Floyd County Plan Commission
Live stream not working or buffering in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| On today, March 9th, 2026, 7:00 PM. | 00:00:00 | |
| At this time, we will do the pledge allegiance, please. | 00:00:03 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. | 00:00:08 | |
| And to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God. | 00:00:11 | |
| Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:16 | |
| All righty, at this time we have roll call. | 00:00:21 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:26 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:29 | |
| Here. | 00:00:33 | |
| Mr. Bagshaw here. | 00:00:34 | |
| Here, Mr. Lu. | 00:00:36 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:38 | |
| We have a full board. Thank you everybody. | 00:00:41 | |
| It's nice that there's no football or basketball games on the night. | 00:00:45 | |
| For sure. All right. | 00:00:49 | |
| We'd like to have somebody. | 00:00:53 | |
| Approve the minutes. | 00:00:55 | |
| Of the February 9th. | 00:00:56 | |
| And I was not there. So I will not, I will not be able to vote on that. And Connie, thank you for running that meeting for me in | 00:00:58 | |
| my absence. | 00:01:02 | |
| Like she did a great job, I just want to make it make mention of the. | 00:01:05 | |
| I'm glad I got a good make a motion to approve the minutes. We have a motion. I'll second any discussion. | 00:01:09 | |
| All in favor signify by aye aye. Those opposed likewise thank you. All right now I need medicine for Connie to sign. Who has a | 00:01:16 | |
| copy of the minutes. | 00:01:20 | |
| You got one from. | 00:01:25 | |
| There you go. | 00:01:26 | |
| I want to send a face. | 00:01:27 | |
| All righty. We have no old business. Is that correct, Frank? | 00:01:30 | |
| No old business. | 00:01:33 | |
| OK. New business is agenda item. | 00:01:35 | |
| One that agenda item 1 is FC-02-206-05. | 00:01:38 | |
| And FC-O2-206-06. | 00:01:45 | |
| And we're putting those together. Is that correct? | 00:01:51 | |
| And do we need to ask the applicant for permission or? Yes, I would recommend we ask the applicant to make sure we're getting a | 00:01:54 | |
| thumbs up from Jason Copper weight. OK, you're good with that, Jason. OK, if that's the case, Frank, would you please come up and. | 00:02:00 | |
| Give us your staff report, Sir. | 00:02:05 | |
| Good evening everyone. | 00:02:08 | |
| The proposals for the Ernst Berger Conservation Subdivision. | 00:02:11 | |
| Location of 6060 State Road 62. | 00:02:17 | |
| Georgetown, IN 47122 requesting first a zoning map amendment. This is in the zoning district of Rural Residential RR. | 00:02:20 | |
| And requesting residential suburban. | 00:02:28 | |
| Applicant is requesting A zoning map amendment to rezone 16.682 acres from rural residential to residential suburban with a | 00:02:30 | |
| conservation overlay in the Georgetown Township. | 00:02:35 | |
| The property lies to the north of State Road 62 near the intersection with Unawine Lane and Hancock Rd. located in close proximity | 00:02:40 | |
| to Gary E Cavan Park and the Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:02:44 | |
| This rezone is accompanying the proposal of a 53 lot single family detached residential conservation subdivision with the proposed | 00:02:49 | |
| density of 3.17 dwellings per. | 00:02:53 | |
| Acres with 116,348.76 square feet of right away. | 00:02:58 | |
| And 250. | 00:03:03 | |
| 6000 square feet of open space. | 00:03:04 | |
| The first half comments the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan because as | 00:03:07 | |
| this is intended as a conservation subdivision. | 00:03:11 | |
| The proposal meets the vision for growth. | 00:03:15 | |
| Growth areas by locating development in close proximity to both sanitary sewers and. | 00:03:17 | |
| Primary arterial transportation corridors. | 00:03:21 | |
| While preserving natural features. | 00:03:24 | |
| This is in line with the principles of smart growth by having smaller lots which require less infrastructure per unit. | 00:03:26 | |
| For the community to maintain and is in line with the conservation development designs associated with Randall Arendt, author of | 00:03:31 | |
| Rural by Design, which is on page 41 of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:03:35 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the current conditions and the character of current structures. | 00:03:40 | |
| And uses in the area because other single family residential developments occur just to the north of the site with Sandy Acres | 00:03:46 | |
| Plat 789 and Woodridge Farm. | 00:03:50 | |
| Plot 1285. | 00:03:54 | |
| To the West with Cherry Grove at 1193 and to the east with Pear Ridge. | 00:03:55 | |
| Flat 1053 just West of Gary Cabin Park is another conservation subdivision. | 00:03:59 | |
| That was approved in 2024. | 00:04:04 | |
| Further up Hwy. 62 within the Edwardsville Gateway District are other single family and multi family residential developments. | 00:04:06 | |
| Further, as a conservation subdivision, this development would intentionally preserve contiguous portions of the existing tree | 00:04:12 | |
| canopy and landscape. | 00:04:15 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land. As this is intended as a conservation | 00:04:21 | |
| subdivision, it will provide an alternative. | 00:04:25 | |
| An alternative housing option to the county while preserving natural features. | 00:04:29 | |
| The smart growth visions outlined in the Comprehensive Plan encourage A compact building design, creating a range of housing | 00:04:33 | |
| opportunities and choices. | 00:04:36 | |
| And preservation of open space and natural beauty. | 00:04:39 | |
| Further development should be encouraged to concentrate in areas with sanitary sewer access and in proximity to primary arterial | 00:04:42 | |
| transportation corridors. | 00:04:45 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be injurious to the value of other properties in the area because the conservation | 00:04:50 | |
| subdivision will preserve 41.9% of the development as usable recreation and open space or retain natural features. | 00:04:56 | |
| The constructed homes are intended to be built to a housing price comparable to other newly constructed homes in the area. | 00:05:02 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development in the area because, as this is accompanied | 00:05:09 | |
| by a conservation subdivision, the proposed rezoning follows smart growth principles and is consistent with the county planning | 00:05:13 | |
| documents and nearby land uses such as Gary E Cavan Park. | 00:05:18 | |
| The Edwardsville Gateway District and residential uses. | 00:05:22 | |
| Adequate infrastructure is available nearby and can be brought to the properties. | 00:05:25 | |
| Staff Recommendations Favorable recommendation contingent on the approval of the Conservation subdivision proposed. | 00:05:28 | |
| For the. | 00:05:36 | |
| Docket for the actual Conservation subdivision. | 00:05:37 | |
| The petitioner is seeking approval of conservation subdivision to be known as Maplewood Crossing. | 00:05:41 | |
| The proposal will consolidate 2 parcels totaling 16.682 acres and 253 lots at 6000 square feet for each lot totaling 354,319 | 00:05:45 | |
| square feet for the developable area. | 00:05:50 | |
| Service by the proposed Maplewood Dr. | 00:05:56 | |
| A 50 foot right away consisting. | 00:05:58 | |
| Or containing 116,348.76 square feet. | 00:06:00 | |
| With an open space containing the remaining 256,000 square feet. Intended to preserve natural features at the site. | 00:06:04 | |
| Meeting the conservation subdivision requirements, the property will also have a recreation area containing and I apologize and my | 00:06:10 | |
| staff report I have updated information after the plaque committee. This was updated to 2 acres. | 00:06:15 | |
| Including the storm water retention area as a current pond that would be retained. | 00:06:21 | |
| The developer will provide a horseboard, fence, row and landscaping along Hwy. 62. | 00:06:25 | |
| Running along the southern border of the development. | 00:06:30 | |
| The property is located within the transitional residential land use of the Georgetown Township as described by the 2017 | 00:06:32 | |
| Comprehensive Plan on page 47. | 00:06:36 | |
| The same section encourages conservation subdivisions and residential development to be located within residential growth areas. | 00:06:40 | |
| Which is defined on page 41 as areas with proximity to adequate infrastructure and public services. | 00:06:46 | |
| This proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to service letters from the local public services and under the traffic count | 00:06:51 | |
| required to obtain a traffic study. | 00:06:54 | |
| While this section does call out that higher density development should be discouraged in transitional areas, higher density is | 00:06:59 | |
| defined as eight or more dwellings per acre, whereas this proposal is only 3.17 dwellings per acre. | 00:07:05 | |
| Adjoining properties to the West are a stretch of rural residential properties along the inline lane. | 00:07:11 | |
| To the east of the property are more rural residential properties along State Route 62. | 00:07:15 | |
| With the Edwardsville Trace Apartments just past those to the north are the platted subdivisions of Sandy Acres and Woodbridge | 00:07:20 | |
| Farm. | 00:07:23 | |
| Both zoned rural residential and just to their W is Gary Cabin Park. | 00:07:27 | |
| South of the property on the opposite side of State Road 62, our stretch of conforming and non conforming residential lots in the | 00:07:32 | |
| Agricultural Residential zoning district. | 00:07:36 | |
| Where are the conservation subdivision density standards? The base density calculation is the net square footage divided by the | 00:07:41 | |
| base zoning district lot size for the development. | 00:07:44 | |
| The current base zone for the proposal is rural residential, allowing 16 units. | 00:07:48 | |
| With the rezone to residential suburban, this would allow a base density of 50.86 units. | 00:07:52 | |
| The petitioner is also pursuing a 5% density bonus by meeting the requirement to provide a fence row along State Road 62. | 00:07:57 | |
| Bringing the density up to 53.4 rounded down. 53 units allowed. | 00:08:04 | |
| A plat review and a neighborhood meeting were held on March 4th for this development. | 00:08:08 | |
| I've also provided A signet sheet. | 00:08:12 | |
| The petitioner has provided A compliant preliminary plan for the project, including a preliminary plat. The petitioner has | 00:08:15 | |
| provided certification that all drainage and. | 00:08:19 | |
| Environmental requirements will be complied with and that there are no known outstanding issues concerning item. | 00:08:23 | |
| A geotechnical report is not required for this property. Traffic study is not deemed necessary as this would be under the 75 peak | 00:08:28 | |
| power trips. | 00:08:31 | |
| Phase one environmental study was not required. | 00:08:35 | |
| Lots meet the size and frontage standards of the FCZ Sorry County zoning ordinance for residential suburban in a conservation | 00:08:38 | |
| subdivision and are laid out along subdivision streets compliant with. | 00:08:43 | |
| The subdivision control ordinance standards. | 00:08:49 | |
| Maplewood Dr. Is. | 00:08:51 | |
| Proposed as the subdivision St. connecting to State Road 62, which still needs. | 00:08:52 | |
| Actually, we have received the INDOT approval. | 00:08:57 | |
| That is placed on the. | 00:09:00 | |
| On the desk as well. | 00:09:01 | |
| Petitioner has indicated that sidewalks will be provided and the connection is required. | 00:09:07 | |
| By the subdivision control ordinance to connect to the recreation area provided. | 00:09:11 | |
| Certification to ME county drainage and stormwater standards. | 00:09:16 | |
| Has been provided and final approval drainage plans are required prior to secondary approval. | 00:09:19 | |
| And the petitioner has provided willingness to serve letters from Edwardsville Water Authority, the Floyd County Fire Territory, | 00:09:23 | |
| Harrison RMC, Duke Energy and Georgetown sewers. | 00:09:28 | |
| Wastewater will be provided by Georgetown sewers. | 00:09:32 | |
| As staff recommendations, final approval of drainage stormwater plans and an update to. | 00:09:35 | |
| The entrance were required prior to secondary approval. That update to the entrance is reflected on the new. | 00:09:40 | |
| The new platform. | 00:09:45 | |
| That's in place on your own. | 00:09:47 | |
| That's that's all. I have those options. | 00:09:48 | |
| OK, I got a question. | 00:09:53 | |
| You, you said the traffic study wasn't done because of what was, what's the, what's that right? | 00:09:56 | |
| There is a certain. | 00:10:01 | |
| Peak hour trips if they're under that amount. | 00:10:06 | |
| Then a traffic study is not. | 00:10:10 | |
| OK, I thought it was based on lots. | 00:10:12 | |
| It's not based on our. | 00:10:14 | |
| OK, that's good. | 00:10:16 | |
| And then? | 00:10:17 | |
| This is a zone change, correct? | 00:10:19 | |
| Yes, first a zone change and then a conservation right, But this has to go in front of the commissioners for approval. That | 00:10:21 | |
| correct, correct. | 00:10:25 | |
| OK. All right. | 00:10:30 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:10:32 | |
| OK this time. | 00:10:38 | |
| No questions. All right. Thanks, Frank. | 00:10:39 | |
| OK, at this time the petitioner come up in. | 00:10:41 | |
| For the instructions on the board, we give him 10 minutes. | 00:10:47 | |
| Starting now. | 00:10:53 | |
| What's your name? Thank you. | 00:10:55 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:10:59 | |
| Thank you. | 00:11:01 | |
| Trees, trees, trees. | 00:11:06 | |
| You already lost 3. | 00:11:10 | |
| 3 trees. | 00:11:12 | |
| I just thought that I was in the store this year. I just thought that. | 00:11:19 | |
| Good evening, Jason Copper, Wave, Primavera and Associates, 1000 Bell Lane at New Albany IN here representing Discovery builders | 00:11:24 | |
| and developers. | 00:11:28 | |
| With discovery are Alex Minnick and Ethan Ammon. | 00:11:32 | |
| Also with me is Eric Martin. Some representatives from the family who own the property are here as well. | 00:11:36 | |
| Arensberger family in the back. | 00:11:42 | |
| In the back there. | 00:11:44 | |
| The first slide I showed you is the is an aerial of of the vicinity. | 00:11:47 | |
| And the site is indicated in the yellow dash. | 00:11:52 | |
| Dashes. | 00:11:54 | |
| You see it's on the north side of State Road 62. | 00:11:56 | |
| Just West of its intersection with Unawine Lane. | 00:11:58 | |
| As you can see, Gary Caven Park is to the northwest. Edwardsville Trace Apartments or. | 00:12:02 | |
| Couple properties to the West. | 00:12:06 | |
| Just southwest of Poly Freeze. | 00:12:08 | |
| The next side, this is the zoning map for the for the area. | 00:12:12 | |
| See Edwardsville traces our plan year development. | 00:12:15 | |
| Gary Cavan is a. | 00:12:18 | |
| Park. | 00:12:19 | |
| I think. | 00:12:20 | |
| I thought there was a zone change for that of the conservation subdivision to the northwest. | 00:12:21 | |
| Again, the site is indicated in the yellow dashed lines. | 00:12:26 | |
| The request would be to. | 00:12:31 | |
| Change the zone from RR to Rs. | 00:12:32 | |
| And I will read these justifications. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plans vision for growth areas by locating | 00:12:35 | |
| higher density subdivisions. | 00:12:39 | |
| In close proximity to both sanitary sewers. | 00:12:43 | |
| And primary arterial transportation corridors. | 00:12:46 | |
| Following the precepts for smart growth. | 00:12:49 | |
| State Road 62 is considered a. | 00:12:51 | |
| If not a major correct collector, IA minor arterial. | 00:12:54 | |
| And we do have sanitary sewers to the site. | 00:12:59 | |
| Smaller lot sizes should be considered in these areas if connected to sanitary sewers. | 00:13:02 | |
| And associated with conservation development design proposed. | 00:13:06 | |
| In the styles associated with Randall Aaron. | 00:13:09 | |
| And I'll get to that. | 00:13:12 | |
| I'll get to that shortly. | 00:13:13 | |
| The proposed use of single family residential is consistent with the current conditions of the area. | 00:13:14 | |
| The area consists of single family residential to the east. | 00:13:19 | |
| North-south and an existing multi family residential planning development to the West. | 00:13:22 | |
| The rezoning of the property will be necessary for the most desirable land use. | 00:13:27 | |
| The comprehensive plan outlines smart growth visions. | 00:13:30 | |
| Objective and policies. | 00:13:33 | |
| For higher density developments located along major arterial corridors. | 00:13:35 | |
| Buffer areas have been provided on all. | 00:13:39 | |
| By bordering property lines to the adjoining neighbors. | 00:13:41 | |
| And by clustering the development. | 00:13:45 | |
| It will allow for the pond area to remain. | 00:13:47 | |
| In an active. | 00:13:49 | |
| I should say recreational setting. | 00:13:51 | |
| The rezoning will not be injurious to the value of other properties in the area. | 00:13:54 | |
| The conservation subdivision design will provide clustered single family residential homes. | 00:13:57 | |
| Allowing for 41.8% of the development. | 00:14:02 | |
| To remain as usable. | 00:14:05 | |
| Recreational open space. | 00:14:07 | |
| And housing pricing comparable to other new construction homes in the area. | 00:14:09 | |
| High density residential land use will be directed toward existing infrastructure. | 00:14:13 | |
| And near existing residential uses. | 00:14:17 | |
| The Georgetown Township provides opportunities for conservation subdivision design. | 00:14:19 | |
| Utilizing smart growth to allow for compatibility and uses. | 00:14:23 | |
| Along a major arterial corridor. | 00:14:27 | |
| The next slide shows. | 00:14:30 | |
| Sort of a colored. | 00:14:32 | |
| Rendering of the site. | 00:14:33 | |
| The yellow are the are the lots. | 00:14:35 | |
| The lots are proposed to be in conformance with your RU standard, which is 50 by 120. | 00:14:37 | |
| As allowed under the conservation regime. | 00:14:43 | |
| The green spaces are. | 00:14:46 | |
| Outside the right of way would be open space. | 00:14:48 | |
| And the mustard colored would be the recreational. | 00:14:50 | |
| Open space. | 00:14:54 | |
| You can see the proposed signage. | 00:14:55 | |
| In the lower right hand corner there. | 00:14:58 | |
| It is all single family detached residential. There's no attached. | 00:14:59 | |
| That's all. Same family detached. | 00:15:03 | |
| Next slide. | 00:15:05 | |
| This is the density calculation allowed under your ordinance for conservation subdivision. | 00:15:08 | |
| So. | 00:15:13 | |
| Contingent upon the zone change, we're proposing 53 single family lots. | 00:15:14 | |
| They would have 20 foot front yard setbacks, 5 foot side yards, 10 foot rears. | 00:15:19 | |
| When you take the gross square footage. | 00:15:24 | |
| Divided by the by right Rs. | 00:15:26 | |
| That yields 50.86 lots. | 00:15:28 | |
| And then we can we're using the. | 00:15:33 | |
| The protecting county view shed from a road density bonus. | 00:15:36 | |
| Which allows up to 5% density bonus. | 00:15:40 | |
| That's where we get to the 53.4 lots. | 00:15:43 | |
| And then we're obviously using the. | 00:15:46 | |
| 3 So with the developers proposing is a horse board fence. | 00:15:48 | |
| Along the State Road 62 right of way. | 00:15:51 | |
| That would be landscaped as well. | 00:15:54 | |
| Which would perfect protect that view shed from from Hwy. 62 from through traffic. | 00:15:56 | |
| As well as to protect the view of the backyards. | 00:16:01 | |
| Of those houses that would be facing. | 00:16:04 | |
| 62 plus the green space that we're leaving there. | 00:16:06 | |
| The open space requirement is is 35%. | 00:16:10 | |
| We're actually providing 41.8. | 00:16:14 | |
| Overall green space. | 00:16:16 | |
| And then 22 acres for 34.2% of the green space is required to be. | 00:16:17 | |
| It could. I think it says public recreation space. | 00:16:25 | |
| So the intent there would be to rehab the existing pond that's there. | 00:16:27 | |
| We're going to use that pond as our detention basin. | 00:16:31 | |
| But we're going to keep it as. | 00:16:33 | |
| As a lake. | 00:16:36 | |
| For an amenity feature. | 00:16:37 | |
| And there would be walking trails. | 00:16:39 | |
| Benches, those kind of things in that. | 00:16:40 | |
| Public recreational areas. | 00:16:42 | |
| Let's see. | 00:16:44 | |
| Next slide Discovery is a well established company. They've been around since. | 00:16:47 | |
| 1992. | 00:16:51 | |
| You can see a list of other projects that they've done and you Albany. | 00:16:53 | |
| Bridal Wood. Muirfield. Trinity Run. | 00:16:56 | |
| Windsor Creek. | 00:16:59 | |
