | |
| And so I don't have any problems whatsoever. | 00:45:12 | |
| Now I'm understanding. | 00:45:16 | |
| That this area on that driveway is listed as it will not be a common area. | 00:45:18 | |
| And that's what I've also wanted to ask for and they've done answered that. | 00:45:24 | |
| But. | 00:45:29 | |
| I I have two entrances into the field up there. | 00:45:32 | |
| To my field off the driveway. | 00:45:37 | |
| That's for the big equipment. | 00:45:39 | |
| And. | 00:45:41 | |
| I want to ask that. | 00:45:43 | |
| The buffer area Mr. Prop Ogles over on the north. | 00:45:46 | |
| Side and mine along. | 00:45:50 | |
| The road. | 00:45:54 | |
| I want them to be. | 00:45:55 | |
| Different than I believe what they called for. | 00:45:58 | |
| I want Cedars. | 00:46:01 | |
| Cedar's work. | 00:46:04 | |
| Cedar seedlings. | 00:46:05 | |
| I planted it myself. | 00:46:07 | |
| The man down on Duffy Rd. has just planted. | 00:46:09 | |
| I don't know how many thousand down there. | 00:46:11 | |
| And they work. | 00:46:13 | |
| I want cedar seedlings. | 00:46:15 | |
| On that buffer. | 00:46:17 | |
| It will create a wall very quickly. | 00:46:19 | |
| And alleviate any problems with drift. | 00:46:21 | |
| Fertilizer. Uh, lime. Specially lime dust. | 00:46:25 | |
| Going up that hill. | 00:46:28 | |
| This this development. | 00:46:30 | |
| Is in a situation. | 00:46:33 | |
| Like I've never seen in Floyd County. I believe that all of you will agree with that. | 00:46:35 | |
| It's the residential subdivision. | 00:46:39 | |
| Heavy, uh. | 00:46:41 | |
| Homes. Big homes. | 00:46:44 | |
| Coming right down. | 00:46:46 | |
| To the floodplain. | 00:46:48 | |
| Right down onto the driveway. | 00:46:50 | |
| And then extending across to my line. | 00:46:52 | |
| On the South side. | 00:46:55 | |
| I want it recognized that. | 00:46:57 | |
| Then it's an agricultural area. | 00:47:00 | |
| To also Mr. Loftus's and. | 00:47:02 | |
| Mr. Bishops. | 00:47:05 | |
| To the West. | 00:47:06 | |
| To be included in that. | 00:47:09 | |
| Under Farming activities. | 00:47:11 | |
| That's the way it read three years ago. | 00:47:13 | |
| And I want this to read the same way in this one. | 00:47:16 | |
| I'm told that it's not in this one. | 00:47:20 | |
| But. | 00:47:23 | |
| I wanted to read it. | 00:47:24 | |
| The same as it did three years ago in in that. | 00:47:27 | |
| Agreement there. | 00:47:31 | |
| I believe I've got everything there. | 00:47:33 | |
| I am. | 00:47:36 | |
| I need these things taken care of. | 00:47:37 | |
| I hope you read my letter. | 00:47:40 | |
| I'm sorry if I didn't write it right. | 00:47:42 | |
| It's I have a hard time writing letters. | 00:47:44 | |
| And like everybody else in public speaking. | 00:47:47 | |
| But you can see my heart in it. | 00:47:50 | |
| I've been there all my life. | 00:47:52 | |
| To see this. | 00:47:53 | |
| Who's your homestead disappear. | 00:47:54 | |
| Is extremely hard on me. | 00:47:57 | |
| I'm gonna say a personal thing here. | 00:48:00 | |
| Years ago. | 00:48:02 | |
| I asked about. | 00:48:04 | |
| People got ahead on me. | 00:48:07 | |
| I was an first. | 00:48:09 | |
| You always ask your children. | 00:48:11 | |
| First, no matter what. | 00:48:13 | |
| Unless it's a bad situation. | 00:48:14 | |
| I wasn't asked. People got ahead of me, people got upset with me because I even spoke up. | 00:48:17 | |
| I never, ever want to see that again in Floyd County. | 00:48:23 | |
| It's been tough on me here to. | 00:48:27 | |
| Stand here and speak like this. I usually don't. | 00:48:30 | |
| Do this but these things that I have mentioned. | 00:48:34 | |
| Let me look real quick here. | 00:48:39 | |
| We do want that pile taken care of. | 00:48:45 | |
| A free cash bridge would do it. | 00:48:47 | |
| My son's. | 00:48:50 | |
| Property over on the other side. | 00:48:51 | |
| It's a 20 foot. | 00:48:54 | |
| Buffer correct? | 00:48:55 | |
| 20 foot buffer. | 00:48:57 | |
| All the way the length of the farm, the width of the farm. | 00:48:59 | |
| From the church property. | 00:49:02 | |
| Download My Sons. | 00:49:04 | |
| 20 feet and all the way back. | 00:49:06 | |
| To Luther Row. | 00:49:10 | |
| I want to see that. | 00:49:11 | |
| It's important. | 00:49:13 | |
| I have friends that farm over in Illinois. | 00:49:14 | |
| And they are in the middle of things like this. | 00:49:17 | |
| Really deep. They farm 6000 acres over there and they have 3. | 00:49:20 | |
| Lawsuits. | 00:49:23 | |
| From. | 00:49:25 | |
| Homeowners association on them. | 00:49:27 | |
| I just want to make sure that that is in there. | 00:49:30 | |
| And that the homeowners association rules and laws. | 00:49:33 | |
| On that driveway. | 00:49:37 | |
| He is not detrimental to me and my sons. I I wrote that down. | 00:49:39 | |
| And we've got. | 00:49:45 | |
| That's fine, but we're out of time. You. You. | 00:49:48 | |
| You took the whole time, the 10 minutes, but I'm going to open up for somebody else to speak, OK? | 00:49:50 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Filters. | 00:49:54 | |
| I appreciate that. | 00:49:56 | |
| Thank you. | 00:49:57 | |
| All right. | 00:49:59 | |
| Anybody else like to speak in opposition? | 00:50:01 | |
| Open up the floor again for some more time. | 00:50:04 | |
| All righty, looks pretty good at this time. We asked the applicant to come back and. | 00:50:10 | |
| Try to respond to the request. | 00:50:15 | |
| Are the issues. | 00:50:18 | |
| I'm I'm. I'm going to write down what I. | 00:50:21 | |
| I'm going to read what I wrote down and see if it matches what you wrote down. | 00:50:23 | |
| He he mentioned grade. | 00:50:28 | |
| He mentioned tile under drive his sons. | 00:50:30 | |
| Uh, and ask for a bridge. A precast bridge, possibly. | 00:50:34 | |
| Driveway he built. | 00:50:38 | |
| It goes underwater. Something about a turning lane. | 00:50:39 | |
| HOA. This is under an. | 00:50:44 | |
| It's question propulsion access. | 00:50:46 | |
| Across Drive. | 00:50:50 | |
| Homeowners association question. | 00:50:52 | |
| AG buffer. | 00:50:56 | |
| Question. | 00:50:58 | |
| Second entrance for big equipment. | 00:51:00 | |
| And you'd like to have buffers. He would like to have cedar trees. | 00:51:03 | |
| And I didn't catch last with. | 00:51:06 | |
| The Loftus in some other farmer. | 00:51:08 | |
| But I missed that which that was adjacent farms, Yeah, that he was referring. OK, so that's what I wrote down. | 00:51:10 | |
| Help us out here. | 00:51:15 | |
| Yeah, on so on the hill in the grading. | 00:51:16 | |
| You know. | 00:51:19 | |
| When they graded it and. | 00:51:21 | |
| Apparently he installed terraces on the on the site which which do work, but as part of our work we're putting in curbs. | 00:51:23 | |
| Gutters. | 00:51:30 | |
| Storm sewers. | 00:51:31 | |
| Conveying that water. | 00:51:32 | |
| Subsurface to detention basins. | 00:51:33 | |
| So I think our work. | 00:51:36 | |
| And when it's finished, we'll accomplish the same thing that the terraces are accomplishing. | 00:51:38 | |
| On the tile. | 00:51:43 | |
| So every project that we do Floyd County stormwater requires us to look at all the downstream tiles. | 00:51:44 | |
| And make sure that they're adequate. | 00:51:50 | |
| In our initial review, our first review which was approved. | 00:51:52 | |
| We looked at that tile and it was adequate for the drainage that's that's going there. | 00:51:56 | |
| They're going to review the storm water again per the conditions. We'll check it again, but. | 00:52:00 | |
| I'm sure that it will be the same. | 00:52:05 | |
| But we will definitely look at it again. I don't know that the county engineer approved it separately from stormwater last time. | 00:52:08 | |
| But Stormwater did approve that as part of our calculation. | 00:52:13 | |
| The the what? What Mr. Finters talks about the turning lane. | 00:52:18 | |
| There's a little sliver of. | 00:52:22 | |
| Of property that. | 00:52:23 | |
| Goes S that was included in this piece. | 00:52:25 | |
| We're showing most of that being dedicated as right of way. | 00:52:27 | |
| There is a little 10 foot sliver that right now we're showing is a lot but. | 00:52:30 | |
| I know the developer was going to was going to look at that in the future and see. | 00:52:34 | |
| What could be done about that? | 00:52:37 | |
| There is an HOA required. | 00:52:40 | |
| That Mister Fentress has an easement that cannot block the driveway. | 00:52:42 | |
| We are also going to use that driveway we have to install a lift station for. | 00:52:46 | |
| Super service, we're going to use that driveway to access that lift station as well. | 00:52:50 | |
| But. | 00:52:54 | |
| And that's what Mr. Benson was talking about earlier. | 00:52:55 | |
| The previous approval condition was to dedicate that as common area. | 00:52:58 | |
| That creates a whole another set of issues for Mr. Fentress. | 00:53:02 | |
| So we are proposing that the lots would own. | 00:53:05 | |
| The land under the easement. | 00:53:08 | |
| But the easement stays in place. | 00:53:10 | |
| No one can take that away from Mr. Fentress unless he agrees to that. | 00:53:11 | |
| That will be planted, it's of record now. It will be planted and carried forward. | 00:53:16 | |
| I'm gonna I'm gonna skip to the ag buffer. | 00:53:23 | |
| So your AG buffer. | 00:53:25 | |
| It's a negative planting. | 00:53:26 | |
| Buffer. It requires no toxic type plants to be planted. | 00:53:29 | |
| To protect humans and livestocks from eating them. | 00:53:33 | |
| And and being killed. There is no requirement for any plantings. | 00:53:35 | |
| Under your AG buffer. | 00:53:39 | |
| Requirements. | 00:53:41 | |
| And then I think. | 00:53:43 | |
| I don't know for sure what document I'm assuming he was talking about. | 00:53:45 | |
| What I call probably the last person in the world. | 00:53:48 | |
| What I call a Roscoe Emily Claus. | 00:53:51 | |
| Which is notifying the anyone that buys a lot in there. | 00:53:53 | |
| That they're in an agricultural area and there might be. | 00:53:56 | |
| Noxious activities that happen, smells and whatever. | 00:53:59 | |
| I we haven't talked about that. | 00:54:02 | |
| It's probably not in the current covenant. It's it's not in the current covenants. And I can say if that's something that this | 00:54:05 | |
| commission's really. | 00:54:08 | |
| Gonna hang their hat on the. | 00:54:12 | |
| We have no problem. | 00:54:13 | |
| Putting that in there, well, I I don't see any problem with it myself that that way at least the the the homeowner acknowledges | 00:54:15 | |
| it. | 00:54:18 | |
| It's not going to guarantee somebody is not going to complain, but it still helps you somewhat, yeah. | 00:54:23 | |
| While we're on the restrictions, we've got no problem with including that in there about the access easement. | 00:54:28 | |
| That it cannot be affected limited and that. | 00:54:32 | |
| I don't know how exactly we'll word it yet, but there's there will be people, you know. | 00:54:37 | |
| Vehicles that will be on that vehicle on that road there, we'll make sure we include that in there. | 00:54:41 | |
| And an HOA is required by your ordinance. | 00:54:46 | |
| Right. | 00:54:48 | |
| And then as. | 00:54:50 | |
| Brad mentioned. | 00:54:52 | |
| Language can be added in there about not blocking these. | 00:54:53 | |
| OK. And and that's already as part of the D that created that easement. | 00:54:56 | |
| You can't eliminate that, so that language is already there legally. | 00:55:00 | |
| OK, he cannot give. | 00:55:04 | |
| Additional approval. | 00:55:06 | |
| For other people. | 00:55:08 | |
| Access that though. | 00:55:09 | |
| Correct. So nobody can, we cannot limit the use of that easement and he cannot expand the use of that easement without our | 00:55:10 | |
| approval. So it's. | 00:55:14 | |
| We're in the same in the same system, right? | 00:55:19 | |
| Nobody can make any changes without everybody. | 00:55:21 | |
| Yes, Sir. | 00:55:24 | |
| Now the the pipe that he's talking from the church to. | 00:55:25 | |
| North Duffy Rd. That's a long time, long way. | 00:55:28 | |
| Yeah, that's that was an well. | 00:55:32 | |
| I thought I mentioned pipe now also. No no no. The only pipe you mentioned was going underneath the. | 00:55:35 | |
| Undergoing our son's role. | 00:55:41 | |
| We'll double check it again, right? | 00:55:44 | |
| And that's where, of course, he wanted the. | 00:55:46 | |
| The bridge. | 00:55:48 | |
| Wait or yeah? | 00:55:49 | |
| OK. | 00:55:53 | |
| So I just want, I guess what I want to make sure of this is that that. | 00:55:54 | |
| That we. | 00:55:57 | |
| Address the conditions adequately. | 00:55:59 | |
| And we don't have, we don't have to redo a whole lot of stuff here. | 00:56:01 | |
| Well, I understand, I understand, but we don't necessarily want to. I understand, right? | 00:56:05 | |
| Right. Well, that's not what I'm talking about, what you just agreed to. | 00:56:11 | |
| To to change the, the as far as the language on the easement, yes, Sir, that's not a problem at all. And that I believe that was | 00:56:15 | |
| part of the staff report, staff recommendation. So. | 00:56:20 | |
| OK. | 00:56:26 | |
| Any other questions for these general? | 00:56:29 | |
| I think Mr. | 00:56:31 | |
| There was an earlier question about landscaping. | 00:56:32 | |
| The pear trees or whatever. | 00:56:36 | |
| Hello. | 00:56:38 | |
| I'll ask Miss Anderson this question. I think Brad prepares are illegal to sell in Indiana now, right? They are not illegal to | 00:56:41 | |
| sell yet, but. | 00:56:43 | |
| On all of our landscape plants, we have asked the landscapers put which trees they are not and Bradford parries on the list of. | 00:56:46 | |
| They will not plant. | 00:56:53 | |
| I have a personal amendment against Bradford Paris as well. I do too. | 00:56:54 | |
| So is there? | 00:57:03 | |
| Is there any? | 00:57:04 | |
| Landscaping buffer between this subdivision and. | 00:57:06 | |
| No, because they're both zoned the same. | 00:57:10 | |
| Right. But I believe one of the conditions was. | 00:57:13 | |
| That we follow the Indiana ID and our tree species list and. | 00:57:16 | |
| That's no problem. We can do that absolutely 100% staff and I already discussed that. We've got no problem with that as the | 00:57:20 | |
| worded. | 00:57:23 | |
| On the recommendation. | 00:57:26 | |
| OK. | 00:57:28 | |
| Anything else? | 00:57:29 | |
| Everybody cool. | 00:57:34 | |
| All right. Thanks guys. Figure out all these. | 00:57:36 | |
| All right, this time I'm looking for a ballot if anybody has one. I have a ballot for 16 and 17 but. | 00:57:40 | |
| I'll read them and then we'll go go from there, do one at a time. | 00:57:48 | |
| Yes, OK. I'm Chris Welch. | 00:57:51 | |
| Docket number FC 0326. | 00:57:55 | |
| 16. | 00:57:59 | |
| Petitioner named Spring Hills Holdings LLC. | 00:58:00 | |
| Flight ordinance authority. Floyd County Subdivision control. | 00:58:05 | |
| Ordinance Article 1. | 00:58:09 | |
| 10 the Floyd County. | 00:58:11 | |
| Planning Commission. | 00:58:13 | |
| May grant modifications. | 00:58:14 | |
| To the required. | 00:58:16 | |
| Requirements of all subdivision control ordinance. | 00:58:18 | |
| Only if all of the following criteria met. | 00:58:21 | |
| One, the modification will not be detrimental to the. | 00:58:25 | |
| Public Health. | 00:58:29 | |
| In safety or general welfare. | 00:58:31 | |
| To the modification will not adversely. | 00:58:33 | |
| Affect adjacent property. | 00:58:36 | |
| 3 The modification is justified. | 00:58:38 | |
| Justified because it's exceptional topographical. | 00:58:41 | |
| Or other physical conditions unique to the property. | 00:58:45 | |
| Involved is not correct. | 00:58:48 | |
| Near the inconvenience or financial disadvantage? | 00:58:51 | |
| For the condition upon which this modification request is based. | 00:58:56 | |
| Are unique for the property for which the relief is sought. | 00:59:01 | |
| And not applicable generally to. | 00:59:05 | |
| To other property. | 00:59:07 | |
| This property has a large hill present that adds to the scenery of the site. | 00:59:09 | |
| Five the Commission. | 00:59:15 | |
| The modification is consistent. | 00:59:17 | |
| With. | 00:59:20 | |
| Incident, intent and purpose of the ordinance in the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:59:21 | |
| The condition necessary 6. The condition necessary. | 00:59:28 | |
| The modification was created by the owner or applicant. | 00:59:32 | |
| The hill is. | 00:59:35 | |
| Pre-existing. | 00:59:37 | |
| 7 The relief sought will not in any way vary. | 00:59:39 | |
| The provision or zoning ordinance. | 00:59:43 | |
| The approval is consistent. | 00:59:46 | |
| With provisions in the zoning ordinance. | 00:59:48 | |
| After careful review, the Planning Commission. | 00:59:55 | |
| Finds that the variance. | 00:59:59 | |
| Modification will not. | 01:00:01 | |
| Be detrimental to the public health and safety of the general welfare. | 01:00:03 | |
| The modification is justified because of an exceptional. | 01:00:07 | |
| Topographical or other physical conditions unique to the property. | 01:00:11 | |
| Involved. | 01:00:16 | |
| And is not to correct mere inconveniences or financial disadvantage. | 01:00:17 | |
| Not to have a significant impact to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. | 01:00:23 | |
| The fire territory. | 01:00:29 | |
| Has expressed it. | 01:00:30 | |
| An intent to serve. | 01:00:32 | |
| To the variance. | 01:00:34 | |
| Modification will not. | 01:00:36 | |
| Adversely. | 01:00:38 | |
| Affect the adjacent property because the grade of the roadway is used solely for the access of the seven. | 01:00:39 | |
| Lots. | 01:00:46 | |
| 3 The variance modification is justified because. | 01:00:48 | |
| Of an exception. | 01:00:53 | |
| Exceptional topographical. | 01:00:54 | |
| Or other physical conditions. | 01:00:57 | |
| Unique to the property involved. | 01:01:00 | |
| And is not to correct the mere inconvenience of financial disadvantage because? | 01:01:02 | |
| The modification is unique. | 01:01:07 | |
| By the unique condition of a large hill present on the site. | 01:01:09 | |
| And otherwise developed. | 01:01:14 | |
| This location would. | 01:01:16 | |
| Would drastically change the shape of the terrain. | 01:01:17 | |
| For the condition upon. | 01:01:21 | |
| This variance modification request is based. | 01:01:24 | |
| Are unique to the property. | 01:01:27 | |
| For which the relief. | 01:01:31 | |
| Is sought in his. | 01:01:33 | |
| Not applicable generally. | 01:01:35 | |
| Two other properties because the property has a large hill present that adds to the scenery of the site. | 01:01:38 | |
| The variance modification is consistent. | 01:01:45 | |
| With the intent and purpose of the ordinance. | 01:01:49 | |
| Of the comprehensive plan. | 01:01:52 | |
| Because the comprehensive plan covered. | 01:01:54 | |
| Preserving natural and rural characteristics in the community. | 01:01:56 | |
| This modification allows a subdivision to retain a unique feature. | 01:02:01 | |
| That would otherwise. | 01:02:05 | |
| Have to be removed for development to occur. | 01:02:07 | |
| 6 The condition necessary. | 01:02:11 | |
| Are the conditions necessitating the variance modification was not created by the owner? | 01:02:15 | |
| Or the applet because the hill was. | 01:02:22 | |
| Hill is pre-existing. | 01:02:24 | |
| 7. | 01:02:26 | |
| The relief sought will not in any way vary. | 01:02:28 | |
| The provisions of the zoning ordinance because of the approval. | 01:02:32 | |
| Is is consistent? | 01:02:36 | |
| With. | 01:02:38 | |
| Provisions in the zoning ordinance. | 01:02:39 | |
| The Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants. | 01:02:42 | |
| The petition. | 01:02:45 | |
| Petitioners Subdivision control variance modifications. The meeting held on the 13th day. | 01:02:47 | |
| Of April. | 01:02:54 | |
| 2026. | 01:02:54 | |
| And we're going to have to add conditions. | 01:02:58 | |
| No, no. | 01:03:03 | |
| It's gonna be Hill. | 01:03:07 | |
| OK. So the next one OK. | 01:03:09 | |
| So no conditions. | 01:03:11 | |
| On 16. | 01:03:13 | |
| So that's all you're about. Does that complete your ballot? | 01:03:17 | |
