Floyd County BZA
Live stream not working or buffering in Chrome or Edge?
Troubleshooting steps
In your browser: open Menu (three dots) → Settings → System → turn off “Use graphics acceleration when available.” Then restart the browser.
Transcript
| Some of the chest pressure had about 4:10. | 00:00:00 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 00:00:05 | |
| Neelam. | 00:00:09 | |
| Okay. | 00:00:11 | |
| All right. Good evening, everybody. At this time, we're going to call to order. | 00:00:54 | |
| The December 9th Board of Zoning Appeals. At this time I'd like to stand and do the pledge allegiance. | 00:00:59 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, | 00:01:08 | |
| indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. | 00:01:14 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. All right. This time roll call please. | 00:01:21 | |
| Dear here, here here. | 00:01:26 | |
| Here. | 00:01:30 | |
| All right, just kind of. | 00:01:33 | |
| On just kind of. | 00:01:37 | |
| Housekeeping here. | 00:01:39 | |
| Our Nick Creeby, his wife, is in the middle of having a baby, so Nick's not going to be here tonight. Don is going to stand in for | 00:01:41 | |
| him. | 00:01:45 | |
| Bill White's not here tonight, so I'm actually acting as president. | 00:01:50 | |
| And so you'll just have to put up with a. | 00:01:54 | |
| #2 not #1 so. | 00:01:58 | |
| Try to do the best I can. So at this time we I need a approval for the minutes of November. | 00:02:01 | |
| I have a correction on page 2. OK. | 00:02:08 | |
| I guess fourth line down, says Mr. People, Hauser recused himself from the air ring of property. That wasn't Mr. Bieber Hauser. | 00:02:14 | |
| That was me. | 00:02:18 | |
| So we need to get that changed so. | 00:02:22 | |
| Duly noted. So we have a motion with. | 00:02:26 | |
| Correction. | 00:02:30 | |
| I need a second I'll second. | 00:02:32 | |
| And a second all in favor signify by aye, I cannot vote. I was not here last month, so all right. | 00:02:34 | |
| OK, first item on the agenda is old business agenda item one FC-10-24-44 an administration administrative appeal. And Don, you | 00:02:42 | |
| help us out please. Good evening. Don Lock, director of planning and operations before you is FC Docket 10-24-44. The sporting | 00:02:49 | |
| club at the farm is my understanding talking with staff that notice was to be provided to to the joiners and other property | 00:02:57 | |
| owners. | 00:03:04 | |
| According to Miss Adams, as of the start of the meeting, the petitioners had not provided that notification. | 00:03:12 | |
| So with that. | 00:03:20 | |
| Since 9 was provided to the office and I understand that was part of the requirement, the board has the. | 00:03:23 | |
| Ability our authority to table that matter until they do provide notice or we can speak with Miss Fox on. | 00:03:30 | |
| An alternative method moving forward, but that's not a. | 00:03:39 | |
| As of right now, we do not have notice. | 00:03:44 | |
| So thank you guys. Choose to table it without sufficient notice. Just motion to approve it the table and you can ask them. | 00:03:48 | |
| Do you just, can you just say, can you deny it? | 00:04:00 | |
| Or do you move on? Or do you just table? | 00:04:04 | |
| Oh, I think that's from the. You can ask them if they have that notice but they just come forward. State your name and address for | 00:04:08 | |
| the records. You will Sir, please. | 00:04:11 | |
| Yes, Sir Joe Craig with Sporting Club at the Farm, 7209 Leafland Place, Prospect, KY. We reached out to the office twice two weeks | 00:04:16 | |
| ago. We had not received an updated letter to send out. The only one we had was dated for the November meeting, so we did not | 00:04:23 | |
| receive a new one. And then we got noticed last week from Nick's office saying that they had not gotten noticed from us, that we | 00:04:29 | |
| had not set them out and sent the letters out in time. But we were never provided with a updated letter to send out. | 00:04:35 | |
| OK. All right. Thank you. Thank you. | 00:04:43 | |
| I make a motion that we table it till next month. I'll second. OK, we have a motion a second. I'll signify by the aye aye. Those | 00:04:46 | |