| In Charlestown, they've done Hawthorne, Glen Hux Landing. | 00:17:01 | |
| Henryville Champions Point. | 00:17:05 | |
| A heavy Commons in Jeffersonville. | 00:17:09 | |
| Crown Chase. Plum Run. | 00:17:11 | |
| And West Monaco run in solid burn. | 00:17:14 | |
| So it is a well established firm. | 00:17:16 | |
| The next slide you can see examples of their other projects. | 00:17:18 | |
| The sides of buildings finish the finishes within a whole. | 00:17:22 | |
| They're a very, again, a very high quality builder. | 00:17:26 | |
| So, so the last slide for smart growth. | 00:17:31 | |
| Your ordinance, your stormwater ordinance, is very stringent. | 00:17:35 | |
| And obviously we have to. | 00:17:39 | |
| Comply with that and Chief. | 00:17:40 | |
| Achieve approval of the stormwater plan. | 00:17:43 | |
| Prior to any development of the site. | 00:17:46 | |
| So storm water and drainage control would comply with the Floyd County storm water ordinance. | 00:17:48 | |
| Sanitary sewer connections would comply with the requirements of Georgetown Utilities. | 00:17:52 | |
| I understand there's some concern in in Woodbridge. | 00:17:56 | |
| Would bridge with this the way their sewers are? We'll need to work with the town of Georgetown town. | 00:18:00 | |
| Obviously make sure we're not making that any worse than it is. | 00:18:04 | |
| Maybe that will help. | 00:18:07 | |
| Help alleviate any problems that those residents are having. | 00:18:09 | |
| The proposal adheres to the Comprehensive. | 00:18:12 | |
| Planned goals and visions for growth areas within the county. | 00:18:15 | |
| The Georgetown Township provides opportunity for conservation subdivision design utilizing smart growth to allow for compatibility | 00:18:19 | |
| and uses along. | 00:18:22 | |
| The 62 corridor. | 00:18:25 | |
| The proposed use of single family residential is consistent with current conditions. | 00:18:28 | |
| Of the area. | 00:18:32 | |
| And with that, we'd be happy to answer any questions. | 00:18:33 | |
| Yeah, Jason, you were. | 00:18:36 | |
| Uh, at the meeting we had. | 00:18:39 | |
| Technical Review. | 00:18:41 | |
| Yes. | 00:18:43 | |
| You were thinking that, Sir, is. | 00:18:43 | |
| On a different. | 00:18:45 | |
| Pressure line correct? I don't know the answer to that I think. | 00:18:46 | |
| Typically when Georgetown develops, especially out in these areas, they're putting in low pressure sewers. | 00:18:51 | |
| Woodbridge may have originally been. | 00:18:57 | |
| Approved on septic. | 00:19:00 | |
| In which case they may have actually. | 00:19:01 | |
| So. | 00:19:03 | |
| There's a there's a Lips station at Edwardsville Trace that we designed. | 00:19:04 | |
| That pumps along the back of Woodbridge and out to the system in Porter Ridge Rd. | 00:19:07 | |
| Georgetown system. | 00:19:13 | |
| They may have allowed people to tie in Woodbridge to tie into that force main. I don't know the answer to that. | 00:19:15 | |
| If so, it might be a mix, it might be an incompatible. | 00:19:21 | |
| System because I don't know. | 00:19:24 | |
| Edwardsville Trace is what I would call a high pressure system. It's a lift station force main. | 00:19:28 | |
| In Woodbridge. | 00:19:33 | |
| If they're using the low pressure system. | 00:19:34 | |
| It may not be meshing, but we'll we'll have to work with Georgetown to figure that out. | 00:19:37 | |
| So we obviously. | 00:19:40 | |
| My clients have no desire to flood anyone's house either from. | 00:19:42 | |
| Stormwater or from sanitary sewers. | 00:19:46 | |
| But but. | 00:19:49 | |
| And as I explained in the neighborhood meeting. | 00:19:50 | |
| The development process is sort of a chicken and the egg. | 00:19:52 | |
| Thing. | 00:19:55 | |
| Our clients can't spend a lot of money solving other people's problems. | 00:19:56 | |
| Until they have approval. | 00:19:59 | |
| Right. | 00:20:01 | |
| So we need, we need to get past this meeting. | 00:20:01 | |
| And then we'll have to get a sanitary sewer permit. | 00:20:04 | |
| Stormwater permits all of those things. | 00:20:07 | |
| Before we could turn a blade. | 00:20:09 | |
| A spoonful of dirt on the side. | 00:20:11 | |
| We'll have to have all those approvals in place. | 00:20:13 | |
| And certainly before they could build a house. | 00:20:15 | |
| And then we would come back. | 00:20:18 | |
| To staff for secondary approval once we have all those things in place. | 00:20:20 | |
| So, umm. | 00:20:23 | |
| This is just the first step. | 00:20:24 | |
| And many things that we have to accomplish before we can actually. | 00:20:26 | |
| Develop the site. | 00:20:28 | |
| The roads, they'll, they'll be public, right? Dedicated to the county, yes. | 00:20:32 | |
| OK. And then one other question as far as the exterior of these. | 00:20:37 | |
| Are we talking a lot of violin? We talking? | 00:20:41 | |
| Hardy board we talked and brick. What are we talking about? So little to no vinyl. | 00:20:44 | |
| Sure. No, Yeah, please. | 00:20:50 | |
| Because we've approved some stuff and we go by afterwards and it's like all final. It's so embarrassing so. | 00:20:53 | |
| My name is Ethan. I'm the director of operations for Discovery. They will be brick and Hardy material. | 00:20:59 | |
| 01801 Augusta Blvd. You better say Sir to you. | 00:21:05 | |
| The only time we would use final would be a vinyl shake product and a Gable that looks just like a hearty shake product. But as | 00:21:11 | |
| far as the four sides of the home, thank you. Brick or stuff. | 00:21:16 | |
| Yep. | 00:21:23 | |
| All right. Any other questions for? | 00:21:25 | |
| The petitioner. Thank you, Jason. | 00:21:27 | |
| Thank you. Yeah. All right. At this time, we'll open up. | 00:21:29 | |
| The floor to anybody like to speak in? | 00:21:32 | |
| In favor of this project. | 00:21:35 | |
| Came forward please. | 00:21:38 | |
| We have 10 minutes allotted for you. Can you talk that long? | 00:21:40 | |
| State your name and your address. For the record, yes, my name is David Ernst Berger. | 00:21:48 | |
| And of course, I represent the family. | 00:21:53 | |
| There's eleven of us, you know, so there's quite a few. | 00:21:57 | |
| You know I my actual my address is 1118 Ross, Trevor Circle, Louisville, KY. | 00:22:01 | |
| OK. Thank you. | 00:22:07 | |
| So I'm not going to say much. It won't take 10 minutes. | 00:22:09 | |
| Umm, other than. | 00:22:12 | |
| You know, we could have gone with a developer that was in. | 00:22:14 | |
| A national, you know, developer. | 00:22:17 | |
| We didn't want that. | 00:22:20 | |
| No one in the family wanted that. | 00:22:22 | |
| We wanted somebody we felt like was a quality. | 00:22:25 | |
| Builder in this community. | 00:22:28 | |
| That knew the community and his name. | 00:22:30 | |
| On what the products and the communities they they build. | 00:22:33 | |
| And we feel like we. | 00:22:39 | |
| Have that. | 00:22:40 | |
| With this development group. | 00:22:42 | |
| Were highly in favor of the. | 00:22:45 | |
| Conservation, easement or conservation? | 00:22:48 | |
| Style of development. | 00:22:51 | |
| 40% of. | 00:22:54 | |
| Green space was really important to the family. | 00:22:55 | |
| And so we feel like this is going to be a good development. | 00:23:00 | |
| A brother of ours lives in. | 00:23:05 | |
| You know, a home. | 00:23:08 | |
| By this developer. | 00:23:09 | |
| It's quality home. | 00:23:11 | |
| It's about the same comparable size and price. | 00:23:13 | |
| What's going to be put in here? | 00:23:16 | |
| So. | 00:23:18 | |
| We. | 00:23:19 | |
| You know, wanted to let you know that the whole family does. | 00:23:20 | |
| In fact, favor. | 00:23:23 | |
| This development. | 00:23:24 | |
| And these developers? | 00:23:26 | |
| So. | 00:23:28 | |
| How long is your family on that property? | 00:23:28 | |
| Oh goodness, 1959, is that right? | 00:23:31 | |
| You're gonna be there when they start excavation. Be sure they don't dig up anything you buried. | 00:23:33 | |
| So anyway, they they promise to keep a lot of trees and that's what we want. | 00:23:42 | |
| Thank you. | 00:23:47 | |
| OK. Anybody else would like to speak in favor come forward? | 00:23:50 | |
| Last call. | 00:23:56 | |
| All right, at this time we turn it over to anybody that wants to speak in opposition. | 00:23:57 | |
| Of the project. | 00:24:02 | |
| Come forward. | 00:24:03 | |
| State your name. | 00:24:06 | |
| And your address. | 00:24:08 | |
| My name's Joe Ruttle. I live at 963 Unawan Lane. | 00:24:13 | |
| I have two acres of property there. | 00:24:17 | |
| And it borders. | 00:24:19 | |
| What they're building right now. | 00:24:21 | |
| Just a slow footnote. | 00:24:23 | |
| The the meeting, the informational meeting that was Wednesday last week. | 00:24:25 | |
| I got my notice Monday for that meeting. I've not got one for this. I know what's going on. | 00:24:29 | |
| But I've not gotten any paperwork on it to see. | 00:24:34 | |
| What they're doing, I ain't got nothing. | 00:24:36 | |
| I did get a letter in mail on the day I was home. | 00:24:38 | |
| And they didn't give it to me or they didn't come up to my house. But I, I just want to let you know I've not received nothing. | 00:24:41 | |
| And you did state your name. I'm sorry. I was talking to the attorney. You stated your name and address. Joseph Brooke. | 00:24:46 | |
| 963 you know online OK sorry we just want to make sure that if you're not getting noticed that you. | 00:24:51 | |
| You need to be sure you're on. I've got one of them but it was 2 days before the meeting and I didn't get nothing for this. | 00:24:57 | |
| OK, OK. | 00:25:02 | |
| I know I can't stop progress but I'm telling y'all. | 00:25:04 | |
| Water comes across my property like there's no tomorrow, right? It washes me out and. | 00:25:07 | |
| It all started. | 00:25:13 | |
| Honest goodness when he put the apartments in. | 00:25:14 | |
| Yeah, down the road. | 00:25:16 | |
| Well, let me let me make you feel uncomfortable because I won't tell you, Mr. Cooperate stated this. | 00:25:17 | |
| Floyd County has these strictest. | 00:25:23 | |
| Storm water. | 00:25:26 | |
| Requirements. | 00:25:27 | |
| It's bigger than Louisville, KY MSD. | 00:25:28 | |
| And they usually I will tell you 9 times out 10. | 00:25:31 | |
| Now this is when they get done. | 00:25:34 | |
| I'm not talking about existing situation. | 00:25:36 | |
| But when they get done, you'll have. | 00:25:38 | |
| Less water coming from that property than what was coming from the property now. So I'd like to give you some pictures I got from | 00:25:40 | |
| my driveway. Welcome but it but we this is this. | 00:25:44 | |
| This doesn't really. | 00:25:49 | |
| We appreciate that, but I guarantee you. All right, thank you. | 00:25:50 | |
| What we want to do? | 00:25:54 | |
| Any number to the record, all right. | 00:25:55 | |
| Totally. | 00:25:58 | |
| It worse is my problem. I mean it just it's, it's gotten worse. I've been there 30 years. | 00:25:59 | |
| I used to have a ditch. | 00:26:04 | |
| That I could step across. | 00:26:05 | |
| Now I'm, no, I'm over, but I can't run a jump across it now, right? It just gets bigger and bigger and it keeps the road in my | 00:26:07 | |
| property more and more every time. | 00:26:11 | |
| And it comes right through the middle of my property. | 00:26:15 | |
| Well, we'll have Mr. Cochran wait when he comes back up to address your concerns, if you don't mind, We'll do that. | 00:26:17 | |
| And then? | 00:26:23 | |
| Like I said, the fact that I didn't get the notice in this meeting. | 00:26:25 | |
| Was kind of my other neighbors have and they've told me about it, right? | 00:26:28 | |
| And then we're glad you're here. | 00:26:32 | |
| Yeah. And and I, I would like to and I heard some of the percentages without seeing it on the map. | 00:26:35 | |
| 50 The runoff first of all from. | 00:26:41 | |
| Two houses is going to be a lot. | 00:26:43 | |
| That's a lot of water with it. | 00:26:46 | |
| Roofs and roads. | 00:26:48 | |
| And it's all coming towards me. | 00:26:50 | |
| And then once it leaves me. | 00:26:51 | |
| It crosses, you know, 1. | 00:26:53 | |
| And I can't. | 00:26:55 | |
| State for a fact, but I've talked to the county. | 00:26:56 | |
| The Park Highway department down there and there's a new guy in there now, but the previous guy said. | 00:26:59 | |
| That the strains is there now it's not big enough. | 00:27:03 | |
| To cross the road, it goes up over the road. | 00:27:06 | |
| Right when? | 00:27:08 | |
| On heavy rains, but it goes over the road on two or three different places. | 00:27:09 | |
| So that's my biggest concern. | 00:27:14 | |
| Well, we thank it and we'll have Mr. Copper weight address that on the train. It's for you. | 00:27:16 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:27:20 | |
| Definitely not boring. | 00:27:21 | |
| Next Gordon. | 00:27:23 | |
| I understand it. | 00:27:25 | |
| I just want to confirm that we do have a receipt that it was mailed. | 00:27:26 | |
| Whether it was delivered is really up to the post office, OK. | 00:27:35 | |
| All right, all right, next. | 00:27:39 | |
| In opposition in my left. | 00:27:44 | |
| You can do it man. | 00:27:50 | |
| It don't take anything really just. | 00:27:52 | |
| Just state your name and address. My name is Andrew Fulkerson. I live at 865. | 00:27:55 | |
| You know, one lane. | 00:28:01 | |
| The back of that neighborhood. | 00:28:03 | |
| Our potential neighborhood would be the. | 00:28:06 | |
| Side back of my property. | 00:28:09 | |
| There is. | 00:28:12 | |
| Trees that. | 00:28:13 | |
| I'm pretty much bored and. | 00:28:15 | |
| I have a shop back there and I keep my camper and stuff and. | 00:28:17 | |
| My only concern is. | 00:28:21 | |
| If we open all that up. | 00:28:25 | |
| Potential for vandalism. | 00:28:28 | |
| People still on my things. | 00:28:30 | |
| I just don't like. | 00:28:33 | |
| No one. It's that open. It's kind of probably the way I have it right now and I feel protected. | 00:28:35 | |
| And I just. | 00:28:41 | |
| Don't want vandalism or kids coming back there or getting hurt on my property. | 00:28:43 | |
| I have little ones and I'm just worried about some kid coming back there and getting hurt. | 00:28:47 | |
| So if I could hear of some type of. | 00:28:52 | |
| Way they could keep. | 00:28:56 | |
| Somebody from getting hurt or if they put a fence back there or something. | 00:28:58 | |
| I'd be happy with it. | 00:29:02 | |
| But it's. | 00:29:04 | |
| I'm worried about the safety. | 00:29:05 | |
| More than anything. | 00:29:07 | |
| Thank you. All right. Thank you, Sir. | 00:29:09 | |
| Come forward, Mr. Barley. | 00:29:16 | |
| Steve Byerly, 872 Yenawine Lane, Georgetown, IN. | 00:29:24 | |
| I kind of feel we're seeing. | 00:29:31 | |
| I kind of feel like I don't want to. | 00:29:34 | |
| Jump on. | 00:29:36 | |
| The wagon here and say I'm against it. | 00:29:38 | |
| Because I. | 00:29:42 | |
| Probably be a hypocrite. | 00:29:43 | |
| I've I've probably built more of these subdivisions or helped build more of these subdivisions and. | 00:29:46 | |
| The wealth, in fact, they know I work for Dan Christianity back in the year today. | 00:29:50 | |
| 43 years so I've I've seen him go in. | 00:29:55 | |
| I know how they go in and how they go out. | 00:29:58 | |
| I am concerned about the water. | 00:30:02 | |
| But. | 00:30:04 | |
| I know. I know how that works. I know how it. | 00:30:05 | |
| I know how. | 00:30:11 | |
| How they? | 00:30:12 | |
| The drainage. | 00:30:12 | |
| It's supposed to work. | 00:30:13 | |
| Now, and, and I, in fact, I'm probably going to be the inspector on this job. | 00:30:15 | |
| Because. | 00:30:20 | |
| I'm below. | 00:30:22 | |
| Joe So I get. | 00:30:23 | |
| I'll get I get a lot of water. | 00:30:25 | |
| But the county you know, you know it has nothing to do with probably, probably with the Herst burgers on that property other than. | 00:30:27 | |
| I hope that we don't get. | 00:30:35 | |
| Have that problem but county has not. | 00:30:36 | |
| Address the problem of the of the drainage. | 00:30:41 | |
| But that's that's not your problem. | 00:30:43 | |
| I mean, that's that's not so. | 00:30:46 | |
| I I just want and and the traffic. | 00:30:49 | |
| Yes, horse traffic's bad. | 00:30:51 | |
| Everywhere. | 00:30:53 | |
| So I can't. | 00:30:54 | |
| I can't show you this. I can't say that it's going to get it would be worse back. | 00:30:56 | |
| And that is a high traffic area and it's had a lot of accidents there. | 00:31:01 | |
| Frank, I think, you know, there's a lot of accidents out that way, so. | 00:31:06 | |
| I'm just gonna leave it at that because. | 00:31:10 | |
| They're I cleaned their pond out. | 00:31:13 | |
| I clear youth falls in pond out years ago so I know what's in there and there will be a lot of turtles in there. | 00:31:17 | |
| All right, thank. Thank you, Steve. | 00:31:23 | |
| Alrighty. | 00:31:27 | |
| I do have one question. | 00:31:30 | |
| You can come up, just state your name and address for the record again. So we got you. | 00:31:32 | |
| Jose Joseph Rattle, you know my mind. | 00:31:38 | |
| So if it does, if it does get approved. | 00:31:40 | |
| Are there going to be like they work on it? | 00:31:43 | |
| They're gonna have hours where they work. | 00:31:45 | |
| You know, like. | 00:31:47 | |
| 8:00 to 4:30 not. | 00:31:48 | |
| Rundown so I hear Bulldogs at 10:00 night. | 00:31:50 | |
| I've done part of the other side that isn't about my girlfriends right next to the park. | 00:31:53 | |
| I've heard him over there. | 00:31:57 | |
| And on weekends, are they going to be running? | 00:31:59 | |
| Putting the streets in stuff they're going to be. | 00:32:02 | |
| Probably just Tuesdays and Thursdays between 10:00 and 2:00. | 00:32:04 | |
| Sets the tea schedule. | 00:32:10 | |
| I just I mean, you're gonna. | 00:32:12 | |
| I just can't come out there on Saturday and Sunday and. | 00:32:14 | |
| I'd say that whatever if county does have some kind of ordinance, they'll have to abide by the ordinance is what I would say. I, I | 00:32:17 | |
| don't, and I don't know what that is, I'll be honest with you. | 00:32:21 | |
| Yeah, but it's noted. | 00:32:25 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:32:27 | |
| There is a noise ordinance, but it does not include construction. There you go. | 00:32:28 | |
| Amen. | 00:32:33 | |
| My name is John Berry. It's Barrie. | 00:32:39 | |
| I own a property at 887 Yenawine. | 00:32:43 | |
| I'm not pro or. | 00:32:46 | |
| Against. | 00:32:48 | |
| Because I don't like information. | 00:32:49 | |
| I never got the 1st. | 00:32:51 | |
| Cutter for the first informational meeting. | 00:32:52 | |
| I got this one. | 00:32:56 | |
| And when the first general was speaking. | 00:32:57 | |
| He kept saying next slide, next slide. These monitors never changed. | 00:33:00 | |
| So I have no idea what he was looking at. | 00:33:04 | |
| Or we was, you know, talking to. | 00:33:06 | |
| Just for the record. | 00:33:08 | |
| The the rainwater. | 00:33:11 | |
| Stormwater drains for everywhere to call it. | 00:33:12 | |
| Is an issue. It's a major issue. | 00:33:15 | |
| And a lot of driveways along that, the yellow line. | 00:33:17 | |
| Path there. | 00:33:21 | |
| Are cracked up and broken because of this. | 00:33:22 | |
| Transition. | 00:33:26 | |
| So I'm just looking For more information to look at. Like I said, not pro, not against. | 00:33:29 | |
| The trees Outback are nice. | 00:33:35 | |
| It's it's a great scenery and. | 00:33:38 | |
| I just need more information, more communication. | 00:33:41 | |
| Understand what the plan is. | 00:33:44 | |
| Going forward. | 00:33:47 | |
| So I'll leave it at that. | 00:33:48 | |
| So I'll give you something. This is yours. | 00:33:51 | |
| If the water issue Steve. | 00:33:55 | |
| Steve, is the water issue. | 00:33:59 | |
| The whole length of Vienna wine. | 00:34:03 | |
| Or is it halfway so I can have somebody go out there and look? | 00:34:06 | |
| Yeah, well, not full blank because. | 00:34:13 | |
| Once it gets down to card. | 00:34:15 | |
| Right. So between Cordon Ridge. | 00:34:17 | |
| Between Cordon Ridge and 62 is where I should have them look at it. | 00:34:20 | |
| I'll, I'll have the engineer go out there with stormwater Guy and look at it. | 00:34:24 | |
| Let's see if we can dig a big hole or something. | 00:34:30 | |
| I know you're good. | 00:34:35 | |
| Alright, we still got a few minutes left. Or is it difficult time out we time down. | 00:34:39 | |
| OK, All right. Was there anybody else that wants to speak in opposition? | 00:34:43 | |
| If you make it fast, I'll let you come. If not, we'll close it. | 00:34:47 | |
| That's it. We can't let Mr. Copperweight, you want to come up and give us a 5 minutes rebuttal and. | 00:34:50 | |
| I guess what I want to hear is. | 00:34:55 | |
| Definitely your response on the drainage for sure. Want to hear that and then I'd like to hear. | 00:34:57 | |
| What kind of buffer they're thinking about maybe coming up with for the I think that was, was that Mister Fulbers who said that? | 00:35:02 | |
