Floyd County Plan Commission
Live stream not working in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| Call to order the Floyd County Planning Commission. | 00:00:00 | |
| At this time, we like to stand and do the pledge allegiance, please. | 00:00:03 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag. | 00:00:07 | |
| For the United States of America. | 00:00:10 | |
| And to the Republic for which it stands. | 00:00:12 | |
| One nation under God. | 00:00:14 | |
| Indivisible. | 00:00:16 | |
| With liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:17 | |
| All righty. | 00:00:20 | |
| Thank you very much. At this time we have roll call. | 00:00:22 | |
| Here. | 00:00:29 | |
| Here. | 00:00:31 | |
| Here. | 00:00:33 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:38 | |
| Connie Moon here. | 00:00:40 | |
| Here. | 00:00:44 | |
| That's it. OK. | 00:00:46 | |
| And I just like to welcome. We've got 2 new members on the board. | 00:00:48 | |
| Connie Moon, welcome. And Dale Backshall, thank you guys. Appreciate you coming on board with us. | 00:00:51 | |
| Thanks a bunch. | 00:00:57 | |
| OK at this time. | 00:00:58 | |
| I'm going to turn the. | 00:01:00 | |
| Table over to Christie for the election of officers. | 00:01:03 | |
| OK. So for the election of officers, you'll be dealing with voting on a President and Vice President this evening. So the first | 00:01:06 | |
| order of business will be a motion for president. | 00:01:10 | |
| I'll make a motion for President Victor Andrew. | 00:01:15 | |
| OK, there's a motion for Victoria Unruh to serve as president of the Planning Commission. Is there a second? | 00:01:18 | |
| I'll second. | 00:01:22 | |
| OK. Second all in favor. | 00:01:23 | |
| Aye, any opposed? | 00:01:25 | |
| OK. I'll turn it back over to Mr. Unruh. | 00:01:27 | |
| You can't oppose. I'm sorry. There you go. | 00:01:30 | |
| OK, this increase in your paycheck. Yeah, for sure. | 00:01:32 | |
| All right, this time I'd like to see if there anybody on the board would like to volunteer. | 00:01:36 | |
| To be the vice. | 00:01:41 | |
| Chair, Vice President, in the event of my absence, and I will tell you I will not be here. | 00:01:43 | |
| Next month so I'll be in upfront. Candid SO but I need a volunteer. | 00:01:48 | |
| I fall in tear if nobody else will. | 00:01:56 | |
| OK, Dominic, Connie. All right. There you go. We got a nomination. I need a second. | 00:01:59 | |
| I'll second that you got a second all in favor signify by. | 00:02:04 | |
| Aye, anybody opposed likewise. Thank you. All right now we got. | 00:02:07 | |
| Go ahead. | 00:02:11 | |
| OK. | 00:02:15 | |
| Now we have to. | 00:02:16 | |
| Two people. | 00:02:19 | |
| To the BCA. | 00:02:20 | |
| At this time, Larry is serving. | 00:02:21 | |
| As a member from the Plant Commission. | 00:02:24 | |
| And I'm serving on the BC as a Planning Commission. | 00:02:26 | |
| From the Commission. | 00:02:29 | |
| I'm willing to continue, and Larry is too, but if somebody else is? | 00:02:31 | |
| Just destined to want to do that. | 00:02:34 | |
| Let me know and I will give up my spot and Larry probably would too, but. | 00:02:37 | |
| OK time. It doesn't work for me so doing a great job. Then we need a motion. | 00:02:42 | |
| I'll make a motion that. | 00:02:47 | |
| Victor Unruh and. | 00:02:48 | |
| Larry People, Hauser represent us in the BCA. | 00:02:49 | |
| I got a second too fast. Oh gosh. | 00:02:52 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 00:02:56 | |
| Aye, opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:02:59 | |
| All right now. | 00:03:01 | |
| We need 5 members. | 00:03:03 | |
| From. | 00:03:05 | |
| The the Plan Commission. | 00:03:07 | |
| To serve on the plat committee. | 00:03:10 | |
| And one alternate is what Nick told me. Is that correct? | 00:03:12 | |
| OK, so. | 00:03:15 | |
| Right now. | 00:03:16 | |
| I know Larry myself. | 00:03:18 | |
| Chris, Gina. | 00:03:22 | |
| And Mr. Mr. Frank Worth Saunders, that correct? | 00:03:25 | |
| So that's 123. | 00:03:28 | |
| OK, OK, it's 5 so so that's five. I need an alternate. | 00:03:32 | |
| You need alternate. | 00:03:37 | |
| An alternate, I don't think's ever been utilized, but it needs to be appointed. Just I'll be I'll be the alternate. OK, that's all | 00:03:40 | |
| too good. | 00:03:43 | |
| OK, we have. | 00:03:49 | |
| Gina, Mr. Brankworth, Mr. Welch. | 00:03:50 | |
| Mr. Bieber has a Mr. Andrew are the five with Frank Loop being the alternate. I need a motion so move as presented. | 00:03:53 | |
| All right, all in favor, I need a second, second. | 00:04:00 | |
| Any discussion on favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise OK, Thanks guys. | 00:04:03 | |
| All right, this time. | 00:04:09 | |
| I'd like to turn it over to Christy. She's just got some organizational and and the procedural things she wants to go over for the | 00:04:11 | |
| public. | 00:04:15 | |
| About the minutes. Oh well. | 00:04:19 | |
| I guess we could do the minutes. | 00:04:21 | |
| Let's get the minutes out of the way. I need a motion for the minutes on December 8th. | 00:04:23 | |
| Is there any discussion beforehand? | 00:04:28 | |
| I'll make a motion that we accept the minutes from December 8th. OK, we have a motion a second. | 00:04:30 | |
| I'll second we have a second all in favor signaled by the aye. Those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:04:36 | |
| Yeah, he abstained and Connie will abstain. Obviously they weren't at the meeting. | 00:04:42 | |
| You got that? | 00:04:46 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. Now we'll turn over Christy for a procedure. | 00:04:47 | |
| Perfect. Thank you. So just to kind of go over the process of the Planning Commission before we start calling agenda items. | 00:04:51 | |
| And for some of you in the audience that were at the BCA meeting, you already heard this, so I apologize, but going over this so | 00:04:57 | |
| that everybody understands how we handle the business before the Planning Commission. So the first thing that will occur is the | 00:05:02 | |
| president of the Board, Mr. Unruh, will read the agenda item that will be covering. | 00:05:07 | |
| Thereafter, the staff will present a staff report and compliance with any items that needed to be complied with. | 00:05:13 | |
| Thereafter, the applicant or the petitioner will have 10 minutes to present their application and their request to the Planning | 00:05:19 | |
| Commission Board. | 00:05:23 | |
| From there, board members may ask the petitioner and applicant questions if they wish to at that point in time. | 00:05:27 | |
| After that, public comments will be opened where those in favor and those in opposition will have an opportunity to speak. We go | 00:05:33 | |
| those in favor first. | 00:05:37 | |
| So everybody in the room that's in favor and wants to speak, we'll have 10 minutes. That's 10 minutes in total, not 10 minutes. | 00:05:41 | |
| Per person. | 00:05:47 | |
| And those in opposition will then speak next when called for, and that will also be a 10 minute section for all those in | 00:05:49 | |
| opposition to the application. | 00:05:53 | |
| The board can't expand those time periods, if appropriate, and that would be discussed at that point in time. | 00:05:58 | |
| After that, the petitioner will have 5 minutes to come back up for rebuttal of any comments that were made or to answer any | 00:06:04 | |
| questions that were made. | 00:06:07 | |
| By the. | 00:06:11 | |
| People in favor or in opposition. Thereafter, the board will have an opportunity to discuss the case. | 00:06:12 | |
| In a motion and ballot will be presented by one of the board members for consideration and voting by the board. | 00:06:17 | |
| All right. Thank you, Christy. At this time, what I'd like to just we have agenda item 1. | 00:06:23 | |
| And it was tabled. | 00:06:28 | |
| Has been pulled. | 00:06:29 | |
| And what I'd like to do is I'd like for the. | 00:06:31 | |
| The representative for the petitioner to come forward. | 00:06:33 | |
| To see if we can put all these together, if you approve of that. Is that correct? | 00:06:36 | |
| On 2 through 5, yes. | 00:06:40 | |
| Going back to the table, Adam, I'd just like to state that we are tabling that to the next regularly scheduled meeting. | 00:06:43 | |
| At their request. At their request, next we need a motion on the. | 00:06:48 | |
| We we can do one for you all to have a motion to approve the applicants request to table that to the next meeting which is | 00:06:53 | |
| February. | 00:06:57 | |
| Bear with me one second. February 9th. | 00:07:03 | |
| OK, I need a motion. | 00:07:07 | |
| I move the table as per request. | 00:07:10 | |
| 2nd. | 00:07:12 | |
| 2nd I have a second. | 00:07:13 | |
| Any conversation. | 00:07:15 | |
| All in favor signify by those opposed likewise Thank you. | 00:07:16 | |
| All right at this time. | 00:07:21 | |
| If the petitioner. | 00:07:24 | |
| Representative would come forward. | 00:07:26 | |
| State your name and your address. I got a question for you so if you will. | 00:07:28 | |
| Good afternoon. I'm John. | 00:07:36 | |
| Yeah, sorry. Good afternoon. I'm John Campbell with Heritage Engineering. | 00:07:37 | |
| Here representing. | 00:07:42 | |
| JC Food Stores on behalf of the Kroger Company. | 00:07:44 | |
| The address is. | 00:07:49 | |
| And I should know this, I've been here for. | 00:07:51 | |
| 12 years now 603 N Shore Dr. Ste. 204, Jeffersonville, IN. | 00:07:54 | |
| 40471. | 00:08:00 | |
| 3030 OK, So the question I have for you. | 00:08:03 | |
| Is do you have a problem with this? | 00:08:09 | |
| Putting item Agenda item 234. | 00:08:11 | |
| And five altogether. | 00:08:14 | |
| And we'll present them as one, but we will vote on them. | 00:08:16 | |
| Individually, do you have a problem with that? | 00:08:20 | |
| I do not, I did prepare the presentation with stop points, but I'm I can make the presentation in order and then vote at the end | 00:08:22 | |
| or answer questions. Thank you very much. | 00:08:27 | |
| At this time, I asked Nick to come forward with the staff reports, please. | 00:08:33 | |
| OK so we will do FC 12254243. | 00:08:41 | |
| 45. | 00:08:50 | |
| 44 and 45. | 00:08:53 | |
| Which are zoning map amendment? | 00:08:56 | |
| Major subdivision request and two development plan. | 00:08:58 | |
| And applications. | 00:09:02 | |
| As mentioned, this is for the petitioner JC Food Stores. | 00:09:05 | |
| Care of the Kroger Company. | 00:09:09 | |
| Pertaining to the vacant land behind the current JC Food store between Hwy. 150 and Tribe Rd. | 00:09:12 | |
| The zoning district is a PUD residential urban. | 00:09:19 | |
| Based on they are requesting a general commercial. | 00:09:24 | |
| Zone. This is in the Highlander Point Overlay district. | 00:09:28 | |
| The applicant is proposing the development of the property and the three lots to include a grocery shopping center. | 00:09:34 | |
| Fuel station and a lot dedicated for detention. | 00:09:42 | |
| Lot A will be the lot of the grocery shopping center, which is 13.9 acres. | 00:09:46 | |
| And we'll have 122,000 square foot marketplace. | 00:09:53 | |
| Track B will be the. | 00:09:59 | |
| Location of the detention. | 00:10:02 | |
| Pond and. | 00:10:04 | |
| Open space, which is 1.49 acres and Lot C will be the proposed. | 00:10:07 | |
| Fuel station location, which will include nine pumps. | 00:10:13 | |
| And is 1.11 acre. | 00:10:17 | |
| Tracks A&C will be separated by a proposed connector Rd. connecting Schreiber Road to Hwy. 150. | 00:10:22 | |
| Where there will be a traffic signal. | 00:10:29 | |
| Traffic impact study. | 00:10:32 | |
| Has been. | 00:10:34 | |
| Included with this. | 00:10:36 | |
| For this project and was conducted by Strand. | 00:10:37 | |
| The design for the limited access break. | 00:10:42 | |
| Has been. | 00:10:45 | |
| Approved by NDOT. | 00:10:46 | |
| The final approval will come once the design of the intersection is complete. | 00:10:48 | |
| Which is federal? Which is a federally funded? | 00:10:53 | |
| And we received the notice to proceed on that engineering. | 00:10:56 | |
| This week. | 00:11:00 | |
| Technical Review Committee was conducted for this project on October 23rd, 25. | 00:11:02 | |
| And likewise, A plat committee was held. | 00:11:10 | |
| December 16th, 2025. | 00:11:13 | |
| The applicant has requested several variances development standard variances for the project, primarily focused on lot A, but | 00:11:17 | |
| also. | 00:11:21 | |
| Applicable to the other lots and some. | 00:11:25 | |
| Cases. | 00:11:28 | |
| These are for facade building materials, external sidewalks along Hwy. 150, the internal sidewalks and. | 00:11:29 | |
| Total signage. | 00:11:37 | |
| A substantial amount of the property was originally. | 00:11:39 | |
| Add that all of those did receive approval at the BZA earlier tonight. | 00:11:43 | |
| A substantial amount of the property was originally zoned General Commercial, with a small portion to the north. | 00:11:50 | |
| Zoned residential, Urban. | 00:11:57 | |
| It was approved to be rezone to a planned unit development with underlying RU zoning for a mixed-use development that includes | 00:11:59 | |
| residential, urban. | 00:12:03 | |
| Homes and commercial lots along 150 and that was FC 03/22/17. So that was just a few years ago. | 00:12:08 | |
| Staff comments regarding the rezoning. | 00:12:16 | |
| The rezoning of a subject property is consistent with Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:12:19 | |
| Vision Floyd County prescribes following smart growth principles for development. | 00:12:25 | |
| With the following paramount principles preserving open space and farmway and natural gravity and critical environmental areas. | 00:12:30 | |
| Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities and to foster distinctive, attractive communities with strong sense | 00:12:37 | |
| of place. | 00:12:40 | |
| The proposal is adjacent to Hwy. 150. | 00:12:45 | |
| And intersection 64 and is adjacent to the Highlander Point Center. | 00:12:48 | |
| The will direct and strengthen development towards existing communities. | 00:12:53 | |
| It is located in the Highlander Point commercial growth area. | 00:12:57 | |
| Design guidelines for the overlay district as well as commercial development guidelines. | 00:13:01 | |
| From the Floyd County zoning ordinance, foster attractive and distinctive developments. | 00:13:06 | |
| Additionally, the property will substance was substantially zoned General commercial before the rezoning. | 00:13:11 | |
| For mixed-use development. | 00:13:18 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the current conditions of the in character of current structures. | 00:13:21 | |
| And uses in the area because the property is adjacent to the Highlander point. | 00:13:28 | |
| To highlight a point where the current JC store is located, large scale commercial and strip commercial is located there. | 00:13:33 | |
| Rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land. | 00:13:40 | |
| The property was initially substantially zoned general commercial. | 00:13:46 | |
| It is an economic growth area identified in the comp plan. | 00:13:50 | |
| It is ideally located near the Interstate and along Hwy. 150. The tract is large available. | 00:13:53 | |
| Is the large tract available? Is particularly suited for large shopping center and ancillary services such as fuel stations. | 00:14:00 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be interest to the value of the properties in the area. | 00:14:08 | |
| The rezoning is consistent with the original zoning. | 00:14:13 | |
| Of the property which is not injurious to nearby properties. | 00:14:17 | |
| Road use is consistent with long term and historic planning for the area. | 00:14:20 | |
| And the rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development. The proposed rezoning follows smart | 00:14:25 | |
| growth principles, is consistent with nearby land uses and planning documents. | 00:14:31 | |
| Adequate infrastructure is available nearby and can be brought to the property. | 00:14:36 | |
| Staff recommended conditions would. | 00:14:42 | |
| A written commitment. | 00:14:44 | |
| Property owner will commit to working with the County on the Limited Access right away break permit. | 00:14:46 | |
| The property owner will pay any required fee for the increased property value for these properties charged by and dot. | 00:14:51 | |
| Where other state agencies? | 00:14:58 | |
| As agreed to by the county. | 00:15:00 | |
| The next application is a. | 00:15:04 | |
| Major subdivision application. | 00:15:07 | |
| Staff review for this is that the petitioner has provided A preliminary site plan. | 00:15:14 | |
| In Platt, the traffic impact study was completed and provided adequate level of service once the intersection at Hwy. 150 is | 00:15:19 | |
| completed. | 00:15:24 | |
| The Soil and preliminary site report was completed for FC 3/22/17 for this property and indicated there was not a need for a phase | 00:15:29 | |
| one environmental. | 00:15:33 | |
| Were a geotechnical report and there are no wetlands or flood hazards present. | 00:15:38 | |
| Lots meet size standards for general commercial zone with access from new roads and drives. | 00:15:44 | |
| And the new public street is compliant with county standards. | 00:15:49 | |