| All right. We have a completed ballot. I'm looking for a second. | 01:03:19 | |
| Second, I do have a second any discussion? | 01:03:22 | |
| No further discussion. All in favor signify by. | 01:03:26 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:03:29 | |
| Thank you. All right. | 01:03:31 | |
| 17. | 01:03:34 | |
| I've got 17 also 17 also. | 01:03:35 | |
| Ballot for primary approval of the sub of a major subdivision. | 01:03:52 | |
| Ordinance Authority. | 01:03:57 | |
| Statutory authority. IC367-4701. | 01:03:59 | |
| Comma ETSEQ. | 01:04:06 | |
| Period. The subdivision. Its name is Spring Hill Subdivision. Tape is major. | 01:04:09 | |
| The docket number is FC. | 01:04:13 | |
| 03. | 01:04:16 | |
| Dash 26. | 01:04:17 | |
| Dash 17. | 01:04:19 | |
| Applicants owners name. | 01:04:21 | |
| Spring Hill Holdings. | 01:04:23 | |
| LLC. | 01:04:25 | |
| One the petitioner has met the following requirements. | 01:04:27 | |
| A Preliminary plans provided. | 01:04:32 | |
| The certificate certifications. | 01:04:36 | |
| Certifications. | 01:04:41 | |
| Demonstrating compliance with IDM Rule 5. | 01:04:43 | |
| See Platt provided identifies all. | 01:04:49 | |
| Pertinent information pursuant to the. | 01:04:53 | |
| SCO in the Floyd County Planning Commission. | 01:04:57 | |
| Our Planning and Zoning Commission rules and procedures. | 01:05:00 | |
| D Geo Technical report provided. | 01:05:05 | |
| It's not the traffic impact study. | 01:05:08 | |
| Provided. | 01:05:13 | |
| F Phase One Environmental Audit report. | 01:05:15 | |
| Provided which is not applicable. | 01:05:18 | |
| G site plan provides. | 01:05:22 | |
| Provided that shows topographic. | 01:05:24 | |
| Topographic. | 01:05:27 | |
| Wetlands flood. | 01:05:28 | |
| Hazard areas, steep slopes, those exceeding 16%. | 01:05:30 | |
| In shows in soils shown. | 01:05:34 | |
| On the soil. | 01:05:38 | |
| Survey of the Floyd County of having severe limitations for Urban Development. | 01:05:39 | |
| Age the lots. | 01:05:46 | |
| One all lots either comply with. | 01:05:48 | |
| The Floyd County zoning ordinance requirement or a subdivision. | 01:05:52 | |
| Subdivision control. | 01:05:57 | |
| Has been approved for. | 01:05:59 | |
| Non conforming lots. | 01:06:01 | |
| Two lots are not laid out along existing arterial. | 01:06:06 | |
| Our collector of local roads. | 01:06:11 | |
| Three lots. | 01:06:13 | |
| All lots meet. | 01:06:15 | |
| The length requirements. | 01:06:16 | |
| Of the. | 01:06:19 | |
| SCO. | 01:06:20 | |
| Streets. | 01:06:21 | |
| One streets and cul de sacs comply. | 01:06:24 | |
| With dimensional and geographical standards. | 01:06:27 | |
| Of the SEO. | 01:06:30 | |
| 2 traffic. | 01:06:32 | |
| Calming measures are identified. | 01:06:34 | |
| Where more than 30 lots are provided. | 01:06:37 | |
| 3. | 01:06:41 | |
| In a public St. serving this subdivision. | 01:06:42 | |
| Meets the SEO surface type. | 01:06:45 | |
| In right away requirements. | 01:06:48 | |
| 4 All streets are named. | 01:06:51 | |
| 5. | 01:06:54 | |
| There are. | 01:06:55 | |
| Not any permanent dead in streets. | 01:06:56 | |
| Or any private streets. | 01:06:59 | |
| 6. | 01:07:02 | |
| Approval received for any subdivision streets. | 01:07:06 | |
| That intersect. | 01:07:09 | |
| With the state highway. | 01:07:10 | |
| It's not applicable. | 01:07:13 | |
| 7 Curbs and gutters conform. | 01:07:15 | |
| To the N dot standard specifications or equivalent standards as determined by the county engineer. | 01:07:18 | |
| J Driveways, intersections and entries entrances. | 01:07:27 | |
| Excuse me a second. | 01:07:31 | |
| J Driveways, intersections, and entrances. | 01:07:41 | |
| 1-2 subdivision injuries are provided. | 01:07:45 | |
| Where 50 or more lots are proposed. | 01:07:49 | |
| Two driveway separations meet the requirements of the. | 01:07:53 | |
| SEO. | 01:07:58 | |
| Three all driveways and intersections are located in accordance with the SCO. | 01:08:00 | |
| K Sidewalks. | 01:08:06 | |
| Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the subdivision streets. | 01:08:08 | |
| Where the gross density of the subdivision is more. | 01:08:12 | |
| Than one lot per acre. | 01:08:15 | |
| Two, pedestrian access is provided. | 01:08:18 | |
| To any park common space. | 01:08:22 | |
| Our recreation facility located within the subdivision. | 01:08:24 | |
| 3 Protective. | 01:08:30 | |
| Covenants. | 01:08:33 | |
| Assign the obligation for the. | 01:08:35 | |
| The maintenance and repair of the sidewalks and trails. | 01:08:37 | |
| To lots owners association. | 01:08:40 | |
| All covenants are. | 01:08:45 | |
| Consistent with this. | 01:08:47 | |
| SCO. | 01:08:49 | |
| Two, petitioner has. | 01:08:50 | |
| Met the following requirements for drainage and storage stormwater. | 01:08:53 | |
| AN dot IDNR approval. | 01:08:59 | |
| Obtain. | 01:09:03 | |
| For altercations to the natural drainage pattern in natural stream patterns. | 01:09:05 | |
| Caused by the construction of the subdivision. | 01:09:10 | |
| B. Any drainage system. | 01:09:14 | |
| Will be installed. Meets the standard. | 01:09:16 | |
| Of the SCO. | 01:09:20 | |
| See drainage report. | 01:09:21 | |
| Has is provided. | 01:09:23 | |
| 3 Petitioner. | 01:09:27 | |
| Has provided. | 01:09:28 | |
| A letter confir. | 01:09:30 | |
| Confirming availability in willingness to serve for the necessary utilities. Water. | 01:09:31 | |
| Sewer. | 01:09:38 | |
| Fire Protection. | 01:09:39 | |
| Telephone. | 01:09:40 | |
| Gas and electric. | 01:09:41 | |
| 4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer. | 01:09:44 | |
| Or septic service. | 01:09:48 | |
| A service. | 01:09:50 | |
| For subdivision, lots will be extended to the IDE. | 01:09:52 | |
| Approved. Approved municipal. | 01:09:56 | |
| Or county owned. | 01:10:00 | |
| Or. | 01:10:02 | |
| Operated sanitary sewer system. | 01:10:04 | |
| Which is not applicable. | 01:10:07 | |
| B Conditions used. | 01:10:09 | |
| To approve by the Floyd County Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:10:12 | |
| For a news. | 01:10:15 | |
| Wastewater treatment plant is not applicable. | 01:10:16 | |
| Or the septic which? | 01:10:20 | |
| It's not applicable. | 01:10:22 | |
| Umm. | 01:10:25 | |
| I'll go. The septic systems meet the following requirements. It's not applicable. The ISDH approval provides for all. | 01:10:32 | |
| Septic systems and filters. This is not going to be a septic system. | 01:10:40 | |
| It's gonna be sanitary. | 01:10:44 | |
| So. | 01:10:47 | |
| The decision upon careful review. | 01:10:49 | |
| The Floyd County. | 01:10:51 | |
| Planning Commission hereby grants. | 01:10:52 | |
| The petition primary application for major subdivision. | 01:10:55 | |
| In the meeting held This meeting held on the 13th day of April 2026. | 01:10:59 | |
| Primary approval is based on. | 01:11:04 | |
| Completion of the following conditions. | 01:11:07 | |
| One show location. | 01:11:11 | |
| Location of the easement. | 01:11:12 | |
| Of on the plat before the final. | 01:11:14 | |
| Plat approval. | 01:11:17 | |
| 2A maximum grade of 14% is approved. | 01:11:20 | |
| For the street leading to lots 27 through 33. | 01:11:24 | |
| Approximately 400 feet, known as Thelma. | 01:11:29 | |
| Or yeah, Thelma Lane. | 01:11:32 | |
| Per FC-03. | 01:11:34 | |
| Dash 26-16. | 01:11:38 | |
| 3 drainage. | 01:11:41 | |
| Storm water. | 01:11:43 | |
| In erosion control plans must be updated. | 01:11:44 | |
| And submitted to the Platte Stormwater Department for review and given. | 01:11:47 | |
| Given by the department prior. | 01:11:53 | |
| To final plat. | 01:11:55 | |
| Approval. | 01:11:57 | |
| Four add to the HOA covenants. | 01:11:59 | |
| Either a recommendation. | 01:12:03 | |
| Or requirement. | 01:12:05 | |
| To utilize the most up-to-date. | 01:12:06 | |
| Indiana Indiana NET Department of Natural Resources. | 01:12:09 | |
| Tree species list. | 01:12:13 | |
| For any tree plantings. | 01:12:16 | |
| And that is? | 01:12:19 | |
| The petition. | 01:12:21 | |
| In decisions at this point. | 01:12:22 | |
| I thought we got some others they had. Is that true, Victor? | 01:12:26 | |
| The one the one that we needed to add was that they're going to add. | 01:12:29 | |
| To the age I think it's to the HOA for. | 01:12:33 | |
| Don't ride it until we get it approved here. | 01:12:36 | |
| To no in regards to the, let the. | 01:12:38 | |
| Property owners know that there is agriculture. | 01:12:42 | |
| Activity in the area? Is that not what we that you all agree to if I'm not mistaken? | 01:12:46 | |
| Should that be written? | 01:12:51 | |
| He's just saying that. | 01:12:53 | |
| They agreed to include in the HOA documents notice to the homeowners that agricultural activity exists nearby. | 01:12:56 | |
| But notice will be given to HOA. OK. | 01:13:04 | |
| In regards to agriculture activity. | 01:13:07 | |
| Developer will include in the HOA documents. | 01:13:10 | |
| OK, notice to HOA. | 01:13:15 | |
| No, forget that. | 01:13:17 | |
| What are the developer? | 01:13:19 | |
| Will provide in the HOA documents. | 01:13:22 | |
| Well. | 01:13:30 | |
| HOA documents. | 01:13:39 | |
| Notice to homeowners. | 01:13:41 | |
| That agricultural activity. | 01:13:49 | |
| Home. | 01:13:52 | |
| Exists nearby. | 01:13:56 | |
| They'll know it when they smell it. | 01:14:08 | |
| I have a brain. | 01:14:12 | |
| Bring an agricultural. | 01:14:14 | |
| Activity. | 01:14:17 | |
| How Jim Butcher does. | 01:14:22 | |
| Tell me when you're the the other ones involved in the easement. And I think that they've agreed that there would be language in | 01:14:39 | |
| the HOA documents. | 01:14:43 | |
| That the easement remains. | 01:14:47 | |
| And that no homeowner shall. | 01:14:49 | |
| Restrict. | 01:14:52 | |
| Use and access of that easement. | 01:14:53 | |
| Easement to. | 01:14:57 | |
| Existing. | 01:15:00 | |
| That the developer agrees. | 01:15:02 | |
| To put in the HOA documents. | 01:15:07 | |
| Yes. | 01:15:25 | |
| That an easement exists. | 01:15:26 | |
| And that no homeowner. | 01:15:35 | |
| No homeowner. | 01:15:49 | |
| Shall prohibit. | 01:15:50 | |
| Or restrict access. | 01:15:52 | |
| To that easement. | 01:15:56 | |
| Prohibit. | 01:15:57 | |
| And what did you say? Pro shall put Arboretum. | 01:16:00 | |
| The use of that easement. | 01:16:05 | |
| The news. | 01:16:12 | |
| Agriculture is within their future. | 01:16:15 | |
| Is that is that the only easement on the? | 01:16:18 | |
| Property. | 01:16:20 | |
| Do you would you prefer if we specifically reference Fentress easement just to make clear? | 01:16:22 | |
| Clear what we're talking about, are you? | 01:16:27 | |
| Records the lot numbers so it's great. | 01:16:32 | |
| Yeah, yeah. If you just in front of the very beginning of both of those, if you just put yes. | 01:16:35 | |
| I'll do that here. | 01:16:42 | |
| Just don't don't change anything. Just add feather. | 01:16:44 | |
| He spelled it. I want to make sure it's got to be here. | 01:16:50 | |
| Fritters Fentress easement. | 01:16:55 | |
| I wanna make sure. | 01:16:57 | |
| Print filter easement. | 01:16:59 | |
| Developer agrees to put in the HO. | 01:17:04 | |
| A documents that and even exist and no homeowner. | 01:17:07 | |
| Shall prohibit or restrict that that use of the. | 01:17:11 | |
| Correct. And then do you have the other one? | 01:17:15 | |
| Developer will provide. | 01:17:18 | |
| In the. | 01:17:20 | |
| Documents. | 01:17:23 | |
| Notice to the homeowner. | 01:17:24 | |
| Trust that agricultural. | 01:17:25 | |
| Homeowners that agricultural. | 01:17:32 | |
| What activities are next nearby? | 01:17:35 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 01:17:38 | |
| OK, it's almost the end of their page. We got a little wordy on those. | 01:17:40 | |
| I know, I know. | 01:17:45 | |
| OK, I'm going to. | 01:17:48 | |
| Go back through those. | 01:17:49 | |
| Just the ones you added please. | 01:17:52 | |
| In that this is. | 01:17:54 | |
| On. | 01:17:56 | |
| I just want to make sure that you all know that this is on FC-0326-17. | 01:17:57 | |
| This is just on what we added. | 01:18:03 | |
| Five the developer will provide in the HOA documents. | 01:18:07 | |
| Notice to the homeowners. | 01:18:11 | |
| That agricultural activities are nearby. | 01:18:14 | |
| Exist nearby. Exist nearby. | 01:18:19 | |
| OK. | 01:18:26 | |
| Six Pinterest easement. | 01:18:29 | |
| Developers. | 01:18:33 | |
| Agree to put in the HOA documents that the an easement exists. | 01:18:34 | |
| In no homeowners. | 01:18:39 | |
| Shall prohibit. | 01:18:40 | |
| Or restrict that use of that easement. | 01:18:42 | |
| Yeah, OK, Mr. Finters. | 01:18:45 | |
| All right. No, you don't ask it. | 01:18:47 | |
| Yeah, that's right. | 01:18:50 | |
| I want to make sure that OK that that. | 01:18:52 | |
| Conclude your ballot. Is that correct? That is correct. | 01:18:55 | |
| OK, so. | 01:18:57 | |
| Are you good with? | 01:18:59 | |
| OK, that ballot is complete. I'm looking for a second. | 01:19:00 | |
| I'll second that we have a second. Any further discussion? | 01:19:03 | |
| If none. | 01:19:07 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 01:19:08 | |
| Aye. And those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 01:19:10 | |
| All righty, next item. | 01:19:13 | |
| Let's move this, move this ship on. | 01:19:15 | |
| Agenda item docket FC-03-206-18 Primary approval. | 01:19:18 | |
| Of a major subdivision, applicant is seeking primary approval of a commercial subdivision to be known as Summit Ridge Commons. | 01:19:24 | |
| The proposal covers 17.6 acres. | 01:19:32 | |
| To be split into six lots with a common area. | 01:19:35 | |
| Common area lot and gross density of 2.93 units per acre. | 01:19:37 | |
| Application Application is accompanied by two development standard variance requests. | 01:19:44 | |
| That are heard. | 01:19:49 | |
| That. | 01:19:51 | |
| Are heard before the April 13th. | 01:19:51 | |
| It should have been at April 13th. Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:19:55 | |
| I heard before at the April 13th 5:00 PM Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:19:59 | |
| Applicant Prime. | 01:20:04 | |
| Property Development Company, LLC. | 01:20:06 | |
| Site unaddressed location. It's on East Luther Rd. north of Lawrence Bannat. | 01:20:09 | |
| And east of Hwy. 160. | 01:20:16 | |
| At this time, Frank. | 01:20:19 | |
| It's your all right. | 01:20:20 | |
| Docket #FC32618. Petitioner, Prime Property development Co. | 01:20:22 | |
| Representative Jason Copperweight. | 01:20:27 | |
| Location along Hwy. 150 on an unaddressed lot. | 01:20:28 | |
| Parcel #2241983DOT000-6. | 01:20:32 | |
| Request major subdivision. Primary approval of the major subdivision. | 01:20:38 | |
| For Summit Ridge Commons, this is also a commercial subdivision. | 01:20:42 | |
| Zoning District, General commercial. | 01:20:46 | |
| The petitioner is seeking preliminary approval of a commercial subdivision to be known as Summit Ridge Commons. | 01:20:48 | |
| The proposal covers 17.6 acres to be split into six lots, with a common area utilizing 8.88 acres. | 01:20:53 | |
| With the remainder of the property to be retained is undeveloped land. | 01:20:59 | |
| The developed portion has a proposed gross density of .68 units per acre, not excluding common area and right of way. | 01:21:03 | |
| The common area contains a total of 0.477 acres and is located at the north of the parent tract. | 01:21:10 | |
| Being developed. | 01:21:16 | |
| The property is located within a commercial growth area of the Lafayette Township and falls under the Highlander Point Overlay | 01:21:18 | |
| District, with the Highlander Point Corridor identified as the main commercial corridor and a primary gateway for the county as | 01:21:22 | |
| identified by the Comprehensive Plan. | 01:21:27 | |
| This property is surrounded by commercial and residential growth areas within the Lafayette Township. | 01:21:32 | |
| This land is designated as a growth area due to its proximity to utilities, Hwy. 64 and existing amenities such as shops, schools, | 01:21:37 | |
| and other institutions. | 01:21:41 | |
| With an intent to focus development here rather than in areas that the plan has designated as transitional or agricultural areas. | 01:21:45 | |
| To the east is the platted subdivision of Fairway Estates is owned a residential suburban. | 01:21:52 | |
| To the north along the southern side E loop of East Luther Rd. are a vacant property and a single family residence zone. Urban | 01:21:57 | |
| residential. | 01:22:00 | |
| To the West, across Hwy. 150 are wooded properties, zoned residential, suburban and urban residential. | 01:22:05 | |
| To the southwest. | 01:22:10 | |
| South and Southeast are various property zone, general commercial. | 01:22:11 | |
| The site has proposed access through the. | 01:22:15 | |
| New proposed signalized intersection along Hwy. 150 that will connect to the new JC on the other side of the highway. | 01:22:18 | |
| The site will further connect. | 01:22:24 | |
| The site proposes further connection to the Lafollette. | 01:22:28 | |
| Commercial platted. | 01:22:31 | |
| Subdivision to the South and will have a road ext. | 01:22:32 | |
| To allow for connections to East Luther Rd. should further. | 01:22:36 | |
| Future development occur. | 01:22:39 | |
| The proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to serve letters from the local public services and was included with the | 01:22:41 | |
| regional traffic study. | 01:22:44 | |
| A plot review was held on April 1st. | 01:22:48 | |
| For the staff review. | 01:22:50 | |
| The petitioner has provided A compliant preliminary plan for the project. | 01:22:52 | |
| The petitioner has provided certification that all drainage and environmental requirements will be complied with and that there | 01:22:55 | |
| are no known outstanding issues concerning item. | 01:22:58 | |
| This is page nine of the actual application. | 01:23:02 | |
| A geotechnical report was performed by Paul Primavera and Associates. | 01:23:04 | |
| A phase one environmental study is not required. | 01:23:08 | |
| Our regional traffic study was completed and provides adequate level of service. | 01:23:10 | |
| A variance is requested from the 200 foot long frontage width requirement for lots one through 4 and lot 6. | 01:23:15 | |
| And from the one acre requirement for lots 1-2 and four. | 01:23:21 | |
| This was approved. | 01:23:24 | |
| Before the Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:23:26 | |
| Other locks meet the size and frontage with standards of the Floyd County zoning ordinance for the residential suburban district | 01:23:28 | |
| and are laid out along subdivision streets compliant with. | 01:23:32 | |
| Subdivision control and standards. | 01:23:36 | |
| And I apologize that should read as general commercial district, non residential suburban. | 01:23:39 | |
| La Follette Station Dr. is continued to the north of the subdivision. | 01:23:44 | |
| From the South connection point and is proposed as a subdivision St. that connects to the La Follette. | 01:23:47 | |
| Commercial subdivision along Lawrence Bennett Rd. | 01:23:52 | |
| Riley Drive is also provided as a subdivision St. providing access to US Hwy. 1 fifties anticipated intersection. | 01:23:55 | |
| Sidewalks are provided. | 01:24:01 | |
| A drainage report and preliminary plan were submitted with the application. | 01:24:03 | |
| Full drainage compliance with. | 01:24:07 | |
| County stormwater regulations will be required prior to secondary approval. | 01:24:08 | |
| The Stormwater Director offers the following comment. Access to the two proposed detention areas will need to be considered before | 01:24:12 | |
| primary or before final approval. | 01:24:15 | |
| The petitioner has provided willingness to serve letters from CenterPoint Energy for natural gas. | 01:24:20 | |
| Harrison RMC, Floyd's Knobs Water Company and Highlander Fire Protection. | 01:24:24 | |
| Protection District. | 01:24:28 | |
| Wastewater will be provided by New Albany Wastewater. | 01:24:29 | |
| For staff comments. | 01:24:32 | |
| The 2017 Comprehensive Plan indicates an opportunity to focus on entrepreneurship. | 01:24:34 | |