| opposed likewise. All right, stable. Thank you. Sorry for those who made a trip apologize. | 00:04:53 | |
| OK. | 00:05:01 | |
| We'll let we'll let the room clear out for this item. | 00:05:08 | |
| Hey, Cortana, last minute. They were supposed to do that. | 00:05:14 | |
| I understand, yes. | 00:05:18 | |
| Well, they're they're not all. | 00:05:22 | |
| Yep. | 00:05:25 | |
| Looks like they've been done since 2019. | 00:05:28 | |
| All right, next. | 00:05:41 | |
| Next item is item 3 through 7. | 00:05:44 | |
| #3 through 7, correct? | 00:05:50 | |
| I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. | 00:05:53 | |
| My bad, I skipped 1. | 00:05:55 | |
| Next item is agenda item 2. | 00:05:57 | |
| FC-11-24-46 Special exception. | 00:06:02 | |
| Done once again. OK. And just for my edification. | 00:06:08 | |
| Mr. Creeby also provides a staff report upfront as part of his this part of the presentation. | 00:06:15 | |
| All right, so you have DOC and IMF C11-24 dash 46. The petitioner is Aqua Indiana Limber Release Sanitation Sanitary Works, Inc | 00:06:21 | |
| Location is Tanglewood Dr. Floyd Knobs 47119. Tax ID number is 220400700034.000006. The request is for a special exception which | 00:06:31 | |
| is a use variance, an expansion of a legal non conforming use. The district is residential. | 00:06:40 | |
| And so the overview of the. | 00:06:51 | |
| Case or the docket is the applicant is requesting to expand an existing legal non conforming use. The applicant is requesting to | 00:06:54 | |
| build a small office to assist in the operation of the existing wastewater treatment plant bill prior to the implementation of the | 00:07:00 | |
| 2006 Floyd County Zoning ordinance. | 00:07:06 | |
| The office will be a conversion of a manufactured home with a four area of 713 square feet. | 00:07:13 | |
| Adjacent Properties The property is located to the north of Wimberley Woods Subdivision, zoned Rs to the northeast of Charlotte. | 00:07:20 | |
| Charlotte Ridge across Creek to the north and east are rural residential zones, single family lots. Into the West is a rural | 00:07:28 | |
| residential zoned undeveloped lot. | 00:07:34 | |
| Does he go through each annulment of the best so his the staff findings, the special exception will not be injurious to public | 00:07:42 | |
| health, safety, morals and welfare of the community building. | 00:07:49 | |
| Project will facilitate the operation of the utility. The structure will be built Apple to applicable building code and not create | 00:07:56 | |
| any physical hazards to nearby properties. | 00:08:01 | |
| The use of value of the adjacent area adjacent the property subject to the special exception will not be affected in a | 00:08:07 | |
| substantially adverse manner. The site is is the location of the wastewater treatment plant with utility structures. Addition of a | 00:08:13 | |
| small office building will not significantly. | 00:08:18 | |
| Significantly alter the use of property. The need for the special session does arise from us from some condition peculiar to the | 00:08:25 | |
| property involved. The use is a legal, non conforming use since it was constructed before current zoning restrictions apply. The | 00:08:31 | |
| strict application of the zoning of the terms of the Floyd County Zoning Ordinance will result in an unnecessary hardship in the | 00:08:37 | |
| use of the property. | 00:08:43 | |
| Expansion of legal non conforming uses. | 00:08:50 | |
| Require a special exception approval The approval of a special exception will not contradict the goals and objectives of Floyd | 00:08:53 | |
| County Comprehensive Plan. The approval will support the operation of a utility providing adequate infrastructure to the | 00:08:59 | |
| community. Staff Recommendations Maintain wooded screening of the structure from neighborhood neighboring properties. Provide | 00:09:05 | |
| additional vegetation screening of the proposed structure to include Evergreen trees a minimum of 6 feet in height to the | 00:09:11 | |
| structure in any roadway. | 00:09:17 | |
| And that is the staff report. | 00:09:23 | |