| Yeah, Mr. Focus. So, So on the drainage, as I mentioned earlier, Boyd County has the most stringent drainage ordinance around. | 00:35:09 | |
| But what we have to do is show that we are not increasing. | 00:35:17 | |
| From this project. | 00:35:20 | |
| We are not increasing. | 00:35:22 | |
| Post development. | 00:35:24 | |
| Runoff. | 00:35:25 | |
| Greater than pre development. | 00:35:26 | |
| For the two, the 10 and the 100 year storm. | 00:35:28 | |
| And we actually are very, again very stringent requirements. | 00:35:30 | |
| The review is very stringent. | 00:35:34 | |
| It's again, it's just very tough. | 00:35:38 | |
| And I gave them the analogy at the at the neighborhood meeting. | 00:35:40 | |
| That a detention basin, which is what will turn the pond into. | 00:35:43 | |
| Is basically like taking a glass. | 00:35:47 | |
| Drilling a hole in the bottom. | 00:35:49 | |
| No matter how fast you pour water in the top of the glass, it can only come out. | 00:35:51 | |
| As fast as that straw will allow it to do. | 00:35:55 | |
| We size that glass for 100 year storm. | 00:35:58 | |
| And it can only come out. | 00:36:01 | |
| At pre development 100 year storm. Great. | 00:36:02 | |
| Now once, once, once you get to 100 year storm, which is the cap in the ordinance, all bets are off. Everybody has problems at | 00:36:05 | |
| that point. | 00:36:08 | |
| But anywhere between? | 00:36:11 | |
| Zero and 100 years stolen. We're going to capture the runoff from this side. | 00:36:13 | |
| Run it through our detention basin. | 00:36:16 | |
| And release it. | 00:36:18 | |
| I did not promise them that we would make it better. | 00:36:19 | |
| Oftentimes you see that detention basins make downstream issues better. | 00:36:22 | |
| I can't say we're going to make it better. | 00:36:26 | |
| But I can definitely say we're not going to make it worse. | 00:36:28 | |
| As far as the traffic. | 00:36:31 | |
| This is an in dot control facility, State Road 62. | 00:36:33 | |
| I don't know if you got the e-mail from them, but it would get an e-mail from them. | 00:36:37 | |
| They have again, a stringent review. They're talking about left turn lanes. They may have right turn lanes. | 00:36:42 | |
| We at least will have to make ingress and egress to the neighborhood. | 00:36:48 | |
| 6. | 00:36:51 | |
| Through traffic. That's just through traffic. | 00:36:53 | |
| Your Your ordinance requires a traffic study for anything. | 00:36:56 | |
| That accesses the collector and arterial. | 00:36:59 | |
| 75 vehicle trips per day. | 00:37:02 | |
| A subdivision is roughly 1 vehicle peak hour. | 00:37:05 | |
| Or one vehicle per lot. | 00:37:08 | |
| One peak hour trip per lot. | 00:37:10 | |
| So 53 lots doesn't rise to 75. | 00:37:12 | |
| So that's why we didn't have to do a traffic study. | 00:37:16 | |
| But. | 00:37:18 | |
| But 50 three additional. | 00:37:18 | |
| Trips in an hour on 62 is is that drop in the bucket? | 00:37:21 | |
| Compared to what's already on 62. | 00:37:25 | |
| So I don't think you'll see appreciable. | 00:37:27 | |
| Different appreciable difference there. | 00:37:29 | |
| As far as the buffer. | 00:37:31 | |
| And I failed to mention this. | 00:37:33 | |
| Earlier. | 00:37:35 | |
| One of my favorite things about conservation subdivisions. | 00:37:35 | |
| That I like to do. | 00:37:39 | |
| Is pull the lots in from the outer boundary. | 00:37:40 | |
| So that all of these lots, none of the lots proposed here, touch an adjacent property. | 00:37:43 | |
| There is. | 00:37:48 | |
| 20 at least a 20 foot wide and I believe we have 25 feet of space. | 00:37:49 | |
| From the back of any lot to the. | 00:37:54 | |
| Our intention is to leave as many of those trees. | 00:37:57 | |
| In that area. | 00:38:00 | |
| As we can. | 00:38:01 | |
| The only thing might be is if. | 00:38:02 | |
| Along the edge of a lot. | 00:38:04 | |
| We might put a detention or a Swale in to convey water to the detention basin. | 00:38:05 | |
| So if there's a tree that's sort of straddles the lot line. | 00:38:10 | |
| That might have to come out but in that buffer. | 00:38:13 | |
| There's really no reason for us to take those trees out. | 00:38:15 | |
| Does that answer your questions? Very much so. | 00:38:19 | |
| OK. | 00:38:22 | |
| Again, if you have any questions for me, I'd be happy to answer. Any questions for Mr. I'll just have one I hadn't heard. | 00:38:23 | |
| We always hear this talk of affordability. What's the price point of these homes? | 00:38:29 | |
| And it's not your question to answer what we what we talked about at the neighborhood meeting. | 00:38:33 | |
| Mr. Hammond mentioned 400. | 00:38:37 | |
| Plus, I said 375 just to give him a little bit of grace, 375. | 00:38:39 | |
| To 500. | 00:38:44 | |
| I can't say that this neighborhood is affordable. | 00:38:46 | |
| But what? But what additional housing stock at that price point does? | 00:38:48 | |
| Is it frees up housing? Cheaper housing stock? | 00:38:52 | |
| Right. So if somebody's in a $200,000 house. | 00:38:55 | |
| And they decide to move up to a $400,000 house. | 00:38:57 | |
| Now their house is available for someone else that's more affordable. | 00:39:00 | |
| And it cascades down the line. | 00:39:03 | |
| OK. | 00:39:05 | |
| Any other questions? | 00:39:07 | |
| Is this gonna be catch? | 00:39:09 | |
| In stormwater. | 00:39:10 | |
| The drains or is it all released? Yeah, the the streets themselves will have catch basins. | 00:39:12 | |
| Yes. And then that will all be conveyed to the detention basically. | 00:39:17 | |
| Drainage is just a big thing. | 00:39:24 | |
| Sure. | 00:39:26 | |
| Always is. | 00:39:27 | |
| You know, traffic's right. | 00:39:28 | |
| I've talked to Georgetown, they said the sewers won't be any problem. | 00:39:30 | |
| They check with their engineer and. | 00:39:35 | |
| So that's not a big problem. | 00:39:37 | |
| I guess one more question I have is the all the common areas, 41% of the lot you saw the property says. | 00:39:40 | |
| Common area? Yes. Is the HOA gonna take care of that common area? Yes. | 00:39:45 | |
| Because sometimes they won't give it to the county. We really don't. We're not taking it. | 00:39:50 | |
| And we really don't want it. | 00:39:54 | |
| So the HOA, we take care of all the common area, OK. | 00:39:56 | |
| All righty. | 00:40:01 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 00:40:03 | |
| All righty, All righty. | 00:40:05 | |
| Can I take one second, Mr. | 00:40:07 | |
| Yeah, Mr. Fulkerson, just as a. | 00:40:10 | |
| Thought if you have concerns about people crossing through that barrier, you Indiana does have a purple paint law. | 00:40:12 | |
| So if you know you're lying, you can't put purple paint on the trees. | 00:40:17 | |
| Just to help mark that. | 00:40:20 | |
| If that is a concern of yours. | 00:40:22 | |
| Yeah. | 00:40:26 | |
| Not blue. | 00:40:28 | |
| It's gonna be purple. | 00:40:29 | |
| Hey, Jason, could you mind coming back up just a second? | 00:40:32 | |
| Do you think your applicant would agree as a condition? | 00:40:39 | |
| That the final no vinyl except what he as he stated. | 00:40:42 | |
| It's a written commitment. Written commitment, sure. | 00:40:46 | |
| What's the? | 00:40:49 | |
| Makes typical Max on file. | 00:40:50 | |
| 30 square feet. 50 square feet. | 00:40:52 | |
| OK, OK, OK, that's good. They can do a commitment more than 100 square feet of. | 00:40:57 | |
| As a condition. | 00:41:09 | |
| Written commitments, it's generally like he said, it's going to be shake on the. | 00:41:11 | |
| On the Gables. | 00:41:15 | |
| Yeah, yeah. I mean, otherwise you're gonna have to. Yeah. We want to ride by when we improve these. You want to ride by when they | 00:41:16 | |
| built and be proud of them too. We just. | 00:41:20 | |
| The vinyl just. | 00:41:24 | |
| Yeah, it's moving. | 00:41:28 | |
| Remember that. | 00:41:30 | |
| Remember the houses we looked at in Nob Hill though that had. | 00:41:32 | |
| Even the Hardy was, yeah, great. Yeah. So there are vinyl products that are there, no doubt. And they proved that, too. | 00:41:35 | |
| Yeah, I think we approved that, didn't we, Nick? It's on, it's on our list approval, right? | 00:41:42 | |
| Right. | 00:41:46 | |
| Condition. | 00:41:47 | |
| Yeah, it's a high end. Bottle's got the, uh, star foaming behind it. | 00:41:51 | |
| It's like battle with it. | 00:41:56 | |
| The cost, they say, is very expensive, but. | 00:41:57 | |
| We they showed us Hardy and showed us that and. | 00:42:00 | |
| Right. Well, they already lost money in the house because he said 375. They said over 400. | 00:42:03 | |
| Thanks. Thank you. | 00:42:15 | |
| OK, this time close. | 00:42:17 | |
| And we we're looking for a ballot. | 00:42:20 | |
| Just see if I have one please. | 00:42:23 | |
| Please if I have that one. | 00:42:26 | |
| No. | 00:42:27 | |
| After checking. | 00:42:30 | |
| Docket FC02-206-05. | 00:42:36 | |
| Petitioners named Ernst Berger Planning Trust. | 00:42:40 | |
| Decision After careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission finds that number one. | 00:42:43 | |
| The rezoning of subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:42:49 | |
| Because the proposed subdivision meets the division of foite. | 00:42:53 | |
| Is the vision for growth areas by locating development in close proximity to both sanitary sewers and primary. | 00:42:57 | |
| Arterial transportation corridors. | 00:43:04 | |
| While preserving natural features. | 00:43:06 | |
| This is a land of the principles of smart growth. | 00:43:08 | |
| By having smaller lots which requires less infrastructure per unit for the community to maintain and is in the land with | 00:43:12 | |
| conservation development design associated with. | 00:43:16 | |
| Randall Arnett. | 00:43:21 | |
| Arthur, a rule by design. | 00:43:22 | |
| #2 the rezoning of subject property. | 00:43:24 | |
| Is consistent with the current condition and the character of current structures and uses of in the area because. | 00:43:27 | |
| Other single family residential developments occurred. | 00:43:33 | |
| Just to the north. | 00:43:36 | |
| Of the site. | 00:43:38 | |
| With Sadie Akers and Woodbridge Farms. | 00:43:39 | |
| To the West is Cherry Grove and to the east is Prairie. | 00:43:42 | |
| Just West of. | 00:43:46 | |
| Of Gary Craven Park is another conservation shop so division that was approved in 2024. | 00:43:47 | |
| As a conservation subdivision, this development would intentionally. | 00:43:53 | |
| Preserve contiguous portions of the. | 00:43:57 | |
| Existing tree canopy. | 00:44:00 | |
| And landscape. | 00:44:02 | |
| #3 The rezoning of subject property is necessary for the most desirable use. | 00:44:04 | |
| Of the land because this development is intended as a conservation subdivision. | 00:44:08 | |
| It will provide an. | 00:44:12 | |
| Alternative housing option to the county while preserving natural features. | 00:44:14 | |
| The smart growth vision outlined in the Comprehensive plan encourages A compact building design. | 00:44:18 | |
| Creating a range of housing opportunities and choices. | 00:44:24 | |
| And preservation of open space and natural beauty. | 00:44:27 | |
| Development is encouraged. | 00:44:30 | |
| To concentrate in the areas with sanitary sewer access and is. | 00:44:31 | |
| In proximity to primary artillery transportation corridors. | 00:44:35 | |
| #4 the rezoning subject property. | 00:44:39 | |
| Will not be interest to the. | 00:44:41 | |
| Of other properties in the in the area because the conservation subdivision will preserve approximately 42% of the development. | 00:44:43 | |
| As usual, recreation open space. | 00:44:50 | |
| Or retain natural features. | 00:44:53 | |
| Constructed homes are intended to be built to a housing price comparable to other newly constructed homes in the area. | 00:44:55 | |
| #5. | 00:45:02 | |
| Rezoning of subject proper. | 00:45:05 | |
| Property. | 00:45:07 | |
| Will support reasonable growth and development in the area because the proposed rezoning follows smart growth principles. | 00:45:08 | |
| And is consistent with the county paying documents. | 00:45:14 | |
| And nearby land use such as. | 00:45:16 | |
| Gary Craven Park, the Edwardsville Gateway District and residential uses. | 00:45:18 | |
| At adequate infrastructure is available nearby. | 00:45:23 | |
| And can be brought to the properties. | 00:45:27 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby makes. | 00:45:30 | |
| A favorable recommendation. | 00:45:34 | |
| On the petitioner of rezoning Amendment application at the meeting held on the 9th of March, 2026. | 00:45:36 | |
| A favorable recommendation is made based on the following. | 00:45:42 | |
| Commitment. | 00:45:45 | |
| Disapproval is contingent upon the approval of the proposed conservation subdivision that completes my ballot. | 00:45:46 | |
| Already we have a ballot. I need a second. | 00:45:54 | |
| I'll second. | 00:45:57 | |
| Thank you for writing that. | 00:45:57 | |
| Yes, Sir. Any discussion? | 00:45:59 | |
| None all right. Sorry. Just for clarification though. | 00:46:02 | |
| You guys had asked the applicant if they were willing to. | 00:46:05 | |
| Add a written commitment in there regarding siding as well. | 00:46:09 | |
| You OK? | 00:46:13 | |
| You want on the. | 00:46:14 | |
| Subdivision. | 00:46:16 | |
| On the zoning change. | 00:46:17 | |
| On the zoning. | 00:46:19 | |
| So it needs to be on this one, OK? | 00:46:23 | |
| All right, so we do have a additional. | 00:46:24 | |
| Written, sorry. | 00:46:28 | |
| Yeah. | 00:46:33 | |
| Are you going to want to see that as a recorded zoning commitment? Yeah, recorded. | 00:46:35 | |
| Yes, yeah. | 00:46:41 | |
| OK, that can help you with that if. | 00:46:42 | |
| They haven't my applicant or my client hasn't closed on the property. | 00:46:46 | |
| Does that need to be in the that'll be in the need need to be in the name of the current owner then. Is that right? | 00:46:50 | |
| Yes. Or when are they planning on closing? | 00:46:54 | |
| When all the other approvals are in place, probably. Cart, horse, horse, right? A few months probably. | 00:46:59 | |
| Yeah, yeah. You want a recorded zoning commitment prior to the commissioner meeting? | 00:47:07 | |
| OK. | 00:47:12 | |
| I just want to be clear on that, Yeah. And I can help you with that if you need help with it if you don't have Giraffe, but OK. | 00:47:12 | |
| Just reach out to me. | 00:47:18 | |
| Appreciate it. | 00:47:19 | |
| So we had an addition. | 00:47:20 | |
| So I have amended. | 00:47:22 | |
| The condition #2 Building material no more than 100 square feet of final per house. | 00:47:24 | |
| I need I'll still 2nd that I need a second on the amendment. | 00:47:31 | |
| And all in favor any additional discussion? | 00:47:35 | |
| All in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:47:39 | |
| Thank you. | 00:47:42 | |
| All right, we need a ballot. | 00:47:43 | |
| I'm going the other way first. | 00:47:51 | |
| Thank you. | 00:47:54 | |
| Do you have a chance to have a copy that I could get? | 00:47:57 | |
| Copy of. | 00:48:02 | |
| Everything I got. | 00:48:08 | |
| From the working but yeah. | 00:48:09 | |
| What's this document? | 00:48:10 | |
| This is this one's alone. | 00:48:19 | |
| I thought Chris said 5 pages long people. | 00:48:21 | |
| Did you have a balance? | 00:48:24 | |
| Oh, I thought you did. | 00:48:25 | |
| FC O2-206-06 Applicant Ernst Berger, Planning Trust. | 00:48:31 | |
| Number one, petitioner has met all the following requirements. | 00:48:38 | |
| A preliminary plan provided be. | 00:48:41 | |
| Certification demonstrating compliance with IBEM Rule 5C. Plat provided to defend identifying all pertinent informations. | 00:48:44 | |
| Pursuant to the. | 00:48:52 | |
| SCO and the Floyd County Planning and Zoning. | 00:48:54 | |
| Commission rules. | 00:48:58 | |
| What procedure? | 00:49:00 | |
| Items DE and F are not applicable. | 00:49:01 | |
| G site plan provided that shows tough. | 00:49:04 | |
| Topographic. | 00:49:06 | |
| Wetlands with flood hazard areas, steep slopes. | 00:49:07 | |
| Install shown on having. | 00:49:11 | |
| As having several limitations of program. | 00:49:14 | |
| H Lots All lots comply with the Floyd County zoning. | 00:49:19 | |
| Requirements. | 00:49:22 | |
| Sorry about that. | 00:49:24 | |
| #2. | 00:49:26 | |
| All lights are not laid out along existing. | 00:49:27 | |
| Arterioles collectors are local streets. | 00:49:31 | |
| #3 all lots meet the link requirements of the SEO. | 00:49:34 | |
| Item I. | 00:49:39 | |
| Streets. Streets comply with dimensional geographic standards of the SEO #2 traffic. | 00:49:44 | |
| Common measures are identified where more than. | 00:49:50 | |
| 35 are proposed #3 Any public streets serving the subdivision meets the SCL surface type. | 00:49:53 | |
| And right away requirements #4 All streets are named. | 00:49:59 | |
| Five. There are not. | 00:50:03 | |
| Any permanent dead end streets or private streets? | 00:50:05 | |
| 6 Indiana Department of Transportation approval. | 00:50:09 | |
| Has been received from Maple Dr. intersection with Hwy. 62. | 00:50:12 | |
| #7 curbs and gutters conform to the Indiana dot standard specifications or equivalent standards as determined by the County | 00:50:16 | |
| engineer. | 00:50:20 | |
| Jay driveways, intersection entrances. | 00:50:24 | |
| Number one. | 00:50:27 | |
| The proposal does not provide. | 00:50:28 | |
| Two subdivision entrances required. | 00:50:30 | |
| For a 50 or more life subdivision, however, the developer will. | 00:50:33 | |
| Meet this requirement by providing a single entrance with two lanes, each 16 foot wide. | 00:50:37 | |
| Separated by landscape meeting at least 12 foot wide, extending for a distance of 100 feet. | 00:50:42 | |
| #2 Driveway separation meets the requirements of the SCO. | 00:50:48 | |
| #3 All driveways intersection are located in accordance with the SEO. | 00:50:52 | |
| OK, sidewalk. Sidewalks will be prevented. | 00:50:56 | |
| On both sides of the subdivision streets. | 00:50:59 | |
| #2 is pedestrians. | 00:51:02 | |
| Access will be provided to any park common space recreation. | 00:51:04 | |
| Facility. | 00:51:08 | |
| Located in the subdivision. | 00:51:09 | |
| #3. | 00:51:12 | |
| Protective covenants will assign the obligations for the maintenance and repair of sidewalks and trails to the Lot Lot Owners | 00:51:13 | |
| Association. | 00:51:17 | |
| How convenient covenants will be consistent with the SCO? | 00:51:22 | |
| #2 Petitioner has provided certification to meet the following requirements for drainage and storm water. | 00:51:25 | |
| Hey at the NR approval will be obtained for. | 00:51:31 | |
| Alterations to the natural drainage pattern and natural stream patterns caused by construction of the subdivision. | 00:51:35 | |
| B. Any drainage system will be in. | 00:51:41 | |
| Meets the minimum standards of the SCO. See drainage reports will be provided. | 00:51:44 | |
| D Final drainage plans are required prior to secondary approval. | 00:51:50 | |
| #3 Petitioner has provided a letter confirming availability and willingness to serve. | 00:51:54 | |
| For all necessary utilities, water, sewage, fire. | 00:51:59 | |
| And electric #4 petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer and septic service. | 00:52:03 | |
| A service for the subdivision lights. | 00:52:09 | |
| Will be extended to an IDEM approved municipal or county owned. | 00:52:11 | |
| For Cooperative sanitary sewer. | 00:52:16 | |
| B is not applicable. | 00:52:18 | |
| Decision upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereback grants. | 00:52:22 | |
| Introduce your primary approval. | 00:52:26 | |
| For major subdivisions. Meeting held on the 9th of March 2026. | 00:52:28 | |
| Primary approval is based on a completion of the filing condition. | 00:52:33 | |
| Final approval of drainage and stormwater. | 00:52:36 | |
| Approval by Indiana dot for subdivision Rd. connection. | 00:52:39 | |
| And an update to the entrance for Section 3 point. | 00:52:42 | |
| You know of the subject control ordinances required prior to the secondary approval? | 00:52:46 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 00:52:52 | |
| I'll second that ballot. All right, we have a second any. | 00:52:55 | |
| Had discussion. | 00:52:59 | |
| All in favor signify by aye. | 00:53:01 | |
| Those opposed likewise. | 00:53:03 | |
| You are past. Thank you very much. | 00:53:06 | |
| Okay. | 00:53:12 | |
| We'll wait while we're getting this sign and if you guys want to leave and we'll get our next docket up here. | 00:53:14 | |
| Umm, Frank, you wanna go forward? | 00:53:19 | |
| And big on this one. We did the original survey work on this a couple years ago, so I'm going to recuse myself from this, all | 00:53:23 | |
| right? | 00:53:26 | |
| All right, agenda item number 2. | 00:53:31 | |
| I gave it to Christy. | 00:53:39 | |
| Wait just a second. | 00:53:43 | |
| Hey guys, let a Jason. | 00:53:46 | |
| Can you all go out in the hall so we can continue on? Thanks, I appreciate it. | 00:53:48 | |
| Oh, no problem. | 00:53:53 | |
| Thank you guys. | 00:53:54 | |