| Detailed on pages 2831 and 37 of that plan. | 01:24:38 | |
| Entrepreneurs and commercial uses do not have a uniform set of needs for space. | 01:24:42 | |
| The website loopnets. | 01:24:46 | |
| Loopnet let's. | 01:24:48 | |
| Commercial lots in the local area and of the 16 listed lots, two of them were under one acre, potentially indicating a lack of | 01:24:49 | |
| supply in the size range. | 01:24:53 | |
| While This site is wooded, the site was previously cleared as recently as 2010. Many of the trees on the site are invasive species | 01:24:57 | |
| that do not add to the rural character or ecological health of the community. | 01:25:01 | |
| For staff recommendations. | 01:25:06 | |
| Whereas the drainage and stormwater plants are requirements before the final approval. | 01:25:09 | |
| Where the subdivision control ordinance requires developments, meet zoning ordinance, where a covenant for a shared maintenance | 01:25:13 | |
| should be on record and where the comprehensive plan encourages. | 01:25:17 | |
| Protecting the rural character of the community as well as promoting entrepreneurship and where Lafollette Station. | 01:25:22 | |
| Drive is a private road. | 01:25:27 | |
| Staff recommends the following conditions be met before final approval. | 01:25:29 | |
| One final approval of drainage stormwater violence. | 01:25:33 | |
| To a development standards. | 01:25:35 | |
| Variance for the lot area and lot with frontage is approved for. | 01:25:37 | |
| FC 3/26/19 and FC 3/26/20. Both of those have been approved. | 01:25:41 | |
| Commercial 3 Commercial Association Covenants for shared maintenance of open space or add to the Commercial Association covenants | 01:25:46 | |
| either a recommendation or requirement to utilize the most up-to-date Indiana Department of Natural Resources Trees species list | 01:25:51 | |
| for any tree plantings. | 01:25:56 | |
| And have any shared access? | 01:26:02 | |
| Shared Maintenance agreement for use of Shared Access and maintenance agreement for use of Lafollette. | 01:26:06 | |
| Station drive or create a temporary cul-de-sac dead end where La Follette Station Dr. is intended to connect. | 01:26:11 | |
| All right. Thanks, Frank. Anybody have any questions for Frank on the staff report? | 01:26:19 | |
| I do not. | 01:26:24 | |
| Do not nobody understand. | 01:26:25 | |
| Thanks Frank. Appreciate you an applicant come forward state your name and address for you and Jason Copper weight from Avera and | 01:26:27 | |
| Associates, 1000 Bell Lane, New Albany, IN. | 01:26:31 | |
| They representing the applicant. | 01:26:35 | |
| To be brief, I don't have the staff always. As always, did a great job. | 01:26:38 | |
| Presenting the project. | 01:26:44 | |
| The only thing I would add is that the last. | 01:26:46 | |
| The last recommendation that they made? | 01:26:49 | |
| Which is. | 01:26:51 | |
| A temporary turn around. | 01:26:52 | |
| Access through La Follette Drive. | 01:26:54 | |
| I would add a third item to, that is if they were to find a secondary access. | 01:26:56 | |
| Approved by the Commission. | 01:27:01 | |
| That that would also be an acceptable condition. | 01:27:02 | |
| Acceptable. | 01:27:05 | |
| Scenario that satisfies the condition. | 01:27:07 | |
| That would be versus otherwise we agree with that. That would replace. | 01:27:09 | |
| That turn around and said one of the three OK, temporary turn around, OK. | 01:27:13 | |
| Access through the follow drive OK. | 01:27:18 | |
| Or. | 01:27:20 | |
| Second entrance through some other property. | 01:27:21 | |
| If it becomes available. | 01:27:23 | |
| That would be. | 01:27:25 | |
| Or create a temp you still want create one of the 33. | 01:27:27 | |
| Would meet. | 01:27:30 | |
| Sure. | 01:27:35 | |
| As approved. OK. | 01:27:37 | |
| All right, that's fair enough. Make that easy. | 01:27:38 | |
| Less writing. | 01:27:40 | |
| Fair enough. | 01:27:41 | |
| Otherwise, we agree with the conditions you done. | 01:27:44 | |
| Yes. Any questions for Mr. Copper? Wait on the board. | 01:27:46 | |
| All right, all righty. Thank you, Mr. Copper weight. | 01:27:50 | |
| Now we open up for anybody who wants to speak in favor. | 01:27:54 | |
| Please come forward. | 01:27:57 | |
| State your name and address. | 01:28:00 | |
| For the record. | 01:28:03 | |
| My name is Steve Thiemann. I live it. | 01:28:04 | |
| 3593 Lafayette Parkway. | 01:28:06 | |
| The only thing I want to bring up is. | 01:28:09 | |
| Those are private streets. | 01:28:11 | |
| Lafayette. | 01:28:13 | |
| So how? How do you handle that? | 01:28:15 | |
| The HOA. | 01:28:18 | |
| Takes care of those streets. | 01:28:19 | |
| So if there's traffic coming down, is there going to be a light? | 01:28:21 | |
| At 1:50. | 01:28:26 | |
| OK. Yeah. So. | 01:28:28 | |
| I mean, we take care of our own streets as they're all private. So how do you handle that? | 01:28:30 | |
| We'll have to give him time to come back up and and. | 01:28:35 | |
| OK. All right. That's all. OK. Thanks, Steve. All righty. | 01:28:40 | |
| Anybody else in favor? | 01:28:45 | |
| OK, now we open up. Anybody that's against it in opposition, please come forward. | 01:28:48 | |
| Thank you, Lord. | 01:28:56 | |
| All right, this time, Mr. Cartwright, would you like to just. | 01:28:58 | |
| Refer to Mr. | 01:29:02 | |
| Ingleman's comment. | 01:29:03 | |
| So Mr. Feenyman is correct as. | 01:29:04 | |
| As I say, well should know because he developed the property. | 01:29:06 | |
| La Follette Drive is a private drive that is maintained by the Lot Owners Association. | 01:29:09 | |
| In the Folly station. | 01:29:14 | |
| I think it is the. It is the applicant's desire. | 01:29:16 | |
| Perhaps the desire of a few of the lot owners that maybe that road become a public road at some point in the future. | 01:29:18 | |
| Maintained by the county. | 01:29:23 | |
| But it requires participation of all the lot owners. | 01:29:25 | |
| So it is my clients. | 01:29:29 | |
| Interest to pursue that in the future. | 01:29:33 | |
| In participation with the county or maybe the county would pursue that. | 01:29:36 | |
| Either way. | 01:29:41 | |
| The the physical pavement. | 01:29:42 | |
| Enters into. | 01:29:44 | |
| This property and so it physically can be connect. | 01:29:45 | |
| Now, legal access is another issue. | 01:29:48 | |
| And that's that's the reason for the three. | 01:29:50 | |
| Options that we talked about either a temporary turnaround if we can't get legal access. | 01:29:54 | |
| Get legal access. | 01:29:59 | |
| Or develop some alternate. | 01:30:00 | |
| The entrance some alternate third entrance to come on to come to connect to the South end of the proposed St. one of those three | 01:30:03 | |
| items have to occur. | 01:30:08 | |
| Before we get secondary approved, OK. | 01:30:13 | |
| So right across. That's why I wanna. That's why I wanted to leave some options open for. | 01:30:15 | |
| One of those three, but that's per staff. | 01:30:20 | |
| Right recommendation. | 01:30:22 | |
| Correct. Yes, so. | 01:30:23 | |
| Still haven't seen that Uncle Bill for a year. | 01:30:26 | |
| OK, so there's. | 01:30:30 | |
| But that in order to get that to be public Rd. | 01:30:31 | |
| Everybody has to agree to that, correct? That's correct. And then you have to verify this, that the county can accept it if it's | 01:30:36 | |
| built to their respects and the county would have to agree to accept it. That's correct. So right now all all the commercial lot | 01:30:40 | |
| owners. | 01:30:44 | |
| Owned to the center of Lafollette Station Dr. and then there is a utility and access easement across the roadway so they all would | 01:30:49 | |
| have to deed. | 01:30:53 | |
| A small portion. It'd be their benefit to have it county, wouldn't they somewhat. | 01:30:57 | |
| I mean that's I would think so that's opinion, right? I got it. Everybody's got one. You're dealing with several lot owners and. | 01:31:02 | |
| Personalities, You know how they. | 01:31:08 | |
| All right, good, Mr. Thiemann? Sure, absolutely. | 01:31:09 | |
| Playing for president and we've all voted in. | 01:31:13 | |
| They all agree. | 01:31:16 | |
| OK. | 01:31:18 | |
| Did we talk to you after the meeting? | 01:31:19 | |
| Bring that to the Commissioners. | 01:31:25 | |
| We're not buying, but bring it to the Commissioner. | 01:31:29 | |
| We're not buying. | 01:31:33 | |
| Understand. Thank you. | 01:31:37 | |
| Any other questions? Any other questions for Mr. Copper? | 01:31:39 | |
| Alrighty. Thank you, Mr. Jason. At this time, we'll open it up for a ballot if anybody has one, please. | 01:31:42 | |
| FC03. | 01:31:48 | |
| Dash 26-18, afternoon. | 01:31:50 | |
| Prime property development company. | 01:31:54 | |
| Number one, petitioner has met all the following requirements. A preliminary plan provided. | 01:31:56 | |
| B Certification. | 01:32:01 | |
| Demonstrating compliance with. | 01:32:03 | |
| IDE and Rule 5C Plat provided identifying all pertinent information pursuant to the SCO. | 01:32:05 | |
| And Floyd County Planning and Zoning Commission rules and procedures. | 01:32:11 | |
| D Geotechnical report provided. | 01:32:15 | |
| E Traffic study provided. | 01:32:18 | |
| F is not applicable G site plan provided that shows topography. | 01:32:21 | |
| Wetlands. | 01:32:26 | |
| Blood hazard areas. Steep slopes. | 01:32:27 | |
| In soil shown under soil survey of Floyd County as having. | 01:32:29 | |
| Severe limitations for Urban Development. | 01:32:33 | |
| H Lights. Subdivision control. | 01:32:37 | |
| Been approved for conforming lots. | 01:32:40 | |
| Watch for my lay down along existing arterial collectors or local streets. | 01:32:47 | |
| Three, all lots meet the. | 01:32:52 | |
| Length requirements of the SCO. | 01:32:54 | |
| Ah St. streets in Cul de Sacs comply with the dimensional geographic standards of the SCO. 2 Traffic calming measures are | 01:32:58 | |
| identified. | 01:33:02 | |
| No, that's not actual. | 01:33:07 | |
| #3 any public streets. | 01:33:09 | |
| Serving the subdivision meets the SCO surface types and right of way requirements #4 All streets are named. | 01:33:11 | |
| #5 there are. | 01:33:18 | |
| Or not any pertinent dead end streets or any private streets? | 01:33:19 | |
| Number six. | 01:33:25 | |
| Indiana dot approval received for any subdivision streets intersect with the state highway. | 01:33:26 | |
| #7 Curbs and gutters conform. | 01:33:31 | |
| Did the Indiana dot standard specification for equivalent standards. | 01:33:34 | |
| As determined by the county engineer. | 01:33:38 | |
| J Driveways, intersection entrances. | 01:33:40 | |
| Number one is not Apple. | 01:33:43 | |
| Pool #2 driveway separation meets the pharmacy SEO. | 01:33:45 | |
| #3 All driveways intersections are located in accordance with the SCO. | 01:33:49 | |
| OK, sidewalk side Zack. | 01:33:53 | |
| Walks Harper would write it for the subdivision Streets number 2 is not applicable. | 01:33:55 | |
| #3 Protective cobbles assigned the obligation of the maintenance and repair of sidewalks and trails. | 01:34:02 | |
| To the lot owners associations. | 01:34:08 | |
| How can covenants are consistent with the SCO? | 01:34:11 | |
| #2 Petitioner has. | 01:34:15 | |
| Practitioner. | 01:34:20 | |
| Has will be compliant with all the following requirements or drains using stormwater priority secondary approval. | 01:34:21 | |
| A ID and our approval obtained for. | 01:34:28 | |
| Alterations to the natural drainage patterns and natural. | 01:34:32 | |
| Stream patterns caused by the construction of the subdivision B. Any drainage. | 01:34:35 | |
| System being installed meets the minimum standards of the SCO. | 01:34:40 | |
| See drainage reports provided. | 01:34:44 | |
| #3 Petitioner has provided a letter. | 01:34:46 | |
| Confirming availability and willingness to serve. | 01:34:49 | |
| For all necessary utilities #4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewers. | 01:34:52 | |
| Service for the subdivision lasts. | 01:34:58 | |
| Will be extended to IDE and approved municipal. | 01:35:01 | |
| Or county owned or operated sanitary sewer. | 01:35:04 | |
| System. | 01:35:08 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants. | 01:35:12 | |
| Primary approval for major subdivision. | 01:35:18 | |
| At the meeting held on the 13th day of April. | 01:35:22 | |
| 2026. | 01:35:24 | |
| Primary approval is based on a collision of filing conditions. Final. | 01:35:26 | |
| Approval of all drainage of stormwater plans to finalize commercial association covenants. | 01:35:30 | |
| For shared maintenance of open spaces. | 01:35:35 | |
| #3 add to the commercial association comments either a recommendation. | 01:35:37 | |
| For requirement to utilize the most up-to-date Indiana Department of Natural Resources tree species list. | 01:35:42 | |
| For any tree plantings #4 provided interlocal agreement. | 01:35:47 | |
| For use of Lafollette Station Dr. are created temporary cul-de-sac. | 01:35:52 | |
| Dead end where F La Follette Station Dr. is intended to connect. | 01:35:57 | |
| Or another. | 01:36:02 | |
| Access point as approved. | 01:36:03 | |
| Pasta that completes my belt. | 01:36:05 | |
| All righty, we have a ballot in a second. | 01:36:08 | |
| I do have a second any conversation, any discussion. | 01:36:10 | |
| If none all in favor, signify by aye those opposed likewise. Thank you guys. | 01:36:13 | |
| All righty, don't know anybody leave till we get the ballot signed right now. | 01:36:20 | |
| Is there any other business, Frank? | 01:36:24 | |
| OK, there's no new discussion at this time. I need a motion to adjourn. | 01:36:28 | |
| So moved. | 01:36:32 | |
| Second, all in favor signify by thank you guys and girls. | 01:36:34 |
Transcript
| Comedian Floyd County Planning Commission held on the 13th day. | 00:00:00 | |
| At 7:00 PM. | 00:00:03 | |
| At this time, we'd like to do the pledge allegiance or by standing on our flag. | 00:00:04 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. | 00:00:09 | |
| And the jury Republic for which it stands. | 00:00:14 | |
| One nation under God. | 00:00:16 | |
| Individual with leveraging access for all. | 00:00:18 | |
| All right. Thank you very much for that. At this time, we'd like to have roll call. | 00:00:22 | |
| Here. | 00:00:29 | |
| Here. | 00:00:31 | |
| Here. | 00:00:33 | |
| Mr. Brinkler. | 00:00:36 | |
| Mr. Badshaw here. | 00:00:38 | |
| Mr. Luke. | 00:00:42 | |
| Here. | 00:00:43 | |
| Mr. Owner here. | 00:00:44 | |
| All righty, this time we'd like to have somebody. | 00:00:46 | |
| Make a motion to accept the meeting. | 00:00:50 | |
| 10 minutes for March 9th. | 00:00:52 | |
| I'll make a motion to accept the minutes for March 9th. | 00:00:54 | |
| 2nd We have a second. We have a second. | 00:00:58 | |
| Any other discussion on favor signify by? | 00:01:00 | |
| Aye. All righty. Thank you very much at this time. | 00:01:03 | |
| Just like to bring to the attention everybody that we only have 6. | 00:01:06 | |
| Of our 9. | 00:01:11 | |
| Board members that can vote. | 00:01:13 | |
| So anybody would want to table an issue tonight you're that's at your. | 00:01:15 | |
| Discretion. | 00:01:20 | |
| We will allow that so. | 00:01:21 | |
| When your docket number, it's agenda item is. | 00:01:24 | |
| Called. You have the right to do that so. | 00:01:27 | |
| At this time. | 00:01:29 | |
| We have no announcements. We have no old business, new business. | 00:01:32 | |
| I'd like to have our. | 00:01:36 | |
| Attorney just go through a little bit of our procedures and she'll she'll explain that now at this time. | 00:01:38 | |
| Go ahead, Christy. | 00:01:44 | |
| And we've got this up on the screen as well. Hopefully this microphone's working a little bit better than it was earlier. | 00:01:45 | |
| So we'll start by the chairman. Mr. Unruh will read the docket. | 00:01:50 | |
| Item and. | 00:01:54 | |
| Agenda number. | 00:01:57 | |
| Then the director and staff will come up, give their staff report. The applicant will then have 10 minutes to present their | 00:01:58 | |
| application request to the board. | 00:02:03 | |
| Everything this evening is directed towards the board, not to people in the audience. | 00:02:07 | |
| Thereafter, the board members may ask the applicant questions if they have any questions for the applicant, the petitioner. | 00:02:12 | |
| After that, public comments are opened, with those in favor having 10 minutes. | 00:02:18 | |
| That's not 10 minutes per person, that's 10 minutes for everybody in the room that's in favor of that. | 00:02:23 | |
| Application. | 00:02:27 | |
| And then we shift to those that are in opposition. | 00:02:28 | |
| And that again is a combined 10 minutes for everybody in the room that is in opposition of that agenda item. | 00:02:32 | |
| We do state require that you come up and state your name and address for the record prior to giving your in favor opposition | 00:02:39 | |
| comments. Again, those comments are directed to the board, not the applicant or eBay in the audience. After that period of time, | 00:02:44 | |
| the applicant will get 5 minutes to come back up. | 00:02:49 | |
| To rebut or answer questions that are brought up during the public comments and the Board may ask additional questions of the | 00:02:55 | |
| applicant at that point in time. | 00:02:59 | |
| After that, the board will consider a ballot. | 00:03:03 | |
| And thereafter, vote on that ballot that's presented. | 00:03:06 | |
| All righty. Thank you very much. At this time, Frank, if you want to come and start with agenda item 1. | 00:03:10 | |
| What are we doing? | 00:03:17 | |
| Your typos. | 00:03:19 | |
| Thank you. | 00:03:23 | |
| Agent Item 1, Docket number FC 2/26/12. | 00:03:27 | |
| Petitioner TTCJ Properties, LLC. | 00:03:31 | |
| With representatives Chad Ernst and Todd Lanning. | 00:03:34 | |
| Location 4865 Old Vincennes Rd. Police Knobs, Indiana. | 00:03:36 | |
| Request for a development plan review approval. | 00:03:41 | |
| In the general commercial zoning district. | 00:03:44 | |
| Applicant is proposing a development plan for a drive through. | 00:03:47 | |
| Oh, sorry. | 00:03:50 | |
| Also, there were a couple of items before the Board of Zoning Appeals. | 00:03:51 | |
| That were already approved for variances. | 00:03:55 | |
| So applicant is proposing a development plan for a drive through coffee shop located on 0.45 acres in the General Commercial | 00:03:59 | |
| Zoning district along Old Bensons Rd. near the intersection with Hwy. 150. | 00:04:04 | |
| And the Highlander Point Overlay District. | 00:04:10 | |
| The parcel is located between two gas stations with a single family residential subdivision to its rear. | 00:04:12 | |
| And a commercial center across the street. | 00:04:17 | |
| A technical review committee was conducted for the development on. | 00:04:20 | |
| March 19, 2026. Providing recommendations for the development to provide a write in, write out entrance and to adjust car | 00:04:23 | |
| stacking. | 00:04:26 | |
| Additionally, the stormwater department. | 00:04:31 | |
| Director made comments about the placement for the dumpster. | 00:04:34 | |
| The applicant has requested development standards variances for this application to build a primary commercial unit under the | 00:04:37 | |
| minimum square footage and to. | 00:04:41 | |
| And to not provide the transparency requirements for the windows and doors. | 00:04:46 | |
| A conceptual site plan has or was reviewed by staff. | 00:04:51 | |
| Petitioner has. | 00:04:56 | |
| Not met all the development standards for the District. The petitioner has requested 3 development standards. Variances from the | 00:04:59 | |
| Board of Zoning Appeals for facade building material. Less than 30% transparency for front of building. | 00:05:04 | |
| Minimum size of the primary structure less than 2000 square feet. This was at 440 square feet for the proposal. | 00:05:10 | |
| And a withdrawn proposal for no sidewalk along Hwy. 150. | 00:05:16 | |
| A waiver of the development standards requirements is required if. | 00:05:21 | |
| If required to waiver the development standards is. | 00:05:28 | |
| Was granted because the waiver is consistent with the spirit and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:05:31 | |
