Floyd County Plan Commission
Live stream not working or buffering in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| At this time, I'd like to call to order the February 10th the Floyd County Planning Commission. At this time, we'd like to stand | 00:00:13 | |
| and honor our flag, please. | 00:00:17 | |
| United States of America. | 00:00:23 | |
| And to Republic, for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:26 | |
| OK, at this time I'd like to have a roll call. | 00:00:36 | |
| Here. | 00:00:39 | |
| Present. | 00:00:44 | |
| Yeah. | 00:00:46 | |
| Here. | 00:00:47 | |
| Here. | 00:00:50 | |
| Here. | 00:00:51 | |
| Here. | 00:00:53 | |
| Alrighty, one shorter board member. That's eight of us, correct? | 00:00:55 | |
| All right. | 00:00:58 | |
| At this time. | 00:01:01 | |
| We'd like to have the minutes of the December. | 00:01:03 | |
| Fruit. I'm going to take a look at those and make a motion. | 00:01:07 | |
| I make a motion that we approve the December Planning Commission. | 00:01:15 | |
| Minutes. All right. Thank you. I have a. | 00:01:18 | |
| Motion any second. | 00:01:21 | |
| Awesome. Go ahead. | 00:01:24 | |
| I got a second, but John any. | 00:01:25 | |
| Conversation. | 00:01:27 | |
| Discussion. | 00:01:29 | |
| At that time, we take a motion all in favor. | 00:01:30 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. Thank you. Approved. Thank you. | 00:01:33 | |
| All righty. We have no old business. Is that correct, Nick? | 00:01:36 | |
| OK, this time we'd like to agenda number item number one, we have have to have the election of officers. | 00:01:42 | |
| And at this time, we need some recommendation emotions. | 00:01:49 | |
| I nominate Mr. Hunter for the president. | 00:01:54 | |
| All right, we got a motion for president. We need a second. | 00:01:57 | |
| Second. All right, we've got a second all in favor. | 00:02:00 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:02:03 | |
| All right, now we need somebody for Vice President. | 00:02:06 | |
| Needed somebody to. | 00:02:09 | |
| Volunteer piece. | 00:02:11 | |
| For a motion or a motion, there you go. Make somebody make a motion. That'll work. | 00:02:16 | |
| Frank, are you willing to do it? | 00:02:22 | |
| Take care. All right, so somebody needs to make a motion for Frank. | 00:02:26 | |
| I'll make a motion, Frank. | 00:02:29 | |
| For vice president. | 00:02:31 | |
| All right, we have a motion a second all any discussion? | 00:02:33 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 00:02:37 | |
| Those opposed likewise. All right. Thanks. Thanks a lot. | 00:02:39 | |
| All right. Next thing is the plant review committee. | 00:02:42 | |
| Right now I've show that's Larry. | 00:02:46 | |
| Chris Welch, Gina. | 00:02:48 | |
| John Brankworth and myself as everybody still willing to serve. | 00:02:50 | |
| I am OK Larry is John. | 00:02:54 | |
| Gina and we called Chris and I'm willing to do that. So that takes care of that, OK? | 00:02:58 | |
| All right. Next Adam is the Adam agenda item number two, FC-01. | 00:03:03 | |
| Hold on. So you guys need to vote on that. | 00:03:08 | |
| On which someone on the plant review, so I'm sorry, we need a vote on the plant review. So I need a motion to accept those 5 | 00:03:10 | |
| members. | 00:03:13 | |
| Make a motion. All right, we have a motion. I need a second. | 00:03:18 | |
| All right, all in favor signify by. | 00:03:22 | |
| Likewise opposed. Thank you all right now. | 00:03:24 | |
| All right. Now we're going to go to agenda item number 2. | 00:03:29 | |
| FC-01-25-01, Administrative Subdivision. | 00:03:32 | |
| Nick will give us his staff report. | 00:03:37 | |
| This is an. | 00:03:40 | |
| Minor subdivision application for four lot subdivision. The petitioner is ASB LLC. The zoning district is agricultural | 00:03:41 | |
| residential. | 00:03:45 | |
| They are requesting A4 lot subdivision with frontage on Nippleton Road. | 00:03:50 | |
| The property currently has a home and two barns on it. | 00:03:54 | |
| There is an identified floodway and floodway fringe on the South and. | 00:03:58 | |
| Side of the property. | 00:04:01 | |
| The plaque committee for this was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. | 00:04:03 | |
| Staff comments is that the plat as submitted does comply with lot size standards. Lots are minimum of two acres with 100 foot. | 00:04:07 | |
| Road frontage plate I submitted does comply with streets. | 00:04:15 | |
| Standards There are no new streets provided. The plat as submitted does comply with easement standards with conditions. | 00:04:19 | |
| Stated below, the driveway easements are needed. | 00:04:25 | |
| For every two lots, one driveway easement is required. | 00:04:30 | |
| Unless that requirement is waived by the. | 00:04:34 | |
| Flat as submitted does comply with the block standards. There are no blocks proposed. | 00:04:38 | |
| The plat as submitted does provide St. improvements as required. Again, no streets proposed. | 00:04:44 | |
| The plat, as submitted does comply with Water Supply Standards Board and tri-county Regional Water has provided a service letter | 00:04:51 | |
| for the new lots. | 00:04:55 | |
| 3 inch inch line is available for service. | 00:04:59 | |
| This line is not adequate to provide Fire Protection. | 00:05:02 | |
| The plot as submitted is suitable for sewage and wastewater containment because they have soil provided soil testing. | 00:05:07 | |
| And has been completed by the Floyd County Health Department. | 00:05:14 | |
| Reviewed in by the Floyd County Health Department and provided septic system requirements for suitable systems. | 00:05:19 | |
| Staff Recommendations. | 00:05:26 | |
| Would be to require joint driveways. | 00:05:28 | |
| In easements to be added to the plat for lots. | 00:05:31 | |
| I believe we said it was one and two, unless that is waived by the Planning Commission. | 00:05:37 | |
| Add note on. | 00:05:42 | |
| Flat that prior to development, the Owner shall consult with Highlander Fire Protection District. | 00:05:44 | |
| On driveway placement. | 00:05:50 | |
| All right. That's our staff reporting by having questions for Nick at this time on the board. | 00:05:53 | |
| None. All righty. Thank you, Nick. | 00:06:01 | |
| OK, at this time we'd like to call the applicant to come. | 00:06:04 | |
| Forward and presenter. | 00:06:06 | |
| Good evening. State your name and address. Yes, Sir. Brad Benson with ASB 720 Rolling Creek. | 00:06:10 | |
| Drive the Ste. 106 in New Albany. | 00:06:16 | |
| I know you all have blacks in your file there, but I've got a couple bigger ones if anyone would like. | 00:06:19 | |
| You want to walk on. | 00:06:24 | |
| Not a problem. | 00:06:25 | |
| Yes, please. | 00:06:29 | |
| So the staff report pretty much. | 00:06:41 | |
| Pretty clear on what it is. It's a 20 acre parcel located at 688. | 00:06:44 | |
| 0 Mapleton Rd. | 00:06:48 | |
| It is a R. | 00:06:50 | |
| The tracks are. | 00:06:51 | |
| For Track 1 is five acres, Track 2 is five acres, Track 3 is 2 acres. | 00:06:53 | |
| Track 3 is the one with the house on it that will remain. | 00:06:59 | |
| Track 4 is the 8 acre parcel. | 00:07:02 | |
| He's correct on the ordinance allows for. | 00:07:06 | |
| A minimum of two acre lots, so it applies with that. The road frontage is 100 square or 100 feet. | 00:07:09 | |
| So we could play with that. | 00:07:15 | |
| One element that he did say that. | 00:07:16 | |
| It does not meet. | 00:07:18 | |
| The board has. | 00:07:20 | |
| So the Commission has the ability to. | 00:07:22 | |
| Waive the right for an access easement between these lots. | 00:07:24 | |
| We would ask that that be waived for all four parcels. | 00:07:28 | |
| Track 3 already has a house on it. Our goal with this is that we're not. There's no plans for this right now. We're going to let | 00:07:33 | |
| it sit. | 00:07:36 | |
| May list it and sell it and let somebody out. | 00:07:40 | |
| Build a house on it. We are home builder so hopefully it's us. | 00:07:42 | |
| We may end up holding. | 00:07:45 | |
| Family member, but right now there's no plans. | 00:07:47 | |
| So with these big, Big Lots, we're hoping that you know you're. | 00:07:51 | |
| State style houses big, lots big. | 00:07:55 | |
| You know, big entrance in there. | 00:07:58 | |
| If the Commission were to require a. | 00:08:00 | |
| The access easement. | 00:08:03 | |
| I would ask that it only be on. | 00:08:05 | |
| Lots 1 and 2. | 00:08:07 | |
| Those are the two bigger ones on the. | 00:08:09 | |
| If you're looking at the fly on the bottom side. | 00:08:11 | |
| It's only because lot 3 already has a drive. | 00:08:14 | |
| Lot 4 would then be a separate drive as well. | 00:08:17 | |
| If that is not an option and Commission would require the. | 00:08:21 | |
| Access easements on all of them. | 00:08:26 | |
| Then I would ask that the approval tonight be conditioned upon us supplying those. | 00:08:28 | |
| I believe it's 50 feet wide along those property lines. | 00:08:33 | |
| And we'll submit that proper paperwork. | 00:08:37 | |
| For Nick for approval. | 00:08:39 | |
| So just to clarify real quick on the excess easements. | 00:08:40 | |
| Are they are they not using the road frontage to access their properties or will they need to go across the other tracks? No they | 00:08:46 | |
| will. They all have proper Rd. frontage along Naples and road. So our hope would be that we would have drives off of Napleton. | 00:08:52 | |
| That would not be able to. | 00:08:58 | |
| Access easement will not be needed. | 00:09:00 | |
| So you still got these the site provisions for one for #1 Yes, there is. So the minimum is 100 feet and. | 00:09:04 | |
| There's 100 on all. | 00:09:13 | |
| Yeah. | 00:09:18 | |
| Fall from there and Associates, 301 E Chestnut St. Court in Indiana. | 00:09:21 | |
| Your administrative subdivision requirements have have a have a requirement for joint driveways for every two lots. That's what | 00:09:24 | |
| Mr. Benson is describing. | 00:09:28 | |
| I understand the limit the need is to limit access to county roads. | 00:09:34 | |
| But when you have Big Lots like this, especially one that has an existing House of drive, it makes it difficult to Co locate those | 00:09:38 | |
| drives. | 00:09:42 | |
| And even though the ordinance requires it, it still creates a maintenance problem. | 00:09:46 | |
| Because you have two homeowners fighting over. | 00:09:49 | |
| Who's going to maintain that joint driveway? | 00:09:51 | |
| It's it's in my opinion to everyone's best interest to separate those travelers. | 00:09:53 | |
| OK. Any other questions? | 00:10:00 | |
| None. | 00:10:05 | |
| All right. At this time, we'd like to open up to anybody that like to speak in favor of this project. | 00:10:06 | |
| Come forward now. State your name and your address for the record. | 00:10:13 | |
| See that there's none stepping forward. | 00:10:19 | |
| Now we open up to those who want to oppose. Are you come in favor, Sir? | 00:10:21 | |
| OK, OK. Well. | 00:10:26 | |
| Yeah, anybody wants coming against it, coming forward. | 00:10:28 | |
| State your name and your address for the record please. | 00:10:31 | |
| James White. | 00:10:38 | |
| Everybody got that gotcha. | 00:10:39 | |
| OK, I live at 314 Tuscany Drive. | 00:10:41 | |
| And if they open all that up there and that's going to open our street up to. | 00:10:44 | |
| Them coming more traffic down through there, right? | 00:10:50 | |
| Sir, I think you're about the wrong. You're on the wrong project. Sir, this is on Napleton Road. | 00:10:53 | |
| I'm sorry. | 00:10:57 | |
| You're in the right church, Wrong Pew. | 00:10:59 | |
| All right, so. | 00:11:05 | |
| You he got a jump on you guys. | 00:11:09 | |
| All right, at this time everybody will speak in opposition. | 00:11:13 | |
| To the administrative subdivision. | 00:11:17 | |
| On naval Tarot come forward, state your name and address. | 00:11:20 | |
| Mike Gatton. I live at 6975 Napleton Rd. | 00:11:24 | |
| And my property overlooks this property. | 00:11:27 | |
| And. | 00:11:31 | |
| The traffic is already bad due to Cutter Smith woodworking. | 00:11:32 | |
| Huber's all that and to divide this out and put four more houses on there. | 00:11:36 | |
| Just opens it up for more development and. | 00:11:42 | |
| There's a second. | 00:11:44 | |
| Lot that is not involved in this to the left of it and it's going to open that up for more development. | 00:11:45 | |
| We moved out there to be in the county. I've lived there 23 years. We don't want to be in the city. | 00:11:52 | |
| The traffic, The busing. | 00:11:56 | |
| School buses, things like that. | 00:11:58 | |
| The trucks it's already bad enough we. | 00:12:01 | |
| Preferred the county to state county. | 00:12:03 | |
| That's why we're there. | 00:12:06 | |
| Thank you. | 00:12:09 | |
| Have some more time for anybody else to come forward. State your name and address for the record. | 00:12:14 | |
| And take the films. | 00:12:20 | |
| And I live at 7200 Mableton Rd. | 00:12:22 | |
| Our property also looks through. | 00:12:25 | |
| Mr. loops backyard. | 00:12:27 | |
| Over to this property. | 00:12:29 | |
| Like he said, the traffic is already so terrible. We have. | 00:12:31 | |
| Multiple wrecks with semis on. | 00:12:35 | |
| Our Rd. every year that drive off the roads hit trees. | 00:12:37 | |
| It is. | 00:12:42 | |
| So busy. | 00:12:43 | |
| Adding this is. | 00:12:44 | |
| Taking away all of our country, all of our farmland. | 00:12:46 | |
| I I had somebody build a house behind me a couple years ago and I now have no deer in my yard. I mean like there's literally no | 00:12:50 | |
| wildlife except for comedies. If anybody knows about my coyote issue, but. | 00:12:56 | |
| There is. | 00:13:01 | |
| Like nothing coming in our property more because everybody's building and scaring them out and. | 00:13:02 | |
| That's why we moved there. We moved to begin the country. We have farm animals. | 00:13:07 | |
| And dogs and. | 00:13:11 | |
| Horses and goats, and that's what we moved there for and. | 00:13:13 | |
| I mean you all all moved out there for the same reason. I know where most of you live and you move to those areas for. | 00:13:16 | |
| That in. | 00:13:22 | |
| You're turning it around. There's another piece of land. | 00:13:23 | |
| I know the same person bought on Ableton road and if you all approve this. | 00:13:26 | |
| It's just gonna turn around and get approved for him as well, and that's. | 00:13:30 | |
| Down by the cows. | 00:13:33 | |
| So like, that's our landmarks. We turn at the cows you go to. | 00:13:35 | |
| This farm and that farm and you're just turning it away. | 00:13:39 | |
| Everybody asked me every day. | 00:13:43 | |
| Do you know anybody that has 5 acres for sale? | 00:13:44 | |
| No, because somebody buys it and puts a whole bunch of houses on it. | 00:13:47 | |
| That's not what we want. | 00:13:51 | |
| So just consider that. | 00:13:52 | |
| Thank you. | 00:13:54 | |
| Good evening, Troy Durham. | 00:14:03 | |
| 7222 Napleton Rd. | 00:14:05 | |
| I'm also as a crow flies less than a mile from this development potential development. | 00:14:07 | |
| I don't chagrin anybody for China. | 00:14:12 | |
| Exercise their free enterprise and do business as they see fit. They have the freedom to do it. | 00:14:14 | |
| My two cents as much like these other people who spoke. | 00:14:20 | |
| It's too crowded on the road. It's too busy. | 00:14:24 | |
| And uh, uh. | 00:14:26 | |
| To be frank. | 00:14:28 | |
| I don't like the discomfort I already have fearing for my. | 00:14:29 | |
| Home and those within it from vehicle. | 00:14:33 | |
| Thanks. We've had semis in our front yard. | 00:14:36 | |
| In the past. | 00:14:38 | |
| And I just think it's too much on the road. | 00:14:41 | |
| Too much development. | 00:14:43 | |
| This would maybe be a domino. | 00:14:44 | |
| Of continuing the domino effect of what's already happened with the. | 00:14:46 | |
| Development further out to the county. | 00:14:50 | |
| I don't wish to see it. | 00:14:52 | |
| For my $0.02. | 00:14:54 | |
| And where I lived. | 00:14:56 | |
| And chose to live. | 00:14:57 | |
| For rural reasons. | 00:14:59 | |
| There's something. | 00:15:00 | |
| Alluring to being out in the country. | 00:15:01 | |
| And I think that would be spoiled. | 00:15:03 | |
| Thank you very much. Thank you. | 00:15:05 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:15:08 | |
| All right, at this time we get. | 00:15:12 | |
| Nobody else in opposition. We open the floor back to the petitioner to rebut. | 00:15:15 | |
| Anything that was discussed. | 00:15:19 | |
| Thank you. I'll make it short here. The only thing I would like to point out is we are this is administrative flat. | 00:15:23 | |
| We comply with the ordinance. The only issue would be the access easement. | 00:15:29 | |
| I said I would ask that you waive that right here because of what we're trying to do with this. | 00:15:34 | |
| We are not looking to divide this property. It is an AR which is a. | 00:15:39 | |
| Two acre lot minimum. | 00:15:42 | |
| So hypothetically we get coming forth with a plat for 9 acres in that zone. | 00:15:44 | |
| We're not looking to do that. | 00:15:49 | |
| Worth looking just for four. | 00:15:50 | |
| They're Big Lots, A2 acre. The smallest one is one with the house on it. They'll remain. | 00:15:52 | |
| And then the 55 naked SO. | 00:15:57 | |
| All right. Thank you. | 00:15:59 | |
| At this point where we looking for a ballot? | 00:16:03 | |
| I have a ballot. | 00:16:07 | |
| Subdivision named Ableton Place DACA. | 00:16:08 | |
| FC 01/25/01. | 00:16:11 | |
| After careful review, the fact committee finds that one. | 00:16:15 | |
| Plant as submitted does comply with the lot size standards. | 00:16:18 | |
| Because the new lights are all a minimum of two acres with more than 100. | 00:16:22 | |
| Foot of Rd. frontage #2. | 00:16:26 | |
| The plan has submitted does comply with the street design standards. | 00:16:29 | |
| Because no streets, no new streets are proposed. | 00:16:33 | |
| #3. | 00:16:36 | |
| The plan has submitted does comply with the easement standards because with the conditions below, driveway easements. | 00:16:37 | |
| Or required. | 00:16:43 | |
| #4 the plat as submitted does comply with the block standards. | 00:16:45 | |
| Because there are no blocks required or proposed. | 00:16:48 | |
| #5 the plat as submitted does. | 00:16:52 | |
| Provide St. and. | 00:16:55 | |
| Improvements as required by the ordinance. There are no new streets provided. | 00:16:56 | |
| Number six, the Plat as submitted does comply with the water supply standards because. | 00:17:01 | |
| Board and Tri Water Regional. | 00:17:06 | |
| Water has provided a service letter for the new. | 00:17:09 | |
| Lots. A three inch line is available for service. Note this line is not adequate for bad Fire Protection. | 00:17:13 | |
| #7 the plat as submitted is suitable. | 00:17:19 | |
| Pursuage and wastewater contain. | 00:17:21 | |
| Containment because soil testing has been completed. | 00:17:24 | |
| And Floyd County Health Department has provided septic system requirements for suitable systems. | 00:17:27 | |
| The plant is accepted upon completion of the following condition at a joint driveway and easement to the plat for Lots 1 and 2. | 00:17:33 | |
| Adding note to the plat. | 00:17:40 | |
| That states the following. Prior to development, the owners shall consult the Highlander Fire Protection District for Fire | 00:17:41 | |
| Protection requirements. | 00:17:45 | |
| Due to the lack of adequate water supply. | 00:17:48 | |
| Decision the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants the. | 00:17:51 | |
| Primary approval. | 00:17:55 | |
| For this administrative subdivision at the meeting held on the 10th of February, 2025. | 00:17:56 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 00:18:02 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. We're looking for a second. | 00:18:04 | |
| I'll second. We have a second. | 00:18:09 | |
| All in favor signify any discussion. Any discussion. | 00:18:11 | |
| Any discussion? | 00:18:15 | |
| All in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:18:17 | |
| It passes. Thank you. | 00:18:22 | |
| Did they sign down? | 00:18:31 | |
| OK, at this time we like to move to Well, first of all, we want to ask the petitioner. | 00:18:34 | |
| If they're OK with us putting. | 00:18:40 | |
| Agenda items 3 through 6 and hearing them at the same time. | 00:18:43 | |
| Mr. Craft, you OK with that? | 00:18:47 | |
| All right. | 00:18:50 | |
| Yes, separate ballots on everyone. Yes, Sir. | 00:18:52 | |
| OK. OK. At this time, we'd like to ask Nick Creeby. | 00:18:55 | |
| I'm a non voting member but I'll be recused recusing myself for the rest of the meeting. All right, thank you. | 00:19:00 | |
| At this time, they could give a staff report. | 00:19:09 | |
| So this is for docket items number FCO 1/25/02. | 00:19:13 | |
| CO125. | 00:19:18 | |
| Three FC 24. | 00:19:20 | |
| 504. | 00:19:23 | |
| In FC. | 00:19:27 | |
| 1/25/05. | 00:19:31 | |
| Petitioner Here's the Thing Group LLC. The location is 5031 through 5053 Old Vincent's Road. | 00:19:38 | |
| The requests are for a zoning map amendment. | 00:19:45 | |
| A major subdivision. | 00:19:50 | |
| A PUD map amendment. | 00:19:53 | |
| In detailed development. | 00:19:56 | |
| They are all pertaining to the same project. | 00:19:59 | |
| The current zoning is for general commercial. | 00:20:03 | |
| Underlying zoning request is for multi family and then a multi family PUD. | 00:20:07 | |
| The petitioner is seeking a planned unit development for mixed-use, multi family residential and commercial use. | 00:20:13 | |
| This proposal will consolidate 4 parcels into two building lots, 3 points 64 and 2.334 acres. | 00:20:19 | |
| The lots will be separated by through St. known as Knobs Landing Blvd. | 00:20:28 | |
| Connecting Tuscany Drive in Trevor Rd. | 00:20:33 | |
| Lot 1 will front will Vincennes Road and is the larger lot and will include two building. | 00:20:36 | |
| Two buildings, A mixed-use commercial multifamily building. Building 1. | 00:20:42 | |
| In a separate standalone commercial. | 00:20:46 | |
| Retail building with drive through. | 00:20:49 | |
| Which is proposed bank building 3 threes. | 00:20:51 | |
| Lot 2 will have a single multi family building. | 00:20:54 | |
| In a building 2. | 00:20:58 | |
| Building 1 at the north of the property in the fronting Old Vincennes Rd. | 00:21:00 | |
| Will be a three story structure with the ground floor area of 25,092 square feet. | 00:21:05 | |
| The building will include 7717 square foot of commercial retail space. | 00:21:11 | |
| Clubhouse leasing office. | 00:21:17 | |
| And 59 multifamily units, 21 of those will be two-bedroom, 38 one bedroom. | 00:21:19 | |
| Building 3 at the east side of the property will be near the corner of Shriver and Old Vincent's. | 00:21:26 | |
| It will be a thirty 3600 square foot retail building with drive through that is the proposed bank. | 00:21:31 | |
| Building 2, located at the South of the property on Lot 2, will be a three story multi family structure with ground floor area of | 00:21:40 | |
| 23,679 square feet and 66 units. | 00:21:46 | |
| The property will also have. | 00:21:52 | |
| Pool and outdoor recreation games area. | 00:21:54 | |
| Neat foot masonry wall. | 00:21:57 | |
| We'll buffer the residents on the West side of the development. | 00:22:00 | |
| Villas of Floyd's knives. | 00:22:03 | |
| Adjoining properties to the West. | 00:22:05 | |
| Is the residential urban zone subdivision buildings of Floyd's Knobs to northwest across Tuscany. Dr. is a vacant general | 00:22:07 | |
| commercial property. | 00:22:12 | |
| Across Old Vincennes Road to the north is undeveloped general commercial. | 00:22:16 | |
| To the northeast is Highlander Point development. | 00:22:20 | |
| General commercial zoned. | 00:22:23 | |
| The East Across River Rd. is general commercial. | 00:22:26 | |
| To the South is residentially urban zone property with two acre single family lot. | 00:22:29 | |
| In small section of the Highland subdivision. | 00:22:34 | |
| Which is residential urban. | 00:22:37 | |
| The current base zone for the proposal is general commercial. | 00:22:39 | |
| Commercial. | 00:22:43 | |
| Part of Floyd County Zoning Ordinance Section 7.04 GA Base Commercial Zone may not designate more than 30% of the proposed | 00:22:44 | |
| development per square footage for residential. | 00:22:49 | |
| Therefore the applicant is requesting the base zone be changed to multi family. | 00:22:55 | |
| A traffic impact study was conducted for the proposal and determined that the intersections impacted by the development. | 00:23:01 | |
| Will continue to work at an acceptable level of service. | 00:23:07 | |
| Technical Review Committee was held on December 18th, 2024 for this development. | 00:23:17 | |
| Summary report was attached to your staff report. | 00:23:23 | |
| The technical review committee provides. | 00:23:27 | |
| Recommendations to the Planning Commission. | 00:23:30 | |
| On that. | 00:23:33 | |
| Are the utility providers. | 00:23:34 | |
| Public Safety. Sheriff Fire. | 00:23:37 | |
| School. | 00:23:40 | |
| As well as county staff, storm water engineering and planning. | 00:23:42 | |
| The reason? Staff finds that the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:23:47 | |
| Because the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan identifies the area as a commercial growth area. | 00:23:54 | |
| Proposed. | 00:23:59 | |
| The mixed-use featuring a commercial element yours to the frontage. | 00:24:00 | |
| Additionally, rezoning is consistent with smart growth principles identified in the plan. Specifically mixed land uses compact | 00:24:04 | |
| building design. | 00:24:08 | |
| Creating a range of housing opportunities, directing development towards existing communities and preferring. | 00:24:12 | |
| And thus preserving open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas. | 00:24:18 | |
| As this is an infill development. | 00:24:23 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the. | 00:24:27 | |
| Conditions of the character of the current structures in the. | 00:24:30 | |
| And uses in the area. | 00:24:34 | |
| Because the commercial use is in the front of the lot are consistent with the original general commercial zoning. | 00:24:36 | |
| The multifamily uses our appropriate transitional uses between general commercial and urban residential uses. | 00:24:42 | |
| Voting facade materials are brick and Hardy board. | 00:24:48 | |
| The structures are within the height limits of the zoning ordinance. And there are. | 00:24:52 | |
| There is another three story building in the vicinity that is the Chase Bank. | 00:24:56 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of. | 00:25:01 | |
| The land because. | 00:25:06 | |
| The rezoning follows smart growth principles already noted. | 00:25:08 | |
| It has also provided. | 00:25:12 | |
| Additional housing identified as needed in the Purdue Housing Report the county had completed in 2020. | 00:25:14 | |
| It is mixed-use infill in commercial growth area. | 00:25:20 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be interest to the values of other properties in the area because. | 00:25:24 | |
| Commercial uses are consistent with the neighborhood commercial zoning. | 00:25:30 | |
| Excuse me? | 00:25:34 | |
| The general commercial zoning. | 00:25:35 | |
| Inappropriate adjacent and residential urban zoning. | 00:25:38 | |
| And uses the addition of the multifamily component. | 00:25:41 | |
| Will support local business customer base. The development will increase the value of the lots itself and expected that positive | 00:25:44 | |
| impacts on neighboring commercial lots. | 00:25:48 | |
| Buffer yard. | 00:25:53 | |
| Along adjacent residential lots is provided on the West. Additional buffering is recommended for the properties on the South. | 00:25:54 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development in the area. | 00:26:03 | |
| Because rezoning follows the objectives of small smart growth outlined in the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:26:08 | |
| Higher development is directed towards existing infrastructure. | 00:26:15 | |
| Provider letters indicate ability to serve and the development is identified. Commercial growth area. | 00:26:18 | |
| It is an infill development staff has favorable recommendations for the reason. | 00:26:24 | |
| Written commitments recommended would be buffer yard 2 standards met. | 00:26:30 | |
| For all adjoining residents. | 00:26:34 | |
| Drainage will meet Floyd County stormwater standards as approved by the Stormwater Board. | 00:26:37 | |
| And if phased, lot 1 will be developed first in a schedule for completion of the project will be provided. | 00:26:43 | |
| Onto the subdivision application. | 00:26:51 | |
| I will not repeat the. | 00:26:54 | |
| Outline of the. | 00:26:58 | |
| Project. | 00:26:59 | |
| On staff review, the Petitioner has provided compliant preliminary plan for the project, including preliminary plat. Petitioner | 00:27:01 | |
| has provided certification that all drainage and environmental requirements will be complied with and that there are no known | 00:27:06 | |
| outstanding issues concerning IDAM. | 00:27:11 | |
| Geotechnical report is not required for the property and staff. The traffic study has been completed by strained associates. | 00:27:17 | |
| In the phase one environmental is not required. | 00:27:25 | |
| Lots meet the size and frontage standards of the zoning ordinance. | 00:27:28 | |
| General, commercial and multifamily districts. | 00:27:31 | |
| Knobs Landing Blvd. is proposed as a through St. between Tuscany and Schreiber Rd. Dimensions and layout. | 00:27:35 | |
| Subdivision control ordinance requirements. | 00:27:43 | |
| Multiple entrances from Schreiber Rd. Knobs Landing Blvd. in Tuscany Dr. is provided. | 00:27:46 | |
| Sidewalks are provided. | 00:27:52 | |
| Certification to meet county drainage and stormwater standards have been provided final approval of the drainage plan. | 00:27:54 | |
| Will be required prior to secondary approval. | 00:28:01 | |
| The petitioner has provided willingness to serve. Letters from Floyd Knobs Water, Georgetown. | 00:28:05 | |
| Township Fire Protection District, Harrison RC, New Albany Wastewater Charter and AT&T. | 00:28:09 | |
| The wastewater will be provided by New Albany Storm Water. | 00:28:16 | |
| Our wastewater is not. | 00:28:19 | |
| Staff recommendations are just that, the. | 00:28:21 | |
| Final approval of drains stormwater plans be required prior to secondary improvement. | 00:28:24 | |
| For the PUD application. | 00:28:30 | |
| I'll go over the PUD process. | 00:28:32 | |
| So part. | 00:28:34 | |
| Planned unit development is a design special district that can be pursued by an applicant. The purpose of the planned unit | 00:28:36 | |
| development is to courage the flexibility to develop or redevelop land in an effort to promote appropriate uses. | 00:28:42 | |
| Maintain unique character features such as natural or historic resources. | 00:28:49 | |
| Promote innovative design concepts. | 00:28:53 | |
| It is also designed to facilitate the economies of scale in relationship to infrastructure, public services, encouraging field | 00:28:56 | |
| development. | 00:28:59 | |
| PUD process. | 00:29:03 | |
| Petitioner meets with staff. | 00:29:05 | |
| For a conceptual step. | 00:29:07 | |
| Sketch playing and playing conference, which they did on. | 00:29:09 | |
| October 23rd, 2024. | 00:29:13 | |
| Petitioner then submits a detailed development plan for review. | 00:29:16 | |
| And submits a PUD application for Employment Commission. | 00:29:19 | |
| The Plan Commission can then. | 00:29:23 | |
| Provide umm. | 00:29:25 | |
| A recommendation to the county commissioners. | 00:29:26 | |
| In a favor favorable recommendation. | 00:29:29 | |
| An unfavorable recommendation or no recommendation? | 00:29:32 | |
| The county commissioners will then review the rezoning petition within 90 days and may approve or disapprove the request. Upon | 00:29:36 | |
| approval, the property is officially resumed. | 00:29:41 | |
| The PUD will then return to the Planning Commission for secondary approval. | 00:29:46 | |
| Of the detailed development plan. | 00:29:50 | |
| No additional public hearing will be required. | 00:29:52 | |
| Safra views of the pod. | 00:29:56 | |
| But very significantly from the zoning. | 00:29:58 | |
| In subdivision control ordinances in a few areas. | 00:30:01 | |
| 1st. | 00:30:08 | |
| It is unclear the minimum. | 00:30:09 | |
| Unit size of the units. | 00:30:10 | |
| We have an 800 square foot. | 00:30:13 | |
| Minimum. So I would just like. | 00:30:15 | |
| The applicant provide that information. | 00:30:17 | |
| Density. They're requesting approximately 20.9 dwellings per acre. | 00:30:20 | |
| Our multi family standard is. | 00:30:25 | |
| Currently 8 is the allowed maximum. | 00:30:28 | |
| We do have several developments in the county. | 00:30:31 | |
| That have. | 00:30:34 | |
| 19 to 20, that's not built. | 00:30:35 | |
| And Gateway villages has about 15. | 00:30:39 | |
| Dwelling units breaker. | 00:30:41 | |
| Parking 2 1/2 spaces are required per dwelling unit. | 00:30:44 | |
| They have provided 1.8 for lot 1 and 1.92 for lot 2. | 00:30:48 | |
| And then the buffer yard. | 00:30:55 | |
| South side of the property. | 00:30:56 | |
| Would require. | 00:30:59 | |
| Buffer Yard 2 standards. | 00:31:00 | |
| The proposed land in the in. | 00:31:03 | |
| Land uses in the PUD are. | 00:31:06 | |
| Are not in conflict with the spirit and intent. | 00:31:08 | |
| Of the comprehensive plan, surrounding land uses and zoning districts. | 00:31:11 | |
| The comprehensive plan. | 00:31:16 | |
| It shows that the area is a commercial growth area. High density should be directed towards adequate infrastructure and public | 00:31:18 | |
| services. | 00:31:21 | |
| Proposal can be served by all utility providers without expansion. | 00:31:24 | |
| In multi family style density should consider mixed land uses which is studs. | 00:31:29 | |
| Zoning and surrounding land uses. The proposal is currently in the general commercial district with residential urban. | 00:31:34 | |
| General commercial adjacent. | 00:31:40 | |
| The proposed blood does provide adequate public service, light, air traffic control, open and more common. | 00:31:43 | |
| Space and recreation. | 00:31:49 | |
| The proposal does include adequate services, as evidenced. | 00:31:52 | |
| Service provider letters. | 00:31:55 | |
| Proposal includes reasonable traffic circulation plan. | 00:31:58 | |
| Traffic impact study has been conducted. | 00:32:01 | |
| And the proposal provides recreational space in the form of a pool and outdoor games area. There's also green space within the | 00:32:04 | |
| development. | 00:32:07 | |
| The proposed PUD is compatible with adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. | 00:32:12 | |
| Commercial use is consistent with general commercial uses in the Highlander point in the zoning of adjacent properties, | 00:32:17 | |
| multifamily residential. | 00:32:21 | |
| Is appropriate with mixed uses and should be buffered from adjacent. | 00:32:24 | |
| Residential uses. | 00:32:29 | |
| The proposed BUD will not interfere with the use or diminish the value of adjacent properties. | 00:32:31 | |