| But needs to be named. | 00:15:53 | |
| A private access easement is needed to for the drive. Access to Lot C connection to the new public street is prohibited. | 00:15:56 | |
| As it will interfere with the intersection with Hwy. 150. | 00:16:03 | |
| Approval of the limited access break is pending with. | 00:16:08 | |
| Sidewalks. | 00:16:12 | |
| Provided throughout the development on either side of the public. Right away. Protective covenants should be provided for | 00:16:13 | |
| maintenance of sidewalks. Regional retention. | 00:16:18 | |
| Private access easement. | 00:16:22 | |
| Use in maintenance. | 00:16:24 | |
| The petitioners provided a preliminary plan for drainage. The development will utilize Lot B for. | 00:16:27 | |
| Retention Basin. | 00:16:33 | |
| Full drainage plane compliant with county stormwater regulations will be required prior to secondary approval. | 00:16:34 | |
| The petition. | 00:16:41 | |
| The petitioner will also need to provide documentation of declassification of the Blue Line stream from IDEM. | 00:16:42 | |
| DMV The petitioner has provided letters of service for the following utilities and services. Harrison RMC for electric Highlander | 00:16:49 | |
| fire District Fire Protection. | 00:16:54 | |
| Floyd Knobs Water Company for water, Center Point Energy for Gas and Clark Dietz has provided the letter from New Albany | 00:17:00 | |
| Wastewater. | 00:17:03 | |
| For sewer service. | 00:17:07 | |
| The petitioner has met the requirements of the. | 00:17:09 | |
| Subdivision control ordinance for wastewater. | 00:17:13 | |
| It provided the letter from. | 00:17:16 | |
| Clark Dietz stating that there is available infrastructure and capacity. | 00:17:18 | |
| Final approval of the connection will come from the City of New Albany. | 00:17:23 | |
| The New Albany municipal wastewater. | 00:17:28 | |
| This will was also confirmed at the TRC meeting. Staff recommendations for conditions. | 00:17:31 | |
| Prior to secondary approval, provide the following complete drainage plan. | 00:17:36 | |
| Provide documentation. Blue Lines stream has been classified, declassified from iodine and DNR. | 00:17:41 | |
| Update Plan to include an access easement for Lot C. | 00:17:47 | |
| Provide productive governance to include sidewalk maintenance and liability provisions. | 00:17:50 | |
| Private access, easement use and maintenance, and regional detection use and maintenance. | 00:17:55 | |
| Provide an easement to buffer the Creek to the northeast corner of the property, compliant with the design manual. | 00:18:00 | |
| Provide documentation of. | 00:18:07 | |
| Cooperation with Highlander Fire for the placement of fire hydrants. | 00:18:08 | |
| And provide a new street name. | 00:18:13 | |
| All right, on to the development plans. | 00:18:18 | |
| The first one is for the shopping center. | 00:18:25 | |
| As I mentioned, the petitioner has not met all the development standards for the district. | 00:18:29 | |
| The petitioner has requested for development standards variances that were granted. | 00:18:33 | |
| For signage. | 00:18:39 | |
| Building facade, internal and external sidewalks. | 00:18:41 | |
| Therefore, a waiver is required. | 00:18:45 | |
| The waiver would be consistent with the spirit and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:18:48 | |
| As it supports the development of the commercial growth area while on ensuring high quality designs. | 00:18:54 | |
| And the waiver is also consistent with the intent of the. | 00:19:12 | |
| Zoning district and Highlander overlay. The variances requested are not eliminating the required design elements, but modifying. | 00:19:16 | |
| To the unique circumstances of the property and the scale of the development. | 00:19:24 | |
| The development is a large scale commercial project located in the Highlander Point Overlay District and Growth area. There are | 00:19:34 | |
| sufficient infrastructure to support development. | 00:19:38 | |
| And has received several minor variances. | 00:19:44 | |
| Recommending. | 00:19:49 | |
| These. | 00:19:51 | |
| Buffer yard or. | 00:19:53 | |
| The fence raw material to be same material as primary structure as approved by staff. | 00:19:56 | |
| The plan showed wood. | 00:20:02 | |
| I would like to have a discussion with the developer we have. | 00:20:05 | |
| Typically required. | 00:20:08 | |
| Some masonry or vinyl or some some mix of materials for that element. | 00:20:10 | |
| When when the facade is entirely masonry. | 00:20:17 | |
| So the final application is FC-45 for the fuel station. | 00:20:24 | |
| All of the same development standards. | 00:20:34 | |
| Issues were presented in this case. | 00:20:37 | |
| With the exception, it did not require the development standard variances except for the. | 00:20:40 | |
| External sidewalk around 1:50. | 00:20:47 | |
| That's all. I just kind of summarized that last one because it's the same as as the shopping center. | 00:20:52 | |
| Do you have any questions for me before the applicant? | 00:20:59 | |
| Any questions for Nick from the board? | 00:21:03 | |
| I've got one. I kind of missed it. You'd mentioned the N dot right away Cut. You said that had been approved. We were. So the | 00:21:05 | |
| design of it has been approved. We have a letter from. | 00:21:09 | |
| Seymour office that they will prove it once we. | 00:21:14 | |
| Submit all the application materials for the permit. It's a substantial permit that takes a substantial amount of time. | 00:21:19 | |
| Some of those items will. | 00:21:27 | |
| Come from the preliminary engineering that we just started so. | 00:21:29 | |
| You know what? We'll receive it once we get everything in, but it'll take us several months to get everything in. | 00:21:34 | |
| OK. | 00:21:39 | |
| Has the stream officially been declassified? And we're just waiting on the letter or waiting for them to make the determination | 00:21:41 | |
| that it's been so? | 00:21:44 | |
| The applicants claimed that it was declassified. | 00:21:48 | |
| OK, so. | 00:21:51 | |
| We want to see the evidence of that. | 00:21:52 | |
| That's what we're What do we do if it's not been declassified? | 00:21:54 | |
| They haven't. They haven't met the condition, Yeah. | 00:21:58 | |
| They're dead. They'll have to come back. | 00:22:01 | |
| Yeah, it would be a different development. | 00:22:03 | |
| And I don't think that the rezoning is contingent on that. | 00:22:05 | |
| Good questions. Anybody else? | 00:22:11 | |
| Any more questions? | 00:22:12 | |
| Nick, thank you, Sir. | 00:22:13 | |
| All righty, at this time we'll call the. | 00:22:16 | |
| Applicant to come forward and state. | 00:22:19 | |
| Name and your address again for the record. | 00:22:22 | |
| Better remember this address system, Go ahead. | 00:22:27 | |
| Good evening John Campbell with Heritage Engineering. | 00:22:31 | |
| Address is 603 N Shore Dr. Ste. 204, Jeffersonville, IN 47130. | 00:22:35 | |
| I did put together as noted before, kind of. | 00:22:45 | |
| Break point presentation but I will just roll through it. | 00:22:48 | |
| And then a offer to answer any questions. | 00:22:52 | |
| So item number 2 on the agenda was the rezoning. | 00:22:58 | |
| I think next staff report. | 00:23:03 | |
| Clarified kind of what? | 00:23:07 | |
| What the previous zoning was, what the existing zoning is. | 00:23:09 | |
| We do want to. | 00:23:13 | |
| To rezone that or re. | 00:23:15 | |
| Kind of rezone it. | 00:23:18 | |
| Took mostly what it was before. Is that general commercial GC zoning? | 00:23:19 | |
| And that is to. | 00:23:24 | |
| Allow us to. | 00:23:26 | |
| Create a new public roadway through the property. | 00:23:27 | |
| Create the three lots with the development lot or the main primary lot being the proposed. | 00:23:30 | |
| JC Grocery and Fuel Center. | 00:23:36 | |
| Well, with the 2 two lots of that being the JC Grocery and the fuel center. | 00:23:39 | |
| And then that remaining lot being the. | 00:23:44 | |
| Dedicated area for open space and detention. | 00:23:47 | |
| And this is that zoning map. | 00:23:51 | |
| This actually had shown the old zoning. I just printed that out to capture how much of this total site was previously zoned | 00:23:54 | |
| General commercial. | 00:23:58 | |
| They're to the top of the page. Is the area that originally was. | 00:24:04 | |
| Are you zoning? | 00:24:09 | |
| Again, we want to rezone this to that commercial zone. It is in keeping with that kind of existing commercial node that you have | 00:24:11 | |
| there. | 00:24:15 | |
| Inappropriate for this area. | 00:24:20 | |
| Next item is the major subdivision. As previously mentioned, we're creating the three lots. | 00:24:24 | |
| The primary lot, lot 1 as it's noted on the actual. | 00:24:31 | |
| Subdivision. | 00:24:36 | |
| Flat. Commercial subdivision Flat. | 00:24:37 | |
| But it's actually noted as track day on the development plan is for the. | 00:24:40 | |
| Proposed JC Grocery. | 00:24:44 | |
| Which you can see there in Lot 1 Lot 2 which is noted as being track C on the development plan. | 00:24:47 | |
| Is they're kind of midpoint along Hwy. 150 and that is for the fuel center, the proposed fuel center. | 00:24:54 | |
| And then to the bottom of the page there is the track 3 or lot 3 which was noted as track. | 00:25:02 | |
| Be on our development plan. | 00:25:08 | |
| With the proposed Rd. A there. | 00:25:11 | |
| Connecting. | 00:25:14 | |
| Hwy. 150 to Schreiber Rd. | 00:25:15 | |
| Kind of separating lots 1 and 2 with the open space and detention lot being lot 3. | 00:25:18 | |
| We did prepare a. | 00:25:26 | |
| Development plans specific to the grocery that is for 123,000 square foot grocery. | 00:25:28 | |
| JC Grocery that will include internal to the store. | 00:25:36 | |
| A pharmacy. A wine and spirits section of the store. | 00:25:40 | |
| As well as a subtenant of a Starbucks. | 00:25:45 | |
| User It does have 547 parking spaces specific to the store. | 00:25:49 | |
| That lot does fully comply with the lot coverage requirements as well as the landscape planting requirements. | 00:25:55 | |
| So we are fully in compliance with that. | 00:26:04 | |
| And then as noted, the tension for that. | 00:26:07 | |
| Main store is on the. | 00:26:09 | |
| Off site open space lot which is lot 3 of that. | 00:26:12 | |
| Commercial subdivision plan. | 00:26:16 | |
| This is the overview of that showing the main grocery there. | 00:26:19 | |
| That grocery will face the new proposed Rd. A. | 00:26:23 | |
| We are providing the parking out front between Rd. A and the store. | 00:26:28 | |
| And then the detention across the way there. | 00:26:33 | |
| We did include in our submittal elevations of the store. | 00:26:38 | |
| As Nick noted, we did ask for a material variance, but just to be specific. | 00:26:43 | |
| The store does comply with the changing of materials, the banding requirements, all of the visual effects of that Highlander | 00:26:49 | |
| point. | 00:26:53 | |
| And the code requirements that the. | 00:26:58 | |
| The variance that we asked for was just specific to the windows. | 00:27:01 | |
| We did provide windows above and beyond what would be typical in a. | 00:27:05 | |
| Kroger or. | 00:27:11 | |
| Store of this size. | 00:27:12 | |
| We just could not get to that exact. | 00:27:14 | |
| Requirement, but we presented that at the BCA and we did obtain the approval of that. | 00:27:17 | |
| To the bottom there is the left elevation along Schreiber Rd. | 00:27:24 | |
| And then this shows the rear elevation of the store as well as the. | 00:27:29 | |
| Right elevation of the story, which is what would be a long highway. | 00:27:34 | |
| 150. | 00:27:38 | |
| As part of that. | 00:27:41 | |
| Project we did include a sign some sign package submittal. | 00:27:43 | |
| Which? | 00:27:47 | |
| There was a couple items we had asked for a variance for. Those were approved. | 00:27:48 | |
| But we did. | 00:27:53 | |
| We are providing monument signs at each of the intersections. | 00:27:54 | |
| And those monument signs are in compliance with code requirements. | 00:27:59 | |
| And then the last item was the development plan specific to the fuel center. | 00:28:05 | |
| That fuel center is for 9 pumps. | 00:28:11 | |
| While it is 9 individual pumps, they are double sided so they'll be a vehicle. | 00:28:14 | |
| Two vehicles at each pond. | 00:28:19 | |
| The fuel kiosk includes a. | 00:28:21 | |
| About a 200 square foot. | 00:28:24 | |
| Flock of payment window and they will have some outdoor limited outdoor merchandising. | 00:28:27 | |
| That fuel center also fully complies with the lot coverage requirements. | 00:28:34 | |
| And we did meet all of the landscape planting requirements with that plan. | 00:28:39 | |
| And as noted before, detention has been provided off site. | 00:28:43 | |
| Here is that area on the development plan. It is located there. | 00:28:48 | |
| On the screen it's to the top right. | 00:28:53 | |
| But it is located at the intersection of Hwy. 1. | 00:28:55 | |
| 50 in the new traffic signal in the new road A. | 00:28:59 | |
| Being proposed there, so it is at that intersection there. | 00:29:03 | |
| And here is a zoomed in view of that. | 00:29:08 | |
| Pointing out where the canopy with the kiosk is kind of central there. | 00:29:11 | |
| There is. | 00:29:16 | |
| A small amount of parking for employees. | 00:29:17 | |
| The tension has across the side. | 00:29:20 | |
| And Nick did clarify. | 00:29:23 | |
| He wants the restriction that there will be no direct access to proposed Rd. A. | 00:29:26 | |
| That is how we've designed the project we are providing. | 00:29:32 | |
| Secondary connections down into the Kroger parcel. | 00:29:36 | |
| And then that connects over to Rd. A. | 00:29:40 | |
| So we are in agreement with his request. | 00:29:43 | |
| And we will provide the necessary crossover agreement or access easement, whatever is determined to be appropriate. | 00:29:46 | |
| These are the elevations for the fuel Center for reference. | 00:29:56 | |
| And then this again shows the locations of the monument signs for each lot and each of those monument signs will have gold pricing | 00:30:02 | |
| as well. | 00:30:07 | |
| That is an overview of the project. | 00:30:13 | |
| There was a question about the environmental. | 00:30:17 | |
| Kroger has hired an environmental consultant. They did do that environmental study. | 00:30:24 | |
| They identified that the stream that cuts through the property is non jurisdictional. | 00:30:29 | |
| Sounds like we just need to. | 00:30:35 | |
| Ask them to submit that to the core and have them validate our findings. | 00:30:37 | |
| Don't recall in the report if it. | 00:30:42 | |
| If they've done that. | 00:30:44 | |
| But we can certainly do that as a condition, so. | 00:30:46 | |
| If that helps answer your question. | 00:30:49 | |
| With that, I'll be happy to answer any questions. Anybody have any questions? | 00:30:54 | |
| I have one that I had already asked Nick, but I'll ask it to view. So what are you doing with the other fuel station that you | 00:30:59 | |
| already have? JC already has 1, so now we're going to have. | 00:31:03 | |
| To and kind of have the market cornered up there or what I. | 00:31:06 | |
| Don't think it's necessarily the intent of Kroger to have the market cornered or deliberately have two fuel stations. | 00:31:10 | |
| This store is. | 00:31:17 | |
| Being billed on a timeline with the traffic signal installation which? | 00:31:19 | |
| Just for clarification of this board that is still. | 00:31:23 | |
| A couple years out. That won't happen until 2028. | 00:31:27 | |
| I don't think at this point Kroger has identified that they're closing the other fuel center, but that is a possibility. | 00:31:33 | |
| At this point in time, it just kind of comes down to how those traffic. | 00:31:40 | |
| Flows change. | 00:31:44 | |
| And then additionally kind of that return on that initial investment, so? | 00:31:45 | |
| As of right now, there is no plan to close it. | 00:31:50 | |
| Or keep it open. It's still kind of being evaluated. | 00:31:53 | |
| If that helps answer that question. | 00:31:56 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:31:58 | |
| I do. | 00:31:59 | |
| How many feet? | 00:32:01 | |
| Is that new? | 00:32:02 | |
| Cut off 150 to the next stoplight you know. | 00:32:04 | |
| Is it up there? | 00:32:08 | |
| 1000 feet. It's got to be over 1000 for them to approve it. | 00:32:10 | |
| It can't be any closer than 1000 feet. | 00:32:14 | |
| Yeah. So the cut is sort of. | 00:32:16 | |
| You know, within a few 100 feet of being in the mid. | 00:32:20 | |
| Between Luther Road and the old Vincennes Rd. which was kind of the controlling factor. | 00:32:24 | |
| And it did fall and I don't remember the exact distance. | 00:32:30 | |
| But it did fall. | 00:32:34 | |
| Within, well, I actually have it on my plane. | 00:32:36 | |
| It is. | 00:32:39 | |
| 1570. | 00:32:40 | |
| And I I will correct what I just said. The other direction is 2780 feet, so not exactly half certainly. | 00:32:43 | |
| Kind of trying to be at that midpoint. | 00:32:51 | |
| What are they going to do with the? | 00:32:53 | |
| Oh my God. | 00:32:55 | |
| The existing JC door. | 00:32:58 | |
| That is a leased property, so that would be up to that property owner to yeah. | 00:33:01 | |