| All right, Thank you. Anybody have any questions for Don? No, no, but a question, Christy, because we don't have a full board, we | 00:09:27 | |
| need an offer to make that offer. Yeah, of course. So the applicant does have a right to be heard by the full board if they choose | 00:09:32 | |
| to do so. And that applies for all the agenda items this evening. If you wish to table your item till next month for a full board, | 00:09:38 | |
| you most certainly can do that. You would need to let the board know that prior to them taking the matter under consideration of | 00:09:43 | |
| voting on it. So. | 00:09:48 | |
| If that is something that the applicant wishes to do on any of these agenda items, please let us know. | 00:09:54 | |
| So we can take care of that. | 00:09:59 | |
| Thank you, Christy. | 00:10:01 | |
| No questions for Don. | 00:10:03 | |
| OK. | 00:10:06 | |
| At this at this time the applicant can come forward. | 00:10:07 | |
| State your name and address for the record Sir, please. | 00:10:13 | |
| Yes, Sir, Scott Cycle, Midwestern engineers representing Aqua Indiana and Wimbledon. Wimberley Sanitary Works. | 00:10:17 | |
| I address is 6809 corporate Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46278. | 00:10:26 | |
| I have nothing to add except for specific questions from the board as long as there's a quorum present and the board can. | 00:10:32 | |
| Act on this special exception tonight. I have no issue going to a full board, so as long as that's not an issue. | 00:10:41 | |
| I won't, I won't request to go to so they have everybody can, everybody can vote. | 00:10:50 | |
| Nobody has recused themselves at this point on this agenda and you do have a quorum, which is for it, Desert car, three of them to | 00:10:56 | |
| vote in favor. The other thing that I did want to pass along. | 00:11:01 | |
| In correspondence, we had not submitted, sorry, we had not submitted our orange or these green cards for that yet, but I did want | 00:11:07 | |
| to. | 00:11:12 | |
| I did want to state to this board that there were six that were not returned. One of those was returned as undeliverable, so we | 00:11:21 | |
| did receive the letter back, but the other five we never received a card back from. | 00:11:27 | |
| Are descendant. | 00:11:36 | |
| Right. So as long as you have proof that you sent it, then you're yes. Yeah, we had some. | 00:11:37 | |
| We did send scans of the certified letter receipts and then those green cards in response. | 00:11:46 | |
| Yeah, go ahead, you're finished. Yes, Sir. Any, any questions I'll be happy to answer. | 00:11:57 | |
| OK. This, this building that you're putting up, is that going to be like a mobile home basically or what is it? | 00:12:02 | |
| So it is a pre manufactured unit. | 00:12:13 | |
| We're designing the foundation right now to go through Department of Homeland Security for the foundation release, but it will be | 00:12:17 | |
| delivered and then anchored down to the foundation, which will be a slab foundation. So it'd be a slab. What would block then on | 00:12:24 | |
| top then or what? Or we're not fully through design of the foundation yet, but my. | 00:12:31 | |
| Impression of what it will look like is a slab, and then the building will actually be anchored to the slab as opposed to built up | 00:12:39 | |
| on block. | 00:12:43 | |
| Unless there's a requirement to raise that finished floor to a certain elevation. | 00:12:49 | |
| Well, that's what I was looking at. It's pretty low there. I was wondering about flooding in that Creek there. Yeah. So we'll take | 00:12:53 | |
| a look at that, but. | 00:12:57 | |
| Our first step was to get through this process before we we came through the rest of that. | 00:13:01 | |
| Yeah. The actual elevation that you see next to the plant is probably 4 to 5 foot difference in your 40 foot out and 46 foot. So | 00:13:06 | |
| we're, you know, almost 9090 foot. | 00:13:11 | |
| And that's at least 5 foot difference in elevation. | 00:13:17 | |
| From one end to the other, yes, yes. And it's in a flood. It's in a floodplain or floodway or something. It's right next to a | 00:13:21 | |
| Creek, so. | 00:13:24 | |
| We're concerned that what you're going to set that on. | 00:13:29 | |