| In surrounding neighborhood. | 00:32:35 | |
| Improvements on the land are expected to have positive impacts on neighboring property values. | 00:32:37 | |
| Mixed retail, commercial and multi family will not diminish the use of neighborhood properties with adequate public services | 00:32:42 | |
| provided. | 00:32:46 | |
| Appropriate offering is required to adjourn. | 00:32:50 | |
| Residential properties. | 00:32:53 | |
| HUD will not diminish the level of service for roadway systems in the vicinity. | 00:32:55 | |
| As the traffic impact study. | 00:33:00 | |
| Concluded. | 00:33:03 | |
| The proposed PUD can be immediately and adequately served by the existing public facilities and services. | 00:33:05 | |
| As evidenced by the. | 00:33:11 | |
| Service letters. | 00:33:13 | |
| The proposed POD does preserve natural and historic. | 00:33:15 | |
| Resources to every extent possible. The existing cycles of single family structure used as a commercial office. | 00:33:18 | |
| The site will be cleared and new plantings consistent with the zoning ordinance Landscaping will be installed. | 00:33:24 | |
| There are no known historic resources on the site. | 00:33:30 | |
| Proposed PUD will not be interest to the health, safety and general welfare. The proposed plot is consistent with planning | 00:33:35 | |
| documents for this area. Adequate public infrastructure is available. | 00:33:40 | |
| For the development as our public services. | 00:33:46 | |
| Drainage will be approved by County Stormwater consistent with their requirements. Staff recommendations are favorable | 00:33:49 | |
| recommendation with the following commitments and conditions. | 00:33:53 | |
| Written commitments will be phased. Phase one will be Lot 1 funding or Vincents Road and the schedule for completion of all phases | 00:33:59 | |
| will be provided. | 00:34:03 | |
| To the Planning Commission. | 00:34:07 | |
| Prior to secondary approval. | 00:34:08 | |
| Provide additional screening of dumpster on lot 1 between dumpster and roadway. | 00:34:11 | |
| Provide light at entrance locations where there are none and meet Buffer Yard 2 standards for adjoining residential use to the | 00:34:16 | |
| South. | 00:34:20 | |
| That is the staff report for these 4. | 00:34:24 | |
| Applications. | 00:34:27 | |
| All righty. Thanks, Nick. Any any questions on the board? | 00:34:30 | |
| You have a question. | 00:34:34 | |
| Nick, you indicated. | 00:34:36 | |
| There that strange associates conducted a traffic study for the project and then an acceptable. | 00:34:37 | |
| Loss or level of service was was found. Those law studies typically indicate like a grade between A and F Do you have any idea | 00:34:42 | |
| what the grade was for the particular project? | 00:34:47 | |
| B i.e. and beyond. | 00:34:53 | |
| The the level of service indicated. | 00:34:57 | |
| Which is. | 00:35:01 | |
| Deemed acceptable as the current level of service. | 00:35:03 | |
| So any other? | 00:35:09 | |
| Any other questions? | 00:35:11 | |
| For Nick. | 00:35:14 | |
| And they if. | 00:35:16 | |
| We had a TRC on this right, a technical review committee. | 00:35:17 | |
| Can we explain just a little bit to the board? | 00:35:20 | |
| What came out of that meeting? What's the purpose of that meeting? Yes, the tier the plans provided to the TRC were. | 00:35:24 | |
| A little bit different than what we finally have here. | 00:35:30 | |
| The alignment of the site had the bank on the opposite side on Tuscany Drive. | 00:35:34 | |
| Dumpster was located closer to the roadway on Knox Landing or Knox Landing Blvd. | 00:35:42 | |
| There were more multifamily units. | 00:35:48 | |
| So the parking. | 00:35:51 | |
| Ratios were. | 00:35:53 | |
| Less. | 00:35:55 | |
| And there was number buffer yard. | 00:35:59 | |
| For the residential. | 00:36:00 | |
| Properties to the West. So they didn't make all those modifications for this final application, OK. | 00:36:02 | |
| All righty. | 00:36:11 | |
| So they've already adjusted. | 00:36:14 | |
| The original application, is that correct? | 00:36:16 | |
| At the TRC. | 00:36:19 | |
| Thank you. | 00:36:21 | |
| Are any other questions for Nick? | 00:36:22 | |
| OK. At this point, let me go through just a little bit of a housekeeping here. | 00:36:24 | |
| Because of the sensitivity of this project and the number of. | 00:36:29 | |
| Agenda items we have. | 00:36:34 | |
| We're going to increase the time that we allow. | 00:36:36 | |
| For the applicant to present his. | 00:36:38 | |
| Project and then we're going to double the times. | 00:36:43 | |
| That we have for people to speak in favor, to speak in opposition, and then we will then give the applicant 5 minutes to rebut | 00:36:46 | |
| anything that was so said. So just let the board know that that's what we're going to do because of the. | 00:36:52 | |
| The sensitivity of this project so. | 00:36:58 | |
| If the applicant would like to come forward, state his name and address. | 00:37:01 | |
| We appreciate it. | 00:37:05 | |
| For the record, John Craft with the law firm of Young Lind Anderson Kraft, 126 W Spring Street in New Albany. | 00:37:14 | |
| Appearing on behalf of the applicant. | 00:37:21 | |
| Along with the engineer which would be Jason Copper White with Paul Primavera and Associates. | 00:37:23 | |
| Jackson Theneman is with me as well from Phenomenon. | 00:37:28 | |
| Group LLC. | 00:37:32 | |
| And then likewise Daniel Moriarty. | 00:37:34 | |
| Who has designed the? | 00:37:36 | |
| Project from the standpoint of the architectural piece of that. | 00:37:38 | |
| So ultimately. | 00:37:42 | |
| Four of us will present. | 00:37:44 | |
| I'll cover first of all, as indicated, there are four items before you this evening. | 00:37:47 | |
| Two of which are rezoning. | 00:37:51 | |
| Which means ultimately, those two rezoning issues come to you for a recommendation. | 00:37:53 | |
| Not an approval tonight, but merely. | 00:37:59 | |
| A request as it relates to those zoning requirements. | 00:38:02 | |
| Going forward to the county commissioners with a favorable. | 00:38:06 | |
| And unfavorable or no recommendation at all. | 00:38:09 | |
| Under those two elements, and again, we'll talk a little bit about each one, but under each of those elements. | 00:38:13 | |
| You have to pay due consideration and these are the same considerations the commissioners will look at in order to make a | 00:38:20 | |
| determination. | 00:38:23 | |
| On the passage of these two ordinances. | 00:38:27 | |
| Primarily, Indiana Code 3674603 covers those five elements. | 00:38:30 | |
| Those five elements deal with the Comprehensive Plan and. | 00:38:35 | |
| You'll hear on a. | 00:38:38 | |
| PowerPoint, you'll hear Mr. Copper Weight go through those issues with regards to compliance with the current comprehensive plan. | 00:38:41 | |
| Current conditions and character of current structures and uses in each district. | 00:38:48 | |
| The most desirable use for which land in each district is adapted. | 00:38:53 | |
| Conservation of property values throughout the jurisdiction. | 00:38:57 | |
| And responsible development and growth. | 00:39:01 | |
| You've probably heard a number of items covered by Mr. Creepy when he spoke. | 00:39:03 | |
| Pertaining to the staff report. | 00:39:07 | |
| And this is a growth area in the county? | 00:39:09 | |
| Certainly, again, Mr. Copper weight will cover that more fully. | 00:39:12 | |
| The piece as it relates to. | 00:39:16 | |
| The change from GC, which if you look at the current zoning ordinance in Floyd County, there are 91. | 00:39:18 | |
| Uses that could be put there as a matter of right. | 00:39:27 | |
| Including, uh. | 00:39:30 | |
| Big box commercial. | 00:39:31 | |
| Including smaller units, but it is a GC in their actual 91 uses that could be put there as a matter of right. | 00:39:32 | |
| One of the things that you'll hear this evening is when Mr. Feenman looked at this project. | 00:39:40 | |
| He looked at it from the standpoint of dealing with. | 00:39:45 | |
| Walkability. | 00:39:49 | |
| Specifically, individuals as well as commercial uses don't want to go in an area now just where they're putting a commercial use. | 00:39:51 | |
| They want the possibility of residents that can use that commercial area and also look at the possibility of walking to and from | 00:39:58 | |
| their residence to those commercial uses. | 00:40:04 | |
| When we look at the issue from a GC to the MF. | 00:40:10 | |
| The multifamily. | 00:40:14 | |
| Under the terms of a normal change of zoning. | 00:40:16 | |
| When taking it to an MF that would allow any type of. | 00:40:19 | |
| Multifamily use on this property. | 00:40:23 | |
| Provided it meets the development standards of the multifamily. | 00:40:26 | |
| But the other piece of the rezoning request this evening? | 00:40:29 | |
| Is taking that multifamily to a PUD. | 00:40:33 | |
| And the purpose of a PUD first and foremost is to deal with mixed uses. | 00:40:36 | |
| On a given property. | 00:40:41 | |
| But most importantly to you as well as the county commissioners as well as the community. | 00:40:43 | |
| When you take a. | 00:40:48 | |
| Change to an MF that allows, as long as it meets the requirements, to go as deep and as dense as you desire to do on this 6 plus | 00:40:50 | |
| acres. | 00:40:54 | |
| But with the change to a planned unit development district. | 00:40:59 | |
| What it requires, and you heard Mr. Creevy, again go through the process because the process is one of those that if both zoning | 00:41:04 | |
| changes are forwarded to the commissioners with favorable recommendations and again the commissioners passed those. | 00:41:11 | |
| That ultimately. | 00:41:19 | |
| The PUD must then return to you as the Plan Commission for secondary review. | 00:41:20 | |
| So it's not a matter that we're getting a blank check. | 00:41:26 | |
| For a change to multifamily and do what we desire to do. | 00:41:29 | |
| The project itself. And that's the 4th element you'll see this evening. | 00:41:33 | |
| Is the development plan. | 00:41:37 | |
| But under the terms of a planned unit development district. | 00:41:39 | |
| It is established by way of ordinance. So ultimately. | 00:41:42 | |
| Commissioners pass that ordinance. | 00:41:45 | |
| They will then adopt specific. | 00:41:48 | |
| Definitions of what you may do. | 00:41:50 | |
| Much again as indicated. | 00:41:53 | |
| We went to the. | 00:41:55 | |
| Technical Review Committee on December 18th and walk through this project in order to make certain that what we would do and what | 00:41:57 | |
| the development plan would cover would be in order that we can move forward with it. | 00:42:03 | |
| So it's not a matter that by granting an MF. | 00:42:08 | |
| In that instance, it's a matter of granting an MF with a planned unit development district. | 00:42:12 | |
| It will then designate exactly what can be put on that parcel. | 00:42:17 | |
| That will then be brought back to you as the Plan Commission for secondary review. | 00:42:21 | |
| Once that secondary review is granted. | 00:42:26 | |
| Then from that standpoint, what you end up with is a situation of having to abide. | 00:42:30 | |
| By that plan that you see in front of you. | 00:42:36 | |
| If that is the secondary approval plan. | 00:42:39 | |
| And as a result of that, it allows you as well as the commissioners the ability. | 00:42:41 | |
| To determine what planned documentation. | 00:42:47 | |
| And you heard Mr. Creedy's report, some of those elements of what needs to be provided. | 00:42:50 | |
| In order to move this forward. | 00:42:55 | |
| Provided. | 00:42:57 | |
| It changes from MF. | 00:42:58 | |
| To the PUD. | 00:43:00 | |
| Those two come together. | 00:43:02 | |
| And again, those would be adopted by way of an ordinance by the county commissioners. | 00:43:03 | |
| The other two pieces of it. | 00:43:08 | |
| Provided. | 00:43:10 | |
| Those two zoning changes come forward. Those other two pieces then become ministerial in nature. | 00:43:12 | |
| And that is the subdivision. | 00:43:19 | |
| And as long as the subdivision meets the requirements of the subdivision control ordinance. And again when listening to the report | 00:43:21 | |
| of Mr. Privy, and I'm sure you've read it. | 00:43:26 | |
| Specifically, uh. | 00:43:31 | |
| We meet those requirements if in fact those two zoning changes come about. | 00:43:32 | |
| The other piece of it. | 00:43:37 | |
| Would be the development. | 00:43:39 | |
| And once again, provided that development plan meets all of the elements as to setbacks and otherwise for this zoning district. | 00:43:40 | |
| With the planned unit development district. | 00:43:48 | |
| Then likewise, that is a ministerial action as well. | 00:43:51 | |
| We're here this evening asking specifically that these 4 dockets. | 00:43:55 | |
| Be approved. | 00:43:59 | |
| Two of which were asking for favorable recommendation. | 00:44:00 | |
| To the county commissioners. | 00:44:04 | |
| Certainly your recommendation is what the county commissioners are going to listen to. | 00:44:05 | |
| The county commissioners do not have to follow your recommendation. | 00:44:10 | |
| But certainly from the standpoint it in my experience over 40 plus years. | 00:44:14 | |
| Most times and most often, they will follow that recommendation. So we're here this evening asking for favorable recommendation | 00:44:19 | |
| on. | 00:44:23 | |
| The zoning change from. | 00:44:27 | |
| Our two MF from. | 00:44:30 | |
| The GC as well as asking that MF be limited by way of a PUD. | 00:44:33 | |
| And ask that that likewise be forwarded. | 00:44:39 | |
| With a favorable recommendation. | 00:44:42 | |
| I'm gonna call on. | 00:44:44 | |
| Jason to go through the elements with regards to the plan itself and touch on those elements under the comprehensive plan you | 00:44:46 | |
| should have in front of you. If not, it'll be on the screen a power. | 00:44:51 | |
| PowerPoint presentation regarding that. Thank you. | 00:44:57 | |
| All right. Thank you. How are we doing on time? | 00:45:01 | |
| How much? | 00:45:08 | |
| Two, he had 20. He had total 20 minutes. | 00:45:09 | |
| 12. | 00:45:13 | |
| He got 1212 minutes. I'll try to be quick. | 00:45:15 | |
| There you go. | 00:45:18 | |
| Good evening, Jason Copper. Wait again with Paul from Avera and Associates. | 00:45:19 | |
| I'll try not to repeat anything. | 00:45:22 | |
| Mr. Creeby said, or Mr. Kraft said, though there are probably slides that you repeat that information. | 00:45:24 | |
| I'll try to gloss over those if I can. | 00:45:28 | |
| Again, this is knobs landing mixed-use development. | 00:45:30 | |
| Located at 5031 through 50. | 00:45:33 | |
| 53 Old Vincennes Rd. | 00:45:35 | |
| The next slide, that's the aerial of the site. | 00:45:38 | |
| I don't know that anyone's actually showing you that when they were talking, but it's the southwest quadrant of the intersection | 00:45:41 | |
| of Shriver Rd. | 00:45:43 | |
| And open sense you can see to the West as villas of Floyd Knobs. | 00:45:46 | |
| To the South as a single family residence and the Highlands that's still developing NE is Highlander Point. | 00:45:50 | |
| Just to the east of this Planning Commission may remember. | 00:45:56 | |
| You've approved a bank development plan at that site. | 00:45:59 | |
| Don't know when that will be developed, but it's coming. | 00:46:02 | |
| This is the zoning map for the area. The red is general commercial GC. | 00:46:04 | |
| The orange is residential urban. | 00:46:08 | |
| Are you? | 00:46:10 | |
| These are the four applications that have been talked about already. | 00:46:12 | |
| This is an artist rendering that Mister Moriarty prepared for the site. | 00:46:17 | |
| You can see. | 00:46:21 | |
| Prize and help you, but there are two buildings on the north lot. | 00:46:23 | |
| One building on the South with some amenities together on the north lot. | 00:46:26 | |
| This is the. | 00:46:31 | |
| My engineering version of his color rendering which shows a little bit more detail. It has turned 90°. Apologize for that. | 00:46:32 | |
| But again, it's just a little bit more detailed. | 00:46:40 | |
| So it is 6.4 acres. It will be. | 00:46:43 | |
| The plan is to divide it into two lots. | 00:46:46 | |
| Mr. Creepy went through the particulars. Just to highlight those, Building 1 is 7717 square foot of ground floor retail. | 00:46:49 | |
| With a leasing office, clubhouse. | 00:46:57 | |
| 59 multifamily dwelling units, 21 of which are two-bedroom, 38 of which are one bedroom. | 00:46:58 | |
| Google and other outdoor amenities are proposed there. | 00:47:03 | |
| Building 2 is 66 multifamily dwelling units, 24 two-bedroom and 42 one bedroom. This that's on the South lot and building 3 is a | 00:47:06 | |
| 3600 square foot. | 00:47:11 | |
| Bank Retail. | 00:47:15 | |
| With a drive through. | 00:47:17 | |
| These are the zoning. | 00:47:20 | |
| Change characteristics that Mister Kraft talked about earlier. | 00:47:22 | |
| So I took excerpts from your comprehensive plan that I that I felt showed that this site. | 00:47:28 | |
| Met the requirements. | 00:47:33 | |
| As Mr. Creeby said, smart growth, it's kind of buzzword throughout your comprehensive plan. | 00:47:35 | |
| Smart Growth is a planning theory designed toward the efficient use of land, resources and existing urban infrastructure. | 00:47:40 | |
| And your in your comp plan list. | 00:47:45 | |
| 10 smart growth principles, of which we probably meet 8. | 00:47:48 | |
| Mixed land uses where appropriate. | 00:47:52 | |
| Take advantage of compact building design. | 00:47:54 | |
| Create a range of housing opportunities throughout the jurisdiction. | 00:47:56 | |
| Create walkable communities. You'll see the pedestrian infrastructure we're proposing. | 00:47:59 | |
| Preserve open space. Now you could say this is not preserving open space. | 00:48:06 | |
| But what this does is it brings people to a developed area where there is infrastructure that allows remaining properties to the | 00:48:09 | |
| county to remain. | 00:48:13 | |
| To remain open and undeveloped. | 00:48:17 | |
| Strengthen development Development toward existing communities. | 00:48:20 | |
| Again at Highlander Point. | 00:48:23 | |
| We're at Highlander Point. | 00:48:25 | |
| And then? | 00:48:28 | |
| Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration. | 00:48:30 | |
| You have a very interactive process, as you know with TRC meetings. | 00:48:33 | |
| We took that TRC meeting and those comments from that TRC meeting to heart. | 00:48:36 | |
| And made very significant changes to the plan. | 00:48:40 | |
| The original proposal was, I think, about 156 multifamily dwellings, dwelling units. | 00:48:43 | |
| And a comparable number of retail. | 00:48:48 | |
| The developer shrunk that to 125, split the bank out, per TRC comments. | 00:48:51 | |
| Added the buffering we'll talk about. | 00:48:55 | |
| So he's listening is the point. He's listening and adapting. | 00:48:58 | |
| Theme places to live a lot again, a lot of those. | 00:49:02 | |
| Objectives from the goals meet this this project. I can give you copies of this. | 00:49:07 | |
| When we're finished. | 00:49:12 | |
| Promoting locally grown and owned. | 00:49:13 | |
| It is anticipated that a lot of these retail establishments will be local businesses, locally owned businesses. | 00:49:16 | |
| We're thinking the bank is going to be a relatively small regional bank. | 00:49:22 | |
| Not a necessarily a National Bank. | 00:49:26 | |
| Then your comp plan says direct hire residential developments toward areas of the proximity to adequate infrastructure and public | 00:49:30 | |
| services. | 00:49:33 | |
| Where appropriate, higher density. | 00:49:36 | |
| Patio homes. Multi family development should be directed toward established urban areas based on proximity to existing services | 00:49:38 | |
| and density. | 00:49:42 | |
| Multi family development should be limited to area to areas where they're again access to commercial. | 00:49:45 | |
| Surrounded by utilities. | 00:49:51 | |
| The comp plan designates the Highlander Point as a commercial growth area. | 00:49:54 | |
| Everyone realizes that. | 00:49:58 | |
| A commercial should be. | 00:50:01 | |
| Targeted toward Highlander. The Highlander Point corridor specifically says that. | 00:50:02 | |
| This is the Georgetown Township excerpt from the comp plan. | 00:50:07 | |
| That that. | 00:50:11 | |
| Dark dark box in the upper right hand corner is the location of this. | 00:50:12 | |
| The comp plan for Georgetown mostly focuses on the Edwardsville. | 00:50:16 | |
| Gateway and the Edwardsville Interchange because this site really is more closely related to the Lafayette Township. The east | 00:50:20 | |
| boundary of This site is Lafayette Township. | 00:50:25 | |
| So this is the Lafayette Township map. | 00:50:30 | |
| Map with the box showing the area again. It shows that as an intense development area by your comp plan. | 00:50:32 | |
| Future land use in Georgetown Township would be directed toward existing infrastructure. That's a theme throughout your comp plan. | 00:50:40 | |
| I'll try and skip that. | 00:50:44 | |
| Commercial again at. | 00:50:49 | |
| And this is average for Gateway for Georgetown? | 00:50:50 | |
| Same language in Lafayette even says similar to Georgetown. | 00:50:53 | |
| And then future commercial will be located at Hallander Point. | 00:50:57 | |
| Properties already zoned commercial, but we are. | 00:51:00 | |
| Continuing to implement. | 00:51:03 | |
| Commercial element. | 00:51:04 | |
| This project. | 00:51:06 | |
| Current conditions and structures. | 00:51:07 | |
| Again, there there is quite a bit of development happening and that has happened around this area. | 00:51:09 | |
| You have Highlander Point Commercial. | 00:51:14 | |
| District East. | 00:51:16 | |
| You have additional commercial just east of this with the gas station. | 00:51:17 | |
| Williamsburg Station, the bank that's coming in. | 00:51:21 | |
| This project, as Nick said, would. | 00:51:25 | |
| It's a nice transition from. | 00:51:28 | |
| Commercial. Intense commercial. | 00:51:30 | |
| Through higher density residential to lower density, even though it's still your residential urban. | 00:51:31 | |
| Zoning. | 00:51:37 | |
| And then this is a rendering of the building which you've seen in the package. | 00:51:38 | |
| It is a very similar to what you see right across the street. | 00:51:42 | |
| So the subdivision it is 2 commercial lots. | 00:51:49 | |
| Would be a new road connecting the stub and villas of Floyd Knobs to Schreiber. | 00:51:51 | |
| And if the MF and PUD MF are approved, the subdivision would meet all your requirements. | 00:51:56 | |
| John talked about what a PUD means. | 00:52:06 | |
| So the PUD in this particular case also. | 00:52:09 | |
| Satisfies the development plan. I'll mention that later, but keep in mind when I'm talking about these PUD plans, I'm also talking | 00:52:12 | |
| about the development plan. | 00:52:15 | |
| Again, this is the engineering. | 00:52:19 | |
| Site plan to support the development plan and the PUD. | 00:52:21 | |
| It does feature the three buildings. | 00:52:25 | |
| Also, it features the amenities. There's a swimming pool plan on lot 1. | 00:52:27 | |
| There's an outdoor kitchen and outdoor seating and the outdoor games area that Mister Creeby mentioned earlier. | 00:52:32 | |
| As well as open space to the West. | 00:52:37 | |
| That those facilities are intended to serve both. | 00:52:40 | |
| Both Watts in the neighborhood. | 00:52:44 | |
| Same parameters I listed earlier. | 00:52:47 | |
| There are two entrances from Lot 11 onto the proposed road and one on to Tuscany. | 00:52:50 | |
| There are three interests from Lot 2, one on to Shriver and two onto the proposed roadway. | 00:52:55 | |
| There are pedestrian walks and crossings throughout the site. | 00:53:00 | |
| One interesting feature of the site is that is that once the traffic signal is installed at Schreiber. | 00:53:02 | |
| That has pedestrian crosswalks included as part of the project. | 00:53:09 | |
| You'll be able to walk from villas of Floyd Knobs or the Highlands all the way to anywhere you want to go in Highlander Point. | 00:53:12 | |
| It's going to, it's going to facilitate pedestrian access for that whole region. | 00:53:18 | |
| Again, the amenities on Lot 1. | 00:53:23 | |
| Parking. | 00:53:26 | |
| Lot 1. We've allocated 50 spaces for the proposed retail bank. | 00:53:28 | |
| That leaves 1100. | 00:53:33 | |
| 111 spaces for the multifamily which is 1.88. | 00:53:35 | |
| Spaces per dwelling unit. | 00:53:38 | |
| 127 spaces on Lot 2. | 00:53:40 | |
| Which? | 00:53:43 | |
| Yields 1.92 spaces per dwelling unit. | 00:53:44 | |
| Mr. Creeby mentioned that your ordinance requires 2.5 spaces per dwelling unit. It makes no distinction as to whether they're one | 00:53:47 | |
| bedroom or two-bedroom. | 00:53:51 | |
| I personally believe that's overparked. | 00:53:55 | |
| I did pick up the. | 00:53:58 | |
| Institute of Traffic Engineers Parking generation manual. | 00:54:00 | |
| They indicate that retail is. | 00:54:03 | |
| 5.45 spaces per 1000 square foot of retail, which would be 6 about 62 spaces required. | 00:54:07 | |
| One bedroom units are 1.38 spaces per unit. | 00:54:13 | |
| And a two-bedroom unit is 2.08 spaces per unit. | 00:54:17 | |
| Using a total requirement per ITE. | 00:54:19 | |
| About 265 and we're providing 288. | 00:54:22 | |
| And I can give you copies of this. | 00:54:26 | |
| After the presentation. | 00:54:27 | |
| Lot area. | 00:54:30 | |
| So lot 1. | 00:54:31 | |
| The the pool and the recreation area to me should be included in open space. | 00:54:33 | |
| If you don't include it in open space. | 00:54:37 | |
| Or if you we have 68.8% impervious area. | 00:54:40 | |
| If you do include it as open space, we have 61.5. | 00:54:44 | |
| The MF ordinance require it allows 65. | 00:54:48 | |
| Lot 2 we have a 71.5. | 00:54:52 | |
| Making an overall of 69.85. | 00:54:55 | |
| Or if you exclude the right out the recreation area is 65.4 so very close to what MF? | 00:54:58 | |
| Would otherwise allow. | 00:55:04 | |
| We do have significant landscaping and as Mr. Crete. | 00:55:06 | |
| We do meet the ordinance as far as plantings along the roadways. | 00:55:09 | |
| Parking lot screening and parking islands with plantings. | 00:55:13 | |
| And then we did add the buffer along the West side for bills of fluid knobs. | 00:55:17 | |
| With a wall that is concrete. | 00:55:22 | |
| With plantings behind it, which is specified as a type 2 buffer. | 00:55:24 | |
| We did not do that along. | 00:55:28 | |
| The South Side. | 00:55:30 | |
| I spoke with Mr. Tieneman after we received Mr. Kibe staff report. He is willing to do that but he would like to make a change. | 00:55:32 | |
| Previously, the wall was planned to be brick on both sides. | 00:55:39 | |
| He spent a lot of time in Florida lately and they have products there that would be concrete walls with stucco. | 00:55:42 | |
| On either side that are still very attractive. | 00:55:48 | |
| And so. | 00:55:51 | |
| He would extend this wall to be 300 feet. | 00:55:52 | |
| Along the South line. | 00:55:54 | |
| There's a Creek that runs from that wider island there. | 00:55:56 | |
| We can. Once you get past that Creek, it really doesn't make sense to buffer that area. So he would extend the buffer the wall. | 00:55:59 | |
| That extra 300 feet with the plantings and that would then meet the requirements of type 2. | 00:56:05 | |
| That that about 70 foot stretch. | 00:56:10 | |
| On the east side of the Creek would not, but we still have the plantings there. | 00:56:12 | |
| And you can see that's the front yard of the neighbor. | 00:56:16 | |
| It should be less intrusive to him at that area. | 00:56:20 | |
| The lighting plan meets the standards of the ordinance. No no fixture is taller than 20 feet and it's all down lighting. | 00:56:24 | |
| These are the proposed lighting fixtures. | 00:56:31 | |
| Just so we're showing a unified. | 00:56:33 | |
| Design The sign plan meets the requirements of the ordinance. There are two monument signs, one at Tuscany and one at Knox Lane | 00:56:35 | |
| Knox Landing Blvd. at Schreiber. | 00:56:41 | |
| And all the building signage would comply with the existing sign against. | 00:56:46 | |
| Ordinance the building facades. It's an attractive building. It meets the state requirements of the Highlander Point Overlay | 00:56:50 | |
| District. | 00:56:53 | |
| Brick, stone and Hardy. | 00:56:57 | |
| You've seen that. | 00:56:59 | |
| This is a blow up of the building 1. | 00:57:01 | |
| Rendering This is a blow up of the Building 2 rendering which is on the South lot. | 00:57:04 | |
| And this is the the bank with building one in the background. | 00:57:08 | |
| OK. So common concerns that we hear always traffic. I know you've heard it from the audience today. | 00:57:15 | |
| I'm not sure how many people are aware, but the county is planning to install a traffic signal at Shriver and Old Vincennes. | 00:57:20 | |
| That has been in the plan. They're also upgrading Open Olden Sins. | 00:57:27 | |
| The traffic study indicates that. | 00:57:30 | |
| The intersections as proposed in the design year for original traffic study will also operate an acceptable level. | 00:57:33 | |
| With additional traffic from this proposed development. | 00:57:38 | |
| Drainage Fluke County is the most stringent drainage requirements in the region. | 00:57:41 | |
| We anticipate stormwater and underground detention facilities circled there in the light blue. | 00:57:46 | |
| That that wider island that you saw is the discharge town. | 00:57:52 | |
| And then the county had commissioned a study for this whole area back in 2021. | 00:57:56 | |
| That showed if development continued in accordance with your stormwater ordinance, that things will get better overtime. | 00:58:01 | |
| Questions. | 00:58:09 | |
| OK, you didn't do bad. You missed about 15 seconds. Sorry about that. | 00:58:11 | |
| I do have a question OK, any that's why any questions for Mr. | 00:58:15 | |
| I'm a little unclear on your on your wall. | 00:58:20 | |
| On your wall. | 00:58:23 | |
| Are you leaving Brick at Tuscany? | 00:58:25 | |
| Are you switching it wanting to switch it all to the stucco wall? | 00:58:27 | |
| He would request that we could switch it all to the stucco wall. | 00:58:32 | |
| Because of the additional length. | 00:58:35 | |
| That's a request. | 00:58:37 | |
| So when you're you're saying 300 feet. | 00:58:38 | |
| This is the additional approximately 300 feet. | 00:58:41 | |
| Cortana. | 00:58:46 | |
| That's the landscape plan. This is the 300 feet you're talking about, correct? | 00:58:48 | |
| It's it's this. | 00:58:52 | |
| It's this area here. | 00:58:53 | |
| Just that's that's turned, yes, just short of that wider island there. | 00:58:56 | |
| You do show. | 00:59:03 | |
| 60 foot of a vinyl fence. | 00:59:06 | |
| Oh. | 00:59:09 | |
| That's for parking lot screening. | 00:59:10 | |
| Your ordinance requires a three foot understand why is it there? | 00:59:13 | |
| I'm just wondering if we should make it. | 00:59:18 | |
| Match the rest of the ball. | 00:59:20 | |
| Question something? | 00:59:23 | |
| Instead of final, maybe 60 feet. | 00:59:26 | |
| I, I'm going to, I'm going to step out on a limb and say, well, that's. | 00:59:29 | |
| I just think it ought to match I guess. | 00:59:34 | |
| No problem. | 00:59:36 | |
| My first meeting SO. | 00:59:39 | |
| Indulge me, what were you talking about the fence parking lot then? | 00:59:44 | |
| There. | 00:59:49 | |
| There's a little piece of fence right here. | 00:59:51 | |
| That's supposed to be final. | 00:59:54 | |
| You're in the part of our ordinance says you've got to screen the parking lot. | 00:59:56 | |
| Correct. The ordinance requires any parking that faces a street or a neighbor has to be screened with three foot tall shrubs. | 00:59:59 | |
| Over 3 foot tall fence. | 01:00:06 | |
| So we can't fit shrubs in that area because it's tied up to the right of way. | 01:00:08 | |
| So I was proposing a fence. | 01:00:11 | |
| Battle. If it has to be a wall, I don't. | 01:00:13 | |
| I think that's a yeah. | 01:00:16 | |
| Yeah, understood. | 01:00:18 | |
| Yeah, this may be a question for the developer, but in terms of the. | 01:00:20 | |
| Target renter. | 01:00:24 | |
| Are we looking at Class A facilities or what kind of amenities, what kind of people are we targeting? | 01:00:26 | |
| To inhabit the buildings, what he's told me is granite countertops, you know, very nice facilities. I think he's targeting the | 01:00:31 | |
| minimum rent to be 1500. | 01:00:35 | |
| For a one bedroom. | 01:00:40 | |
| Well, give me a. | 01:00:42 | |
| All right. Anybody else? | 01:00:46 | |
| I do have one question, the Connector Rd. that's that is proposed, will there be parking allowed on that road? No. OK. Will you | 01:00:51 | |
| make sure that that's. | 01:00:56 | |
| Either signage or somehow. | 01:01:01 | |
| Make sure that doesn't happen because I could see that. | 01:01:03 | |
| In advance I could get. | 01:01:06 | |
| Crowded. | 01:01:08 | |
| All right, go ahead next. | 01:01:10 | |
| That will be a county. | 01:01:14 | |
| Road County. | 01:01:15 | |
| Oh, it's Canada. | 01:01:17 | |
| They will. They'll. | 01:01:19 | |
| It'll be dedicated to the county after it's called, so it's dedicated to the county. | 01:01:21 | |
| OK, All right. Makes it so we'll let Frank make that decision. | 01:01:26 | |
| No. | 01:01:33 | |
| Oh, I meant to start out. | 01:01:35 | |
| And say that. | 01:01:40 | |
| I appreciate all the changes that were made, I think. | 01:01:42 | |
| Several of the comments came from me about. | 01:01:47 | |
| Moving the bank and. | 01:01:49 | |
| All of that and I think it's a much improved plan over what was originally presented, so. | 01:01:50 | |
| You reduce the number of apartments, you move the bank. | 01:01:57 | |
| So I do like to plan much better than was originally submitted. | 01:02:01 | |
| Great. Thank you. | 01:02:05 | |
| All right. At this time, what we'd like to do. | 01:02:07 | |
| And and just I'd like for everybody just be respectful. | 01:02:10 | |
| And kind of hold your comments down, if you will. | 01:02:13 | |
| We're going to we're going to open up 20 minute session. | 01:02:16 | |
| For anybody that like to speak in favor of this project, come forward in favor. | 01:02:19 | |
| In favor. | 01:02:24 | |
| OK, state your name. | 01:02:26 | |
| I'd like to thank them for all the wonderful. I need your name and address, I'm sorry. | 01:02:30 | |
| OK. | 01:02:35 | |
| And I have an 8047 Schreiber Rd. | 01:02:36 | |
| But I am speaking in favor of this project. I respect the wonderful things he has provided our community. | 01:02:39 | |
| So I will say thank you for that, but. | 01:02:47 | |
| You know, we don't always build wonderful things. I'm gonna support something that's not so wonderful because I can think of. | 01:02:50 | |
| 1019 people you know since. | 01:02:56 | |
| Friday night. | 01:02:59 | |
| That think this is a bad idea. | 01:03:00 | |
| So I think he'll need a little support. | 01:03:02 | |
| I'll say that the idea that they didn't have enough room to put shrubbery behind the fence, it's laughable. | 01:03:04 | |
| The idea that. | 01:03:10 | |
| You know pedestrians will be playing in a roundabout. | 01:03:11 | |
| That's going to be built in the future. | 01:03:15 | |
| Is asinine. | 01:03:17 | |