| The waiver of the transparency requirement supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring flexibility for | 00:05:35 | |
| high quality design. | 00:05:39 | |
| The waiver of the size requirement is consistent with supporting entrepreneurship as it retains the supply of small-scale | 00:05:42 | |
| commercial buildings. | 00:05:46 | |
| Uh. | 00:05:50 | |
| And a waiver is consistent with the intent of the district because the variances are modifying the design elements to fit the | 00:05:55 | |
| unique circumstances of the properties close proximity to a major intersection and a small size lot. | 00:06:00 | |
| The proposed development plan is consistent with the comprehensive plan because the site is located within the Highlander Point. | 00:06:06 | |
| Commercial corridor. | 00:06:11 | |
| And the theme Places to Work. | 00:06:13 | |
| Both economic gardening and fostering and facilitating entrepreneurship are listed as objectives and policies. Small commercial | 00:06:14 | |
| buildings cater. | 00:06:18 | |
| To smaller entrepreneurial efforts and increase the limited stock of small spaces available to the community. | 00:06:22 | |
| The proposed development plan is consistent with the intent of the district as set forth in the Floyd County Zoning Ordinance | 00:06:28 | |
| because as part of the Highlander Point Overlay District. | 00:06:32 | |
| The site sits in an intended premier commercial and office location. | 00:06:35 | |
| The proposed development plan does satisfy the following. | 00:06:40 | |
| Development plan requirements. | 00:06:43 | |
| Signage is designed to create a unified and consistent sign package. Design and location of St. access points minimize congestion. | 00:06:45 | |
| And a development or and the development was updated to include a write in write out only access to open sense. | 00:06:54 | |
| Entrances, streets and internal traffic facilities are compatible with existing and planned streets and adjacent developments. | 00:07:01 | |
| Design and layout of the development has a clear circulation pattern that is sensitive to topography and other natural features. | 00:07:06 | |
| Lighting is designed to create a unified and consistent lighting package for the development. Lighting and parking areas do not | 00:07:11 | |
| exceed 20 feet in height. | 00:07:14 | |
| The proposed development is not in a residential urban zoning district. | 00:07:18 | |
| The proposal is not in a multifamily development. | 00:07:21 | |
| The proposed development is located in the Highlander Point District or the Edwards Hill Gateway District. | 00:07:24 | |
| If the proposed development is located in the. | 00:07:31 | |
| Highlands Point Gateway District or the Edwardsville Gateway District. The following requirements have been met. | 00:07:33 | |
| Building facades that face any. | 00:07:38 | |
| Adjacent St. have a finished facade. | 00:07:40 | |
| Trash collection bins are not placed on or along the facades that face any adjacent St. | 00:07:42 | |
| A technical review committee was hosted on February 19th where concerns were raised over car stacking for the drive through and | 00:07:48 | |
| people turning left into. | 00:07:53 | |
| The site from Old Vinson's Road. | 00:07:57 | |
| The county engineer recommended it write in write out access to Old Vinson's Road and signage stating do not block intersection. | 00:07:59 | |
| Applicant has submitted an updated development plan showing the write in write out access. | 00:08:04 | |
| The stormwater director also requested that the parking and dumpster at the rear of the site be flipped so that the dumpster was. | 00:08:09 | |
| Further from the stormwater channel in the West and the detention basin for the Highlands. | 00:08:14 | |
| This has also been met with the updated. | 00:08:18 | |
| The drainage from the JC gas station to the West funnels through the channels near the dumpster. | 00:08:22 | |
| Actually, that has been changed in just a moment. | 00:08:27 | |
| OK, where the current placement? | 00:08:34 | |
| So one of these is. | 00:08:39 | |
| Recommendations has been met, but where the current placement of the dumpster presents high likelihood of waste and litter | 00:08:40 | |
| entering the stormwater system and either polluting. | 00:08:44 | |
| The ecosystem are blocking the drainage flow where variances were heard by the Board of Zoning Appeals. Staff recommends the | 00:08:48 | |
| following conditions. | 00:08:51 | |
| Provide an updated development plan with placement of the dumpster. | 00:08:54 | |
| On the eastern side of the lot, parking may be placed at an angle according to Section 520, Item E that that part has been | 00:08:57 | |
| submitted. | 00:09:00 | |
| Earlier today. | 00:09:04 | |
| Approval of the variance from the minimum size under. | 00:09:05 | |
| FC 03/26/13 and approval of the. | 00:09:09 | |
| For the building facade under FC 03/26/15. | 00:09:12 | |
| And then provide an updated development plan meeting the standards of section. | 00:09:16 | |
| That has also been met for the sidewalks. | 00:09:21 | |
| That's it for now. | 00:09:25 | |
| All righty. Anybody have any questions for Frank at this time? | 00:09:26 | |
| I do not. No. None. OK. Thank you, Frank. | 00:09:30 | |
| At this time would would the applicant like to come forward? | 00:09:35 | |
| And just for the record, this is agenda item. | 00:09:43 | |
| Docket FC-02-206-12. | 00:09:46 | |
| State your name and address for the rest. Thank you, commissioners. | 00:09:50 | |
| My name is Todd Lanning. | 00:09:53 | |
| I'm with a milestone design group. | 00:09:55 | |
| 108 Damentry Lane. | 00:09:58 | |
| Louisville. | 00:10:01 | |
| 40223. | 00:10:02 | |
| And I represent Bigby Coffee. | 00:10:04 | |
| As well as Chat Ernst, who's with Bigby Coffee as well. | 00:10:07 | |
| I don't have much to add to what Franklin's actually. | 00:10:12 | |
| Mentioned about the project like you incorporate everything that needs to be said. | 00:10:16 | |
| But if you have any questions. | 00:10:20 | |
| For us, we could. | 00:10:23 | |
| Answer those. | 00:10:24 | |
| Any questions? How many square feet is your building? | 00:10:25 | |
| I believe it is 440. | 00:10:29 | |
| Something is it 440 OK. | 00:10:33 | |
| OK. And. | 00:10:36 | |
| Go ahead. | 00:10:39 | |
| Question. How many square feet? | 00:10:39 | |
| And the. | 00:10:43 | |
| Well, that building come in. | 00:10:44 | |
| Prefabricator we it will be becoming prefabricated. | 00:10:47 | |
| OK, OK. All right. | 00:10:51 | |
| I think we need to address the landscape plan. I was doing some math and stuff and the. | 00:10:54 | |
| Trees are too large for the area. | 00:10:58 | |
| OK. | 00:11:00 | |
| Already you have a recommendation for that? No, at some point we just need to talk about it because these are Elm trees are | 00:11:01 | |
| getting 70 feet wide. We're putting them close to the road. | 00:11:05 | |
| There, there's a lot of. | 00:11:09 | |
| Probably better options out there that aren't going to cause as much damage. | 00:11:11 | |
| Condition, that's what yes, I was gonna say we'll just put we'll. | 00:11:16 | |
| Again, I just, I'm doing some quick math today and I think there are some better options that we can probably look at. We'll just. | 00:11:19 | |
| We'll just probably make that to be staff approval. | 00:11:25 | |
| Probably make sense there. | 00:11:28 | |
| Yeah. | 00:11:30 | |
| Yeah, that's usually pretty painless. OK. OK, so I guess maybe I can get in contact with you and, you know, yeah, we can chat. OK. | 00:11:31 | |
| Sounds good. Yeah, so and I have looked at the plan and kind of I think I had too many trees in the back. | 00:11:38 | |
| Maybe one too many and I could probably. | 00:11:43 | |
| Make them smaller. Make smaller trees and. | 00:11:45 | |
| We can get that. | 00:11:48 | |
| Better, yeah. | 00:11:49 | |
| OK. Any other questions? | 00:11:49 | |
| Alright, thanks guys. We'll let you come back up after any comments. Alright, thank you. | 00:11:52 | |
| At this time. | 00:11:57 | |
| We like to open up for anybody like to speak in favor of this. | 00:11:59 | |
| Project. | 00:12:03 | |
| Come forward, please state your name. | 00:12:03 | |
| Address for the record. | 00:12:06 | |
| Looks like nobody's coming forward at this time. Anybody by in opposition? | 00:12:10 | |
| Please come forward. | 00:12:14 | |
| 10 minutes. | 00:12:15 | |
| Alrighty, that closes both of those, obviously. | 00:12:17 | |
| There's no comments. You still have the right to come back up the. | 00:12:21 | |
| Waive that right to come back up. | 00:12:25 | |
| No comments. | 00:12:27 | |
| Let it be known they wave that. | 00:12:28 | |
| That portion of the of the meeting. | 00:12:29 | |
| At this time I'm looking for a ballot. | 00:12:32 | |
| I have a ballot. | 00:12:35 | |
| The name of the development is Bigby Coffee Dockets. | 00:12:41 | |
| FC 02/26/12. | 00:12:46 | |
| The owner is TTC. | 00:12:50 | |
| J Properties. | 00:12:53 | |
| LLC. | 00:12:55 | |
| We reviewed that. | 00:12:58 | |
| On 3/19/26. | 00:13:00 | |
| The findings are that. | 00:13:02 | |
| Petitioner has not met all the developmental standards for the district. | 00:13:04 | |
| A waiver of the development standard is required. | 00:13:09 | |
| If required, a waiver of the development standard is granted because a waiver is consistent with the spirit and the intent of the | 00:13:13 | |
| Comprehensive Plan. | 00:13:17 | |
| The waiver of the transparency requirements supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring the flexibility | 00:13:23 | |
| for high quality design. | 00:13:27 | |
| The waiver of the size of the requirement is consistent with supporting the entrepreneurship. | 00:13:32 | |
| As it retains its supply of small-scale commercial buildings. | 00:13:37 | |
| The comprehensive plan encourages working with other infrastructure providers. | 00:13:41 | |
| Such as in dot and Floyd County to provide safe pedestrian crossing. | 00:13:46 | |
| Which would be necessary for that location. | 00:13:50 | |
| A waiver is consistent with the intent of the district because the variances are modifying the Dist. | 00:13:53 | |
| The design elements to fit the unique circumstances of the pro. | 00:13:59 | |
| Properties close proximity to the intersection. | 00:14:04 | |
| Old Vincennes Rd. | 00:14:07 | |
| Delphi Rd. Highlander Point Drive and US150. | 00:14:09 | |
| The proposed development. | 00:14:13 | |
| Is consistent with the comprehensive plan because the site is located within the Highlander Point commercial corridor. | 00:14:15 | |
| IE at places. | 00:14:23 | |
| It places to Foster and facilitate. | 00:14:24 | |
| Entrepreneurial opportunities in the objectives and policies. | 00:14:27 | |
| Small commercial buildings cater to small entrepreneurial efforts. | 00:14:31 | |
| And increases the limited stock of small space available in the community. | 00:14:36 | |
| #4. | 00:14:41 | |
| The proposed development plan is consistent with the intent of the district. | 00:14:42 | |
| Is set forth in the Floyd County zoning ordinance because as a part of the Highlander point. | 00:14:47 | |
| Overlay district the site. | 00:14:53 | |
| Sits in an intended premier commercial and office location. | 00:14:55 | |
| #5 The proposed development plan does satisfy. | 00:15:00 | |
| The following development requirements. | 00:15:05 | |
| It does satisfy the signage designed to create unified consistent sign package. | 00:15:09 | |
| It does. | 00:15:15 | |
| Does approve the design and location of the street access points to minimize congestion? | 00:15:17 | |
| The entrances, streets and internal traffic facilities are compatible with existing planned streets and adjacent developments. | 00:15:25 | |
| And the design and layout of the development has a clear circulation pattern. | 00:15:32 | |
| That is sensitive to the topography and other natural features. | 00:15:37 | |
| Skipping down. | 00:15:43 | |
| Did not apply to E but F. | 00:15:45 | |
| The lighting is designed to create unified and consistent lighting package for the development. | 00:15:48 | |
| Ng lighting in parking areas does not exceed 20. | 00:15:53 | |
| Feet in height. | 00:15:57 | |
| 6 The proposed development is not in a residential urban. | 00:15:59 | |
| The proposed development is not multi family development. | 00:16:03 | |
| And if the proposed development is located in a residential urban. | 00:16:07 | |
| District of a multi family development is proposed. A development plan does satisfy the requirements for recreational space and | 00:16:11 | |
| open space. | 00:16:15 | |
| The proposed development is located in Highlander Point District. | 00:16:21 | |
| Or the Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:16:25 | |
| And if the proposed development is located in the Highlander Point Gateway District or the Edwardsville? | 00:16:28 | |
| District. The following requirements have been met. | 00:16:34 | |
| The building. | 00:16:37 | |
| That face any adjustments? | 00:16:40 | |
| The adjacent St. have. | 00:16:42 | |
| The finished. | 00:16:45 | |
| Facade. | 00:16:47 | |
| And. | 00:16:48 | |
| B&C don't apply. | 00:16:51 | |
| D Open space requirements of section 94. | 00:16:53 | |
| We've had some late. | 00:16:59 | |
| Yes, I'm B. | 00:17:00 | |
| We had some late changes on trash collection bins. | 00:17:02 | |
| So make sure they're not placed on or along the. | 00:17:06 | |
| Facade The face is any adjacent St. | 00:17:09 | |
| Thank you. | 00:17:13 | |
| So if I'm careful, review Floyd County Commission hereby approves. | 00:17:15 | |
| Petitioners development plan. | 00:17:19 | |
| Review application at the meeting held on 13th day of April. | 00:17:21 | |
| 2026 need to add that condition. | 00:17:25 | |
| What about trees? | 00:17:29 | |
| Alright, we we, we have. | 00:17:33 | |
| A ballot. | 00:17:35 | |
| Looking for a second. | 00:17:36 | |
| I will second it. | 00:17:38 | |
| All right. Any discussion? | 00:17:39 | |
| The condition of the plants is where this needs to go in at. | 00:17:42 | |
| So that they just talk to me and I'm happy to work with them on a. | 00:17:45 | |
| More efficient landscape plan, OK. | 00:17:48 | |
| Tell us how you need that written up, please. How you doing? Landscaping as approved by staff. That's what I Yeah. And the staff | 00:17:52 | |
| landscaping thing was approved by staff. | 00:17:56 | |
| Yeah, yeah, Yeah. You guys are working. Yeah, well. | 00:17:59 | |
| We're gonna give him time to add that to the ballot. | 00:18:04 | |
| We'll read the condition and then. | 00:18:07 | |
| I'll need a second on the condition. | 00:18:11 | |
| Azeroth. | 00:18:14 | |
| OK, I added on. | 00:18:22 | |
| 7. | 00:18:27 | |
| E Landscaping as approved by staff. | 00:18:28 | |
| That's my ballot. | 00:18:32 | |
| All right, so we got ballot visit. We need a second as amended. | 00:18:34 | |
| Any other discussion? | 00:18:38 | |
| All in favor. OK, OK. | 00:18:40 | |
| The staff had three recommendations. | 00:18:43 | |
| The last one talked about sections 5.5155. | 00:18:46 | |
| .52 Have all those been met? | 00:18:50 | |
| With the plans that we have, or does that need to be a? | 00:18:53 | |
| I apologize because I didn't add clarifying language in that that those are the sidewalk recommendations for the sections that. | 00:18:59 | |
| Require sidewalks that has been met. | 00:19:04 | |
| OK, it's OK. | 00:19:08 | |
| All right, so we're good with as read. | 00:19:09 | |
| And second it as read. | 00:19:12 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 00:19:15 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:19:18 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. | 00:19:20 | |
| All righty. | 00:19:22 | |
| Next is and ask the applicant. | 00:19:24 | |
| Yes, it's OK to put. | 00:19:27 | |
| Agenda item two and three together if you come forward and. | 00:19:30 | |
| State your name. | 00:19:33 | |
| And your address and tell us if you're OK. | 00:19:35 | |
| Sir Brad Benson, attorney on behalf of Spring Hill Holdings, located at 720 Rolling Creek Dr. Ste. 106 in Walton, IN. | 00:19:37 | |
| And yes, we have no objection to reading them both together. OK, thank you very much. | 00:19:45 | |
| All righty, at this time we're going to. | 00:19:49 | |
| And Frank, I want to make sure that. | 00:19:54 | |
| The. | 00:19:56 | |
| FC-03-26 this says 15. That's supposed to be 16. Is that correct? | 00:19:57 | |
| That's correct. | 00:20:03 | |
| OK. All right. So agenda item number 2 is Docket FC-03-206-16. | 00:20:05 | |
| Modification. Modification of subdivision standards. | 00:20:15 | |
| Applicant is requesting A modification for the Subdivision Control Ordinance requirement for a maximum 10% grade for public | 00:20:18 | |
| roadways. | 00:20:21 | |
| Previous approval. | 00:20:25 | |
| From 2021 has expired. The full subdivision proposal is covered. | 00:20:26 | |
| Under agenda Agenda item. | 00:20:31 | |
| #3. | 00:20:33 | |
| Applicant Spring Hill Holding, LLC. | 00:20:34 | |
| Site 78. | 00:20:37 | |
| 12 Excuse Me 2778 W Luther Rd. Floyd Knobs. | 00:20:39 | |
| Indiana 47119. | 00:20:44 | |
| It's yours. | 00:20:47 | |
| Let me read 3 OK? | 00:20:49 | |
| I'll go ahead and read agenda item number 3. | 00:20:51 | |
| Docket FC-03 Dash. | 00:20:54 | |
| 26-17. | 00:20:57 | |
| Primary approval for a major subdivision. | 00:20:59 | |
| Applicant is seeking. | 00:21:02 | |
| Primary approval for a subdivision to be known as Spring Hill. | 00:21:03 | |
| The proposal. | 00:21:06 | |
| Preliminary, not primary. Oh, I'm sorry. | 00:21:08 | |
| Let me applicant is seeking. | 00:21:11 | |
| Primary. | 00:21:14 | |
| Primary approval for a subdivision to be known as Spring Hill. | 00:21:16 | |
| The the proposal will. | 00:21:19 | |
| Consolidate 2 parcels totaling. | 00:21:20 | |
| 46 point. | 00:21:23 | |
| 317 acres into 72 lots. | 00:21:25 | |
| With three commonaries and a gross density of 1.64. | 00:21:28 | |
| Previous approval from 2021 has expired. | 00:21:32 | |
| Applicants Spring Hill Holdings LLC Site. | 00:21:35 | |
| 2778 W Luther Rd. Floyd Knobs. | 00:21:39 | |
| 47119. | 00:21:43 | |
| Now take it, Frank. | 00:21:45 | |
| Alright. | 00:21:48 | |
| Docket number FC 3/26/16. | 00:21:50 | |
| Petitioners Spring Hill Holdings, LLC, represented by Jason Copperway. | 00:21:53 | |
| President location, 2777 N Luther Rd. Floyds and Hobbs, consisting of two different parcels. | 00:21:57 | |
| Requests for a modification of subdivision control ordinance requirements for major subdivision for Spring Hill. | 00:22:05 | |
| Zoning district is residential suburban. | 00:22:11 | |
| Article 4, Section 3. Item R requires a maximum grade of 10%. | 00:22:14 | |
| For subdivision streets. | 00:22:19 | |
| Applicant is requesting a modification of the subdivision control ordinances to allow an excess of the 10% grade requirement. | 00:22:20 | |
| For subdivision streets and is proposing a 14% grade for one St. of the Spring Hill development being heard next. | 00:22:26 | |
| The modification was previously approved in 2021, allowing a 14% grade, but that approval has since expired. | 00:22:33 | |
| A hill sits on the northern portion of the property and we would need to be heavily graded to meet the 10% slope requirement. | 00:22:40 | |
| Thelma Way is proposed along this hill and would connect to seven lots #26 through 32. | 00:22:47 | |
| Sitting on that hill. | 00:22:53 | |
| The proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to serve letters from the local public services and has received a letter of | 00:22:54 | |
| intent from the Floyd County Fire Territory. | 00:22:58 | |
| For the staff review. | 00:23:03 | |
| The modification will not be detrimental to the public's health, safety or general welfare. | 00:23:04 | |
| The modification will not have a significant impact to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. The Fire Territory has | 00:23:08 | |
| expressed an intent to serve. | 00:23:11 | |
| The modification will not adversely affect adjacent property. | 00:23:15 | |
| The grade of this roadway is used solely for access to these settlements. | 00:23:19 | |
| The modification is justified because of exceptional topography or other physical conditions unique to the property involved and | 00:23:22 | |