| To say what their plans are for that. | 00:33:07 | |
| Anybody else? I have a question where you have an answer. | 00:33:10 | |
| Do you know what the elevation? | 00:33:14 | |
| Will be on the building versus the the 1:50 just approximately. | 00:33:15 | |
| I do know that, but I don't have it with me. | 00:33:22 | |
| But I think as as if you're familiar with the property. | 00:33:27 | |
| 150 would kind of be on the low side. Schreiber Rd. would be on the high side. | 00:33:31 | |
| As I recall, we're kind of put that midpoint or close to midpoint between those two allocations. | 00:33:36 | |
| I I do have questions. Go ahead. | 00:33:43 | |
| And maybe for Nick or for technical review committee? | 00:33:45 | |
| Was there any discussion or possibility? | 00:33:49 | |
| To have a connector Rd. between Highlander Point and this property. | 00:33:52 | |
| To alleviate. | 00:33:58 | |
| People going back out on 150 or you? | 00:34:01 | |
| I I see a. | 00:34:04 | |
| Increase in Schreiber. | 00:34:06 | |
| To get to the store. | 00:34:08 | |
| The current doesn't do. I don't know if you want to. The current design that we put forth does not include any connectivity. I | 00:34:11 | |
| didn't know if there was a place there for that. | 00:34:15 | |
| Now we have not included that at this point in time. | 00:34:20 | |
| OK, ****. | 00:34:27 | |
| Would be was it? | 00:34:32 | |
| We didn't. | 00:34:35 | |
| Require or ask them to add. | 00:34:36 | |
| Connection to Hwy. or to the Highlander Point Center. | 00:34:40 | |
| A previous development. | 00:34:45 | |
| For this property, the PUD had a connection to to that and the. | 00:34:47 | |
| Owner of Highlander appointed at that time did not want one. Obviously this is a different project. | 00:34:51 | |
| In a different location where? | 00:34:59 | |
| Potential connection could occur additionally. | 00:35:00 | |
| Hiring a point doesn't have any public. | 00:35:04 | |
| Grows inside of it. | 00:35:08 | |
| So we would be connecting them. | 00:35:10 | |
| Public Rd. directly to a private stand. So there's there's a few things that need to be worked out to to accommodate that. It's | 00:35:12 | |
| not out of question, but. | 00:35:16 | |
| Yeah, I'm just thinking. | 00:35:20 | |
| It might be good for both property owners. | 00:35:22 | |
| Didn't involve the government at all, but. | 00:35:25 | |
| It might be good for both. Thank you anybody else? | 00:35:28 | |
| OK at this time. | 00:35:33 | |
| Are going to open up to public comment, let me say that. | 00:35:36 | |
| When you come up you spent you state your name and address. | 00:35:39 | |
| And your comments come to the board. You're not allowed to ask the petitioner or the engineer anybody any comments, We'll get | 00:35:43 | |
| those answers for you. | 00:35:47 | |
| When you come up. So at this time, we'll open up the. | 00:35:52 | |
| The floor to Anybody have any favorable comments for the project? | 00:35:55 | |
| It looks like there's nobody there now. We'd like to have anybody in opposition. | 00:36:01 | |
| To this project, please come forward, state your name and address. | 00:36:05 | |
| Please come forward, Sir. | 00:36:09 | |
| My name is Claude Harrelson. | 00:36:17 | |
| Is that all you need? Just to name address please? 4059 Tanglewood Dr. Boyd Knobs. It's all Buck Creek. | 00:36:21 | |
| My comments would be. | 00:36:29 | |
| Going along with what he asked about the Connector Rd. | 00:36:31 | |
| I would ask that that would be a. | 00:36:34 | |
| Stipulation that they at least go with the previous owner to find out if this changes their minds since it's not a subdivision. | 00:36:36 | |
| Going in but a commercial property? | 00:36:42 | |
| Regardless if it's a public road or not. | 00:36:44 | |
| Just to cut down traffic on Hwy. 150. | 00:36:46 | |
| I know that anytime that you, you see a shopping center built when they close off that. | 00:36:51 | |
| That go between then you have people going in. | 00:36:55 | |
| Into the main traffic and then back out. | 00:36:58 | |
| Which just intensifies the chance of a. | 00:37:01 | |
| Accident. | 00:37:04 | |
| The other thing would be my question would be. | 00:37:06 | |
| If this could be billed without the filling station. | 00:37:08 | |
| That's just going to add additional traffic. | 00:37:12 | |
| And since Kroger doesn't know if they're going to keep it open, the old JC. | 00:37:15 | |
| Or close it. | 00:37:19 | |
| Then why not? | 00:37:21 | |
| Build it without it. | 00:37:22 | |
| That would eliminate a lot of in and out traffic that's not even going into the store. | 00:37:24 | |
| Which would cut down. | 00:37:29 | |
| Additional. | 00:37:31 | |
| Accidents, possibly. | 00:37:32 | |
| But. | 00:37:35 | |
| If secondly, one open and one. | 00:37:36 | |
| By not building this one, they'll leave that one open. | 00:37:39 | |
| We won't have an empty station. | 00:37:42 | |
| In 2029 or 2028 whenever they open it. | 00:37:43 | |
| And then my what was this? | 00:37:49 | |
| There was a includes a. | 00:37:52 | |
| Drugstore. | 00:37:54 | |
| WNS and a Starbucks. I didn't know what WNS? | 00:37:55 | |
| W Why I'm in spirits. | 00:37:58 | |
| Liquor store, it's going to be the package store, OK. | 00:38:00 | |
| And one last thing was. | 00:38:04 | |
| Did they address how they're building? | 00:38:05 | |
| In and outs for Schreiber Rd. Is that going to be? | 00:38:08 | |
| Is that going to be open? | 00:38:12 | |
| To where that road you, you all know that roads in terrible shape. And if it's not, if something's not done before 2028? | 00:38:14 | |
| That's definitely going to be. | 00:38:20 | |
| Bad access point. | 00:38:22 | |
| We go back and forth on that road just to avoid Hwy. 150. | 00:38:24 | |
| But if there's going to be cars going in and out of that subdivision, shopping center. | 00:38:28 | |
| I would ask that the. | 00:38:33 | |
| Council do something restricting traffic on that. | 00:38:34 | |
| It's a good idea to restrict the traffic into the shop into the gas station. | 00:38:37 | |
| From that new road, but I would also think it would help to. | 00:38:41 | |
| Limited from Schreiber Rd. as well if the county wanted to widen that road. | 00:38:44 | |
| We should have started two years ago, agree. | 00:38:49 | |
| It never happens that way, but you know. | 00:38:52 | |
| Maybe you can do something about. | 00:38:55 | |
| Limited in that road access. | 00:38:57 | |
| We talk about it a lot. | 00:38:59 | |
| That's all I have. Thank you. All right, thank you. | 00:39:02 | |
| OK. Anybody else like to come forward? | 00:39:05 | |
| Completely up state your name and address. Thank you very much. | 00:39:08 | |
| Rick Ellis be I live at 7407 Jersey Park Rd. Floyd Knox. | 00:39:14 | |
| I just like to. | 00:39:18 | |
| Build back on what Frank said about the conjoining 2 properties, possibly Highlander Point and the. | 00:39:20 | |
| JC Center I think have a lot of benefits traffic pattern wise. | 00:39:25 | |
| Just community wise to people not have to go back out on the Interstate or. | 00:39:29 | |
| Go back on Tracker Road and she eliminates some of the traffic off Shriver Rd. | 00:39:33 | |
| I don't know how Krogers do their truck pattern for the delivery, so they'll be coming up one bit to your. | 00:39:38 | |
| Traver, but with the design, it's probably going to be a little bit congested too, because there's. | 00:39:44 | |
| Is very normal. I don't have a trucks a day they do probably. | 00:39:48 | |
| 20 to 50 trucks a day coming there every day. | 00:39:51 | |
| Oh everything to use the proposed Rd. A being a private road, I wasn't. | 00:39:55 | |
| Or excuse me, a public Rd. I wasn't aware of that. | 00:40:00 | |
| How's that being funded and who's going to maintain that road is that? | 00:40:03 | |
| You want to be a public girl float tenant anymore? | 00:40:07 | |
| Floyd County got repaid. Floyd County is snow removal that the road going from 1:50 to shrubbery proposed. | 00:40:09 | |
| Once they build it. | 00:40:16 | |
| Being dedicated to the county. | 00:40:17 | |
| They'll turn it over. | 00:40:21 | |
| OK, but they will pay. | 00:40:22 | |
| For the initial. | 00:40:24 | |
| They're going to have to. We don't have the money. | 00:40:25 | |
| I don't think we will. | 00:40:29 | |
| Tax dollars participate. No crowded. | 00:40:31 | |
| And that develop, you know, we're going to be limited as government to tell 2 private. | 00:40:33 | |
| People, what to do? | 00:40:38 | |
| But if you guys could get together and figure out a way it had a little conversation with Marley and bring it to Nick then. | 00:40:39 | |
| It would probably be good for you and good for that, obvious good for everybody, community especially, but I just don't know where | 00:40:46 | |
| you would put it. Support that. I've got some ideas where you can put it. | 00:40:50 | |
| You guys work that out? | 00:40:55 | |
| We'd be interested to listen to it, OK. | 00:40:56 | |
| Appreciate it. Thanks. Thank you, Sir. | 00:40:59 | |
| OK. Anybody else? | 00:41:02 | |
| All right at this time. | 00:41:06 | |
| Mr. John, if you'd like to come back and you got 5 minutes to talk about any of the issues that were brought up. | 00:41:08 | |
| Thank you. I'll just clarify a couple items. I did confirm that as part of that environmental assessment that Kroger did. | 00:41:15 | |
| That was submitted to the Court of Engineers and they did accept that that it is a non jurisdictional waterway. So. | 00:41:24 | |
| If we haven't provided that to Nick, we will certainly do that and make it part of the record. | 00:41:32 | |
| As to the shared connectivity to the new proposed Rd. A. | 00:41:37 | |
| We're committed to continuing that discussion with that property owner, but. | 00:41:43 | |
| At this time. | 00:41:46 | |
| Absolutely agreed to connection. | 00:41:48 | |
| And then the other gentleman, I think is. | 00:41:52 | |
| Questions and comments were a little more. | 00:41:55 | |
| Big picture, high level, not plan specific so I don't have anything. | 00:41:57 | |
| Add to that. | 00:42:02 | |
| With that, I'll be happy to answer any new questions that. | 00:42:03 | |
| You may have. | 00:42:06 | |
| All right. Any questions? | 00:42:08 | |
| Mr. Campbell. | 00:42:10 | |
| You might not build that. | 00:42:12 | |
| Fuel new fuel station right away, correct? | 00:42:13 | |
| Will be built if. | 00:42:16 | |
| If it's decided not to be built, that would be considered an outline of the. The intent is that it will be an outline of the | 00:42:18 | |
| Kroger Center. | 00:42:22 | |
| We're here today to ask for permission to build that if for some reason that is not built. | 00:42:27 | |
| When the store opens. | 00:42:33 | |
| It could be built later or they may make a decision to sell off that property. | 00:42:36 | |
| If that was to happen, that plan would have to come back before you for approval at that time. | 00:42:41 | |
| That's correct. | 00:42:47 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:42:49 | |
| Yeah, go ahead, Sir. | 00:42:51 | |
| So what is what is before this board is a zoning map amendment and a subdivision. | 00:42:52 | |
| Control approval. | 00:42:57 | |
| The conditional use for a fuel center on that lot was approved earlier tonight by the BZA. | 00:43:00 | |
| So if the if it is rezone. | 00:43:06 | |
| They can build it if they like. | 00:43:08 | |
| Have the conditional use or they could decide to go a different way with their. | 00:43:10 | |
| They're they're probably all right. Thank you, Nick. | 00:43:14 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Campbell. | 00:43:17 | |
| All righty. OK, that ends the public. | 00:43:19 | |
| Comment portion at this time. | 00:43:23 | |
| I'm looking for somebody to present a ballot for our. | 00:43:25 | |
| I have a ballot. OK, Mr. Mr. It's got a ballot. Go ahead. And this is for FC 122542. | 00:43:33 | |
| Yeah, 42. OK. All right, go ahead. | 00:43:42 | |
| For Docket FC122542, JC Food Stores. | 00:43:47 | |
| Under the Floyd County zoning ordinance. | 00:43:53 | |
| 2006. | 00:43:56 | |
| Reviewing the zoning amendment petition, the Planning Commission, the county commissioner shall. | 00:43:58 | |
| Pay reasonable regard to the following. | 00:44:03 | |
| The Floyd County comprehensive plan in any applicable. | 00:44:06 | |
| Adopted planning studies of reports. | 00:44:10 | |
| Current conditions in the character. | 00:44:12 | |
| Current structures and uses of each district. | 00:44:15 | |
| The most desirable use. | 00:44:18 | |
| Of which the land for each district is adapted. | 00:44:19 | |
| The conservation of property values throughout Floyd County and responsible growth and development. | 00:44:23 | |
| After careful reviews, Floyd County Planning Commission finds that. | 00:44:29 | |
| One, the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:44:34 | |
| Because Floyd County follows smart growth principles for development with the following paramount. | 00:44:40 | |
| Principles We want to preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental. | 00:44:46 | |
| Areas, yeah. | 00:44:52 | |
| We want to strengthen and direct development toward existing communities. | 00:44:54 | |
| We want to foster distinctive, attractive communities with strong sense of place. | 00:44:58 | |
| #10. | 00:45:04 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is. | 00:45:05 | |
| Consistent with current conditions in the character of current structures and uses in the area. | 00:45:08 | |
| Because the property it's adjacent to the Highlander Point shopping center. | 00:45:14 | |
| And there are large commercial strip, which is a large commercial strip. | 00:45:19 | |
| Area, uh. | 00:45:23 | |
| And it's on both sides of 1. | 00:45:24 | |
| The. | 00:45:28 | |
| Of this subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of land. | 00:45:30 | |
| Because the property is in the economic growth area defined in Floyd County's comprehensive plan. | 00:45:35 | |
| Is also ideally located on US150 near I-64. | 00:45:41 | |
| The property is well suited for continuation of the shopping district. | 00:45:46 | |
| And ancillary services in a fuel station. | 00:45:50 | |
| #4 the rezoning of the subject. | 00:45:55 | |
| Property will not. | 00:45:57 | |
| Being juries to the value of the other properties in the area. | 00:45:59 | |
| Because the rezoning. | 00:46:02 | |
| Is not injurious to. | 00:46:07 | |
| Nearby properties or the proposal is consistent with long-term historic planning of the 150 corridor. | 00:46:09 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support. | 00:46:16 | |
| Responsible growth and development in the area because. | 00:46:20 | |
| Proposed rezoning follows the county smart growth principles and are consistent with nearby land use. | 00:46:23 | |
| Adequate infrastructure is available. | 00:46:30 | |
| Nearby and can be brought to the project. | 00:46:33 | |
| Upon careful reviews, Floyd County Planning Commission hereby makes a favorable. | 00:46:36 | |
| Recommendation to. | 00:46:41 | |
| On the petitioners zoning amendment application. | 00:46:45 | |
| This day, the 12th of January 20. | 00:46:48 | |
| 26. | 00:46:51 | |
| The favorable recommendation is made based on the following written commitments. | 00:46:52 | |
| Property owners shall commit to working with the county on a limited access right away break permit. | 00:46:57 | |
| Property shall pay any required. | 00:47:04 | |
| Fee for the increased property value for those properties. | 00:47:08 | |
| Charged by N, dot or other state agencies. | 00:47:12 | |
| That's my valley. | 00:47:15 | |
| All right, we have about any discussion. | 00:47:17 | |
| Second question. | 00:47:19 | |
| I need a second. | 00:47:21 | |
| You second, I'll second, area second. Any discussion? | 00:47:23 | |
| That being none, all OK, go ahead Mr. | 00:47:28 | |
| As I commented earlier, I would. | 00:47:33 | |
| Suggest adding as approved by the county for the written commitment, just so that we're not. | 00:47:36 | |
| Staff. | 00:47:43 | |
| Staff or by county because this is. | 00:47:44 | |
| Commissioner issue that's yet to be negotiated, so I just want. | 00:47:47 | |
| To leave that a little wider open. | 00:47:52 | |
| He sang on the written commitment at the end as A to add as approved by the county. | 00:47:56 | |
| Because that will ultimately then. | 00:48:01 | |
| OK, we have we have an amendment to the ballot. You want to read the amendment, please. | 00:48:25 | |
| My amendment is on the favorable recommendation is based on the following written commitments. | 00:48:29 | |
| Number one, the property owner shall commit to working with the county on the limited access. | 00:48:36 | |
| Right away break permit. | 00:48:40 | |
| Property shell. | 00:48:42 | |
| Pay any required. | 00:48:43 | |
| Fee for the increased property value for those properties charged by N, dot and other state agencies as approved by the county. | 00:48:45 | |
| That's sufficient. | 00:48:54 | |
| All righty. We've got an amended. I need a second on the amendment. We have a second. Any further discussion? | 00:48:56 | |
| That being none, all in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:49:03 | |
| All right, it passes. | 00:49:09 | |
| Thank you. | 00:49:10 | |
| All right, now we're looking for a ballot. | 00:49:11 | |
| 44343 Larry has a ballot. | 00:49:14 | |
| No. | 00:49:23 | |
| Ballot for primary approval a major subdivision. | 00:49:24 | |