| All right, go ahead, Frank. This is a agenda item FC-2. | 00:53:58 | |
| 02-206-07. | 00:54:02 | |
| Zoning map amendment, go ahead. Thank you. | 00:54:05 | |
| So petitioners taking grants on behalf of Troy Streaking. This is located at 5386 Napleton Road and 5390 Navalton Rd. | 00:54:07 | |
| The request is a zoning map amendment. The zoning district currently is rural residential requesting neighborhood commercial. | 00:54:15 | |
| Applicant is requesting A zoning map amendment to rezone 2 properties from rural residential to neighborhood commercial located on | 00:54:21 | |
| .65 acres. Properties are located at the corner of Napleton Road and Brown Street, just off of the US 150. | 00:54:28 | |
| These properties are adjacent to a previously approved zoning map amendment that changed the zoning from RR to NC with docket. | 00:54:34 | |
| Hold on just a second. | 00:54:41 | |
| We we gotta. | 00:54:42 | |
| We got to get to order here. We can't. | 00:54:43 | |
| I made DD man I can't take all one time. | 00:54:46 | |
| Yeah, hold on just a second. | 00:54:49 | |
| All right, go ahead, continue. | 00:54:51 | |
| Applicant is requesting A zoning map amendment to rezone 2 properties from Rural Residential RR to Neighborhood Commercial NC | 00:54:54 | |
| located on 0.65 acres. | 00:54:58 | |
| Properties are located at the corner of Napleton Road and Brown Street, just off of US150. | 00:55:02 | |
| These properties are adjacent to a previously approved zoning map amendment that changed the zoning from RR to NC with Docket | 00:55:07 | |
| FC-0519-17. | 00:55:12 | |
| And was approved with the following written commitments. | 00:55:17 | |
| Any future development will be required to be connected to a sanitary sewer system. | 00:55:19 | |
| The future commercial use of this property must be compatible and complement the adjoining residential properties. | 00:55:23 | |
| Buffer yard standards will be required and all all signage will meet county standards. | 00:55:28 | |
| The zone amendment is to accommodate a proposed conceptual plan for a new 5000 square foot healthcare practitioner's office | 00:55:33 | |
| building. | 00:55:36 | |
| The conceptual proposal would still need an approved development plan. The site does not currently have approved sewer connection. | 00:55:39 | |
| For staff comments, the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan because. | 00:55:46 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property fits the character of adjoining parcels to the South, east and West. Future commercial land | 00:55:52 | |
| use will be directed towards the Galena area and the town of. | 00:55:56 | |
| Town of Greenville. | 00:56:01 | |
| Greenville Township page 50 of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:56:02 | |
| The site does not have approved sewer connection at this time, but development would require such a connection or variance before | 00:56:05 | |
| it could be approved. | 00:56:09 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the current conditions and the character of current structures and uses in | 00:56:12 | |
| the area because the rezoning of the subject property fits the character of adjoining parcels to the of the church to the West, | 00:56:16 | |
| the rezoned properties to the South. | 00:56:20 | |
| And the Jacobi gas station on US150. However, there are homes across Brown Street. | 00:56:25 | |
| Buffer yard standards will be required for commercial use if the amendment is approved. | 00:56:29 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land because. | 00:56:33 | |
| Subject property is located at a signal. | 00:56:38 | |
| Signalized intersection of a minor arterial US150 and major collector roadway. Napleton Rd. Property is located in a commercial | 00:56:40 | |
| node. | 00:56:44 | |
| Just Galita. | 00:56:49 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be injurious to the value of the property. | 00:56:50 | |
| Of the of the other properties in the area because subject property is located near other commercially zoned properties. | 00:56:54 | |
| And for Section 5.09 of the Floyd County zoning ordinance will require a Type 2 buffer yard. | 00:57:00 | |
| With an additional 15 foot set back with required landscape. | 00:57:06 | |
| Plantings and a berm or fence. | 00:57:09 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development in the area because subject property is | 00:57:11 | |
| located in an area designated for commercial growth and is located at a major signalized intersection. | 00:57:16 | |
| 2017 Vision, Floyd County Comprehensive Plan states. | 00:57:22 | |
| The community also has several smaller commercial areas. These areas provide local commercial needs for residents. These areas | 00:57:25 | |
| include the Ableton Rd. US150. | 00:57:29 | |
| Charlestown Rd. County Line Rd. | 00:57:33 | |
| Paoli Pike, Scottsdale Rd. And Cordon Pike. | 00:57:35 | |
| Small commercial activities presently occur in these vicinities and should continue. | 00:57:37 | |
| That's from the growth assessment. | 00:57:41 | |
| Or growth areas for commercial Page 43 of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:57:43 | |
| Or staff comments. The conceptual plan will need several modifications before submission as a development plan. | 00:57:47 | |
| And for staff recommendations written commitment to not develop without sewer connection. | 00:57:53 | |
| So I have to stop. | 00:57:58 | |
| On his. | 00:58:01 | |
| On his sketch. | 00:58:02 | |
| That the applicant is approved. I know this isn't. | 00:58:04 | |
| It's just a conceptual thing. | 00:58:07 | |
| Put the buffers on. | 00:58:09 | |
| Across the rear of the property. | 00:58:12 | |
| He doesn't bring that buffers on all the way. Doesn't he have to cover the whole? | 00:58:14 | |
| Or is it because there's a parking lot? I'm a little confused where. | 00:58:18 | |
| I. | 00:58:23 | |
| And I apologize because it's been a moment since I last looked at this, but the my understanding was that that buffer would have | 00:58:24 | |
| to go across the entirety. | 00:58:27 | |
| Across the entire back line. | 00:58:31 | |
| OK, so I'll be over right now. | 00:58:33 | |
| I have a question. | 00:58:36 | |
| This is not looking at fixing the light at 150 Napleton so there is an actual turn lane. | 00:58:37 | |
| Because it's coming from. | 00:58:43 | |
| The Firehouse if you if it was a medical building. | 00:58:45 | |
| Traffic's gonna get backed up 'cause you're not gonna be able to turn left during peak hours. | 00:58:48 | |
| Not going to return left at all. Hardly. | 00:58:53 | |
| Yeah, yeah, you can't. Hardly now anyway. | 00:58:55 | |
| But now for putting a facility there where people have to get there at a certain time. | 00:58:58 | |
| Huh. | 00:59:05 | |
| I don't have an answer for. | 00:59:06 | |
| That would be up to him that they would, they would conduct a study and determine whether it's warranted or not and they would | 00:59:19 | |
| install that. | 00:59:23 | |
| I just didn't know. I know and I was doing stuff, so I didn't know where we fell in. | 00:59:28 | |
| I mean, if they have looked at, I know they have looked at that light they looked at. | 00:59:32 | |
| Yes, it is. That would be determined. That's fine. Yeah. | 00:59:41 | |
| In this entrance, here is how much commercial traffic. | 00:59:46 | |
| Who is the Illinois? | 00:59:50 | |
| On the staff report. | 00:59:52 | |
| On the neighboring property that was previously approved. | 00:59:54 | |
| Have they got served? | 00:59:59 | |
| No, not at this time and development. | 01:00:01 | |
| Right, no development. | 01:00:05 | |
| But. | 01:00:09 | |
| Pardon me, where was that? | 01:00:11 | |
| That you're it's in his in his staff report overview the the adjacent property that received that researching the condition | 01:00:12 | |
| because it's a part of this conceptual. | 01:00:18 | |
| Plan uh, it is directly adjacent to several of the lots that they're requesting to be rezoned and included in the conceptual. | 01:00:24 | |
| Plan OK, so part of it was already rezoned and part hasn't so part of. | 01:00:32 | |
| OK has already been zoned neighborhood commercial. They're asking for a couple additional lots that are directed to adjacent and | 01:00:38 | |
| then they will have a single property. | 01:00:43 | |
| Where where the parking lot is has already been approved. | 01:00:48 | |
| Yeah, the back part. | 01:00:50 | |
| Where the detention basin and the building is, that's not in the approved. | 01:00:52 | |
| There are two additional lots, so there's two houses that have to be torn down and all that. | 01:00:57 | |
| And. | 01:01:02 | |
| Thanks. Switch it. | 01:01:04 | |
| Right. | 01:01:06 | |
| They had to run under 150 for sewer, correct? | 01:01:07 | |
| Would you say Frank? | 01:01:13 | |
| They had to run under 150 for sewers, so the state's going to be involved quite a bit. | 01:01:15 | |
| If you go forward with that. | 01:01:21 | |
| I would really caution you on the shrubbery that you put on that corner. | 01:01:23 | |
| Because you can't see now. | 01:01:28 | |
| And there's nothing there. | 01:01:31 | |
| There's everybody signs that does roofing. | 01:01:32 | |
| Yeah, I'm waiting. | 01:01:39 | |
| Just one more note, this is for the rezoning. We would have a full development interview look at. | 01:01:43 | |
| Are the entrances right? Turn lanes require all those things? | 01:01:49 | |
| Gotcha. | 01:01:56 | |
| Thank you. We got it. | 01:01:57 | |
| Thank you, Frank. | 01:01:59 | |
| All right, applicant, come forward, Mr. Grimes. | 01:02:01 | |
| State your name and address for the record. | 01:02:06 | |
| Yeah, Nathan Grams with Renaissance Design Build, 117 S Indiana Ave. Sullenburg, Indiana. | 01:02:08 | |
| You're representing Troy Segrell, who owns the NCLLC. | 01:02:14 | |
| And just kind of. | 01:02:19 | |
| Give you guys a little overview. I think you've discussed a lot of it already. | 01:02:23 | |
| The there's a total of 123. | 01:02:28 | |
| There's a total of 6 lots we're talking about here. | 01:02:35 | |
| I think 4 of them have already been rezoned in. | 01:02:38 | |
| And they're currently undeveloped. | 01:02:41 | |
| And there's a two that have housed on them or what we're. | 01:02:43 | |
| It owner owns them as well so we try to get the whole. | 01:02:46 | |
| Corridors or old group? | 01:02:50 | |
| Zoned the NC is what we're doing here. | 01:02:53 | |
| And I'm not sure he actually has a. | 01:02:55 | |
| Ten and four this year, did you? | 01:02:59 | |
| So it's not. | 01:03:01 | |
| So the entrances that are showing on here, all that in the parking lot, we're not, we're not. That's that's just. | 01:03:04 | |
| Yeah, I got you. So that you can get the right parking on it and a detention basin and. | 01:03:13 | |
| Landscaping in. | 01:03:18 | |
| Russian, we intend to meet your ordinances, whatever. | 01:03:20 | |
| Will abide by the sewer. | 01:03:23 | |
| So we don't want to get into all the answers and. | 01:03:25 | |
| One of the houses is these be torn out already. | 01:03:29 | |
| They're going to tear that down. The other house may come down later at this point time so. | 01:03:31 | |
| But anyway, we're trying to get the whole. | 01:03:36 | |
| Thing zoned NC. | 01:03:38 | |
| And like the staff report said. | 01:03:41 | |
| This meets all the criteria for the three criteria as you're. | 01:03:43 | |
| Need, and there's NC. | 01:03:47 | |
| To the left, to the right, across the street on 150. | 01:03:50 | |
| Everything's already in C, except across Brown Street. | 01:03:54 | |
| Thing and maybe the adjoiner. | 01:03:57 | |
| Down Brown Street, so. | 01:04:02 | |
| Does the applicant already own this property or is it under option? | 01:04:04 | |
| Yes. | 01:04:10 | |
| Any other questions? | 01:04:12 | |
| For Mr. Grams. | 01:04:14 | |
| No, I haven't had questions. | 01:04:16 | |
| Yeah, simple is good. | 01:04:20 | |
| After. | 01:04:24 | |
| PCA. | 01:04:26 | |
| OK. Thank you, Nathan, at this time. | 01:04:29 | |
| We opened up the floor name I want to speak in. | 01:04:34 | |
| Favor of this? | 01:04:37 | |
| Come forward. | 01:04:40 | |
| Do you have any more questions if you need to? | 01:04:41 | |
| What you gotta? | 01:04:44 | |
| I can't talk to you like that. I've got it. You got to state your name, right? All that's good stuff. Yeah. State your name and | 01:04:45 | |
| address. | 01:04:48 | |
| Troy Striegel, 4100, for sales Court. | 01:04:52 | |
| Only knows. Go ahead. You guys got any questions for the property? | 01:04:55 | |
| The there's one, there is one requirement. | 01:04:59 | |
| And I would probably add to this. | 01:05:02 | |
| Hopefully you don't have a problem, but. | 01:05:04 | |
| On Napleton Road I'd be asking for 30 foot or right away from Centerland. | 01:05:07 | |
| For county. | 01:05:14 | |
| Dedicated to the county. | 01:05:15 | |
| Yeah, we'll have to again. We'll try to meet anything you asked for. We just got to make sure it works for us as far as the | 01:05:19 | |
| development we're. | 01:05:22 | |
| Again, that medical was thrown out there. We don't have any idea what we're doing yet. | 01:05:25 | |
| We want to get approval, we want to start doing some site plans and figure it out from there. | 01:05:29 | |
| That that's pretty standard to go back to LA to make sure. | 01:05:32 | |
| For all those old, older county roads. | 01:05:37 | |
| Described. | 01:05:40 | |
| Yeah, it's almost a requirement, right? I mean. | 01:05:41 | |
| I mean, it's going to that scene. | 01:05:43 | |
| Yeah, should be easy enough. Do we need to write that in the conditions? OK, be written in the conditions. | 01:05:45 | |
| Are you in favor of this? | 01:05:52 | |
| Yes, how you are glad to hear that. | 01:05:55 | |
| Well, I figured that was the first part. The people that are in favor. | 01:06:00 | |
| There you go, Based on what you did. That's why I'll let you come up there. | 01:06:03 | |
| All right, now, anybody else in favor? | 01:06:07 | |
| Thank you. OK, Thank you. | 01:06:10 | |
| All right, that closes that portion. Let's open up for anybody in opposition. | 01:06:12 | |
| Sure, you all got lucky. | 01:06:18 | |
| How do I talk about? | 01:06:21 | |
| If that case is closed. | 01:06:23 | |
| Now I don't. | 01:06:25 | |
| You're welcome, Mr. Grimes, to come up and talk about anything. It was discussed in the. | 01:06:26 | |
| In the open comments Which? | 01:06:31 | |
| There were none. | 01:06:33 | |
| All right, so. | 01:06:35 | |
| Any other questions at that time, we're going to. | 01:06:37 | |
| Ask for a ballot. | 01:06:40 | |
| Please so we can get out of here for you. | 01:06:41 | |
| Mr. Evil Hazard, Mr. | 01:06:44 | |
| Yeah, somebody else praying. 1 next week, please Promise, promise me, promise. 2-206-07 Petitioner Nathan Grimes. | 01:06:48 | |
| Decision After careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission finds that one. | 01:06:56 | |
| Rezoning of subject property. | 01:07:00 | |
| Is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning of subject property fits the character of adjoining | 01:07:02 | |
| parcels. | 01:07:06 | |
| Through the Southeast and West. | 01:07:09 | |
| Future commercial land uses will be directed towards the Galena area. | 01:07:11 | |
| In the town of Greenville. | 01:07:15 | |
| The site does not have a. | 01:07:17 | |
| Approved sewer connection at this time. | 01:07:19 | |
| But development will. | 01:07:21 | |
| Would require such a connection or a variance before it can be approved. | 01:07:22 | |
| #2 the rezoning of the subject property. | 01:07:28 | |
| Is consistent with the current condition. | 01:07:31 | |
| And the character of current structures and uses in the area because it's rezoning of the subject property fits the character of. | 01:07:33 | |
| Adjoining proper. | 01:07:40 | |
| Parcels. | 01:07:41 | |
| Of the church to the West, the rezoned properties to the South, and Jacobi gas station on US150. | 01:07:42 | |
| Buffy Yard standards will be required for commercial use. | 01:07:48 | |
| #3 The rezoning of subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land because subject property is located at a | 01:07:52 | |
| signalized intersection. | 01:07:56 | |
| On a major on a manner arterially 150 and major collector roadway neighborhood and Rd. | 01:08:00 | |
| Property is located in a commercial note Galena. | 01:08:06 | |
| #4 the rezoning of the subject property will. | 01:08:11 | |
| Be interest to. | 01:08:14 | |
| Will not be interest to the value of other properties in the. | 01:08:15 | |
| Because subject property is located near the commercial. | 01:08:19 | |
| Leaves property. | 01:08:22 | |
| In persection, 5.09 of the FCCO will require type 2 buffer yard. | 01:08:24 | |
| With additional 15 foot set back required landscape planning. | 01:08:29 | |
| A burn or fence. | 01:08:34 | |
| #5 the rezoning of the subject property will. | 01:08:38 | |
| Support responsible growth and development in the area because subject property is located in area designated. | 01:08:41 | |
| For commercial growth and is located at a major signalized intersection. | 01:08:47 | |
| The 2017 Vision Floyd County Comprehensive Plan The community also has several smaller commercial areas. | 01:08:52 | |
| These areas provide local commercial needs. | 01:08:59 | |
| For residents, these areas include Naval and Road US150, Charlestown Rd. County Line Rd. Paoli. | 01:09:02 | |
| Pike and Scottsville Rowan carbon Pike smaller commercial activities presently can. | 01:09:08 | |
| Occur in these vicinities and should continue. | 01:09:13 | |
| Upon careful review, Floyd County Planning Commission hereby makes a favorable recommendation on the petitioners. | 01:09:17 | |
| Zoning Amendment Application That the meeting held on the 9th of March, 2026. A favorable recommendation is made based on the | 01:09:22 | |
| following written Commission. | 01:09:26 | |
| Conceptual plan will be modified. | 01:09:31 | |
| Before being submitted as a development plan #2A written commitment from the applicant is required to not develop without a sewer | 01:09:33 | |
| connection. | 01:09:37 | |
| #330 foot right away from center line and Ableton Rd. is required. | 01:09:41 | |
| Completes my balance. | 01:09:47 | |
| We have a second. Any further discussion? | 01:09:48 | |
| Uh, just a note that's, that's not in Greenville, it's in Floyd Knobs. | 01:09:51 | |
| I don't know if it's important. | 01:09:57 | |
| But it's in Floyd now. | 01:09:59 | |
| Do we need to change anything? | 01:10:03 | |
| Get your lovely Excuse me, that'd be Lafayette Township. | 01:10:05 | |
| Nope, that's in Greenville Township, but it's. | 01:10:10 | |
| Not in Greenville. | 01:10:13 | |
| Number one. | 01:10:15 | |
| E-mail Township. | 01:10:17 | |
| Revealed to Handship is Right. | 01:10:19 | |
| Excuse me, Greenville Township is right. Greenville Township. | 01:10:21 | |
| Is correct. I thought you said Greenville town, he says. | 01:10:25 | |
| That don't it, it doesn't say Township. I can adjust the word. It's a typo. Like I said, I don't know if it's important or not, | 01:10:30 | |
| but it is important. | 01:10:33 | |
| You caught something. | 01:10:37 | |
| It's the investigator come in. | 01:10:40 | |
| Yeah, there you go. | 01:10:41 | |
| Amended. | 01:10:43 | |
| All right, you want to read the amendment, please. | 01:10:45 | |
| Just read. Just read the line. I don't care just what out of it is. | 01:10:47 | |
| Future commercial land I would just say with a noted change area and the. | 01:10:52 | |
| Greenville Township, is that what you want? There you go. Just want to rewritten. | 01:10:56 | |
| Reread for the record. | 01:11:00 | |
| OK, Christy's over kicking me. | 01:11:01 | |
| All right, the amended. | 01:11:06 | |
| Beth, you want to make a second on the amendment, whoever made the second? | 01:11:08 | |
| I'll make the motion on the 2nd to. | 01:11:12 | |
| Any further discussion? | 01:11:14 | |
| None all in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:11:16 | |
| It passes. Don't nobody leave. | 01:11:21 | |
| We have nothing else on the. | 01:11:23 | |
| She does just. | 01:11:26 | |
| Changing the June 8th meeting and that Nick's going to send out Nick, Angela Frank will send out an e-mail to pull everybody on | 01:11:30 | |
| the options for June. | 01:11:34 | |
| All right, you'll be getting noticed from Nick. | 01:11:38 | |
| Within 90 days. | 01:11:49 | |
| And the written commitments will need to be recorded. | 01:11:51 | |
| Prepared, recorded and. | 01:11:54 | |
| Ready to go prior to? | 01:11:56 | |
| By statute, we have 90 days from certification. | 01:12:02 | |
| I certify. Oh, I gotta have it. | 01:12:07 | |
| I was going to have him send it while you why you closed up. OK, that's good. | 01:12:09 | |
| Good, good. All right. | 01:12:13 | |
| What are we? | 01:12:15 | |
| We clear to go, Frank and Nick. | 01:12:16 | |
| We good to adjourn. | 01:12:19 | |
| **** good, right? | 01:12:20 | |
| Make a motion to adjourn. Motion. | 01:12:23 | |
| Make a motion to adjourn. Second motion. Second. All in favor signify by. | 01:12:25 | |
| Alright, see y'all next month. | 01:12:31 | |
| Thank you, Floyd County. | 01:12:33 | |