| is not to correct. | 00:23:26 | |
| Mere inconvenience or financial disadvantage? | 00:23:29 | |
| The modification is justified by the unique conditions of a large hill present on the site. | 00:23:32 | |
| And to otherwise develop this location would drastically change the shape of the terrain. | 00:23:36 | |
| For, the conditions upon which the modification request is based are unique to the property. | 00:23:41 | |
| For which the relief is sought and not applicable generally to other property. | 00:23:46 | |
| This property has a large hill present that adds to the scenery of the site. | 00:23:50 | |
| #5 The modification is consistent with the intent and purpose of this ordinance and the Comprehensive plan. | 00:23:53 | |
| The comprehensive plan encourages preserving natural and rural characteristics in the community. | 00:23:59 | |
| This modification allows the subdivision to retain a unique feature that would otherwise have to be removed for development to | 00:24:04 | |
| occur. | 00:24:07 | |
| Number six. | 00:24:11 | |
| The condition necessary. | 00:24:12 | |
| Necessitating the modification was not created by the owner or the applicant. | 00:24:13 | |
| This hills re existing. | 00:24:17 | |
| #7 The relief sought will not in any way vary the provisions of the zoning ordinance. | 00:24:19 | |
| The approval is consistent with the provisions and the zoning. | 00:24:23 | |
| For staff recommendations. | 00:24:26 | |
| Whereas the fire department has submitted an intent to serve letter, the street is to connect to seven locks rather than be used | 00:24:27 | |
| as a throughway. | 00:24:30 | |
| And this will not negatively impact the surrounding properties staff has no. | 00:24:34 | |
| Recommended conditions for approval of this. | 00:24:37 | |
| Modification. | 00:24:39 | |
| Docket FC 3/26/17. | 00:24:45 | |
| Petitioner Spring Hill Holdings, LLC, represented by Jason Copper Weight and Brad Benson. | 00:24:48 | |
| Location, 2777 N Luther Rd. Floyd's Knobs along two different parcels. | 00:24:52 | |
| Request for a major subdivision. | 00:24:58 | |
| Primary approval for a major subdivision on Spring Hill. | 00:25:00 | |
| Zoning district is residential suburban. | 00:25:04 | |
| The petitioner is seeking preliminary approval. | 00:25:09 | |
| Of a subdivision to be known as Spring Hill. | 00:25:11 | |
| The proposal will consolidate 2 parcels totaling 46.317 acres and is 71 lots with three common areas and a gross density of 1.64. | 00:25:13 | |
| Internal roadway acreage not excluded. | 00:25:22 | |
| The common areas contain a total of 3.469 acres and are primarily located near the entrance and in the back of the property over a | 00:25:25 | |
| Creek. | 00:25:28 | |
| The property is located within the northeastern portion of the residential growth area of the Georgetown Township and falling | 00:25:33 | |
| partially within the Highlander Point Overlay District. | 00:25:37 | |
| To the east, within the Lafayette Township, the land is designated as a residential and commercial growth area. | 00:25:42 | |
| This land is designated as growth areas due to their proximity to utilities, Hwy. 64 and existing amenities. | 00:25:47 | |
| Since shops, schools and other institutions. | 00:25:53 | |
| With an intent to focus development here rather than areas that the plant has designated as transitional or agricultural areas. | 00:25:56 | |
| This site is accessed through. | 00:26:03 | |
| Sorry is accessed through a connection to North Luther Road to the West and a connection to the platted subdivisions of the | 00:26:05 | |
| Highlands and villas of Floyd's Knobs. | 00:26:09 | |
| Both of which connect to Ulvenson's road. | 00:26:13 | |
| Where the Highlands has a fully signalized intersection. | 00:26:15 | |
| All Vincents connects to Hwy. 150 roughly 1000 feet from this intersection and is then a short distance from Hwy. 164. | 00:26:19 | |
| The proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to serve letters from the local public services and was included with the | 00:26:27 | |
| regional traffic study that the county did. | 00:26:30 | |
| Adjoining properties to the northwest, W South and southeast are the Prifoguel, Loftus, and Fincher's Farms, all zoned residential | 00:26:35 | |
| suburban. | 00:26:38 | |
| To the east are two platted subdivisions, zoned urban residential. | 00:26:43 | |
| The Highlands and the villas of Floyd's Knobs. | 00:26:47 | |
| To the north is wooded land, zoned residential suburban. | 00:26:49 | |
| A plat review was held on April 1st and while not required, a neighborhood meeting with staff. | 00:26:52 | |
| And the applicant present occurred March 26. | 00:26:57 | |
| For staff review, the petitioner has provided a. | 00:27:03 | |
| Sorry, the petitioner has. | 00:27:07 | |
| Provided A compliant preliminary plan for the project, including a preliminary plat. | 00:27:09 | |
| The petitioner has provided certification that all drainage and environmental requirements will be complied with and that there | 00:27:14 | |
| are no known outstanding issues concerning item. | 00:27:18 | |
| This is page 15 of the application that was submitted. | 00:27:22 | |
| Minor areas of the property exceed a 20% ground slope, are located within a floodplain, or are designated as wetlands. | 00:27:25 | |
| However, given that no homes will be built in these areas. | 00:27:31 | |
| The site will be serviced by sewers and no ground disturbing activities will occur in those areas. | 00:27:34 | |
| A geotechnical report would not be required. | 00:27:39 | |
| A letter from IDEM indicating that no permit was required from IDEM for the wetlands present. | 00:27:41 | |
| A phase one environmental study is not required. | 00:27:47 | |
| A regional traffic study was completed by the county and the traffic light installation along Old Vincennes has been installed at | 00:27:49 | |
| this time. | 00:27:52 | |
| Accepting cul-de-sac lots. | 00:27:56 | |
| Locksmith the size and frontage standards of the Floyd County zoning ordinance for the residential suburban. | 00:27:58 | |
| District and are laid out along subdivision streets compliant with. | 00:28:02 | |
| Subdivision control standards. | 00:28:06 | |
| Springhill Drive, Merrill Drive, Guy Drive and Thumbnaway are provided as subdivision streets, which connect to North Luther Road | 00:28:09 | |
| to the West and Old Benson Rd. via the Highlands Plighted Subdivision to the east. | 00:28:14 | |
| Sidewalks are provided. | 00:28:19 | |
| Drainage plans were approved in 2023 with Floyd Sorry with FC2308148 by the Stormwater director. | 00:28:21 | |
| The petitioner has provided willingness to serve letters from AT&T, Spectrum, Edwardsville Water Authority, Harrison RMC and Floyd | 00:28:28 | |
| County Fire Authority. | 00:28:32 | |
| Wastewater will be provided by New Albany Wastewater. | 00:28:36 | |
| This subdivision received primary approval in 2021. | 00:28:41 | |
| And has been altered for this submission. | 00:28:44 | |
| Lots around Common Area B have been shortened to dedicate more room for the pond. | 00:28:46 | |
| That will also serve as a detention basin. | 00:28:51 | |
| Additionally, there's a reduction from 76 single family lots to 71 single family. | 00:28:53 | |
| Lots the conditions from that original approval. | 00:28:57 | |
| Conditions for the initial submittal of the primary application. | 00:29:02 | |
| One, a maximum grade of 14% is approved for the street leading to lots 2733, approximately 400 feet, known as Thelma Lane, per FC | 00:29:06 | |
| 6/21/16. | 00:29:10 | |
| This was met with the current proposal. | 00:29:15 | |
| Item 2. | 00:29:18 | |
| Applicant to provide required agricultural buffer per subdivision control ordinance for Fintris, Pifoglo, and Church properties. | 00:29:19 | |
| A 20 foot ag buffer is being provided along these properties and was shown in the plan. | 00:29:25 | |
| Item 3 or condition 3. | 00:29:30 | |
| Applicant to present drainage plan to Floyd County Stormwater Board for review and approval prior to secondary approval. Staff | 00:29:32 | |
| recommends to. | 00:29:36 | |
| The Floyd County Stormwater Board at least a minimum 10% increase in stormwater detention from ordinance standards and would | 00:29:40 | |
| request considerations of 25% increase in detention. | 00:29:44 | |
| Also request coordination with the Highlands on detention in South corner of the development. | 00:29:48 | |
| Letter to be obtained from the Floyd County Stormwater Board regarding their actions on recommendations prior to secondary | 00:29:53 | |
| approval. | 00:29:56 | |
| The stormwater plan has already received. | 00:29:59 | |
| Approval from the stormwater director. | 00:30:01 | |
| Condition 4 applicants to meet with the County Engineer for recommendation. | 00:30:04 | |
| Regarding sizing of culvert on Fincher's access ease easement. | 00:30:07 | |
| Engineer to determine if an increase in size is required as part of overall drainage plan presented by developer. | 00:30:10 | |
| If determination is made for increase in size, applicants pay for installation of the culvert for county engineers recommendations | 00:30:17 | |
| prior to secondary approval. | 00:30:20 | |
| The applicant reports that drainage calculations so the existing culvert as adequate. | 00:30:24 | |
| Item 5. Applicant to meet with County Engineer regarding entrance location. Engineer to provide letter upon location | 00:30:30 | |
| recommendation and site improvement prior to secondary approval. | 00:30:34 | |
| This has been met and there's a letter in the docket. | 00:30:39 | |
| Item or condition 6. | 00:30:41 | |
| Applicant to identify access easement with Pinterest property and restrictions and provide language stating that. | 00:30:42 | |
| Access amusement is for Fentress property, ingress and egress, HOA and utility access. | 00:30:47 | |
| And that the access easement shall be a common area. | 00:30:52 | |
| This is not been met. The easement is not shown as an access easement. | 00:30:54 | |
| And I don't believe language is currently in the HOA covenants. | 00:30:58 | |
| Applicant to meet with the County Extension agent on allowable types of trees for installation. | 00:31:03 | |
| We have something where the applicant did meet with the county extension agent. | 00:31:09 | |
| For staff recommendations where residents should be aware of the location of the venturous access easement where modification is | 00:31:13 | |
| needed for the road grade on proposed Delmar Lane. | 00:31:17 | |
| Where alterations have been made to the plan since the stormwater approval was given. | 00:31:21 | |
| And where the comprehensive Plan encourages protecting the rural character of the community and where prior conditions are found | 00:31:24 | |
| to be satisfied or not applicable. | 00:31:28 | |
| Staff recommends the following conditions. | 00:31:31 | |
| Show location of the Fentress easement on plat before final plat approval. | 00:31:34 | |
| A maximum grade of 14% is approved for the street leading to lots 27 to 33, approximately 400 feet, known as Selma Lane, per FC | 00:31:39 | |
| 3/26/16. | 00:31:43 | |
| Drainage, stormwater and erosion control plans must be updated and submitted to the Stormwater Department for review and approval | 00:31:48 | |
| given by the. | 00:31:51 | |
| Department prior to final. | 00:31:54 | |
| By that department prior to final. | 00:31:56 | |
| Plat approval. | 00:31:57 | |
| And add to HOA covenants either a recommendation or requirement to utilize the most up-to-date. | 00:31:59 | |
| Indiana Department of Natural Resources tree species list for any tree plantings. | 00:32:03 | |
| That's all I have. | 00:32:10 | |
| All right. Excuse me. | 00:32:14 | |
| Any questions for? | 00:32:16 | |
| Frank from the board. | 00:32:17 | |
| Go ahead. I want to just clarify. | 00:32:20 | |
| The. | 00:32:24 | |
| Previous staff recommendations that you read. | 00:32:26 | |
| Correct. | 00:32:29 | |
| They most of these have already been met other than the ones. | 00:32:31 | |
| You have now recommended. Is that correct? | 00:32:35 | |
| Correct. OK. All right. | 00:32:37 | |
| Thank you. | 00:32:39 | |
| Yeah, I'm talking about what what I'm saying is, is. | 00:32:43 | |
| The ones he just read from the previous. | 00:32:45 | |
| Those have all been met. If they're not. | 00:32:48 | |
| On his. | 00:32:51 | |
| Recommendation now. | 00:32:51 | |
| Yeah. | 00:32:52 | |
| Or I did not find that they needed to be added. | 00:32:53 | |
| Right, right. | 00:32:55 | |
| Applicable. Any other questions for Frank anybody? | 00:32:57 | |
| Alright, thanks for all right, the applicant can can now. | 00:33:01 | |
| Come forward, please. | 00:33:05 | |
| And once again, state your name and address for the record for us. | 00:33:06 | |
| Thank you. | 00:33:09 | |
| Excuse me, Brad Benson, Spring Hole, Spring Hill Holdings, 720 Rolling Creek Dr. Ste. 106, Norman, IN. | 00:33:12 | |
| Stats does a great job going through everything. A couple things want to address really. | 00:33:19 | |
| Very quickly it is 71 lots. | 00:33:23 | |
| Those range from here under .3 acres all the way up to. | 00:33:25 | |
| Roughly 2.8 acres, so we've got a wide variety of lots here. | 00:33:29 | |
| The drainage and the change that we made on the pond was because when we got through it, we started looking at it and. | 00:33:34 | |
| The ponds a beautiful feature that we wanted to keep. | 00:33:39 | |
| So that's the change there that it. | 00:33:42 | |
| Is honestly, it's going to hurt. | 00:33:44 | |
| The development side as far as financial associate has nothing to do with money. It's solely for aesthetics. | 00:33:45 | |
| And it'll capture more on the stormwater side, too. | 00:33:50 | |
| So it's a, it's a double, double edged sword there for us. | 00:33:53 | |
| The staff recommendations that they discussed we've got no problems with at all. | 00:33:57 | |
| There was a number of things. | 00:34:03 | |
| Well, I guess I should back up the staff recommendations for the. | 00:34:04 | |
| Plat approval. | 00:34:07 | |
| Which reference the access easement. | 00:34:09 | |
| Agreed completely that excess season should have been included. | 00:34:11 | |
| Jason added that. | 00:34:14 | |
| To the plat and sent that to staff on Friday. I don't know if that made it to your own packet or not, but it has already been | 00:34:16 | |
| added. | 00:34:19 | |
| So we've got no condition to or no problem with that, keeping that as a condition. | 00:34:22 | |
| As far as? | 00:34:26 | |
| What was previously approved? | 00:34:27 | |
| One of the conditions was that the access easement. | 00:34:29 | |
| Be part of common area. | 00:34:32 | |
| When we met with the neighbor in Mr. Fentress, I do not believe that that should be common area solely because his worry, one of | 00:34:34 | |
| his worries is that. | 00:34:38 | |
| People will access it and be I have. | 00:34:42 | |
| Be able to get to that. | 00:34:44 | |
| That part. | 00:34:45 | |
| If it is common area. | 00:34:46 | |
| By law, it'll be owned by the HOA and then every single member in that development. | 00:34:48 | |
| Will have a right to. | 00:34:52 | |
| Get on that property. We don't want that. | 00:34:53 | |
| I agree with the condition and. | 00:34:56 | |
| It's all staff we have no problem with including in our restrictions. | 00:34:58 | |
| That the there is an access easement identifying. | 00:35:01 | |
| That they cannot hinder or limit his use of it, as explained that Mister Fincher as well. | 00:35:05 | |
| And then that one of his concerns was that there was vehicles. | 00:35:11 | |
| Trucks, semis, I think Duke vehicles would come access that to get to their electric there. | 00:35:15 | |
| So we have no problem with including that and our restrictions as well, just as a FYI to homeowners, right? | 00:35:20 | |
| So that's the the couple things and the conditions. I just want to clarify that that. | 00:35:26 | |
| We do not believe and it should not be a common area. | 00:35:30 | |
| Because of those those justifications, those reasons why so? | 00:35:33 | |
| All right. Any, any questions for Brad? | 00:35:37 | |
| Umm, no I do not. | 00:35:42 | |
| Jason, you gonna speak? | 00:35:45 | |
| Obviously, you have answered questions, OK. | 00:35:46 | |
| But I just want to be sure Frank, what he just. | 00:35:48 | |
| Mentioned. | 00:35:50 | |
| As far as even have a problem with it. | 00:35:51 | |
| Is it? | 00:35:53 | |
| On your recommendations, what he just. | 00:35:54 | |
| It is it per what he just said. | 00:35:56 | |
| I just want to make sure we've captured. | 00:35:59 | |
| That's correct. I did not include a recommendation for this to be as a common area for. | 00:36:01 | |
| Pretty much the reason he gave. | 00:36:06 | |
| OK, but you're agreeing what he said and it matches your recommendation? | 00:36:08 | |
| Yes, OK. | 00:36:11 | |
| Alright, thank you. | 00:36:12 | |
| Have a question? All right, Frank's got a question. | 00:36:14 | |
| Umm, high view circle? | 00:36:18 | |
| Is that going into another subdivision on the other side? | 00:36:21 | |
| Next into the Highlands. | 00:36:25 | |
| OK. | 00:36:26 | |
| OK, All right. I think that. | 00:36:32 | |
| I think we're OK. Listen, any other questions? | 00:36:34 | |
| I think we're under 10 minutes, right or whatever here. | 00:36:37 | |
| Yeah, I'm just curious what, what are the home prices when you start? | 00:36:40 | |
| I'm just curious. | 00:36:44 | |
| What are the home prices? | 00:36:46 | |
| I'd be lying if I gave you a number. | 00:36:48 | |
| But it's relatively speculative, but I mean, we, we anticipate this development being one of the nicer ones in the area we've | 00:36:50 | |
| given the location. | 00:36:54 | |
| The layout, the size of the lots. | 00:36:59 | |
| If I had to throw a number at it a year north of 400. | 00:37:02 | |
| I don't see it. I don't I highly, highly doubt it be underneath that and it's probably higher above that. So. | 00:37:06 | |
| ASBS to be the building. | 00:37:13 | |
| ASB and Shuler homes at this time I don't want to include that directly. Never know what happened though. Yes Sir. | 00:37:15 | |
| It sounds like a political answer. | 00:37:20 | |
| Channel 4, all right. | 00:37:25 | |
| No other questions. | 00:37:28 | |
| Alright, thanks guys. We'll give you time to come back up if anything, they said. | 00:37:29 | |
| OK. At this time, we'll open up the portion. | 00:37:33 | |
| Anybody wants to speak in favor of this project? | 00:37:35 | |
| You have 10 minutes. Please come forward. | 00:37:38 | |
| And this is in favor only please. | 00:37:43 | |
| State your name and address for the record, Sir. | 00:37:47 | |
| My name is Bill Amerson. | 00:37:50 | |
| 339 Tuscany Dr. Floyds Knobs IN 47119. | 00:37:52 | |
| I probably have more questions that I have. | 00:38:01 | |
| Positive comments. | 00:38:03 | |
| But I'm speaking for it I. | 00:38:05 | |
| What I know about ASB and Schuler they. | 00:38:08 | |
| Build quality homes. | 00:38:11 | |
| And. | 00:38:12 | |
| That's what we're looking, that's what I'm looking for. That's. | 00:38:14 | |
| Adjacent to the villas of Floyd's Knobs. | 00:38:18 | |
| Don't know all that, I'll talk to him later, get some more answers. | 00:38:23 | |
| But. | 00:38:27 | |
| Pleased with the estimated price of the homes. | 00:38:29 | |
| I figured they would be north of 400 because some of the lots are pretty large and. | 00:38:32 | |
| Figure you're not gonna. | 00:38:37 | |
| But an inexplicit house on. | 00:38:38 | |
| On a large lot. | 00:38:43 | |
| So. | 00:38:44 | |
| Trees. I've got a question about the trees. I hope that. | 00:38:47 | |
| Whatever trees are planted wouldn't be any of the Bradford pear, Calgary pear. | 00:38:51 | |
| I would hope the county has not taken any action on that or not, but we need to take action on that if. | 00:38:56 | |
| There's not. | 00:39:01 | |
| So anyway. | 00:39:02 | |
| But I support the project. | 00:39:05 | |
| Thanks, Bill. | 00:39:07 | |
| All right. | 00:39:08 | |
| Thank you, Bill. | 00:39:11 | |
| Anybody else in favor Prince? | 00:39:13 | |
| All right, at this time we'll close that portion and we'll open up anybody who wants to speak in opposition. | 00:39:17 | |
| And once again, total time would be 10 minutes. Thank you. | 00:39:22 | |
| Tim Fentress. | 00:39:30 | |