| I mean, I know you all might have agendas or might have your minds made-up, but this is a bad idea. This does not. | 01:03:19 | |
| I don't know if you read the same comprehensive plan that I did the same, you know, Highlander point. | 01:03:26 | |
| Gateway plan that I read, but I guess it's up for interpretation. | 01:03:32 | |
| This is zoning change. | 01:03:36 | |
| I don't believe. | 01:03:38 | |
| That that zoning change fits the vision that you had been outlaid. | 01:03:39 | |
| That I read about. | 01:03:43 | |
| I can say that. | 01:03:45 | |
| When I read about the Highlander point plan. | 01:03:46 | |
| It was unfavorable to have multifamily housing in that area. That was the least. | 01:03:49 | |
| The least liked proposal. | 01:03:53 | |
| So what's changed? | 01:03:55 | |
| We don't need the destination. | 01:03:57 | |
| You know, if you have pedestrians, it's going to be even more chaos. | 01:04:00 | |
| And it's already bad and terrible traffic. | 01:04:04 | |
| I like this area. This is a great area. I think we are going to be. | 01:04:07 | |
| Value is by allowing this to go through. | 01:04:10 | |
| So I implore you, please. | 01:04:13 | |
| Don't. | 01:04:16 | |
| Don't let this happen. | 01:04:17 | |
| This is a nice place. We should have nice places. People should aspire to be in nice places. We want to encourage home ownership, | 01:04:20 | |
| not rental. OK, I'm going to cut you. Cut you off. | 01:04:25 | |
| I think you've taken. | 01:04:30 | |
| More in an opposition side than a favorable side, so. | 01:04:32 | |
| But we'll. | 01:04:35 | |
| We'll let you come back up and take the time away from the opposition if you want to. I'm just trying to be fair here. | 01:04:36 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:04:42 | |
| This is in favor. | 01:04:43 | |
| Please. | 01:04:44 | |
| More than in the favor. | 01:04:45 | |
| I'm saying your name and your address. Brian's are sweet. OK, I live in the house South. | 01:04:47 | |
| If you bring the picture back up, just tell us your address please. | 01:04:54 | |
| It's 5007 over in Saints Row, its original house. Go ahead. | 01:04:57 | |
| Main road was my driveway. | 01:05:02 | |
| OK. | 01:05:05 | |
| If she can get rid of the thing up there. | 01:05:06 | |
| You just go ahead with your comments please. What I'm trying to do is. | 01:05:10 | |
| You're changing the. | 01:05:14 | |
| The Creek you're putting. | 01:05:15 | |
| 660 inch pipes in. | 01:05:18 | |
| It's going to come down to my driveway, which is a 24 inch. I'm going to have to stop you too. It sounds like you're in | 01:05:22 | |
| opposition. | 01:05:25 | |
| No, no, no, I'm not in opposition. | 01:05:28 | |
| Get this on the record. | 01:05:31 | |
| Why the engineers people were here and the developers. Do you have some positive to say about this project? I'm just trying to get | 01:05:33 | |
| you to let me tell you what I need to do because I'm the guy on the side that's going to be effective. OK, I'm going to ask you to | 01:05:39 | |
| come up when the opposition time comes up, if you don't mind, Sir. | 01:05:45 | |
| You're talking, I'm just trying to explain to me what. | 01:05:51 | |
| I want you to put in. | 01:05:55 | |
| For the engineers to do, it's not going to be a. | 01:05:57 | |
| You know, either would. | 01:06:00 | |
| Yeah, it's just trying to tell you. Do you have something to say in favor of this petition? | 01:06:01 | |
| Is the question yes or no? | 01:06:07 | |
| If you do, say it. | 01:06:10 | |
| I'm Either way, you need to sit down, Sir. Thank you very much for your time. | 01:06:11 | |
| Winner, Let me one more. | 01:06:16 | |
| Officer, would you please remove this man from this meeting? | 01:06:18 | |
| All because I live next door. | 01:06:25 | |
| I asked you to sit down three times, Sir. I'm sorry. | 01:06:28 | |
| All right, one more, one more time. | 01:06:34 | |
| Is there anybody that has anything that they like to say in favor of this project? Please come forward. | 01:06:36 | |
| In favor. | 01:06:42 | |
| Please umm. | 01:06:44 | |
| Ladies and gentlemen, we have a process and please respect it. | 01:06:47 | |
| We're just, we're doing a job up here. If we're trying to do our job, please let us do it. That's all I ask you. | 01:06:50 | |
| We're going to give everybody the same respect. | 01:06:56 | |
| That's all I ask you to do. | 01:06:58 | |
| Anybody else in favor of this, please step forward. | 01:07:00 | |
| OK. Is there any Sherry? | 01:07:03 | |
| We got we got an off site location because. | 01:07:07 | |
| Our elevator is broke down. Sherry, would you come forward and tell us whether we have somebody there once I speak in favor of | 01:07:11 | |
| this? | 01:07:14 | |
| No, you do not. OK. Thank you, Sherry. Appreciate. | 01:07:19 | |
| OK at this time. | 01:07:23 | |
| If you will start the. | 01:07:26 | |
| Go ahead. Laram, Sarah. | 01:07:27 | |
| I will. I will. | 01:07:31 | |
| At this time we start the timer for the opposition And what I asked. | 01:07:32 | |
| Hold on. | 01:07:37 | |
| Please give us a minute here. | 01:07:37 | |
| What I ask you to do is. | 01:07:40 | |
| For the for the courtesy of people that want to speak. | 01:07:42 | |
| If somebody already brought something up about. | 01:07:45 | |
| The traffic. | 01:07:47 | |
| Are something that drainage or something that? | 01:07:49 | |
| Please don't repeat it, save room for somebody has something new to say but. | 01:07:51 | |
| At that point this gentleman. | 01:07:55 | |
| Right here, if you will. | 01:07:57 | |
| Remember, there's people behind you, so give us give them time, please. And we do just so that everybody's on the same page. We do | 01:07:59 | |
| have a time limit. It's 20 minutes. | 01:08:03 | |
| That is for everyone that wishes to speak in opposition so. | 01:08:07 | |
| It's 10 minutes normally on our PER. | 01:08:12 | |
| For our requirements. | 01:08:15 | |
| Well I think what they see is so on the screen it does say 10. That is because it only allows her to do 10. So when it hits 10 she | 01:08:17 | |
| will reset it for another 10 so. | 01:08:21 | |
| That is for everyone, not for each person. Yeah, we will get back to 20. It's just thank you. | 01:08:26 | |
| My name is Bill Emerson. I live at 339 Custody Drive in the village of Floyd's Knobs. | 01:08:33 | |
| We bought our. | 01:08:39 | |
| Lot in 2020 and. | 01:08:40 | |
| Don theme and build up. | 01:08:43 | |
| House quality house that we wanted. | 01:08:44 | |
| During our meeting with Mr. Theme and we asked what he would be building on the adjacent property. | 01:08:47 | |
| Which we're talking about today. | 01:08:53 | |
| He said. | 01:08:55 | |
| Build a medical services building along old business ends and might build a senior community with possible assisted living | 01:08:57 | |
| community. | 01:09:00 | |
| On the rest of the acreage? | 01:09:04 | |
| That sounded good to us. | 01:09:06 | |
| We love living the village of Floyd's Knobs. | 01:09:08 | |
| Walk me to our location for the convenience of having amenities that we wanted nearby. | 01:09:11 | |
| I would much rather the Don Theman build what he suggested to us. | 01:09:17 | |
| Rather than the. | 01:09:22 | |
| I do not support the project as presented tonight. | 01:09:25 | |
| I would really like to see. | 01:09:29 | |
| Mr. Thieneman. | 01:09:32 | |
| Complete the villas. | 01:09:33 | |
| Rather than us having to continue to live in the construction. | 01:09:35 | |
| Zone site. They're in Phillips. | 01:09:39 | |
| I like the houses he builds, he does a great job. | 01:09:44 | |
| But if you drove up into the villas or you drove over to the other. | 01:09:47 | |
| Project over in Georgetown. | 01:09:51 | |
| It's an unfinished project. | 01:09:53 | |
| And and those of us who live there. | 01:09:55 | |
| Are really held hostage? | 01:09:58 | |
| By an unfinished project where we can't have our own homeowners association until Dawn finishes the project. | 01:10:00 | |
| I really wish you all would put something in. | 01:10:07 | |
| And your bylaws or whatever if a project is started. | 01:10:10 | |
| Then it needs to be finished at some particular point. | 01:10:15 | |
| Our development was not that large that it couldn't be finished. | 01:10:19 | |
| And the and the other piece of that is. | 01:10:23 | |
| The walkability. | 01:10:25 | |
| We have sidewalks once our house is built. | 01:10:27 | |
| But we have large amounts of space in our in our. | 01:10:31 | |
| On Tuscany. On Milan. | 01:10:34 | |
| That we have to walk in the street. | 01:10:36 | |
| So it's a walkability neighborhood. | 01:10:38 | |
| But Don hasn't finished the sidewalks. | 01:10:41 | |
| That are that need to be finished they cross the line across Tuscany so anyway. | 01:10:45 | |
| I do not agree with Mr. Cooperates to comment about. | 01:10:52 | |
| This states that the rezoning would not be injurious to the value of the profit in the area. | 01:10:56 | |
| Come on, when did you ever put apartments next to? | 01:11:02 | |
| Houses and never lowered the property. | 01:11:06 | |
| And I'd say the same thing there. | 01:11:09 | |
| You put apartments next to houses, you lower the property. | 01:11:11 | |
| I'm grateful that the original location of the bank. | 01:11:16 | |
| Has been moved. I'm glad that the project is not as large as it once was. I appreciate that. | 01:11:19 | |
| The change in the fence. | 01:11:27 | |
| I want the masonry brick fence. | 01:11:29 | |
| I'm with the masonry. | 01:11:32 | |
| I don't want the stucco fence. I've seen them. Nice. | 01:11:35 | |
| But what? | 01:11:39 | |
| We have is. | 01:11:40 | |
| I want the brick fence. | 01:11:42 | |
| My biggest concern about the project. | 01:11:46 | |
| Is. | 01:11:49 | |
| The dumpsters. | 01:11:50 | |
| One of them is right there at the entrance to Tuscany Drive. | 01:11:52 | |
| Right by very first house on the left on Tuscany. | 01:11:56 | |
| You've got a you've got a 24 foot dumpster corral. | 01:12:01 | |
| And then right behind the winnings house back there on the second building be built. | 01:12:05 | |
| Also is a large dumpster corral right behind those homes? | 01:12:10 | |
| I don't want I don't know how often they pick up those dumpsters and apartments, whether that's once a week or. | 01:12:16 | |
| Three times a week. | 01:12:21 | |
| I just I don't want the. | 01:12:23 | |
| This put the dumpsters. | 01:12:25 | |
| Does your way? | 01:12:27 | |
| Sir, you have to talk to us. You can't talk to anybody. I'm sorry. | 01:12:32 | |
| Move the dumpsters. | 01:12:42 | |
| Move the dump. | 01:12:44 | |
| And if you move the dumpsters. | 01:12:45 | |
| I can. I can probably live with it. | 01:12:47 | |
| That I don't like where the dumpsters are at all for the people in the village of Floyd's Knobs. | 01:12:49 | |
| So anyway, I would encourage you to make those changes before you vote tonight. | 01:12:57 | |
| All right. Thank you, Bill. | 01:13:01 | |
| All right, come forward. State your name and address for us, Sir. | 01:13:03 | |
| 10th Interest Property owner .740 N Luther Rd. I cannot think of anything that would cause more problems. | 01:13:06 | |
| On old Vincennes Rd. in the traffic flow then this project right here. | 01:13:13 | |
| It is time for the people to speak up. | 01:13:18 | |
| We have a nightmare there, we all know it. | 01:13:20 | |
| We all know it, the change in zoning. | 01:13:24 | |
| Is wrong. | 01:13:26 | |
| Is wrong. Saying pedestrian traffic can crossover Vincent's road is crazy. | 01:13:28 | |
| Somebody's gonna die. | 01:13:33 | |
| I drive that bus through there twice a day and it is a nightmare. | 01:13:35 | |
| Now I need that. | 01:13:39 | |
| Were certified letters. | 01:13:40 | |
| Sent out for this yet? | 01:13:42 | |
| For affected property owners in here. | 01:13:44 | |
| No, we're just OK. | 01:13:46 | |
| You want that? You want me to answer that? | 01:13:48 | |
| Yeah, go ahead. OK. Have they been sent out? | 01:13:50 | |
| Yes, they have. | 01:13:53 | |
| Yes. | 01:13:55 | |
| Just us. | 01:13:57 | |
| Personally, pardon me, was there a list? The reason I ask is this in the past? | 01:13:59 | |
| You see, they were sent out. I can take the past 10 years. | 01:14:04 | |
| I was always included because if you go too deep on that. | 01:14:07 | |
| Especially because of the drainage problem. | 01:14:11 | |
| I want to see. | 01:14:14 | |
| Really tough drainage plan. | 01:14:16 | |
| I want to see it. | 01:14:19 | |
| You held it up. | 01:14:21 | |
| On the on the. | 01:14:22 | |
| Project before over there. | 01:14:25 | |
| The Highlands. | 01:14:27 | |
| And this here, I catch 8, I catch 90% of this. You all know that everybody knows. | 01:14:29 | |
| But I don't want to see a change in zoning here. | 01:14:34 | |
| We have enough problems on Old Vincent's Road. | 01:14:37 | |
| Here's a great example very quickly. | 01:14:41 | |
| 22 Prosser buses leave Floyd Central at. | 01:14:44 | |
| 7:30. | 01:14:48 | |
| In the morning. | 01:14:50 | |
| They have to fight to get the OH Vincent Rd. They have to fight to get 150 interchange. By the time they get them through | 01:14:52 | |
| Charlestown Road and down to Prosser, it's time to bring them home. Education is slipping in this county because of them. | 01:14:59 | |
| Things like that. Right now I asked for a. | 01:15:06 | |
| Negative. | 01:15:09 | |
| Recommendation for this? | 01:15:11 | |
| No more traffic. | 01:15:12 | |
| No more building in that area. | 01:15:15 | |
| Thank you, Mr. | 01:15:16 | |
| Your name and address please. | 01:15:21 | |
| Names Andrew Gromac. I live at 8042 Tribal Rd. in the islands UMM. | 01:15:23 | |
| Evening Commission Board, Real quick, I have a question for you. I just moved here from Arizona in August. | 01:15:28 | |
| Are you guys elected officials? | 01:15:34 | |
| Or just how does that work? Everybody at this table is appointed except. | 01:15:36 | |
| Point on this board. | 01:15:42 | |
| On this board is appointed OK, OK, so you're not this general right here you want to buy the he's appointed. | 01:15:43 | |
| OK. Yes, Sir. Well, the reason I bring that up is. | 01:15:49 | |
| As of. | 01:15:51 | |
| Just before this meeting, if you go to Change.org, there is 1017 signatures. | 01:15:52 | |
| From this area that are opposed to this development plan. | 01:15:58 | |
| Coming from Arizona, where I live is the 4th largest metropolitan area in the United States right now. | 01:16:04 | |
| I moved in an area that was. | 01:16:09 | |
| Semi rural. | 01:16:11 | |
| And watch apartment buildings go up around my my house year after year after year. Over 15 years went from non. | 01:16:12 | |
| No crime at all. | 01:16:20 | |
| To prime rampant throughout my area. | 01:16:21 | |
| The average rent in my neighborhood in the Highlands, I'd have to say is anywhere from. | 01:16:25 | |
| Mortgage is 2500 to mine is just a little over 3000. | 01:16:30 | |
| When you're putting. | 01:16:34 | |
| Apartments up here. | 01:16:36 | |
| These people don't have any skin in the game. They don't own the area that will own their apartments. They don't have any | 01:16:38 | |
| incentive to take care of the area. | 01:16:41 | |
| So besides the traffic, that's already been discussed. | 01:16:45 | |
| And everything else. | 01:16:48 | |
| I'm politely asking. | 01:16:49 | |
| The board to vote nay on this as well. | 01:16:51 | |
| I'm telling you guys that. | 01:16:54 | |
| The Knobs area moved in here because it's rural enough. | 01:16:55 | |
| Where it's semi big city but not big city. You start doing this, the domino effect is going to happen and I promise you guys | 01:16:58 | |
| you're not going to like the outcome. | 01:17:02 | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Sir. | 01:17:05 | |
| Restate your name and address for the address. | 01:17:11 | |
| It's a good thing we're all here right now, because we'd all be stuck at the light at 1:50 for another 5 or 6 more turns if we | 01:17:15 | |
| were all heading home right now. | 01:17:20 | |
| I don't trust a word that the theemans say. If anybody knows what has happened, up it. | 01:17:25 | |
| Heritage Springs neighborhood that he was able to swindle a Dollar General and duplexes. | 01:17:30 | |
| After his plans already went through. | 01:17:35 | |
| I know the neighborhood. | 01:17:38 | |
| Residents tried to fight him on that and somehow he had wording that. | 01:17:39 | |
| Was able to get through and so that. | 01:17:43 | |
| Didn't workout well for them. | 01:17:45 | |
| I have more concern with my schools. | 01:17:47 | |
| My kids and I have all gone through Naomi Blue County Schools. We had the largest middle school in the state of Indiana, which is | 01:17:50 | |
| not a record I would like to hold. | 01:17:54 | |
| Because it's way too many kids. | 01:17:59 | |
| There's not a cap size on classrooms in the state of Indiana, which is also a problem to me because I'm pretty sure the fire | 01:18:02 | |
| department should have one. | 01:18:05 | |
| But you putting in all of these? | 01:18:10 | |
| Residential apartments is going to just. | 01:18:12 | |
| Ruin. I asked. | 01:18:16 | |
| Ruin the class sizes for one. I mean, the teachers are already capped, they can't handle anymore. | 01:18:18 | |
| The kids can't get through lunch lines. | 01:18:23 | |
| Because they are in the longest lunch line ever, they can't sit there and eat. Your kids will come home and tell you that they | 01:18:25 | |
| didn't get to eat lunch today because the line was so long. The buses are so full. | 01:18:31 | |
| You've been into JC or tried to get something at the pharmacy. You're in a 40 minute line trying to cash out. | 01:18:38 | |
| And get your prescriptions picked up because the grocery store can't handle the population that's already there. | 01:18:44 | |
| So it's not just about the traffic, it's about the schools, it's about the community that we've tried to keep. | 01:18:50 | |
| And businesses maybe would be OK in that space. | 01:18:57 | |
| But that many apartments is just a ridiculous amount of people moving into our area. | 01:19:01 | |
| And you can say you did a traffic study. | 01:19:07 | |
| I don't believe it at all. | 01:19:10 | |
| And then there's word that you're not going to let they're going to change the traffic pattern to where you can't go straight | 01:19:11 | |
| across Walgreens. | 01:19:15 | |
| Across 150 that they're going to change it to turn and go up. | 01:19:20 | |
| To your girls Rd. up to 1 old Vincennes the other way and have to try. | 01:19:23 | |
| Turn around. That makes no sense, but I heard that today from Qatar construction people. | 01:19:27 | |
| So. | 01:19:32 | |
| Obviously not in favor of this and I think more. | 01:19:34 | |
| My kids school. | 01:19:37 | |
| Than anything at this point. | 01:19:38 | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Taylor. | 01:19:40 | |
| I am speaking in the proper time now. My name is Aaron Jones, 8047 Trevor Rd. | 01:19:47 | |
| There are individuals that approach me that have been unable to sign this petition for one reason or another, whether they do not | 01:19:53 | |
| have. | 01:19:56 | |
| This dude or did not want to, but similar number here. | 01:19:59 | |
| So I just want to state that. | 01:20:02 | |
| But I'll say that. | 01:20:04 | |
| From where I where I moved from? | 01:20:05 | |
| We are very familiar with this issue. | 01:20:07 | |
| I worked very hard to be here. | 01:20:09 | |
| I did my research. I looked at the zoning. I looked at hydrology. I looked at traffic studies. I studied. | 01:20:12 | |
| I believed in this community. | 01:20:18 | |
| I truly did. I wanted to be here. I chose to be here. | 01:20:19 | |
| I worked my **** off to be. | 01:20:22 | |
| So my family would happen. | 01:20:24 | |
| Access to better opportunities than I did. | 01:20:25 | |
| Coming from Jefferson County, they built. | 01:20:28 | |
| This low income, luxury whatever apartments everywhere around me within the South end of Louisville. | 01:20:30 | |
| And you can see how well that's going for them. | 01:20:35 | |
| And how the problems that they have. And I ask you, do you want to be like Louisville? I have faith in you all. | 01:20:37 | |
| I feel like we can be better than Louisville. I'm not saying we are better, I'm just saying that. | 01:20:43 | |
| Our government. | 01:20:46 | |
| Can work better than rules because we can all see how the government is working. We do not want to be like Louisville. I am a | 01:20:47 | |
| refugee. | 01:20:50 | |
| I literally. | 01:20:54 | |
| Don't want to be back right where I was. | 01:20:55 | |
| And once this goes through, it's gonna set precedent work to keep happening and we do not want to devalue our area, whether that | 01:20:58 | |
| be New Albany here there. | 01:21:02 | |
| We have something beautiful that works. We can make it work. | 01:21:06 | |
| But if we. | 01:21:10 | |
| Changing areas that don't need changing. | 01:21:11 | |
| In ways that. | 01:21:13 | |
| We don't support. | 01:21:14 | |
| It doesn't make sense. | 01:21:15 | |
| He could put this anywhere. This is 6 acres. There are other parcels. | 01:21:17 | |
| And this is zoned. | 01:21:21 | |
| In a way that does not support this. | 01:21:23 | |
| So. | 01:21:25 | |
| I don't know why this is an argument. | 01:21:26 | |
| I know he has every right. I think I believe in the free market. I only tell him he can't tell what he wants to. | 01:21:28 | |
| But I believe in the zoning. That's why I bought my house. | 01:21:32 | |
| It's commercial. I don't have to worry about this. | 01:21:35 | |
| But now I'm in the same boat. | 01:21:38 | |
| That's just. | 01:21:40 | |
| I'm sorry that is. | 01:21:41 | |
| It is sickening to me. | 01:21:43 | |
| I'm Scott Sugar, I live at 6378 old Vincennes Rd. | 01:21:52 | |
| I retired up here from the Army as a engineer officer. | 01:21:57 | |
| I am going to touch on a little bit of what some of the other people. | 01:22:01 | |
| And spoke about. | 01:22:04 | |
| But really what I'm going to do is I'm going to ask some questions that I think every. | 01:22:06 | |
| One for the traffic study. | 01:22:11 | |
| Everyone that drives that area goes through those intersections. | 01:22:13 | |
| At 1:50 no Vincents. | 01:22:16 | |
| They know what chaos it is at certain times of day. | 01:22:18 | |
| For a lot of people it is a stressful. | 01:22:21 | |
| Event just going through. | 01:22:23 | |
| That intersection. | 01:22:25 | |
| Making it past Highlander Point headed down to the school. | 01:22:27 | |
| The other thing I want everybody. | 01:22:30 | |
| School buses go through there every day. | 01:22:32 | |
| And. | 01:22:37 | |
| Everybody who has a student down there at Highland Hills. | 01:22:39 | |
| Or at Void Central. | 01:22:42 | |
| Every day we get calls about the school bus situation. | 01:22:44 | |
| Routes canceled. | 01:22:48 | |
| This and. | 01:22:49 | |
| And it's usually two to three a day, honestly. | 01:22:50 | |
| So that's one challenge. | 01:22:52 | |
| And this will impact. | 01:22:54 | |
| The challenges that. | 01:22:56 | |
| The Floyd County school system has. | 01:22:58 | |
| With uh. | 01:23:00 | |
| School traffic, School bus traffic, getting kids to school sometimes. | 01:23:01 | |
| It's a safety concern. | 01:23:05 | |
| The question I have is with that traffic study. | 01:23:07 | |
| Did they account in that traffic study for all the other construction that's going to be going on? | 01:23:10 | |
| Up just north of. | 01:23:15 | |
| The JC. | 01:23:17 | |
| Because. | 01:23:21 | |
| You put this in, it's already going to overtax. | 01:23:23 | |
| A stressful area right there. | 01:23:27 | |
| That intersection. | 01:23:29 | |
| Put even more construction in if there's already plans. | 01:23:30 | |
| Multi Housing. | 01:23:34 | |
| North of the JC? What kind of impact? | 01:23:36 | |
| And a half of that intersection. | 01:23:38 | |
| When we put the stop light in there. | 01:23:41 | |
| That's already going to happen. | 01:23:44 | |
| Act regardless of where you put this, intersect this. | 01:23:46 | |
| Complex in there or not, it's already going to change the dynamic of that in the flow. | 01:23:49 | |
| Off that intersection area and it's going to make more challenge to get through. | 01:23:54 | |
| I think it's a bad idea. | 01:23:59 | |
| To put. | 01:24:02 | |
| This specific. | 01:24:03 | |
| The housing. | 01:24:07 | |
| And have this many people in this area. | 01:24:09 | |
| Just simply because it's. | 01:24:13 | |
| Challenges it's going to have on those intersections. | 01:24:14 | |
| And I know. | 01:24:18 | |
| You know, we all look at growth in the area. | 01:24:19 | |
| We know what's coming. | 01:24:21 | |
| But we've got to fix the plan for it. | 01:24:23 | |
| I don't think that this meets the test as far as effectively. | 01:24:26 | |
| That's just my thank you. | 01:24:32 | |
| My name is Clyde Harrelson. I live off of Buck Creek, so I'm a. | 01:24:39 | |
| Couple miles from the place. | 01:24:42 | |
| But I shot that area. I shot the bank. | 01:24:44 | |
| Why do we need apartments in an area? | 01:24:47 | |
| That has no apartments in it whatsoever. | 01:24:50 | |
| And my main complaint that you all could use or the main complaint you could use is the parking. | 01:24:52 | |
| Who has 1.8 vehicles in a home? | 01:24:57 | |
| They're going to have two-bedroom apartments in there, 45 of them. | 01:25:00 | |
| They'll have at least two cars, if not 3. | 01:25:04 | |
| We went from three cars to two. | 01:25:07 | |
| Just recently, but prior to that, we've always had three vehicles in our family. | 01:25:09 | |
| And I think for no other reason, the parking. | 01:25:13 | |
| Should turn this down if they put in a bank where there's a. | 01:25:16 | |
| Three banks across the street. | 01:25:19 | |
| Why do we need another bank here? | 01:25:21 | |
| They're just they don't want to make the parking. | 01:25:24 | |
| Fit that place because they're not going to make as much money. | 01:25:26 | |
| But if they need to drop that another 50. | 01:25:30 | |
| Units just to make the parking fee. | 01:25:33 | |
| Clyde, sorry, before you leave, what's your address please? | 01:25:36 | |
| 4059 Tanglewood Dr. | 01:25:39 | |
| South of Buck Creek. | 01:25:41 | |
| All right. Thank you. Glad. | 01:25:43 | |
| OK, great. Ladies first. | 01:25:46 | |
| Theresa Temple, 3 to 5 Tuscany Drive. | 01:25:49 | |
| Boys knobs. | 01:25:52 | |
| You turn down Don's. | 01:25:55 | |
| Approval for apartment staff in 2014, did you not? | 01:25:57 | |
| And he offered. | 01:26:00 | |
| To build our homes. | 01:26:02 | |
| 55 and older. | 01:26:03 | |
| Didn't workout. | 01:26:05 | |
| Now it's all families, which is fine. | 01:26:06 | |
| They're supposed to be single family dwellings. Ends up being. | 01:26:08 | |
| One family that has three families living in it. | 01:26:12 | |
| And then the drainage. | 01:26:15 | |
| Back behind where you got. | 01:26:16 | |
| The 301 start with 301. | 01:26:19 | |
| All the way down past where Donnie lives because he lives in our subdivision. | 01:26:22 | |
| All that drainage back there, their yards are all wet all the time. | 01:26:26 | |
| They're never, they're never dry. | 01:26:30 | |
| Florence Hampton had to pick up. | 01:26:32 | |
| All her flips. | 01:26:34 | |
| Stuff in the backyard because it wouldn't have them and stick or grow. | 01:26:36 | |
| Anyway, you're turning down in 2014 for apartments. | 01:26:39 | |
| Turning down again, I like Donnie. | 01:26:41 | |
| He builds a really good homes. | 01:26:44 | |
| In our subdivision. | 01:26:46 | |
| And he hasn't finished what he needs to do. | 01:26:48 | |
| And we know that the grocery store will have a small JC store if you all well know. | 01:26:50 | |
| Now it can't. It can't accommodate all these people. | 01:26:55 | |
| You know. | 01:26:58 | |
| Make a strip mall like he promised. He said he was going to do our a medical stability or something to that effect. But apartments | 01:26:59 | |
| are only going to cause more crime. You know, one of the things the Floyd County Sheriff's told me. | 01:27:04 | |
| That our subdivision was one of the safest subdivisions. | 01:27:09 | |
| Because Tuscany draft. | 01:27:13 | |
| Was one way in and one way out. | 01:27:14 | |
| Do you not agree with that? | 01:27:17 | |
| And now you're getting. | 01:27:19 | |
| All these intersections. | 01:27:20 | |
| Criminals are coming across the bridge. | 01:27:22 | |
| Coming in all of our subdivisions. | 01:27:24 | |
| Because they've got all these little exits to go through. | 01:27:26 | |
| Yeah, I'm not right. | 01:27:29 | |
| I mean, it's true. | 01:27:31 | |
| And we've had several cars broken into even in our subject. | 01:27:32 | |
| Donnie's head stuff stolen from his subdivision, but. | 01:27:35 | |
| You know, you just can't keep building all this. | 01:27:39 | |
| Apartments and it's just gonna bring our. | 01:27:41 | |
| Our values down. | 01:27:44 | |
| And we don't want to. We just don't want it. | 01:27:45 | |
| All right. Thank you. | 01:27:47 | |
| We got we got a minute left. Go ahead, Sir. | 01:27:52 | |
| My name is Spencer Worth and I live at 8040 Schriever. | 01:27:54 | |
| You don't have to. | 01:27:57 | |
| Forgive me for my quick talk, my quick speaking. | 01:27:58 | |
| I agree with many of the points brought up by those behind me. | 01:28:01 | |
| But one thing that I feel like hasn't been brought up is, or at least expounded upon, is the parking. | 01:28:04 | |
| So if if the parking is not enough is not 2 1/2 per unit which my wife and I. | 01:28:09 | |
| Have never had less than two cars. | 01:28:15 | |
| Since we've been married. | 01:28:17 | |
| Where are these industry cars going to go? | 01:28:18 | |
| They're gonna be parking in these neighborhoods next door. | 01:28:20 | |
| And people are that we don't know people who ties the community. | 01:28:22 | |
| Are we walking through our neighborhoods back and forth? | 01:28:26 | |
| And we have no recourse whatsoever. | 01:28:28 | |
| Thank you. | 01:28:30 | |
| Thank you. | 01:28:31 | |
| All right, that closes this this portion if the applicant would like to come up. | 01:28:34 | |
| And rebut what was spoken about. | 01:28:39 | |
| You've got 5 minutes. | 01:28:44 | |
| I'll speak very quickly. Just a couple things to deal with. I'm sorry, just a second. | 01:28:47 | |
| Make sure nobody. | 01:28:53 | |
| Yeah, we got opened up for down. Sorry. We just need to make sure to wait downstairs because the elevators out. | 01:28:54 | |
| Do we have anybody downstairs? | 01:29:00 | |
| In opposition? No, Sir. All right. Thank you. No, Sir. | 01:29:02 | |
| Now you go. Thank you. Very, very quickly, a couple things that Mister Emerson brought up and I think it's important to address 1 | 01:29:06 | |
| primarily deals with. | 01:29:11 | |
| The issue pertaining to. | 01:29:17 | |
| Sidewalks, things of that nature and homeowners association keep in mind under the terms of the restrictive covenants with govern | 01:29:19 | |
| that. | 01:29:23 | |
| Homeowners association is not going to be formed till the last light sells. That's in their restrictions. The other piece of it | 01:29:28 | |
| tends to be there is a non remonstrance clause in each of their subdivision restrictions specifically indicates that they would | 01:29:32 | |
| not. | 01:29:37 | |
| Opposed any type of development that Mister Athena would do on adjacent property. | 01:29:42 | |
| Please let let him speak. It's unclear. | 01:29:51 | |
| And there is a non remonstrance clause in that and they all took title subject to that. | 01:29:53 | |
| A couple other items I think are important. Dealing with one gentleman that said he just moved up there, he moved into the | 01:29:58 | |
| Highlands, which is the brand new subdivision, residential and he wanted rural. So again, I take a little exception to that. | 01:30:05 | |
| The other piece that I think is important is. | 01:30:12 | |
| The wide Shriver Road and the issue with regards to the traffic study. | 01:30:15 | |
| It was done, and Mr. Copper Weight will probably talk about this as well, but it was done in anticipation of all of those. | 01:30:19 | |
| Existing. | 01:30:26 | |
| Developments as well as those that are already on the books as well as looking at this. So it's not a matter that they forgot | 01:30:28 | |
| something. All of those developments were taken into consideration when they did that. | 01:30:34 | |
| I'll let Jason speak on several of the other issues, but again, keep in mind that the restrictive governance primarily deal with | 01:30:40 | |
| when that homeowners association is turned over and likewise when the sidewalks are finished when all of them lots of. | 01:30:46 | |
| I do want to hit on the traffic study. Number one. It used to be that the developer would hire a traffic engineer to do the | 01:30:55 | |
| traffic study. That is no longer the case. It is the county that hires the traffic engineer. So the developer has no influence | 01:31:00 | |
| over the over the traffic study or the traffic engineer. | 01:31:05 | |
| When they did their study at that I reviewed they did take into account all of the. | 01:31:11 | |
| There's Gray woods just to the north of Highlander Point. There's a there was a patio home. | 01:31:15 | |
| There were some proposals that were across Open Sins Rd. | 01:31:21 | |
| There were some other things going on in the air. They took all that into account. | 01:31:25 | |
| And of course, the traffic study reflects that the light is in place. | 01:31:28 | |
| The lights not in place today. | 01:31:31 | |
| We acknowledge that there are traffic issues there today. | 01:31:33 | |
| But when the county finishes constructing that light, it's going to be a whole lot better, and the traffic study shows that. | 01:31:36 | |
| Regarding drainage, I touched on that already. | 01:31:45 | |
| Again, you have the most strict drainage ordinance in the region. | 01:31:48 | |
| I think that's it, unless you have any questions. | 01:31:52 | |
| Oh, wait, one more thing. I'm sorry. | 01:31:57 | |
| Under the general commercial zone, your maximum impervious area is 70%. | 01:31:59 | |
| Under the MF at 65%. | 01:32:04 | |
| Under our PUD plan, it is less than 70%. | 01:32:06 | |
| So we're going to be better on drainage just as a baseline. | 01:32:09 | |
| Yeah, last individual be Daniel Moriarty. Daniel did the. | 01:32:13 | |
| Project the design on it. Likewise, he's going to address some of the issues pertaining to the very same project that he's done | 01:32:18 | |
| throughout Indianapolis area as well as other parts of the state. | 01:32:23 | |
| State your name and address please. | 01:32:28 | |
| 3628. | 01:32:30 | |
| Place in Carmel. | 01:32:32 | |
| And obviously I'm not local so I can't speak to traffic issues and things are going on but. | 01:32:33 | |
| I will say they do a lot of these projects around the. | 01:32:39 | |
| Right bargains, though. | 01:32:41 | |
| Westville. | 01:32:42 | |
| South Bend, Fort Wayne, Bluffton. | 01:32:44 | |
| All all around the state. | 01:32:47 | |
| Always the same issues. | 01:32:49 | |
| But the things I consistently see. | 01:32:50 | |
| Number ones, we said traffic. | 01:32:53 | |
| This there's. | 01:32:55 | |
| Things are gonna happen. | 01:32:56 | |
| This ground, regardless of what happens, time, right, something is going to be built by right. | 01:32:57 | |
| That's not going to stop the traffic. | 01:33:02 | |
| No matter what it is, it's gonna. | 01:33:04 | |
| So if there's traffic issues in the area. | 01:33:06 | |
| Those who are not my opinion, not the responsibility of this landowner to solve the. | 01:33:08 | |