| Sure. | 01:12:35 | |
| Alright. | 01:12:36 |
Transcript
| On today, March 9th, 2026, 7:00 PM. | 00:00:00 | |
| At this time, we will do the pledge allegiance, please. | 00:00:03 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. | 00:00:08 | |
| And to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God. | 00:00:11 | |
| Indivisible with liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:16 | |
| All righty, at this time we have roll call. | 00:00:21 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:26 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:29 | |
| Here. | 00:00:33 | |
| Mr. Bagshaw here. | 00:00:34 | |
| Here, Mr. Lu. | 00:00:36 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:38 | |
| We have a full board. Thank you everybody. | 00:00:41 | |
| It's nice that there's no football or basketball games on the night. | 00:00:45 | |
| For sure. All right. | 00:00:49 | |
| We'd like to have somebody. | 00:00:53 | |
| Approve the minutes. | 00:00:55 | |
| Of the February 9th. | 00:00:56 | |
| And I was not there. So I will not, I will not be able to vote on that. And Connie, thank you for running that meeting for me in | 00:00:58 | |
| my absence. | 00:01:02 | |
| Like she did a great job, I just want to make it make mention of the. | 00:01:05 | |
| I'm glad I got a good make a motion to approve the minutes. We have a motion. I'll second any discussion. | 00:01:09 | |
| All in favor signify by aye aye. Those opposed likewise thank you. All right now I need medicine for Connie to sign. Who has a | 00:01:16 | |
| copy of the minutes. | 00:01:20 | |
| You got one from. | 00:01:25 | |
| There you go. | 00:01:26 | |
| I want to send a face. | 00:01:27 | |
| All righty. We have no old business. Is that correct, Frank? | 00:01:30 | |
| No old business. | 00:01:33 | |
| OK. New business is agenda item. | 00:01:35 | |
| One that agenda item 1 is FC-02-206-05. | 00:01:38 | |
| And FC-O2-206-06. | 00:01:45 | |
| And we're putting those together. Is that correct? | 00:01:51 | |
| And do we need to ask the applicant for permission or? Yes, I would recommend we ask the applicant to make sure we're getting a | 00:01:54 | |
| thumbs up from Jason Copper weight. OK, you're good with that, Jason. OK, if that's the case, Frank, would you please come up and. | 00:02:00 | |
| Give us your staff report, Sir. | 00:02:05 | |
| Good evening everyone. | 00:02:08 | |
| The proposals for the Ernst Berger Conservation Subdivision. | 00:02:11 | |
| Location of 6060 State Road 62. | 00:02:17 | |
| Georgetown, IN 47122 requesting first a zoning map amendment. This is in the zoning district of Rural Residential RR. | 00:02:20 | |
| And requesting residential suburban. | 00:02:28 | |
| Applicant is requesting A zoning map amendment to rezone 16.682 acres from rural residential to residential suburban with a | 00:02:30 | |
| conservation overlay in the Georgetown Township. | 00:02:35 | |
| The property lies to the north of State Road 62 near the intersection with Unawine Lane and Hancock Rd. located in close proximity | 00:02:40 | |
| to Gary E Cavan Park and the Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:02:44 | |
| This rezone is accompanying the proposal of a 53 lot single family detached residential conservation subdivision with the proposed | 00:02:49 | |
| density of 3.17 dwellings per. | 00:02:53 | |
| Acres with 116,348.76 square feet of right away. | 00:02:58 | |
| And 250. | 00:03:03 | |
| 6000 square feet of open space. | 00:03:04 | |
| The first half comments the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan because as | 00:03:07 | |
| this is intended as a conservation subdivision. | 00:03:11 | |
| The proposal meets the vision for growth. | 00:03:15 | |
| Growth areas by locating development in close proximity to both sanitary sewers and. | 00:03:17 | |
| Primary arterial transportation corridors. | 00:03:21 | |
| While preserving natural features. | 00:03:24 | |
| This is in line with the principles of smart growth by having smaller lots which require less infrastructure per unit. | 00:03:26 | |
| For the community to maintain and is in line with the conservation development designs associated with Randall Arendt, author of | 00:03:31 | |
| Rural by Design, which is on page 41 of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:03:35 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the current conditions and the character of current structures. | 00:03:40 | |
| And uses in the area because other single family residential developments occur just to the north of the site with Sandy Acres | 00:03:46 | |
| Plat 789 and Woodridge Farm. | 00:03:50 | |
| Plot 1285. | 00:03:54 | |
| To the West with Cherry Grove at 1193 and to the east with Pear Ridge. | 00:03:55 | |
| Flat 1053 just West of Gary Cabin Park is another conservation subdivision. | 00:03:59 | |
| That was approved in 2024. | 00:04:04 | |
| Further up Hwy. 62 within the Edwardsville Gateway District are other single family and multi family residential developments. | 00:04:06 | |
| Further, as a conservation subdivision, this development would intentionally preserve contiguous portions of the existing tree | 00:04:12 | |
| canopy and landscape. | 00:04:15 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land. As this is intended as a conservation | 00:04:21 | |
| subdivision, it will provide an alternative. | 00:04:25 | |
| An alternative housing option to the county while preserving natural features. | 00:04:29 | |
| The smart growth visions outlined in the Comprehensive Plan encourage A compact building design, creating a range of housing | 00:04:33 | |
| opportunities and choices. | 00:04:36 | |
| And preservation of open space and natural beauty. | 00:04:39 | |
| Further development should be encouraged to concentrate in areas with sanitary sewer access and in proximity to primary arterial | 00:04:42 | |
| transportation corridors. | 00:04:45 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be injurious to the value of other properties in the area because the conservation | 00:04:50 | |
| subdivision will preserve 41.9% of the development as usable recreation and open space or retain natural features. | 00:04:56 | |
| The constructed homes are intended to be built to a housing price comparable to other newly constructed homes in the area. | 00:05:02 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development in the area because, as this is accompanied | 00:05:09 | |
| by a conservation subdivision, the proposed rezoning follows smart growth principles and is consistent with the county planning | 00:05:13 | |
| documents and nearby land uses such as Gary E Cavan Park. | 00:05:18 | |
| The Edwardsville Gateway District and residential uses. | 00:05:22 | |
| Adequate infrastructure is available nearby and can be brought to the properties. | 00:05:25 | |
| Staff Recommendations Favorable recommendation contingent on the approval of the Conservation subdivision proposed. | 00:05:28 | |
| For the. | 00:05:36 | |
| Docket for the actual Conservation subdivision. | 00:05:37 | |
| The petitioner is seeking approval of conservation subdivision to be known as Maplewood Crossing. | 00:05:41 | |
| The proposal will consolidate 2 parcels totaling 16.682 acres and 253 lots at 6000 square feet for each lot totaling 354,319 | 00:05:45 | |
| square feet for the developable area. | 00:05:50 | |
| Service by the proposed Maplewood Dr. | 00:05:56 | |
| A 50 foot right away consisting. | 00:05:58 | |
| Or containing 116,348.76 square feet. | 00:06:00 | |
| With an open space containing the remaining 256,000 square feet. Intended to preserve natural features at the site. | 00:06:04 | |
| Meeting the conservation subdivision requirements, the property will also have a recreation area containing and I apologize and my | 00:06:10 | |
| staff report I have updated information after the plaque committee. This was updated to 2 acres. | 00:06:15 | |
| Including the storm water retention area as a current pond that would be retained. | 00:06:21 | |
| The developer will provide a horseboard, fence, row and landscaping along Hwy. 62. | 00:06:25 | |
| Running along the southern border of the development. | 00:06:30 | |
| The property is located within the transitional residential land use of the Georgetown Township as described by the 2017 | 00:06:32 | |
| Comprehensive Plan on page 47. | 00:06:36 | |
| The same section encourages conservation subdivisions and residential development to be located within residential growth areas. | 00:06:40 | |
| Which is defined on page 41 as areas with proximity to adequate infrastructure and public services. | 00:06:46 | |
| This proposal has obtained the necessary willingness to service letters from the local public services and under the traffic count | 00:06:51 | |
| required to obtain a traffic study. | 00:06:54 | |
| While this section does call out that higher density development should be discouraged in transitional areas, higher density is | 00:06:59 | |
| defined as eight or more dwellings per acre, whereas this proposal is only 3.17 dwellings per acre. | 00:07:05 | |
| Adjoining properties to the West are a stretch of rural residential properties along the inline lane. | 00:07:11 | |
| To the east of the property are more rural residential properties along State Route 62. | 00:07:15 | |
| With the Edwardsville Trace Apartments just past those to the north are the platted subdivisions of Sandy Acres and Woodbridge | 00:07:20 | |
| Farm. | 00:07:23 | |
| Both zoned rural residential and just to their W is Gary Cabin Park. | 00:07:27 | |
| South of the property on the opposite side of State Road 62, our stretch of conforming and non conforming residential lots in the | 00:07:32 | |
| Agricultural Residential zoning district. | 00:07:36 | |
| Where are the conservation subdivision density standards? The base density calculation is the net square footage divided by the | 00:07:41 | |
| base zoning district lot size for the development. | 00:07:44 | |
| The current base zone for the proposal is rural residential, allowing 16 units. | 00:07:48 | |
| With the rezone to residential suburban, this would allow a base density of 50.86 units. | 00:07:52 | |
| The petitioner is also pursuing a 5% density bonus by meeting the requirement to provide a fence row along State Road 62. | 00:07:57 | |
| Bringing the density up to 53.4 rounded down. 53 units allowed. | 00:08:04 | |
| A plat review and a neighborhood meeting were held on March 4th for this development. | 00:08:08 | |
| I've also provided A signet sheet. | 00:08:12 | |
| The petitioner has provided A compliant preliminary plan for the project, including a preliminary plat. The petitioner has | 00:08:15 | |
| provided certification that all drainage and. | 00:08:19 | |
| Environmental requirements will be complied with and that there are no known outstanding issues concerning item. | 00:08:23 | |
| A geotechnical report is not required for this property. Traffic study is not deemed necessary as this would be under the 75 peak | 00:08:28 | |
| power trips. | 00:08:31 | |
| Phase one environmental study was not required. | 00:08:35 | |
| Lots meet the size and frontage standards of the FCZ Sorry County zoning ordinance for residential suburban in a conservation | 00:08:38 | |
| subdivision and are laid out along subdivision streets compliant with. | 00:08:43 | |
| The subdivision control ordinance standards. | 00:08:49 | |
| Maplewood Dr. Is. | 00:08:51 | |
| Proposed as the subdivision St. connecting to State Road 62, which still needs. | 00:08:52 | |
| Actually, we have received the INDOT approval. | 00:08:57 | |
| That is placed on the. | 00:09:00 | |
| On the desk as well. | 00:09:01 | |
| Petitioner has indicated that sidewalks will be provided and the connection is required. | 00:09:07 | |
| By the subdivision control ordinance to connect to the recreation area provided. | 00:09:11 | |
| Certification to ME county drainage and stormwater standards. | 00:09:16 | |
| Has been provided and final approval drainage plans are required prior to secondary approval. | 00:09:19 | |
| And the petitioner has provided willingness to serve letters from Edwardsville Water Authority, the Floyd County Fire Territory, | 00:09:23 | |
| Harrison RMC, Duke Energy and Georgetown sewers. | 00:09:28 | |
| Wastewater will be provided by Georgetown sewers. | 00:09:32 | |
| As staff recommendations, final approval of drainage stormwater plans and an update to. | 00:09:35 | |
| The entrance were required prior to secondary approval. That update to the entrance is reflected on the new. | 00:09:40 | |
| The new platform. | 00:09:45 | |
| That's in place on your own. | 00:09:47 | |
| That's that's all. I have those options. | 00:09:48 | |
| OK, I got a question. | 00:09:53 | |
| You, you said the traffic study wasn't done because of what was, what's the, what's that right? | 00:09:56 | |
| There is a certain. | 00:10:01 | |
| Peak hour trips if they're under that amount. | 00:10:06 | |
| Then a traffic study is not. | 00:10:10 | |
| OK, I thought it was based on lots. | 00:10:12 | |
| It's not based on our. | 00:10:14 | |
| OK, that's good. | 00:10:16 | |
| And then? | 00:10:17 | |
| This is a zone change, correct? | 00:10:19 | |
| Yes, first a zone change and then a conservation right, But this has to go in front of the commissioners for approval. That | 00:10:21 | |
| correct, correct. | 00:10:25 | |
| OK. All right. | 00:10:30 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:10:32 | |
| OK this time. | 00:10:38 | |
| No questions. All right. Thanks, Frank. | 00:10:39 | |
| OK, at this time the petitioner come up in. | 00:10:41 | |
| For the instructions on the board, we give him 10 minutes. | 00:10:47 | |
| Starting now. | 00:10:53 | |
| What's your name? Thank you. | 00:10:55 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:10:59 | |
| Thank you. | 00:11:01 | |
| Trees, trees, trees. | 00:11:06 | |
| You already lost 3. | 00:11:10 | |
| 3 trees. | 00:11:12 | |
| I just thought that I was in the store this year. I just thought that. | 00:11:19 | |
| Good evening, Jason Copper, Wave, Primavera and Associates, 1000 Bell Lane at New Albany IN here representing Discovery builders | 00:11:24 | |
| and developers. | 00:11:28 | |
| With discovery are Alex Minnick and Ethan Ammon. | 00:11:32 | |
| Also with me is Eric Martin. Some representatives from the family who own the property are here as well. | 00:11:36 | |
| Arensberger family in the back. | 00:11:42 | |
| In the back there. | 00:11:44 | |
| The first slide I showed you is the is an aerial of of the vicinity. | 00:11:47 | |
| And the site is indicated in the yellow dash. | 00:11:52 | |
| Dashes. | 00:11:54 | |
| You see it's on the north side of State Road 62. | 00:11:56 | |
| Just West of its intersection with Unawine Lane. | 00:11:58 | |
| As you can see, Gary Caven Park is to the northwest. Edwardsville Trace Apartments or. | 00:12:02 | |
| Couple properties to the West. | 00:12:06 | |
| Just southwest of Poly Freeze. | 00:12:08 | |
| The next side, this is the zoning map for the for the area. | 00:12:12 | |
| See Edwardsville traces our plan year development. | 00:12:15 | |
| Gary Cavan is a. | 00:12:18 | |
| Park. | 00:12:19 | |
| I think. | 00:12:20 | |
| I thought there was a zone change for that of the conservation subdivision to the northwest. | 00:12:21 | |
| Again, the site is indicated in the yellow dashed lines. | 00:12:26 | |
| The request would be to. | 00:12:31 | |
| Change the zone from RR to Rs. | 00:12:32 | |
| And I will read these justifications. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plans vision for growth areas by locating | 00:12:35 | |
| higher density subdivisions. | 00:12:39 | |
| In close proximity to both sanitary sewers. | 00:12:43 | |
| And primary arterial transportation corridors. | 00:12:46 | |
| Following the precepts for smart growth. | 00:12:49 | |
| State Road 62 is considered a. | 00:12:51 | |
| If not a major correct collector, IA minor arterial. | 00:12:54 | |
| And we do have sanitary sewers to the site. | 00:12:59 | |
| Smaller lot sizes should be considered in these areas if connected to sanitary sewers. | 00:13:02 | |
| And associated with conservation development design proposed. | 00:13:06 | |
| In the styles associated with Randall Aaron. | 00:13:09 | |
| And I'll get to that. | 00:13:12 | |
| I'll get to that shortly. | 00:13:13 | |
| The proposed use of single family residential is consistent with the current conditions of the area. | 00:13:14 | |
| The area consists of single family residential to the east. | 00:13:19 | |
| North-south and an existing multi family residential planning development to the West. | 00:13:22 | |
| The rezoning of the property will be necessary for the most desirable land use. | 00:13:27 | |
| The comprehensive plan outlines smart growth visions. | 00:13:30 | |
| Objective and policies. | 00:13:33 | |
| For higher density developments located along major arterial corridors. | 00:13:35 | |
| Buffer areas have been provided on all. | 00:13:39 | |
| By bordering property lines to the adjoining neighbors. | 00:13:41 | |
| And by clustering the development. | 00:13:45 | |
| It will allow for the pond area to remain. | 00:13:47 | |
| In an active. | 00:13:49 | |
| I should say recreational setting. | 00:13:51 | |
| The rezoning will not be injurious to the value of other properties in the area. | 00:13:54 | |
| The conservation subdivision design will provide clustered single family residential homes. | 00:13:57 | |
| Allowing for 41.8% of the development. | 00:14:02 | |
| To remain as usable. | 00:14:05 | |
| Recreational open space. | 00:14:07 | |
| And housing pricing comparable to other new construction homes in the area. | 00:14:09 | |
| High density residential land use will be directed toward existing infrastructure. | 00:14:13 | |
| And near existing residential uses. | 00:14:17 | |
| The Georgetown Township provides opportunities for conservation subdivision design. | 00:14:19 | |
| Utilizing smart growth to allow for compatibility and uses. | 00:14:23 | |
| Along a major arterial corridor. | 00:14:27 | |
| The next slide shows. | 00:14:30 | |
| Sort of a colored. | 00:14:32 | |
| Rendering of the site. | 00:14:33 | |
| The yellow are the are the lots. | 00:14:35 | |
| The lots are proposed to be in conformance with your RU standard, which is 50 by 120. | 00:14:37 | |
| As allowed under the conservation regime. | 00:14:43 | |
| The green spaces are. | 00:14:46 | |
| Outside the right of way would be open space. | 00:14:48 | |
| And the mustard colored would be the recreational. | 00:14:50 | |
| Open space. | 00:14:54 | |
| You can see the proposed signage. | 00:14:55 | |
| In the lower right hand corner there. | 00:14:58 | |
| It is all single family detached residential. There's no attached. | 00:14:59 | |
| That's all. Same family detached. | 00:15:03 | |
| Next slide. | 00:15:05 | |
| This is the density calculation allowed under your ordinance for conservation subdivision. | 00:15:08 | |
| So. | 00:15:13 | |
| Contingent upon the zone change, we're proposing 53 single family lots. | 00:15:14 | |
| They would have 20 foot front yard setbacks, 5 foot side yards, 10 foot rears. | 00:15:19 | |
| When you take the gross square footage. | 00:15:24 | |
| Divided by the by right Rs. | 00:15:26 | |
| That yields 50.86 lots. | 00:15:28 | |
| And then we can we're using the. | 00:15:33 | |
| The protecting county view shed from a road density bonus. | 00:15:36 | |
| Which allows up to 5% density bonus. | 00:15:40 | |
| That's where we get to the 53.4 lots. | 00:15:43 | |
| And then we're obviously using the. | 00:15:46 | |
| 3 So with the developers proposing is a horse board fence. | 00:15:48 | |
| Along the State Road 62 right of way. | 00:15:51 | |
| That would be landscaped as well. | 00:15:54 | |
| Which would perfect protect that view shed from from Hwy. 62 from through traffic. | 00:15:56 | |
| As well as to protect the view of the backyards. | 00:16:01 | |
| Of those houses that would be facing. | 00:16:04 | |
| 62 plus the green space that we're leaving there. | 00:16:06 | |
| The open space requirement is is 35%. | 00:16:10 | |
| We're actually providing 41.8. | 00:16:14 | |
| Overall green space. | 00:16:16 | |
| And then 22 acres for 34.2% of the green space is required to be. | 00:16:17 | |
| It could. I think it says public recreation space. | 00:16:25 | |
| So the intent there would be to rehab the existing pond that's there. | 00:16:27 | |
| We're going to use that pond as our detention basin. | 00:16:31 | |
| But we're going to keep it as. | 00:16:33 | |
| As a lake. | 00:16:36 | |
| For an amenity feature. | 00:16:37 | |
| And there would be walking trails. | 00:16:39 | |
| Benches, those kind of things in that. | 00:16:40 | |
| Public recreational areas. | 00:16:42 | |
| Let's see. | 00:16:44 | |
| Next slide Discovery is a well established company. They've been around since. | 00:16:47 | |
| 1992. | 00:16:51 | |
| You can see a list of other projects that they've done and you Albany. | 00:16:53 | |
| Bridal Wood. Muirfield. Trinity Run. | 00:16:56 | |
| Windsor Creek. | 00:16:59 | |
| In Charlestown, they've done Hawthorne, Glen Hux Landing. | 00:17:01 | |