| If you're saying a slab that would be it almost looked like a little treatment plant. | 00:13:35 | |
| Digesters or something, you know, maybe a huge slab of concrete that would be exposed. So we're just wondering how that what I | 00:13:42 | |
| mean that's that's going to really look. | 00:13:46 | |
| Out of place, right next to the entrance of the road. | 00:13:50 | |
| So we will take elevation under consideration at that design time and then when we get to building Commission, we can go through | 00:13:54 | |
| that with them at that point. | 00:13:58 | |
| Would you ever consider putting it inside the fence in front of your in front of your one block building that you have there that | 00:14:02 | |
| would already be in the fence. | 00:14:07 | |
| We were up there today, the gate was left open and the building was unlocked and unattended. So, you know, probably more more that | 00:14:12 | |
| we can get inside that secured area would probably better for, for the for the public. | 00:14:18 | |
| And you know, you may have to go to a smaller trailer. | 00:14:26 | |
| And then I will ask my next question to you first. | 00:14:29 | |
| May I approach? Sure absolutely please. | 00:14:34 | |
| So this is kind of our. | 00:14:37 | |
| Your your suggesting just slide it right if you can put it, if you can put it in right next to that, that building outside here, I | 00:14:41 | |
| think you got enough room you can pull your electric right off of that and it's going to save you a ton of money. | 00:14:51 | |
| See if they are, I'm not sure exactly the use of this building or what it's your motor control centers and your electrical and all | 00:15:00 | |
| that good stuff is what's in there. So I mean, you couldn't block the door, which each does say excess. | 00:15:06 | |
| But then what, what comes, what question that we had is what's changed with this operation? | 00:15:12 | |
| From now versus you know? | 00:15:19 | |
| Five years ago is is this building going to be used for a full time staff or temporary staff? I cannot totally speak to what Aqua | 00:15:22 | |
| is going to do full time or temporary. I do know that they have a desire to have more of a presence in this. This isn't the only | 00:15:28 | |
| treatment plant they have in this area. | 00:15:35 | |
| So this seems to be a logical point for them to place someone to be able to address all of their sewage facilities. | 00:15:43 | |
| I mean, normally these package plants, I call them can't afford a full time operator, correct. And so I think you know, I guess | 00:15:51 | |
| when in in the conception of the state everybody. | 00:15:58 | |
| I would say it would assume that it's going to be maintained by part time person and there was never going to be a full time staff | 00:16:05 | |
| staff at this location. | 00:16:10 | |
| And how many employees possibly would be at this location if you used it for a satellite office? | 00:16:15 | |
| I would adventure to say again, I can't speak exactly to how their long term use looks like right, but I would venture to say one, | 00:16:22 | |
| possibly two people they may run billing out of this for the area. So that would be a full time person that that I cannot speak in | 00:16:28 | |
| any detail other than conjecture. I personally would have a hard time voting anyway on this with not having these answers | 00:16:34 | |
| answered. | 00:16:40 | |
| So I mean in in good spirit for the the county and doing what's right. | 00:16:47 | |
| We really got to know what's going on with that building. | 00:16:53 | |
| And if there's any way it could be moved inside, that's that's not. | 00:16:56 | |
| And this is a newly constructed building. | 00:17:00 | |
| Newly prefabricated. I'm sorry, it's newly. You're not. It's not used structuring it will be new construction, that's correct. | 00:17:06 | |
| I mean the size, is that the smallest that that outfit builds or how was that determined that? I do not know, but I can find out | 00:17:12 | |
| that answer for you, OK. | 00:17:17 | |
| It goes along with yours. | 00:17:24 | |
| Here it goes on with your concerns. Yeah, yeah, I just, I need to know more answers, but all right, So anybody have any other | 00:17:25 | |