| For the county. | 01:33:14 | |
| I mean that this developed something happening on this property. | 01:33:15 | |
| Is something that. | 01:33:19 | |
| Just. | 01:33:21 | |
| Regardless of what it is, they're still going to be, it sounds like. | 01:33:22 | |
| I'm not here for everybody. The issues. | 01:33:25 | |
| So that was one thing. Secondly, I've got six kids, all six of living apartments. | 01:33:28 | |
| Only once been arrested. | 01:33:32 | |
| He lives at home with me right now. | 01:33:33 | |
| So, umm. | 01:33:35 | |
| There's no. | 01:33:36 | |
| Evidence, at least in it. | 01:33:37 | |
| Brand new development. This is a very high quality development and again I was working with a lot of people around the state. | 01:33:39 | |
| The one thing about that the ambulance has been very refreshing. | 01:33:45 | |
| There's a level of quality that they brought to this development. | 01:33:48 | |
| Is very much higher. | 01:33:51 | |
| Than what I hear from. | 01:33:52 | |
| Every other builder on the state. | 01:33:54 | |
| I'm not, I'm not just saying. | 01:33:55 | |
| That's true. So. | 01:33:57 | |
| So what happens? | 01:33:58 | |
| Rent levels are such. | 01:33:59 | |
| That if you want to say. | 01:34:01 | |
| At least, and I'm sure some people know a lot better than I do, but I don't believe that just. | 01:34:03 | |
| Those higher rent values necessarily bring crime with them. | 01:34:07 | |
| The other thing is the missing middle missing gap. | 01:34:12 | |
| For someone said there's no apartments in the area. | 01:34:14 | |
| Well, kids need apartments. Younger people need apartments to make the transition from school where they had. | 01:34:17 | |
| Ones to eventually have. | 01:34:23 | |
| And if you don't have that high quality piece within your community? | 01:34:25 | |
| Again, just watching it elsewhere. | 01:34:30 | |
| That's that's it. That's. | 01:34:32 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:34:35 | |
| Thank you. | 01:34:36 | |
| No, Sir, you can't. I'm sorry. | 01:34:40 | |
| I don't make the rules I thought. I try to follow them, Sir. | 01:34:43 | |
| OK. | 01:34:47 | |
| At that point, we're done with the petitions rebuttal. At this time, we're looking for ballots. | 01:34:49 | |
| Unless you all have any questions. Unless you have any questions. | 01:34:57 | |
| Questions. | 01:35:00 | |
| Today, understand what our information is as far as. | 01:35:03 | |
| Go ahead. I'd just like to make a couple notes. I know there was concern that they did not receive certified mail. | 01:35:14 | |
| The the requirement for that is 2 lots. | 01:35:21 | |
| Adjacent. | 01:35:24 | |
| From the project site, so if you did not receive the mail. | 01:35:25 | |
| Within 22 lots of that site. | 01:35:31 | |
| It was sent. | 01:35:34 | |
| We do have the the green cards to verify that. | 01:35:35 | |
| Regarding the traffic pattern that was brought up. | 01:35:39 | |
| In dot controls the old Vincennes at 150 intersection and they do have plans to. | 01:35:43 | |
| With projects to correct the issue at that. | 01:35:50 | |
| That's about $7,000,000 I think what the project came in the. | 01:35:54 | |
| Schreiber Road and Old Vincent's light construction is set to start. | 01:36:00 | |
| Beginning of March for that project. | 01:36:05 | |
| And. | 01:36:09 | |
| The traffic study does account for all the other developments proposed in the area. | 01:36:11 | |
| The sheriff was a part of the TRC meeting. | 01:36:17 | |
| And noted that he had no concerns with public safety standpoint from this project. | 01:36:20 | |
| All right. Does anybody have any other questions for Nick, please? | 01:36:26 | |
| Hold it. | 01:36:31 | |
| No. | 01:36:34 | |
| There is a process that they are following. | 01:36:36 | |
| Go ahead, Nick. | 01:36:40 | |
| No, I had a question if Nick could also elaborate to. | 01:36:42 | |
| To the audience there. | 01:36:46 | |
| That there's also projects. | 01:36:50 | |
| On the table right now. | 01:36:52 | |
| Right behind Jacques and a light that's going in on 150 between Luther and. | 01:36:55 | |
| Open Sense. | 01:37:02 | |
| You're gonna, you're just gonna stop. As soon as you come off the Interstate, you're gonna stop. | 01:37:04 | |
| 123. | 01:37:09 | |
| 4-5. | 01:37:12 | |
| Six times between there and Napleton Rd. | 01:37:13 | |
| Well. | 01:37:21 | |
| They're working on. | 01:37:22 | |
| It's it's happening right now. There is a. | 01:37:23 | |
| Study. | 01:37:27 | |
| We have submitted an RFP for preliminary engineering for a light between. | 01:37:28 | |
| Lutheran old consens for a connection. | 01:37:34 | |
| To the Highlander Point area in there. | 01:37:37 | |
| And one final note. | 01:37:41 | |
| This property is currently zoned General Commercial. | 01:37:42 | |
| Traffic for general commercial uses. | 01:37:46 | |
| Are typically higher than. | 01:37:49 | |
| Multifamily or any other residential use. | 01:37:51 | |
| So. | 01:37:54 | |
| What would be allowed by right? | 01:37:55 | |
| Could likely have a greater impact on the traffic than what this proposal would suggest. | 01:37:57 | |
| Right. | 01:38:03 | |
| All right, all right. | 01:38:05 | |
| May have to ask people to just. | 01:38:08 | |
| All right. At this time, no other board questions. | 01:38:16 | |
| OK. | 01:38:20 | |
| Nick, you want to? | 01:38:22 | |
| Nick, you want you want to just go through the process just one more time on the agenda items as far as. | 01:38:27 | |
| Which one of these items is? | 01:38:33 | |
| The options of the board so they. | 01:38:36 | |
| Clearly understand so the rezoning requests in the PUD rezone. | 01:38:38 | |
| Our recommendations to the. | 01:38:43 | |
| County commissioners. | 01:38:46 | |
| So that just sorry, I want to make sure. I think they want a little direction too. So that would be your docket item ending in O2. | 01:38:48 | |
| And that's the rezone. | 01:38:54 | |
| And your docket item ending in 04 is your put correct? | 01:38:56 | |
| Go ahead. And 03 is the major subdivision. | 01:39:01 | |
| Huh. And then docket item 05 is the detailed development plan. | 01:39:04 | |
| Associated with the. | 01:39:08 | |
| OK. | 01:39:10 | |
| OK, everybody. | 01:39:12 | |
| Claire So in, two in. | 01:39:14 | |
| For both favorable, unfavorable or no recommendation. | 01:39:16 | |
| And then the other two ending in three and five would be granting or denying. | 01:39:21 | |
| Any questions on those and? | 01:39:28 | |
| One ballot at a time. So you're going to start with the O2, start with O2. | 01:39:30 | |
| All right, we need a ballot from somebody, please. Docket FC01-25-02, Petitioner, theme and group. | 01:39:34 | |
| Decision. | 01:39:41 | |
| After careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission finds that one. | 01:39:42 | |
| Rezoning of subject property is consistent with Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 01:39:47 | |
| Because the Conflict County Comprehensive Plan identifies the area. | 01:39:52 | |
| As commercial growth area. | 01:39:55 | |
| Rose planned unit development will be. | 01:39:57 | |
| Mixed-use featuring a commercial element nearest to Old Vincent's Road. | 01:40:00 | |
| Additionally, rezoning is consistent with. | 01:40:05 | |
| Smart growth principles identified in the pan. | 01:40:07 | |
| Specifically, mixed land uses compact building design. | 01:40:10 | |
| Creating a range of housing opportunities. | 01:40:13 | |
| Directing development towards existing communities and preserving open space, farmland, natural beauty and critical environment | 01:40:16 | |
| areas. | 01:40:19 | |
| As this is an infill development. | 01:40:23 | |
| #2. | 01:40:25 | |
| The rezoning of subject property is consistent with the current conditions. | 01:40:27 | |
| And the character of the current structures and uses in the area because commercial uses. | 01:40:30 | |
| At the front of the. | 01:40:35 | |
| The lot are consistent with the original general commercial zoning. | 01:40:36 | |
| The multiplication. | 01:40:40 | |
| The multifamily uses are appropriate. | 01:40:43 | |
| Transitional uses between general commercial and urban residential uses. | 01:40:46 | |
| Building facade materials are to be brick and Hardy board. | 01:40:51 | |
| Structures are within the height limits. | 01:40:54 | |
| Of the Flower County zoning ordinance. | 01:40:56 | |
| And there there is another three story building in the vicinity. | 01:40:59 | |
| #3 The rezoning of subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land. | 01:41:03 | |
| Because the rezoning follows smart growth principles already noted. | 01:41:08 | |
| It also provides additional housing identified as needed in the Purdue Housing Report. | 01:41:12 | |
| The county had completed in 2020. | 01:41:17 | |
| Is a mixed-use infill development. | 01:41:19 | |
| In the commercial growth area? | 01:41:22 | |
| #4 the rezoning of subject property. | 01:41:23 | |
| Will not be interest to the value of other properties in the area. | 01:41:26 | |
| Because commercial uses are consistent with general commercial zoning and appropriate adjacent to residential urban zoning and | 01:41:30 | |
| uses. | 01:41:33 | |
| The addition of a multi family component will support local business customer base. | 01:41:37 | |
| The development will increase the value. | 01:41:42 | |
| Of the lot itself and is expected to have positive impacts. | 01:41:45 | |
| On neighboring commercial lots. | 01:41:48 | |
| The buffer yard alone. | 01:41:50 | |
| Adjacent residential lots are provided to the West. Additional buffering is recommended for the properties on the South. | 01:41:52 | |
| The rezoning of subject property will support. | 01:41:59 | |
| Responsible growth and development in the area. | 01:42:02 | |
| Rezoning follows the objectives of smart growth outlined in the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 01:42:04 | |
| Higher density development is directed towards existing infrastructure. | 01:42:10 | |
| Provider Provider letters indicate ability to serve the development is in. | 01:42:14 | |
| The identified commercial growth area and is in the infill development. | 01:42:20 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Penny Commission hereby makes a favorable recommendation. | 01:42:24 | |
| On the petitioner zoning. | 01:42:30 | |
| Amendment application at the meeting held on the 10th of February 2025. | 01:42:32 | |
| A favorable recommendation is based on the following written commencement. | 01:42:37 | |
| Buffer Yard 2 standards will be met on all adjoining residential properties. | 01:42:41 | |
| Trick #2 Drainage will be Floyd County storm water standards as approved by the Storm Water Board. | 01:42:46 | |
| #3A phase lot 1 will be developed first and a schedule of completion for the project will be provided by the applicant. | 01:42:52 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 01:42:59 | |
| OK, we have a ballot. I need a second. | 01:43:02 | |
| No second. | 01:43:25 | |
| That I need a ballot. | 01:43:27 | |
| By somebody that's not approving this ballot. | 01:43:29 | |
| You need to fill one out. | 01:43:31 | |
| I can't do it. | 01:43:33 | |
| What was the question? | 01:43:42 | |
| Mr. Vice President. | 01:43:44 | |
| Somebody need somebody will need to complete a ballot. | 01:43:49 | |
| Otherwise you can have discussion on the first one if you want to at this point. | 01:43:58 | |
| Go from there. | 01:44:03 | |
| But. | 01:44:04 | |
| Nations from out for conversations. | 01:44:10 | |
| Yeah. I mean, you guys can discuss it. You can. | 01:44:13 | |
| The only thing that would not require bouts unfavorable recommend or sorry, no recommendation that would not have a ballot with | 01:44:16 | |
| us. | 01:44:19 | |
| It's favorable, unfavorable, or no recommendation. | 01:44:24 | |
| I was listening correct because you wouldn't have a ballot with no recommendation. | 01:44:28 | |
| OK, so somebody makes needs to make a motion. | 01:44:33 | |
| That's the path that somebody wants, OK? | 01:44:36 | |
| So I think once again, that's why we kind of went through and explained so. | 01:44:38 | |
| Obviously, Mr. Bible Hauser has a ballot with a favorable. | 01:44:41 | |
| We either need somebody with an unfavorable or no recommendation at all. | 01:44:45 | |
| Unfavorable takes a ballot. No recommendation would not be a ballot, so no recommendation does not take about. | 01:44:51 | |
| I'll make a motion for no recommendation to the Board Commission. | 01:44:57 | |
| Could place place. Please respect what we're trying to get accomplished here. I beg you. | 01:45:01 | |
| If you cannot be quiet, you need to leave the room please. Thank you. | 01:45:07 | |
| OK, so I have I have a motion for no recommendation correct? | 01:45:11 | |
| I need a second. | 01:45:16 | |
| I need a second. | 01:45:24 | |
| I will second that motion. | 01:45:26 | |
| OK, have a second. | 01:45:27 | |
| Any discussion? | 01:45:29 | |
| Yeah, I'm just not qualified to do this unfavorable ballot. I'm. | 01:45:31 | |
| Totally opposed to this. I don't know why we're making an adjustment to this zoning to our. | 01:45:35 | |
| Residents of that area. | 01:45:40 | |
| But to put me to. | 01:45:46 | |
| Could do this ballot. I'm just not qualified. I mean, it's so detailed, so complex, just what they went through. | 01:45:48 | |
| I think it's a process. OK. So do you want to fill out an unfavorable? | 01:45:55 | |
| Not or you want to vote for. | 01:46:01 | |
| No recommendation. | 01:46:03 | |
| Maybe if we can re. | 01:46:04 | |
| Revisit this another meeting, give me time to prepare for it. That's not possible. We've got three options and we're going to | 01:46:06 | |
| leave the room with 1/3 so. | 01:46:10 | |
| I'm not qualified to do this. | 01:46:13 | |
| Unfavorable. Sort of. | 01:46:17 | |
| I have a motion. I have a second. | 01:46:18 | |
| We had discussion all in favor. | 01:46:20 | |
| Signify for I. | 01:46:22 | |
| Aye, aye. | 01:46:24 | |
| There's three. That's for no recommendation at all. | 01:46:26 | |
| So you had three, so you do not have enough to support a no recommendation. So there needs to be a ballot. | 01:46:31 | |
| That is prepared or a. | 01:46:36 | |
| Vote in favor. You have to have a majority vote. | 01:46:38 | |
| Call again. So no recommendation. | 01:46:45 | |
| Everybody understands what's going on there. That goes to the ministers, they make the decision so. | 01:46:48 | |
| You could make an unfavorable. | 01:46:53 | |
| And vote unanimous. All that still goes to the Commission. | 01:46:55 | |
| Makes the commissioners make the decision so. | 01:46:58 | |
| In order to for us to finish this meeting tonight, we have to have a vote. | 01:47:01 | |
| So can I put it up for one more time? | 01:47:06 | |
| Somebody else can make a motion, yes. | 01:47:09 | |
| Can I review this? I mean how complex is this? | 01:47:12 | |
| I know I'm not qualified, but I mean, can we just put up a? | 01:47:15 | |
| Vote unfavorable how details is going to be you have. | 01:47:19 | |
| Ballot and bring your motion with. | 01:47:22 | |
| Your ballot. | 01:47:25 | |
| But you can take time to fill out and do, but it does. | 01:47:27 | |
| Be brought and then a second to that. | 01:47:29 | |
| Vote on that ballot. | 01:47:32 | |
| Not an answer question. We're we. | 01:47:35 | |
| We're not supposed to answer questions, but hold on a second. | 01:47:52 | |
| Once again, what we're trying to do here is we've got favorable, unfavorable. | 01:47:55 | |
| Or no recommendation. So that's what we're trying to get through right now, so. | 01:47:59 | |
| Let it give us time to get through this place. | 01:48:02 | |
| Yes. All right, I'll make a motion is. | 01:48:06 | |
| I'll make a motion and no recommendation. | 01:48:10 | |
| I'll second. | 01:48:13 | |
| We have a second. | 01:48:15 | |
| Any other discussion? | 01:48:16 | |
| All in favor. | 01:48:18 | |
| For no recommendation signify by aye. | 01:48:19 | |
| Ah, those opposed. | 01:48:23 | |
| All right, all right. | 01:48:24 | |
| OK, so it's two, it passes. | 01:48:26 | |
| Good. Five, Yeah, OK. | 01:48:28 | |
| So it's going to the Commission with no recommendation. So I'll get to visit Michelle. Let me let me show a hands who said yes. | 01:48:30 | |
| No recommendations. No recommendation? Sure. | 01:48:37 | |
| 12345 So we've got enough, correct that is correct. | 01:48:39 | |
| So that passes. | 01:48:44 | |
| OK, so now agenda item. | 01:48:45 | |
| Number. | 01:48:48 | |
| 4/3 right? | 01:48:51 | |
| Excuse me, Sir. What? | 01:48:55 | |
| We all right, go ahead. | 01:48:57 | |
| I'm looking for a ballot. | 01:49:00 | |
| For agenda item number. | 01:49:01 | |
| 433. | 01:49:05 | |
| 3 Umm. | 01:49:07 | |
| Even though we got no recommendation here, you still want to all tied together. That's what I Nick, have you. Yeah. | 01:49:08 | |
| Make a contingent on commissioners approval. | 01:49:20 | |
| Yeah, I mean. | 01:49:22 | |
| Well, the the subdivisions. | 01:49:26 | |
| Ministerial. | 01:49:28 | |
| Correct. | 01:49:29 | |
| So if the Mr. standards, then you. | 01:49:31 | |
| Child permit. So for that work they want to table it. | 01:49:33 | |
| If the applicant wishes to table until commissioners make a decision, otherwise you guys would, it would be up to you and it's | 01:49:39 | |
| ministerial, so if they meet all the requirements it has to be approved. | 01:49:43 | |
| With you can make a condition contingent on the commissioners approval of the rezone, though obviously other than that if they | 01:49:48 | |
| meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance it has to be approved. | 01:49:52 | |
| The question is just do you want to table it until a decision is made by the commissioners or do you want a do you want the board | 01:50:01 | |
| to go ahead and vote on it this evening? | 01:50:05 | |
| OK. | 01:50:09 | |
| So that you guys are left with the ballot for that. | 01:50:10 | |
| Which is agenda item 4 but. | 01:50:15 | |
| Docket ending in 03 is a grant or deny that subdivision. | 01:50:17 | |
| Again, is ministerial in nature as long as they meet the zoning ordinance. | 01:50:21 | |
| With that though, I would. | 01:50:24 | |
| Recommend subject subject to the Commissioners approval. | 01:50:26 | |
| Zoning change which is reference that docket number, I think will be helpful. | 01:50:30 | |
| OK. So just for everybody on the board, if you get a ballot that's in favor of this? | 01:50:34 | |
| We put us, we put a condition on it. | 01:50:39 | |
| That it's subject to the commissioners, correct? So if the commissioners don't approve that, then it would not be approved. All | 01:50:42 | |
| right, so I need, I need a ballot for agenda item item number 4. | 01:50:46 | |
| #4. | 01:50:51 | |
| Well, it's agenda item 4. It's agenda item 4, Docket three. Yeah, Docket 3. | 01:50:54 | |
| Docket FCO 1-25-03. | 01:51:10 | |
| Number one, petitioner has met all the following requirements. | 01:51:16 | |
| So he's met all the requirements for. | 01:51:20 | |
| Preliminary plan provided. | 01:51:24 | |
| Certification demonstrating idem. | 01:51:26 | |
| Platt provided geotechnical report staff. | 01:51:29 | |
| Traffic Study. | 01:51:33 | |
| The lots working. | 01:51:36 | |
| And compliance. | 01:51:38 | |
| The streets. | 01:51:40 | |
| Item I Streets are in compliance. J Sidewalks are in compliance #2 Petitioner has met. | 01:51:41 | |
| The following requirements for drainage and storm water. | 01:51:48 | |
| #3 The petitioner has provided a letter confirming. | 01:51:52 | |
| Confirming availability and willingness to serve for all necessary utilities. Lloyd Water Company, Georgetown Fire Department. | 01:51:56 | |
| Harrison REMC, New Albany Wastewater. | 01:52:04 | |
| At T and Charter. | 01:52:08 | |
| #4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer and or septic. | 01:52:10 | |
| Service for the development we provided by New Albany Wastewater. | 01:52:14 | |
| Decision. | 01:52:22 | |
| Upon careful review, the boy county. | 01:52:25 | |
| Planning Commissioner right grants the petitioner. | 01:52:27 | |
| Primary approval for a major subdivision at the meeting held on the 10th of February 2025. Primary approval is based on completion | 01:52:30 | |
| of fine conditions. | 01:52:35 | |
| Final Approval The drainage stormwater plans are required prior to secondary approval. | 01:52:39 | |
| The number of apartments. | 01:52:45 | |
| For this development shall not exceed 125 units. | 01:52:47 | |
| And this. | 01:52:53 | |
| This approval is subject to. | 01:52:57 | |
| Contingent is contingent upon. | 01:53:00 | |
| The the planning. | 01:53:09 | |
| The commissioners approving the previous one, right? | 01:53:12 | |
| FC is put down FC. | 01:53:16 | |
| This is contingent upon. | 01:53:18 | |
| FC01. | 01:53:20 | |
| I will just hold on there, OK. | 01:53:22 | |
| FCO One. | 01:53:34 | |
| 2502, that's right, yeah. | 01:53:36 | |
| This is contingent upon the Commissioner's approval of FCO 1-25-02 that completes my ballot. | 01:53:41 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. I need a any discussion. | 01:53:49 | |
| I need a second. | 01:53:53 | |
| I'll second. | 01:53:54 | |
| We have a second. All in favor signify by aye. | 01:53:55 | |
| All right, all right, let me see. A show of hands and said aye. | 01:53:59 | |
| OK, let the record show that there was a majority more than 5. | 01:54:03 | |
| That passes. | 01:54:07 | |
| Once again, that is subject to the Commissioners approval. | 01:54:10 | |
| Of the zoning map. | 01:54:12 | |
| All right, you got agenda item number 5. | 01:54:14 | |
| FC-01-25-04. | 01:54:18 | |
| On this one, Nick, this would go from the multifamily to the PUD though, so I think at this time. | 01:54:25 | |
| Would the applicant want to table that one? Because. | 01:54:31 | |
| I mean, it wasn't. | 01:54:35 | |
| Obviously the recommendation. There's no recommendation from. | 01:54:36 | |
| Commercial to multifamily. | 01:54:39 | |
| I still you have 8 will be back in the morning. | 01:54:42 | |
| Unfavorable, OK. | 01:54:47 | |
| OK. All right. | 01:54:49 | |
| All right, so confirming that's OK with you so. | 01:54:51 | |
| Is there any on a body on the board that wants to make no recommendation motion or is there a ballot from somebody? | 01:54:53 | |
| Anybody. | 01:55:02 | |
| Which one is this for? This is the one that. | 01:55:04 | |
| PUD. | 01:55:09 | |
| It's #4. | 01:55:10 | |
| It's it's it's agenda file. | 01:55:14 | |
| So your options again are favorable, unfavorable, both of those require ballots or no recommendation. | 01:55:19 | |
| So, and this is on 04. | 01:55:31 | |
| This is yes. | 01:55:33 | |
| Huh. | 01:55:37 | |
| The first part of this thing. | 01:55:46 | |
| It's all up to you. | 01:55:47 | |
| So all I have to say. | 01:55:49 | |
| Officer, can't we start? | 01:55:51 | |
| Multiple pages in correct? | 01:55:53 | |
| Yes, page 4. | 01:55:55 | |
| All right, all right, That's OK. | 01:56:01 | |
| We have three options. | 01:56:06 | |
| I know the proposed. | 01:56:07 | |
| Planned unit development does very does significantly. | 01:56:10 | |
| Does vary significant from the zoning and subdivision control regulation concerning density, parking and buffering? | 01:56:14 | |
| Yard #1 #2. | 01:56:20 | |
| The closed land use and the. | 01:56:23 | |
| In the planned unit development. | 01:56:25 | |
| Are not in conflict. | 01:56:27 | |
| With spirit and the intent of the comprehensive. | 01:56:29 | |
| Plants surrounding land use and zoning district. | 01:56:32 | |
| #3 the proposed. | 01:56:36 | |
| HUD does provide adequate public service like air traffic control. | 01:56:38 | |
| Open and. | 01:56:44 | |
| Common space and recreation. | 01:56:45 | |
| #4. | 01:56:48 | |
| The planned unit development is compatible with the adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhoods. | 01:56:49 | |
| #5. | 01:56:55 | |
| The proposed planned unit development will not interfere with the use or diminish the values of adjacent properties and | 01:56:56 | |
| surrounding neighborhood. | 01:57:00 | |
| Number six, the proposed planned unit development will not diminish the level of service. | 01:57:04 | |
| For roadway systems in the vicinity. | 01:57:09 | |
| #7. | 01:57:12 | |
| The plan you development can't be immediately and adequately served by existing public facilities. | 01:57:13 | |
| #8. | 01:57:20 | |
| Planned unit development does preserve natural and historic resources to extent possible. | 01:57:21 | |
| #9 The planned unit development will not be interest to the public health and safety and general welfare. | 01:57:27 | |
| #10 The written commitments will be required. The applicant shall provide a schedule for phasing the construction of the project. | 01:57:33 | |
| A schedule for the completion of all phases. | 01:57:37 | |
| We'll provide it to the Planning Commission. | 01:57:42 | |
| #11. | 01:57:44 | |
| The petitioner will be. | 01:57:46 | |
| Required. | 01:57:48 | |
| To meet conditions. | 01:57:49 | |
| Please specify those conditions a the number of apartments of development. | 01:57:51 | |
| Shall not exceed 125 units. | 01:57:56 | |
| Be for secondary approval, provide additional screening of dumpster on. | 01:57:59 | |
| Dumpster. | 01:58:03 | |
| On lot 1 between dumpsters and roadway provided light at entrance. | 01:58:04 | |
| Locations where there are none. | 01:58:10 | |
| Meet suffer buffer zone. | 01:58:12 | |
| Buffer Yard 2 standards. | 01:58:15 | |
| For adjoining residential youth on the South side. | 01:58:17 | |
| With a ball. | 01:58:21 | |
| That completes my appointment. That's not complete my brother. | 01:58:25 | |
| I gotta read something over here. | 01:58:29 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby. | 01:58:31 | |
| Makes a favorable recommendation to the County Commissioner concerning the petitioner planned unit development at the beating held | 01:58:34 | |
| on the 10th of February, 2025. | 01:58:38 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. | 01:58:44 | |
| Any discussion on that ballot? | 01:58:46 | |
| I need a second. | 01:58:48 | |
| I'll second. | 01:58:51 | |
| We do have a second. | 01:58:52 | |
| Any further discussion if none? | 01:58:54 | |
| We need a vote all signify that agreed by aye. | 01:58:57 | |
| Aye. | 01:59:00 | |
| Those opposed. | 01:59:02 | |
| Aye. | 01:59:03 | |
| All right, well, let's say this show of hands and approve it. | 01:59:04 | |
| Which one are you doing? | 01:59:08 | |
| 4. | 01:59:10 | |
| Just making sure I heard you right. | 01:59:11 | |
| 1234. | 01:59:13 | |
| OK. | 01:59:15 | |
| All right. | 01:59:16 | |
| So if we need somebody to do. | 01:59:19 | |
| I will adjust. | 01:59:22 | |
| Ballot. | 01:59:24 | |
| To no recommendation. | 01:59:25 | |
| So you're just bringing a motion for number? Yeah, it's not your ballot. | 01:59:28 | |
| Well, it's on here to 2nd, make no recommendation. | 01:59:31 | |
| Ending ending Commissioner approval. | 01:59:35 | |
| Is is it just no recommendation or is it? | 01:59:40 | |
| Automatically pending Commissioner approval. | 01:59:43 | |
| It goes to commissioners regardless. | 01:59:47 | |
| OK, I'll second that. | 01:59:49 | |
| OK, so we have a motion for. | 01:59:52 | |
| No recommendation. | 01:59:55 | |
| Correct, and you're seconded. | 01:59:57 | |
| Any discussion? | 01:59:59 | |
| OK, all in favor, say bye. | 02:00:01 | |
| Raise hands, please. So we got it on record. | 02:00:03 | |
| OK, we do have 5 or above so that does pass. | 02:00:06 | |
| All right. Thank you. | 02:00:09 | |
| All right, it passes no recommendation. | 02:00:12 | |
| All right, the last. | 02:00:17 | |
| Is agenda item 6. | 02:00:21 | |
| Which is FC. | 02:00:24 | |
| 01 Dash, 2505. | 02:00:25 | |
| I thought that's what we just did. No, I didn't. | 02:00:28 | |
| I don't know if that was the floor. Huh. It was all four. | 02:00:31 | |
| It didn't read. | 02:00:37 | |
| Yeah, 'cause that's. | 02:00:41 | |
| Yeah, that should have signatures. | 02:00:42 | |
| Because that should have that as a no recommendation, shouldn't have signatures on it, right? | 02:00:47 | |
| That one does. | 02:00:53 | |
| Hey, Nick. | 02:00:55 | |
| I'm all confused at this point guys. | 02:00:58 | |
| The 04 ballot has no recommendation but still has a ballot which? | 02:01:02 | |
| Are you OK with that? | 02:01:06 | |
| Yeah. | 02:01:08 | |
| You vote, you voted on it. | 02:01:10 | |
| Recommendation. | 02:01:12 | |
| Do you have, do you have agenda item 5? Is that what you? Yeah, that's fine. That's still fine. | 02:01:15 | |
| You just read Ballot. | 02:01:22 | |
| Agenda item. | 02:01:26 | |
| Agenda item 5 + 4. | 02:01:28 | |
| Gotcha. OK. That was the one you just read. | 02:01:30 | |
| You read it. | 02:01:33 | |
| Where's it at? | 02:01:35 | |
| That's when we just. That's what I just read. | 02:01:37 | |
| Yeah, I don't think that's right. I'm confused. | 02:01:41 | |
| Nick, you want help a second. | 02:01:43 | |
| You skipped. | 02:01:49 | |
| Is this right? | 02:01:51 | |
| You have the first 3. | 02:01:54 | |
| Here we go, you're saying? | 02:01:57 | |
| You want an 05 now, right? Correct. | 02:01:59 | |
| That's the one we're on now. | 02:02:01 | |
| We have to. | 02:02:07 | |
| Did we approve this one? | 02:02:09 | |
| OK, so we're on. | 02:02:11 | |
| That's right. | 02:02:23 | |
| Do we need to finish signing that? | 02:02:26 | |
| I need it and I'll move it on. | 02:02:30 | |
| OK. All right. | 02:02:35 | |
| So, so Nick on this development plan, I mean, if we're voting no recommendation on. | 02:02:36 | |
| O2 and 04. | 02:02:40 | |
| How? How do we How do we vote on it? | 02:02:41 | |
| On both O2. | 02:02:45 | |
| That's right. | 02:02:47 | |
| Yeah, I got a sign. | 02:02:49 | |
| I bet so that's good. | 02:02:52 | |
| That's alright, you got it. I'm. | 02:02:57 | |
| Hey, I'm good. | 02:03:01 | |
| How do I know what I'm saying? | 02:03:02 | |
| OK, the next we need a ballot for agenda item 6. | 02:03:12 | |
| 05. | 02:03:17 | |
| FC-O125-505. | 02:03:18 | |
| No, I just making sure that. | 02:03:24 | |
| Where's my wife? | 02:03:42 | |
| You guys. | 02:03:48 | |
| This will be. | 02:03:51 | |
| Subject to FC 01. | 02:03:52 | |
| 25. | 02:03:56 | |
| Dash O2. | 02:03:58 | |
| And 04104 1. | 02:04:01 | |
| That's it, You got it. | 02:04:11 | |
| And I still need some. | 02:04:13 | |
| All right, do we have a ballot for Docket FCO 1-25-O5? | 02:04:17 | |
| Conceptual site plan. | 02:04:25 | |
| Review by planning director Yes. | 02:04:27 | |
| Findings #1 Petitioner has met all the veterans standards. | 02:04:29 | |
| For the district #2A waiver for the development standard. | 02:04:33 | |
| Requirement is not required. | 02:04:37 | |
| #3. | 02:04:39 | |
| Proposed development plan is consistent with the Comprehensive plan because the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan identifies the | 02:04:41 | |
| area as a commercial growth area. | 02:04:45 | |
| The proposed planned unit development be mixed-use featuring a commercial element nearest the frontage additional rezoning | 02:04:50 | |
| assistant with the smart growth principles. | 02:04:54 | |
| Identified in the plan, specifically mixed land use. | 02:04:59 | |
| Compact building design, creating a range of housing opportunities, directing development towards existing communities and | 02:05:02 | |
| preserving open space. | 02:05:06 | |
| And critical environmental areas as this is an infill development. | 02:05:11 | |
| #4 The proposed development is consistent with the intent. | 02:05:15 | |
| Of the district has set forth in Boyd County zoning ordinance because it is a multi family planned unit development district. | 02:05:19 | |
| District which allows modifications to underlying district. | 02:05:26 | |
| Standards #4 the proposed development plan. | 02:05:29 | |
| Does satisfy. | 02:05:32 | |
| The following development. | 02:05:33 | |
| Requirements. | 02:05:35 | |
| And there are. | 02:05:36 | |
| A is signage, B is access, C is designed D lighting. | 02:05:37 | |
| Number six, the proposed development is a multi family development development plan does satisfy the requirements for a | 02:05:43 | |
| recreational space and open space by providing a pool and outdoor gaming area. | 02:05:49 | |
| And is less than the 25 acres in Toll area. | 02:05:55 | |
| #7 The proposed developments is located in the Highlander Point District. | 02:05:58 | |
| The following requirements have been met. Building facades or brick. | 02:06:02 | |
| And Harding board there are no loading docks, burden dumpsters located to the side and rear of the buildings. | 02:06:06 | |
| A The building facades that face any adjacent streets have a finished facade. | 02:06:12 | |
| Be loading docks and trash collector bins are not placed on or along the facade that face. | 02:06:17 | |
| Any adjacent streets? | 02:06:22 | |
| See the accommodation is. | 02:06:25 | |
| Is made for community space where a proposal commercial development. | 02:06:27 | |
| Has over 100,000 square feet. | 02:06:32 | |
| Either in combination of buildings or lots and is. | 02:06:34 | |
| A cohesive commercial project or development D. | 02:06:38 | |
| Open space requirements for Section 904. The Fern. | 02:06:41 | |
| Zoning ordinance are met. | 02:06:44 | |
| Decision. This decision is contingent upon Commissioners approval. | 02:06:46 | |
| Of SCO 12502 and FCO 1/25/04. | 02:06:50 | |
| One careful review. The Floyd County Planning Commission hereby approves. | 02:06:54 | |
| The Petition Development Plan review application at the meeting held on the 10th of February 2025. | 02:06:58 | |
| Completes my ballot. | 02:07:04 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. Everybody understands the conditions written on the ballot. | 02:07:06 | |
| I need a second. | 02:07:10 | |
| All right, I've got a second. | 02:07:14 | |
| I would like to. | 02:07:18 | |
| Note that. | 02:07:19 | |
| This detailed improvement detailed. | 02:07:21 | |
| Plan would be contingent upon the rezoning. | 02:07:25 | |
| He said that. | 02:07:29 | |
| Not only as a condition, but as a matter of. | 02:07:31 | |
| Whether it is valid or not. | 02:07:34 | |
| That's why I made a second. | 02:07:37 | |
| There you go. So I have I do have a a second. | 02:07:40 | |
| OK. | 02:07:43 | |
| All right, all in favor signify by aye. | 02:07:46 | |
| Aye, show of hands please, on the eyes. | 02:07:49 | |
| OK, that is. | 02:07:52 | |
| A majority. So that passes. Thank you, Larry. | 02:07:53 | |
| All righty, Nick. | 02:07:57 | |
| Includes the. | 02:07:58 | |
| Agenda items other than we had something on here about the overlay. | 02:08:00 | |
| Can we, can we push, push that down the road? | 02:08:04 | |
| Please I need to. | 02:08:07 | |
| I really need to. | 02:08:10 | |
| I need to. I gotta be honest with you. | 02:08:12 | |
| OK, OK, let's get these signed before we adjourn. | 02:08:16 | |
| Because that is. | 02:08:19 | |
| That is no old business, new business. | 02:08:21 | |
| Complete for tonight. | 02:08:24 | |
| Appreciate advice, patience. | 02:08:26 | |
| Need a motion for adjourned. Yeah, don't, don't leave till you sign though. I need a motion to adjourn motion. | 02:08:29 | |
| OK, any a second so moved. | 02:08:34 | |
| Favor signify by. | 02:08:37 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. | 02:08:39 | |
| Oh. | 02:08:44 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Document list
| Document Name | Document type | |
|---|---|---|
| FC-01-25-05 - Thieneman- Development Plan | General Document | |