| Docket FC12-205-43. | 00:49:28 | |
| Applicant JC Food Stores. | 00:49:31 | |
| Petitioner has met all the following requirements. A. | 00:49:34 | |
| Preliminary plan provided BE certification demonstrates compliance with that DEM. | 00:49:38 | |
| Rule 5. See the plat. | 00:49:43 | |
| Identifying all pertinent information pursuant to SCO and Deployed County. | 00:49:47 | |
| Plan planning and zoning. | 00:49:52 | |
| Commissioner, Rules of Procedures. | 00:49:54 | |
| DG of Technical read. | 00:49:56 | |
| Report provided. | 00:49:58 | |
| A solar report was completed under FC O 3/22/17. | 00:49:59 | |
| E Traffic impact study was provided. | 00:50:05 | |
| If phase one Environmental Audit report provided. | 00:50:08 | |
| It's not required because we had one from a preliminary site report completed and submitted under FC3-202-17. | 00:50:13 | |
| A new one one required. | 00:50:22 | |
| Gee site plan provided. | 00:50:24 | |
| That shows topographic wetlands. | 00:50:25 | |
| Flood hazard areas. Steep slopes. | 00:50:28 | |
| And soil shown in. | 00:50:31 | |
| Soil survey for Floyd County is having severe limitations on Urban Development. | 00:50:32 | |
| H Lots, all lights go. | 00:50:39 | |
| With the Floyd counties opening audits requirement for general commercial. | 00:50:40 | |
| Streets. The new streets. | 00:50:44 | |
| Is compliant with county standards. | 00:50:46 | |
| #2. | 00:50:51 | |
| The new street serving the development meets the surface type and the right of way requirements #3 the new street. | 00:50:53 | |
| Has not been named #4 there are not. | 00:50:59 | |
| Any pertinent debt? | 00:51:02 | |
| Permanent dead end streets however a private easement is needed for the private drive to. | 00:51:03 | |
| Access Lot C. | 00:51:08 | |
| #5. | 00:51:10 | |
| In MDOT approval is pending. | 00:51:11 | |
| For the limited access break. | 00:51:14 | |
| Number six curbs and gutters conformity I dot standard specification. | 00:51:16 | |
| J Driveways, intersections, and entrances. | 00:51:21 | |
| 2 subdivision entrances. | 00:51:24 | |
| Where 50 or more lights proposed. | 00:51:27 | |
| #2 Driveway separation meets the requirements of the SEO. | 00:51:32 | |
| #3 All driveways and intersections are located in accordance with the. | 00:51:36 | |
| OK, sidewalks are provided. | 00:51:41 | |
| Throughout the development on either side of the public Rd. | 00:51:43 | |
| L Protective covenants are required but have not been provided for maintenance and repair. | 00:51:48 | |
| Of sidewalks and regional detention and private easements use and maintenance. | 00:51:53 | |
| #2 Petitioner has met the final requirements for drainage and stormwater. | 00:51:57 | |
| At DNR, approval is required for alterations up to the natural drainage pasture. | 00:52:04 | |
| Pattern and natural stream patterns caused by construction. The petitioner will. | 00:52:08 | |
| Also need to provide documentation of the declassification of the Blue Line stream. | 00:52:13 | |
| From Adam and DNR. | 00:52:18 | |
| Be full drainage plans. | 00:52:20 | |
| Compliant with the county stormwater regulations will be required prior to secondary approval. | 00:52:22 | |
| Development we utilize like B for detention basin. | 00:52:27 | |
| See Primary Drainage plan. | 00:52:30 | |
| Was provide a preliminary drainage plan was provided. | 00:52:32 | |
| 3 Petitioner has provided. | 00:52:35 | |
| A letter. | 00:52:38 | |
| Provided letters confirming availability and willingness to serve. | 00:52:39 | |
| For all necessary utilities, water, sewage, fire. | 00:52:43 | |
| Gas and electric. | 00:52:46 | |
| #4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer. | 00:52:48 | |
| And. | 00:52:51 | |
| True service. | 00:52:52 | |
| They service for the subdivision lights will be. | 00:52:54 | |
| Extended to an IDE. Improved municipal. | 00:52:58 | |
| Our county owned or. | 00:53:02 | |
| Or operate sanitary sewer system. | 00:53:04 | |
| Decision Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants. | 00:53:08 | |
| The petitioner. Primary approval. | 00:53:12 | |
| Primary approval. | 00:53:16 | |
| For a major subdivision at the meeting held on the 12th day of January 2026. | 00:53:18 | |
| Primary approval. | 00:53:22 | |
| It's based on collision the following conditions. | 00:53:24 | |
| Number one, complete drainage plan. | 00:53:27 | |
| #2 for bad documentation that the Blue Line stream has been declassified. | 00:53:29 | |
| From our dem #3 update plan to include an access easement for Lot C. | 00:53:34 | |
| #4 Provide. | 00:53:40 | |
| Protective covenants to include sidewalk maintenance, liability provisions, Private access easement. | 00:53:41 | |
| Use and Maintenance and Regional detention Use and maintenance #5 Provide an easement to buffer the Creek in this northwest corner | 00:53:47 | |
| of the property compliant with the. | 00:53:51 | |
| With the design manual number six, provide documentation. | 00:53:56 | |
| Of cooperation with Highlander fire for placement of hadrons #7 provide. | 00:54:00 | |
| Named for the new street. | 00:54:05 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 00:54:09 | |
| Just for just for clarification, when you're reading off the conditions for secondary approval, correct? | 00:54:11 | |
| Yes, OK. | 00:54:17 | |
| I thought I heard primary. It does say that. That's just what I read. It should be secondary. | 00:54:18 | |
| He said I didn't, but not DNR for the. | 00:54:24 | |
| The stream doesn't need to have both listed. | 00:54:26 | |
| I have both listed, I just didn't read 1 of them. | 00:54:29 | |
| Sorry. | 00:54:33 | |
| No, OK. | 00:54:35 | |
| OK, thank you. I need a second and I need a discussion. | 00:54:37 | |
| Anymore discussion? | 00:54:42 | |
| If none. | 00:54:44 | |
| All in favor. Think about that. | 00:54:45 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. It passes, Thank you very much. | 00:54:48 | |
| All right, you've got 2. | 00:54:53 | |
| And then grab that one there. | 00:55:00 | |
| What? | 00:55:01 | |
| This one right away. | 00:55:10 | |
| No, we're fine. I just don't want to get mixed up so I. | 00:55:12 | |
| OK, at this time we need a ballot for. | 00:55:18 | |
| 44. | 00:55:21 | |
| I have a ballot, all right. French got a ballot. | 00:55:26 | |
| Thank you, Frank. | 00:55:29 | |
| All right. Thanks. | 00:55:36 | |
| You said 44, correct? Yes, Sir. | 00:55:50 | |
| Jacques Store 091, docket number. | 00:55:57 | |
| FC 122544. | 00:56:01 | |
| Conceptual site plan review by Planning Director with YES on 12/16/25. | 00:56:05 | |
| I wasn't sure if that was correct date was that. | 00:56:11 | |
| The initial time was 10/3. | 00:56:19 | |
| So I should change that date. | 00:56:22 | |
| Yeah, I I wasn't sure in that 10/3. | 00:56:24 | |
| Findings that the petitioner has not met all the development standards for the district. | 00:56:34 | |
| Petitioner has requested variances from the development standards from the BTA for. | 00:56:40 | |
| The facade, building material, signage, internal sidewalk, pedestrian connection, and external sidewalk. | 00:56:46 | |
| A waiver of the development standards requirement is required. If required, a waiver of the development standard is granted. | 00:56:54 | |
| Because the waiver supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring high quality design. | 00:57:02 | |
| A waiver is consistent with the Spirit intent. | 00:57:10 | |
| Of the comprehensive plan because the waiver supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring high quality | 00:57:13 | |
| design. | 00:57:17 | |
| Be a waiver is consistent with the intent of the district. | 00:57:21 | |
| Because the requested variances are not eliminating the required design elements, but modifying them. | 00:57:25 | |
| To the property characteristics. | 00:57:33 | |
| And the scale of our development. | 00:57:35 | |
| The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan because the development is a commercial project. | 00:57:38 | |
| Located upon Highlander Point District and Economic Growth Area, sufficient infrastructure exists to support the. | 00:57:45 | |
| Project The proposed development plan is consistent with the intent of the district and set forth in Floyd County. | 00:57:52 | |
| Zoning ordinance because the development meets the standards for the district with minor variances. | 00:58:01 | |
| And are appropriate for the location and scale of the project. | 00:58:07 | |
| The proposed development plan does satisfy. | 00:58:11 | |
| The following development requirements. | 00:58:15 | |
| A signage is designed to create a unified and consistent sign package. Yes. | 00:58:18 | |
| Design and location of the street access points minimize congestion. Yes. | 00:58:23 | |
| Entrance entrances, streets, internal traffic facilities. | 00:58:29 | |
| Are compatible with existing planned streets and adjacent development, yes. | 00:58:34 | |
| Design and layout of the development has a clear circulation pattern that is sensitive to the topography and other natural | 00:58:40 | |
| features. Yes. | 00:58:44 | |
| Design of the proposed development plan provides adequate pedestrian connections within the development and safe St. crossings. | 00:58:48 | |
| To adjacent. | 00:58:56 | |
| Land uses, yes. | 00:58:57 | |
| As much as possible. | 00:58:59 | |
| Lighting is designed to create. | 00:59:02 | |
| A unified and consistent lighting package for the development. Yes. Lighting and parking areas did not exceed 20 feet in height, | 00:59:04 | |
| Yes. | 00:59:08 | |
| The proposed development is not in a residential urban. | 00:59:13 | |
| The proposed development is not a multi family development. | 00:59:17 | |
| If the proposed development is located in a residential urban district. | 00:59:21 | |
| Multifamily development is proposed. | 00:59:25 | |
| The development does satisfy the requirements of the recreational space and open space. | 00:59:28 | |
| An open space. | 00:59:33 | |
| The proposed development is located in the Highlander Point district of The Edge. | 00:59:35 | |
| Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:59:39 | |
| If the proposed development is located in Highlander Point Gateway District in the Edwardsville. | 00:59:42 | |
| Gateway District. | 00:59:48 | |
| The following requirements have been met. | 00:59:49 | |
| Building facades that face any adjacent St. have a finished. | 00:59:53 | |
| Facade. | 00:59:59 | |
| Loading docks and trash collection bins are not placed. | 01:00:00 | |
| On or along the. | 01:00:04 | |
| The facade that face any adjacent St. Yes. | 01:00:06 | |
| Accommodation for the community space where? | 01:00:11 | |
| Proposed commercial development has over 100,000 square foot. | 01:00:14 | |
| Either. | 01:00:18 | |
| Combination of buildings or. | 01:00:19 | |
| Lots in a cohesive commercial development. | 01:00:22 | |
| Project. | 01:00:26 | |
| It does not apply. | 01:00:27 | |
| Open space requirement on section 904. | 01:00:29 | |
| How many ordinance are not did not apply? | 01:00:34 | |
| THE DECISION. Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby approves the petitioners. | 01:00:38 | |
| Development plan application. | 01:00:44 | |
| At the meeting held on the 12th day of January 2026. | 01:00:46 | |
| OK. | 01:00:53 | |
| We need a second for that. | 01:00:55 | |
| I will second. | 01:00:57 | |
| All right then we need helping for any discussion please. | 01:00:58 | |
| Do we need to add in the approval contingent upon even though this was, we already know that they have it or? | 01:01:01 | |
| Just making sure that we. | 01:01:10 | |
| All right. Thank you for all right that point. No other comments all in favor signify by. | 01:01:13 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:01:19 | |
| It passes. Thank you. | 01:01:21 | |
| All right, while we get that ready, somebody needs to be thinking who's going to do #4-45? | 01:01:24 | |
| I need a ballot. I can do 45. | 01:01:32 | |
| All right, we do have a ballot. | 01:01:34 | |
| Nope. | 01:01:38 | |
| Scribbled on the wrong way. | 01:01:44 | |
| All right, Docket FC1225-45. | 01:01:48 | |
| Petitioner JC Food Stores. | 01:01:51 | |
| Conceptual pipe. | 01:01:54 | |
| Site plan review by planning director, Yes. | 01:01:55 | |
| Finding one petitioner has not met all the developmental standards for the district #2 waiver. | 01:01:59 | |
| Of the development standards requirements is required. | 01:02:06 | |
| It required a waiver of development standards is granted because a a waiver is consistent with the spirit and intent of the | 01:02:09 | |
| Comprehensive plan because the waiver supports the development. | 01:02:14 | |
| Of the commercial growth area while ensuring high quality design. | 01:02:20 | |
| A waiver is consistent with the 10 of the district because the variance. | 01:02:24 | |
| Requested or not eliminating. | 01:02:28 | |
| The required design elements, but modifying them to a unique circumstances of the property and the scale of the development. | 01:02:30 | |
| #3 The proposed development is consistent with a comprehensive plan. | 01:02:37 | |
| Because the overall development is a large commercial project located in the Highlander Point Overlay District and Economic Growth | 01:02:41 | |
| area. | 01:02:45 | |
| And there is sufficient infrastructure to support the development. | 01:02:48 | |
| #4 The pros development is consistent with the intent of the district. | 01:02:53 | |
| As set forth in Florida County Zoning yardage because it developed substantially meets the standards of the district. | 01:02:57 | |
| Where they're minor variance. | 01:03:02 | |
| Appropriate for the location of the proposal. | 01:03:04 | |
| The use is an allowed condition use in the district. | 01:03:08 | |
| #5 The proposed development does. | 01:03:11 | |
| Satisfy the following. | 01:03:14 | |
| Development Requirements A signage is designed to create a unified and consistent sign package. | 01:03:16 | |
| Be design and location of streets access points. | 01:03:21 | |
| Enter mass congestion. See entrances, streets and internal traffic facilities. | 01:03:24 | |
| Are compatible with existing. | 01:03:30 | |
| Plant streets and adjacent developments D Design and. | 01:03:32 | |
| And layout of the developments as a clears. | 01:03:35 | |
| Circulation pattern that is sensitive to total. | 01:03:37 | |
| Topography. | 01:03:40 | |
| And other natural features design of. | 01:03:41 | |
| Proposed development plan provides adequate. | 01:03:44 | |
| Pedestrian Connect. | 01:03:46 | |
| Connections within the development of safe St. crossings to adjacent land uses. | 01:03:48 | |
| F Lighting is designed to create a unified and consistent light package for the development. | 01:03:52 | |
| G lighting is. | 01:03:57 | |
| And parking areas. | 01:03:58 | |
| Do not exceed 20 feet in height. | 01:03:59 | |
| Number six, the program is not in a residential. | 01:04:02 | |
| Residents are the proposed development is not in the multifamily. | 01:04:06 | |
| Development #7 the proposed. | 01:04:11 | |
| Government is located in the Highlander Point District. | 01:04:14 | |
| And the following requirements have been met. | 01:04:17 | |
| A building facade that faced any adjacent streets have finished facades be. | 01:04:19 | |
| Loading docks and trash collecting vans are not placed. | 01:04:24 | |
| On or along the facades that face the adjacent streets. | 01:04:27 | |
| Decision upon careful review, the Floyd County Commission. | 01:04:34 | |
| Hereby approves the petitioners. | 01:04:37 | |
| Development plan. | 01:04:40 | |
| Application at the meeting held on the 12th of January 2026 that completes my ballot. | 01:04:41 | |
| OK, we have a ballot. I need a second. | 01:04:47 | |
| We have a second any discussion? | 01:04:49 | |
| Seeing none all in favor signify by aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:04:53 | |
| Thank you. | 01:04:59 | |
| All right. That was the last agenda. Do you have some discussion, Nick? | 01:05:00 | |
| I do just want to provide 1 update the technical review committee. | 01:05:07 | |
| Met on December the 18th to review. | 01:05:11 | |
| A proposed development at 200 Tuscany. | 01:05:15 | |
| It is a by right developing a commercial district for a medical. | 01:05:19 | |
| Offices. | 01:05:24 | |
| Total of 15,000 square foot across two stories in that W 12th group. | 01:05:26 | |
| All right, and that. | 01:05:33 | |
| Yet no other further about business. | 01:05:35 | |
| OK, before we close, I just would like to. | 01:05:38 | |
| Thank Frank and thank Larry for presenting the ballots tonight. It definitely helps when people share that because you're you lose | 01:05:41 | |
| your voice eventually. So thank both of you guys for doing that for us. | 01:05:47 | |
| Appreciate that. | 01:05:53 | |
| All right. Before you leave, I want to be sure everybody has signed. | 01:05:55 | |
| The proper. | 01:05:58 | |
| Let me make sure I sign it. | 01:06:00 | |
| And I want to be sure that Christy says that we can go. | 01:06:02 | |
| Before we adjourn. | 01:06:05 | |
| Do not want to get in trouble. | 01:06:07 | |
| Oh, we're missing somebody. | 01:06:26 | |
| It's the last bowel we just had. Yep, OK. | 01:06:28 | |
| OK, I need a motion to adjourn. | 01:06:38 | |
| So moved OK. | 01:06:41 | |
| We got a second see you guys all in favor segment if I buy. | 01:06:43 | |