| Property owner, 2740 N Luther Rd. | 00:39:31 | |
| I am asking the board if I could have a few extra minutes. | 00:39:36 | |
| Sometimes I get slow in my talk. I get tongue tied. | 00:39:40 | |
| I'm sorry for that, but. | 00:39:44 | |
| I have some important things here that I need to cover. | 00:39:46 | |
| I'll try to be as brief as possible. Could I have a few extra minutes? | 00:39:48 | |
| Go ahead, We'll see what happens. I appreciate it so much. Thank you so much. | 00:39:52 | |
| I have spent more time on this. | 00:39:56 | |
| Property in this farm that anybody on this planet. | 00:39:58 | |
| Worked hard on it all my life. | 00:40:02 | |
| I'm wondering about the hill in the grade. I hadn't been thinking about that lately. | 00:40:04 | |
| But. | 00:40:08 | |
| We like them. Paris is out on that hill. | 00:40:10 | |
| 60 years ago. | 00:40:13 | |
| And they work. | 00:40:15 | |
| The grade of that hill I'm concerned about. I don't know how much you're going to cut it down. | 00:40:17 | |
| To get up there but. | 00:40:21 | |
| There is something that nearly needs to be looked at. | 00:40:22 | |
| Now 3 years ago we was here. | 00:40:26 | |
| County Engineer. | 00:40:29 | |
| You said that. | 00:40:31 | |
| The. | 00:40:33 | |
| That my son's on the driveway. | 00:40:35 | |
| That call has been. | 00:40:39 | |
| Ever since we put it there, it was supposed to be an upgraded for years. | 00:40:42 | |
| And it was not. | 00:40:46 | |
| And since. | 00:40:47 | |
| Last three years. | 00:40:48 | |
| How many developments have been approved? | 00:40:49 | |
| In the Hollander Point. | 00:40:52 | |
| Down through the Highlands. I will say this, you stood on top of the Highlands and put good. | 00:40:54 | |
| Controller. | 00:40:59 | |
| On that. | 00:41:00 | |
| But we're sitting here, wait, holding our breath, The only persons. | 00:41:02 | |
| Then it affects if my son. | 00:41:06 | |
| And I'm speaking for my son. | 00:41:08 | |
| My granddaughter who lives back there, they're the only ones living on the whole farm right now. | 00:41:11 | |
| We lost that driveway three times in the 80s and 90s. | 00:41:15 | |
| I called years ago. | 00:41:19 | |
| For a precast. | 00:41:22 | |
| Bridge there. | 00:41:23 | |
| To take care of the problem. | 00:41:25 | |
| With all the increase in flow. | 00:41:27 | |
| All the drainage plants from up. | 00:41:29 | |
| It's a Honda Point. | 00:41:31 | |
| Point. | 00:41:33 | |
| And empty into that spot right there through our 4 foot tile under that driveway. | 00:41:34 | |
| Now I realize the driveway belongs to the developer. | 00:41:39 | |
| But I want some guarantees there. | 00:41:43 | |
| That. | 00:41:46 | |
| This the county engineer, he's going to fill a report, right? | 00:41:47 | |
| He hasn't done it. I spoke to him Thursday. | 00:41:51 | |
| After three years, I don't know why it hasn't been done. | 00:41:54 | |
| But. | 00:41:57 | |
| My sons, both my sons own the property in the back we want to see. | 00:41:58 | |
| A bigger right there, uh, tile. | 00:42:04 | |
| Pre cash bridge would be perfect. | 00:42:06 | |
| Uh, you got them all over the county, the one. | 00:42:09 | |
| It's got my attention is that. | 00:42:11 | |
| Right there on 150 at Buck Creek Rd. | 00:42:14 | |
| I've measured it. | 00:42:16 | |
| It looks. | 00:42:18 | |
| Like it should be the right one there. | 00:42:19 | |
| Now. | 00:42:22 | |
| The driveway. | 00:42:23 | |
| I built that driveway. I paid for it. | 00:42:24 | |
| I spent a lot of money on that driveway through the years. The lower end of it there at Luther Rd. you see, is in the floods | 00:42:28 | |
| wrench. | 00:42:31 | |
| And it will get underwater in A5. | 00:42:35 | |
| And. | 00:42:39 | |
| I have a real problem also with that turning lane. | 00:42:41 | |
| That turning lane should have been taken care of years ago. It was originally set up. | 00:42:44 | |
| With a 30 foot driveway. | 00:42:48 | |
| To be an entrance. | 00:42:49 | |
| Into the development my dad did that and when he did it he also put the property line on the South side of the driveway, which has | 00:42:51 | |
| caused trouble. | 00:42:56 | |
| You just don't do things like that. | 00:43:02 | |
| Now I need to ask. | 00:43:04 | |
| About the This will be a homeowners. | 00:43:06 | |
| Association in this development, correct? | 00:43:10 | |
| I mean that it. | 00:43:13 | |
| The question is. | 00:43:15 | |
| A homeowners association will control. | 00:43:16 | |
| That now being as the property lines go across the driveway. | 00:43:20 | |
| Will that driveway itself become? | 00:43:25 | |
| Part of. | 00:43:28 | |
| The homeowners association. | 00:43:29 | |
| And will they have a say? | 00:43:31 | |
| But I think. | 00:43:33 | |
| He just answered that. | 00:43:35 | |
| That. | 00:43:36 | |
| They. | 00:43:39 | |
| Will not. | 00:43:40 | |
| The can impede what we use that driveway for. | 00:43:41 | |
| Me, my sons. | 00:43:45 | |
| The agricultural we use. | 00:43:46 | |
| All the big trucks. I have a Duke Energy. | 00:43:48 | |
| Agreement there for them to get their trucks in down on the Little Indian Creek. | 00:43:51 | |
| Big equipment. | 00:43:55 | |
| Everything else. | 00:43:56 | |
| There's that's one of my concerns right there. | 00:43:58 | |
| Now. | 00:44:00 | |
| In the first. | 00:44:01 | |
| Three years ago. | 00:44:02 | |
| Under the. | 00:44:04 | |
| It was listed as farming. | 00:44:07 | |
| Activities. | 00:44:09 | |
| My acceptance of a deed. Another transfer instrument each each lot owner. | 00:44:12 | |
| In there is advised that this development is in an agricultural residential zone. | 00:44:17 | |
| Which permits certain agricultural uses. | 00:44:22 | |
| Each lot owner by acceptance of a deed. | 00:44:24 | |
| Our other transfer instrument. | 00:44:27 | |
| Waves his or her right. | 00:44:29 | |
| To cause any problem. | 00:44:31 | |
| To me. | 00:44:33 | |
| And my son's in our agricultural operations. | 00:44:35 | |
| My son's raised a. | 00:44:38 | |
| Livestock or. | 00:44:39 | |
| Go back to raging livestock over on the other side. | 00:44:40 | |
| And. | 00:44:43 | |
| What comes into play there with that? | 00:44:44 | |
| Is the agricultural buffer. | 00:44:47 | |
| Now I. | 00:44:49 | |
| I don't ask much from Floyd County at all, but I'm asking now. | 00:44:52 | |
| I want this. | 00:44:56 | |
| They say it's not in here, but I want it. | 00:44:59 | |
| And the file. | 00:45:02 | |
| Approval. | 00:45:04 | |
| Says farming activities. | 00:45:05 | |
| This section right here. | 00:45:08 | |
| I want that. | 00:45:10 | |
| And so I don't have any problems whatsoever. | 00:45:12 | |
| Now I'm understanding. | 00:45:16 | |
| That this area on that driveway is listed as it will not be a common area. | 00:45:18 | |
| And that's what I've also wanted to ask for and they've done answered that. | 00:45:24 | |
| But. | 00:45:29 | |
| I I have two entrances into the field up there. | 00:45:32 | |
| To my field off the driveway. | 00:45:37 | |
| That's for the big equipment. | 00:45:39 | |
| And. | 00:45:41 | |
| I want to ask that. | 00:45:43 | |
| The buffer area Mr. Prop Ogles over on the north. | 00:45:46 | |
| Side and mine along. | 00:45:50 | |
| The road. | 00:45:54 | |
| I want them to be. | 00:45:55 | |
| Different than I believe what they called for. | 00:45:58 | |
| I want Cedars. | 00:46:01 | |
| Cedar's work. | 00:46:04 | |
| Cedar seedlings. | 00:46:05 | |
| I planted it myself. | 00:46:07 | |
| The man down on Duffy Rd. has just planted. | 00:46:09 | |
| I don't know how many thousand down there. | 00:46:11 | |
| And they work. | 00:46:13 | |
| I want cedar seedlings. | 00:46:15 | |
| On that buffer. | 00:46:17 | |
| It will create a wall very quickly. | 00:46:19 | |
| And alleviate any problems with drift. | 00:46:21 | |
| Fertilizer. Uh, lime. Specially lime dust. | 00:46:25 | |
| Going up that hill. | 00:46:28 | |
| This this development. | 00:46:30 | |
| Is in a situation. | 00:46:33 | |
| Like I've never seen in Floyd County. I believe that all of you will agree with that. | 00:46:35 | |
| It's the residential subdivision. | 00:46:39 | |
| Heavy, uh. | 00:46:41 | |
| Homes. Big homes. | 00:46:44 | |
| Coming right down. | 00:46:46 | |
| To the floodplain. | 00:46:48 | |
| Right down onto the driveway. | 00:46:50 | |
| And then extending across to my line. | 00:46:52 | |
| On the South side. | 00:46:55 | |
| I want it recognized that. | 00:46:57 | |
| Then it's an agricultural area. | 00:47:00 | |
| To also Mr. Loftus's and. | 00:47:02 | |
| Mr. Bishops. | 00:47:05 | |
| To the West. | 00:47:06 | |
| To be included in that. | 00:47:09 | |
| Under Farming activities. | 00:47:11 | |
| That's the way it read three years ago. | 00:47:13 | |
| And I want this to read the same way in this one. | 00:47:16 | |
| I'm told that it's not in this one. | 00:47:20 | |
| But. | 00:47:23 | |
| I wanted to read it. | 00:47:24 | |
| The same as it did three years ago in in that. | 00:47:27 | |
| Agreement there. | 00:47:31 | |
| I believe I've got everything there. | 00:47:33 | |
| I am. | 00:47:36 | |
| I need these things taken care of. | 00:47:37 | |
| I hope you read my letter. | 00:47:40 | |
| I'm sorry if I didn't write it right. | 00:47:42 | |
| It's I have a hard time writing letters. | 00:47:44 | |
| And like everybody else in public speaking. | 00:47:47 | |
| But you can see my heart in it. | 00:47:50 | |
| I've been there all my life. | 00:47:52 | |
| To see this. | 00:47:53 | |
| Who's your homestead disappear. | 00:47:54 | |
| Is extremely hard on me. | 00:47:57 | |
| I'm gonna say a personal thing here. | 00:48:00 | |
| Years ago. | 00:48:02 | |
| I asked about. | 00:48:04 | |
| People got ahead on me. | 00:48:07 | |
| I was an first. | 00:48:09 | |
| You always ask your children. | 00:48:11 | |
| First, no matter what. | 00:48:13 | |
| Unless it's a bad situation. | 00:48:14 | |
| I wasn't asked. People got ahead of me, people got upset with me because I even spoke up. | 00:48:17 | |
| I never, ever want to see that again in Floyd County. | 00:48:23 | |
| It's been tough on me here to. | 00:48:27 | |
| Stand here and speak like this. I usually don't. | 00:48:30 | |
| Do this but these things that I have mentioned. | 00:48:34 | |
| Let me look real quick here. | 00:48:39 | |
| We do want that pile taken care of. | 00:48:45 | |
| A free cash bridge would do it. | 00:48:47 | |
| My son's. | 00:48:50 | |
| Property over on the other side. | 00:48:51 | |
| It's a 20 foot. | 00:48:54 | |
| Buffer correct? | 00:48:55 | |
| 20 foot buffer. | 00:48:57 | |
| All the way the length of the farm, the width of the farm. | 00:48:59 | |
| From the church property. | 00:49:02 | |
| Download My Sons. | 00:49:04 | |
| 20 feet and all the way back. | 00:49:06 | |
| To Luther Row. | 00:49:10 | |
| I want to see that. | 00:49:11 | |
| It's important. | 00:49:13 | |
| I have friends that farm over in Illinois. | 00:49:14 | |
| And they are in the middle of things like this. | 00:49:17 | |
| Really deep. They farm 6000 acres over there and they have 3. | 00:49:20 | |
| Lawsuits. | 00:49:23 | |
| From. | 00:49:25 | |
| Homeowners association on them. | 00:49:27 | |
| I just want to make sure that that is in there. | 00:49:30 | |
| And that the homeowners association rules and laws. | 00:49:33 | |
| On that driveway. | 00:49:37 | |
| He is not detrimental to me and my sons. I I wrote that down. | 00:49:39 | |
| And we've got. | 00:49:45 | |
| That's fine, but we're out of time. You. You. | 00:49:48 | |
| You took the whole time, the 10 minutes, but I'm going to open up for somebody else to speak, OK? | 00:49:50 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Filters. | 00:49:54 | |
| I appreciate that. | 00:49:56 | |
| Thank you. | 00:49:57 | |
| All right. | 00:49:59 | |
| Anybody else like to speak in opposition? | 00:50:01 | |
| Open up the floor again for some more time. | 00:50:04 | |
| All righty, looks pretty good at this time. We asked the applicant to come back and. | 00:50:10 | |
| Try to respond to the request. | 00:50:15 | |
| Are the issues. | 00:50:18 | |
| I'm I'm. I'm going to write down what I. | 00:50:21 | |
| I'm going to read what I wrote down and see if it matches what you wrote down. | 00:50:23 | |
| He he mentioned grade. | 00:50:28 | |
| He mentioned tile under drive his sons. | 00:50:30 | |
| Uh, and ask for a bridge. A precast bridge, possibly. | 00:50:34 | |
| Driveway he built. | 00:50:38 | |
| It goes underwater. Something about a turning lane. | 00:50:39 | |
| HOA. This is under an. | 00:50:44 | |
| It's question propulsion access. | 00:50:46 | |
| Across Drive. | 00:50:50 | |
| Homeowners association question. | 00:50:52 | |
| AG buffer. | 00:50:56 | |
| Question. | 00:50:58 | |
| Second entrance for big equipment. | 00:51:00 | |
| And you'd like to have buffers. He would like to have cedar trees. | 00:51:03 | |
| And I didn't catch last with. | 00:51:06 | |
| The Loftus in some other farmer. | 00:51:08 | |
| But I missed that which that was adjacent farms, Yeah, that he was referring. OK, so that's what I wrote down. | 00:51:10 | |
| Help us out here. | 00:51:15 | |
| Yeah, on so on the hill in the grading. | 00:51:16 | |
| You know. | 00:51:19 | |
| When they graded it and. | 00:51:21 | |
| Apparently he installed terraces on the on the site which which do work, but as part of our work we're putting in curbs. | 00:51:23 | |
| Gutters. | 00:51:30 | |
| Storm sewers. | 00:51:31 | |
| Conveying that water. | 00:51:32 | |
| Subsurface to detention basins. | 00:51:33 | |
| So I think our work. | 00:51:36 | |
| And when it's finished, we'll accomplish the same thing that the terraces are accomplishing. | 00:51:38 | |
| On the tile. | 00:51:43 | |
| So every project that we do Floyd County stormwater requires us to look at all the downstream tiles. | 00:51:44 | |
| And make sure that they're adequate. | 00:51:50 | |
| In our initial review, our first review which was approved. | 00:51:52 | |
| We looked at that tile and it was adequate for the drainage that's that's going there. | 00:51:56 | |
| They're going to review the storm water again per the conditions. We'll check it again, but. | 00:52:00 | |
| I'm sure that it will be the same. | 00:52:05 | |
| But we will definitely look at it again. I don't know that the county engineer approved it separately from stormwater last time. | 00:52:08 | |
| But Stormwater did approve that as part of our calculation. | 00:52:13 | |
| The the what? What Mr. Finters talks about the turning lane. | 00:52:18 | |
| There's a little sliver of. | 00:52:22 | |
| Of property that. | 00:52:23 | |
| Goes S that was included in this piece. | 00:52:25 | |
| We're showing most of that being dedicated as right of way. | 00:52:27 | |
| There is a little 10 foot sliver that right now we're showing is a lot but. | 00:52:30 | |
| I know the developer was going to was going to look at that in the future and see. | 00:52:34 | |
| What could be done about that? | 00:52:37 | |
| There is an HOA required. | 00:52:40 | |
| That Mister Fentress has an easement that cannot block the driveway. | 00:52:42 | |
| We are also going to use that driveway we have to install a lift station for. | 00:52:46 | |
| Super service, we're going to use that driveway to access that lift station as well. | 00:52:50 | |
| But. | 00:52:54 | |
| And that's what Mr. Benson was talking about earlier. | 00:52:55 | |
| The previous approval condition was to dedicate that as common area. | 00:52:58 | |
| That creates a whole another set of issues for Mr. Fentress. | 00:53:02 | |
| So we are proposing that the lots would own. | 00:53:05 | |
| The land under the easement. | 00:53:08 | |
| But the easement stays in place. | 00:53:10 | |
| No one can take that away from Mr. Fentress unless he agrees to that. | 00:53:11 | |
| That will be planted, it's of record now. It will be planted and carried forward. | 00:53:16 | |
| I'm gonna I'm gonna skip to the ag buffer. | 00:53:23 | |
| So your AG buffer. | 00:53:25 | |
| It's a negative planting. | 00:53:26 | |
| Buffer. It requires no toxic type plants to be planted. | 00:53:29 | |
| To protect humans and livestocks from eating them. | 00:53:33 | |
| And and being killed. There is no requirement for any plantings. | 00:53:35 | |
| Under your AG buffer. | 00:53:39 | |
| Requirements. | 00:53:41 | |
| And then I think. | 00:53:43 | |
| I don't know for sure what document I'm assuming he was talking about. | 00:53:45 | |
| What I call probably the last person in the world. | 00:53:48 | |
| What I call a Roscoe Emily Claus. | 00:53:51 | |
| Which is notifying the anyone that buys a lot in there. | 00:53:53 | |
| That they're in an agricultural area and there might be. | 00:53:56 | |
| Noxious activities that happen, smells and whatever. | 00:53:59 | |
| I we haven't talked about that. | 00:54:02 | |
| It's probably not in the current covenant. It's it's not in the current covenants. And I can say if that's something that this | 00:54:05 | |
| commission's really. | 00:54:08 | |
| Gonna hang their hat on the. | 00:54:12 | |
| We have no problem. | 00:54:13 | |
| Putting that in there, well, I I don't see any problem with it myself that that way at least the the the homeowner acknowledges | 00:54:15 | |
| it. | 00:54:18 | |
| It's not going to guarantee somebody is not going to complain, but it still helps you somewhat, yeah. | 00:54:23 | |
| While we're on the restrictions, we've got no problem with including that in there about the access easement. | 00:54:28 | |
| That it cannot be affected limited and that. | 00:54:32 | |
| I don't know how exactly we'll word it yet, but there's there will be people, you know. | 00:54:37 | |
| Vehicles that will be on that vehicle on that road there, we'll make sure we include that in there. | 00:54:41 | |
| And an HOA is required by your ordinance. | 00:54:46 | |
| Right. | 00:54:48 | |
| And then as. | 00:54:50 | |
| Brad mentioned. | 00:54:52 | |
| Language can be added in there about not blocking these. | 00:54:53 | |
| OK. And and that's already as part of the D that created that easement. | 00:54:56 | |
| You can't eliminate that, so that language is already there legally. | 00:55:00 | |
| OK, he cannot give. | 00:55:04 | |
| Additional approval. | 00:55:06 | |
| For other people. | 00:55:08 | |
| Access that though. | 00:55:09 | |
| Correct. So nobody can, we cannot limit the use of that easement and he cannot expand the use of that easement without our | 00:55:10 | |
| approval. So it's. | 00:55:14 | |
| We're in the same in the same system, right? | 00:55:19 | |
| Nobody can make any changes without everybody. | 00:55:21 | |
| Yes, Sir. | 00:55:24 | |
| Now the the pipe that he's talking from the church to. | 00:55:25 | |
| North Duffy Rd. That's a long time, long way. | 00:55:28 | |
| Yeah, that's that was an well. | 00:55:32 | |
| I thought I mentioned pipe now also. No no no. The only pipe you mentioned was going underneath the. | 00:55:35 | |
| Undergoing our son's role. | 00:55:41 | |
| We'll double check it again, right? | 00:55:44 | |
| And that's where, of course, he wanted the. | 00:55:46 | |
| The bridge. | 00:55:48 | |
| Wait or yeah? | 00:55:49 | |
| OK. | 00:55:53 | |
| So I just want, I guess what I want to make sure of this is that that. | 00:55:54 | |
| That we. | 00:55:57 | |
| Address the conditions adequately. | 00:55:59 | |
| And we don't have, we don't have to redo a whole lot of stuff here. | 00:56:01 | |
| Well, I understand, I understand, but we don't necessarily want to. I understand, right? | 00:56:05 | |
| Right. Well, that's not what I'm talking about, what you just agreed to. | 00:56:11 | |
| To to change the, the as far as the language on the easement, yes, Sir, that's not a problem at all. And that I believe that was | 00:56:15 | |
| part of the staff report, staff recommendation. So. | 00:56:20 | |
| OK. | 00:56:26 | |
| Any other questions for these general? | 00:56:29 | |
| I think Mr. | 00:56:31 | |
| There was an earlier question about landscaping. | 00:56:32 | |
| The pear trees or whatever. | 00:56:36 | |
| Hello. | 00:56:38 | |
| I'll ask Miss Anderson this question. I think Brad prepares are illegal to sell in Indiana now, right? They are not illegal to | 00:56:41 | |
| sell yet, but. | 00:56:43 | |
| On all of our landscape plants, we have asked the landscapers put which trees they are not and Bradford parries on the list of. | 00:56:46 | |