| FC-01-25-04 - Thieneman - PUD | General Document | |
| FC-01-25-03 - Thieneman- Knobs Landing Subdivision | General Document | |
| FC-01-25-02 - Thieneman- Rezone | General Document | |
| FC-01-25-01 - ASB- Administrative Subdivision | General Document |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| At this time, I'd like to call to order the February 10th the Floyd County Planning Commission. At this time, we'd like to stand | 00:00:13 | |
| and honor our flag, please. | 00:00:17 | |
| United States of America. | 00:00:23 | |
| And to Republic, for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. | 00:00:26 | |
| OK, at this time I'd like to have a roll call. | 00:00:36 | |
| Here. | 00:00:39 | |
| Present. | 00:00:44 | |
| Yeah. | 00:00:46 | |
| Here. | 00:00:47 | |
| Here. | 00:00:50 | |
| Here. | 00:00:51 | |
| Here. | 00:00:53 | |
| Alrighty, one shorter board member. That's eight of us, correct? | 00:00:55 | |
| All right. | 00:00:58 | |
| At this time. | 00:01:01 | |
| We'd like to have the minutes of the December. | 00:01:03 | |
| Fruit. I'm going to take a look at those and make a motion. | 00:01:07 | |
| I make a motion that we approve the December Planning Commission. | 00:01:15 | |
| Minutes. All right. Thank you. I have a. | 00:01:18 | |
| Motion any second. | 00:01:21 | |
| Awesome. Go ahead. | 00:01:24 | |
| I got a second, but John any. | 00:01:25 | |
| Conversation. | 00:01:27 | |
| Discussion. | 00:01:29 | |
| At that time, we take a motion all in favor. | 00:01:30 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. Thank you. Approved. Thank you. | 00:01:33 | |
| All righty. We have no old business. Is that correct, Nick? | 00:01:36 | |
| OK, this time we'd like to agenda number item number one, we have have to have the election of officers. | 00:01:42 | |
| And at this time, we need some recommendation emotions. | 00:01:49 | |
| I nominate Mr. Hunter for the president. | 00:01:54 | |
| All right, we got a motion for president. We need a second. | 00:01:57 | |
| Second. All right, we've got a second all in favor. | 00:02:00 | |
| Aye, those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:02:03 | |
| All right, now we need somebody for Vice President. | 00:02:06 | |
| Needed somebody to. | 00:02:09 | |
| Volunteer piece. | 00:02:11 | |
| For a motion or a motion, there you go. Make somebody make a motion. That'll work. | 00:02:16 | |
| Frank, are you willing to do it? | 00:02:22 | |
| Take care. All right, so somebody needs to make a motion for Frank. | 00:02:26 | |
| I'll make a motion, Frank. | 00:02:29 | |
| For vice president. | 00:02:31 | |
| All right, we have a motion a second all any discussion? | 00:02:33 | |
| All in favor signify by. | 00:02:37 | |
| Those opposed likewise. All right. Thanks. Thanks a lot. | 00:02:39 | |
| All right. Next thing is the plant review committee. | 00:02:42 | |
| Right now I've show that's Larry. | 00:02:46 | |
| Chris Welch, Gina. | 00:02:48 | |
| John Brankworth and myself as everybody still willing to serve. | 00:02:50 | |
| I am OK Larry is John. | 00:02:54 | |
| Gina and we called Chris and I'm willing to do that. So that takes care of that, OK? | 00:02:58 | |
| All right. Next Adam is the Adam agenda item number two, FC-01. | 00:03:03 | |
| Hold on. So you guys need to vote on that. | 00:03:08 | |
| On which someone on the plant review, so I'm sorry, we need a vote on the plant review. So I need a motion to accept those 5 | 00:03:10 | |
| members. | 00:03:13 | |
| Make a motion. All right, we have a motion. I need a second. | 00:03:18 | |
| All right, all in favor signify by. | 00:03:22 | |
| Likewise opposed. Thank you all right now. | 00:03:24 | |
| All right. Now we're going to go to agenda item number 2. | 00:03:29 | |
| FC-01-25-01, Administrative Subdivision. | 00:03:32 | |
| Nick will give us his staff report. | 00:03:37 | |
| This is an. | 00:03:40 | |
| Minor subdivision application for four lot subdivision. The petitioner is ASB LLC. The zoning district is agricultural | 00:03:41 | |
| residential. | 00:03:45 | |
| They are requesting A4 lot subdivision with frontage on Nippleton Road. | 00:03:50 | |
| The property currently has a home and two barns on it. | 00:03:54 | |
| There is an identified floodway and floodway fringe on the South and. | 00:03:58 | |
| Side of the property. | 00:04:01 | |
| The plaque committee for this was cancelled due to a lack of quorum. | 00:04:03 | |
| Staff comments is that the plat as submitted does comply with lot size standards. Lots are minimum of two acres with 100 foot. | 00:04:07 | |
| Road frontage plate I submitted does comply with streets. | 00:04:15 | |
| Standards There are no new streets provided. The plat as submitted does comply with easement standards with conditions. | 00:04:19 | |
| Stated below, the driveway easements are needed. | 00:04:25 | |
| For every two lots, one driveway easement is required. | 00:04:30 | |
| Unless that requirement is waived by the. | 00:04:34 | |
| Flat as submitted does comply with the block standards. There are no blocks proposed. | 00:04:38 | |
| The plat as submitted does provide St. improvements as required. Again, no streets proposed. | 00:04:44 | |
| The plat, as submitted does comply with Water Supply Standards Board and tri-county Regional Water has provided a service letter | 00:04:51 | |
| for the new lots. | 00:04:55 | |
| 3 inch inch line is available for service. | 00:04:59 | |
| This line is not adequate to provide Fire Protection. | 00:05:02 | |
| The plot as submitted is suitable for sewage and wastewater containment because they have soil provided soil testing. | 00:05:07 | |
| And has been completed by the Floyd County Health Department. | 00:05:14 | |
| Reviewed in by the Floyd County Health Department and provided septic system requirements for suitable systems. | 00:05:19 | |
| Staff Recommendations. | 00:05:26 | |
| Would be to require joint driveways. | 00:05:28 | |
| In easements to be added to the plat for lots. | 00:05:31 | |
| I believe we said it was one and two, unless that is waived by the Planning Commission. | 00:05:37 | |
| Add note on. | 00:05:42 | |
| Flat that prior to development, the Owner shall consult with Highlander Fire Protection District. | 00:05:44 | |
| On driveway placement. | 00:05:50 | |
| All right. That's our staff reporting by having questions for Nick at this time on the board. | 00:05:53 | |
| None. All righty. Thank you, Nick. | 00:06:01 | |
| OK, at this time we'd like to call the applicant to come. | 00:06:04 | |
| Forward and presenter. | 00:06:06 | |
| Good evening. State your name and address. Yes, Sir. Brad Benson with ASB 720 Rolling Creek. | 00:06:10 | |
| Drive the Ste. 106 in New Albany. | 00:06:16 | |
| I know you all have blacks in your file there, but I've got a couple bigger ones if anyone would like. | 00:06:19 | |
| You want to walk on. | 00:06:24 | |
| Not a problem. | 00:06:25 | |
| Yes, please. | 00:06:29 | |
| So the staff report pretty much. | 00:06:41 | |
| Pretty clear on what it is. It's a 20 acre parcel located at 688. | 00:06:44 | |
| 0 Mapleton Rd. | 00:06:48 | |
| It is a R. | 00:06:50 | |
| The tracks are. | 00:06:51 | |
| For Track 1 is five acres, Track 2 is five acres, Track 3 is 2 acres. | 00:06:53 | |
| Track 3 is the one with the house on it that will remain. | 00:06:59 | |
| Track 4 is the 8 acre parcel. | 00:07:02 | |
| He's correct on the ordinance allows for. | 00:07:06 | |
| A minimum of two acre lots, so it applies with that. The road frontage is 100 square or 100 feet. | 00:07:09 | |
| So we could play with that. | 00:07:15 | |
| One element that he did say that. | 00:07:16 | |
| It does not meet. | 00:07:18 | |
| The board has. | 00:07:20 | |
| So the Commission has the ability to. | 00:07:22 | |
| Waive the right for an access easement between these lots. | 00:07:24 | |
| We would ask that that be waived for all four parcels. | 00:07:28 | |
| Track 3 already has a house on it. Our goal with this is that we're not. There's no plans for this right now. We're going to let | 00:07:33 | |
| it sit. | 00:07:36 | |
| May list it and sell it and let somebody out. | 00:07:40 | |
| Build a house on it. We are home builder so hopefully it's us. | 00:07:42 | |
| We may end up holding. | 00:07:45 | |
| Family member, but right now there's no plans. | 00:07:47 | |
| So with these big, Big Lots, we're hoping that you know you're. | 00:07:51 | |
| State style houses big, lots big. | 00:07:55 | |
| You know, big entrance in there. | 00:07:58 | |
| If the Commission were to require a. | 00:08:00 | |
| The access easement. | 00:08:03 | |
| I would ask that it only be on. | 00:08:05 | |
| Lots 1 and 2. | 00:08:07 | |
| Those are the two bigger ones on the. | 00:08:09 | |
| If you're looking at the fly on the bottom side. | 00:08:11 | |
| It's only because lot 3 already has a drive. | 00:08:14 | |
| Lot 4 would then be a separate drive as well. | 00:08:17 | |
| If that is not an option and Commission would require the. | 00:08:21 | |
| Access easements on all of them. | 00:08:26 | |
| Then I would ask that the approval tonight be conditioned upon us supplying those. | 00:08:28 | |
| I believe it's 50 feet wide along those property lines. | 00:08:33 | |
| And we'll submit that proper paperwork. | 00:08:37 | |
| For Nick for approval. | 00:08:39 | |
| So just to clarify real quick on the excess easements. | 00:08:40 | |
| Are they are they not using the road frontage to access their properties or will they need to go across the other tracks? No they | 00:08:46 | |
| will. They all have proper Rd. frontage along Naples and road. So our hope would be that we would have drives off of Napleton. | 00:08:52 | |
| That would not be able to. | 00:08:58 | |
| Access easement will not be needed. | 00:09:00 | |
| So you still got these the site provisions for one for #1 Yes, there is. So the minimum is 100 feet and. | 00:09:04 | |
| There's 100 on all. | 00:09:13 | |
| Yeah. | 00:09:18 | |
| Fall from there and Associates, 301 E Chestnut St. Court in Indiana. | 00:09:21 | |
| Your administrative subdivision requirements have have a have a requirement for joint driveways for every two lots. That's what | 00:09:24 | |
| Mr. Benson is describing. | 00:09:28 | |
| I understand the limit the need is to limit access to county roads. | 00:09:34 | |
| But when you have Big Lots like this, especially one that has an existing House of drive, it makes it difficult to Co locate those | 00:09:38 | |
| drives. | 00:09:42 | |
| And even though the ordinance requires it, it still creates a maintenance problem. | 00:09:46 | |
| Because you have two homeowners fighting over. | 00:09:49 | |
| Who's going to maintain that joint driveway? | 00:09:51 | |
| It's it's in my opinion to everyone's best interest to separate those travelers. | 00:09:53 | |
| OK. Any other questions? | 00:10:00 | |
| None. | 00:10:05 | |
| All right. At this time, we'd like to open up to anybody that like to speak in favor of this project. | 00:10:06 | |
| Come forward now. State your name and your address for the record. | 00:10:13 | |
| See that there's none stepping forward. | 00:10:19 | |
| Now we open up to those who want to oppose. Are you come in favor, Sir? | 00:10:21 | |
| OK, OK. Well. | 00:10:26 | |
| Yeah, anybody wants coming against it, coming forward. | 00:10:28 | |
| State your name and your address for the record please. | 00:10:31 | |
| James White. | 00:10:38 | |
| Everybody got that gotcha. | 00:10:39 | |
| OK, I live at 314 Tuscany Drive. | 00:10:41 | |
| And if they open all that up there and that's going to open our street up to. | 00:10:44 | |
| Them coming more traffic down through there, right? | 00:10:50 | |
| Sir, I think you're about the wrong. You're on the wrong project. Sir, this is on Napleton Road. | 00:10:53 | |
| I'm sorry. | 00:10:57 | |
| You're in the right church, Wrong Pew. | 00:10:59 | |
| All right, so. | 00:11:05 | |
| You he got a jump on you guys. | 00:11:09 | |
| All right, at this time everybody will speak in opposition. | 00:11:13 | |
| To the administrative subdivision. | 00:11:17 | |
| On naval Tarot come forward, state your name and address. | 00:11:20 | |
| Mike Gatton. I live at 6975 Napleton Rd. | 00:11:24 | |
| And my property overlooks this property. | 00:11:27 | |
| And. | 00:11:31 | |
| The traffic is already bad due to Cutter Smith woodworking. | 00:11:32 | |
| Huber's all that and to divide this out and put four more houses on there. | 00:11:36 | |
| Just opens it up for more development and. | 00:11:42 | |
| There's a second. | 00:11:44 | |
| Lot that is not involved in this to the left of it and it's going to open that up for more development. | 00:11:45 | |
| We moved out there to be in the county. I've lived there 23 years. We don't want to be in the city. | 00:11:52 | |
| The traffic, The busing. | 00:11:56 | |
| School buses, things like that. | 00:11:58 | |
| The trucks it's already bad enough we. | 00:12:01 | |
| Preferred the county to state county. | 00:12:03 | |
| That's why we're there. | 00:12:06 | |
| Thank you. | 00:12:09 | |
| Have some more time for anybody else to come forward. State your name and address for the record. | 00:12:14 | |
| And take the films. | 00:12:20 | |
| And I live at 7200 Mableton Rd. | 00:12:22 | |
| Our property also looks through. | 00:12:25 | |
| Mr. loops backyard. | 00:12:27 | |
| Over to this property. | 00:12:29 | |
| Like he said, the traffic is already so terrible. We have. | 00:12:31 | |
| Multiple wrecks with semis on. | 00:12:35 | |
| Our Rd. every year that drive off the roads hit trees. | 00:12:37 | |
| It is. | 00:12:42 | |
| So busy. | 00:12:43 | |
| Adding this is. | 00:12:44 | |
| Taking away all of our country, all of our farmland. | 00:12:46 | |
| I I had somebody build a house behind me a couple years ago and I now have no deer in my yard. I mean like there's literally no | 00:12:50 | |
| wildlife except for comedies. If anybody knows about my coyote issue, but. | 00:12:56 | |
| There is. | 00:13:01 | |
| Like nothing coming in our property more because everybody's building and scaring them out and. | 00:13:02 | |
| That's why we moved there. We moved to begin the country. We have farm animals. | 00:13:07 | |
| And dogs and. | 00:13:11 | |
| Horses and goats, and that's what we moved there for and. | 00:13:13 | |
| I mean you all all moved out there for the same reason. I know where most of you live and you move to those areas for. | 00:13:16 | |
| That in. | 00:13:22 | |
| You're turning it around. There's another piece of land. | 00:13:23 | |
| I know the same person bought on Ableton road and if you all approve this. | 00:13:26 | |
| It's just gonna turn around and get approved for him as well, and that's. | 00:13:30 | |
| Down by the cows. | 00:13:33 | |
| So like, that's our landmarks. We turn at the cows you go to. | 00:13:35 | |
| This farm and that farm and you're just turning it away. | 00:13:39 | |
| Everybody asked me every day. | 00:13:43 | |
| Do you know anybody that has 5 acres for sale? | 00:13:44 | |
| No, because somebody buys it and puts a whole bunch of houses on it. | 00:13:47 | |
| That's not what we want. | 00:13:51 | |
| So just consider that. | 00:13:52 | |
| Thank you. | 00:13:54 | |
| Good evening, Troy Durham. | 00:14:03 | |
| 7222 Napleton Rd. | 00:14:05 | |
| I'm also as a crow flies less than a mile from this development potential development. | 00:14:07 | |
| I don't chagrin anybody for China. | 00:14:12 | |
| Exercise their free enterprise and do business as they see fit. They have the freedom to do it. | 00:14:14 | |
| My two cents as much like these other people who spoke. | 00:14:20 | |
| It's too crowded on the road. It's too busy. | 00:14:24 | |
| And uh, uh. | 00:14:26 | |
| To be frank. | 00:14:28 | |
| I don't like the discomfort I already have fearing for my. | 00:14:29 | |
| Home and those within it from vehicle. | 00:14:33 | |
| Thanks. We've had semis in our front yard. | 00:14:36 | |
| In the past. | 00:14:38 | |
| And I just think it's too much on the road. | 00:14:41 | |
| Too much development. | 00:14:43 | |
| This would maybe be a domino. | 00:14:44 | |
| Of continuing the domino effect of what's already happened with the. | 00:14:46 | |
| Development further out to the county. | 00:14:50 | |
| I don't wish to see it. | 00:14:52 | |
| For my $0.02. | 00:14:54 | |
| And where I lived. | 00:14:56 | |
| And chose to live. | 00:14:57 | |
| For rural reasons. | 00:14:59 | |
| There's something. | 00:15:00 | |
| Alluring to being out in the country. | 00:15:01 | |
| And I think that would be spoiled. | 00:15:03 | |
| Thank you very much. Thank you. | 00:15:05 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:15:08 | |
| All right, at this time we get. | 00:15:12 | |
| Nobody else in opposition. We open the floor back to the petitioner to rebut. | 00:15:15 | |
| Anything that was discussed. | 00:15:19 | |
| Thank you. I'll make it short here. The only thing I would like to point out is we are this is administrative flat. | 00:15:23 | |
| We comply with the ordinance. The only issue would be the access easement. | 00:15:29 | |
| I said I would ask that you waive that right here because of what we're trying to do with this. | 00:15:34 | |
| We are not looking to divide this property. It is an AR which is a. | 00:15:39 | |
| Two acre lot minimum. | 00:15:42 | |
| So hypothetically we get coming forth with a plat for 9 acres in that zone. | 00:15:44 | |
| We're not looking to do that. | 00:15:49 | |
| Worth looking just for four. | 00:15:50 | |
| They're Big Lots, A2 acre. The smallest one is one with the house on it. They'll remain. | 00:15:52 | |
| And then the 55 naked SO. | 00:15:57 | |
| All right. Thank you. | 00:15:59 | |
| At this point where we looking for a ballot? | 00:16:03 | |
| I have a ballot. | 00:16:07 | |
| Subdivision named Ableton Place DACA. | 00:16:08 | |
| FC 01/25/01. | 00:16:11 | |
| After careful review, the fact committee finds that one. | 00:16:15 | |
| Plant as submitted does comply with the lot size standards. | 00:16:18 | |
| Because the new lights are all a minimum of two acres with more than 100. | 00:16:22 | |
| Foot of Rd. frontage #2. | 00:16:26 | |
| The plan has submitted does comply with the street design standards. | 00:16:29 | |
| Because no streets, no new streets are proposed. | 00:16:33 | |
| #3. | 00:16:36 | |
| The plan has submitted does comply with the easement standards because with the conditions below, driveway easements. | 00:16:37 | |
| Or required. | 00:16:43 | |
| #4 the plat as submitted does comply with the block standards. | 00:16:45 | |
| Because there are no blocks required or proposed. | 00:16:48 | |
| #5 the plat as submitted does. | 00:16:52 | |
| Provide St. and. | 00:16:55 | |
| Improvements as required by the ordinance. There are no new streets provided. | 00:16:56 | |
| Number six, the Plat as submitted does comply with the water supply standards because. | 00:17:01 | |
| Board and Tri Water Regional. | 00:17:06 | |
| Water has provided a service letter for the new. | 00:17:09 | |
| Lots. A three inch line is available for service. Note this line is not adequate for bad Fire Protection. | 00:17:13 | |
| #7 the plat as submitted is suitable. | 00:17:19 | |
| Pursuage and wastewater contain. | 00:17:21 | |
| Containment because soil testing has been completed. | 00:17:24 | |
| And Floyd County Health Department has provided septic system requirements for suitable systems. | 00:17:27 | |
| The plant is accepted upon completion of the following condition at a joint driveway and easement to the plat for Lots 1 and 2. | 00:17:33 | |
| Adding note to the plat. | 00:17:40 | |
| That states the following. Prior to development, the owners shall consult the Highlander Fire Protection District for Fire | 00:17:41 | |
| Protection requirements. | 00:17:45 | |
| Due to the lack of adequate water supply. | 00:17:48 | |
| Decision the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby grants the. | 00:17:51 | |
| Primary approval. | 00:17:55 | |
| For this administrative subdivision at the meeting held on the 10th of February, 2025. | 00:17:56 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 00:18:02 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. We're looking for a second. | 00:18:04 | |
| I'll second. We have a second. | 00:18:09 | |
| All in favor signify any discussion. Any discussion. | 00:18:11 | |
| Any discussion? | 00:18:15 | |
| All in favor signify by aye aye, those opposed likewise. | 00:18:17 | |
| It passes. Thank you. | 00:18:22 | |
| Did they sign down? | 00:18:31 | |
| OK, at this time we like to move to Well, first of all, we want to ask the petitioner. | 00:18:34 | |
| If they're OK with us putting. | 00:18:40 | |
| Agenda items 3 through 6 and hearing them at the same time. | 00:18:43 | |
| Mr. Craft, you OK with that? | 00:18:47 | |
| All right. | 00:18:50 | |
| Yes, separate ballots on everyone. Yes, Sir. | 00:18:52 | |
| OK. OK. At this time, we'd like to ask Nick Creeby. | 00:18:55 | |
| I'm a non voting member but I'll be recused recusing myself for the rest of the meeting. All right, thank you. | 00:19:00 | |
| At this time, they could give a staff report. | 00:19:09 | |
| So this is for docket items number FCO 1/25/02. | 00:19:13 | |
| CO125. | 00:19:18 | |
| Three FC 24. | 00:19:20 | |
| 504. | 00:19:23 | |
| In FC. | 00:19:27 | |
| 1/25/05. | 00:19:31 | |
| Petitioner Here's the Thing Group LLC. The location is 5031 through 5053 Old Vincent's Road. | 00:19:38 | |
| The requests are for a zoning map amendment. | 00:19:45 | |
| A major subdivision. | 00:19:50 | |
| A PUD map amendment. | 00:19:53 | |
| In detailed development. | 00:19:56 | |
| They are all pertaining to the same project. | 00:19:59 | |
| The current zoning is for general commercial. | 00:20:03 | |
| Underlying zoning request is for multi family and then a multi family PUD. | 00:20:07 | |
| The petitioner is seeking a planned unit development for mixed-use, multi family residential and commercial use. | 00:20:13 | |
| This proposal will consolidate 4 parcels into two building lots, 3 points 64 and 2.334 acres. | 00:20:19 | |
| The lots will be separated by through St. known as Knobs Landing Blvd. | 00:20:28 | |
| Connecting Tuscany Drive in Trevor Rd. | 00:20:33 | |
| Lot 1 will front will Vincennes Road and is the larger lot and will include two building. | 00:20:36 | |
| Two buildings, A mixed-use commercial multifamily building. Building 1. | 00:20:42 | |
| In a separate standalone commercial. | 00:20:46 | |
| Retail building with drive through. | 00:20:49 | |
| Which is proposed bank building 3 threes. | 00:20:51 | |
| Lot 2 will have a single multi family building. | 00:20:54 | |
| In a building 2. | 00:20:58 | |
| Building 1 at the north of the property in the fronting Old Vincennes Rd. | 00:21:00 | |
| Will be a three story structure with the ground floor area of 25,092 square feet. | 00:21:05 | |
| The building will include 7717 square foot of commercial retail space. | 00:21:11 | |
| Clubhouse leasing office. | 00:21:17 | |
| And 59 multifamily units, 21 of those will be two-bedroom, 38 one bedroom. | 00:21:19 | |
| Building 3 at the east side of the property will be near the corner of Shriver and Old Vincent's. | 00:21:26 | |
| It will be a thirty 3600 square foot retail building with drive through that is the proposed bank. | 00:21:31 | |
| Building 2, located at the South of the property on Lot 2, will be a three story multi family structure with ground floor area of | 00:21:40 | |
| 23,679 square feet and 66 units. | 00:21:46 | |
| The property will also have. | 00:21:52 | |
| Pool and outdoor recreation games area. | 00:21:54 | |
| Neat foot masonry wall. | 00:21:57 | |
| We'll buffer the residents on the West side of the development. | 00:22:00 | |
| Villas of Floyd's knives. | 00:22:03 | |
| Adjoining properties to the West. | 00:22:05 | |
| Is the residential urban zone subdivision buildings of Floyd's Knobs to northwest across Tuscany. Dr. is a vacant general | 00:22:07 | |
| commercial property. | 00:22:12 | |
| Across Old Vincennes Road to the north is undeveloped general commercial. | 00:22:16 | |
| To the northeast is Highlander Point development. | 00:22:20 | |
| General commercial zoned. | 00:22:23 | |
| The East Across River Rd. is general commercial. | 00:22:26 | |
| To the South is residentially urban zone property with two acre single family lot. | 00:22:29 | |
| In small section of the Highland subdivision. | 00:22:34 | |
| Which is residential urban. | 00:22:37 | |
| The current base zone for the proposal is general commercial. | 00:22:39 | |
| Commercial. | 00:22:43 | |
| Part of Floyd County Zoning Ordinance Section 7.04 GA Base Commercial Zone may not designate more than 30% of the proposed | 00:22:44 | |
| development per square footage for residential. | 00:22:49 | |
| Therefore the applicant is requesting the base zone be changed to multi family. | 00:22:55 | |
| A traffic impact study was conducted for the proposal and determined that the intersections impacted by the development. | 00:23:01 | |
| Will continue to work at an acceptable level of service. | 00:23:07 | |
| Technical Review Committee was held on December 18th, 2024 for this development. | 00:23:17 | |
| Summary report was attached to your staff report. | 00:23:23 | |
| The technical review committee provides. | 00:23:27 | |
| Recommendations to the Planning Commission. | 00:23:30 | |
| On that. | 00:23:33 | |
| Are the utility providers. | 00:23:34 | |
| Public Safety. Sheriff Fire. | 00:23:37 | |
| School. | 00:23:40 | |
| As well as county staff, storm water engineering and planning. | 00:23:42 | |
| The reason? Staff finds that the rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:23:47 | |
| Because the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan identifies the area as a commercial growth area. | 00:23:54 | |
| Proposed. | 00:23:59 | |
| The mixed-use featuring a commercial element yours to the frontage. | 00:24:00 | |
| Additionally, rezoning is consistent with smart growth principles identified in the plan. Specifically mixed land uses compact | 00:24:04 | |
| building design. | 00:24:08 | |
| Creating a range of housing opportunities, directing development towards existing communities and preferring. | 00:24:12 | |
| And thus preserving open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas. | 00:24:18 | |
| As this is an infill development. | 00:24:23 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is consistent with the. | 00:24:27 | |
| Conditions of the character of the current structures in the. | 00:24:30 | |
| And uses in the area. | 00:24:34 | |
| Because the commercial use is in the front of the lot are consistent with the original general commercial zoning. | 00:24:36 | |
| The multifamily uses our appropriate transitional uses between general commercial and urban residential uses. | 00:24:42 | |
| Voting facade materials are brick and Hardy board. | 00:24:48 | |
| The structures are within the height limits of the zoning ordinance. And there are. | 00:24:52 | |
| There is another three story building in the vicinity that is the Chase Bank. | 00:24:56 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of. | 00:25:01 | |
| The land because. | 00:25:06 | |
| The rezoning follows smart growth principles already noted. | 00:25:08 | |
| It has also provided. | 00:25:12 | |
| Additional housing identified as needed in the Purdue Housing Report the county had completed in 2020. | 00:25:14 | |
| It is mixed-use infill in commercial growth area. | 00:25:20 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will not be interest to the values of other properties in the area because. | 00:25:24 | |
| Commercial uses are consistent with the neighborhood commercial zoning. | 00:25:30 | |
| Excuse me? | 00:25:34 | |
| The general commercial zoning. | 00:25:35 | |
| Inappropriate adjacent and residential urban zoning. | 00:25:38 | |
| And uses the addition of the multifamily component. | 00:25:41 | |
| Will support local business customer base. The development will increase the value of the lots itself and expected that positive | 00:25:44 | |
| impacts on neighboring commercial lots. | 00:25:48 | |
| Buffer yard. | 00:25:53 | |
| Along adjacent residential lots is provided on the West. Additional buffering is recommended for the properties on the South. | 00:25:54 | |
| The rezoning of the subject property will support responsible growth and development in the area. | 00:26:03 | |
| Because rezoning follows the objectives of small smart growth outlined in the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 00:26:08 | |
| Higher development is directed towards existing infrastructure. | 00:26:15 | |
| Provider letters indicate ability to serve and the development is identified. Commercial growth area. | 00:26:18 | |
| It is an infill development staff has favorable recommendations for the reason. | 00:26:24 | |
| Written commitments recommended would be buffer yard 2 standards met. | 00:26:30 | |
| For all adjoining residents. | 00:26:34 | |
| Drainage will meet Floyd County stormwater standards as approved by the Stormwater Board. | 00:26:37 | |
| And if phased, lot 1 will be developed first in a schedule for completion of the project will be provided. | 00:26:43 | |
| Onto the subdivision application. | 00:26:51 | |
| I will not repeat the. | 00:26:54 | |
| Outline of the. | 00:26:58 | |
| Project. | 00:26:59 | |
| On staff review, the Petitioner has provided compliant preliminary plan for the project, including preliminary plat. Petitioner | 00:27:01 | |
| has provided certification that all drainage and environmental requirements will be complied with and that there are no known | 00:27:06 | |
| outstanding issues concerning IDAM. | 00:27:11 | |
| Geotechnical report is not required for the property and staff. The traffic study has been completed by strained associates. | 00:27:17 | |
| In the phase one environmental is not required. | 00:27:25 | |
| Lots meet the size and frontage standards of the zoning ordinance. | 00:27:28 | |
| General, commercial and multifamily districts. | 00:27:31 | |
| Knobs Landing Blvd. is proposed as a through St. between Tuscany and Schreiber Rd. Dimensions and layout. | 00:27:35 | |
| Subdivision control ordinance requirements. | 00:27:43 | |
| Multiple entrances from Schreiber Rd. Knobs Landing Blvd. in Tuscany Dr. is provided. | 00:27:46 | |
| Sidewalks are provided. | 00:27:52 | |
| Certification to meet county drainage and stormwater standards have been provided final approval of the drainage plan. | 00:27:54 | |
| Will be required prior to secondary approval. | 00:28:01 | |
| The petitioner has provided willingness to serve. Letters from Floyd Knobs Water, Georgetown. | 00:28:05 | |
| Township Fire Protection District, Harrison RC, New Albany Wastewater Charter and AT&T. | 00:28:09 | |
| The wastewater will be provided by New Albany Storm Water. | 00:28:16 | |
| Our wastewater is not. | 00:28:19 | |
| Staff recommendations are just that, the. | 00:28:21 | |
| Final approval of drains stormwater plans be required prior to secondary improvement. | 00:28:24 | |
| For the PUD application. | 00:28:30 | |
| I'll go over the PUD process. | 00:28:32 | |
| So part. | 00:28:34 | |
| Planned unit development is a design special district that can be pursued by an applicant. The purpose of the planned unit | 00:28:36 | |
| development is to courage the flexibility to develop or redevelop land in an effort to promote appropriate uses. | 00:28:42 | |
| Maintain unique character features such as natural or historic resources. | 00:28:49 | |
| Promote innovative design concepts. | 00:28:53 | |
| It is also designed to facilitate the economies of scale in relationship to infrastructure, public services, encouraging field | 00:28:56 | |
| development. | 00:28:59 | |
| PUD process. | 00:29:03 | |
| Petitioner meets with staff. | 00:29:05 | |
| For a conceptual step. | 00:29:07 | |
| Sketch playing and playing conference, which they did on. | 00:29:09 | |
| October 23rd, 2024. | 00:29:13 | |
| Petitioner then submits a detailed development plan for review. | 00:29:16 | |
| And submits a PUD application for Employment Commission. | 00:29:19 | |
| The Plan Commission can then. | 00:29:23 | |
| Provide umm. | 00:29:25 | |
| A recommendation to the county commissioners. | 00:29:26 | |
| In a favor favorable recommendation. | 00:29:29 | |
| An unfavorable recommendation or no recommendation? | 00:29:32 | |
| The county commissioners will then review the rezoning petition within 90 days and may approve or disapprove the request. Upon | 00:29:36 | |
| approval, the property is officially resumed. | 00:29:41 | |
| The PUD will then return to the Planning Commission for secondary approval. | 00:29:46 | |
| Of the detailed development plan. | 00:29:50 | |
| No additional public hearing will be required. | 00:29:52 | |
| Safra views of the pod. | 00:29:56 | |
| But very significantly from the zoning. | 00:29:58 | |
| In subdivision control ordinances in a few areas. | 00:30:01 | |
| 1st. | 00:30:08 | |
| It is unclear the minimum. | 00:30:09 | |
| Unit size of the units. | 00:30:10 | |
| We have an 800 square foot. | 00:30:13 | |
| Minimum. So I would just like. | 00:30:15 | |
| The applicant provide that information. | 00:30:17 | |
| Density. They're requesting approximately 20.9 dwellings per acre. | 00:30:20 | |
| Our multi family standard is. | 00:30:25 | |
| Currently 8 is the allowed maximum. | 00:30:28 | |
| We do have several developments in the county. | 00:30:31 | |
| That have. | 00:30:34 | |
| 19 to 20, that's not built. | 00:30:35 | |
| And Gateway villages has about 15. | 00:30:39 | |
| Dwelling units breaker. | 00:30:41 | |
| Parking 2 1/2 spaces are required per dwelling unit. | 00:30:44 | |
| They have provided 1.8 for lot 1 and 1.92 for lot 2. | 00:30:48 | |
| And then the buffer yard. | 00:30:55 | |
| South side of the property. | 00:30:56 | |
| Would require. | 00:30:59 | |
| Buffer Yard 2 standards. | 00:31:00 | |
| The proposed land in the in. | 00:31:03 | |
| Land uses in the PUD are. | 00:31:06 | |
| Are not in conflict with the spirit and intent. | 00:31:08 | |
| Of the comprehensive plan, surrounding land uses and zoning districts. | 00:31:11 | |
| The comprehensive plan. | 00:31:16 | |
| It shows that the area is a commercial growth area. High density should be directed towards adequate infrastructure and public | 00:31:18 | |
| services. | 00:31:21 | |
| Proposal can be served by all utility providers without expansion. | 00:31:24 | |
| In multi family style density should consider mixed land uses which is studs. | 00:31:29 | |
| Zoning and surrounding land uses. The proposal is currently in the general commercial district with residential urban. | 00:31:34 | |
| General commercial adjacent. | 00:31:40 | |
| The proposed blood does provide adequate public service, light, air traffic control, open and more common. | 00:31:43 | |
| Space and recreation. | 00:31:49 | |
| The proposal does include adequate services, as evidenced. | 00:31:52 | |
| Service provider letters. | 00:31:55 | |
| Proposal includes reasonable traffic circulation plan. | 00:31:58 | |
| Traffic impact study has been conducted. | 00:32:01 | |
| And the proposal provides recreational space in the form of a pool and outdoor games area. There's also green space within the | 00:32:04 | |
| development. | 00:32:07 | |
| The proposed PUD is compatible with adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhood. | 00:32:12 | |
| Commercial use is consistent with general commercial uses in the Highlander point in the zoning of adjacent properties, | 00:32:17 | |
| multifamily residential. | 00:32:21 | |