| All right. See you guys. Thanks. | 01:06:46 | |
| All righty. | 01:06:49 |
Transcript
| Call to order the Floyd County Planning Commission. | 00:00:00 | |
| At this time, we like to stand and do the pledge allegiance, please. | 00:00:03 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag. | 00:00:07 | |
| For the United States of America. | 00:00:10 | |
| And to the Republic for which it stands. | 00:00:12 | |
| One nation under God. | 00:00:14 | |
| Indivisible. | 00:00:16 | |
| With liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:17 | |
| All righty. | 00:00:20 | |
| Thank you very much. At this time we have roll call. | 00:00:22 | |
| Here. | 00:00:29 | |
| Here. | 00:00:31 | |
| Here. | 00:00:33 | |
| Here here. | 00:00:38 | |
| Connie Moon here. | 00:00:40 | |
| Here. | 00:00:44 | |
| That's it. OK. | 00:00:46 | |
| And I just like to welcome. We've got 2 new members on the board. | 00:00:48 | |
| Connie Moon, welcome. And Dale Backshall, thank you guys. Appreciate you coming on board with us. | 00:00:51 | |
| Thanks a bunch. | 00:00:57 | |
| OK at this time. | 00:00:58 | |
| I'm going to turn the. | 00:01:00 | |
| Table over to Christie for the election of officers. | 00:01:03 | |
| OK. So for the election of officers, you'll be dealing with voting on a President and Vice President this evening. So the first | 00:01:06 | |
| order of business will be a motion for president. | 00:01:10 | |
| I'll make a motion for President Victor Andrew. | 00:01:15 | |
| OK, there's a motion for Victoria Unruh to serve as president of the Planning Commission. Is there a second? | 00:01:18 | |
| I'll second. | 00:01:22 | |
| OK. Second all in favor. | 00:01:23 | |
| Aye, any opposed? | 00:01:25 | |
| OK. I'll turn it back over to Mr. Unruh. | 00:01:27 | |
| You can't oppose. I'm sorry. There you go. | 00:01:30 | |
| OK, this increase in your paycheck. Yeah, for sure. | 00:01:32 | |
| All right, this time I'd like to see if there anybody on the board would like to volunteer. | 00:01:36 | |
| To be the vice. | 00:01:41 | |
| Chair, Vice President, in the event of my absence, and I will tell you I will not be here. | 00:01:43 | |
| Next month so I'll be in upfront. Candid SO but I need a volunteer. | 00:01:48 | |
| I fall in tear if nobody else will. | 00:01:56 | |
| OK, Dominic, Connie. All right. There you go. We got a nomination. I need a second. | 00:01:59 | |
| I'll second that you got a second all in favor signify by. | 00:02:04 | |
| Aye, anybody opposed likewise. Thank you. All right now we got. | 00:02:07 | |
| Go ahead. | 00:02:11 | |
| OK. | 00:02:15 | |
| Now we have to. | 00:02:16 | |
| Two people. | 00:02:19 | |
| To the BCA. | 00:02:20 | |
| At this time, Larry is serving. | 00:02:21 | |
| As a member from the Plant Commission. | 00:02:24 | |
| And I'm serving on the BC as a Planning Commission. | 00:02:26 | |
| From the Commission. | 00:02:29 | |
| I'm willing to continue, and Larry is too, but if somebody else is? | 00:02:31 | |
| Just destined to want to do that. | 00:02:34 | |
| Let me know and I will give up my spot and Larry probably would too, but. | 00:02:37 | |
| OK time. It doesn't work for me so doing a great job. Then we need a motion. | 00:02:42 | |
| I'll make a motion that. | 00:02:47 | |
| Victor Unruh and. | 00:02:48 | |
| Larry People, Hauser represent us in the BCA. | 00:02:49 | |
| I got a second too fast. Oh gosh. | 00:02:52 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 00:02:56 | |
| Aye, opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:02:59 | |
| All right now. | 00:03:01 | |
| We need 5 members. | 00:03:03 | |
| From. | 00:03:05 | |
| The the Plan Commission. | 00:03:07 | |
| To serve on the plat committee. | 00:03:10 | |
| And one alternate is what Nick told me. Is that correct? | 00:03:12 | |
| OK, so. | 00:03:15 | |
| Right now. | 00:03:16 | |
| I know Larry myself. | 00:03:18 | |
| Chris, Gina. | 00:03:22 | |
| And Mr. Mr. Frank Worth Saunders, that correct? | 00:03:25 | |
| So that's 123. | 00:03:28 | |
| OK, OK, it's 5 so so that's five. I need an alternate. | 00:03:32 | |
| You need alternate. | 00:03:37 | |
| An alternate, I don't think's ever been utilized, but it needs to be appointed. Just I'll be I'll be the alternate. OK, that's all | 00:03:40 | |
| too good. | 00:03:43 | |
| OK, we have. | 00:03:49 | |
| Gina, Mr. Brankworth, Mr. Welch. | 00:03:50 | |
| Mr. Bieber has a Mr. Andrew are the five with Frank Loop being the alternate. I need a motion so move as presented. | 00:03:53 | |
| All right, all in favor, I need a second, second. | 00:04:00 | |
| Any discussion on favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise OK, Thanks guys. | 00:04:03 | |
| All right, this time. | 00:04:09 | |
| I'd like to turn it over to Christy. She's just got some organizational and and the procedural things she wants to go over for the | 00:04:11 | |
| public. | 00:04:15 | |
| About the minutes. Oh well. | 00:04:19 | |
| I guess we could do the minutes. | 00:04:21 | |
| Let's get the minutes out of the way. I need a motion for the minutes on December 8th. | 00:04:23 | |
| Is there any discussion beforehand? | 00:04:28 | |
| I'll make a motion that we accept the minutes from December 8th. OK, we have a motion a second. | 00:04:30 | |
| I'll second we have a second all in favor signaled by the aye. Those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:04:36 | |
| Yeah, he abstained and Connie will abstain. Obviously they weren't at the meeting. | 00:04:42 | |
| You got that? | 00:04:46 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. Now we'll turn over Christy for a procedure. | 00:04:47 | |
| Perfect. Thank you. So just to kind of go over the process of the Planning Commission before we start calling agenda items. | 00:04:51 | |
| And for some of you in the audience that were at the BCA meeting, you already heard this, so I apologize, but going over this so | 00:04:57 | |
| that everybody understands how we handle the business before the Planning Commission. So the first thing that will occur is the | 00:05:02 | |
| president of the Board, Mr. Unruh, will read the agenda item that will be covering. | 00:05:07 | |
| Thereafter, the staff will present a staff report and compliance with any items that needed to be complied with. | 00:05:13 | |
| Thereafter, the applicant or the petitioner will have 10 minutes to present their application and their request to the Planning | 00:05:19 | |
| Commission Board. | 00:05:23 | |
| From there, board members may ask the petitioner and applicant questions if they wish to at that point in time. | 00:05:27 | |
| After that, public comments will be opened where those in favor and those in opposition will have an opportunity to speak. We go | 00:05:33 | |
| those in favor first. | 00:05:37 | |
| So everybody in the room that's in favor and wants to speak, we'll have 10 minutes. That's 10 minutes in total, not 10 minutes. | 00:05:41 | |
| Per person. | 00:05:47 | |
| And those in opposition will then speak next when called for, and that will also be a 10 minute section for all those in | 00:05:49 | |
| opposition to the application. | 00:05:53 | |
| The board can't expand those time periods, if appropriate, and that would be discussed at that point in time. | 00:05:58 | |
| After that, the petitioner will have 5 minutes to come back up for rebuttal of any comments that were made or to answer any | 00:06:04 | |
| questions that were made. | 00:06:07 | |
| By the. | 00:06:11 | |
| People in favor or in opposition. Thereafter, the board will have an opportunity to discuss the case. | 00:06:12 | |
| In a motion and ballot will be presented by one of the board members for consideration and voting by the board. | 00:06:17 | |
| All right. Thank you, Christy. At this time, what I'd like to just we have agenda item 1. | 00:06:23 | |
| And it was tabled. | 00:06:28 | |
| Has been pulled. | 00:06:29 | |
| And what I'd like to do is I'd like for the. | 00:06:31 | |
| The representative for the petitioner to come forward. | 00:06:33 | |
| To see if we can put all these together, if you approve of that. Is that correct? | 00:06:36 | |
| On 2 through 5, yes. | 00:06:40 | |
| Going back to the table, Adam, I'd just like to state that we are tabling that to the next regularly scheduled meeting. | 00:06:43 | |
| At their request. At their request, next we need a motion on the. | 00:06:48 | |
| We we can do one for you all to have a motion to approve the applicants request to table that to the next meeting which is | 00:06:53 | |
| February. | 00:06:57 | |
| Bear with me one second. February 9th. | 00:07:03 | |
| OK, I need a motion. | 00:07:07 | |
| I move the table as per request. | 00:07:10 | |
| 2nd. | 00:07:12 | |
| 2nd I have a second. | 00:07:13 | |
| Any conversation. | 00:07:15 | |
| All in favor signify by those opposed likewise Thank you. | 00:07:16 | |
| All right at this time. | 00:07:21 | |
| If the petitioner. | 00:07:24 | |
| Representative would come forward. | 00:07:26 | |
| State your name and your address. I got a question for you so if you will. | 00:07:28 | |
| Good afternoon. I'm John. | 00:07:36 | |
| Yeah, sorry. Good afternoon. I'm John Campbell with Heritage Engineering. | 00:07:37 | |
| Here representing. | 00:07:42 | |
| JC Food Stores on behalf of the Kroger Company. | 00:07:44 | |
| The address is. | 00:07:49 | |
| And I should know this, I've been here for. | 00:07:51 | |
| 12 years now 603 N Shore Dr. Ste. 204, Jeffersonville, IN. | 00:07:54 | |
| 40471. | 00:08:00 | |
| 3030 OK, So the question I have for you. | 00:08:03 | |
| Is do you have a problem with this? | 00:08:09 | |
| Putting item Agenda item 234. | 00:08:11 | |
| And five altogether. | 00:08:14 | |
| And we'll present them as one, but we will vote on them. | 00:08:16 | |
| Individually, do you have a problem with that? | 00:08:20 | |
| I do not, I did prepare the presentation with stop points, but I'm I can make the presentation in order and then vote at the end | 00:08:22 | |
| or answer questions. Thank you very much. | 00:08:27 | |
| At this time, I asked Nick to come forward with the staff reports, please. | 00:08:33 | |
| OK so we will do FC 12254243. | 00:08:41 | |
| 45. | 00:08:50 | |
| 44 and 45. | 00:08:53 | |
| Which are zoning map amendment? | 00:08:56 | |
| Major subdivision request and two development plan. | 00:08:58 | |
| And applications. | 00:09:02 | |
| As mentioned, this is for the petitioner JC Food Stores. | 00:09:05 | |
| Care of the Kroger Company. | 00:09:09 | |
| Pertaining to the vacant land behind the current JC Food store between Hwy. 150 and Tribe Rd. | 00:09:12 | |
| The zoning district is a PUD residential urban. | 00:09:19 | |
| Based on they are requesting a general commercial. | 00:09:24 | |
| Zone. This is in the Highlander Point Overlay district. | 00:09:28 | |
| The applicant is proposing the development of the property and the three lots to include a grocery shopping center. | 00:09:34 | |
| Fuel station and a lot dedicated for detention. | 00:09:42 | |
| Lot A will be the lot of the grocery shopping center, which is 13.9 acres. | 00:09:46 | |
| And we'll have 122,000 square foot marketplace. | 00:09:53 | |
| Track B will be the. | 00:09:59 | |
| Location of the detention. | 00:10:02 | |
| Pond and. | 00:10:04 | |
| Open space, which is 1.49 acres and Lot C will be the proposed. | 00:10:07 | |
| Fuel station location, which will include nine pumps. | 00:10:13 | |
| And is 1.11 acre. | 00:10:17 | |
| Tracks A&C will be separated by a proposed connector Rd. connecting Schreiber Road to Hwy. 150. | 00:10:22 | |
| Where there will be a traffic signal. | 00:10:29 | |
| Traffic impact study. | 00:10:32 | |
| Has been. | 00:10:34 | |
| Included with this. | 00:10:36 | |
| For this project and was conducted by Strand. | 00:10:37 | |
| The design for the limited access break. | 00:10:42 | |
| Has been. | 00:10:45 | |
| Approved by NDOT. | 00:10:46 | |
| The final approval will come once the design of the intersection is complete. | 00:10:48 | |
| Which is federal? Which is a federally funded? | 00:10:53 | |
| And we received the notice to proceed on that engineering. | 00:10:56 | |
| This week. | 00:11:00 | |
| Technical Review Committee was conducted for this project on October 23rd, 25. | 00:11:02 | |
| And likewise, A plat committee was held. | 00:11:10 | |
| December 16th, 2025. | 00:11:13 | |
| The applicant has requested several variances development standard variances for the project, primarily focused on lot A, but | 00:11:17 | |
| also. | 00:11:21 | |
| Applicable to the other lots and some. | 00:11:25 | |
| Cases. | 00:11:28 | |
| These are for facade building materials, external sidewalks along Hwy. 150, the internal sidewalks and. | 00:11:29 | |
| Total signage. | 00:11:37 | |
| A substantial amount of the property was originally. | 00:11:39 | |
| Add that all of those did receive approval at the BZA earlier tonight. | 00:11:43 | |
| A substantial amount of the property was originally zoned General Commercial, with a small portion to the north. | 00:11:50 | |
| Zoned residential, Urban. | 00:11:57 | |
| It was approved to be rezone to a planned unit development with underlying RU zoning for a mixed-use development that includes | 00:11:59 | |
| residential, urban. | 00:12:03 | |
| Homes and commercial lots along 150 and that was FC 03/22/17. So that was just a few years ago. | 00:12:08 | |
| Staff comments regarding the rezoning. | 00:12:16 | |
| The rezoning of a subject property is consistent with Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:12:19 | |
| Vision Floyd County prescribes following smart growth principles for development. | 00:12:25 | |
| With the following paramount principles preserving open space and farmway and natural gravity and critical environmental areas. | 00:12:30 | |
| Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities and to foster distinctive, attractive communities with strong sense | 00:12:37 | |
| of place. | 00:12:40 | |
| The proposal is adjacent to Hwy. 150. | 00:12:45 | |
| And intersection 64 and is adjacent to the Highlander Point Center. | 00:12:48 | |
| The will direct and strengthen development towards existing communities. | 00:12:53 | |
| It is located in the Highlander Point commercial growth area. | 00:12:57 | |
| Design guidelines for the overlay district as well as commercial development guidelines. | 00:13:01 | |
| From the Floyd County zoning ordinance, foster attractive and distinctive developments. | 00:13:06 | |
| Additionally, the property will substance was substantially zoned General commercial before the rezoning. | 00:13:11 | |
| For mixed-use development. | 00:13:18 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the current conditions of the in character of current structures. | 00:13:21 | |
| And uses in the area because the property is adjacent to the Highlander point. | 00:13:28 | |
| To highlight a point where the current JC store is located, large scale commercial and strip commercial is located there. | 00:13:33 | |
| Rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land. | 00:13:40 | |
| The property was initially substantially zoned general commercial. | 00:13:46 | |
| It is an economic growth area identified in the comp plan. | 00:13:50 | |
| It is ideally located near the Interstate and along Hwy. 150. The tract is large available. | 00:13:53 | |
| Is the large tract available? Is particularly suited for large shopping center and ancillary services such as fuel stations. | 00:14:00 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be interest to the value of the properties in the area. | 00:14:08 | |
| The rezoning is consistent with the original zoning. | 00:14:13 | |
| Of the property which is not injurious to nearby properties. | 00:14:17 | |
| Road use is consistent with long term and historic planning for the area. | 00:14:20 | |
| And the rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development. The proposed rezoning follows smart | 00:14:25 | |
| growth principles, is consistent with nearby land uses and planning documents. | 00:14:31 | |
| Adequate infrastructure is available nearby and can be brought to the property. | 00:14:36 | |
| Staff recommended conditions would. | 00:14:42 | |
| A written commitment. | 00:14:44 | |
| Property owner will commit to working with the County on the Limited Access right away break permit. | 00:14:46 | |
| The property owner will pay any required fee for the increased property value for these properties charged by and dot. | 00:14:51 | |
| Where other state agencies? | 00:14:58 | |
| As agreed to by the county. | 00:15:00 | |
| The next application is a. | 00:15:04 | |
| Major subdivision application. | 00:15:07 | |
| Staff review for this is that the petitioner has provided A preliminary site plan. | 00:15:14 | |
| In Platt, the traffic impact study was completed and provided adequate level of service once the intersection at Hwy. 150 is | 00:15:19 | |
| completed. | 00:15:24 | |
| The Soil and preliminary site report was completed for FC 3/22/17 for this property and indicated there was not a need for a phase | 00:15:29 | |
| one environmental. | 00:15:33 | |
| Were a geotechnical report and there are no wetlands or flood hazards present. | 00:15:38 | |
| Lots meet size standards for general commercial zone with access from new roads and drives. | 00:15:44 | |
| And the new public street is compliant with county standards. | 00:15:49 | |
| But needs to be named. | 00:15:53 | |