| Henryville Champions Point. | 00:17:05 | |
| A heavy Commons in Jeffersonville. | 00:17:09 | |
| Crown Chase. Plum Run. | 00:17:11 | |
| And West Monaco run in solid burn. | 00:17:14 | |
| So it is a well established firm. | 00:17:16 | |
| The next slide you can see examples of their other projects. | 00:17:18 | |
| The sides of buildings finish the finishes within a whole. | 00:17:22 | |
| They're a very, again, a very high quality builder. | 00:17:26 | |
| So, so the last slide for smart growth. | 00:17:31 | |
| Your ordinance, your stormwater ordinance, is very stringent. | 00:17:35 | |
| And obviously we have to. | 00:17:39 | |
| Comply with that and Chief. | 00:17:40 | |
| Achieve approval of the stormwater plan. | 00:17:43 | |
| Prior to any development of the site. | 00:17:46 | |
| So storm water and drainage control would comply with the Floyd County storm water ordinance. | 00:17:48 | |
| Sanitary sewer connections would comply with the requirements of Georgetown Utilities. | 00:17:52 | |
| I understand there's some concern in in Woodbridge. | 00:17:56 | |
| Would bridge with this the way their sewers are? We'll need to work with the town of Georgetown town. | 00:18:00 | |
| Obviously make sure we're not making that any worse than it is. | 00:18:04 | |
| Maybe that will help. | 00:18:07 | |
| Help alleviate any problems that those residents are having. | 00:18:09 | |
| The proposal adheres to the Comprehensive. | 00:18:12 | |
| Planned goals and visions for growth areas within the county. | 00:18:15 | |
| The Georgetown Township provides opportunity for conservation subdivision design utilizing smart growth to allow for compatibility | 00:18:19 | |
| and uses along. | 00:18:22 | |
| The 62 corridor. | 00:18:25 | |
| The proposed use of single family residential is consistent with current conditions. | 00:18:28 | |
| Of the area. | 00:18:32 | |
| And with that, we'd be happy to answer any questions. | 00:18:33 | |
| Yeah, Jason, you were. | 00:18:36 | |
| Uh, at the meeting we had. | 00:18:39 | |
| Technical Review. | 00:18:41 | |
| Yes. | 00:18:43 | |
| You were thinking that, Sir, is. | 00:18:43 | |
| On a different. | 00:18:45 | |
| Pressure line correct? I don't know the answer to that I think. | 00:18:46 | |
| Typically when Georgetown develops, especially out in these areas, they're putting in low pressure sewers. | 00:18:51 | |
| Woodbridge may have originally been. | 00:18:57 | |
| Approved on septic. | 00:19:00 | |
| In which case they may have actually. | 00:19:01 | |
| So. | 00:19:03 | |
| There's a there's a Lips station at Edwardsville Trace that we designed. | 00:19:04 | |
| That pumps along the back of Woodbridge and out to the system in Porter Ridge Rd. | 00:19:07 | |
| Georgetown system. | 00:19:13 | |
| They may have allowed people to tie in Woodbridge to tie into that force main. I don't know the answer to that. | 00:19:15 | |
| If so, it might be a mix, it might be an incompatible. | 00:19:21 | |
| System because I don't know. | 00:19:24 | |
| Edwardsville Trace is what I would call a high pressure system. It's a lift station force main. | 00:19:28 | |
| In Woodbridge. | 00:19:33 | |
| If they're using the low pressure system. | 00:19:34 | |
| It may not be meshing, but we'll we'll have to work with Georgetown to figure that out. | 00:19:37 | |
| So we obviously. | 00:19:40 | |
| My clients have no desire to flood anyone's house either from. | 00:19:42 | |
| Stormwater or from sanitary sewers. | 00:19:46 | |
| But but. | 00:19:49 | |
| And as I explained in the neighborhood meeting. | 00:19:50 | |
| The development process is sort of a chicken and the egg. | 00:19:52 | |
| Thing. | 00:19:55 | |
| Our clients can't spend a lot of money solving other people's problems. | 00:19:56 | |
| Until they have approval. | 00:19:59 | |
| Right. | 00:20:01 | |
| So we need, we need to get past this meeting. | 00:20:01 | |
| And then we'll have to get a sanitary sewer permit. | 00:20:04 | |
| Stormwater permits all of those things. | 00:20:07 | |
| Before we could turn a blade. | 00:20:09 | |
| A spoonful of dirt on the side. | 00:20:11 | |
| We'll have to have all those approvals in place. | 00:20:13 | |
| And certainly before they could build a house. | 00:20:15 | |
| And then we would come back. | 00:20:18 | |
| To staff for secondary approval once we have all those things in place. | 00:20:20 | |
| So, umm. | 00:20:23 | |
| This is just the first step. | 00:20:24 | |
| And many things that we have to accomplish before we can actually. | 00:20:26 | |
| Develop the site. | 00:20:28 | |
| The roads, they'll, they'll be public, right? Dedicated to the county, yes. | 00:20:32 | |
| OK. And then one other question as far as the exterior of these. | 00:20:37 | |
| Are we talking a lot of violin? We talking? | 00:20:41 | |
| Hardy board we talked and brick. What are we talking about? So little to no vinyl. | 00:20:44 | |
| Sure. No, Yeah, please. | 00:20:50 | |
| Because we've approved some stuff and we go by afterwards and it's like all final. It's so embarrassing so. | 00:20:53 | |
| My name is Ethan. I'm the director of operations for Discovery. They will be brick and Hardy material. | 00:20:59 | |
| 01801 Augusta Blvd. You better say Sir to you. | 00:21:05 | |
| The only time we would use final would be a vinyl shake product and a Gable that looks just like a hearty shake product. But as | 00:21:11 | |
| far as the four sides of the home, thank you. Brick or stuff. | 00:21:16 | |
| Yep. | 00:21:23 | |
| All right. Any other questions for? | 00:21:25 | |
| The petitioner. Thank you, Jason. | 00:21:27 | |
| Thank you. Yeah. All right. At this time, we'll open up. | 00:21:29 | |
| The floor to anybody like to speak in? | 00:21:32 | |
| In favor of this project. | 00:21:35 | |
| Came forward please. | 00:21:38 | |
| We have 10 minutes allotted for you. Can you talk that long? | 00:21:40 | |
| State your name and your address. For the record, yes, my name is David Ernst Berger. | 00:21:48 | |
| And of course, I represent the family. | 00:21:53 | |
| There's eleven of us, you know, so there's quite a few. | 00:21:57 | |
| You know I my actual my address is 1118 Ross, Trevor Circle, Louisville, KY. | 00:22:01 | |
| OK. Thank you. | 00:22:07 | |
| So I'm not going to say much. It won't take 10 minutes. | 00:22:09 | |
| Umm, other than. | 00:22:12 | |
| You know, we could have gone with a developer that was in. | 00:22:14 | |
| A national, you know, developer. | 00:22:17 | |
| We didn't want that. | 00:22:20 | |
| No one in the family wanted that. | 00:22:22 | |
| We wanted somebody we felt like was a quality. | 00:22:25 | |
| Builder in this community. | 00:22:28 | |
| That knew the community and his name. | 00:22:30 | |
| On what the products and the communities they they build. | 00:22:33 | |
| And we feel like we. | 00:22:39 | |
| Have that. | 00:22:40 | |
| With this development group. | 00:22:42 | |
| Were highly in favor of the. | 00:22:45 | |
| Conservation, easement or conservation? | 00:22:48 | |
| Style of development. | 00:22:51 | |
| 40% of. | 00:22:54 | |
| Green space was really important to the family. | 00:22:55 | |
| And so we feel like this is going to be a good development. | 00:23:00 | |
| A brother of ours lives in. | 00:23:05 | |
| You know, a home. | 00:23:08 | |
| By this developer. | 00:23:09 | |
| It's quality home. | 00:23:11 | |
| It's about the same comparable size and price. | 00:23:13 | |
| What's going to be put in here? | 00:23:16 | |
| So. | 00:23:18 | |
| We. | 00:23:19 | |
| You know, wanted to let you know that the whole family does. | 00:23:20 | |
| In fact, favor. | 00:23:23 | |
| This development. | 00:23:24 | |
| And these developers? | 00:23:26 | |
| So. | 00:23:28 | |
| How long is your family on that property? | 00:23:28 | |
| Oh goodness, 1959, is that right? | 00:23:31 | |
| You're gonna be there when they start excavation. Be sure they don't dig up anything you buried. | 00:23:33 | |
| So anyway, they they promise to keep a lot of trees and that's what we want. | 00:23:42 | |
| Thank you. | 00:23:47 | |
| OK. Anybody else would like to speak in favor come forward? | 00:23:50 | |
| Last call. | 00:23:56 | |
| All right, at this time we turn it over to anybody that wants to speak in opposition. | 00:23:57 | |
| Of the project. | 00:24:02 | |
| Come forward. | 00:24:03 | |
| State your name. | 00:24:06 | |
| And your address. | 00:24:08 | |
| My name's Joe Ruttle. I live at 963 Unawan Lane. | 00:24:13 | |
| I have two acres of property there. | 00:24:17 | |
| And it borders. | 00:24:19 | |
| What they're building right now. | 00:24:21 | |
| Just a slow footnote. | 00:24:23 | |
| The the meeting, the informational meeting that was Wednesday last week. | 00:24:25 | |
| I got my notice Monday for that meeting. I've not got one for this. I know what's going on. | 00:24:29 | |
| But I've not gotten any paperwork on it to see. | 00:24:34 | |
| What they're doing, I ain't got nothing. | 00:24:36 | |
| I did get a letter in mail on the day I was home. | 00:24:38 | |
| And they didn't give it to me or they didn't come up to my house. But I, I just want to let you know I've not received nothing. | 00:24:41 | |
| And you did state your name. I'm sorry. I was talking to the attorney. You stated your name and address. Joseph Brooke. | 00:24:46 | |
| 963 you know online OK sorry we just want to make sure that if you're not getting noticed that you. | 00:24:51 | |
| You need to be sure you're on. I've got one of them but it was 2 days before the meeting and I didn't get nothing for this. | 00:24:57 | |
| OK, OK. | 00:25:02 | |
| I know I can't stop progress but I'm telling y'all. | 00:25:04 | |
| Water comes across my property like there's no tomorrow, right? It washes me out and. | 00:25:07 | |
| It all started. | 00:25:13 | |
| Honest goodness when he put the apartments in. | 00:25:14 | |
| Yeah, down the road. | 00:25:16 | |
| Well, let me let me make you feel uncomfortable because I won't tell you, Mr. Cooperate stated this. | 00:25:17 | |
| Floyd County has these strictest. | 00:25:23 | |
| Storm water. | 00:25:26 | |
| Requirements. | 00:25:27 | |
| It's bigger than Louisville, KY MSD. | 00:25:28 | |
| And they usually I will tell you 9 times out 10. | 00:25:31 | |
| Now this is when they get done. | 00:25:34 | |
| I'm not talking about existing situation. | 00:25:36 | |
| But when they get done, you'll have. | 00:25:38 | |
| Less water coming from that property than what was coming from the property now. So I'd like to give you some pictures I got from | 00:25:40 | |
| my driveway. Welcome but it but we this is this. | 00:25:44 | |
| This doesn't really. | 00:25:49 | |
| We appreciate that, but I guarantee you. All right, thank you. | 00:25:50 | |
| What we want to do? | 00:25:54 | |
| Any number to the record, all right. | 00:25:55 | |
| Totally. | 00:25:58 | |
| It worse is my problem. I mean it just it's, it's gotten worse. I've been there 30 years. | 00:25:59 | |
| I used to have a ditch. | 00:26:04 | |
| That I could step across. | 00:26:05 | |
| Now I'm, no, I'm over, but I can't run a jump across it now, right? It just gets bigger and bigger and it keeps the road in my | 00:26:07 | |
| property more and more every time. | 00:26:11 | |
| And it comes right through the middle of my property. | 00:26:15 | |
| Well, we'll have Mr. Cochran wait when he comes back up to address your concerns, if you don't mind, We'll do that. | 00:26:17 | |
| And then? | 00:26:23 | |
| Like I said, the fact that I didn't get the notice in this meeting. | 00:26:25 | |
| Was kind of my other neighbors have and they've told me about it, right? | 00:26:28 | |
| And then we're glad you're here. | 00:26:32 | |
| Yeah. And and I, I would like to and I heard some of the percentages without seeing it on the map. | 00:26:35 | |
| 50 The runoff first of all from. | 00:26:41 | |
| Two houses is going to be a lot. | 00:26:43 | |
| That's a lot of water with it. | 00:26:46 | |
| Roofs and roads. | 00:26:48 | |
| And it's all coming towards me. | 00:26:50 | |
| And then once it leaves me. | 00:26:51 | |
| It crosses, you know, 1. | 00:26:53 | |
| And I can't. | 00:26:55 | |
| State for a fact, but I've talked to the county. | 00:26:56 | |
| The Park Highway department down there and there's a new guy in there now, but the previous guy said. | 00:26:59 | |
| That the strains is there now it's not big enough. | 00:27:03 | |
| To cross the road, it goes up over the road. | 00:27:06 | |
| Right when? | 00:27:08 | |
| On heavy rains, but it goes over the road on two or three different places. | 00:27:09 | |
| So that's my biggest concern. | 00:27:14 | |
| Well, we thank it and we'll have Mr. Copper weight address that on the train. It's for you. | 00:27:16 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:27:20 | |
| Definitely not boring. | 00:27:21 | |
| Next Gordon. | 00:27:23 | |
| I understand it. | 00:27:25 | |
| I just want to confirm that we do have a receipt that it was mailed. | 00:27:26 | |
| Whether it was delivered is really up to the post office, OK. | 00:27:35 | |
| All right, all right, next. | 00:27:39 | |
| In opposition in my left. | 00:27:44 | |
| You can do it man. | 00:27:50 | |
| It don't take anything really just. | 00:27:52 | |
| Just state your name and address. My name is Andrew Fulkerson. I live at 865. | 00:27:55 | |
| You know, one lane. | 00:28:01 | |
| The back of that neighborhood. | 00:28:03 | |
| Our potential neighborhood would be the. | 00:28:06 | |
| Side back of my property. | 00:28:09 | |
| There is. | 00:28:12 | |
| Trees that. | 00:28:13 | |
| I'm pretty much bored and. | 00:28:15 | |
| I have a shop back there and I keep my camper and stuff and. | 00:28:17 | |
| My only concern is. | 00:28:21 | |
| If we open all that up. | 00:28:25 | |
| Potential for vandalism. | 00:28:28 | |
| People still on my things. | 00:28:30 | |
| I just don't like. | 00:28:33 | |
| No one. It's that open. It's kind of probably the way I have it right now and I feel protected. | 00:28:35 | |
| And I just. | 00:28:41 | |
| Don't want vandalism or kids coming back there or getting hurt on my property. | 00:28:43 | |
| I have little ones and I'm just worried about some kid coming back there and getting hurt. | 00:28:47 | |
| So if I could hear of some type of. | 00:28:52 | |
| Way they could keep. | 00:28:56 | |
| Somebody from getting hurt or if they put a fence back there or something. | 00:28:58 | |
| I'd be happy with it. | 00:29:02 | |
| But it's. | 00:29:04 | |
| I'm worried about the safety. | 00:29:05 | |
| More than anything. | 00:29:07 | |
| Thank you. All right. Thank you, Sir. | 00:29:09 | |
| Come forward, Mr. Barley. | 00:29:16 | |
| Steve Byerly, 872 Yenawine Lane, Georgetown, IN. | 00:29:24 | |
| I kind of feel we're seeing. | 00:29:31 | |
| I kind of feel like I don't want to. | 00:29:34 | |
| Jump on. | 00:29:36 | |
| The wagon here and say I'm against it. | 00:29:38 | |
| Because I. | 00:29:42 | |
| Probably be a hypocrite. | 00:29:43 | |
| I've I've probably built more of these subdivisions or helped build more of these subdivisions and. | 00:29:46 | |
| The wealth, in fact, they know I work for Dan Christianity back in the year today. | 00:29:50 | |
| 43 years so I've I've seen him go in. | 00:29:55 | |
| I know how they go in and how they go out. | 00:29:58 | |
| I am concerned about the water. | 00:30:02 | |
| But. | 00:30:04 | |
| I know. I know how that works. I know how it. | 00:30:05 | |
| I know how. | 00:30:11 | |
| How they? | 00:30:12 | |
| The drainage. | 00:30:12 | |
| It's supposed to work. | 00:30:13 | |
| Now, and, and I, in fact, I'm probably going to be the inspector on this job. | 00:30:15 | |
| Because. | 00:30:20 | |
| I'm below. | 00:30:22 | |
| Joe So I get. | 00:30:23 | |
| I'll get I get a lot of water. | 00:30:25 | |
| But the county you know, you know it has nothing to do with probably, probably with the Herst burgers on that property other than. | 00:30:27 | |
| I hope that we don't get. | 00:30:35 | |
| Have that problem but county has not. | 00:30:36 | |
| Address the problem of the of the drainage. | 00:30:41 | |
| But that's that's not your problem. | 00:30:43 | |
| I mean, that's that's not so. | 00:30:46 | |
| I I just want and and the traffic. | 00:30:49 | |
| Yes, horse traffic's bad. | 00:30:51 | |
| Everywhere. | 00:30:53 | |
| So I can't. | 00:30:54 | |
| I can't show you this. I can't say that it's going to get it would be worse back. | 00:30:56 | |
| And that is a high traffic area and it's had a lot of accidents there. | 00:31:01 | |
| Frank, I think, you know, there's a lot of accidents out that way, so. | 00:31:06 | |
| I'm just gonna leave it at that because. | 00:31:10 | |
| They're I cleaned their pond out. | 00:31:13 | |
| I clear youth falls in pond out years ago so I know what's in there and there will be a lot of turtles in there. | 00:31:17 | |
| All right, thank. Thank you, Steve. | 00:31:23 | |
| Alrighty. | 00:31:27 | |
| I do have one question. | 00:31:30 | |
| You can come up, just state your name and address for the record again. So we got you. | 00:31:32 | |
| Jose Joseph Rattle, you know my mind. | 00:31:38 | |
| So if it does, if it does get approved. | 00:31:40 | |
| Are there going to be like they work on it? | 00:31:43 | |
| They're gonna have hours where they work. | 00:31:45 | |
| You know, like. | 00:31:47 | |
| 8:00 to 4:30 not. | 00:31:48 | |
| Rundown so I hear Bulldogs at 10:00 night. | 00:31:50 | |
| I've done part of the other side that isn't about my girlfriends right next to the park. | 00:31:53 | |
| I've heard him over there. | 00:31:57 | |
| And on weekends, are they going to be running? | 00:31:59 | |
| Putting the streets in stuff they're going to be. | 00:32:02 | |
| Probably just Tuesdays and Thursdays between 10:00 and 2:00. | 00:32:04 | |
| Sets the tea schedule. | 00:32:10 | |
| I just I mean, you're gonna. | 00:32:12 | |
| I just can't come out there on Saturday and Sunday and. | 00:32:14 | |
| I'd say that whatever if county does have some kind of ordinance, they'll have to abide by the ordinance is what I would say. I, I | 00:32:17 | |
| don't, and I don't know what that is, I'll be honest with you. | 00:32:21 | |
| Yeah, but it's noted. | 00:32:25 | |
| Thank you, Sir. | 00:32:27 | |
| There is a noise ordinance, but it does not include construction. There you go. | 00:32:28 | |
| Amen. | 00:32:33 | |
| My name is John Berry. It's Barrie. | 00:32:39 | |
| I own a property at 887 Yenawine. | 00:32:43 | |
| I'm not pro or. | 00:32:46 | |
| Against. | 00:32:48 | |
| Because I don't like information. | 00:32:49 | |
| I never got the 1st. | 00:32:51 | |
| Cutter for the first informational meeting. | 00:32:52 | |
| I got this one. | 00:32:56 | |
| And when the first general was speaking. | 00:32:57 | |
| He kept saying next slide, next slide. These monitors never changed. | 00:33:00 | |
| So I have no idea what he was looking at. | 00:33:04 | |
| Or we was, you know, talking to. | 00:33:06 | |
| Just for the record. | 00:33:08 | |
| The the rainwater. | 00:33:11 | |
| Stormwater drains for everywhere to call it. | 00:33:12 | |
| Is an issue. It's a major issue. | 00:33:15 | |
| And a lot of driveways along that, the yellow line. | 00:33:17 | |
| Path there. | 00:33:21 | |
| Are cracked up and broken because of this. | 00:33:22 | |
| Transition. | 00:33:26 | |
| So I'm just looking For more information to look at. Like I said, not pro, not against. | 00:33:29 | |
| The trees Outback are nice. | 00:33:35 | |
| It's it's a great scenery and. | 00:33:38 | |
| I just need more information, more communication. | 00:33:41 | |
| Understand what the plan is. | 00:33:44 | |
| Going forward. | 00:33:47 | |
| So I'll leave it at that. | 00:33:48 | |
| So I'll give you something. This is yours. | 00:33:51 | |
| If the water issue Steve. | 00:33:55 | |
| Steve, is the water issue. | 00:33:59 | |
| The whole length of Vienna wine. | 00:34:03 | |
| Or is it halfway so I can have somebody go out there and look? | 00:34:06 | |
| Yeah, well, not full blank because. | 00:34:13 | |
| Once it gets down to card. | 00:34:15 | |
| Right. So between Cordon Ridge. | 00:34:17 | |
| Between Cordon Ridge and 62 is where I should have them look at it. | 00:34:20 | |
| I'll, I'll have the engineer go out there with stormwater Guy and look at it. | 00:34:24 | |
| Let's see if we can dig a big hole or something. | 00:34:30 | |
| I know you're good. | 00:34:35 | |
| Alright, we still got a few minutes left. Or is it difficult time out we time down. | 00:34:39 | |
| OK, All right. Was there anybody else that wants to speak in opposition? | 00:34:43 | |
| If you make it fast, I'll let you come. If not, we'll close it. | 00:34:47 | |
| That's it. We can't let Mr. Copperweight, you want to come up and give us a 5 minutes rebuttal and. | 00:34:50 | |
| I guess what I want to hear is. | 00:34:55 | |
| Definitely your response on the drainage for sure. Want to hear that and then I'd like to hear. | 00:34:57 | |
| What kind of buffer they're thinking about maybe coming up with for the I think that was, was that Mister Fulbers who said that? | 00:35:02 | |
| Yeah, Mr. Focus. So, So on the drainage, as I mentioned earlier, Boyd County has the most stringent drainage ordinance around. | 00:35:09 | |