| Is appropriate with mixed uses and should be buffered from adjacent. | 00:32:24 | |
| Residential uses. | 00:32:29 | |
| The proposed BUD will not interfere with the use or diminish the value of adjacent properties. | 00:32:31 | |
| In surrounding neighborhood. | 00:32:35 | |
| Improvements on the land are expected to have positive impacts on neighboring property values. | 00:32:37 | |
| Mixed retail, commercial and multi family will not diminish the use of neighborhood properties with adequate public services | 00:32:42 | |
| provided. | 00:32:46 | |
| Appropriate offering is required to adjourn. | 00:32:50 | |
| Residential properties. | 00:32:53 | |
| HUD will not diminish the level of service for roadway systems in the vicinity. | 00:32:55 | |
| As the traffic impact study. | 00:33:00 | |
| Concluded. | 00:33:03 | |
| The proposed PUD can be immediately and adequately served by the existing public facilities and services. | 00:33:05 | |
| As evidenced by the. | 00:33:11 | |
| Service letters. | 00:33:13 | |
| The proposed POD does preserve natural and historic. | 00:33:15 | |
| Resources to every extent possible. The existing cycles of single family structure used as a commercial office. | 00:33:18 | |
| The site will be cleared and new plantings consistent with the zoning ordinance Landscaping will be installed. | 00:33:24 | |
| There are no known historic resources on the site. | 00:33:30 | |
| Proposed PUD will not be interest to the health, safety and general welfare. The proposed plot is consistent with planning | 00:33:35 | |
| documents for this area. Adequate public infrastructure is available. | 00:33:40 | |
| For the development as our public services. | 00:33:46 | |
| Drainage will be approved by County Stormwater consistent with their requirements. Staff recommendations are favorable | 00:33:49 | |
| recommendation with the following commitments and conditions. | 00:33:53 | |
| Written commitments will be phased. Phase one will be Lot 1 funding or Vincents Road and the schedule for completion of all phases | 00:33:59 | |
| will be provided. | 00:34:03 | |
| To the Planning Commission. | 00:34:07 | |
| Prior to secondary approval. | 00:34:08 | |
| Provide additional screening of dumpster on lot 1 between dumpster and roadway. | 00:34:11 | |
| Provide light at entrance locations where there are none and meet Buffer Yard 2 standards for adjoining residential use to the | 00:34:16 | |
| South. | 00:34:20 | |
| That is the staff report for these 4. | 00:34:24 | |
| Applications. | 00:34:27 | |
| All righty. Thanks, Nick. Any any questions on the board? | 00:34:30 | |
| You have a question. | 00:34:34 | |
| Nick, you indicated. | 00:34:36 | |
| There that strange associates conducted a traffic study for the project and then an acceptable. | 00:34:37 | |
| Loss or level of service was was found. Those law studies typically indicate like a grade between A and F Do you have any idea | 00:34:42 | |
| what the grade was for the particular project? | 00:34:47 | |
| B i.e. and beyond. | 00:34:53 | |
| The the level of service indicated. | 00:34:57 | |
| Which is. | 00:35:01 | |
| Deemed acceptable as the current level of service. | 00:35:03 | |
| So any other? | 00:35:09 | |
| Any other questions? | 00:35:11 | |
| For Nick. | 00:35:14 | |
| And they if. | 00:35:16 | |
| We had a TRC on this right, a technical review committee. | 00:35:17 | |
| Can we explain just a little bit to the board? | 00:35:20 | |
| What came out of that meeting? What's the purpose of that meeting? Yes, the tier the plans provided to the TRC were. | 00:35:24 | |
| A little bit different than what we finally have here. | 00:35:30 | |
| The alignment of the site had the bank on the opposite side on Tuscany Drive. | 00:35:34 | |
| Dumpster was located closer to the roadway on Knox Landing or Knox Landing Blvd. | 00:35:42 | |
| There were more multifamily units. | 00:35:48 | |
| So the parking. | 00:35:51 | |
| Ratios were. | 00:35:53 | |
| Less. | 00:35:55 | |
| And there was number buffer yard. | 00:35:59 | |
| For the residential. | 00:36:00 | |
| Properties to the West. So they didn't make all those modifications for this final application, OK. | 00:36:02 | |
| All righty. | 00:36:11 | |
| So they've already adjusted. | 00:36:14 | |
| The original application, is that correct? | 00:36:16 | |
| At the TRC. | 00:36:19 | |
| Thank you. | 00:36:21 | |
| Are any other questions for Nick? | 00:36:22 | |
| OK. At this point, let me go through just a little bit of a housekeeping here. | 00:36:24 | |
| Because of the sensitivity of this project and the number of. | 00:36:29 | |
| Agenda items we have. | 00:36:34 | |
| We're going to increase the time that we allow. | 00:36:36 | |
| For the applicant to present his. | 00:36:38 | |
| Project and then we're going to double the times. | 00:36:43 | |
| That we have for people to speak in favor, to speak in opposition, and then we will then give the applicant 5 minutes to rebut | 00:36:46 | |
| anything that was so said. So just let the board know that that's what we're going to do because of the. | 00:36:52 | |
| The sensitivity of this project so. | 00:36:58 | |
| If the applicant would like to come forward, state his name and address. | 00:37:01 | |
| We appreciate it. | 00:37:05 | |
| For the record, John Craft with the law firm of Young Lind Anderson Kraft, 126 W Spring Street in New Albany. | 00:37:14 | |
| Appearing on behalf of the applicant. | 00:37:21 | |
| Along with the engineer which would be Jason Copper White with Paul Primavera and Associates. | 00:37:23 | |
| Jackson Theneman is with me as well from Phenomenon. | 00:37:28 | |
| Group LLC. | 00:37:32 | |
| And then likewise Daniel Moriarty. | 00:37:34 | |
| Who has designed the? | 00:37:36 | |
| Project from the standpoint of the architectural piece of that. | 00:37:38 | |
| So ultimately. | 00:37:42 | |
| Four of us will present. | 00:37:44 | |
| I'll cover first of all, as indicated, there are four items before you this evening. | 00:37:47 | |
| Two of which are rezoning. | 00:37:51 | |
| Which means ultimately, those two rezoning issues come to you for a recommendation. | 00:37:53 | |
| Not an approval tonight, but merely. | 00:37:59 | |
| A request as it relates to those zoning requirements. | 00:38:02 | |
| Going forward to the county commissioners with a favorable. | 00:38:06 | |
| And unfavorable or no recommendation at all. | 00:38:09 | |
| Under those two elements, and again, we'll talk a little bit about each one, but under each of those elements. | 00:38:13 | |
| You have to pay due consideration and these are the same considerations the commissioners will look at in order to make a | 00:38:20 | |
| determination. | 00:38:23 | |
| On the passage of these two ordinances. | 00:38:27 | |
| Primarily, Indiana Code 3674603 covers those five elements. | 00:38:30 | |
| Those five elements deal with the Comprehensive Plan and. | 00:38:35 | |
| You'll hear on a. | 00:38:38 | |
| PowerPoint, you'll hear Mr. Copper Weight go through those issues with regards to compliance with the current comprehensive plan. | 00:38:41 | |
| Current conditions and character of current structures and uses in each district. | 00:38:48 | |
| The most desirable use for which land in each district is adapted. | 00:38:53 | |
| Conservation of property values throughout the jurisdiction. | 00:38:57 | |
| And responsible development and growth. | 00:39:01 | |
| You've probably heard a number of items covered by Mr. Creepy when he spoke. | 00:39:03 | |
| Pertaining to the staff report. | 00:39:07 | |
| And this is a growth area in the county? | 00:39:09 | |
| Certainly, again, Mr. Copper weight will cover that more fully. | 00:39:12 | |
| The piece as it relates to. | 00:39:16 | |
| The change from GC, which if you look at the current zoning ordinance in Floyd County, there are 91. | 00:39:18 | |
| Uses that could be put there as a matter of right. | 00:39:27 | |
| Including, uh. | 00:39:30 | |
| Big box commercial. | 00:39:31 | |
| Including smaller units, but it is a GC in their actual 91 uses that could be put there as a matter of right. | 00:39:32 | |
| One of the things that you'll hear this evening is when Mr. Feenman looked at this project. | 00:39:40 | |
| He looked at it from the standpoint of dealing with. | 00:39:45 | |
| Walkability. | 00:39:49 | |
| Specifically, individuals as well as commercial uses don't want to go in an area now just where they're putting a commercial use. | 00:39:51 | |
| They want the possibility of residents that can use that commercial area and also look at the possibility of walking to and from | 00:39:58 | |
| their residence to those commercial uses. | 00:40:04 | |
| When we look at the issue from a GC to the MF. | 00:40:10 | |
| The multifamily. | 00:40:14 | |
| Under the terms of a normal change of zoning. | 00:40:16 | |
| When taking it to an MF that would allow any type of. | 00:40:19 | |
| Multifamily use on this property. | 00:40:23 | |
| Provided it meets the development standards of the multifamily. | 00:40:26 | |
| But the other piece of the rezoning request this evening? | 00:40:29 | |
| Is taking that multifamily to a PUD. | 00:40:33 | |
| And the purpose of a PUD first and foremost is to deal with mixed uses. | 00:40:36 | |
| On a given property. | 00:40:41 | |
| But most importantly to you as well as the county commissioners as well as the community. | 00:40:43 | |
| When you take a. | 00:40:48 | |
| Change to an MF that allows, as long as it meets the requirements, to go as deep and as dense as you desire to do on this 6 plus | 00:40:50 | |
| acres. | 00:40:54 | |
| But with the change to a planned unit development district. | 00:40:59 | |
| What it requires, and you heard Mr. Creevy, again go through the process because the process is one of those that if both zoning | 00:41:04 | |
| changes are forwarded to the commissioners with favorable recommendations and again the commissioners passed those. | 00:41:11 | |
| That ultimately. | 00:41:19 | |
| The PUD must then return to you as the Plan Commission for secondary review. | 00:41:20 | |
| So it's not a matter that we're getting a blank check. | 00:41:26 | |
| For a change to multifamily and do what we desire to do. | 00:41:29 | |
| The project itself. And that's the 4th element you'll see this evening. | 00:41:33 | |
| Is the development plan. | 00:41:37 | |
| But under the terms of a planned unit development district. | 00:41:39 | |
| It is established by way of ordinance. So ultimately. | 00:41:42 | |
| Commissioners pass that ordinance. | 00:41:45 | |
| They will then adopt specific. | 00:41:48 | |
| Definitions of what you may do. | 00:41:50 | |
| Much again as indicated. | 00:41:53 | |
| We went to the. | 00:41:55 | |
| Technical Review Committee on December 18th and walk through this project in order to make certain that what we would do and what | 00:41:57 | |
| the development plan would cover would be in order that we can move forward with it. | 00:42:03 | |
| So it's not a matter that by granting an MF. | 00:42:08 | |
| In that instance, it's a matter of granting an MF with a planned unit development district. | 00:42:12 | |
| It will then designate exactly what can be put on that parcel. | 00:42:17 | |
| That will then be brought back to you as the Plan Commission for secondary review. | 00:42:21 | |
| Once that secondary review is granted. | 00:42:26 | |
| Then from that standpoint, what you end up with is a situation of having to abide. | 00:42:30 | |
| By that plan that you see in front of you. | 00:42:36 | |
| If that is the secondary approval plan. | 00:42:39 | |
| And as a result of that, it allows you as well as the commissioners the ability. | 00:42:41 | |
| To determine what planned documentation. | 00:42:47 | |
| And you heard Mr. Creedy's report, some of those elements of what needs to be provided. | 00:42:50 | |
| In order to move this forward. | 00:42:55 | |
| Provided. | 00:42:57 | |
| It changes from MF. | 00:42:58 | |
| To the PUD. | 00:43:00 | |
| Those two come together. | 00:43:02 | |
| And again, those would be adopted by way of an ordinance by the county commissioners. | 00:43:03 | |
| The other two pieces of it. | 00:43:08 | |
| Provided. | 00:43:10 | |
| Those two zoning changes come forward. Those other two pieces then become ministerial in nature. | 00:43:12 | |
| And that is the subdivision. | 00:43:19 | |
| And as long as the subdivision meets the requirements of the subdivision control ordinance. And again when listening to the report | 00:43:21 | |
| of Mr. Privy, and I'm sure you've read it. | 00:43:26 | |
| Specifically, uh. | 00:43:31 | |
| We meet those requirements if in fact those two zoning changes come about. | 00:43:32 | |
| The other piece of it. | 00:43:37 | |
| Would be the development. | 00:43:39 | |
| And once again, provided that development plan meets all of the elements as to setbacks and otherwise for this zoning district. | 00:43:40 | |
| With the planned unit development district. | 00:43:48 | |
| Then likewise, that is a ministerial action as well. | 00:43:51 | |
| We're here this evening asking specifically that these 4 dockets. | 00:43:55 | |
| Be approved. | 00:43:59 | |
| Two of which were asking for favorable recommendation. | 00:44:00 | |
| To the county commissioners. | 00:44:04 | |
| Certainly your recommendation is what the county commissioners are going to listen to. | 00:44:05 | |
| The county commissioners do not have to follow your recommendation. | 00:44:10 | |
| But certainly from the standpoint it in my experience over 40 plus years. | 00:44:14 | |
| Most times and most often, they will follow that recommendation. So we're here this evening asking for favorable recommendation | 00:44:19 | |
| on. | 00:44:23 | |
| The zoning change from. | 00:44:27 | |
| Our two MF from. | 00:44:30 | |
| The GC as well as asking that MF be limited by way of a PUD. | 00:44:33 | |
| And ask that that likewise be forwarded. | 00:44:39 | |
| With a favorable recommendation. | 00:44:42 | |
| I'm gonna call on. | 00:44:44 | |
| Jason to go through the elements with regards to the plan itself and touch on those elements under the comprehensive plan you | 00:44:46 | |
| should have in front of you. If not, it'll be on the screen a power. | 00:44:51 | |
| PowerPoint presentation regarding that. Thank you. | 00:44:57 | |
| All right. Thank you. How are we doing on time? | 00:45:01 | |
| How much? | 00:45:08 | |
| Two, he had 20. He had total 20 minutes. | 00:45:09 | |
| 12. | 00:45:13 | |
| He got 1212 minutes. I'll try to be quick. | 00:45:15 | |
| There you go. | 00:45:18 | |
| Good evening, Jason Copper. Wait again with Paul from Avera and Associates. | 00:45:19 | |
| I'll try not to repeat anything. | 00:45:22 | |
| Mr. Creeby said, or Mr. Kraft said, though there are probably slides that you repeat that information. | 00:45:24 | |
| I'll try to gloss over those if I can. | 00:45:28 | |
| Again, this is knobs landing mixed-use development. | 00:45:30 | |
| Located at 5031 through 50. | 00:45:33 | |
| 53 Old Vincennes Rd. | 00:45:35 | |
| The next slide, that's the aerial of the site. | 00:45:38 | |
| I don't know that anyone's actually showing you that when they were talking, but it's the southwest quadrant of the intersection | 00:45:41 | |
| of Shriver Rd. | 00:45:43 | |
| And open sense you can see to the West as villas of Floyd Knobs. | 00:45:46 | |
| To the South as a single family residence and the Highlands that's still developing NE is Highlander Point. | 00:45:50 | |
| Just to the east of this Planning Commission may remember. | 00:45:56 | |
| You've approved a bank development plan at that site. | 00:45:59 | |
| Don't know when that will be developed, but it's coming. | 00:46:02 | |
| This is the zoning map for the area. The red is general commercial GC. | 00:46:04 | |
| The orange is residential urban. | 00:46:08 | |
| Are you? | 00:46:10 | |
| These are the four applications that have been talked about already. | 00:46:12 | |
| This is an artist rendering that Mister Moriarty prepared for the site. | 00:46:17 | |
| You can see. | 00:46:21 | |
| Prize and help you, but there are two buildings on the north lot. | 00:46:23 | |
| One building on the South with some amenities together on the north lot. | 00:46:26 | |
| This is the. | 00:46:31 | |
| My engineering version of his color rendering which shows a little bit more detail. It has turned 90°. Apologize for that. | 00:46:32 | |
| But again, it's just a little bit more detailed. | 00:46:40 | |
| So it is 6.4 acres. It will be. | 00:46:43 | |
| The plan is to divide it into two lots. | 00:46:46 | |
| Mr. Creepy went through the particulars. Just to highlight those, Building 1 is 7717 square foot of ground floor retail. | 00:46:49 | |
| With a leasing office, clubhouse. | 00:46:57 | |
| 59 multifamily dwelling units, 21 of which are two-bedroom, 38 of which are one bedroom. | 00:46:58 | |
| Google and other outdoor amenities are proposed there. | 00:47:03 | |
| Building 2 is 66 multifamily dwelling units, 24 two-bedroom and 42 one bedroom. This that's on the South lot and building 3 is a | 00:47:06 | |
| 3600 square foot. | 00:47:11 | |
| Bank Retail. | 00:47:15 | |
| With a drive through. | 00:47:17 | |
| These are the zoning. | 00:47:20 | |
| Change characteristics that Mister Kraft talked about earlier. | 00:47:22 | |
| So I took excerpts from your comprehensive plan that I that I felt showed that this site. | 00:47:28 | |
| Met the requirements. | 00:47:33 | |
| As Mr. Creeby said, smart growth, it's kind of buzzword throughout your comprehensive plan. | 00:47:35 | |
| Smart Growth is a planning theory designed toward the efficient use of land, resources and existing urban infrastructure. | 00:47:40 | |
| And your in your comp plan list. | 00:47:45 | |
| 10 smart growth principles, of which we probably meet 8. | 00:47:48 | |
| Mixed land uses where appropriate. | 00:47:52 | |
| Take advantage of compact building design. | 00:47:54 | |
| Create a range of housing opportunities throughout the jurisdiction. | 00:47:56 | |
| Create walkable communities. You'll see the pedestrian infrastructure we're proposing. | 00:47:59 | |
| Preserve open space. Now you could say this is not preserving open space. | 00:48:06 | |
| But what this does is it brings people to a developed area where there is infrastructure that allows remaining properties to the | 00:48:09 | |
| county to remain. | 00:48:13 | |
| To remain open and undeveloped. | 00:48:17 | |
| Strengthen development Development toward existing communities. | 00:48:20 | |
| Again at Highlander Point. | 00:48:23 | |
| We're at Highlander Point. | 00:48:25 | |
| And then? | 00:48:28 | |
| Encourage community and stakeholder collaboration. | 00:48:30 | |
| You have a very interactive process, as you know with TRC meetings. | 00:48:33 | |
| We took that TRC meeting and those comments from that TRC meeting to heart. | 00:48:36 | |
| And made very significant changes to the plan. | 00:48:40 | |
| The original proposal was, I think, about 156 multifamily dwellings, dwelling units. | 00:48:43 | |
| And a comparable number of retail. | 00:48:48 | |
| The developer shrunk that to 125, split the bank out, per TRC comments. | 00:48:51 | |
| Added the buffering we'll talk about. | 00:48:55 | |
| So he's listening is the point. He's listening and adapting. | 00:48:58 | |
| Theme places to live a lot again, a lot of those. | 00:49:02 | |
| Objectives from the goals meet this this project. I can give you copies of this. | 00:49:07 | |
| When we're finished. | 00:49:12 | |
| Promoting locally grown and owned. | 00:49:13 | |
| It is anticipated that a lot of these retail establishments will be local businesses, locally owned businesses. | 00:49:16 | |
| We're thinking the bank is going to be a relatively small regional bank. | 00:49:22 | |
| Not a necessarily a National Bank. | 00:49:26 | |
| Then your comp plan says direct hire residential developments toward areas of the proximity to adequate infrastructure and public | 00:49:30 | |
| services. | 00:49:33 | |
| Where appropriate, higher density. | 00:49:36 | |
| Patio homes. Multi family development should be directed toward established urban areas based on proximity to existing services | 00:49:38 | |
| and density. | 00:49:42 | |
| Multi family development should be limited to area to areas where they're again access to commercial. | 00:49:45 | |
| Surrounded by utilities. | 00:49:51 | |
| The comp plan designates the Highlander Point as a commercial growth area. | 00:49:54 | |
| Everyone realizes that. | 00:49:58 | |
| A commercial should be. | 00:50:01 | |
| Targeted toward Highlander. The Highlander Point corridor specifically says that. | 00:50:02 | |
| This is the Georgetown Township excerpt from the comp plan. | 00:50:07 | |
| That that. | 00:50:11 | |
| Dark dark box in the upper right hand corner is the location of this. | 00:50:12 | |
| The comp plan for Georgetown mostly focuses on the Edwardsville. | 00:50:16 | |
| Gateway and the Edwardsville Interchange because this site really is more closely related to the Lafayette Township. The east | 00:50:20 | |
| boundary of This site is Lafayette Township. | 00:50:25 | |
| So this is the Lafayette Township map. | 00:50:30 | |
| Map with the box showing the area again. It shows that as an intense development area by your comp plan. | 00:50:32 | |
| Future land use in Georgetown Township would be directed toward existing infrastructure. That's a theme throughout your comp plan. | 00:50:40 | |
| I'll try and skip that. | 00:50:44 | |
| Commercial again at. | 00:50:49 | |
| And this is average for Gateway for Georgetown? | 00:50:50 | |
| Same language in Lafayette even says similar to Georgetown. | 00:50:53 | |
| And then future commercial will be located at Hallander Point. | 00:50:57 | |
| Properties already zoned commercial, but we are. | 00:51:00 | |
| Continuing to implement. | 00:51:03 | |
| Commercial element. | 00:51:04 | |
| This project. | 00:51:06 | |
| Current conditions and structures. | 00:51:07 | |
| Again, there there is quite a bit of development happening and that has happened around this area. | 00:51:09 | |
| You have Highlander Point Commercial. | 00:51:14 | |
| District East. | 00:51:16 | |
| You have additional commercial just east of this with the gas station. | 00:51:17 | |
| Williamsburg Station, the bank that's coming in. | 00:51:21 | |
| This project, as Nick said, would. | 00:51:25 | |
| It's a nice transition from. | 00:51:28 | |
| Commercial. Intense commercial. | 00:51:30 | |
| Through higher density residential to lower density, even though it's still your residential urban. | 00:51:31 | |
| Zoning. | 00:51:37 | |
| And then this is a rendering of the building which you've seen in the package. | 00:51:38 | |
| It is a very similar to what you see right across the street. | 00:51:42 | |
| So the subdivision it is 2 commercial lots. | 00:51:49 | |
| Would be a new road connecting the stub and villas of Floyd Knobs to Schreiber. | 00:51:51 | |
| And if the MF and PUD MF are approved, the subdivision would meet all your requirements. | 00:51:56 | |
| John talked about what a PUD means. | 00:52:06 | |
| So the PUD in this particular case also. | 00:52:09 | |
| Satisfies the development plan. I'll mention that later, but keep in mind when I'm talking about these PUD plans, I'm also talking | 00:52:12 | |
| about the development plan. | 00:52:15 | |
| Again, this is the engineering. | 00:52:19 | |
| Site plan to support the development plan and the PUD. | 00:52:21 | |
| It does feature the three buildings. | 00:52:25 | |
| Also, it features the amenities. There's a swimming pool plan on lot 1. | 00:52:27 | |
| There's an outdoor kitchen and outdoor seating and the outdoor games area that Mister Creeby mentioned earlier. | 00:52:32 | |
| As well as open space to the West. | 00:52:37 | |
| That those facilities are intended to serve both. | 00:52:40 | |
| Both Watts in the neighborhood. | 00:52:44 | |
| Same parameters I listed earlier. | 00:52:47 | |
| There are two entrances from Lot 11 onto the proposed road and one on to Tuscany. | 00:52:50 | |
| There are three interests from Lot 2, one on to Shriver and two onto the proposed roadway. | 00:52:55 | |
| There are pedestrian walks and crossings throughout the site. | 00:53:00 | |
| One interesting feature of the site is that is that once the traffic signal is installed at Schreiber. | 00:53:02 | |
| That has pedestrian crosswalks included as part of the project. | 00:53:09 | |
| You'll be able to walk from villas of Floyd Knobs or the Highlands all the way to anywhere you want to go in Highlander Point. | 00:53:12 | |
| It's going to, it's going to facilitate pedestrian access for that whole region. | 00:53:18 | |
| Again, the amenities on Lot 1. | 00:53:23 | |
| Parking. | 00:53:26 | |
| Lot 1. We've allocated 50 spaces for the proposed retail bank. | 00:53:28 | |
| That leaves 1100. | 00:53:33 | |
| 111 spaces for the multifamily which is 1.88. | 00:53:35 | |
| Spaces per dwelling unit. | 00:53:38 | |
| 127 spaces on Lot 2. | 00:53:40 | |
| Which? | 00:53:43 | |
| Yields 1.92 spaces per dwelling unit. | 00:53:44 | |
| Mr. Creeby mentioned that your ordinance requires 2.5 spaces per dwelling unit. It makes no distinction as to whether they're one | 00:53:47 | |
| bedroom or two-bedroom. | 00:53:51 | |
| I personally believe that's overparked. | 00:53:55 | |
| I did pick up the. | 00:53:58 | |
| Institute of Traffic Engineers Parking generation manual. | 00:54:00 | |
| They indicate that retail is. | 00:54:03 | |
| 5.45 spaces per 1000 square foot of retail, which would be 6 about 62 spaces required. | 00:54:07 | |
| One bedroom units are 1.38 spaces per unit. | 00:54:13 | |
| And a two-bedroom unit is 2.08 spaces per unit. | 00:54:17 | |
| Using a total requirement per ITE. | 00:54:19 | |
| About 265 and we're providing 288. | 00:54:22 | |
| And I can give you copies of this. | 00:54:26 | |
| After the presentation. | 00:54:27 | |
| Lot area. | 00:54:30 | |
| So lot 1. | 00:54:31 | |
| The the pool and the recreation area to me should be included in open space. | 00:54:33 | |
| If you don't include it in open space. | 00:54:37 | |
| Or if you we have 68.8% impervious area. | 00:54:40 | |
| If you do include it as open space, we have 61.5. | 00:54:44 | |
| The MF ordinance require it allows 65. | 00:54:48 | |
| Lot 2 we have a 71.5. | 00:54:52 | |
| Making an overall of 69.85. | 00:54:55 | |
| Or if you exclude the right out the recreation area is 65.4 so very close to what MF? | 00:54:58 | |
| Would otherwise allow. | 00:55:04 | |
| We do have significant landscaping and as Mr. Crete. | 00:55:06 | |
| We do meet the ordinance as far as plantings along the roadways. | 00:55:09 | |
| Parking lot screening and parking islands with plantings. | 00:55:13 | |
| And then we did add the buffer along the West side for bills of fluid knobs. | 00:55:17 | |
| With a wall that is concrete. | 00:55:22 | |
| With plantings behind it, which is specified as a type 2 buffer. | 00:55:24 | |
| We did not do that along. | 00:55:28 | |
| The South Side. | 00:55:30 | |
| I spoke with Mr. Tieneman after we received Mr. Kibe staff report. He is willing to do that but he would like to make a change. | 00:55:32 | |
| Previously, the wall was planned to be brick on both sides. | 00:55:39 | |
| He spent a lot of time in Florida lately and they have products there that would be concrete walls with stucco. | 00:55:42 | |
| On either side that are still very attractive. | 00:55:48 | |
| And so. | 00:55:51 | |
| He would extend this wall to be 300 feet. | 00:55:52 | |
| Along the South line. | 00:55:54 | |
| There's a Creek that runs from that wider island there. | 00:55:56 | |
| We can. Once you get past that Creek, it really doesn't make sense to buffer that area. So he would extend the buffer the wall. | 00:55:59 | |
| That extra 300 feet with the plantings and that would then meet the requirements of type 2. | 00:56:05 | |
| That that about 70 foot stretch. | 00:56:10 | |
| On the east side of the Creek would not, but we still have the plantings there. | 00:56:12 | |
| And you can see that's the front yard of the neighbor. | 00:56:16 | |
| It should be less intrusive to him at that area. | 00:56:20 | |
| The lighting plan meets the standards of the ordinance. No no fixture is taller than 20 feet and it's all down lighting. | 00:56:24 | |
| These are the proposed lighting fixtures. | 00:56:31 | |
| Just so we're showing a unified. | 00:56:33 | |
| Design The sign plan meets the requirements of the ordinance. There are two monument signs, one at Tuscany and one at Knox Lane | 00:56:35 | |
| Knox Landing Blvd. at Schreiber. | 00:56:41 | |
| And all the building signage would comply with the existing sign against. | 00:56:46 | |
| Ordinance the building facades. It's an attractive building. It meets the state requirements of the Highlander Point Overlay | 00:56:50 | |
| District. | 00:56:53 | |
| Brick, stone and Hardy. | 00:56:57 | |
| You've seen that. | 00:56:59 | |
| This is a blow up of the building 1. | 00:57:01 | |
| Rendering This is a blow up of the Building 2 rendering which is on the South lot. | 00:57:04 | |
| And this is the the bank with building one in the background. | 00:57:08 | |
| OK. So common concerns that we hear always traffic. I know you've heard it from the audience today. | 00:57:15 | |
| I'm not sure how many people are aware, but the county is planning to install a traffic signal at Shriver and Old Vincennes. | 00:57:20 | |
| That has been in the plan. They're also upgrading Open Olden Sins. | 00:57:27 | |
| The traffic study indicates that. | 00:57:30 | |
| The intersections as proposed in the design year for original traffic study will also operate an acceptable level. | 00:57:33 | |
| With additional traffic from this proposed development. | 00:57:38 | |
| Drainage Fluke County is the most stringent drainage requirements in the region. | 00:57:41 | |
| We anticipate stormwater and underground detention facilities circled there in the light blue. | 00:57:46 | |
| That that wider island that you saw is the discharge town. | 00:57:52 | |
| And then the county had commissioned a study for this whole area back in 2021. | 00:57:56 | |
| That showed if development continued in accordance with your stormwater ordinance, that things will get better overtime. | 00:58:01 | |
| Questions. | 00:58:09 | |
| OK, you didn't do bad. You missed about 15 seconds. Sorry about that. | 00:58:11 | |
| I do have a question OK, any that's why any questions for Mr. | 00:58:15 | |
| I'm a little unclear on your on your wall. | 00:58:20 | |
| On your wall. | 00:58:23 | |
| Are you leaving Brick at Tuscany? | 00:58:25 | |
| Are you switching it wanting to switch it all to the stucco wall? | 00:58:27 | |
| He would request that we could switch it all to the stucco wall. | 00:58:32 | |
| Because of the additional length. | 00:58:35 | |
| That's a request. | 00:58:37 | |
| So when you're you're saying 300 feet. | 00:58:38 | |
| This is the additional approximately 300 feet. | 00:58:41 | |
| Cortana. | 00:58:46 | |
| That's the landscape plan. This is the 300 feet you're talking about, correct? | 00:58:48 | |
| It's it's this. | 00:58:52 | |
| It's this area here. | 00:58:53 | |
| Just that's that's turned, yes, just short of that wider island there. | 00:58:56 | |
| You do show. | 00:59:03 | |
| 60 foot of a vinyl fence. | 00:59:06 | |
| Oh. | 00:59:09 | |
| That's for parking lot screening. | 00:59:10 | |
| Your ordinance requires a three foot understand why is it there? | 00:59:13 | |
| I'm just wondering if we should make it. | 00:59:18 | |
| Match the rest of the ball. | 00:59:20 | |
| Question something? | 00:59:23 | |
| Instead of final, maybe 60 feet. | 00:59:26 | |
| I, I'm going to, I'm going to step out on a limb and say, well, that's. | 00:59:29 | |
| I just think it ought to match I guess. | 00:59:34 | |
| No problem. | 00:59:36 | |
| My first meeting SO. | 00:59:39 | |
| Indulge me, what were you talking about the fence parking lot then? | 00:59:44 | |
| There. | 00:59:49 | |
| There's a little piece of fence right here. | 00:59:51 | |
| That's supposed to be final. | 00:59:54 | |
| You're in the part of our ordinance says you've got to screen the parking lot. | 00:59:56 | |
| Correct. The ordinance requires any parking that faces a street or a neighbor has to be screened with three foot tall shrubs. | 00:59:59 | |
| Over 3 foot tall fence. | 01:00:06 | |
| So we can't fit shrubs in that area because it's tied up to the right of way. | 01:00:08 | |
| So I was proposing a fence. | 01:00:11 | |
| Battle. If it has to be a wall, I don't. | 01:00:13 | |
| I think that's a yeah. | 01:00:16 | |
| Yeah, understood. | 01:00:18 | |
| Yeah, this may be a question for the developer, but in terms of the. | 01:00:20 | |
| Target renter. | 01:00:24 | |
| Are we looking at Class A facilities or what kind of amenities, what kind of people are we targeting? | 01:00:26 | |
| To inhabit the buildings, what he's told me is granite countertops, you know, very nice facilities. I think he's targeting the | 01:00:31 | |
| minimum rent to be 1500. | 01:00:35 | |
| For a one bedroom. | 01:00:40 | |
| Well, give me a. | 01:00:42 | |
| All right. Anybody else? | 01:00:46 | |
| I do have one question, the Connector Rd. that's that is proposed, will there be parking allowed on that road? No. OK. Will you | 01:00:51 | |
| make sure that that's. | 01:00:56 | |
| Either signage or somehow. | 01:01:01 | |
| Make sure that doesn't happen because I could see that. | 01:01:03 | |
| In advance I could get. | 01:01:06 | |
| Crowded. | 01:01:08 | |
| All right, go ahead next. | 01:01:10 | |
| That will be a county. | 01:01:14 | |
| Road County. | 01:01:15 | |
| Oh, it's Canada. | 01:01:17 | |
| They will. They'll. | 01:01:19 | |
| It'll be dedicated to the county after it's called, so it's dedicated to the county. | 01:01:21 | |
| OK, All right. Makes it so we'll let Frank make that decision. | 01:01:26 | |
| No. | 01:01:33 | |
| Oh, I meant to start out. | 01:01:35 | |
| And say that. | 01:01:40 | |
| I appreciate all the changes that were made, I think. | 01:01:42 | |
| Several of the comments came from me about. | 01:01:47 | |
| Moving the bank and. | 01:01:49 | |
| All of that and I think it's a much improved plan over what was originally presented, so. | 01:01:50 | |
| You reduce the number of apartments, you move the bank. | 01:01:57 | |
| So I do like to plan much better than was originally submitted. | 01:02:01 | |
| Great. Thank you. | 01:02:05 | |
| All right. At this time, what we'd like to do. | 01:02:07 | |
| And and just I'd like for everybody just be respectful. | 01:02:10 | |
| And kind of hold your comments down, if you will. | 01:02:13 | |
| We're going to we're going to open up 20 minute session. | 01:02:16 | |
| For anybody that like to speak in favor of this project, come forward in favor. | 01:02:19 | |
| In favor. | 01:02:24 | |
| OK, state your name. | 01:02:26 | |
| I'd like to thank them for all the wonderful. I need your name and address, I'm sorry. | 01:02:30 | |
| OK. | 01:02:35 | |
| And I have an 8047 Schreiber Rd. | 01:02:36 | |
| But I am speaking in favor of this project. I respect the wonderful things he has provided our community. | 01:02:39 | |
| So I will say thank you for that, but. | 01:02:47 | |
| You know, we don't always build wonderful things. I'm gonna support something that's not so wonderful because I can think of. | 01:02:50 | |
| 1019 people you know since. | 01:02:56 | |
| Friday night. | 01:02:59 | |
| That think this is a bad idea. | 01:03:00 | |
| So I think he'll need a little support. | 01:03:02 | |
| I'll say that the idea that they didn't have enough room to put shrubbery behind the fence, it's laughable. | 01:03:04 | |