| questions for? | 00:17:29 | |
| Scott. | 00:17:34 | |
| Thank you, Scott. Appreciate it. So moving forward. | 00:17:45 | |
| Well, we're going to let the public. We have to open up to the public. They let the public speak and then you have an opportunity | 00:17:49 | |
| to come back up if you wish to ask for a table. And you do have to do that the next time you come up before they take it under | 00:17:53 | |
| consideration. | 00:17:57 | |
| All right. At this time, we'd like to call anybody that would like to come up and speak in favor of this project, in favor of the | 00:18:03 | |
| project. | 00:18:07 | |
| In favor? Yes Sir. | 00:18:12 | |
| You like it? | 00:18:14 | |
| OK, that being nobody now. Now we need anybody that would like to speak in opposition. Please come forward. | 00:18:16 | |
| All righty, come forward. | 00:18:24 | |
| And just state your name and address for the record Sir, please. | 00:18:28 | |
| My name is Clyde Harrelson, I live at 40. | 00:18:33 | |
| 4059 Tanglewood Dr. which is the street that structure is supposed to be put on at the beginning of our subdivision. | 00:18:36 | |
| Briefly, I want to stage it 20 years ago they. | 00:18:44 | |
| This company came before us with a meeting about increasing our race from 35 to 60 to $80.00 a month over A2 year period because | 00:18:47 | |
| they put in an extreme amount of growth. | 00:18:52 | |
| The price has never dropped even though they've added on customers after customer after customer. | 00:18:58 | |
| We were asked at that meeting why we aren't billed based on our water consumption like most other places that get billed for | 00:19:04 | |
| sewage. They said they were working on that and 20 years later they still haven't rolled that out. | 00:19:09 | |
| It was also after in that meeting how we contact them the number they had listed on their fence. | 00:19:17 | |
| Was another working number. | 00:19:22 | |
| They resolve that by taking the number down. If you if you were out there today you would have seen the sign announced who they | 00:19:24 | |
| are. No way to get a hold of them if there was a sewage overflow. I tried to look them up on Google, couldn't find them on Google. | 00:19:30 | |
| Indianapolis is the closest place Aqua is listed at. | 00:19:36 | |
| Over the years, higher mode out front area. | 00:19:43 | |
| Other neighbors would keep it mowed. | 00:19:46 | |
| There'd be times when they didn't get their mowing done. Sometimes we'd help them out and mow it, other times we wouldn't. But | 00:19:48 | |
| they're never, as a good neighbor, come over to try to help us keep our area mode. They would keep trash cans out in front. | 00:19:55 | |
| The entire week. | 00:20:02 | |
| Two years ago I stopped and asked them why they did that and they said there was number reason to bring him in. I said we we live | 00:20:04 | |
| in this subdivision and it looks. | 00:20:08 | |
| Very bad to drive into our subdivision every day and see 3 or 4 trash cans and these are these big waste cans. | 00:20:13 | |
| I didn't get anywhere until I mentioned there's no way you could be using 4 trash cans a week. | 00:20:21 | |
| With a wastewater plant, it turns out the employees that work there bring their trash and drop it in. Today I took a picture of | 00:20:25 | |
| the four trash cans. They're no longer in our drive. They only get halfway back to their fenced in area. They used to be kept in | 00:20:31 | |
| the fenced in area when the last year they don't even get that form. | 00:20:37 | |
| One trash can had three household garbage bags in another one had one. Another one had one. | 00:20:44 | |
| It's not fair for us to pay for their employees to use those bins as a garbage can as a as to save on their garbage. Again, that's | 00:20:49 | |
| not being a good neighbor. | 00:20:54 | |
| Nowhere on the plan is there mention of parking. | 00:21:00 | |
| The right hand side is almost useless for parking if they just park along the drive. I don't know how that would sit well with the | 00:21:04 | |
| fire department, but currently the people one or two trucks that show up during the week they park inside that fenced area. | 00:21:11 | |