| A private access easement is needed to for the drive. Access to Lot C connection to the new public street is prohibited. | 00:15:56 | |
| As it will interfere with the intersection with Hwy. 150. | 00:16:03 | |
| Approval of the limited access break is pending with. | 00:16:08 | |
| Sidewalks. | 00:16:12 | |
| Provided throughout the development on either side of the public. Right away. Protective covenants should be provided for | 00:16:13 | |
| maintenance of sidewalks. Regional retention. | 00:16:18 | |
| Private access easement. | 00:16:22 | |
| Use in maintenance. | 00:16:24 | |
| The petitioners provided a preliminary plan for drainage. The development will utilize Lot B for. | 00:16:27 | |
| Retention Basin. | 00:16:33 | |
| Full drainage plane compliant with county stormwater regulations will be required prior to secondary approval. | 00:16:34 | |
| The petition. | 00:16:41 | |
| The petitioner will also need to provide documentation of declassification of the Blue Line stream from IDEM. | 00:16:42 | |
| DMV The petitioner has provided letters of service for the following utilities and services. Harrison RMC for electric Highlander | 00:16:49 | |
| fire District Fire Protection. | 00:16:54 | |
| Floyd Knobs Water Company for water, Center Point Energy for Gas and Clark Dietz has provided the letter from New Albany | 00:17:00 | |
| Wastewater. | 00:17:03 | |
| For sewer service. | 00:17:07 | |
| The petitioner has met the requirements of the. | 00:17:09 | |
| Subdivision control ordinance for wastewater. | 00:17:13 | |
| It provided the letter from. | 00:17:16 | |
| Clark Dietz stating that there is available infrastructure and capacity. | 00:17:18 | |
| Final approval of the connection will come from the City of New Albany. | 00:17:23 | |
| The New Albany municipal wastewater. | 00:17:28 | |
| This will was also confirmed at the TRC meeting. Staff recommendations for conditions. | 00:17:31 | |
| Prior to secondary approval, provide the following complete drainage plan. | 00:17:36 | |
| Provide documentation. Blue Lines stream has been classified, declassified from iodine and DNR. | 00:17:41 | |
| Update Plan to include an access easement for Lot C. | 00:17:47 | |
| Provide productive governance to include sidewalk maintenance and liability provisions. | 00:17:50 | |
| Private access, easement use and maintenance, and regional detection use and maintenance. | 00:17:55 | |
| Provide an easement to buffer the Creek to the northeast corner of the property, compliant with the design manual. | 00:18:00 | |
| Provide documentation of. | 00:18:07 | |
| Cooperation with Highlander Fire for the placement of fire hydrants. | 00:18:08 | |
| And provide a new street name. | 00:18:13 | |
| All right, on to the development plans. | 00:18:18 | |
| The first one is for the shopping center. | 00:18:25 | |
| As I mentioned, the petitioner has not met all the development standards for the district. | 00:18:29 | |
| The petitioner has requested for development standards variances that were granted. | 00:18:33 | |
| For signage. | 00:18:39 | |
| Building facade, internal and external sidewalks. | 00:18:41 | |
| Therefore, a waiver is required. | 00:18:45 | |
| The waiver would be consistent with the spirit and intent of the Comprehensive Plan. | 00:18:48 | |
| As it supports the development of the commercial growth area while on ensuring high quality designs. | 00:18:54 | |
| And the waiver is also consistent with the intent of the. | 00:19:12 | |
| Zoning district and Highlander overlay. The variances requested are not eliminating the required design elements, but modifying. | 00:19:16 | |
| To the unique circumstances of the property and the scale of the development. | 00:19:24 | |
| The development is a large scale commercial project located in the Highlander Point Overlay District and Growth area. There are | 00:19:34 | |
| sufficient infrastructure to support development. | 00:19:38 | |
| And has received several minor variances. | 00:19:44 | |
| Recommending. | 00:19:49 | |
| These. | 00:19:51 | |
| Buffer yard or. | 00:19:53 | |
| The fence raw material to be same material as primary structure as approved by staff. | 00:19:56 | |
| The plan showed wood. | 00:20:02 | |
| I would like to have a discussion with the developer we have. | 00:20:05 | |
| Typically required. | 00:20:08 | |
| Some masonry or vinyl or some some mix of materials for that element. | 00:20:10 | |
| When when the facade is entirely masonry. | 00:20:17 | |
| So the final application is FC-45 for the fuel station. | 00:20:24 | |
| All of the same development standards. | 00:20:34 | |
| Issues were presented in this case. | 00:20:37 | |
| With the exception, it did not require the development standard variances except for the. | 00:20:40 | |
| External sidewalk around 1:50. | 00:20:47 | |
| That's all. I just kind of summarized that last one because it's the same as as the shopping center. | 00:20:52 | |
| Do you have any questions for me before the applicant? | 00:20:59 | |
| Any questions for Nick from the board? | 00:21:03 | |
| I've got one. I kind of missed it. You'd mentioned the N dot right away Cut. You said that had been approved. We were. So the | 00:21:05 | |
| design of it has been approved. We have a letter from. | 00:21:09 | |
| Seymour office that they will prove it once we. | 00:21:14 | |
| Submit all the application materials for the permit. It's a substantial permit that takes a substantial amount of time. | 00:21:19 | |
| Some of those items will. | 00:21:27 | |
| Come from the preliminary engineering that we just started so. | 00:21:29 | |
| You know what? We'll receive it once we get everything in, but it'll take us several months to get everything in. | 00:21:34 | |
| OK. | 00:21:39 | |
| Has the stream officially been declassified? And we're just waiting on the letter or waiting for them to make the determination | 00:21:41 | |
| that it's been so? | 00:21:44 | |
| The applicants claimed that it was declassified. | 00:21:48 | |
| OK, so. | 00:21:51 | |
| We want to see the evidence of that. | 00:21:52 | |
| That's what we're What do we do if it's not been declassified? | 00:21:54 | |
| They haven't. They haven't met the condition, Yeah. | 00:21:58 | |
| They're dead. They'll have to come back. | 00:22:01 | |
| Yeah, it would be a different development. | 00:22:03 | |
| And I don't think that the rezoning is contingent on that. | 00:22:05 | |
| Good questions. Anybody else? | 00:22:11 | |
| Any more questions? | 00:22:12 | |
| Nick, thank you, Sir. | 00:22:13 | |
| All righty, at this time we'll call the. | 00:22:16 | |
| Applicant to come forward and state. | 00:22:19 | |
| Name and your address again for the record. | 00:22:22 | |
| Better remember this address system, Go ahead. | 00:22:27 | |
| Good evening John Campbell with Heritage Engineering. | 00:22:31 | |
| Address is 603 N Shore Dr. Ste. 204, Jeffersonville, IN 47130. | 00:22:35 | |
| I did put together as noted before, kind of. | 00:22:45 | |
| Break point presentation but I will just roll through it. | 00:22:48 | |
| And then a offer to answer any questions. | 00:22:52 | |
| So item number 2 on the agenda was the rezoning. | 00:22:58 | |
| I think next staff report. | 00:23:03 | |
| Clarified kind of what? | 00:23:07 | |
| What the previous zoning was, what the existing zoning is. | 00:23:09 | |
| We do want to. | 00:23:13 | |
| To rezone that or re. | 00:23:15 | |
| Kind of rezone it. | 00:23:18 | |
| Took mostly what it was before. Is that general commercial GC zoning? | 00:23:19 | |
| And that is to. | 00:23:24 | |
| Allow us to. | 00:23:26 | |
| Create a new public roadway through the property. | 00:23:27 | |
| Create the three lots with the development lot or the main primary lot being the proposed. | 00:23:30 | |
| JC Grocery and Fuel Center. | 00:23:36 | |
| Well, with the 2 two lots of that being the JC Grocery and the fuel center. | 00:23:39 | |
| And then that remaining lot being the. | 00:23:44 | |
| Dedicated area for open space and detention. | 00:23:47 | |
| And this is that zoning map. | 00:23:51 | |
| This actually had shown the old zoning. I just printed that out to capture how much of this total site was previously zoned | 00:23:54 | |
| General commercial. | 00:23:58 | |
| They're to the top of the page. Is the area that originally was. | 00:24:04 | |
| Are you zoning? | 00:24:09 | |
| Again, we want to rezone this to that commercial zone. It is in keeping with that kind of existing commercial node that you have | 00:24:11 | |
| there. | 00:24:15 | |
| Inappropriate for this area. | 00:24:20 | |
| Next item is the major subdivision. As previously mentioned, we're creating the three lots. | 00:24:24 | |
| The primary lot, lot 1 as it's noted on the actual. | 00:24:31 | |
| Subdivision. | 00:24:36 | |
| Flat. Commercial subdivision Flat. | 00:24:37 | |
| But it's actually noted as track day on the development plan is for the. | 00:24:40 | |
| Proposed JC Grocery. | 00:24:44 | |
| Which you can see there in Lot 1 Lot 2 which is noted as being track C on the development plan. | 00:24:47 | |
| Is they're kind of midpoint along Hwy. 150 and that is for the fuel center, the proposed fuel center. | 00:24:54 | |
| And then to the bottom of the page there is the track 3 or lot 3 which was noted as track. | 00:25:02 | |
| Be on our development plan. | 00:25:08 | |
| With the proposed Rd. A there. | 00:25:11 | |
| Connecting. | 00:25:14 | |
| Hwy. 150 to Schreiber Rd. | 00:25:15 | |
| Kind of separating lots 1 and 2 with the open space and detention lot being lot 3. | 00:25:18 | |
| We did prepare a. | 00:25:26 | |
| Development plans specific to the grocery that is for 123,000 square foot grocery. | 00:25:28 | |
| JC Grocery that will include internal to the store. | 00:25:36 | |
| A pharmacy. A wine and spirits section of the store. | 00:25:40 | |
| As well as a subtenant of a Starbucks. | 00:25:45 | |
| User It does have 547 parking spaces specific to the store. | 00:25:49 | |
| That lot does fully comply with the lot coverage requirements as well as the landscape planting requirements. | 00:25:55 | |
| So we are fully in compliance with that. | 00:26:04 | |
| And then as noted, the tension for that. | 00:26:07 | |
| Main store is on the. | 00:26:09 | |
| Off site open space lot which is lot 3 of that. | 00:26:12 | |
| Commercial subdivision plan. | 00:26:16 | |
| This is the overview of that showing the main grocery there. | 00:26:19 | |
| That grocery will face the new proposed Rd. A. | 00:26:23 | |
| We are providing the parking out front between Rd. A and the store. | 00:26:28 | |
| And then the detention across the way there. | 00:26:33 | |
| We did include in our submittal elevations of the store. | 00:26:38 | |
| As Nick noted, we did ask for a material variance, but just to be specific. | 00:26:43 | |
| The store does comply with the changing of materials, the banding requirements, all of the visual effects of that Highlander | 00:26:49 | |
| point. | 00:26:53 | |
| And the code requirements that the. | 00:26:58 | |
| The variance that we asked for was just specific to the windows. | 00:27:01 | |
| We did provide windows above and beyond what would be typical in a. | 00:27:05 | |
| Kroger or. | 00:27:11 | |
| Store of this size. | 00:27:12 | |
| We just could not get to that exact. | 00:27:14 | |
| Requirement, but we presented that at the BCA and we did obtain the approval of that. | 00:27:17 | |
| To the bottom there is the left elevation along Schreiber Rd. | 00:27:24 | |
| And then this shows the rear elevation of the store as well as the. | 00:27:29 | |
| Right elevation of the story, which is what would be a long highway. | 00:27:34 | |
| 150. | 00:27:38 | |
| As part of that. | 00:27:41 | |
| Project we did include a sign some sign package submittal. | 00:27:43 | |
| Which? | 00:27:47 | |
| There was a couple items we had asked for a variance for. Those were approved. | 00:27:48 | |
| But we did. | 00:27:53 | |
| We are providing monument signs at each of the intersections. | 00:27:54 | |
| And those monument signs are in compliance with code requirements. | 00:27:59 | |
| And then the last item was the development plan specific to the fuel center. | 00:28:05 | |
| That fuel center is for 9 pumps. | 00:28:11 | |
| While it is 9 individual pumps, they are double sided so they'll be a vehicle. | 00:28:14 | |
| Two vehicles at each pond. | 00:28:19 | |
| The fuel kiosk includes a. | 00:28:21 | |
| About a 200 square foot. | 00:28:24 | |
| Flock of payment window and they will have some outdoor limited outdoor merchandising. | 00:28:27 | |
| That fuel center also fully complies with the lot coverage requirements. | 00:28:34 | |
| And we did meet all of the landscape planting requirements with that plan. | 00:28:39 | |
| And as noted before, detention has been provided off site. | 00:28:43 | |
| Here is that area on the development plan. It is located there. | 00:28:48 | |
| On the screen it's to the top right. | 00:28:53 | |
| But it is located at the intersection of Hwy. 1. | 00:28:55 | |
| 50 in the new traffic signal in the new road A. | 00:28:59 | |
| Being proposed there, so it is at that intersection there. | 00:29:03 | |
| And here is a zoomed in view of that. | 00:29:08 | |
| Pointing out where the canopy with the kiosk is kind of central there. | 00:29:11 | |
| There is. | 00:29:16 | |
| A small amount of parking for employees. | 00:29:17 | |
| The tension has across the side. | 00:29:20 | |
| And Nick did clarify. | 00:29:23 | |
| He wants the restriction that there will be no direct access to proposed Rd. A. | 00:29:26 | |
| That is how we've designed the project we are providing. | 00:29:32 | |
| Secondary connections down into the Kroger parcel. | 00:29:36 | |
| And then that connects over to Rd. A. | 00:29:40 | |
| So we are in agreement with his request. | 00:29:43 | |
| And we will provide the necessary crossover agreement or access easement, whatever is determined to be appropriate. | 00:29:46 | |
| These are the elevations for the fuel Center for reference. | 00:29:56 | |
| And then this again shows the locations of the monument signs for each lot and each of those monument signs will have gold pricing | 00:30:02 | |
| as well. | 00:30:07 | |
| That is an overview of the project. | 00:30:13 | |
| There was a question about the environmental. | 00:30:17 | |
| Kroger has hired an environmental consultant. They did do that environmental study. | 00:30:24 | |
| They identified that the stream that cuts through the property is non jurisdictional. | 00:30:29 | |
| Sounds like we just need to. | 00:30:35 | |
| Ask them to submit that to the core and have them validate our findings. | 00:30:37 | |
| Don't recall in the report if it. | 00:30:42 | |
| If they've done that. | 00:30:44 | |
| But we can certainly do that as a condition, so. | 00:30:46 | |
| If that helps answer your question. | 00:30:49 | |
| With that, I'll be happy to answer any questions. Anybody have any questions? | 00:30:54 | |
| I have one that I had already asked Nick, but I'll ask it to view. So what are you doing with the other fuel station that you | 00:30:59 | |
| already have? JC already has 1, so now we're going to have. | 00:31:03 | |
| To and kind of have the market cornered up there or what I. | 00:31:06 | |
| Don't think it's necessarily the intent of Kroger to have the market cornered or deliberately have two fuel stations. | 00:31:10 | |
| This store is. | 00:31:17 | |
| Being billed on a timeline with the traffic signal installation which? | 00:31:19 | |
| Just for clarification of this board that is still. | 00:31:23 | |
| A couple years out. That won't happen until 2028. | 00:31:27 | |
| I don't think at this point Kroger has identified that they're closing the other fuel center, but that is a possibility. | 00:31:33 | |
| At this point in time, it just kind of comes down to how those traffic. | 00:31:40 | |
| Flows change. | 00:31:44 | |
| And then additionally kind of that return on that initial investment, so? | 00:31:45 | |
| As of right now, there is no plan to close it. | 00:31:50 | |
| Or keep it open. It's still kind of being evaluated. | 00:31:53 | |
| If that helps answer that question. | 00:31:56 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:31:58 | |
| I do. | 00:31:59 | |
| How many feet? | 00:32:01 | |
| Is that new? | 00:32:02 | |
| Cut off 150 to the next stoplight you know. | 00:32:04 | |
| Is it up there? | 00:32:08 | |
| 1000 feet. It's got to be over 1000 for them to approve it. | 00:32:10 | |
| It can't be any closer than 1000 feet. | 00:32:14 | |
| Yeah. So the cut is sort of. | 00:32:16 | |
| You know, within a few 100 feet of being in the mid. | 00:32:20 | |
| Between Luther Road and the old Vincennes Rd. which was kind of the controlling factor. | 00:32:24 | |
| And it did fall and I don't remember the exact distance. | 00:32:30 | |
| But it did fall. | 00:32:34 | |
| Within, well, I actually have it on my plane. | 00:32:36 | |
| It is. | 00:32:39 | |
| 1570. | 00:32:40 | |
| And I I will correct what I just said. The other direction is 2780 feet, so not exactly half certainly. | 00:32:43 | |
| Kind of trying to be at that midpoint. | 00:32:51 | |
| What are they going to do with the? | 00:32:53 | |
| Oh my God. | 00:32:55 | |
| The existing JC door. | 00:32:58 | |
| That is a leased property, so that would be up to that property owner to yeah. | 00:33:01 | |
| To say what their plans are for that. | 00:33:07 | |