| The idea that. | 01:03:10 | |
| You know pedestrians will be playing in a roundabout. | 01:03:11 | |
| That's going to be built in the future. | 01:03:15 | |
| Is asinine. | 01:03:17 | |
| I mean, I know you all might have agendas or might have your minds made-up, but this is a bad idea. This does not. | 01:03:19 | |
| I don't know if you read the same comprehensive plan that I did the same, you know, Highlander point. | 01:03:26 | |
| Gateway plan that I read, but I guess it's up for interpretation. | 01:03:32 | |
| This is zoning change. | 01:03:36 | |
| I don't believe. | 01:03:38 | |
| That that zoning change fits the vision that you had been outlaid. | 01:03:39 | |
| That I read about. | 01:03:43 | |
| I can say that. | 01:03:45 | |
| When I read about the Highlander point plan. | 01:03:46 | |
| It was unfavorable to have multifamily housing in that area. That was the least. | 01:03:49 | |
| The least liked proposal. | 01:03:53 | |
| So what's changed? | 01:03:55 | |
| We don't need the destination. | 01:03:57 | |
| You know, if you have pedestrians, it's going to be even more chaos. | 01:04:00 | |
| And it's already bad and terrible traffic. | 01:04:04 | |
| I like this area. This is a great area. I think we are going to be. | 01:04:07 | |
| Value is by allowing this to go through. | 01:04:10 | |
| So I implore you, please. | 01:04:13 | |
| Don't. | 01:04:16 | |
| Don't let this happen. | 01:04:17 | |
| This is a nice place. We should have nice places. People should aspire to be in nice places. We want to encourage home ownership, | 01:04:20 | |
| not rental. OK, I'm going to cut you. Cut you off. | 01:04:25 | |
| I think you've taken. | 01:04:30 | |
| More in an opposition side than a favorable side, so. | 01:04:32 | |
| But we'll. | 01:04:35 | |
| We'll let you come back up and take the time away from the opposition if you want to. I'm just trying to be fair here. | 01:04:36 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:04:42 | |
| This is in favor. | 01:04:43 | |
| Please. | 01:04:44 | |
| More than in the favor. | 01:04:45 | |
| I'm saying your name and your address. Brian's are sweet. OK, I live in the house South. | 01:04:47 | |
| If you bring the picture back up, just tell us your address please. | 01:04:54 | |
| It's 5007 over in Saints Row, its original house. Go ahead. | 01:04:57 | |
| Main road was my driveway. | 01:05:02 | |
| OK. | 01:05:05 | |
| If she can get rid of the thing up there. | 01:05:06 | |
| You just go ahead with your comments please. What I'm trying to do is. | 01:05:10 | |
| You're changing the. | 01:05:14 | |
| The Creek you're putting. | 01:05:15 | |
| 660 inch pipes in. | 01:05:18 | |
| It's going to come down to my driveway, which is a 24 inch. I'm going to have to stop you too. It sounds like you're in | 01:05:22 | |
| opposition. | 01:05:25 | |
| No, no, no, I'm not in opposition. | 01:05:28 | |
| Get this on the record. | 01:05:31 | |
| Why the engineers people were here and the developers. Do you have some positive to say about this project? I'm just trying to get | 01:05:33 | |
| you to let me tell you what I need to do because I'm the guy on the side that's going to be effective. OK, I'm going to ask you to | 01:05:39 | |
| come up when the opposition time comes up, if you don't mind, Sir. | 01:05:45 | |
| You're talking, I'm just trying to explain to me what. | 01:05:51 | |
| I want you to put in. | 01:05:55 | |
| For the engineers to do, it's not going to be a. | 01:05:57 | |
| You know, either would. | 01:06:00 | |
| Yeah, it's just trying to tell you. Do you have something to say in favor of this petition? | 01:06:01 | |
| Is the question yes or no? | 01:06:07 | |
| If you do, say it. | 01:06:10 | |
| I'm Either way, you need to sit down, Sir. Thank you very much for your time. | 01:06:11 | |
| Winner, Let me one more. | 01:06:16 | |
| Officer, would you please remove this man from this meeting? | 01:06:18 | |
| All because I live next door. | 01:06:25 | |
| I asked you to sit down three times, Sir. I'm sorry. | 01:06:28 | |
| All right, one more, one more time. | 01:06:34 | |
| Is there anybody that has anything that they like to say in favor of this project? Please come forward. | 01:06:36 | |
| In favor. | 01:06:42 | |
| Please umm. | 01:06:44 | |
| Ladies and gentlemen, we have a process and please respect it. | 01:06:47 | |
| We're just, we're doing a job up here. If we're trying to do our job, please let us do it. That's all I ask you. | 01:06:50 | |
| We're going to give everybody the same respect. | 01:06:56 | |
| That's all I ask you to do. | 01:06:58 | |
| Anybody else in favor of this, please step forward. | 01:07:00 | |
| OK. Is there any Sherry? | 01:07:03 | |
| We got we got an off site location because. | 01:07:07 | |
| Our elevator is broke down. Sherry, would you come forward and tell us whether we have somebody there once I speak in favor of | 01:07:11 | |
| this? | 01:07:14 | |
| No, you do not. OK. Thank you, Sherry. Appreciate. | 01:07:19 | |
| OK at this time. | 01:07:23 | |
| If you will start the. | 01:07:26 | |
| Go ahead. Laram, Sarah. | 01:07:27 | |
| I will. I will. | 01:07:31 | |
| At this time we start the timer for the opposition And what I asked. | 01:07:32 | |
| Hold on. | 01:07:37 | |
| Please give us a minute here. | 01:07:37 | |
| What I ask you to do is. | 01:07:40 | |
| For the for the courtesy of people that want to speak. | 01:07:42 | |
| If somebody already brought something up about. | 01:07:45 | |
| The traffic. | 01:07:47 | |
| Are something that drainage or something that? | 01:07:49 | |
| Please don't repeat it, save room for somebody has something new to say but. | 01:07:51 | |
| At that point this gentleman. | 01:07:55 | |
| Right here, if you will. | 01:07:57 | |
| Remember, there's people behind you, so give us give them time, please. And we do just so that everybody's on the same page. We do | 01:07:59 | |
| have a time limit. It's 20 minutes. | 01:08:03 | |
| That is for everyone that wishes to speak in opposition so. | 01:08:07 | |
| It's 10 minutes normally on our PER. | 01:08:12 | |
| For our requirements. | 01:08:15 | |
| Well I think what they see is so on the screen it does say 10. That is because it only allows her to do 10. So when it hits 10 she | 01:08:17 | |
| will reset it for another 10 so. | 01:08:21 | |
| That is for everyone, not for each person. Yeah, we will get back to 20. It's just thank you. | 01:08:26 | |
| My name is Bill Emerson. I live at 339 Custody Drive in the village of Floyd's Knobs. | 01:08:33 | |
| We bought our. | 01:08:39 | |
| Lot in 2020 and. | 01:08:40 | |
| Don theme and build up. | 01:08:43 | |
| House quality house that we wanted. | 01:08:44 | |
| During our meeting with Mr. Theme and we asked what he would be building on the adjacent property. | 01:08:47 | |
| Which we're talking about today. | 01:08:53 | |
| He said. | 01:08:55 | |
| Build a medical services building along old business ends and might build a senior community with possible assisted living | 01:08:57 | |
| community. | 01:09:00 | |
| On the rest of the acreage? | 01:09:04 | |
| That sounded good to us. | 01:09:06 | |
| We love living the village of Floyd's Knobs. | 01:09:08 | |
| Walk me to our location for the convenience of having amenities that we wanted nearby. | 01:09:11 | |
| I would much rather the Don Theman build what he suggested to us. | 01:09:17 | |
| Rather than the. | 01:09:22 | |
| I do not support the project as presented tonight. | 01:09:25 | |
| I would really like to see. | 01:09:29 | |
| Mr. Thieneman. | 01:09:32 | |
| Complete the villas. | 01:09:33 | |
| Rather than us having to continue to live in the construction. | 01:09:35 | |
| Zone site. They're in Phillips. | 01:09:39 | |
| I like the houses he builds, he does a great job. | 01:09:44 | |
| But if you drove up into the villas or you drove over to the other. | 01:09:47 | |
| Project over in Georgetown. | 01:09:51 | |
| It's an unfinished project. | 01:09:53 | |
| And and those of us who live there. | 01:09:55 | |
| Are really held hostage? | 01:09:58 | |
| By an unfinished project where we can't have our own homeowners association until Dawn finishes the project. | 01:10:00 | |
| I really wish you all would put something in. | 01:10:07 | |
| And your bylaws or whatever if a project is started. | 01:10:10 | |
| Then it needs to be finished at some particular point. | 01:10:15 | |
| Our development was not that large that it couldn't be finished. | 01:10:19 | |
| And the and the other piece of that is. | 01:10:23 | |
| The walkability. | 01:10:25 | |
| We have sidewalks once our house is built. | 01:10:27 | |
| But we have large amounts of space in our in our. | 01:10:31 | |
| On Tuscany. On Milan. | 01:10:34 | |
| That we have to walk in the street. | 01:10:36 | |
| So it's a walkability neighborhood. | 01:10:38 | |
| But Don hasn't finished the sidewalks. | 01:10:41 | |
| That are that need to be finished they cross the line across Tuscany so anyway. | 01:10:45 | |
| I do not agree with Mr. Cooperates to comment about. | 01:10:52 | |
| This states that the rezoning would not be injurious to the value of the profit in the area. | 01:10:56 | |
| Come on, when did you ever put apartments next to? | 01:11:02 | |
| Houses and never lowered the property. | 01:11:06 | |
| And I'd say the same thing there. | 01:11:09 | |
| You put apartments next to houses, you lower the property. | 01:11:11 | |
| I'm grateful that the original location of the bank. | 01:11:16 | |
| Has been moved. I'm glad that the project is not as large as it once was. I appreciate that. | 01:11:19 | |
| The change in the fence. | 01:11:27 | |
| I want the masonry brick fence. | 01:11:29 | |
| I'm with the masonry. | 01:11:32 | |
| I don't want the stucco fence. I've seen them. Nice. | 01:11:35 | |
| But what? | 01:11:39 | |
| We have is. | 01:11:40 | |
| I want the brick fence. | 01:11:42 | |
| My biggest concern about the project. | 01:11:46 | |
| Is. | 01:11:49 | |
| The dumpsters. | 01:11:50 | |
| One of them is right there at the entrance to Tuscany Drive. | 01:11:52 | |
| Right by very first house on the left on Tuscany. | 01:11:56 | |
| You've got a you've got a 24 foot dumpster corral. | 01:12:01 | |
| And then right behind the winnings house back there on the second building be built. | 01:12:05 | |
| Also is a large dumpster corral right behind those homes? | 01:12:10 | |
| I don't want I don't know how often they pick up those dumpsters and apartments, whether that's once a week or. | 01:12:16 | |
| Three times a week. | 01:12:21 | |
| I just I don't want the. | 01:12:23 | |
| This put the dumpsters. | 01:12:25 | |
| Does your way? | 01:12:27 | |
| Sir, you have to talk to us. You can't talk to anybody. I'm sorry. | 01:12:32 | |
| Move the dumpsters. | 01:12:42 | |
| Move the dump. | 01:12:44 | |
| And if you move the dumpsters. | 01:12:45 | |
| I can. I can probably live with it. | 01:12:47 | |
| That I don't like where the dumpsters are at all for the people in the village of Floyd's Knobs. | 01:12:49 | |
| So anyway, I would encourage you to make those changes before you vote tonight. | 01:12:57 | |
| All right. Thank you, Bill. | 01:13:01 | |
| All right, come forward. State your name and address for us, Sir. | 01:13:03 | |
| 10th Interest Property owner .740 N Luther Rd. I cannot think of anything that would cause more problems. | 01:13:06 | |
| On old Vincennes Rd. in the traffic flow then this project right here. | 01:13:13 | |
| It is time for the people to speak up. | 01:13:18 | |
| We have a nightmare there, we all know it. | 01:13:20 | |
| We all know it, the change in zoning. | 01:13:24 | |
| Is wrong. | 01:13:26 | |
| Is wrong. Saying pedestrian traffic can crossover Vincent's road is crazy. | 01:13:28 | |
| Somebody's gonna die. | 01:13:33 | |
| I drive that bus through there twice a day and it is a nightmare. | 01:13:35 | |
| Now I need that. | 01:13:39 | |
| Were certified letters. | 01:13:40 | |
| Sent out for this yet? | 01:13:42 | |
| For affected property owners in here. | 01:13:44 | |
| No, we're just OK. | 01:13:46 | |
| You want that? You want me to answer that? | 01:13:48 | |
| Yeah, go ahead. OK. Have they been sent out? | 01:13:50 | |
| Yes, they have. | 01:13:53 | |
| Yes. | 01:13:55 | |
| Just us. | 01:13:57 | |
| Personally, pardon me, was there a list? The reason I ask is this in the past? | 01:13:59 | |
| You see, they were sent out. I can take the past 10 years. | 01:14:04 | |
| I was always included because if you go too deep on that. | 01:14:07 | |
| Especially because of the drainage problem. | 01:14:11 | |
| I want to see. | 01:14:14 | |
| Really tough drainage plan. | 01:14:16 | |
| I want to see it. | 01:14:19 | |
| You held it up. | 01:14:21 | |
| On the on the. | 01:14:22 | |
| Project before over there. | 01:14:25 | |
| The Highlands. | 01:14:27 | |
| And this here, I catch 8, I catch 90% of this. You all know that everybody knows. | 01:14:29 | |
| But I don't want to see a change in zoning here. | 01:14:34 | |
| We have enough problems on Old Vincent's Road. | 01:14:37 | |
| Here's a great example very quickly. | 01:14:41 | |
| 22 Prosser buses leave Floyd Central at. | 01:14:44 | |
| 7:30. | 01:14:48 | |
| In the morning. | 01:14:50 | |
| They have to fight to get the OH Vincent Rd. They have to fight to get 150 interchange. By the time they get them through | 01:14:52 | |
| Charlestown Road and down to Prosser, it's time to bring them home. Education is slipping in this county because of them. | 01:14:59 | |
| Things like that. Right now I asked for a. | 01:15:06 | |
| Negative. | 01:15:09 | |
| Recommendation for this? | 01:15:11 | |
| No more traffic. | 01:15:12 | |
| No more building in that area. | 01:15:15 | |
| Thank you, Mr. | 01:15:16 | |
| Your name and address please. | 01:15:21 | |
| Names Andrew Gromac. I live at 8042 Tribal Rd. in the islands UMM. | 01:15:23 | |
| Evening Commission Board, Real quick, I have a question for you. I just moved here from Arizona in August. | 01:15:28 | |
| Are you guys elected officials? | 01:15:34 | |
| Or just how does that work? Everybody at this table is appointed except. | 01:15:36 | |
| Point on this board. | 01:15:42 | |
| On this board is appointed OK, OK, so you're not this general right here you want to buy the he's appointed. | 01:15:43 | |
| OK. Yes, Sir. Well, the reason I bring that up is. | 01:15:49 | |
| As of. | 01:15:51 | |
| Just before this meeting, if you go to Change.org, there is 1017 signatures. | 01:15:52 | |
| From this area that are opposed to this development plan. | 01:15:58 | |
| Coming from Arizona, where I live is the 4th largest metropolitan area in the United States right now. | 01:16:04 | |
| I moved in an area that was. | 01:16:09 | |
| Semi rural. | 01:16:11 | |
| And watch apartment buildings go up around my my house year after year after year. Over 15 years went from non. | 01:16:12 | |
| No crime at all. | 01:16:20 | |
| To prime rampant throughout my area. | 01:16:21 | |
| The average rent in my neighborhood in the Highlands, I'd have to say is anywhere from. | 01:16:25 | |
| Mortgage is 2500 to mine is just a little over 3000. | 01:16:30 | |
| When you're putting. | 01:16:34 | |
| Apartments up here. | 01:16:36 | |
| These people don't have any skin in the game. They don't own the area that will own their apartments. They don't have any | 01:16:38 | |
| incentive to take care of the area. | 01:16:41 | |
| So besides the traffic, that's already been discussed. | 01:16:45 | |
| And everything else. | 01:16:48 | |
| I'm politely asking. | 01:16:49 | |
| The board to vote nay on this as well. | 01:16:51 | |
| I'm telling you guys that. | 01:16:54 | |
| The Knobs area moved in here because it's rural enough. | 01:16:55 | |
| Where it's semi big city but not big city. You start doing this, the domino effect is going to happen and I promise you guys | 01:16:58 | |
| you're not going to like the outcome. | 01:17:02 | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Sir. | 01:17:05 | |
| Restate your name and address for the address. | 01:17:11 | |
| It's a good thing we're all here right now, because we'd all be stuck at the light at 1:50 for another 5 or 6 more turns if we | 01:17:15 | |
| were all heading home right now. | 01:17:20 | |
| I don't trust a word that the theemans say. If anybody knows what has happened, up it. | 01:17:25 | |
| Heritage Springs neighborhood that he was able to swindle a Dollar General and duplexes. | 01:17:30 | |
| After his plans already went through. | 01:17:35 | |
| I know the neighborhood. | 01:17:38 | |
| Residents tried to fight him on that and somehow he had wording that. | 01:17:39 | |
| Was able to get through and so that. | 01:17:43 | |
| Didn't workout well for them. | 01:17:45 | |
| I have more concern with my schools. | 01:17:47 | |
| My kids and I have all gone through Naomi Blue County Schools. We had the largest middle school in the state of Indiana, which is | 01:17:50 | |
| not a record I would like to hold. | 01:17:54 | |
| Because it's way too many kids. | 01:17:59 | |
| There's not a cap size on classrooms in the state of Indiana, which is also a problem to me because I'm pretty sure the fire | 01:18:02 | |
| department should have one. | 01:18:05 | |
| But you putting in all of these? | 01:18:10 | |
| Residential apartments is going to just. | 01:18:12 | |
| Ruin. I asked. | 01:18:16 | |
| Ruin the class sizes for one. I mean, the teachers are already capped, they can't handle anymore. | 01:18:18 | |
| The kids can't get through lunch lines. | 01:18:23 | |
| Because they are in the longest lunch line ever, they can't sit there and eat. Your kids will come home and tell you that they | 01:18:25 | |
| didn't get to eat lunch today because the line was so long. The buses are so full. | 01:18:31 | |
| You've been into JC or tried to get something at the pharmacy. You're in a 40 minute line trying to cash out. | 01:18:38 | |
| And get your prescriptions picked up because the grocery store can't handle the population that's already there. | 01:18:44 | |
| So it's not just about the traffic, it's about the schools, it's about the community that we've tried to keep. | 01:18:50 | |
| And businesses maybe would be OK in that space. | 01:18:57 | |
| But that many apartments is just a ridiculous amount of people moving into our area. | 01:19:01 | |
| And you can say you did a traffic study. | 01:19:07 | |
| I don't believe it at all. | 01:19:10 | |
| And then there's word that you're not going to let they're going to change the traffic pattern to where you can't go straight | 01:19:11 | |
| across Walgreens. | 01:19:15 | |
| Across 150 that they're going to change it to turn and go up. | 01:19:20 | |
| To your girls Rd. up to 1 old Vincennes the other way and have to try. | 01:19:23 | |
| Turn around. That makes no sense, but I heard that today from Qatar construction people. | 01:19:27 | |
| So. | 01:19:32 | |
| Obviously not in favor of this and I think more. | 01:19:34 | |
| My kids school. | 01:19:37 | |
| Than anything at this point. | 01:19:38 | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Taylor. | 01:19:40 | |
| I am speaking in the proper time now. My name is Aaron Jones, 8047 Trevor Rd. | 01:19:47 | |
| There are individuals that approach me that have been unable to sign this petition for one reason or another, whether they do not | 01:19:53 | |
| have. | 01:19:56 | |
| This dude or did not want to, but similar number here. | 01:19:59 | |
| So I just want to state that. | 01:20:02 | |
| But I'll say that. | 01:20:04 | |
| From where I where I moved from? | 01:20:05 | |
| We are very familiar with this issue. | 01:20:07 | |
| I worked very hard to be here. | 01:20:09 | |
| I did my research. I looked at the zoning. I looked at hydrology. I looked at traffic studies. I studied. | 01:20:12 | |
| I believed in this community. | 01:20:18 | |
| I truly did. I wanted to be here. I chose to be here. | 01:20:19 | |
| I worked my **** off to be. | 01:20:22 | |
| So my family would happen. | 01:20:24 | |
| Access to better opportunities than I did. | 01:20:25 | |
| Coming from Jefferson County, they built. | 01:20:28 | |
| This low income, luxury whatever apartments everywhere around me within the South end of Louisville. | 01:20:30 | |
| And you can see how well that's going for them. | 01:20:35 | |
| And how the problems that they have. And I ask you, do you want to be like Louisville? I have faith in you all. | 01:20:37 | |
| I feel like we can be better than Louisville. I'm not saying we are better, I'm just saying that. | 01:20:43 | |
| Our government. | 01:20:46 | |
| Can work better than rules because we can all see how the government is working. We do not want to be like Louisville. I am a | 01:20:47 | |
| refugee. | 01:20:50 | |
| I literally. | 01:20:54 | |
| Don't want to be back right where I was. | 01:20:55 | |
| And once this goes through, it's gonna set precedent work to keep happening and we do not want to devalue our area, whether that | 01:20:58 | |
| be New Albany here there. | 01:21:02 | |
| We have something beautiful that works. We can make it work. | 01:21:06 | |
| But if we. | 01:21:10 | |
| Changing areas that don't need changing. | 01:21:11 | |
| In ways that. | 01:21:13 | |
| We don't support. | 01:21:14 | |
| It doesn't make sense. | 01:21:15 | |
| He could put this anywhere. This is 6 acres. There are other parcels. | 01:21:17 | |
| And this is zoned. | 01:21:21 | |
| In a way that does not support this. | 01:21:23 | |
| So. | 01:21:25 | |
| I don't know why this is an argument. | 01:21:26 | |
| I know he has every right. I think I believe in the free market. I only tell him he can't tell what he wants to. | 01:21:28 | |
| But I believe in the zoning. That's why I bought my house. | 01:21:32 | |
| It's commercial. I don't have to worry about this. | 01:21:35 | |
| But now I'm in the same boat. | 01:21:38 | |
| That's just. | 01:21:40 | |
| I'm sorry that is. | 01:21:41 | |
| It is sickening to me. | 01:21:43 | |
| I'm Scott Sugar, I live at 6378 old Vincennes Rd. | 01:21:52 | |
| I retired up here from the Army as a engineer officer. | 01:21:57 | |
| I am going to touch on a little bit of what some of the other people. | 01:22:01 | |
| And spoke about. | 01:22:04 | |
| But really what I'm going to do is I'm going to ask some questions that I think every. | 01:22:06 | |
| One for the traffic study. | 01:22:11 | |
| Everyone that drives that area goes through those intersections. | 01:22:13 | |
| At 1:50 no Vincents. | 01:22:16 | |
| They know what chaos it is at certain times of day. | 01:22:18 | |
| For a lot of people it is a stressful. | 01:22:21 | |
| Event just going through. | 01:22:23 | |
| That intersection. | 01:22:25 | |
| Making it past Highlander Point headed down to the school. | 01:22:27 | |
| The other thing I want everybody. | 01:22:30 | |
| School buses go through there every day. | 01:22:32 | |
| And. | 01:22:37 | |
| Everybody who has a student down there at Highland Hills. | 01:22:39 | |
| Or at Void Central. | 01:22:42 | |
| Every day we get calls about the school bus situation. | 01:22:44 | |
| Routes canceled. | 01:22:48 | |
| This and. | 01:22:49 | |
| And it's usually two to three a day, honestly. | 01:22:50 | |
| So that's one challenge. | 01:22:52 | |
| And this will impact. | 01:22:54 | |
| The challenges that. | 01:22:56 | |
| The Floyd County school system has. | 01:22:58 | |
| With uh. | 01:23:00 | |
| School traffic, School bus traffic, getting kids to school sometimes. | 01:23:01 | |
| It's a safety concern. | 01:23:05 | |
| The question I have is with that traffic study. | 01:23:07 | |
| Did they account in that traffic study for all the other construction that's going to be going on? | 01:23:10 | |
| Up just north of. | 01:23:15 | |
| The JC. | 01:23:17 | |
| Because. | 01:23:21 | |
| You put this in, it's already going to overtax. | 01:23:23 | |
| A stressful area right there. | 01:23:27 | |
| That intersection. | 01:23:29 | |
| Put even more construction in if there's already plans. | 01:23:30 | |
| Multi Housing. | 01:23:34 | |
| North of the JC? What kind of impact? | 01:23:36 | |
| And a half of that intersection. | 01:23:38 | |
| When we put the stop light in there. | 01:23:41 | |
| That's already going to happen. | 01:23:44 | |
| Act regardless of where you put this, intersect this. | 01:23:46 | |
| Complex in there or not, it's already going to change the dynamic of that in the flow. | 01:23:49 | |
| Off that intersection area and it's going to make more challenge to get through. | 01:23:54 | |
| I think it's a bad idea. | 01:23:59 | |
| To put. | 01:24:02 | |
| This specific. | 01:24:03 | |
| The housing. | 01:24:07 | |
| And have this many people in this area. | 01:24:09 | |
| Just simply because it's. | 01:24:13 | |
| Challenges it's going to have on those intersections. | 01:24:14 | |
| And I know. | 01:24:18 | |
| You know, we all look at growth in the area. | 01:24:19 | |
| We know what's coming. | 01:24:21 | |
| But we've got to fix the plan for it. | 01:24:23 | |
| I don't think that this meets the test as far as effectively. | 01:24:26 | |
| That's just my thank you. | 01:24:32 | |
| My name is Clyde Harrelson. I live off of Buck Creek, so I'm a. | 01:24:39 | |
| Couple miles from the place. | 01:24:42 | |
| But I shot that area. I shot the bank. | 01:24:44 | |
| Why do we need apartments in an area? | 01:24:47 | |
| That has no apartments in it whatsoever. | 01:24:50 | |
| And my main complaint that you all could use or the main complaint you could use is the parking. | 01:24:52 | |
| Who has 1.8 vehicles in a home? | 01:24:57 | |
| They're going to have two-bedroom apartments in there, 45 of them. | 01:25:00 | |
| They'll have at least two cars, if not 3. | 01:25:04 | |
| We went from three cars to two. | 01:25:07 | |
| Just recently, but prior to that, we've always had three vehicles in our family. | 01:25:09 | |
| And I think for no other reason, the parking. | 01:25:13 | |
| Should turn this down if they put in a bank where there's a. | 01:25:16 | |
| Three banks across the street. | 01:25:19 | |
| Why do we need another bank here? | 01:25:21 | |
| They're just they don't want to make the parking. | 01:25:24 | |
| Fit that place because they're not going to make as much money. | 01:25:26 | |
| But if they need to drop that another 50. | 01:25:30 | |
| Units just to make the parking fee. | 01:25:33 | |
| Clyde, sorry, before you leave, what's your address please? | 01:25:36 | |
| 4059 Tanglewood Dr. | 01:25:39 | |
| South of Buck Creek. | 01:25:41 | |
| All right. Thank you. Glad. | 01:25:43 | |
| OK, great. Ladies first. | 01:25:46 | |
| Theresa Temple, 3 to 5 Tuscany Drive. | 01:25:49 | |
| Boys knobs. | 01:25:52 | |
| You turn down Don's. | 01:25:55 | |
| Approval for apartment staff in 2014, did you not? | 01:25:57 | |
| And he offered. | 01:26:00 | |
| To build our homes. | 01:26:02 | |
| 55 and older. | 01:26:03 | |
| Didn't workout. | 01:26:05 | |
| Now it's all families, which is fine. | 01:26:06 | |
| They're supposed to be single family dwellings. Ends up being. | 01:26:08 | |
| One family that has three families living in it. | 01:26:12 | |
| And then the drainage. | 01:26:15 | |
| Back behind where you got. | 01:26:16 | |
| The 301 start with 301. | 01:26:19 | |
| All the way down past where Donnie lives because he lives in our subdivision. | 01:26:22 | |
| All that drainage back there, their yards are all wet all the time. | 01:26:26 | |
| They're never, they're never dry. | 01:26:30 | |
| Florence Hampton had to pick up. | 01:26:32 | |
| All her flips. | 01:26:34 | |
| Stuff in the backyard because it wouldn't have them and stick or grow. | 01:26:36 | |
| Anyway, you're turning down in 2014 for apartments. | 01:26:39 | |
| Turning down again, I like Donnie. | 01:26:41 | |
| He builds a really good homes. | 01:26:44 | |
| In our subdivision. | 01:26:46 | |
| And he hasn't finished what he needs to do. | 01:26:48 | |
| And we know that the grocery store will have a small JC store if you all well know. | 01:26:50 | |
| Now it can't. It can't accommodate all these people. | 01:26:55 | |
| You know. | 01:26:58 | |
| Make a strip mall like he promised. He said he was going to do our a medical stability or something to that effect. But apartments | 01:26:59 | |
| are only going to cause more crime. You know, one of the things the Floyd County Sheriff's told me. | 01:27:04 | |
| That our subdivision was one of the safest subdivisions. | 01:27:09 | |
| Because Tuscany draft. | 01:27:13 | |
| Was one way in and one way out. | 01:27:14 | |
| Do you not agree with that? | 01:27:17 | |
| And now you're getting. | 01:27:19 | |
| All these intersections. | 01:27:20 | |
| Criminals are coming across the bridge. | 01:27:22 | |
| Coming in all of our subdivisions. | 01:27:24 | |
| Because they've got all these little exits to go through. | 01:27:26 | |
| Yeah, I'm not right. | 01:27:29 | |
| I mean, it's true. | 01:27:31 | |
| And we've had several cars broken into even in our subject. | 01:27:32 | |
| Donnie's head stuff stolen from his subdivision, but. | 01:27:35 | |
| You know, you just can't keep building all this. | 01:27:39 | |
| Apartments and it's just gonna bring our. | 01:27:41 | |
| Our values down. | 01:27:44 | |
| And we don't want to. We just don't want it. | 01:27:45 | |
| All right. Thank you. | 01:27:47 | |
| We got we got a minute left. Go ahead, Sir. | 01:27:52 | |
| My name is Spencer Worth and I live at 8040 Schriever. | 01:27:54 | |
| You don't have to. | 01:27:57 | |
| Forgive me for my quick talk, my quick speaking. | 01:27:58 | |
| I agree with many of the points brought up by those behind me. | 01:28:01 | |
| But one thing that I feel like hasn't been brought up is, or at least expounded upon, is the parking. | 01:28:04 | |
| So if if the parking is not enough is not 2 1/2 per unit which my wife and I. | 01:28:09 | |
| Have never had less than two cars. | 01:28:15 | |
| Since we've been married. | 01:28:17 | |
| Where are these industry cars going to go? | 01:28:18 | |
| They're gonna be parking in these neighborhoods next door. | 01:28:20 | |
| And people are that we don't know people who ties the community. | 01:28:22 | |
| Are we walking through our neighborhoods back and forth? | 01:28:26 | |
| And we have no recourse whatsoever. | 01:28:28 | |
| Thank you. | 01:28:30 | |
| Thank you. | 01:28:31 | |
| All right, that closes this this portion if the applicant would like to come up. | 01:28:34 | |
| And rebut what was spoken about. | 01:28:39 | |
| You've got 5 minutes. | 01:28:44 | |
| I'll speak very quickly. Just a couple things to deal with. I'm sorry, just a second. | 01:28:47 | |
| Make sure nobody. | 01:28:53 | |
| Yeah, we got opened up for down. Sorry. We just need to make sure to wait downstairs because the elevators out. | 01:28:54 | |
| Do we have anybody downstairs? | 01:29:00 | |
| In opposition? No, Sir. All right. Thank you. No, Sir. | 01:29:02 | |
| Now you go. Thank you. Very, very quickly, a couple things that Mister Emerson brought up and I think it's important to address 1 | 01:29:06 | |
| primarily deals with. | 01:29:11 | |
| The issue pertaining to. | 01:29:17 | |
| Sidewalks, things of that nature and homeowners association keep in mind under the terms of the restrictive covenants with govern | 01:29:19 | |
| that. | 01:29:23 | |
| Homeowners association is not going to be formed till the last light sells. That's in their restrictions. The other piece of it | 01:29:28 | |
| tends to be there is a non remonstrance clause in each of their subdivision restrictions specifically indicates that they would | 01:29:32 | |
| not. | 01:29:37 | |
| Opposed any type of development that Mister Athena would do on adjacent property. | 01:29:42 | |
| Please let let him speak. It's unclear. | 01:29:51 | |
| And there is a non remonstrance clause in that and they all took title subject to that. | 01:29:53 | |
| A couple other items I think are important. Dealing with one gentleman that said he just moved up there, he moved into the | 01:29:58 | |
| Highlands, which is the brand new subdivision, residential and he wanted rural. So again, I take a little exception to that. | 01:30:05 | |
| The other piece that I think is important is. | 01:30:12 | |
| The wide Shriver Road and the issue with regards to the traffic study. | 01:30:15 | |
| It was done, and Mr. Copper Weight will probably talk about this as well, but it was done in anticipation of all of those. | 01:30:19 | |
| Existing. | 01:30:26 | |
| Developments as well as those that are already on the books as well as looking at this. So it's not a matter that they forgot | 01:30:28 | |
| something. All of those developments were taken into consideration when they did that. | 01:30:34 | |
| I'll let Jason speak on several of the other issues, but again, keep in mind that the restrictive governance primarily deal with | 01:30:40 | |
| when that homeowners association is turned over and likewise when the sidewalks are finished when all of them lots of. | 01:30:46 | |
| I do want to hit on the traffic study. Number one. It used to be that the developer would hire a traffic engineer to do the | 01:30:55 | |
| traffic study. That is no longer the case. It is the county that hires the traffic engineer. So the developer has no influence | 01:31:00 | |
| over the over the traffic study or the traffic engineer. | 01:31:05 | |
| When they did their study at that I reviewed they did take into account all of the. | 01:31:11 | |
| There's Gray woods just to the north of Highlander Point. There's a there was a patio home. | 01:31:15 | |
| There were some proposals that were across Open Sins Rd. | 01:31:21 | |
| There were some other things going on in the air. They took all that into account. | 01:31:25 | |
| And of course, the traffic study reflects that the light is in place. | 01:31:28 | |
| The lights not in place today. | 01:31:31 | |
| We acknowledge that there are traffic issues there today. | 01:31:33 | |
| But when the county finishes constructing that light, it's going to be a whole lot better, and the traffic study shows that. | 01:31:36 | |
| Regarding drainage, I touched on that already. | 01:31:45 | |
| Again, you have the most strict drainage ordinance in the region. | 01:31:48 | |
| I think that's it, unless you have any questions. | 01:31:52 | |
| Oh, wait, one more thing. I'm sorry. | 01:31:57 | |
| Under the general commercial zone, your maximum impervious area is 70%. | 01:31:59 | |
| Under the MF at 65%. | 01:32:04 | |
| Under our PUD plan, it is less than 70%. | 01:32:06 | |
| So we're going to be better on drainage just as a baseline. | 01:32:09 | |
| Yeah, last individual be Daniel Moriarty. Daniel did the. | 01:32:13 | |
| Project the design on it. Likewise, he's going to address some of the issues pertaining to the very same project that he's done | 01:32:18 | |
| throughout Indianapolis area as well as other parts of the state. | 01:32:23 | |
| State your name and address please. | 01:32:28 | |
| 3628. | 01:32:30 | |
| Place in Carmel. | 01:32:32 | |
| And obviously I'm not local so I can't speak to traffic issues and things are going on but. | 01:32:33 | |
| I will say they do a lot of these projects around the. | 01:32:39 | |
| Right bargains, though. | 01:32:41 | |
| Westville. | 01:32:42 | |
| South Bend, Fort Wayne, Bluffton. | 01:32:44 | |
| All all around the state. | 01:32:47 | |
| Always the same issues. | 01:32:49 | |
| But the things I consistently see. | 01:32:50 | |
| Number ones, we said traffic. | 01:32:53 | |
| This there's. | 01:32:55 | |
| Things are gonna happen. | 01:32:56 | |
| This ground, regardless of what happens, time, right, something is going to be built by right. | 01:32:57 | |