| Our question, one of the questions we have as a subdivision was how many people are going to be working there and of course you've | 00:21:22 | |
| already brought that up. | 00:21:25 | |
| The structure itself is a shed. | 00:21:29 | |
| It's not a, it's not a, it's a prefab home. | 00:21:31 | |
| But basically when you drop that on a on a concrete slab, you're basically putting a shed down. | 00:21:35 | |
| They didn't check off on the requirements the list to include sewage. | 00:21:41 | |
| I would assume they would have to have a bathroom in there, but on that special documents both items that. | 00:21:46 | |
| That concern, septic tanks are not checked. | 00:21:52 | |
| It's on the second page of their own. | 00:21:56 | |
| They're avitated. | 00:21:59 | |
| So I was concerned why they would not check that off and provide it to the county to show what they're going to do for tapping | 00:22:00 | |
| sewage and. | 00:22:04 | |
| Run in water. | 00:22:08 | |
| The Creek does flood. It'll go into. | 00:22:11 | |
| It'll go on to Buck Creek and cover it on some of the turns. So that is that does happen quite frequently. So we know we're in a | 00:22:14 | |
| floodplain. | 00:22:18 | |
| I like to. I like that the question was asked. Why not put it inside the fence? | 00:22:23 | |
| It looks like they have enough parcel on the back of side, but it would be more expensive to clear that probably, but it would | 00:22:28 | |
| look a lot nicer than having a shed when you pull into our subdivision. | 00:22:33 | |
| Leaving it word if you allow them to do that and put it outside the fence. | 00:22:39 | |
| We don't need decorative trees there. We need it secured some kind of fence and you, you were there today and the place was | 00:22:44 | |
| unlocked that. | 00:22:48 | |
| That's just not, that's just uncalled for. I mean, they've got to be better citizens than that to help us as homeowners in that | 00:22:51 | |
| subdivision. | 00:22:55 | |
| I would suggest, I would hope that we don't vote today and put it off another another month until they get more of these answers | 00:23:03 | |
| back for us. | 00:23:07 | |
| But if you do vote, I hope you keep in mind that. | 00:23:10 | |
| I can't put a shed in front of my house. There's no way you would ever approve that. | 00:23:14 | |
| And that's basically what you're going to do today. If you say yes, you're going to prove a **** going in front of our | 00:23:19 | |
| subdivision. It's bad enough we have the cinder block plant, but that's a need for us. | 00:23:24 | |
| We don't need an office building. They could rent office space anywhere. | 00:23:29 | |
| Employ knobs, Galena. | 00:23:33 | |
| That's all. Thank you. Sir. Can you hold on for a second? I just want to ask you a question. | 00:23:37 | |
| In regards to the. | 00:23:42 | |
| The flooding, the entrance that you come into that subdivision where the box covered is, does it go across that road? | 00:23:45 | |
| All right. Anybody else? We still got 5 minutes and a half to. Anybody has any other that's in opposition? | 00:23:55 | |
| Just state your name and and your address for the record please. | 00:24:07 | |
| So having the sewer plant in your backyard is not a selling, it's not a good selling point for your home. And it does put out, you | 00:24:16 | |
| know, smells that sometimes of the year. So like we don't want to draw attention to that being in our neighborhood. So putting a | 00:24:23 | |
| building. | 00:24:30 | |
| Out there is gonna, I think, like. | 00:24:39 | |
| Raise the visible. | 00:24:41 | |
| Notion that you can see that there is a sewer plant right in front of where our our homes are. So that's why I don't also don't | 00:24:44 | |
| think it's a great idea. | 00:24:50 | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Terry. | 00:24:56 | |
| Now do we mention the letter? | 00:24:58 | |
| The health department letter, I'm not sure why that's not in the file. I think that be a question. Are they not using bathrooms? | 00:25:01 | |
| Why didn't why don't they have the necessary health department letter? | 00:25:06 | |
| Maybe Gabrielle can answer that. | 00:25:10 | |
| OK. | 00:25:18 | |
| OK. | 00:25:22 | |