| Anybody else? I have a question where you have an answer. | 00:33:10 | |
| Do you know what the elevation? | 00:33:14 | |
| Will be on the building versus the the 1:50 just approximately. | 00:33:15 | |
| I do know that, but I don't have it with me. | 00:33:22 | |
| But I think as as if you're familiar with the property. | 00:33:27 | |
| 150 would kind of be on the low side. Schreiber Rd. would be on the high side. | 00:33:31 | |
| As I recall, we're kind of put that midpoint or close to midpoint between those two allocations. | 00:33:36 | |
| I I do have questions. Go ahead. | 00:33:43 | |
| And maybe for Nick or for technical review committee? | 00:33:45 | |
| Was there any discussion or possibility? | 00:33:49 | |
| To have a connector Rd. between Highlander Point and this property. | 00:33:52 | |
| To alleviate. | 00:33:58 | |
| People going back out on 150 or you? | 00:34:01 | |
| I I see a. | 00:34:04 | |
| Increase in Schreiber. | 00:34:06 | |
| To get to the store. | 00:34:08 | |
| The current doesn't do. I don't know if you want to. The current design that we put forth does not include any connectivity. I | 00:34:11 | |
| didn't know if there was a place there for that. | 00:34:15 | |
| Now we have not included that at this point in time. | 00:34:20 | |
| OK, ****. | 00:34:27 | |
| Would be was it? | 00:34:32 | |
| We didn't. | 00:34:35 | |
| Require or ask them to add. | 00:34:36 | |
| Connection to Hwy. or to the Highlander Point Center. | 00:34:40 | |
| A previous development. | 00:34:45 | |
| For this property, the PUD had a connection to to that and the. | 00:34:47 | |
| Owner of Highlander appointed at that time did not want one. Obviously this is a different project. | 00:34:51 | |
| In a different location where? | 00:34:59 | |
| Potential connection could occur additionally. | 00:35:00 | |
| Hiring a point doesn't have any public. | 00:35:04 | |
| Grows inside of it. | 00:35:08 | |
| So we would be connecting them. | 00:35:10 | |
| Public Rd. directly to a private stand. So there's there's a few things that need to be worked out to to accommodate that. It's | 00:35:12 | |
| not out of question, but. | 00:35:16 | |
| Yeah, I'm just thinking. | 00:35:20 | |
| It might be good for both property owners. | 00:35:22 | |
| Didn't involve the government at all, but. | 00:35:25 | |
| It might be good for both. Thank you anybody else? | 00:35:28 | |
| OK at this time. | 00:35:33 | |
| Are going to open up to public comment, let me say that. | 00:35:36 | |
| When you come up you spent you state your name and address. | 00:35:39 | |
| And your comments come to the board. You're not allowed to ask the petitioner or the engineer anybody any comments, We'll get | 00:35:43 | |
| those answers for you. | 00:35:47 | |
| When you come up. So at this time, we'll open up the. | 00:35:52 | |
| The floor to Anybody have any favorable comments for the project? | 00:35:55 | |
| It looks like there's nobody there now. We'd like to have anybody in opposition. | 00:36:01 | |
| To this project, please come forward, state your name and address. | 00:36:05 | |
| Please come forward, Sir. | 00:36:09 | |
| My name is Claude Harrelson. | 00:36:17 | |
| Is that all you need? Just to name address please? 4059 Tanglewood Dr. Boyd Knobs. It's all Buck Creek. | 00:36:21 | |
| My comments would be. | 00:36:29 | |
| Going along with what he asked about the Connector Rd. | 00:36:31 | |
| I would ask that that would be a. | 00:36:34 | |
| Stipulation that they at least go with the previous owner to find out if this changes their minds since it's not a subdivision. | 00:36:36 | |
| Going in but a commercial property? | 00:36:42 | |
| Regardless if it's a public road or not. | 00:36:44 | |
| Just to cut down traffic on Hwy. 150. | 00:36:46 | |
| I know that anytime that you, you see a shopping center built when they close off that. | 00:36:51 | |
| That go between then you have people going in. | 00:36:55 | |
| Into the main traffic and then back out. | 00:36:58 | |
| Which just intensifies the chance of a. | 00:37:01 | |
| Accident. | 00:37:04 | |
| The other thing would be my question would be. | 00:37:06 | |
| If this could be billed without the filling station. | 00:37:08 | |
| That's just going to add additional traffic. | 00:37:12 | |
| And since Kroger doesn't know if they're going to keep it open, the old JC. | 00:37:15 | |
| Or close it. | 00:37:19 | |
| Then why not? | 00:37:21 | |
| Build it without it. | 00:37:22 | |
| That would eliminate a lot of in and out traffic that's not even going into the store. | 00:37:24 | |
| Which would cut down. | 00:37:29 | |
| Additional. | 00:37:31 | |
| Accidents, possibly. | 00:37:32 | |
| But. | 00:37:35 | |
| If secondly, one open and one. | 00:37:36 | |
| By not building this one, they'll leave that one open. | 00:37:39 | |
| We won't have an empty station. | 00:37:42 | |
| In 2029 or 2028 whenever they open it. | 00:37:43 | |
| And then my what was this? | 00:37:49 | |
| There was a includes a. | 00:37:52 | |
| Drugstore. | 00:37:54 | |
| WNS and a Starbucks. I didn't know what WNS? | 00:37:55 | |
| W Why I'm in spirits. | 00:37:58 | |
| Liquor store, it's going to be the package store, OK. | 00:38:00 | |
| And one last thing was. | 00:38:04 | |
| Did they address how they're building? | 00:38:05 | |
| In and outs for Schreiber Rd. Is that going to be? | 00:38:08 | |
| Is that going to be open? | 00:38:12 | |
| To where that road you, you all know that roads in terrible shape. And if it's not, if something's not done before 2028? | 00:38:14 | |
| That's definitely going to be. | 00:38:20 | |
| Bad access point. | 00:38:22 | |
| We go back and forth on that road just to avoid Hwy. 150. | 00:38:24 | |
| But if there's going to be cars going in and out of that subdivision, shopping center. | 00:38:28 | |
| I would ask that the. | 00:38:33 | |
| Council do something restricting traffic on that. | 00:38:34 | |
| It's a good idea to restrict the traffic into the shop into the gas station. | 00:38:37 | |
| From that new road, but I would also think it would help to. | 00:38:41 | |
| Limited from Schreiber Rd. as well if the county wanted to widen that road. | 00:38:44 | |
| We should have started two years ago, agree. | 00:38:49 | |
| It never happens that way, but you know. | 00:38:52 | |
| Maybe you can do something about. | 00:38:55 | |
| Limited in that road access. | 00:38:57 | |
| We talk about it a lot. | 00:38:59 | |
| That's all I have. Thank you. All right, thank you. | 00:39:02 | |
| OK. Anybody else like to come forward? | 00:39:05 | |
| Completely up state your name and address. Thank you very much. | 00:39:08 | |
| Rick Ellis be I live at 7407 Jersey Park Rd. Floyd Knox. | 00:39:14 | |
| I just like to. | 00:39:18 | |
| Build back on what Frank said about the conjoining 2 properties, possibly Highlander Point and the. | 00:39:20 | |
| JC Center I think have a lot of benefits traffic pattern wise. | 00:39:25 | |
| Just community wise to people not have to go back out on the Interstate or. | 00:39:29 | |
| Go back on Tracker Road and she eliminates some of the traffic off Shriver Rd. | 00:39:33 | |
| I don't know how Krogers do their truck pattern for the delivery, so they'll be coming up one bit to your. | 00:39:38 | |
| Traver, but with the design, it's probably going to be a little bit congested too, because there's. | 00:39:44 | |
| Is very normal. I don't have a trucks a day they do probably. | 00:39:48 | |
| 20 to 50 trucks a day coming there every day. | 00:39:51 | |
| Oh everything to use the proposed Rd. A being a private road, I wasn't. | 00:39:55 | |
| Or excuse me, a public Rd. I wasn't aware of that. | 00:40:00 | |
| How's that being funded and who's going to maintain that road is that? | 00:40:03 | |
| You want to be a public girl float tenant anymore? | 00:40:07 | |
| Floyd County got repaid. Floyd County is snow removal that the road going from 1:50 to shrubbery proposed. | 00:40:09 | |
| Once they build it. | 00:40:16 | |
| Being dedicated to the county. | 00:40:17 | |
| They'll turn it over. | 00:40:21 | |
| OK, but they will pay. | 00:40:22 | |
| For the initial. | 00:40:24 | |
| They're going to have to. We don't have the money. | 00:40:25 | |
| I don't think we will. | 00:40:29 | |
| Tax dollars participate. No crowded. | 00:40:31 | |
| And that develop, you know, we're going to be limited as government to tell 2 private. | 00:40:33 | |
| People, what to do? | 00:40:38 | |
| But if you guys could get together and figure out a way it had a little conversation with Marley and bring it to Nick then. | 00:40:39 | |
| It would probably be good for you and good for that, obvious good for everybody, community especially, but I just don't know where | 00:40:46 | |
| you would put it. Support that. I've got some ideas where you can put it. | 00:40:50 | |
| You guys work that out? | 00:40:55 | |
| We'd be interested to listen to it, OK. | 00:40:56 | |
| Appreciate it. Thanks. Thank you, Sir. | 00:40:59 | |
| OK. Anybody else? | 00:41:02 | |
| All right at this time. | 00:41:06 | |
| Mr. John, if you'd like to come back and you got 5 minutes to talk about any of the issues that were brought up. | 00:41:08 | |
| Thank you. I'll just clarify a couple items. I did confirm that as part of that environmental assessment that Kroger did. | 00:41:15 | |
| That was submitted to the Court of Engineers and they did accept that that it is a non jurisdictional waterway. So. | 00:41:24 | |
| If we haven't provided that to Nick, we will certainly do that and make it part of the record. | 00:41:32 | |
| As to the shared connectivity to the new proposed Rd. A. | 00:41:37 | |
| We're committed to continuing that discussion with that property owner, but. | 00:41:43 | |
| At this time. | 00:41:46 | |
| Absolutely agreed to connection. | 00:41:48 | |
| And then the other gentleman, I think is. | 00:41:52 | |
| Questions and comments were a little more. | 00:41:55 | |
| Big picture, high level, not plan specific so I don't have anything. | 00:41:57 | |
| Add to that. | 00:42:02 | |
| With that, I'll be happy to answer any new questions that. | 00:42:03 | |
| You may have. | 00:42:06 | |
| All right. Any questions? | 00:42:08 | |
| Mr. Campbell. | 00:42:10 | |
| You might not build that. | 00:42:12 | |
| Fuel new fuel station right away, correct? | 00:42:13 | |
| Will be built if. | 00:42:16 | |
| If it's decided not to be built, that would be considered an outline of the. The intent is that it will be an outline of the | 00:42:18 | |
| Kroger Center. | 00:42:22 | |
| We're here today to ask for permission to build that if for some reason that is not built. | 00:42:27 | |
| When the store opens. | 00:42:33 | |
| It could be built later or they may make a decision to sell off that property. | 00:42:36 | |
| If that was to happen, that plan would have to come back before you for approval at that time. | 00:42:41 | |
| That's correct. | 00:42:47 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:42:49 | |
| Yeah, go ahead, Sir. | 00:42:51 | |
| So what is what is before this board is a zoning map amendment and a subdivision. | 00:42:52 | |
| Control approval. | 00:42:57 | |
| The conditional use for a fuel center on that lot was approved earlier tonight by the BZA. | 00:43:00 | |
| So if the if it is rezone. | 00:43:06 | |
| They can build it if they like. | 00:43:08 | |
| Have the conditional use or they could decide to go a different way with their. | 00:43:10 | |
| They're they're probably all right. Thank you, Nick. | 00:43:14 | |
| Thank you, Mr. Campbell. | 00:43:17 | |
| All righty. OK, that ends the public. | 00:43:19 | |
| Comment portion at this time. | 00:43:23 | |
| I'm looking for somebody to present a ballot for our. | 00:43:25 | |
| I have a ballot. OK, Mr. Mr. It's got a ballot. Go ahead. And this is for FC 122542. | 00:43:33 | |
| Yeah, 42. OK. All right, go ahead. | 00:43:42 | |
| For Docket FC122542, JC Food Stores. | 00:43:47 | |
| Under the Floyd County zoning ordinance. | 00:43:53 | |
| 2006. | 00:43:56 | |
| Reviewing the zoning amendment petition, the Planning Commission, the county commissioner shall. | 00:43:58 | |
| Pay reasonable regard to the following. | 00:44:03 | |
| The Floyd County comprehensive plan in any applicable. | 00:44:06 | |
| Adopted planning studies of reports. | 00:44:10 | |
| Current conditions in the character. | 00:44:12 | |
| Current structures and uses of each district. | 00:44:15 | |
| The most desirable use. | 00:44:18 | |
| Of which the land for each district is adapted. | 00:44:19 | |
| The conservation of property values throughout Floyd County and responsible growth and development. | 00:44:23 | |
| After careful reviews, Floyd County Planning Commission finds that. | 00:44:29 | |
| One, the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:44:34 | |
| Because Floyd County follows smart growth principles for development with the following paramount. | 00:44:40 | |
| Principles We want to preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental. | 00:44:46 | |
| Areas, yeah. | 00:44:52 | |
| We want to strengthen and direct development toward existing communities. | 00:44:54 | |
| We want to foster distinctive, attractive communities with strong sense of place. | 00:44:58 | |
| #10. | 00:45:04 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is. | 00:45:05 | |
| Consistent with current conditions in the character of current structures and uses in the area. | 00:45:08 | |
| Because the property it's adjacent to the Highlander Point shopping center. | 00:45:14 | |
| And there are large commercial strip, which is a large commercial strip. | 00:45:19 | |
| Area, uh. | 00:45:23 | |
| And it's on both sides of 1. | 00:45:24 | |
| The. | 00:45:28 | |
| Of this subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of land. | 00:45:30 | |
| Because the property is in the economic growth area defined in Floyd County's comprehensive plan. | 00:45:35 | |
| Is also ideally located on US150 near I-64. | 00:45:41 | |
| The property is well suited for continuation of the shopping district. | 00:45:46 | |
| And ancillary services in a fuel station. | 00:45:50 | |
| #4 the rezoning of the subject. | 00:45:55 | |
| Property will not. | 00:45:57 | |
| Being juries to the value of the other properties in the area. | 00:45:59 | |
| Because the rezoning. | 00:46:02 | |
| Is not injurious to. | 00:46:07 | |
| Nearby properties or the proposal is consistent with long-term historic planning of the 150 corridor. | 00:46:09 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support. | 00:46:16 | |
| Responsible growth and development in the area because. | 00:46:20 | |
| Proposed rezoning follows the county smart growth principles and are consistent with nearby land use. | 00:46:23 | |
| Adequate infrastructure is available. | 00:46:30 | |
| Nearby and can be brought to the project. | 00:46:33 | |
| Upon careful reviews, Floyd County Planning Commission hereby makes a favorable. | 00:46:36 | |
| Recommendation to. | 00:46:41 | |
| On the petitioners zoning amendment application. | 00:46:45 | |
| This day, the 12th of January 20. | 00:46:48 | |
| 26. | 00:46:51 | |
| The favorable recommendation is made based on the following written commitments. | 00:46:52 | |
| Property owners shall commit to working with the county on a limited access right away break permit. | 00:46:57 | |
| Property shall pay any required. | 00:47:04 | |
| Fee for the increased property value for those properties. | 00:47:08 | |
| Charged by N, dot or other state agencies. | 00:47:12 | |
| That's my valley. | 00:47:15 | |
| All right, we have about any discussion. | 00:47:17 | |
| Second question. | 00:47:19 | |
| I need a second. | 00:47:21 | |
| You second, I'll second, area second. Any discussion? | 00:47:23 | |
| That being none, all OK, go ahead Mr. | 00:47:28 | |
| As I commented earlier, I would. | 00:47:33 | |
| Suggest adding as approved by the county for the written commitment, just so that we're not. | 00:47:36 | |
| Staff. | 00:47:43 | |
| Staff or by county because this is. | 00:47:44 | |
| Commissioner issue that's yet to be negotiated, so I just want. | 00:47:47 | |
| To leave that a little wider open. | 00:47:52 | |
| He sang on the written commitment at the end as A to add as approved by the county. | 00:47:56 | |
| Because that will ultimately then. | 00:48:01 | |
| OK, we have we have an amendment to the ballot. You want to read the amendment, please. | 00:48:25 | |
| My amendment is on the favorable recommendation is based on the following written commitments. | 00:48:29 | |
| Number one, the property owner shall commit to working with the county on the limited access. | 00:48:36 | |
| Right away break permit. | 00:48:40 | |
| Property shell. | 00:48:42 | |
| Pay any required. | 00:48:43 | |
| Fee for the increased property value for those properties charged by N, dot and other state agencies as approved by the county. | 00:48:45 | |
| That's sufficient. | 00:48:54 | |
| All righty. We've got an amended. I need a second on the amendment. We have a second. Any further discussion? | 00:48:56 | |
| That being none, all in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:49:03 | |
| All right, it passes. | 00:49:09 | |
| Thank you. | 00:49:10 | |
| All right, now we're looking for a ballot. | 00:49:11 | |
| 44343 Larry has a ballot. | 00:49:14 | |
| No. | 00:49:23 | |
| Ballot for primary approval a major subdivision. | 00:49:24 | |
| Docket FC12-205-43. | 00:49:28 | |
| Applicant JC Food Stores. | 00:49:31 | |