| But what we have to do is show that we are not increasing. | 00:35:17 | |
| From this project. | 00:35:20 | |
| We are not increasing. | 00:35:22 | |
| Post development. | 00:35:24 | |
| Runoff. | 00:35:25 | |
| Greater than pre development. | 00:35:26 | |
| For the two, the 10 and the 100 year storm. | 00:35:28 | |
| And we actually are very, again very stringent requirements. | 00:35:30 | |
| The review is very stringent. | 00:35:34 | |
| It's again, it's just very tough. | 00:35:38 | |
| And I gave them the analogy at the at the neighborhood meeting. | 00:35:40 | |
| That a detention basin, which is what will turn the pond into. | 00:35:43 | |
| Is basically like taking a glass. | 00:35:47 | |
| Drilling a hole in the bottom. | 00:35:49 | |
| No matter how fast you pour water in the top of the glass, it can only come out. | 00:35:51 | |
| As fast as that straw will allow it to do. | 00:35:55 | |
| We size that glass for 100 year storm. | 00:35:58 | |
| And it can only come out. | 00:36:01 | |
| At pre development 100 year storm. Great. | 00:36:02 | |
| Now once, once, once you get to 100 year storm, which is the cap in the ordinance, all bets are off. Everybody has problems at | 00:36:05 | |
| that point. | 00:36:08 | |
| But anywhere between? | 00:36:11 | |
| Zero and 100 years stolen. We're going to capture the runoff from this side. | 00:36:13 | |
| Run it through our detention basin. | 00:36:16 | |
| And release it. | 00:36:18 | |
| I did not promise them that we would make it better. | 00:36:19 | |
| Oftentimes you see that detention basins make downstream issues better. | 00:36:22 | |
| I can't say we're going to make it better. | 00:36:26 | |
| But I can definitely say we're not going to make it worse. | 00:36:28 | |
| As far as the traffic. | 00:36:31 | |
| This is an in dot control facility, State Road 62. | 00:36:33 | |
| I don't know if you got the e-mail from them, but it would get an e-mail from them. | 00:36:37 | |
| They have again, a stringent review. They're talking about left turn lanes. They may have right turn lanes. | 00:36:42 | |
| We at least will have to make ingress and egress to the neighborhood. | 00:36:48 | |
| 6. | 00:36:51 | |
| Through traffic. That's just through traffic. | 00:36:53 | |
| Your Your ordinance requires a traffic study for anything. | 00:36:56 | |
| That accesses the collector and arterial. | 00:36:59 | |
| 75 vehicle trips per day. | 00:37:02 | |
| A subdivision is roughly 1 vehicle peak hour. | 00:37:05 | |
| Or one vehicle per lot. | 00:37:08 | |
| One peak hour trip per lot. | 00:37:10 | |
| So 53 lots doesn't rise to 75. | 00:37:12 | |
| So that's why we didn't have to do a traffic study. | 00:37:16 | |
| But. | 00:37:18 | |
| But 50 three additional. | 00:37:18 | |
| Trips in an hour on 62 is is that drop in the bucket? | 00:37:21 | |
| Compared to what's already on 62. | 00:37:25 | |
| So I don't think you'll see appreciable. | 00:37:27 | |
| Different appreciable difference there. | 00:37:29 | |
| As far as the buffer. | 00:37:31 | |
| And I failed to mention this. | 00:37:33 | |
| Earlier. | 00:37:35 | |
| One of my favorite things about conservation subdivisions. | 00:37:35 | |
| That I like to do. | 00:37:39 | |
| Is pull the lots in from the outer boundary. | 00:37:40 | |
| So that all of these lots, none of the lots proposed here, touch an adjacent property. | 00:37:43 | |
| There is. | 00:37:48 | |
| 20 at least a 20 foot wide and I believe we have 25 feet of space. | 00:37:49 | |
| From the back of any lot to the. | 00:37:54 | |
| Our intention is to leave as many of those trees. | 00:37:57 | |
| In that area. | 00:38:00 | |
| As we can. | 00:38:01 | |
| The only thing might be is if. | 00:38:02 | |
| Along the edge of a lot. | 00:38:04 | |
| We might put a detention or a Swale in to convey water to the detention basin. | 00:38:05 | |
| So if there's a tree that's sort of straddles the lot line. | 00:38:10 | |
| That might have to come out but in that buffer. | 00:38:13 | |
| There's really no reason for us to take those trees out. | 00:38:15 | |
| Does that answer your questions? Very much so. | 00:38:19 | |
| OK. | 00:38:22 | |
| Again, if you have any questions for me, I'd be happy to answer. Any questions for Mr. I'll just have one I hadn't heard. | 00:38:23 | |
| We always hear this talk of affordability. What's the price point of these homes? | 00:38:29 | |
| And it's not your question to answer what we what we talked about at the neighborhood meeting. | 00:38:33 | |
| Mr. Hammond mentioned 400. | 00:38:37 | |
| Plus, I said 375 just to give him a little bit of grace, 375. | 00:38:39 | |
| To 500. | 00:38:44 | |
| I can't say that this neighborhood is affordable. | 00:38:46 | |
| But what? But what additional housing stock at that price point does? | 00:38:48 | |
| Is it frees up housing? Cheaper housing stock? | 00:38:52 | |
| Right. So if somebody's in a $200,000 house. | 00:38:55 | |
| And they decide to move up to a $400,000 house. | 00:38:57 | |
| Now their house is available for someone else that's more affordable. | 00:39:00 | |
| And it cascades down the line. | 00:39:03 | |
| OK. | 00:39:05 | |
| Any other questions? | 00:39:07 | |
| Is this gonna be catch? | 00:39:09 | |
| In stormwater. | 00:39:10 | |
| The drains or is it all released? Yeah, the the streets themselves will have catch basins. | 00:39:12 | |
| Yes. And then that will all be conveyed to the detention basically. | 00:39:17 | |
| Drainage is just a big thing. | 00:39:24 | |
| Sure. | 00:39:26 | |
| Always is. | 00:39:27 | |
| You know, traffic's right. | 00:39:28 | |
| I've talked to Georgetown, they said the sewers won't be any problem. | 00:39:30 | |
| They check with their engineer and. | 00:39:35 | |
| So that's not a big problem. | 00:39:37 | |
| I guess one more question I have is the all the common areas, 41% of the lot you saw the property says. | 00:39:40 | |
| Common area? Yes. Is the HOA gonna take care of that common area? Yes. | 00:39:45 | |
| Because sometimes they won't give it to the county. We really don't. We're not taking it. | 00:39:50 | |
| And we really don't want it. | 00:39:54 | |
| So the HOA, we take care of all the common area, OK. | 00:39:56 | |
| All righty. | 00:40:01 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 00:40:03 | |
| All righty, All righty. | 00:40:05 | |
| Can I take one second, Mr. | 00:40:07 | |
| Yeah, Mr. Fulkerson, just as a. | 00:40:10 | |
| Thought if you have concerns about people crossing through that barrier, you Indiana does have a purple paint law. | 00:40:12 | |
| So if you know you're lying, you can't put purple paint on the trees. | 00:40:17 | |
| Just to help mark that. | 00:40:20 | |
| If that is a concern of yours. | 00:40:22 | |
| Yeah. | 00:40:26 | |
| Not blue. | 00:40:28 | |
| It's gonna be purple. | 00:40:29 | |
| Hey, Jason, could you mind coming back up just a second? | 00:40:32 | |
| Do you think your applicant would agree as a condition? | 00:40:39 | |
| That the final no vinyl except what he as he stated. | 00:40:42 | |
| It's a written commitment. Written commitment, sure. | 00:40:46 | |
| What's the? | 00:40:49 | |
| Makes typical Max on file. | 00:40:50 | |
| 30 square feet. 50 square feet. | 00:40:52 | |
| OK, OK, OK, that's good. They can do a commitment more than 100 square feet of. | 00:40:57 | |
| As a condition. | 00:41:09 | |
| Written commitments, it's generally like he said, it's going to be shake on the. | 00:41:11 | |
| On the Gables. | 00:41:15 | |
| Yeah, yeah. I mean, otherwise you're gonna have to. Yeah. We want to ride by when we improve these. You want to ride by when they | 00:41:16 | |
| built and be proud of them too. We just. | 00:41:20 | |
| The vinyl just. | 00:41:24 | |
| Yeah, it's moving. | 00:41:28 | |
| Remember that. | 00:41:30 | |
| Remember the houses we looked at in Nob Hill though that had. | 00:41:32 | |
| Even the Hardy was, yeah, great. Yeah. So there are vinyl products that are there, no doubt. And they proved that, too. | 00:41:35 | |
| Yeah, I think we approved that, didn't we, Nick? It's on, it's on our list approval, right? | 00:41:42 | |
| Right. | 00:41:46 | |
| Condition. | 00:41:47 | |
| Yeah, it's a high end. Bottle's got the, uh, star foaming behind it. | 00:41:51 | |
| It's like battle with it. | 00:41:56 | |
| The cost, they say, is very expensive, but. | 00:41:57 | |
| We they showed us Hardy and showed us that and. | 00:42:00 | |
| Right. Well, they already lost money in the house because he said 375. They said over 400. | 00:42:03 | |
| Thanks. Thank you. | 00:42:15 | |
| OK, this time close. | 00:42:17 | |
| And we we're looking for a ballot. | 00:42:20 | |
| Just see if I have one please. | 00:42:23 | |
| Please if I have that one. | 00:42:26 | |
| No. | 00:42:27 | |
| After checking. | 00:42:30 | |
| Docket FC02-206-05. | 00:42:36 | |
| Petitioners named Ernst Berger Planning Trust. | 00:42:40 | |
| Decision After careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission finds that number one. | 00:42:43 | |
| The rezoning of subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:42:49 | |
| Because the proposed subdivision meets the division of foite. | 00:42:53 | |
| Is the vision for growth areas by locating development in close proximity to both sanitary sewers and primary. | 00:42:57 | |
| Arterial transportation corridors. | 00:43:04 | |
| While preserving natural features. | 00:43:06 | |
| This is a land of the principles of smart growth. | 00:43:08 | |
| By having smaller lots which requires less infrastructure per unit for the community to maintain and is in the land with | 00:43:12 | |
| conservation development design associated with. | 00:43:16 | |
| Randall Arnett. | 00:43:21 | |
| Arthur, a rule by design. | 00:43:22 | |
| #2 the rezoning of subject property. | 00:43:24 | |
| Is consistent with the current condition and the character of current structures and uses of in the area because. | 00:43:27 | |
| Other single family residential developments occurred. | 00:43:33 | |
| Just to the north. | 00:43:36 | |
| Of the site. | 00:43:38 | |
| With Sadie Akers and Woodbridge Farms. | 00:43:39 | |
| To the West is Cherry Grove and to the east is Prairie. | 00:43:42 | |
| Just West of. | 00:43:46 | |
| Of Gary Craven Park is another conservation shop so division that was approved in 2024. | 00:43:47 | |
| As a conservation subdivision, this development would intentionally. | 00:43:53 | |
| Preserve contiguous portions of the. | 00:43:57 | |
| Existing tree canopy. | 00:44:00 | |
| And landscape. | 00:44:02 | |
| #3 The rezoning of subject property is necessary for the most desirable use. | 00:44:04 | |
| Of the land because this development is intended as a conservation subdivision. | 00:44:08 | |
| It will provide an. | 00:44:12 | |
| Alternative housing option to the county while preserving natural features. | 00:44:14 | |
| The smart growth vision outlined in the Comprehensive plan encourages A compact building design. | 00:44:18 | |
| Creating a range of housing opportunities and choices. | 00:44:24 | |
| And preservation of open space and natural beauty. | 00:44:27 | |
| Development is encouraged. | 00:44:30 | |
| To concentrate in the areas with sanitary sewer access and is. | 00:44:31 | |
| In proximity to primary artillery transportation corridors. | 00:44:35 | |
| #4 the rezoning subject property. | 00:44:39 | |
| Will not be interest to the. | 00:44:41 | |
| Of other properties in the in the area because the conservation subdivision will preserve approximately 42% of the development. | 00:44:43 | |
| As usual, recreation open space. | 00:44:50 | |
| Or retain natural features. | 00:44:53 | |
| Constructed homes are intended to be built to a housing price comparable to other newly constructed homes in the area. | 00:44:55 | |
| #5. | 00:45:02 | |
| Rezoning of subject proper. | 00:45:05 | |
| Property. | 00:45:07 | |
| Will support reasonable growth and development in the area because the proposed rezoning follows smart growth principles. | 00:45:08 | |
| And is consistent with the county paying documents. | 00:45:14 | |
| And nearby land use such as. | 00:45:16 | |
| Gary Craven Park, the Edwardsville Gateway District and residential uses. | 00:45:18 | |
| At adequate infrastructure is available nearby. | 00:45:23 | |
| And can be brought to the properties. | 00:45:27 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby makes. | 00:45:30 | |
| A favorable recommendation. | 00:45:34 | |
| On the petitioner of rezoning Amendment application at the meeting held on the 9th of March, 2026. | 00:45:36 | |
| A favorable recommendation is made based on the following. | 00:45:42 | |
| Commitment. | 00:45:45 | |
| Disapproval is contingent upon the approval of the proposed conservation subdivision that completes my ballot. | 00:45:46 | |
| Already we have a ballot. I need a second. | 00:45:54 | |
| I'll second. | 00:45:57 | |
| Thank you for writing that. | 00:45:57 | |
| Yes, Sir. Any discussion? | 00:45:59 | |
| None all right. Sorry. Just for clarification though. | 00:46:02 | |
| You guys had asked the applicant if they were willing to. | 00:46:05 | |
| Add a written commitment in there regarding siding as well. | 00:46:09 | |
| You OK? | 00:46:13 | |
| You want on the. | 00:46:14 | |
| Subdivision. | 00:46:16 | |
| On the zoning change. | 00:46:17 | |
| On the zoning. | 00:46:19 | |
| So it needs to be on this one, OK? | 00:46:23 | |
| All right, so we do have a additional. | 00:46:24 | |
| Written, sorry. | 00:46:28 | |
| Yeah. | 00:46:33 | |
| Are you going to want to see that as a recorded zoning commitment? Yeah, recorded. | 00:46:35 | |
| Yes, yeah. | 00:46:41 | |
| OK, that can help you with that if. | 00:46:42 | |
| They haven't my applicant or my client hasn't closed on the property. | 00:46:46 | |
| Does that need to be in the that'll be in the need need to be in the name of the current owner then. Is that right? | 00:46:50 | |
| Yes. Or when are they planning on closing? | 00:46:54 | |
| When all the other approvals are in place, probably. Cart, horse, horse, right? A few months probably. | 00:46:59 | |
| Yeah, yeah. You want a recorded zoning commitment prior to the commissioner meeting? | 00:47:07 | |
| OK. | 00:47:12 | |
| I just want to be clear on that, Yeah. And I can help you with that if you need help with it if you don't have Giraffe, but OK. | 00:47:12 | |
| Just reach out to me. | 00:47:18 | |
| Appreciate it. | 00:47:19 | |
| So we had an addition. | 00:47:20 | |
| So I have amended. | 00:47:22 | |
| The condition #2 Building material no more than 100 square feet of final per house. | 00:47:24 | |
| I need I'll still 2nd that I need a second on the amendment. | 00:47:31 | |
| And all in favor any additional discussion? | 00:47:35 | |
| All in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:47:39 | |
| Thank you. | 00:47:42 | |
| All right, we need a ballot. | 00:47:43 | |
| I'm going the other way first. | 00:47:51 | |
| Thank you. | 00:47:54 | |
| Do you have a chance to have a copy that I could get? | 00:47:57 | |
| Copy of. | 00:48:02 | |
| Everything I got. | 00:48:08 | |
| From the working but yeah. | 00:48:09 | |
| What's this document? | 00:48:10 | |
| This is this one's alone. | 00:48:19 | |
| I thought Chris said 5 pages long people. | 00:48:21 | |
| Did you have a balance? | 00:48:24 | |
| Oh, I thought you did. | 00:48:25 | |
| FC O2-206-06 Applicant Ernst Berger, Planning Trust. | 00:48:31 | |
| Number one, petitioner has met all the following requirements. | 00:48:38 | |
| A preliminary plan provided be. | 00:48:41 | |
| Certification demonstrating compliance with IBEM Rule 5C. Plat provided to defend identifying all pertinent informations. | 00:48:44 | |
| Pursuant to the. | 00:48:52 | |
| SCO and the Floyd County Planning and Zoning. | 00:48:54 | |
| Commission rules. | 00:48:58 | |
| What procedure? | 00:49:00 | |
| Items DE and F are not applicable. | 00:49:01 | |
| G site plan provided that shows tough. | 00:49:04 | |
| Topographic. | 00:49:06 | |
| Wetlands with flood hazard areas, steep slopes. | 00:49:07 | |
| Install shown on having. | 00:49:11 | |
| As having several limitations of program. | 00:49:14 | |
| H Lots All lots comply with the Floyd County zoning. | 00:49:19 | |
| Requirements. | 00:49:22 | |
| Sorry about that. | 00:49:24 | |
| #2. | 00:49:26 | |
| All lights are not laid out along existing. | 00:49:27 | |
| Arterioles collectors are local streets. | 00:49:31 | |
| #3 all lots meet the link requirements of the SEO. | 00:49:34 | |
| Item I. | 00:49:39 | |
| Streets. Streets comply with dimensional geographic standards of the SEO #2 traffic. | 00:49:44 | |
| Common measures are identified where more than. | 00:49:50 | |
| 35 are proposed #3 Any public streets serving the subdivision meets the SCL surface type. | 00:49:53 | |
| And right away requirements #4 All streets are named. | 00:49:59 | |
| Five. There are not. | 00:50:03 | |
| Any permanent dead end streets or private streets? | 00:50:05 | |
| 6 Indiana Department of Transportation approval. | 00:50:09 | |
| Has been received from Maple Dr. intersection with Hwy. 62. | 00:50:12 | |
| #7 curbs and gutters conform to the Indiana dot standard specifications or equivalent standards as determined by the County | 00:50:16 | |
| engineer. | 00:50:20 | |
| Jay driveways, intersection entrances. | 00:50:24 | |
| Number one. | 00:50:27 | |
| The proposal does not provide. | 00:50:28 | |
| Two subdivision entrances required. | 00:50:30 | |
| For a 50 or more life subdivision, however, the developer will. | 00:50:33 | |
| Meet this requirement by providing a single entrance with two lanes, each 16 foot wide. | 00:50:37 | |
| Separated by landscape meeting at least 12 foot wide, extending for a distance of 100 feet. | 00:50:42 | |
| #2 Driveway separation meets the requirements of the SCO. | 00:50:48 | |
| #3 All driveways intersection are located in accordance with the SEO. | 00:50:52 | |
| OK, sidewalk. Sidewalks will be prevented. | 00:50:56 | |
| On both sides of the subdivision streets. | 00:50:59 | |
| #2 is pedestrians. | 00:51:02 | |
| Access will be provided to any park common space recreation. | 00:51:04 | |
| Facility. | 00:51:08 | |
| Located in the subdivision. | 00:51:09 | |
| #3. | 00:51:12 | |
| Protective covenants will assign the obligations for the maintenance and repair of sidewalks and trails to the Lot Lot Owners | 00:51:13 | |
| Association. | 00:51:17 | |
| How convenient covenants will be consistent with the SCO? | 00:51:22 | |
| #2 Petitioner has provided certification to meet the following requirements for drainage and storm water. | 00:51:25 | |
| Hey at the NR approval will be obtained for. | 00:51:31 | |
| Alterations to the natural drainage pattern and natural stream patterns caused by construction of the subdivision. | 00:51:35 | |
| B. Any drainage system will be in. | 00:51:41 | |
| Meets the minimum standards of the SCO. See drainage reports will be provided. | 00:51:44 | |
| D Final drainage plans are required prior to secondary approval. | 00:51:50 | |
| #3 Petitioner has provided a letter confirming availability and willingness to serve. | 00:51:54 | |
| For all necessary utilities, water, sewage, fire. | 00:51:59 | |
| And electric #4 petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer and septic service. | 00:52:03 | |
| A service for the subdivision lights. | 00:52:09 | |
| Will be extended to an IDEM approved municipal or county owned. | 00:52:11 | |
| For Cooperative sanitary sewer. | 00:52:16 | |
| B is not applicable. | 00:52:18 | |
| Decision upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereback grants. | 00:52:22 | |
| Introduce your primary approval. | 00:52:26 | |
| For major subdivisions. Meeting held on the 9th of March 2026. | 00:52:28 | |
| Primary approval is based on a completion of the filing condition. | 00:52:33 | |
| Final approval of drainage and stormwater. | 00:52:36 | |
| Approval by Indiana dot for subdivision Rd. connection. | 00:52:39 | |
| And an update to the entrance for Section 3 point. | 00:52:42 | |
| You know of the subject control ordinances required prior to the secondary approval? | 00:52:46 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 00:52:52 | |
| I'll second that ballot. All right, we have a second any. | 00:52:55 | |
| Had discussion. | 00:52:59 | |
| All in favor signify by aye. | 00:53:01 | |
| Those opposed likewise. | 00:53:03 | |
| You are past. Thank you very much. | 00:53:06 | |
| Okay. | 00:53:12 | |
| We'll wait while we're getting this sign and if you guys want to leave and we'll get our next docket up here. | 00:53:14 | |
| Umm, Frank, you wanna go forward? | 00:53:19 | |
| And big on this one. We did the original survey work on this a couple years ago, so I'm going to recuse myself from this, all | 00:53:23 | |
| right? | 00:53:26 | |
| All right, agenda item number 2. | 00:53:31 | |
| I gave it to Christy. | 00:53:39 | |
| Wait just a second. | 00:53:43 | |
| Hey guys, let a Jason. | 00:53:46 | |
| Can you all go out in the hall so we can continue on? Thanks, I appreciate it. | 00:53:48 | |
| Oh, no problem. | 00:53:53 | |
| Thank you guys. | 00:53:54 | |
| All right, go ahead, Frank. This is a agenda item FC-2. | 00:53:58 | |
| 02-206-07. | 00:54:02 | |