| OK. And then next question is we have a letter from Corey Cochran. Do we need to? | 00:25:27 | |
| We will have a letter from Corey Cochran as well as Alan Platt that were submitted into the record. We should have a copy of | 00:25:32 | |
| those. I have a copy of those as well. | 00:25:38 | |
| Just he starts out by, well, I'm writing, I write in opposition to the placement of what has been described. So I'm not going to | 00:25:45 | |
| read the whole letter. Correct. And I believe the other one, Alan Platt is the same thing. They're in opposition to placement. OK, | 00:25:52 | |
| what was the name again? For the record? Alan Alan Platt. Platt. | 00:25:59 | |
| All right. Anybody else? We still have 4 minutes. | 00:26:08 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:26:14 | |
| OK. Scott, would you like come up and? | 00:26:15 | |
| Point of clarification. | 00:26:22 | |
| On your two letters in opposition to placement, is that opposition and placement altogether or in location as was your question? | 00:26:24 | |
| One of them was just saying that I know what the one that I read said. | 00:26:33 | |
| They wanted to be more appropriate. | 00:26:38 | |
| And aesthetically to a subdivision as opposed to a. | 00:26:40 | |
| Modular. | 00:26:45 | |
| They they were, so they they wanted to look more like it would fit into their subdivision. OK. It looked more like a house. Yeah. | 00:26:47 | |
| Instead of trailer, he's more against the pre manufactured building. Yes. | 00:26:52 | |
| If you like, we will read this. If you'd like for us to do that, are we? | 00:26:58 | |
| Do we have right to those letters? If we could just get copies, though, that would be sufficient. | 00:27:05 | |
| Gabrielle, are you OK with us giving cop these two copies and you can place a copy in the? | 00:27:13 | |
| You want to come look at them and just hand them? Turn for us, please. | 00:27:18 | |
| Make sure they're the ones that were given to us. | 00:27:22 | |
| Yeah, confirm that they're right. | 00:27:25 | |
| We can turn on that fan if you want to run that thing. | 00:27:33 | |
| This was something that the department. | 00:27:37 | |
| If they want, that's fine. Yeah, that'll that'll work just fine then. | 00:27:40 | |
| I have no other questions other than request a table so that I can answer the other questions. | 00:27:51 | |
| I appreciate that we need just so that I'm clear. | 00:27:57 | |
| This board. | 00:28:01 | |
| Would like answers to staffing levels on this yearly basis and hours per week, is that correct? Yes, also the ability to move that | 00:28:02 | |
| inside the existing fencing and then I. | 00:28:09 | |
| Can we reduce the footprint and maybe use a smaller building? Yes, is that does that cover the questions? Well, I think you need | 00:28:17 | |
| think you need to verify where the floor elevation would have to be as a result of that Creek. | 00:28:23 | |
| You know, are you going to have, is it going to be sitting 4 foot out of the ground, 6 foot out of the ground? | 00:28:29 | |
| I think you need to verify that. | 00:28:37 | |
| As part of this, I don't think we're necessarily looking at a smaller building, but this 115 1/2 feet by 46 feet. That's why I | 00:28:39 | |
| asked, is it a trailer? So that's that was a question on it. And I think that's their concern also, is it something like a | 00:28:46 | |
| trailer? Is it actually going to be an office building or at like that? So and that goes along with the one letter you got. I | 00:28:54 | |
| think you ought to consider something that's more aesthetically pleasing, more fitting with the neighborhood. Yes, yes. | 00:29:01 | |
| OK. And Don, when it comes in for their building permit that will dictate how many parking places and so forth. Our regs will | 00:29:09 | |
| dictate how many parking places they have to provide on it. | 00:29:14 | |
| Just basically a part would be a number of employed. | 00:29:21 | |
| Something will dictate. They'll be told they have to have so many parking places. | 00:29:24 | |
| That's right. And that's going to require you to enlarge that, obviously enlarge that area. So if it goes outside the gate, it's | 00:29:28 | |
| going to. | 00:29:31 | |