| They will not plant. | 00:56:53 | |
| I have a personal amendment against Bradford Paris as well. I do too. | 00:56:54 | |
| So is there? | 00:57:03 | |
| Is there any? | 00:57:04 | |
| Landscaping buffer between this subdivision and. | 00:57:06 | |
| No, because they're both zoned the same. | 00:57:10 | |
| Right. But I believe one of the conditions was. | 00:57:13 | |
| That we follow the Indiana ID and our tree species list and. | 00:57:16 | |
| That's no problem. We can do that absolutely 100% staff and I already discussed that. We've got no problem with that as the | 00:57:20 | |
| worded. | 00:57:23 | |
| On the recommendation. | 00:57:26 | |
| OK. | 00:57:28 | |
| Anything else? | 00:57:29 | |
| Everybody cool. | 00:57:34 | |
| All right. Thanks guys. Figure out all these. | 00:57:36 | |
| All right, this time I'm looking for a ballot if anybody has one. I have a ballot for 16 and 17 but. | 00:57:40 | |
| I'll read them and then we'll go go from there, do one at a time. | 00:57:48 | |
| Yes, OK. I'm Chris Welch. | 00:57:51 | |
| Docket number FC 0326. | 00:57:55 | |
| 16. | 00:57:59 | |
| Petitioner named Spring Hills Holdings LLC. | 00:58:00 | |
| Flight ordinance authority. Floyd County Subdivision control. | 00:58:05 | |
| Ordinance Article 1. | 00:58:09 | |
| 10 the Floyd County. | 00:58:11 | |
| Planning Commission. | 00:58:13 | |
| May grant modifications. | 00:58:14 | |
| To the required. | 00:58:16 | |
| Requirements of all subdivision control ordinance. | 00:58:18 | |
| Only if all of the following criteria met. | 00:58:21 | |
| One, the modification will not be detrimental to the. | 00:58:25 | |
| Public Health. | 00:58:29 | |
| In safety or general welfare. | 00:58:31 | |
| To the modification will not adversely. | 00:58:33 | |
| Affect adjacent property. | 00:58:36 | |
| 3 The modification is justified. | 00:58:38 | |
| Justified because it's exceptional topographical. | 00:58:41 | |
| Or other physical conditions unique to the property. | 00:58:45 | |
| Involved is not correct. | 00:58:48 | |
| Near the inconvenience or financial disadvantage? | 00:58:51 | |
| For the condition upon which this modification request is based. | 00:58:56 | |
| Are unique for the property for which the relief is sought. | 00:59:01 | |
| And not applicable generally to. | 00:59:05 | |
| To other property. | 00:59:07 | |
| This property has a large hill present that adds to the scenery of the site. | 00:59:09 | |
| Five the Commission. | 00:59:15 | |
| The modification is consistent. | 00:59:17 | |
| With. | 00:59:20 | |
| Incident, intent and purpose of the ordinance in the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:59:21 | |
| The condition necessary 6. The condition necessary. | 00:59:28 | |
| The modification was created by the owner or applicant. | 00:59:32 | |
| The hill is. | 00:59:35 | |
| Pre-existing. | 00:59:37 | |
| 7 The relief sought will not in any way vary. | 00:59:39 | |
| The provision or zoning ordinance. | 00:59:43 | |
| The approval is consistent. | 00:59:46 | |
| With provisions in the zoning ordinance. | 00:59:48 | |
| After careful review, the Planning Commission. | 00:59:55 | |
| Finds that the variance. | 00:59:59 | |
| Modification will not. | 01:00:01 | |
| Be detrimental to the public health and safety of the general welfare. | 01:00:03 | |
| The modification is justified because of an exceptional. | 01:00:07 | |
| Topographical or other physical conditions unique to the property. | 01:00:11 | |
| Involved. | 01:00:16 | |
| And is not to correct mere inconveniences or financial disadvantage. | 01:00:17 | |
| Not to have a significant impact to the health, safety or general welfare of the public. | 01:00:23 | |
| The fire territory. | 01:00:29 | |
| Has expressed it. | 01:00:30 | |
| An intent to serve. | 01:00:32 | |
| To the variance. | 01:00:34 | |
| Modification will not. | 01:00:36 | |
| Adversely. | 01:00:38 | |
| Affect the adjacent property because the grade of the roadway is used solely for the access of the seven. | 01:00:39 | |
| Lots. | 01:00:46 | |
| 3 The variance modification is justified because. | 01:00:48 | |
| Of an exception. | 01:00:53 | |
| Exceptional topographical. | 01:00:54 | |
| Or other physical conditions. | 01:00:57 | |
| Unique to the property involved. | 01:01:00 | |
| And is not to correct the mere inconvenience of financial disadvantage because? | 01:01:02 | |
| The modification is unique. | 01:01:07 | |
| By the unique condition of a large hill present on the site. | 01:01:09 | |
| And otherwise developed. | 01:01:14 | |
| This location would. | 01:01:16 | |
| Would drastically change the shape of the terrain. | 01:01:17 | |
| For the condition upon. | 01:01:21 | |
| This variance modification request is based. | 01:01:24 | |
| Are unique to the property. | 01:01:27 | |
| For which the relief. | 01:01:31 | |
| Is sought in his. | 01:01:33 | |
| Not applicable generally. | 01:01:35 | |
| Two other properties because the property has a large hill present that adds to the scenery of the site. | 01:01:38 | |
| The variance modification is consistent. | 01:01:45 | |
| With the intent and purpose of the ordinance. | 01:01:49 | |
| Of the comprehensive plan. | 01:01:52 | |
| Because the comprehensive plan covered. | 01:01:54 | |
| Preserving natural and rural characteristics in the community. | 01:01:56 | |
| This modification allows a subdivision to retain a unique feature. | 01:02:01 | |
| That would otherwise. | 01:02:05 | |
| Have to be removed for development to occur. | 01:02:07 | |
| 6 The condition necessary. | 01:02:11 | |
| Are the conditions necessitating the variance modification was not created by the owner? | 01:02:15 | |
| Or the applet because the hill was. | 01:02:22 | |
| Hill is pre-existing. | 01:02:24 | |
| 7. | 01:02:26 | |
| The relief sought will not in any way vary. | 01:02:28 | |
| The provisions of the zoning ordinance because of the approval. | 01:02:32 | |
| Is is consistent? | 01:02:36 | |
| With. | 01:02:38 | |
| Provisions in the zoning ordinance. | 01:02:39 | |
| The Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants. | 01:02:42 | |
| The petition. | 01:02:45 | |
| Petitioners Subdivision control variance modifications. The meeting held on the 13th day. | 01:02:47 | |
| Of April. | 01:02:54 | |
| 2026. | 01:02:54 | |
| And we're going to have to add conditions. | 01:02:58 | |
| No, no. | 01:03:03 | |
| It's gonna be Hill. | 01:03:07 | |
| OK. So the next one OK. | 01:03:09 | |
| So no conditions. | 01:03:11 | |
| On 16. | 01:03:13 | |
| So that's all you're about. Does that complete your ballot? | 01:03:17 | |
| All right. We have a completed ballot. I'm looking for a second. | 01:03:19 | |
| Second, I do have a second any discussion? | 01:03:22 | |
| No further discussion. All in favor signify by. | 01:03:26 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:03:29 | |
| Thank you. All right. | 01:03:31 | |
| 17. | 01:03:34 | |
| I've got 17 also 17 also. | 01:03:35 | |
| Ballot for primary approval of the sub of a major subdivision. | 01:03:52 | |
| Ordinance Authority. | 01:03:57 | |
| Statutory authority. IC367-4701. | 01:03:59 | |
| Comma ETSEQ. | 01:04:06 | |
| Period. The subdivision. Its name is Spring Hill Subdivision. Tape is major. | 01:04:09 | |
| The docket number is FC. | 01:04:13 | |
| 03. | 01:04:16 | |
| Dash 26. | 01:04:17 | |
| Dash 17. | 01:04:19 | |
| Applicants owners name. | 01:04:21 | |
| Spring Hill Holdings. | 01:04:23 | |
| LLC. | 01:04:25 | |
| One the petitioner has met the following requirements. | 01:04:27 | |
| A Preliminary plans provided. | 01:04:32 | |
| The certificate certifications. | 01:04:36 | |
| Certifications. | 01:04:41 | |
| Demonstrating compliance with IDM Rule 5. | 01:04:43 | |
| See Platt provided identifies all. | 01:04:49 | |
| Pertinent information pursuant to the. | 01:04:53 | |
| SCO in the Floyd County Planning Commission. | 01:04:57 | |
| Our Planning and Zoning Commission rules and procedures. | 01:05:00 | |
| D Geo Technical report provided. | 01:05:05 | |
| It's not the traffic impact study. | 01:05:08 | |
| Provided. | 01:05:13 | |
| F Phase One Environmental Audit report. | 01:05:15 | |
| Provided which is not applicable. | 01:05:18 | |
| G site plan provides. | 01:05:22 | |
| Provided that shows topographic. | 01:05:24 | |
| Topographic. | 01:05:27 | |
| Wetlands flood. | 01:05:28 | |
| Hazard areas, steep slopes, those exceeding 16%. | 01:05:30 | |
| In shows in soils shown. | 01:05:34 | |
| On the soil. | 01:05:38 | |
| Survey of the Floyd County of having severe limitations for Urban Development. | 01:05:39 | |
| Age the lots. | 01:05:46 | |
| One all lots either comply with. | 01:05:48 | |
| The Floyd County zoning ordinance requirement or a subdivision. | 01:05:52 | |
| Subdivision control. | 01:05:57 | |
| Has been approved for. | 01:05:59 | |
| Non conforming lots. | 01:06:01 | |
| Two lots are not laid out along existing arterial. | 01:06:06 | |
| Our collector of local roads. | 01:06:11 | |
| Three lots. | 01:06:13 | |
| All lots meet. | 01:06:15 | |
| The length requirements. | 01:06:16 | |
| Of the. | 01:06:19 | |
| SCO. | 01:06:20 | |
| Streets. | 01:06:21 | |
| One streets and cul de sacs comply. | 01:06:24 | |
| With dimensional and geographical standards. | 01:06:27 | |
| Of the SEO. | 01:06:30 | |
| 2 traffic. | 01:06:32 | |
| Calming measures are identified. | 01:06:34 | |
| Where more than 30 lots are provided. | 01:06:37 | |
| 3. | 01:06:41 | |
| In a public St. serving this subdivision. | 01:06:42 | |
| Meets the SEO surface type. | 01:06:45 | |
| In right away requirements. | 01:06:48 | |
| 4 All streets are named. | 01:06:51 | |
| 5. | 01:06:54 | |
| There are. | 01:06:55 | |
| Not any permanent dead in streets. | 01:06:56 | |
| Or any private streets. | 01:06:59 | |
| 6. | 01:07:02 | |
| Approval received for any subdivision streets. | 01:07:06 | |
| That intersect. | 01:07:09 | |
| With the state highway. | 01:07:10 | |
| It's not applicable. | 01:07:13 | |
| 7 Curbs and gutters conform. | 01:07:15 | |
| To the N dot standard specifications or equivalent standards as determined by the county engineer. | 01:07:18 | |
| J Driveways, intersections and entries entrances. | 01:07:27 | |
| Excuse me a second. | 01:07:31 | |
| J Driveways, intersections, and entrances. | 01:07:41 | |
| 1-2 subdivision injuries are provided. | 01:07:45 | |
| Where 50 or more lots are proposed. | 01:07:49 | |
| Two driveway separations meet the requirements of the. | 01:07:53 | |
| SEO. | 01:07:58 | |
| Three all driveways and intersections are located in accordance with the SCO. | 01:08:00 | |
| K Sidewalks. | 01:08:06 | |
| Sidewalks are provided on both sides of the subdivision streets. | 01:08:08 | |
| Where the gross density of the subdivision is more. | 01:08:12 | |
| Than one lot per acre. | 01:08:15 | |
| Two, pedestrian access is provided. | 01:08:18 | |
| To any park common space. | 01:08:22 | |
| Our recreation facility located within the subdivision. | 01:08:24 | |
| 3 Protective. | 01:08:30 | |
| Covenants. | 01:08:33 | |
| Assign the obligation for the. | 01:08:35 | |
| The maintenance and repair of the sidewalks and trails. | 01:08:37 | |
| To lots owners association. | 01:08:40 | |
| All covenants are. | 01:08:45 | |
| Consistent with this. | 01:08:47 | |
| SCO. | 01:08:49 | |
| Two, petitioner has. | 01:08:50 | |
| Met the following requirements for drainage and storage stormwater. | 01:08:53 | |
| AN dot IDNR approval. | 01:08:59 | |
| Obtain. | 01:09:03 | |
| For altercations to the natural drainage pattern in natural stream patterns. | 01:09:05 | |
| Caused by the construction of the subdivision. | 01:09:10 | |
| B. Any drainage system. | 01:09:14 | |
| Will be installed. Meets the standard. | 01:09:16 | |
| Of the SCO. | 01:09:20 | |
| See drainage report. | 01:09:21 | |
| Has is provided. | 01:09:23 | |
| 3 Petitioner. | 01:09:27 | |
| Has provided. | 01:09:28 | |
| A letter confir. | 01:09:30 | |
| Confirming availability in willingness to serve for the necessary utilities. Water. | 01:09:31 | |
| Sewer. | 01:09:38 | |
| Fire Protection. | 01:09:39 | |
| Telephone. | 01:09:40 | |
| Gas and electric. | 01:09:41 | |
| 4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer. | 01:09:44 | |
| Or septic service. | 01:09:48 | |
| A service. | 01:09:50 | |
| For subdivision, lots will be extended to the IDE. | 01:09:52 | |
| Approved. Approved municipal. | 01:09:56 | |
| Or county owned. | 01:10:00 | |
| Or. | 01:10:02 | |
| Operated sanitary sewer system. | 01:10:04 | |
| Which is not applicable. | 01:10:07 | |
| B Conditions used. | 01:10:09 | |
| To approve by the Floyd County Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:10:12 | |
| For a news. | 01:10:15 | |
| Wastewater treatment plant is not applicable. | 01:10:16 | |
| Or the septic which? | 01:10:20 | |
| It's not applicable. | 01:10:22 | |
| Umm. | 01:10:25 | |
| I'll go. The septic systems meet the following requirements. It's not applicable. The ISDH approval provides for all. | 01:10:32 | |
| Septic systems and filters. This is not going to be a septic system. | 01:10:40 | |
| It's gonna be sanitary. | 01:10:44 | |
| So. | 01:10:47 | |
| The decision upon careful review. | 01:10:49 | |
| The Floyd County. | 01:10:51 | |
| Planning Commission hereby grants. | 01:10:52 | |
| The petition primary application for major subdivision. | 01:10:55 | |
| In the meeting held This meeting held on the 13th day of April 2026. | 01:10:59 | |
| Primary approval is based on. | 01:11:04 | |
| Completion of the following conditions. | 01:11:07 | |
| One show location. | 01:11:11 | |
| Location of the easement. | 01:11:12 | |
| Of on the plat before the final. | 01:11:14 | |
| Plat approval. | 01:11:17 | |
| 2A maximum grade of 14% is approved. | 01:11:20 | |
| For the street leading to lots 27 through 33. | 01:11:24 | |
| Approximately 400 feet, known as Thelma. | 01:11:29 | |
| Or yeah, Thelma Lane. | 01:11:32 | |
| Per FC-03. | 01:11:34 | |
| Dash 26-16. | 01:11:38 | |
| 3 drainage. | 01:11:41 | |
| Storm water. | 01:11:43 | |
| In erosion control plans must be updated. | 01:11:44 | |
| And submitted to the Platte Stormwater Department for review and given. | 01:11:47 | |
| Given by the department prior. | 01:11:53 | |
| To final plat. | 01:11:55 | |
| Approval. | 01:11:57 | |
| Four add to the HOA covenants. | 01:11:59 | |
| Either a recommendation. | 01:12:03 | |
| Or requirement. | 01:12:05 | |
| To utilize the most up-to-date. | 01:12:06 | |
| Indiana Indiana NET Department of Natural Resources. | 01:12:09 | |
| Tree species list. | 01:12:13 | |
| For any tree plantings. | 01:12:16 | |
| And that is? | 01:12:19 | |
| The petition. | 01:12:21 | |
| In decisions at this point. | 01:12:22 | |
| I thought we got some others they had. Is that true, Victor? | 01:12:26 | |
| The one the one that we needed to add was that they're going to add. | 01:12:29 | |
| To the age I think it's to the HOA for. | 01:12:33 | |
| Don't ride it until we get it approved here. | 01:12:36 | |
| To no in regards to the, let the. | 01:12:38 | |
| Property owners know that there is agriculture. | 01:12:42 | |
| Activity in the area? Is that not what we that you all agree to if I'm not mistaken? | 01:12:46 | |
| Should that be written? | 01:12:51 | |
| He's just saying that. | 01:12:53 | |
| They agreed to include in the HOA documents notice to the homeowners that agricultural activity exists nearby. | 01:12:56 | |
| But notice will be given to HOA. OK. | 01:13:04 | |
| In regards to agriculture activity. | 01:13:07 | |
| Developer will include in the HOA documents. | 01:13:10 | |
| OK, notice to HOA. | 01:13:15 | |
| No, forget that. | 01:13:17 | |
| What are the developer? | 01:13:19 | |
| Will provide in the HOA documents. | 01:13:22 | |
| Well. | 01:13:30 | |
| HOA documents. | 01:13:39 | |
| Notice to homeowners. | 01:13:41 | |
| That agricultural activity. | 01:13:49 | |
| Home. | 01:13:52 | |
| Exists nearby. | 01:13:56 | |
| They'll know it when they smell it. | 01:14:08 | |
| I have a brain. | 01:14:12 | |
| Bring an agricultural. | 01:14:14 | |
| Activity. | 01:14:17 | |
| How Jim Butcher does. | 01:14:22 | |
| Tell me when you're the the other ones involved in the easement. And I think that they've agreed that there would be language in | 01:14:39 | |
| the HOA documents. | 01:14:43 | |
| That the easement remains. | 01:14:47 | |
| And that no homeowner shall. | 01:14:49 | |
| Restrict. | 01:14:52 | |
| Use and access of that easement. | 01:14:53 | |
| Easement to. | 01:14:57 | |
| Existing. | 01:15:00 | |
| That the developer agrees. | 01:15:02 | |
| To put in the HOA documents. | 01:15:07 | |
| Yes. | 01:15:25 | |
| That an easement exists. | 01:15:26 | |
| And that no homeowner. | 01:15:35 | |
| No homeowner. | 01:15:49 | |
| Shall prohibit. | 01:15:50 | |
| Or restrict access. | 01:15:52 | |
| To that easement. | 01:15:56 | |
| Prohibit. | 01:15:57 | |
| And what did you say? Pro shall put Arboretum. | 01:16:00 | |
| The use of that easement. | 01:16:05 | |
| The news. | 01:16:12 | |
| Agriculture is within their future. | 01:16:15 | |
| Is that is that the only easement on the? | 01:16:18 | |
| Property. | 01:16:20 | |
| Do you would you prefer if we specifically reference Fentress easement just to make clear? | 01:16:22 | |
| Clear what we're talking about, are you? | 01:16:27 | |
| Records the lot numbers so it's great. | 01:16:32 | |
| Yeah, yeah. If you just in front of the very beginning of both of those, if you just put yes. | 01:16:35 | |
| I'll do that here. | 01:16:42 | |
| Just don't don't change anything. Just add feather. | 01:16:44 | |
| He spelled it. I want to make sure it's got to be here. | 01:16:50 | |
| Fritters Fentress easement. | 01:16:55 | |
| I wanna make sure. | 01:16:57 | |
| Print filter easement. | 01:16:59 | |
| Developer agrees to put in the HO. | 01:17:04 | |
| A documents that and even exist and no homeowner. | 01:17:07 | |
| Shall prohibit or restrict that that use of the. | 01:17:11 | |
| Correct. And then do you have the other one? | 01:17:15 | |
| Developer will provide. | 01:17:18 | |
| In the. | 01:17:20 | |
| Documents. | 01:17:23 | |
| Notice to the homeowner. | 01:17:24 | |
| Trust that agricultural. | 01:17:25 | |
| Homeowners that agricultural. | 01:17:32 | |
| What activities are next nearby? | 01:17:35 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 01:17:38 | |
| OK, it's almost the end of their page. We got a little wordy on those. | 01:17:40 | |
| I know, I know. | 01:17:45 | |
| OK, I'm going to. | 01:17:48 | |
| Go back through those. | 01:17:49 | |
| Just the ones you added please. | 01:17:52 | |
| In that this is. | 01:17:54 | |
| On. | 01:17:56 | |
| I just want to make sure that you all know that this is on FC-0326-17. | 01:17:57 | |
| This is just on what we added. | 01:18:03 | |
| Five the developer will provide in the HOA documents. | 01:18:07 | |
| Notice to the homeowners. | 01:18:11 | |
| That agricultural activities are nearby. | 01:18:14 | |
| Exist nearby. Exist nearby. | 01:18:19 | |
| OK. | 01:18:26 | |
| Six Pinterest easement. | 01:18:29 | |
| Developers. | 01:18:33 | |
| Agree to put in the HOA documents that the an easement exists. | 01:18:34 | |
| In no homeowners. | 01:18:39 | |
| Shall prohibit. | 01:18:40 | |
| Or restrict that use of that easement. | 01:18:42 | |
| Yeah, OK, Mr. Finters. | 01:18:45 | |
| All right. No, you don't ask it. | 01:18:47 | |
| Yeah, that's right. | 01:18:50 | |
| I want to make sure that OK that that. | 01:18:52 | |
| Conclude your ballot. Is that correct? That is correct. | 01:18:55 | |
| OK, so. | 01:18:57 | |
| Are you good with? | 01:18:59 | |
| OK, that ballot is complete. I'm looking for a second. | 01:19:00 | |
| I'll second that we have a second. Any further discussion? | 01:19:03 | |
| If none. | 01:19:07 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 01:19:08 | |
| Aye. And those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 01:19:10 | |
| All righty, next item. | 01:19:13 | |
| Let's move this, move this ship on. | 01:19:15 | |
| Agenda item docket FC-03-206-18 Primary approval. | 01:19:18 | |
| Of a major subdivision, applicant is seeking primary approval of a commercial subdivision to be known as Summit Ridge Commons. | 01:19:24 | |
| The proposal covers 17.6 acres. | 01:19:32 | |
| To be split into six lots with a common area. | 01:19:35 | |