| Petitioner has met all the following requirements. A. | 00:49:34 | |
| Preliminary plan provided BE certification demonstrates compliance with that DEM. | 00:49:38 | |
| Rule 5. See the plat. | 00:49:43 | |
| Identifying all pertinent information pursuant to SCO and Deployed County. | 00:49:47 | |
| Plan planning and zoning. | 00:49:52 | |
| Commissioner, Rules of Procedures. | 00:49:54 | |
| DG of Technical read. | 00:49:56 | |
| Report provided. | 00:49:58 | |
| A solar report was completed under FC O 3/22/17. | 00:49:59 | |
| E Traffic impact study was provided. | 00:50:05 | |
| If phase one Environmental Audit report provided. | 00:50:08 | |
| It's not required because we had one from a preliminary site report completed and submitted under FC3-202-17. | 00:50:13 | |
| A new one one required. | 00:50:22 | |
| Gee site plan provided. | 00:50:24 | |
| That shows topographic wetlands. | 00:50:25 | |
| Flood hazard areas. Steep slopes. | 00:50:28 | |
| And soil shown in. | 00:50:31 | |
| Soil survey for Floyd County is having severe limitations on Urban Development. | 00:50:32 | |
| H Lots, all lights go. | 00:50:39 | |
| With the Floyd counties opening audits requirement for general commercial. | 00:50:40 | |
| Streets. The new streets. | 00:50:44 | |
| Is compliant with county standards. | 00:50:46 | |
| #2. | 00:50:51 | |
| The new street serving the development meets the surface type and the right of way requirements #3 the new street. | 00:50:53 | |
| Has not been named #4 there are not. | 00:50:59 | |
| Any pertinent debt? | 00:51:02 | |
| Permanent dead end streets however a private easement is needed for the private drive to. | 00:51:03 | |
| Access Lot C. | 00:51:08 | |
| #5. | 00:51:10 | |
| In MDOT approval is pending. | 00:51:11 | |
| For the limited access break. | 00:51:14 | |
| Number six curbs and gutters conformity I dot standard specification. | 00:51:16 | |
| J Driveways, intersections, and entrances. | 00:51:21 | |
| 2 subdivision entrances. | 00:51:24 | |
| Where 50 or more lights proposed. | 00:51:27 | |
| #2 Driveway separation meets the requirements of the SEO. | 00:51:32 | |
| #3 All driveways and intersections are located in accordance with the. | 00:51:36 | |
| OK, sidewalks are provided. | 00:51:41 | |
| Throughout the development on either side of the public Rd. | 00:51:43 | |
| L Protective covenants are required but have not been provided for maintenance and repair. | 00:51:48 | |
| Of sidewalks and regional detention and private easements use and maintenance. | 00:51:53 | |
| #2 Petitioner has met the final requirements for drainage and stormwater. | 00:51:57 | |
| At DNR, approval is required for alterations up to the natural drainage pasture. | 00:52:04 | |
| Pattern and natural stream patterns caused by construction. The petitioner will. | 00:52:08 | |
| Also need to provide documentation of the declassification of the Blue Line stream. | 00:52:13 | |
| From Adam and DNR. | 00:52:18 | |
| Be full drainage plans. | 00:52:20 | |
| Compliant with the county stormwater regulations will be required prior to secondary approval. | 00:52:22 | |
| Development we utilize like B for detention basin. | 00:52:27 | |
| See Primary Drainage plan. | 00:52:30 | |
| Was provide a preliminary drainage plan was provided. | 00:52:32 | |
| 3 Petitioner has provided. | 00:52:35 | |
| A letter. | 00:52:38 | |
| Provided letters confirming availability and willingness to serve. | 00:52:39 | |
| For all necessary utilities, water, sewage, fire. | 00:52:43 | |
| Gas and electric. | 00:52:46 | |
| #4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer. | 00:52:48 | |
| And. | 00:52:51 | |
| True service. | 00:52:52 | |
| They service for the subdivision lights will be. | 00:52:54 | |
| Extended to an IDE. Improved municipal. | 00:52:58 | |
| Our county owned or. | 00:53:02 | |
| Or operate sanitary sewer system. | 00:53:04 | |
| Decision Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants. | 00:53:08 | |
| The petitioner. Primary approval. | 00:53:12 | |
| Primary approval. | 00:53:16 | |
| For a major subdivision at the meeting held on the 12th day of January 2026. | 00:53:18 | |
| Primary approval. | 00:53:22 | |
| It's based on collision the following conditions. | 00:53:24 | |
| Number one, complete drainage plan. | 00:53:27 | |
| #2 for bad documentation that the Blue Line stream has been declassified. | 00:53:29 | |
| From our dem #3 update plan to include an access easement for Lot C. | 00:53:34 | |
| #4 Provide. | 00:53:40 | |
| Protective covenants to include sidewalk maintenance, liability provisions, Private access easement. | 00:53:41 | |
| Use and Maintenance and Regional detention Use and maintenance #5 Provide an easement to buffer the Creek in this northwest corner | 00:53:47 | |
| of the property compliant with the. | 00:53:51 | |
| With the design manual number six, provide documentation. | 00:53:56 | |
| Of cooperation with Highlander fire for placement of hadrons #7 provide. | 00:54:00 | |
| Named for the new street. | 00:54:05 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 00:54:09 | |
| Just for just for clarification, when you're reading off the conditions for secondary approval, correct? | 00:54:11 | |
| Yes, OK. | 00:54:17 | |
| I thought I heard primary. It does say that. That's just what I read. It should be secondary. | 00:54:18 | |
| He said I didn't, but not DNR for the. | 00:54:24 | |
| The stream doesn't need to have both listed. | 00:54:26 | |
| I have both listed, I just didn't read 1 of them. | 00:54:29 | |
| Sorry. | 00:54:33 | |
| No, OK. | 00:54:35 | |
| OK, thank you. I need a second and I need a discussion. | 00:54:37 | |
| Anymore discussion? | 00:54:42 | |
| If none. | 00:54:44 | |
| All in favor. Think about that. | 00:54:45 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. It passes, Thank you very much. | 00:54:48 | |
| All right, you've got 2. | 00:54:53 | |
| And then grab that one there. | 00:55:00 | |
| What? | 00:55:01 | |
| This one right away. | 00:55:10 | |
| No, we're fine. I just don't want to get mixed up so I. | 00:55:12 | |
| OK, at this time we need a ballot for. | 00:55:18 | |
| 44. | 00:55:21 | |
| I have a ballot, all right. French got a ballot. | 00:55:26 | |
| Thank you, Frank. | 00:55:29 | |
| All right. Thanks. | 00:55:36 | |
| You said 44, correct? Yes, Sir. | 00:55:50 | |
| Jacques Store 091, docket number. | 00:55:57 | |
| FC 122544. | 00:56:01 | |
| Conceptual site plan review by Planning Director with YES on 12/16/25. | 00:56:05 | |
| I wasn't sure if that was correct date was that. | 00:56:11 | |
| The initial time was 10/3. | 00:56:19 | |
| So I should change that date. | 00:56:22 | |
| Yeah, I I wasn't sure in that 10/3. | 00:56:24 | |
| Findings that the petitioner has not met all the development standards for the district. | 00:56:34 | |
| Petitioner has requested variances from the development standards from the BTA for. | 00:56:40 | |
| The facade, building material, signage, internal sidewalk, pedestrian connection, and external sidewalk. | 00:56:46 | |
| A waiver of the development standards requirement is required. If required, a waiver of the development standard is granted. | 00:56:54 | |
| Because the waiver supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring high quality design. | 00:57:02 | |
| A waiver is consistent with the Spirit intent. | 00:57:10 | |
| Of the comprehensive plan because the waiver supports the development of the commercial growth area while ensuring high quality | 00:57:13 | |
| design. | 00:57:17 | |
| Be a waiver is consistent with the intent of the district. | 00:57:21 | |
| Because the requested variances are not eliminating the required design elements, but modifying them. | 00:57:25 | |
| To the property characteristics. | 00:57:33 | |
| And the scale of our development. | 00:57:35 | |
| The proposed development is consistent with the comprehensive plan because the development is a commercial project. | 00:57:38 | |
| Located upon Highlander Point District and Economic Growth Area, sufficient infrastructure exists to support the. | 00:57:45 | |
| Project The proposed development plan is consistent with the intent of the district and set forth in Floyd County. | 00:57:52 | |
| Zoning ordinance because the development meets the standards for the district with minor variances. | 00:58:01 | |
| And are appropriate for the location and scale of the project. | 00:58:07 | |
| The proposed development plan does satisfy. | 00:58:11 | |
| The following development requirements. | 00:58:15 | |
| A signage is designed to create a unified and consistent sign package. Yes. | 00:58:18 | |
| Design and location of the street access points minimize congestion. Yes. | 00:58:23 | |
| Entrance entrances, streets, internal traffic facilities. | 00:58:29 | |
| Are compatible with existing planned streets and adjacent development, yes. | 00:58:34 | |
| Design and layout of the development has a clear circulation pattern that is sensitive to the topography and other natural | 00:58:40 | |
| features. Yes. | 00:58:44 | |
| Design of the proposed development plan provides adequate pedestrian connections within the development and safe St. crossings. | 00:58:48 | |
| To adjacent. | 00:58:56 | |
| Land uses, yes. | 00:58:57 | |
| As much as possible. | 00:58:59 | |
| Lighting is designed to create. | 00:59:02 | |
| A unified and consistent lighting package for the development. Yes. Lighting and parking areas did not exceed 20 feet in height, | 00:59:04 | |
| Yes. | 00:59:08 | |
| The proposed development is not in a residential urban. | 00:59:13 | |
| The proposed development is not a multi family development. | 00:59:17 | |
| If the proposed development is located in a residential urban district. | 00:59:21 | |
| Multifamily development is proposed. | 00:59:25 | |
| The development does satisfy the requirements of the recreational space and open space. | 00:59:28 | |
| An open space. | 00:59:33 | |
| The proposed development is located in the Highlander Point district of The Edge. | 00:59:35 | |
| Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:59:39 | |
| If the proposed development is located in Highlander Point Gateway District in the Edwardsville. | 00:59:42 | |
| Gateway District. | 00:59:48 | |
| The following requirements have been met. | 00:59:49 | |
| Building facades that face any adjacent St. have a finished. | 00:59:53 | |
| Facade. | 00:59:59 | |
| Loading docks and trash collection bins are not placed. | 01:00:00 | |
| On or along the. | 01:00:04 | |
| The facade that face any adjacent St. Yes. | 01:00:06 | |
| Accommodation for the community space where? | 01:00:11 | |
| Proposed commercial development has over 100,000 square foot. | 01:00:14 | |
| Either. | 01:00:18 | |
| Combination of buildings or. | 01:00:19 | |
| Lots in a cohesive commercial development. | 01:00:22 | |
| Project. | 01:00:26 | |
| It does not apply. | 01:00:27 | |
| Open space requirement on section 904. | 01:00:29 | |
| How many ordinance are not did not apply? | 01:00:34 | |
| THE DECISION. Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby approves the petitioners. | 01:00:38 | |
| Development plan application. | 01:00:44 | |
| At the meeting held on the 12th day of January 2026. | 01:00:46 | |
| OK. | 01:00:53 | |
| We need a second for that. | 01:00:55 | |
| I will second. | 01:00:57 | |
| All right then we need helping for any discussion please. | 01:00:58 | |
| Do we need to add in the approval contingent upon even though this was, we already know that they have it or? | 01:01:01 | |
| Just making sure that we. | 01:01:10 | |
| All right. Thank you for all right that point. No other comments all in favor signify by. | 01:01:13 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:01:19 | |
| It passes. Thank you. | 01:01:21 | |
| All right, while we get that ready, somebody needs to be thinking who's going to do #4-45? | 01:01:24 | |
| I need a ballot. I can do 45. | 01:01:32 | |
| All right, we do have a ballot. | 01:01:34 | |
| Nope. | 01:01:38 | |
| Scribbled on the wrong way. | 01:01:44 | |
| All right, Docket FC1225-45. | 01:01:48 | |
| Petitioner JC Food Stores. | 01:01:51 | |
| Conceptual pipe. | 01:01:54 | |
| Site plan review by planning director, Yes. | 01:01:55 | |
| Finding one petitioner has not met all the developmental standards for the district #2 waiver. | 01:01:59 | |
| Of the development standards requirements is required. | 01:02:06 | |
| It required a waiver of development standards is granted because a a waiver is consistent with the spirit and intent of the | 01:02:09 | |
| Comprehensive plan because the waiver supports the development. | 01:02:14 | |
| Of the commercial growth area while ensuring high quality design. | 01:02:20 | |
| A waiver is consistent with the 10 of the district because the variance. | 01:02:24 | |
| Requested or not eliminating. | 01:02:28 | |
| The required design elements, but modifying them to a unique circumstances of the property and the scale of the development. | 01:02:30 | |
| #3 The proposed development is consistent with a comprehensive plan. | 01:02:37 | |
| Because the overall development is a large commercial project located in the Highlander Point Overlay District and Economic Growth | 01:02:41 | |
| area. | 01:02:45 | |
| And there is sufficient infrastructure to support the development. | 01:02:48 | |
| #4 The pros development is consistent with the intent of the district. | 01:02:53 | |
| As set forth in Florida County Zoning yardage because it developed substantially meets the standards of the district. | 01:02:57 | |
| Where they're minor variance. | 01:03:02 | |
| Appropriate for the location of the proposal. | 01:03:04 | |
| The use is an allowed condition use in the district. | 01:03:08 | |
| #5 The proposed development does. | 01:03:11 | |
| Satisfy the following. | 01:03:14 | |
| Development Requirements A signage is designed to create a unified and consistent sign package. | 01:03:16 | |
| Be design and location of streets access points. | 01:03:21 | |
| Enter mass congestion. See entrances, streets and internal traffic facilities. | 01:03:24 | |
| Are compatible with existing. | 01:03:30 | |
| Plant streets and adjacent developments D Design and. | 01:03:32 | |
| And layout of the developments as a clears. | 01:03:35 | |
| Circulation pattern that is sensitive to total. | 01:03:37 | |
| Topography. | 01:03:40 | |
| And other natural features design of. | 01:03:41 | |
| Proposed development plan provides adequate. | 01:03:44 | |
| Pedestrian Connect. | 01:03:46 | |
| Connections within the development of safe St. crossings to adjacent land uses. | 01:03:48 | |
| F Lighting is designed to create a unified and consistent light package for the development. | 01:03:52 | |
| G lighting is. | 01:03:57 | |
| And parking areas. | 01:03:58 | |
| Do not exceed 20 feet in height. | 01:03:59 | |
| Number six, the program is not in a residential. | 01:04:02 | |
| Residents are the proposed development is not in the multifamily. | 01:04:06 | |
| Development #7 the proposed. | 01:04:11 | |
| Government is located in the Highlander Point District. | 01:04:14 | |
| And the following requirements have been met. | 01:04:17 | |
| A building facade that faced any adjacent streets have finished facades be. | 01:04:19 | |
| Loading docks and trash collecting vans are not placed. | 01:04:24 | |
| On or along the facades that face the adjacent streets. | 01:04:27 | |
| Decision upon careful review, the Floyd County Commission. | 01:04:34 | |
| Hereby approves the petitioners. | 01:04:37 | |
| Development plan. | 01:04:40 | |
| Application at the meeting held on the 12th of January 2026 that completes my ballot. | 01:04:41 | |
| OK, we have a ballot. I need a second. | 01:04:47 | |
| We have a second any discussion? | 01:04:49 | |
| Seeing none all in favor signify by aye, those opposed likewise. | 01:04:53 | |
| Thank you. | 01:04:59 | |
| All right. That was the last agenda. Do you have some discussion, Nick? | 01:05:00 | |
| I do just want to provide 1 update the technical review committee. | 01:05:07 | |
| Met on December the 18th to review. | 01:05:11 | |
| A proposed development at 200 Tuscany. | 01:05:15 | |
| It is a by right developing a commercial district for a medical. | 01:05:19 | |
| Offices. | 01:05:24 | |
| Total of 15,000 square foot across two stories in that W 12th group. | 01:05:26 | |
| All right, and that. | 01:05:33 | |
| Yet no other further about business. | 01:05:35 | |
| OK, before we close, I just would like to. | 01:05:38 | |
| Thank Frank and thank Larry for presenting the ballots tonight. It definitely helps when people share that because you're you lose | 01:05:41 | |
| your voice eventually. So thank both of you guys for doing that for us. | 01:05:47 | |
| Appreciate that. | 01:05:53 | |
| All right. Before you leave, I want to be sure everybody has signed. | 01:05:55 | |
| The proper. | 01:05:58 | |
| Let me make sure I sign it. | 01:06:00 | |
| And I want to be sure that Christy says that we can go. | 01:06:02 | |
| Before we adjourn. | 01:06:05 | |
| Do not want to get in trouble. | 01:06:07 | |
| Oh, we're missing somebody. | 01:06:26 | |
| It's the last bowel we just had. Yep, OK. | 01:06:28 | |
| OK, I need a motion to adjourn. | 01:06:38 | |
| So moved OK. | 01:06:41 | |
| We got a second see you guys all in favor segment if I buy. | 01:06:43 | |
| All right. See you guys. Thanks. | 01:06:46 | |
| All righty. | 01:06:49 |