| Zoning map amendment, go ahead. Thank you. | 00:54:05 | |
| So petitioners taking grants on behalf of Troy Streaking. This is located at 5386 Napleton Road and 5390 Navalton Rd. | 00:54:07 | |
| The request is a zoning map amendment. The zoning district currently is rural residential requesting neighborhood commercial. | 00:54:15 | |
| Applicant is requesting A zoning map amendment to rezone 2 properties from rural residential to neighborhood commercial located on | 00:54:21 | |
| .65 acres. Properties are located at the corner of Napleton Road and Brown Street, just off of the US 150. | 00:54:28 | |
| These properties are adjacent to a previously approved zoning map amendment that changed the zoning from RR to NC with docket. | 00:54:34 | |
| Hold on just a second. | 00:54:41 | |
| We we gotta. | 00:54:42 | |
| We got to get to order here. We can't. | 00:54:43 | |
| I made DD man I can't take all one time. | 00:54:46 | |
| Yeah, hold on just a second. | 00:54:49 | |
| All right, go ahead, continue. | 00:54:51 | |
| Applicant is requesting A zoning map amendment to rezone 2 properties from Rural Residential RR to Neighborhood Commercial NC | 00:54:54 | |
| located on 0.65 acres. | 00:54:58 | |
| Properties are located at the corner of Napleton Road and Brown Street, just off of US150. | 00:55:02 | |
| These properties are adjacent to a previously approved zoning map amendment that changed the zoning from RR to NC with Docket | 00:55:07 | |
| FC-0519-17. | 00:55:12 | |
| And was approved with the following written commitments. | 00:55:17 | |
| Any future development will be required to be connected to a sanitary sewer system. | 00:55:19 | |
| The future commercial use of this property must be compatible and complement the adjoining residential properties. | 00:55:23 | |
| Buffer yard standards will be required and all all signage will meet county standards. | 00:55:28 | |
| The zone amendment is to accommodate a proposed conceptual plan for a new 5000 square foot healthcare practitioner's office | 00:55:33 | |
| building. | 00:55:36 | |
| The conceptual proposal would still need an approved development plan. The site does not currently have approved sewer connection. | 00:55:39 | |
| For staff comments, the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan because. | 00:55:46 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property fits the character of adjoining parcels to the South, east and West. Future commercial land | 00:55:52 | |
| use will be directed towards the Galena area and the town of. | 00:55:56 | |
| Town of Greenville. | 00:56:01 | |
| Greenville Township page 50 of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:56:02 | |
| The site does not have approved sewer connection at this time, but development would require such a connection or variance before | 00:56:05 | |
| it could be approved. | 00:56:09 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the current conditions and the character of current structures and uses in | 00:56:12 | |
| the area because the rezoning of the subject property fits the character of adjoining parcels to the of the church to the West, | 00:56:16 | |
| the rezoned properties to the South. | 00:56:20 | |
| And the Jacobi gas station on US150. However, there are homes across Brown Street. | 00:56:25 | |
| Buffer yard standards will be required for commercial use if the amendment is approved. | 00:56:29 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land because. | 00:56:33 | |
| Subject property is located at a signal. | 00:56:38 | |
| Signalized intersection of a minor arterial US150 and major collector roadway. Napleton Rd. Property is located in a commercial | 00:56:40 | |
| node. | 00:56:44 | |
| Just Galita. | 00:56:49 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be injurious to the value of the property. | 00:56:50 | |
| Of the of the other properties in the area because subject property is located near other commercially zoned properties. | 00:56:54 | |
| And for Section 5.09 of the Floyd County zoning ordinance will require a Type 2 buffer yard. | 00:57:00 | |
| With an additional 15 foot set back with required landscape. | 00:57:06 | |
| Plantings and a berm or fence. | 00:57:09 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development in the area because subject property is | 00:57:11 | |
| located in an area designated for commercial growth and is located at a major signalized intersection. | 00:57:16 | |
| 2017 Vision, Floyd County Comprehensive Plan states. | 00:57:22 | |
| The community also has several smaller commercial areas. These areas provide local commercial needs for residents. These areas | 00:57:25 | |
| include the Ableton Rd. US150. | 00:57:29 | |
| Charlestown Rd. County Line Rd. | 00:57:33 | |
| Paoli Pike, Scottsdale Rd. And Cordon Pike. | 00:57:35 | |
| Small commercial activities presently occur in these vicinities and should continue. | 00:57:37 | |
| That's from the growth assessment. | 00:57:41 | |
| Or growth areas for commercial Page 43 of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:57:43 | |
| Or staff comments. The conceptual plan will need several modifications before submission as a development plan. | 00:57:47 | |
| And for staff recommendations written commitment to not develop without sewer connection. | 00:57:53 | |
| So I have to stop. | 00:57:58 | |
| On his. | 00:58:01 | |
| On his sketch. | 00:58:02 | |
| That the applicant is approved. I know this isn't. | 00:58:04 | |
| It's just a conceptual thing. | 00:58:07 | |
| Put the buffers on. | 00:58:09 | |
| Across the rear of the property. | 00:58:12 | |
| He doesn't bring that buffers on all the way. Doesn't he have to cover the whole? | 00:58:14 | |
| Or is it because there's a parking lot? I'm a little confused where. | 00:58:18 | |
| I. | 00:58:23 | |
| And I apologize because it's been a moment since I last looked at this, but the my understanding was that that buffer would have | 00:58:24 | |
| to go across the entirety. | 00:58:27 | |
| Across the entire back line. | 00:58:31 | |
| OK, so I'll be over right now. | 00:58:33 | |
| I have a question. | 00:58:36 | |
| This is not looking at fixing the light at 150 Napleton so there is an actual turn lane. | 00:58:37 | |
| Because it's coming from. | 00:58:43 | |
| The Firehouse if you if it was a medical building. | 00:58:45 | |
| Traffic's gonna get backed up 'cause you're not gonna be able to turn left during peak hours. | 00:58:48 | |
| Not going to return left at all. Hardly. | 00:58:53 | |
| Yeah, yeah, you can't. Hardly now anyway. | 00:58:55 | |
| But now for putting a facility there where people have to get there at a certain time. | 00:58:58 | |
| Huh. | 00:59:05 | |
| I don't have an answer for. | 00:59:06 | |
| That would be up to him that they would, they would conduct a study and determine whether it's warranted or not and they would | 00:59:19 | |
| install that. | 00:59:23 | |
| I just didn't know. I know and I was doing stuff, so I didn't know where we fell in. | 00:59:28 | |
| I mean, if they have looked at, I know they have looked at that light they looked at. | 00:59:32 | |
| Yes, it is. That would be determined. That's fine. Yeah. | 00:59:41 | |
| In this entrance, here is how much commercial traffic. | 00:59:46 | |
| Who is the Illinois? | 00:59:50 | |
| On the staff report. | 00:59:52 | |
| On the neighboring property that was previously approved. | 00:59:54 | |
| Have they got served? | 00:59:59 | |
| No, not at this time and development. | 01:00:01 | |
| Right, no development. | 01:00:05 | |
| But. | 01:00:09 | |
| Pardon me, where was that? | 01:00:11 | |
| That you're it's in his in his staff report overview the the adjacent property that received that researching the condition | 01:00:12 | |
| because it's a part of this conceptual. | 01:00:18 | |
| Plan uh, it is directly adjacent to several of the lots that they're requesting to be rezoned and included in the conceptual. | 01:00:24 | |
| Plan OK, so part of it was already rezoned and part hasn't so part of. | 01:00:32 | |
| OK has already been zoned neighborhood commercial. They're asking for a couple additional lots that are directed to adjacent and | 01:00:38 | |
| then they will have a single property. | 01:00:43 | |
| Where where the parking lot is has already been approved. | 01:00:48 | |
| Yeah, the back part. | 01:00:50 | |
| Where the detention basin and the building is, that's not in the approved. | 01:00:52 | |
| There are two additional lots, so there's two houses that have to be torn down and all that. | 01:00:57 | |
| And. | 01:01:02 | |
| Thanks. Switch it. | 01:01:04 | |
| Right. | 01:01:06 | |
| They had to run under 150 for sewer, correct? | 01:01:07 | |
| Would you say Frank? | 01:01:13 | |
| They had to run under 150 for sewers, so the state's going to be involved quite a bit. | 01:01:15 | |
| If you go forward with that. | 01:01:21 | |
| I would really caution you on the shrubbery that you put on that corner. | 01:01:23 | |
| Because you can't see now. | 01:01:28 | |
| And there's nothing there. | 01:01:31 | |
| There's everybody signs that does roofing. | 01:01:32 | |
| Yeah, I'm waiting. | 01:01:39 | |
| Just one more note, this is for the rezoning. We would have a full development interview look at. | 01:01:43 | |
| Are the entrances right? Turn lanes require all those things? | 01:01:49 | |
| Gotcha. | 01:01:56 | |
| Thank you. We got it. | 01:01:57 | |
| Thank you, Frank. | 01:01:59 | |
| All right, applicant, come forward, Mr. Grimes. | 01:02:01 | |
| State your name and address for the record. | 01:02:06 | |
| Yeah, Nathan Grams with Renaissance Design Build, 117 S Indiana Ave. Sullenburg, Indiana. | 01:02:08 | |
| You're representing Troy Segrell, who owns the NCLLC. | 01:02:14 | |
| And just kind of. | 01:02:19 | |
| Give you guys a little overview. I think you've discussed a lot of it already. | 01:02:23 | |
| The there's a total of 123. | 01:02:28 | |
| There's a total of 6 lots we're talking about here. | 01:02:35 | |
| I think 4 of them have already been rezoned in. | 01:02:38 | |
| And they're currently undeveloped. | 01:02:41 | |
| And there's a two that have housed on them or what we're. | 01:02:43 | |
| It owner owns them as well so we try to get the whole. | 01:02:46 | |
| Corridors or old group? | 01:02:50 | |
| Zoned the NC is what we're doing here. | 01:02:53 | |
| And I'm not sure he actually has a. | 01:02:55 | |
| Ten and four this year, did you? | 01:02:59 | |
| So it's not. | 01:03:01 | |
| So the entrances that are showing on here, all that in the parking lot, we're not, we're not. That's that's just. | 01:03:04 | |
| Yeah, I got you. So that you can get the right parking on it and a detention basin and. | 01:03:13 | |
| Landscaping in. | 01:03:18 | |
| Russian, we intend to meet your ordinances, whatever. | 01:03:20 | |
| Will abide by the sewer. | 01:03:23 | |
| So we don't want to get into all the answers and. | 01:03:25 | |
| One of the houses is these be torn out already. | 01:03:29 | |
| They're going to tear that down. The other house may come down later at this point time so. | 01:03:31 | |
| But anyway, we're trying to get the whole. | 01:03:36 | |
| Thing zoned NC. | 01:03:38 | |
| And like the staff report said. | 01:03:41 | |
| This meets all the criteria for the three criteria as you're. | 01:03:43 | |
| Need, and there's NC. | 01:03:47 | |
| To the left, to the right, across the street on 150. | 01:03:50 | |
| Everything's already in C, except across Brown Street. | 01:03:54 | |
| Thing and maybe the adjoiner. | 01:03:57 | |
| Down Brown Street, so. | 01:04:02 | |
| Does the applicant already own this property or is it under option? | 01:04:04 | |
| Yes. | 01:04:10 | |
| Any other questions? | 01:04:12 | |
| For Mr. Grams. | 01:04:14 | |
| No, I haven't had questions. | 01:04:16 | |
| Yeah, simple is good. | 01:04:20 | |
| After. | 01:04:24 | |
| PCA. | 01:04:26 | |
| OK. Thank you, Nathan, at this time. | 01:04:29 | |
| We opened up the floor name I want to speak in. | 01:04:34 | |
| Favor of this? | 01:04:37 | |
| Come forward. | 01:04:40 | |
| Do you have any more questions if you need to? | 01:04:41 | |
| What you gotta? | 01:04:44 | |
| I can't talk to you like that. I've got it. You got to state your name, right? All that's good stuff. Yeah. State your name and | 01:04:45 | |
| address. | 01:04:48 | |
| Troy Striegel, 4100, for sales Court. | 01:04:52 | |
| Only knows. Go ahead. You guys got any questions for the property? | 01:04:55 | |
| The there's one, there is one requirement. | 01:04:59 | |
| And I would probably add to this. | 01:05:02 | |
| Hopefully you don't have a problem, but. | 01:05:04 | |
| On Napleton Road I'd be asking for 30 foot or right away from Centerland. | 01:05:07 | |
| For county. | 01:05:14 | |
| Dedicated to the county. | 01:05:15 | |
| Yeah, we'll have to again. We'll try to meet anything you asked for. We just got to make sure it works for us as far as the | 01:05:19 | |
| development we're. | 01:05:22 | |
| Again, that medical was thrown out there. We don't have any idea what we're doing yet. | 01:05:25 | |
| We want to get approval, we want to start doing some site plans and figure it out from there. | 01:05:29 | |
| That that's pretty standard to go back to LA to make sure. | 01:05:32 | |
| For all those old, older county roads. | 01:05:37 | |
| Described. | 01:05:40 | |
| Yeah, it's almost a requirement, right? I mean. | 01:05:41 | |
| I mean, it's going to that scene. | 01:05:43 | |
| Yeah, should be easy enough. Do we need to write that in the conditions? OK, be written in the conditions. | 01:05:45 | |
| Are you in favor of this? | 01:05:52 | |
| Yes, how you are glad to hear that. | 01:05:55 | |
| Well, I figured that was the first part. The people that are in favor. | 01:06:00 | |
| There you go, Based on what you did. That's why I'll let you come up there. | 01:06:03 | |
| All right, now, anybody else in favor? | 01:06:07 | |
| Thank you. OK, Thank you. | 01:06:10 | |
| All right, that closes that portion. Let's open up for anybody in opposition. | 01:06:12 | |
| Sure, you all got lucky. | 01:06:18 | |
| How do I talk about? | 01:06:21 | |
| If that case is closed. | 01:06:23 | |
| Now I don't. | 01:06:25 | |
| You're welcome, Mr. Grimes, to come up and talk about anything. It was discussed in the. | 01:06:26 | |
| In the open comments Which? | 01:06:31 | |
| There were none. | 01:06:33 | |
| All right, so. | 01:06:35 | |
| Any other questions at that time, we're going to. | 01:06:37 | |
| Ask for a ballot. | 01:06:40 | |
| Please so we can get out of here for you. | 01:06:41 | |
| Mr. Evil Hazard, Mr. | 01:06:44 | |
| Yeah, somebody else praying. 1 next week, please Promise, promise me, promise. 2-206-07 Petitioner Nathan Grimes. | 01:06:48 | |
| Decision After careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission finds that one. | 01:06:56 | |
| Rezoning of subject property. | 01:07:00 | |
| Is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan because the rezoning of subject property fits the character of adjoining | 01:07:02 | |
| parcels. | 01:07:06 | |
| Through the Southeast and West. | 01:07:09 | |
| Future commercial land uses will be directed towards the Galena area. | 01:07:11 | |
| In the town of Greenville. | 01:07:15 | |
| The site does not have a. | 01:07:17 | |
| Approved sewer connection at this time. | 01:07:19 | |
| But development will. | 01:07:21 | |
| Would require such a connection or a variance before it can be approved. | 01:07:22 | |
| #2 the rezoning of the subject property. | 01:07:28 | |
| Is consistent with the current condition. | 01:07:31 | |
| And the character of current structures and uses in the area because it's rezoning of the subject property fits the character of. | 01:07:33 | |
| Adjoining proper. | 01:07:40 | |
| Parcels. | 01:07:41 | |
| Of the church to the West, the rezoned properties to the South, and Jacobi gas station on US150. | 01:07:42 | |
| Buffy Yard standards will be required for commercial use. | 01:07:48 | |
| #3 The rezoning of subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land because subject property is located at a | 01:07:52 | |
| signalized intersection. | 01:07:56 | |
| On a major on a manner arterially 150 and major collector roadway neighborhood and Rd. | 01:08:00 | |
| Property is located in a commercial note Galena. | 01:08:06 | |
| #4 the rezoning of the subject property will. | 01:08:11 | |
| Be interest to. | 01:08:14 | |
| Will not be interest to the value of other properties in the. | 01:08:15 | |
| Because subject property is located near the commercial. | 01:08:19 | |
| Leaves property. | 01:08:22 | |
| In persection, 5.09 of the FCCO will require type 2 buffer yard. | 01:08:24 | |
| With additional 15 foot set back required landscape planning. | 01:08:29 | |
| A burn or fence. | 01:08:34 | |
| #5 the rezoning of the subject property will. | 01:08:38 | |
| Support responsible growth and development in the area because subject property is located in area designated. | 01:08:41 | |
| For commercial growth and is located at a major signalized intersection. | 01:08:47 | |
| The 2017 Vision Floyd County Comprehensive Plan The community also has several smaller commercial areas. | 01:08:52 | |
| These areas provide local commercial needs. | 01:08:59 | |
| For residents, these areas include Naval and Road US150, Charlestown Rd. County Line Rd. Paoli. | 01:09:02 | |
| Pike and Scottsville Rowan carbon Pike smaller commercial activities presently can. | 01:09:08 | |
| Occur in these vicinities and should continue. | 01:09:13 | |
| Upon careful review, Floyd County Planning Commission hereby makes a favorable recommendation on the petitioners. | 01:09:17 | |
| Zoning Amendment Application That the meeting held on the 9th of March, 2026. A favorable recommendation is made based on the | 01:09:22 | |
| following written Commission. | 01:09:26 | |
| Conceptual plan will be modified. | 01:09:31 | |
| Before being submitted as a development plan #2A written commitment from the applicant is required to not develop without a sewer | 01:09:33 | |
| connection. | 01:09:37 | |
| #330 foot right away from center line and Ableton Rd. is required. | 01:09:41 | |
| Completes my balance. | 01:09:47 | |
| We have a second. Any further discussion? | 01:09:48 | |
| Uh, just a note that's, that's not in Greenville, it's in Floyd Knobs. | 01:09:51 | |
| I don't know if it's important. | 01:09:57 | |
| But it's in Floyd now. | 01:09:59 | |
| Do we need to change anything? | 01:10:03 | |
| Get your lovely Excuse me, that'd be Lafayette Township. | 01:10:05 | |
| Nope, that's in Greenville Township, but it's. | 01:10:10 | |
| Not in Greenville. | 01:10:13 | |
| Number one. | 01:10:15 | |
| E-mail Township. | 01:10:17 | |
| Revealed to Handship is Right. | 01:10:19 | |
| Excuse me, Greenville Township is right. Greenville Township. | 01:10:21 | |
| Is correct. I thought you said Greenville town, he says. | 01:10:25 | |
| That don't it, it doesn't say Township. I can adjust the word. It's a typo. Like I said, I don't know if it's important or not, | 01:10:30 | |
| but it is important. | 01:10:33 | |
| You caught something. | 01:10:37 | |
| It's the investigator come in. | 01:10:40 | |
| Yeah, there you go. | 01:10:41 | |
| Amended. | 01:10:43 | |
| All right, you want to read the amendment, please. | 01:10:45 | |
| Just read. Just read the line. I don't care just what out of it is. | 01:10:47 | |
| Future commercial land I would just say with a noted change area and the. | 01:10:52 | |
| Greenville Township, is that what you want? There you go. Just want to rewritten. | 01:10:56 | |
| Reread for the record. | 01:11:00 | |
| OK, Christy's over kicking me. | 01:11:01 | |
| All right, the amended. | 01:11:06 | |
| Beth, you want to make a second on the amendment, whoever made the second? | 01:11:08 | |
| I'll make the motion on the 2nd to. | 01:11:12 | |
| Any further discussion? | 01:11:14 | |
| None all in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:11:16 | |
| It passes. Don't nobody leave. | 01:11:21 | |
| We have nothing else on the. | 01:11:23 | |
| She does just. | 01:11:26 | |
| Changing the June 8th meeting and that Nick's going to send out Nick, Angela Frank will send out an e-mail to pull everybody on | 01:11:30 | |
| the options for June. | 01:11:34 | |
| All right, you'll be getting noticed from Nick. | 01:11:38 | |
| Within 90 days. | 01:11:49 | |
| And the written commitments will need to be recorded. | 01:11:51 | |
| Prepared, recorded and. | 01:11:54 | |
| Ready to go prior to? | 01:11:56 | |
| By statute, we have 90 days from certification. | 01:12:02 | |
| I certify. Oh, I gotta have it. | 01:12:07 | |
| I was going to have him send it while you why you closed up. OK, that's good. | 01:12:09 | |
| Good, good. All right. | 01:12:13 | |
| What are we? | 01:12:15 | |
| We clear to go, Frank and Nick. | 01:12:16 | |
| We good to adjourn. | 01:12:19 | |
| **** good, right? | 01:12:20 | |
| Make a motion to adjourn. Motion. | 01:12:23 | |
| Make a motion to adjourn. Second motion. Second. All in favor signify by. | 01:12:25 | |
| Alright, see y'all next month. | 01:12:31 | |
| Thank you, Floyd County. | 01:12:33 | |
| Sure. | 01:12:35 | |
| Alright. | 01:12:36 |