| Common area lot and gross density of 2.93 units per acre. | 01:19:37 | |
| Application Application is accompanied by two development standard variance requests. | 01:19:44 | |
| That are heard. | 01:19:49 | |
| That. | 01:19:51 | |
| Are heard before the April 13th. | 01:19:51 | |
| It should have been at April 13th. Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:19:55 | |
| I heard before at the April 13th 5:00 PM Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:19:59 | |
| Applicant Prime. | 01:20:04 | |
| Property Development Company, LLC. | 01:20:06 | |
| Site unaddressed location. It's on East Luther Rd. north of Lawrence Bannat. | 01:20:09 | |
| And east of Hwy. 160. | 01:20:16 | |
| At this time, Frank. | 01:20:19 | |
| It's your all right. | 01:20:20 | |
| Docket #FC32618. Petitioner, Prime Property development Co. | 01:20:22 | |
| Representative Jason Copperweight. | 01:20:27 | |
| Location along Hwy. 150 on an unaddressed lot. | 01:20:28 | |
| Parcel #2241983DOT000-6. | 01:20:32 | |
| Request major subdivision. Primary approval of the major subdivision. | 01:20:38 | |
| For Summit Ridge Commons, this is also a commercial subdivision. | 01:20:42 | |
| Zoning District, General commercial. | 01:20:46 | |
| The petitioner is seeking preliminary approval of a commercial subdivision to be known as Summit Ridge Commons. | 01:20:48 | |
| The proposal covers 17.6 acres to be split into six lots, with a common area utilizing 8.88 acres. | 01:20:53 | |
| With the remainder of the property to be retained is undeveloped land. | 01:20:59 | |
| The developed portion has a proposed gross density of .68 units per acre, not excluding common area and right of way. | 01:21:03 | |
| The common area contains a total of 0.477 acres and is located at the north of the parent tract. | 01:21:10 | |
| Being developed. | 01:21:16 | |
| The property is located within a commercial growth area of the Lafayette Township and falls under the Highlander Point Overlay | 01:21:18 | |
| District, with the Highlander Point Corridor identified as the main commercial corridor and a primary gateway for the county as | 01:21:22 | |
| identified by the Comprehensive Plan. | 01:21:27 | |
| This property is surrounded by commercial and residential growth areas within the Lafayette Township. | 01:21:32 | |
| This land is designated as a growth area due to its proximity to utilities, Hwy. 64 and existing amenities such as shops, schools, | 01:21:37 | |
| and other institutions. | 01:21:41 | |
| With an intent to focus development here rather than in areas that the plan has designated as transitional or agricultural areas. | 01:21:45 | |
| To the east is the platted subdivision of Fairway Estates is owned a residential suburban. | 01:21:52 | |
| To the north along the southern side E loop of East Luther Rd. are a vacant property and a single family residence zone. Urban | 01:21:57 | |
| residential. | 01:22:00 | |
| To the West, across Hwy. 150 are wooded properties, zoned residential, suburban and urban residential. | 01:22:05 | |
| To the southwest. | 01:22:10 | |
| South and Southeast are various property zone, general commercial. | 01:22:11 | |
| The site has proposed access through the. | 01:22:15 | |
| New proposed signalized intersection along Hwy. 150 that will connect to the new JC on the other side of the highway. | 01:22:18 | |
| The site will further connect. | 01:22:24 | |
| The site proposes further connection to the Lafollette. | 01:22:28 | |
| Commercial platted. | 01:22:31 | |
| Subdivision to the South and will have a road ext. | 01:22:32 | |
| To allow for connections to East Luther Rd. should further. | 01:22:36 | |
| Future development occur. | 01:22:39 | |
| The proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to serve letters from the local public services and was included with the | 01:22:41 | |
| regional traffic study. | 01:22:44 | |
| A plot review was held on April 1st. | 01:22:48 | |
| For the staff review. | 01:22:50 | |
| The petitioner has provided A compliant preliminary plan for the project. | 01:22:52 | |
| The petitioner has provided certification that all drainage and environmental requirements will be complied with and that there | 01:22:55 | |
| are no known outstanding issues concerning item. | 01:22:58 | |
| This is page nine of the actual application. | 01:23:02 | |
| A geotechnical report was performed by Paul Primavera and Associates. | 01:23:04 | |
| A phase one environmental study is not required. | 01:23:08 | |
| Our regional traffic study was completed and provides adequate level of service. | 01:23:10 | |
| A variance is requested from the 200 foot long frontage width requirement for lots one through 4 and lot 6. | 01:23:15 | |
| And from the one acre requirement for lots 1-2 and four. | 01:23:21 | |
| This was approved. | 01:23:24 | |
| Before the Board of Zoning Appeals. | 01:23:26 | |
| Other locks meet the size and frontage with standards of the Floyd County zoning ordinance for the residential suburban district | 01:23:28 | |
| and are laid out along subdivision streets compliant with. | 01:23:32 | |
| Subdivision control and standards. | 01:23:36 | |
| And I apologize that should read as general commercial district, non residential suburban. | 01:23:39 | |
| La Follette Station Dr. is continued to the north of the subdivision. | 01:23:44 | |
| From the South connection point and is proposed as a subdivision St. that connects to the La Follette. | 01:23:47 | |
| Commercial subdivision along Lawrence Bennett Rd. | 01:23:52 | |
| Riley Drive is also provided as a subdivision St. providing access to US Hwy. 1 fifties anticipated intersection. | 01:23:55 | |
| Sidewalks are provided. | 01:24:01 | |
| A drainage report and preliminary plan were submitted with the application. | 01:24:03 | |
| Full drainage compliance with. | 01:24:07 | |
| County stormwater regulations will be required prior to secondary approval. | 01:24:08 | |
| The Stormwater Director offers the following comment. Access to the two proposed detention areas will need to be considered before | 01:24:12 | |
| primary or before final approval. | 01:24:15 | |
| The petitioner has provided willingness to serve letters from CenterPoint Energy for natural gas. | 01:24:20 | |
| Harrison RMC, Floyd's Knobs Water Company and Highlander Fire Protection. | 01:24:24 | |
| Protection District. | 01:24:28 | |
| Wastewater will be provided by New Albany Wastewater. | 01:24:29 | |
| For staff comments. | 01:24:32 | |
| The 2017 Comprehensive Plan indicates an opportunity to focus on entrepreneurship. | 01:24:34 | |
| Detailed on pages 2831 and 37 of that plan. | 01:24:38 | |
| Entrepreneurs and commercial uses do not have a uniform set of needs for space. | 01:24:42 | |
| The website loopnets. | 01:24:46 | |
| Loopnet let's. | 01:24:48 | |
| Commercial lots in the local area and of the 16 listed lots, two of them were under one acre, potentially indicating a lack of | 01:24:49 | |
| supply in the size range. | 01:24:53 | |
| While This site is wooded, the site was previously cleared as recently as 2010. Many of the trees on the site are invasive species | 01:24:57 | |
| that do not add to the rural character or ecological health of the community. | 01:25:01 | |
| For staff recommendations. | 01:25:06 | |
| Whereas the drainage and stormwater plants are requirements before the final approval. | 01:25:09 | |
| Where the subdivision control ordinance requires developments, meet zoning ordinance, where a covenant for a shared maintenance | 01:25:13 | |
| should be on record and where the comprehensive plan encourages. | 01:25:17 | |
| Protecting the rural character of the community as well as promoting entrepreneurship and where Lafollette Station. | 01:25:22 | |
| Drive is a private road. | 01:25:27 | |
| Staff recommends the following conditions be met before final approval. | 01:25:29 | |
| One final approval of drainage stormwater violence. | 01:25:33 | |
| To a development standards. | 01:25:35 | |
| Variance for the lot area and lot with frontage is approved for. | 01:25:37 | |
| FC 3/26/19 and FC 3/26/20. Both of those have been approved. | 01:25:41 | |
| Commercial 3 Commercial Association Covenants for shared maintenance of open space or add to the Commercial Association covenants | 01:25:46 | |
| either a recommendation or requirement to utilize the most up-to-date Indiana Department of Natural Resources Trees species list | 01:25:51 | |
| for any tree plantings. | 01:25:56 | |
| And have any shared access? | 01:26:02 | |
| Shared Maintenance agreement for use of Shared Access and maintenance agreement for use of Lafollette. | 01:26:06 | |
| Station drive or create a temporary cul-de-sac dead end where La Follette Station Dr. is intended to connect. | 01:26:11 | |
| All right. Thanks, Frank. Anybody have any questions for Frank on the staff report? | 01:26:19 | |
| I do not. | 01:26:24 | |
| Do not nobody understand. | 01:26:25 | |
| Thanks Frank. Appreciate you an applicant come forward state your name and address for you and Jason Copper weight from Avera and | 01:26:27 | |
| Associates, 1000 Bell Lane, New Albany, IN. | 01:26:31 | |
| They representing the applicant. | 01:26:35 | |
| To be brief, I don't have the staff always. As always, did a great job. | 01:26:38 | |
| Presenting the project. | 01:26:44 | |
| The only thing I would add is that the last. | 01:26:46 | |
| The last recommendation that they made? | 01:26:49 | |
| Which is. | 01:26:51 | |
| A temporary turn around. | 01:26:52 | |
| Access through La Follette Drive. | 01:26:54 | |
| I would add a third item to, that is if they were to find a secondary access. | 01:26:56 | |
| Approved by the Commission. | 01:27:01 | |
| That that would also be an acceptable condition. | 01:27:02 | |
| Acceptable. | 01:27:05 | |
| Scenario that satisfies the condition. | 01:27:07 | |
| That would be versus otherwise we agree with that. That would replace. | 01:27:09 | |
| That turn around and said one of the three OK, temporary turn around, OK. | 01:27:13 | |
| Access through the follow drive OK. | 01:27:18 | |
| Or. | 01:27:20 | |
| Second entrance through some other property. | 01:27:21 | |
| If it becomes available. | 01:27:23 | |
| That would be. | 01:27:25 | |
| Or create a temp you still want create one of the 33. | 01:27:27 | |
| Would meet. | 01:27:30 | |
| Sure. | 01:27:35 | |
| As approved. OK. | 01:27:37 | |
| All right, that's fair enough. Make that easy. | 01:27:38 | |
| Less writing. | 01:27:40 | |
| Fair enough. | 01:27:41 | |
| Otherwise, we agree with the conditions you done. | 01:27:44 | |
| Yes. Any questions for Mr. Copper? Wait on the board. | 01:27:46 | |
| All right, all righty. Thank you, Mr. Copper weight. | 01:27:50 | |
| Now we open up for anybody who wants to speak in favor. | 01:27:54 | |
| Please come forward. | 01:27:57 | |
| State your name and address. | 01:28:00 | |
| For the record. | 01:28:03 | |
| My name is Steve Thiemann. I live it. | 01:28:04 | |
| 3593 Lafayette Parkway. | 01:28:06 | |
| The only thing I want to bring up is. | 01:28:09 | |
| Those are private streets. | 01:28:11 | |
| Lafayette. | 01:28:13 | |
| So how? How do you handle that? | 01:28:15 | |
| The HOA. | 01:28:18 | |
| Takes care of those streets. | 01:28:19 | |
| So if there's traffic coming down, is there going to be a light? | 01:28:21 | |
| At 1:50. | 01:28:26 | |
| OK. Yeah. So. | 01:28:28 | |
| I mean, we take care of our own streets as they're all private. So how do you handle that? | 01:28:30 | |
| We'll have to give him time to come back up and and. | 01:28:35 | |
| OK. All right. That's all. OK. Thanks, Steve. All righty. | 01:28:40 | |
| Anybody else in favor? | 01:28:45 | |
| OK, now we open up. Anybody that's against it in opposition, please come forward. | 01:28:48 | |
| Thank you, Lord. | 01:28:56 | |
| All right, this time, Mr. Cartwright, would you like to just. | 01:28:58 | |
| Refer to Mr. | 01:29:02 | |
| Ingleman's comment. | 01:29:03 | |
| So Mr. Feenyman is correct as. | 01:29:04 | |
| As I say, well should know because he developed the property. | 01:29:06 | |
| La Follette Drive is a private drive that is maintained by the Lot Owners Association. | 01:29:09 | |
| In the Folly station. | 01:29:14 | |
| I think it is the. It is the applicant's desire. | 01:29:16 | |
| Perhaps the desire of a few of the lot owners that maybe that road become a public road at some point in the future. | 01:29:18 | |
| Maintained by the county. | 01:29:23 | |
| But it requires participation of all the lot owners. | 01:29:25 | |
| So it is my clients. | 01:29:29 | |
| Interest to pursue that in the future. | 01:29:33 | |
| In participation with the county or maybe the county would pursue that. | 01:29:36 | |
| Either way. | 01:29:41 | |
| The the physical pavement. | 01:29:42 | |
| Enters into. | 01:29:44 | |
| This property and so it physically can be connect. | 01:29:45 | |
| Now, legal access is another issue. | 01:29:48 | |
| And that's that's the reason for the three. | 01:29:50 | |
| Options that we talked about either a temporary turnaround if we can't get legal access. | 01:29:54 | |
| Get legal access. | 01:29:59 | |
| Or develop some alternate. | 01:30:00 | |
| The entrance some alternate third entrance to come on to come to connect to the South end of the proposed St. one of those three | 01:30:03 | |
| items have to occur. | 01:30:08 | |
| Before we get secondary approved, OK. | 01:30:13 | |
| So right across. That's why I wanna. That's why I wanted to leave some options open for. | 01:30:15 | |
| One of those three, but that's per staff. | 01:30:20 | |
| Right recommendation. | 01:30:22 | |
| Correct. Yes, so. | 01:30:23 | |
| Still haven't seen that Uncle Bill for a year. | 01:30:26 | |
| OK, so there's. | 01:30:30 | |
| But that in order to get that to be public Rd. | 01:30:31 | |
| Everybody has to agree to that, correct? That's correct. And then you have to verify this, that the county can accept it if it's | 01:30:36 | |
| built to their respects and the county would have to agree to accept it. That's correct. So right now all all the commercial lot | 01:30:40 | |
| owners. | 01:30:44 | |
| Owned to the center of Lafollette Station Dr. and then there is a utility and access easement across the roadway so they all would | 01:30:49 | |
| have to deed. | 01:30:53 | |
| A small portion. It'd be their benefit to have it county, wouldn't they somewhat. | 01:30:57 | |
| I mean that's I would think so that's opinion, right? I got it. Everybody's got one. You're dealing with several lot owners and. | 01:31:02 | |
| Personalities, You know how they. | 01:31:08 | |
| All right, good, Mr. Thiemann? Sure, absolutely. | 01:31:09 | |
| Playing for president and we've all voted in. | 01:31:13 | |
| They all agree. | 01:31:16 | |
| OK. | 01:31:18 | |
| Did we talk to you after the meeting? | 01:31:19 | |
| Bring that to the Commissioners. | 01:31:25 | |
| We're not buying, but bring it to the Commissioner. | 01:31:29 | |
| We're not buying. | 01:31:33 | |
| Understand. Thank you. | 01:31:37 | |
| Any other questions? Any other questions for Mr. Copper? | 01:31:39 | |
| Alrighty. Thank you, Mr. Jason. At this time, we'll open it up for a ballot if anybody has one, please. | 01:31:42 | |
| FC03. | 01:31:48 | |
| Dash 26-18, afternoon. | 01:31:50 | |
| Prime property development company. | 01:31:54 | |
| Number one, petitioner has met all the following requirements. A preliminary plan provided. | 01:31:56 | |
| B Certification. | 01:32:01 | |
| Demonstrating compliance with. | 01:32:03 | |
| IDE and Rule 5C Plat provided identifying all pertinent information pursuant to the SCO. | 01:32:05 | |
| And Floyd County Planning and Zoning Commission rules and procedures. | 01:32:11 | |
| D Geotechnical report provided. | 01:32:15 | |
| E Traffic study provided. | 01:32:18 | |
| F is not applicable G site plan provided that shows topography. | 01:32:21 | |
| Wetlands. | 01:32:26 | |
| Blood hazard areas. Steep slopes. | 01:32:27 | |
| In soil shown under soil survey of Floyd County as having. | 01:32:29 | |
| Severe limitations for Urban Development. | 01:32:33 | |
| H Lights. Subdivision control. | 01:32:37 | |
| Been approved for conforming lots. | 01:32:40 | |
| Watch for my lay down along existing arterial collectors or local streets. | 01:32:47 | |
| Three, all lots meet the. | 01:32:52 | |
| Length requirements of the SCO. | 01:32:54 | |
| Ah St. streets in Cul de Sacs comply with the dimensional geographic standards of the SCO. 2 Traffic calming measures are | 01:32:58 | |
| identified. | 01:33:02 | |
| No, that's not actual. | 01:33:07 | |
| #3 any public streets. | 01:33:09 | |
| Serving the subdivision meets the SCO surface types and right of way requirements #4 All streets are named. | 01:33:11 | |
| #5 there are. | 01:33:18 | |
| Or not any pertinent dead end streets or any private streets? | 01:33:19 | |
| Number six. | 01:33:25 | |
| Indiana dot approval received for any subdivision streets intersect with the state highway. | 01:33:26 | |
| #7 Curbs and gutters conform. | 01:33:31 | |
| Did the Indiana dot standard specification for equivalent standards. | 01:33:34 | |
| As determined by the county engineer. | 01:33:38 | |
| J Driveways, intersection entrances. | 01:33:40 | |
| Number one is not Apple. | 01:33:43 | |
| Pool #2 driveway separation meets the pharmacy SEO. | 01:33:45 | |
| #3 All driveways intersections are located in accordance with the SCO. | 01:33:49 | |
| OK, sidewalk side Zack. | 01:33:53 | |
| Walks Harper would write it for the subdivision Streets number 2 is not applicable. | 01:33:55 | |
| #3 Protective cobbles assigned the obligation of the maintenance and repair of sidewalks and trails. | 01:34:02 | |
| To the lot owners associations. | 01:34:08 | |
| How can covenants are consistent with the SCO? | 01:34:11 | |
| #2 Petitioner has. | 01:34:15 | |
| Practitioner. | 01:34:20 | |
| Has will be compliant with all the following requirements or drains using stormwater priority secondary approval. | 01:34:21 | |
| A ID and our approval obtained for. | 01:34:28 | |
| Alterations to the natural drainage patterns and natural. | 01:34:32 | |
| Stream patterns caused by the construction of the subdivision B. Any drainage. | 01:34:35 | |
| System being installed meets the minimum standards of the SCO. | 01:34:40 | |
| See drainage reports provided. | 01:34:44 | |
| #3 Petitioner has provided a letter. | 01:34:46 | |
| Confirming availability and willingness to serve. | 01:34:49 | |
| For all necessary utilities #4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewers. | 01:34:52 | |
| Service for the subdivision lasts. | 01:34:58 | |
| Will be extended to IDE and approved municipal. | 01:35:01 | |
| Or county owned or operated sanitary sewer. | 01:35:04 | |
| System. | 01:35:08 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants. | 01:35:12 | |
| Primary approval for major subdivision. | 01:35:18 | |
| At the meeting held on the 13th day of April. | 01:35:22 | |
| 2026. | 01:35:24 | |
| Primary approval is based on a collision of filing conditions. Final. | 01:35:26 | |
| Approval of all drainage of stormwater plans to finalize commercial association covenants. | 01:35:30 | |
| For shared maintenance of open spaces. | 01:35:35 | |
| #3 add to the commercial association comments either a recommendation. | 01:35:37 | |
| For requirement to utilize the most up-to-date Indiana Department of Natural Resources tree species list. | 01:35:42 | |
| For any tree plantings #4 provided interlocal agreement. | 01:35:47 | |
| For use of Lafollette Station Dr. are created temporary cul-de-sac. | 01:35:52 | |
| Dead end where F La Follette Station Dr. is intended to connect. | 01:35:57 | |
| Or another. | 01:36:02 | |
| Access point as approved. | 01:36:03 | |
| Pasta that completes my belt. | 01:36:05 | |
| All righty, we have a ballot in a second. | 01:36:08 | |
| I do have a second any conversation, any discussion. | 01:36:10 | |
| If none all in favor, signify by aye those opposed likewise. Thank you guys. | 01:36:13 | |
| All righty, don't know anybody leave till we get the ballot signed right now. | 01:36:20 | |
| Is there any other business, Frank? | 01:36:24 | |
| OK, there's no new discussion at this time. I need a motion to adjourn. | 01:36:28 | |
| So moved. | 01:36:32 | |
| Second, all in favor signify by thank you guys and girls. | 01:36:34 |