| That's not going to stop the traffic. | 01:33:02 | |
| No matter what it is, it's gonna. | 01:33:04 | |
| So if there's traffic issues in the area. | 01:33:06 | |
| Those who are not my opinion, not the responsibility of this landowner to solve the. | 01:33:08 | |
| For the county. | 01:33:14 | |
| I mean that this developed something happening on this property. | 01:33:15 | |
| Is something that. | 01:33:19 | |
| Just. | 01:33:21 | |
| Regardless of what it is, they're still going to be, it sounds like. | 01:33:22 | |
| I'm not here for everybody. The issues. | 01:33:25 | |
| So that was one thing. Secondly, I've got six kids, all six of living apartments. | 01:33:28 | |
| Only once been arrested. | 01:33:32 | |
| He lives at home with me right now. | 01:33:33 | |
| So, umm. | 01:33:35 | |
| There's no. | 01:33:36 | |
| Evidence, at least in it. | 01:33:37 | |
| Brand new development. This is a very high quality development and again I was working with a lot of people around the state. | 01:33:39 | |
| The one thing about that the ambulance has been very refreshing. | 01:33:45 | |
| There's a level of quality that they brought to this development. | 01:33:48 | |
| Is very much higher. | 01:33:51 | |
| Than what I hear from. | 01:33:52 | |
| Every other builder on the state. | 01:33:54 | |
| I'm not, I'm not just saying. | 01:33:55 | |
| That's true. So. | 01:33:57 | |
| So what happens? | 01:33:58 | |
| Rent levels are such. | 01:33:59 | |
| That if you want to say. | 01:34:01 | |
| At least, and I'm sure some people know a lot better than I do, but I don't believe that just. | 01:34:03 | |
| Those higher rent values necessarily bring crime with them. | 01:34:07 | |
| The other thing is the missing middle missing gap. | 01:34:12 | |
| For someone said there's no apartments in the area. | 01:34:14 | |
| Well, kids need apartments. Younger people need apartments to make the transition from school where they had. | 01:34:17 | |
| Ones to eventually have. | 01:34:23 | |
| And if you don't have that high quality piece within your community? | 01:34:25 | |
| Again, just watching it elsewhere. | 01:34:30 | |
| That's that's it. That's. | 01:34:32 | |
| Thank you very much. | 01:34:35 | |
| Thank you. | 01:34:36 | |
| No, Sir, you can't. I'm sorry. | 01:34:40 | |
| I don't make the rules I thought. I try to follow them, Sir. | 01:34:43 | |
| OK. | 01:34:47 | |
| At that point, we're done with the petitions rebuttal. At this time, we're looking for ballots. | 01:34:49 | |
| Unless you all have any questions. Unless you have any questions. | 01:34:57 | |
| Questions. | 01:35:00 | |
| Today, understand what our information is as far as. | 01:35:03 | |
| Go ahead. I'd just like to make a couple notes. I know there was concern that they did not receive certified mail. | 01:35:14 | |
| The the requirement for that is 2 lots. | 01:35:21 | |
| Adjacent. | 01:35:24 | |
| From the project site, so if you did not receive the mail. | 01:35:25 | |
| Within 22 lots of that site. | 01:35:31 | |
| It was sent. | 01:35:34 | |
| We do have the the green cards to verify that. | 01:35:35 | |
| Regarding the traffic pattern that was brought up. | 01:35:39 | |
| In dot controls the old Vincennes at 150 intersection and they do have plans to. | 01:35:43 | |
| With projects to correct the issue at that. | 01:35:50 | |
| That's about $7,000,000 I think what the project came in the. | 01:35:54 | |
| Schreiber Road and Old Vincent's light construction is set to start. | 01:36:00 | |
| Beginning of March for that project. | 01:36:05 | |
| And. | 01:36:09 | |
| The traffic study does account for all the other developments proposed in the area. | 01:36:11 | |
| The sheriff was a part of the TRC meeting. | 01:36:17 | |
| And noted that he had no concerns with public safety standpoint from this project. | 01:36:20 | |
| All right. Does anybody have any other questions for Nick, please? | 01:36:26 | |
| Hold it. | 01:36:31 | |
| No. | 01:36:34 | |
| There is a process that they are following. | 01:36:36 | |
| Go ahead, Nick. | 01:36:40 | |
| No, I had a question if Nick could also elaborate to. | 01:36:42 | |
| To the audience there. | 01:36:46 | |
| That there's also projects. | 01:36:50 | |
| On the table right now. | 01:36:52 | |
| Right behind Jacques and a light that's going in on 150 between Luther and. | 01:36:55 | |
| Open Sense. | 01:37:02 | |
| You're gonna, you're just gonna stop. As soon as you come off the Interstate, you're gonna stop. | 01:37:04 | |
| 123. | 01:37:09 | |
| 4-5. | 01:37:12 | |
| Six times between there and Napleton Rd. | 01:37:13 | |
| Well. | 01:37:21 | |
| They're working on. | 01:37:22 | |
| It's it's happening right now. There is a. | 01:37:23 | |
| Study. | 01:37:27 | |
| We have submitted an RFP for preliminary engineering for a light between. | 01:37:28 | |
| Lutheran old consens for a connection. | 01:37:34 | |
| To the Highlander Point area in there. | 01:37:37 | |
| And one final note. | 01:37:41 | |
| This property is currently zoned General Commercial. | 01:37:42 | |
| Traffic for general commercial uses. | 01:37:46 | |
| Are typically higher than. | 01:37:49 | |
| Multifamily or any other residential use. | 01:37:51 | |
| So. | 01:37:54 | |
| What would be allowed by right? | 01:37:55 | |
| Could likely have a greater impact on the traffic than what this proposal would suggest. | 01:37:57 | |
| Right. | 01:38:03 | |
| All right, all right. | 01:38:05 | |
| May have to ask people to just. | 01:38:08 | |
| All right. At this time, no other board questions. | 01:38:16 | |
| OK. | 01:38:20 | |
| Nick, you want to? | 01:38:22 | |
| Nick, you want you want to just go through the process just one more time on the agenda items as far as. | 01:38:27 | |
| Which one of these items is? | 01:38:33 | |
| The options of the board so they. | 01:38:36 | |
| Clearly understand so the rezoning requests in the PUD rezone. | 01:38:38 | |
| Our recommendations to the. | 01:38:43 | |
| County commissioners. | 01:38:46 | |
| So that just sorry, I want to make sure. I think they want a little direction too. So that would be your docket item ending in O2. | 01:38:48 | |
| And that's the rezone. | 01:38:54 | |
| And your docket item ending in 04 is your put correct? | 01:38:56 | |
| Go ahead. And 03 is the major subdivision. | 01:39:01 | |
| Huh. And then docket item 05 is the detailed development plan. | 01:39:04 | |
| Associated with the. | 01:39:08 | |
| OK. | 01:39:10 | |
| OK, everybody. | 01:39:12 | |
| Claire So in, two in. | 01:39:14 | |
| For both favorable, unfavorable or no recommendation. | 01:39:16 | |
| And then the other two ending in three and five would be granting or denying. | 01:39:21 | |
| Any questions on those and? | 01:39:28 | |
| One ballot at a time. So you're going to start with the O2, start with O2. | 01:39:30 | |
| All right, we need a ballot from somebody, please. Docket FC01-25-02, Petitioner, theme and group. | 01:39:34 | |
| Decision. | 01:39:41 | |
| After careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission finds that one. | 01:39:42 | |
| Rezoning of subject property is consistent with Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 01:39:47 | |
| Because the Conflict County Comprehensive Plan identifies the area. | 01:39:52 | |
| As commercial growth area. | 01:39:55 | |
| Rose planned unit development will be. | 01:39:57 | |
| Mixed-use featuring a commercial element nearest to Old Vincent's Road. | 01:40:00 | |
| Additionally, rezoning is consistent with. | 01:40:05 | |
| Smart growth principles identified in the pan. | 01:40:07 | |
| Specifically, mixed land uses compact building design. | 01:40:10 | |
| Creating a range of housing opportunities. | 01:40:13 | |
| Directing development towards existing communities and preserving open space, farmland, natural beauty and critical environment | 01:40:16 | |
| areas. | 01:40:19 | |
| As this is an infill development. | 01:40:23 | |
| #2. | 01:40:25 | |
| The rezoning of subject property is consistent with the current conditions. | 01:40:27 | |
| And the character of the current structures and uses in the area because commercial uses. | 01:40:30 | |
| At the front of the. | 01:40:35 | |
| The lot are consistent with the original general commercial zoning. | 01:40:36 | |
| The multiplication. | 01:40:40 | |
| The multifamily uses are appropriate. | 01:40:43 | |
| Transitional uses between general commercial and urban residential uses. | 01:40:46 | |
| Building facade materials are to be brick and Hardy board. | 01:40:51 | |
| Structures are within the height limits. | 01:40:54 | |
| Of the Flower County zoning ordinance. | 01:40:56 | |
| And there there is another three story building in the vicinity. | 01:40:59 | |
| #3 The rezoning of subject property is necessary for the most desirable use of the land. | 01:41:03 | |
| Because the rezoning follows smart growth principles already noted. | 01:41:08 | |
| It also provides additional housing identified as needed in the Purdue Housing Report. | 01:41:12 | |
| The county had completed in 2020. | 01:41:17 | |
| Is a mixed-use infill development. | 01:41:19 | |
| In the commercial growth area? | 01:41:22 | |
| #4 the rezoning of subject property. | 01:41:23 | |
| Will not be interest to the value of other properties in the area. | 01:41:26 | |
| Because commercial uses are consistent with general commercial zoning and appropriate adjacent to residential urban zoning and | 01:41:30 | |
| uses. | 01:41:33 | |
| The addition of a multi family component will support local business customer base. | 01:41:37 | |
| The development will increase the value. | 01:41:42 | |
| Of the lot itself and is expected to have positive impacts. | 01:41:45 | |
| On neighboring commercial lots. | 01:41:48 | |
| The buffer yard alone. | 01:41:50 | |
| Adjacent residential lots are provided to the West. Additional buffering is recommended for the properties on the South. | 01:41:52 | |
| The rezoning of subject property will support. | 01:41:59 | |
| Responsible growth and development in the area. | 01:42:02 | |
| Rezoning follows the objectives of smart growth outlined in the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 01:42:04 | |
| Higher density development is directed towards existing infrastructure. | 01:42:10 | |
| Provider Provider letters indicate ability to serve the development is in. | 01:42:14 | |
| The identified commercial growth area and is in the infill development. | 01:42:20 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Penny Commission hereby makes a favorable recommendation. | 01:42:24 | |
| On the petitioner zoning. | 01:42:30 | |
| Amendment application at the meeting held on the 10th of February 2025. | 01:42:32 | |
| A favorable recommendation is based on the following written commencement. | 01:42:37 | |
| Buffer Yard 2 standards will be met on all adjoining residential properties. | 01:42:41 | |
| Trick #2 Drainage will be Floyd County storm water standards as approved by the Storm Water Board. | 01:42:46 | |
| #3A phase lot 1 will be developed first and a schedule of completion for the project will be provided by the applicant. | 01:42:52 | |
| That completes my ballot. | 01:42:59 | |
| OK, we have a ballot. I need a second. | 01:43:02 | |
| No second. | 01:43:25 | |
| That I need a ballot. | 01:43:27 | |
| By somebody that's not approving this ballot. | 01:43:29 | |
| You need to fill one out. | 01:43:31 | |
| I can't do it. | 01:43:33 | |
| What was the question? | 01:43:42 | |
| Mr. Vice President. | 01:43:44 | |
| Somebody need somebody will need to complete a ballot. | 01:43:49 | |
| Otherwise you can have discussion on the first one if you want to at this point. | 01:43:58 | |
| Go from there. | 01:44:03 | |
| But. | 01:44:04 | |
| Nations from out for conversations. | 01:44:10 | |
| Yeah. I mean, you guys can discuss it. You can. | 01:44:13 | |
| The only thing that would not require bouts unfavorable recommend or sorry, no recommendation that would not have a ballot with | 01:44:16 | |
| us. | 01:44:19 | |
| It's favorable, unfavorable, or no recommendation. | 01:44:24 | |
| I was listening correct because you wouldn't have a ballot with no recommendation. | 01:44:28 | |
| OK, so somebody makes needs to make a motion. | 01:44:33 | |
| That's the path that somebody wants, OK? | 01:44:36 | |
| So I think once again, that's why we kind of went through and explained so. | 01:44:38 | |
| Obviously, Mr. Bible Hauser has a ballot with a favorable. | 01:44:41 | |
| We either need somebody with an unfavorable or no recommendation at all. | 01:44:45 | |
| Unfavorable takes a ballot. No recommendation would not be a ballot, so no recommendation does not take about. | 01:44:51 | |
| I'll make a motion for no recommendation to the Board Commission. | 01:44:57 | |
| Could place place. Please respect what we're trying to get accomplished here. I beg you. | 01:45:01 | |
| If you cannot be quiet, you need to leave the room please. Thank you. | 01:45:07 | |
| OK, so I have I have a motion for no recommendation correct? | 01:45:11 | |
| I need a second. | 01:45:16 | |
| I need a second. | 01:45:24 | |
| I will second that motion. | 01:45:26 | |
| OK, have a second. | 01:45:27 | |
| Any discussion? | 01:45:29 | |
| Yeah, I'm just not qualified to do this unfavorable ballot. I'm. | 01:45:31 | |
| Totally opposed to this. I don't know why we're making an adjustment to this zoning to our. | 01:45:35 | |
| Residents of that area. | 01:45:40 | |
| But to put me to. | 01:45:46 | |
| Could do this ballot. I'm just not qualified. I mean, it's so detailed, so complex, just what they went through. | 01:45:48 | |
| I think it's a process. OK. So do you want to fill out an unfavorable? | 01:45:55 | |
| Not or you want to vote for. | 01:46:01 | |
| No recommendation. | 01:46:03 | |
| Maybe if we can re. | 01:46:04 | |
| Revisit this another meeting, give me time to prepare for it. That's not possible. We've got three options and we're going to | 01:46:06 | |
| leave the room with 1/3 so. | 01:46:10 | |
| I'm not qualified to do this. | 01:46:13 | |
| Unfavorable. Sort of. | 01:46:17 | |
| I have a motion. I have a second. | 01:46:18 | |
| We had discussion all in favor. | 01:46:20 | |
| Signify for I. | 01:46:22 | |
| Aye, aye. | 01:46:24 | |
| There's three. That's for no recommendation at all. | 01:46:26 | |
| So you had three, so you do not have enough to support a no recommendation. So there needs to be a ballot. | 01:46:31 | |
| That is prepared or a. | 01:46:36 | |
| Vote in favor. You have to have a majority vote. | 01:46:38 | |
| Call again. So no recommendation. | 01:46:45 | |
| Everybody understands what's going on there. That goes to the ministers, they make the decision so. | 01:46:48 | |
| You could make an unfavorable. | 01:46:53 | |
| And vote unanimous. All that still goes to the Commission. | 01:46:55 | |
| Makes the commissioners make the decision so. | 01:46:58 | |
| In order to for us to finish this meeting tonight, we have to have a vote. | 01:47:01 | |
| So can I put it up for one more time? | 01:47:06 | |
| Somebody else can make a motion, yes. | 01:47:09 | |
| Can I review this? I mean how complex is this? | 01:47:12 | |
| I know I'm not qualified, but I mean, can we just put up a? | 01:47:15 | |
| Vote unfavorable how details is going to be you have. | 01:47:19 | |
| Ballot and bring your motion with. | 01:47:22 | |
| Your ballot. | 01:47:25 | |
| But you can take time to fill out and do, but it does. | 01:47:27 | |
| Be brought and then a second to that. | 01:47:29 | |
| Vote on that ballot. | 01:47:32 | |
| Not an answer question. We're we. | 01:47:35 | |
| We're not supposed to answer questions, but hold on a second. | 01:47:52 | |
| Once again, what we're trying to do here is we've got favorable, unfavorable. | 01:47:55 | |
| Or no recommendation. So that's what we're trying to get through right now, so. | 01:47:59 | |
| Let it give us time to get through this place. | 01:48:02 | |
| Yes. All right, I'll make a motion is. | 01:48:06 | |
| I'll make a motion and no recommendation. | 01:48:10 | |
| I'll second. | 01:48:13 | |
| We have a second. | 01:48:15 | |
| Any other discussion? | 01:48:16 | |
| All in favor. | 01:48:18 | |
| For no recommendation signify by aye. | 01:48:19 | |
| Ah, those opposed. | 01:48:23 | |
| All right, all right. | 01:48:24 | |
| OK, so it's two, it passes. | 01:48:26 | |
| Good. Five, Yeah, OK. | 01:48:28 | |
| So it's going to the Commission with no recommendation. So I'll get to visit Michelle. Let me let me show a hands who said yes. | 01:48:30 | |
| No recommendations. No recommendation? Sure. | 01:48:37 | |
| 12345 So we've got enough, correct that is correct. | 01:48:39 | |
| So that passes. | 01:48:44 | |
| OK, so now agenda item. | 01:48:45 | |
| Number. | 01:48:48 | |
| 4/3 right? | 01:48:51 | |
| Excuse me, Sir. What? | 01:48:55 | |
| We all right, go ahead. | 01:48:57 | |
| I'm looking for a ballot. | 01:49:00 | |
| For agenda item number. | 01:49:01 | |
| 433. | 01:49:05 | |
| 3 Umm. | 01:49:07 | |
| Even though we got no recommendation here, you still want to all tied together. That's what I Nick, have you. Yeah. | 01:49:08 | |
| Make a contingent on commissioners approval. | 01:49:20 | |
| Yeah, I mean. | 01:49:22 | |
| Well, the the subdivisions. | 01:49:26 | |
| Ministerial. | 01:49:28 | |
| Correct. | 01:49:29 | |
| So if the Mr. standards, then you. | 01:49:31 | |
| Child permit. So for that work they want to table it. | 01:49:33 | |
| If the applicant wishes to table until commissioners make a decision, otherwise you guys would, it would be up to you and it's | 01:49:39 | |
| ministerial, so if they meet all the requirements it has to be approved. | 01:49:43 | |
| With you can make a condition contingent on the commissioners approval of the rezone, though obviously other than that if they | 01:49:48 | |
| meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance it has to be approved. | 01:49:52 | |
| The question is just do you want to table it until a decision is made by the commissioners or do you want a do you want the board | 01:50:01 | |
| to go ahead and vote on it this evening? | 01:50:05 | |
| OK. | 01:50:09 | |
| So that you guys are left with the ballot for that. | 01:50:10 | |
| Which is agenda item 4 but. | 01:50:15 | |
| Docket ending in 03 is a grant or deny that subdivision. | 01:50:17 | |
| Again, is ministerial in nature as long as they meet the zoning ordinance. | 01:50:21 | |
| With that though, I would. | 01:50:24 | |
| Recommend subject subject to the Commissioners approval. | 01:50:26 | |
| Zoning change which is reference that docket number, I think will be helpful. | 01:50:30 | |
| OK. So just for everybody on the board, if you get a ballot that's in favor of this? | 01:50:34 | |
| We put us, we put a condition on it. | 01:50:39 | |
| That it's subject to the commissioners, correct? So if the commissioners don't approve that, then it would not be approved. All | 01:50:42 | |
| right, so I need, I need a ballot for agenda item item number 4. | 01:50:46 | |
| #4. | 01:50:51 | |
| Well, it's agenda item 4. It's agenda item 4, Docket three. Yeah, Docket 3. | 01:50:54 | |
| Docket FCO 1-25-03. | 01:51:10 | |
| Number one, petitioner has met all the following requirements. | 01:51:16 | |
| So he's met all the requirements for. | 01:51:20 | |
| Preliminary plan provided. | 01:51:24 | |
| Certification demonstrating idem. | 01:51:26 | |
| Platt provided geotechnical report staff. | 01:51:29 | |
| Traffic Study. | 01:51:33 | |
| The lots working. | 01:51:36 | |
| And compliance. | 01:51:38 | |
| The streets. | 01:51:40 | |
| Item I Streets are in compliance. J Sidewalks are in compliance #2 Petitioner has met. | 01:51:41 | |
| The following requirements for drainage and storm water. | 01:51:48 | |
| #3 The petitioner has provided a letter confirming. | 01:51:52 | |
| Confirming availability and willingness to serve for all necessary utilities. Lloyd Water Company, Georgetown Fire Department. | 01:51:56 | |
| Harrison REMC, New Albany Wastewater. | 01:52:04 | |
| At T and Charter. | 01:52:08 | |
| #4 Petitioner has met the following requirements for sewer and or septic. | 01:52:10 | |
| Service for the development we provided by New Albany Wastewater. | 01:52:14 | |
| Decision. | 01:52:22 | |
| Upon careful review, the boy county. | 01:52:25 | |
| Planning Commissioner right grants the petitioner. | 01:52:27 | |
| Primary approval for a major subdivision at the meeting held on the 10th of February 2025. Primary approval is based on completion | 01:52:30 | |
| of fine conditions. | 01:52:35 | |
| Final Approval The drainage stormwater plans are required prior to secondary approval. | 01:52:39 | |
| The number of apartments. | 01:52:45 | |
| For this development shall not exceed 125 units. | 01:52:47 | |
| And this. | 01:52:53 | |
| This approval is subject to. | 01:52:57 | |
| Contingent is contingent upon. | 01:53:00 | |
| The the planning. | 01:53:09 | |
| The commissioners approving the previous one, right? | 01:53:12 | |
| FC is put down FC. | 01:53:16 | |
| This is contingent upon. | 01:53:18 | |
| FC01. | 01:53:20 | |
| I will just hold on there, OK. | 01:53:22 | |
| FCO One. | 01:53:34 | |
| 2502, that's right, yeah. | 01:53:36 | |
| This is contingent upon the Commissioner's approval of FCO 1-25-02 that completes my ballot. | 01:53:41 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. I need a any discussion. | 01:53:49 | |
| I need a second. | 01:53:53 | |
| I'll second. | 01:53:54 | |
| We have a second. All in favor signify by aye. | 01:53:55 | |
| All right, all right, let me see. A show of hands and said aye. | 01:53:59 | |
| OK, let the record show that there was a majority more than 5. | 01:54:03 | |
| That passes. | 01:54:07 | |
| Once again, that is subject to the Commissioners approval. | 01:54:10 | |
| Of the zoning map. | 01:54:12 | |
| All right, you got agenda item number 5. | 01:54:14 | |
| FC-01-25-04. | 01:54:18 | |
| On this one, Nick, this would go from the multifamily to the PUD though, so I think at this time. | 01:54:25 | |
| Would the applicant want to table that one? Because. | 01:54:31 | |
| I mean, it wasn't. | 01:54:35 | |
| Obviously the recommendation. There's no recommendation from. | 01:54:36 | |
| Commercial to multifamily. | 01:54:39 | |
| I still you have 8 will be back in the morning. | 01:54:42 | |
| Unfavorable, OK. | 01:54:47 | |
| OK. All right. | 01:54:49 | |
| All right, so confirming that's OK with you so. | 01:54:51 | |
| Is there any on a body on the board that wants to make no recommendation motion or is there a ballot from somebody? | 01:54:53 | |
| Anybody. | 01:55:02 | |
| Which one is this for? This is the one that. | 01:55:04 | |
| PUD. | 01:55:09 | |
| It's #4. | 01:55:10 | |
| It's it's it's agenda file. | 01:55:14 | |
| So your options again are favorable, unfavorable, both of those require ballots or no recommendation. | 01:55:19 | |
| So, and this is on 04. | 01:55:31 | |
| This is yes. | 01:55:33 | |
| Huh. | 01:55:37 | |
| The first part of this thing. | 01:55:46 | |
| It's all up to you. | 01:55:47 | |
| So all I have to say. | 01:55:49 | |
| Officer, can't we start? | 01:55:51 | |
| Multiple pages in correct? | 01:55:53 | |
| Yes, page 4. | 01:55:55 | |
| All right, all right, That's OK. | 01:56:01 | |
| We have three options. | 01:56:06 | |
| I know the proposed. | 01:56:07 | |
| Planned unit development does very does significantly. | 01:56:10 | |
| Does vary significant from the zoning and subdivision control regulation concerning density, parking and buffering? | 01:56:14 | |
| Yard #1 #2. | 01:56:20 | |
| The closed land use and the. | 01:56:23 | |
| In the planned unit development. | 01:56:25 | |
| Are not in conflict. | 01:56:27 | |
| With spirit and the intent of the comprehensive. | 01:56:29 | |
| Plants surrounding land use and zoning district. | 01:56:32 | |
| #3 the proposed. | 01:56:36 | |
| HUD does provide adequate public service like air traffic control. | 01:56:38 | |
| Open and. | 01:56:44 | |
| Common space and recreation. | 01:56:45 | |
| #4. | 01:56:48 | |
| The planned unit development is compatible with the adjacent properties and surrounding neighborhoods. | 01:56:49 | |
| #5. | 01:56:55 | |
| The proposed planned unit development will not interfere with the use or diminish the values of adjacent properties and | 01:56:56 | |
| surrounding neighborhood. | 01:57:00 | |
| Number six, the proposed planned unit development will not diminish the level of service. | 01:57:04 | |
| For roadway systems in the vicinity. | 01:57:09 | |
| #7. | 01:57:12 | |
| The plan you development can't be immediately and adequately served by existing public facilities. | 01:57:13 | |
| #8. | 01:57:20 | |
| Planned unit development does preserve natural and historic resources to extent possible. | 01:57:21 | |
| #9 The planned unit development will not be interest to the public health and safety and general welfare. | 01:57:27 | |
| #10 The written commitments will be required. The applicant shall provide a schedule for phasing the construction of the project. | 01:57:33 | |
| A schedule for the completion of all phases. | 01:57:37 | |
| We'll provide it to the Planning Commission. | 01:57:42 | |
| #11. | 01:57:44 | |
| The petitioner will be. | 01:57:46 | |
| Required. | 01:57:48 | |
| To meet conditions. | 01:57:49 | |
| Please specify those conditions a the number of apartments of development. | 01:57:51 | |
| Shall not exceed 125 units. | 01:57:56 | |
| Be for secondary approval, provide additional screening of dumpster on. | 01:57:59 | |
| Dumpster. | 01:58:03 | |
| On lot 1 between dumpsters and roadway provided light at entrance. | 01:58:04 | |
| Locations where there are none. | 01:58:10 | |
| Meet suffer buffer zone. | 01:58:12 | |
| Buffer Yard 2 standards. | 01:58:15 | |
| For adjoining residential youth on the South side. | 01:58:17 | |
| With a ball. | 01:58:21 | |
| That completes my appointment. That's not complete my brother. | 01:58:25 | |
| I gotta read something over here. | 01:58:29 | |
| Upon careful review, the Floyd County Planning Commission hereby. | 01:58:31 | |
| Makes a favorable recommendation to the County Commissioner concerning the petitioner planned unit development at the beating held | 01:58:34 | |
| on the 10th of February, 2025. | 01:58:38 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. | 01:58:44 | |
| Any discussion on that ballot? | 01:58:46 | |
| I need a second. | 01:58:48 | |
| I'll second. | 01:58:51 | |
| We do have a second. | 01:58:52 | |
| Any further discussion if none? | 01:58:54 | |
| We need a vote all signify that agreed by aye. | 01:58:57 | |
| Aye. | 01:59:00 | |
| Those opposed. | 01:59:02 | |
| Aye. | 01:59:03 | |
| All right, well, let's say this show of hands and approve it. | 01:59:04 | |
| Which one are you doing? | 01:59:08 | |
| 4. | 01:59:10 | |
| Just making sure I heard you right. | 01:59:11 | |
| 1234. | 01:59:13 | |
| OK. | 01:59:15 | |
| All right. | 01:59:16 | |
| So if we need somebody to do. | 01:59:19 | |
| I will adjust. | 01:59:22 | |
| Ballot. | 01:59:24 | |
| To no recommendation. | 01:59:25 | |
| So you're just bringing a motion for number? Yeah, it's not your ballot. | 01:59:28 | |
| Well, it's on here to 2nd, make no recommendation. | 01:59:31 | |
| Ending ending Commissioner approval. | 01:59:35 | |
| Is is it just no recommendation or is it? | 01:59:40 | |
| Automatically pending Commissioner approval. | 01:59:43 | |
| It goes to commissioners regardless. | 01:59:47 | |
| OK, I'll second that. | 01:59:49 | |
| OK, so we have a motion for. | 01:59:52 | |
| No recommendation. | 01:59:55 | |
| Correct, and you're seconded. | 01:59:57 | |
| Any discussion? | 01:59:59 | |
| OK, all in favor, say bye. | 02:00:01 | |
| Raise hands, please. So we got it on record. | 02:00:03 | |
| OK, we do have 5 or above so that does pass. | 02:00:06 | |
| All right. Thank you. | 02:00:09 | |
| All right, it passes no recommendation. | 02:00:12 | |
| All right, the last. | 02:00:17 | |
| Is agenda item 6. | 02:00:21 | |
| Which is FC. | 02:00:24 | |
| 01 Dash, 2505. | 02:00:25 | |
| I thought that's what we just did. No, I didn't. | 02:00:28 | |
| I don't know if that was the floor. Huh. It was all four. | 02:00:31 | |
| It didn't read. | 02:00:37 | |
| Yeah, 'cause that's. | 02:00:41 | |
| Yeah, that should have signatures. | 02:00:42 | |
| Because that should have that as a no recommendation, shouldn't have signatures on it, right? | 02:00:47 | |
| That one does. | 02:00:53 | |
| Hey, Nick. | 02:00:55 | |
| I'm all confused at this point guys. | 02:00:58 | |
| The 04 ballot has no recommendation but still has a ballot which? | 02:01:02 | |
| Are you OK with that? | 02:01:06 | |
| Yeah. | 02:01:08 | |
| You vote, you voted on it. | 02:01:10 | |
| Recommendation. | 02:01:12 | |
| Do you have, do you have agenda item 5? Is that what you? Yeah, that's fine. That's still fine. | 02:01:15 | |
| You just read Ballot. | 02:01:22 | |
| Agenda item. | 02:01:26 | |
| Agenda item 5 + 4. | 02:01:28 | |
| Gotcha. OK. That was the one you just read. | 02:01:30 | |
| You read it. | 02:01:33 | |
| Where's it at? | 02:01:35 | |
| That's when we just. That's what I just read. | 02:01:37 | |
| Yeah, I don't think that's right. I'm confused. | 02:01:41 | |
| Nick, you want help a second. | 02:01:43 | |
| You skipped. | 02:01:49 | |
| Is this right? | 02:01:51 | |
| You have the first 3. | 02:01:54 | |
| Here we go, you're saying? | 02:01:57 | |
| You want an 05 now, right? Correct. | 02:01:59 | |
| That's the one we're on now. | 02:02:01 | |
| We have to. | 02:02:07 | |
| Did we approve this one? | 02:02:09 | |
| OK, so we're on. | 02:02:11 | |
| That's right. | 02:02:23 | |
| Do we need to finish signing that? | 02:02:26 | |
| I need it and I'll move it on. | 02:02:30 | |
| OK. All right. | 02:02:35 | |
| So, so Nick on this development plan, I mean, if we're voting no recommendation on. | 02:02:36 | |
| O2 and 04. | 02:02:40 | |
| How? How do we How do we vote on it? | 02:02:41 | |
| On both O2. | 02:02:45 | |
| That's right. | 02:02:47 | |
| Yeah, I got a sign. | 02:02:49 | |
| I bet so that's good. | 02:02:52 | |
| That's alright, you got it. I'm. | 02:02:57 | |
| Hey, I'm good. | 02:03:01 | |
| How do I know what I'm saying? | 02:03:02 | |
| OK, the next we need a ballot for agenda item 6. | 02:03:12 | |
| 05. | 02:03:17 | |
| FC-O125-505. | 02:03:18 | |
| No, I just making sure that. | 02:03:24 | |
| Where's my wife? | 02:03:42 | |
| You guys. | 02:03:48 | |
| This will be. | 02:03:51 | |
| Subject to FC 01. | 02:03:52 | |
| 25. | 02:03:56 | |
| Dash O2. | 02:03:58 | |
| And 04104 1. | 02:04:01 | |
| That's it, You got it. | 02:04:11 | |
| And I still need some. | 02:04:13 | |
| All right, do we have a ballot for Docket FCO 1-25-O5? | 02:04:17 | |
| Conceptual site plan. | 02:04:25 | |
| Review by planning director Yes. | 02:04:27 | |
| Findings #1 Petitioner has met all the veterans standards. | 02:04:29 | |
| For the district #2A waiver for the development standard. | 02:04:33 | |
| Requirement is not required. | 02:04:37 | |
| #3. | 02:04:39 | |
| Proposed development plan is consistent with the Comprehensive plan because the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan identifies the | 02:04:41 | |
| area as a commercial growth area. | 02:04:45 | |
| The proposed planned unit development be mixed-use featuring a commercial element nearest the frontage additional rezoning | 02:04:50 | |
| assistant with the smart growth principles. | 02:04:54 | |
| Identified in the plan, specifically mixed land use. | 02:04:59 | |
| Compact building design, creating a range of housing opportunities, directing development towards existing communities and | 02:05:02 | |
| preserving open space. | 02:05:06 | |
| And critical environmental areas as this is an infill development. | 02:05:11 | |
| #4 The proposed development is consistent with the intent. | 02:05:15 | |
| Of the district has set forth in Boyd County zoning ordinance because it is a multi family planned unit development district. | 02:05:19 | |
| District which allows modifications to underlying district. | 02:05:26 | |
| Standards #4 the proposed development plan. | 02:05:29 | |
| Does satisfy. | 02:05:32 | |
| The following development. | 02:05:33 | |
| Requirements. | 02:05:35 | |
| And there are. | 02:05:36 | |
| A is signage, B is access, C is designed D lighting. | 02:05:37 | |
| Number six, the proposed development is a multi family development development plan does satisfy the requirements for a | 02:05:43 | |
| recreational space and open space by providing a pool and outdoor gaming area. | 02:05:49 | |
| And is less than the 25 acres in Toll area. | 02:05:55 | |
| #7 The proposed developments is located in the Highlander Point District. | 02:05:58 | |
| The following requirements have been met. Building facades or brick. | 02:06:02 | |
| And Harding board there are no loading docks, burden dumpsters located to the side and rear of the buildings. | 02:06:06 | |
| A The building facades that face any adjacent streets have a finished facade. | 02:06:12 | |
| Be loading docks and trash collector bins are not placed on or along the facade that face. | 02:06:17 | |
| Any adjacent streets? | 02:06:22 | |
| See the accommodation is. | 02:06:25 | |
| Is made for community space where a proposal commercial development. | 02:06:27 | |
| Has over 100,000 square feet. | 02:06:32 | |
| Either in combination of buildings or lots and is. | 02:06:34 | |
| A cohesive commercial project or development D. | 02:06:38 | |
| Open space requirements for Section 904. The Fern. | 02:06:41 | |
| Zoning ordinance are met. | 02:06:44 | |
| Decision. This decision is contingent upon Commissioners approval. | 02:06:46 | |
| Of SCO 12502 and FCO 1/25/04. | 02:06:50 | |
| One careful review. The Floyd County Planning Commission hereby approves. | 02:06:54 | |
| The Petition Development Plan review application at the meeting held on the 10th of February 2025. | 02:06:58 | |
| Completes my ballot. | 02:07:04 | |
| All right, we have a ballot. Everybody understands the conditions written on the ballot. | 02:07:06 | |
| I need a second. | 02:07:10 | |
| All right, I've got a second. | 02:07:14 | |
| I would like to. | 02:07:18 | |
| Note that. | 02:07:19 | |
| This detailed improvement detailed. | 02:07:21 | |
| Plan would be contingent upon the rezoning. | 02:07:25 | |
| He said that. | 02:07:29 | |
| Not only as a condition, but as a matter of. | 02:07:31 | |
| Whether it is valid or not. | 02:07:34 | |
| That's why I made a second. | 02:07:37 | |
| There you go. So I have I do have a a second. | 02:07:40 | |
| OK. | 02:07:43 | |
| All right, all in favor signify by aye. | 02:07:46 | |
| Aye, show of hands please, on the eyes. | 02:07:49 | |
| OK, that is. | 02:07:52 | |
| A majority. So that passes. Thank you, Larry. | 02:07:53 | |
| All righty, Nick. | 02:07:57 | |
| Includes the. | 02:07:58 | |
| Agenda items other than we had something on here about the overlay. | 02:08:00 | |
| Can we, can we push, push that down the road? | 02:08:04 | |
| Please I need to. | 02:08:07 | |
| I really need to. | 02:08:10 | |
| I need to. I gotta be honest with you. | 02:08:12 | |
| OK, OK, let's get these signed before we adjourn. | 02:08:16 | |
| Because that is. | 02:08:19 | |
| That is no old business, new business. | 02:08:21 | |
| Complete for tonight. | 02:08:24 | |
| Appreciate advice, patience. | 02:08:26 | |
| Need a motion for adjourned. Yeah, don't, don't leave till you sign though. I need a motion to adjourn motion. | 02:08:29 | |
| OK, any a second so moved. | 02:08:34 | |
| Favor signify by. | 02:08:37 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. | 02:08:39 | |
| Oh. | 02:08:44 |