| Those are all. | 00:29:36 | |
| Building permission questions, is that correct? And then this is just special exception for land use, correct? OK, so tabled would | 00:29:39 | |
| go to. | 00:29:44 | |
| The January meeting, is that correct? Correct. That's correct. | 00:29:50 | |
| Then does correspondence need to be sent so many days prior to that hearing? You do not have to re notice and you can work with | 00:29:54 | |
| the staff to ask any other questions like that, but you don't have to re notice because you're making the announcement here at | 00:29:59 | |
| this mean that it will be tabled assuming the board votes to table at which. | 00:30:04 | |
| OK. | 00:30:09 | |
| So just work with the applicants questions. | 00:30:10 | |
| OK. Thank you for your time. | 00:30:14 | |
| I need a motion. I'll make a motion to table this till next month. | 00:30:17 | |
| Motion is second all in favor. Second by aye aye. Those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:30:22 | |
| OK, before we get started, Don. | 00:30:27 | |
| Adams I make sure I'm right this time. Item 3 through 7. | 00:30:32 | |
| Christy and I have talked and her advice, I'm going to recluse myself from those items and leave the room and. | 00:30:38 | |
| You'll have to take over for me, big guy. OK. All right. Thank you. | 00:30:47 | |
| OK. Next item of business is agenda item number three and through 7 which is FC-1124-4811. | 00:30:53 | |
| Let's just do the one, OK? It's gonna see if we could do them all together, is what I was gonna ask. | 00:31:06 | |
| You through about yourself and then you have to do 3 and then you can do the development. Depending on how that turns out we can | 00:31:13 | |
| decide to get to do with the other ones. OK. The agenda item FC-311-2448 Special exception applicant is requesting a special | 00:31:21 | |
| exception to allow many storage in residential suburban zoned area and in the Edwardsville overlay district. | 00:31:29 | |
| The Elder Company LLC, 1320 W Knavel Rd. Georgetown, IN. | 00:31:37 | |
| Section 36, Township 2, Range 5 E. Would you please, Mr. Lough, give us a staff report? | 00:31:44 | |
| This is docket item FC11-24-48 Petitioners Elder Company, LLC location 1320 W Knavel Rd. Georgetown, IN 47122 tax number tax IDs | 00:31:54 | |
| or 220203600086.00. | 00:32:03 | |
| Dash .002 and 220203600082. That point 00-002. The request is a special exception for many storage. The district is residential | 00:32:14 | |
| suburban. It is also in the Edwardsville Gateway Overlay district. | 00:32:23 | |
| The applicant is requesting a special exception to allow many warehouse self storage use on a residential suburban zone property. | 00:32:33 | |
| The property is also located in the Edwardsville Overlay District. | 00:32:39 | |
| Mini Storage is not an allowed use in a residential suburban zone in the FC Floyd County Zoning Ordinance Appendix Land Use Matrix | 00:32:45 | |
| and is expressly prohibited in the Gate Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:32:52 | |
| Yes, Floyd County Ordinance 8.06 Dash 1 Warehousing and Storage are permitted uses in office, business and general industrial | 00:33:00 | |
| districts in the zoning ordinance. | 00:33:05 | |
| The proposal includes 13 storage units. | 00:33:12 | |
| A 400 square foot maintenance unit and a 400 square foot office with a service. | 00:33:15 | |
| Kiosks. The total square footage of the storage units will be 91,800 square feet. A lot coverage is approximately 69% of the 6.7 | 00:33:21 | |
| acre Watt 8. Parking spaces are located in front of the office with a detention base and located in front of the lot. The | 00:33:28 | |
| applicant is also requesting development standard variances for building materials, number of primary structures, lot coverage and | 00:33:34 | |
| building facade transparency. | 00:33:41 | |
| The adjacent property to the east and southeast of properties Interstate 64 made it lead to the South is it now Edwardsville | 00:33:49 | |
| Animal Clinic and a non conforming use on residential suburban zoned property operating prior to the 2006 zoning ordinance to the | 00:33:55 | |
| immediate SW across W enables a single family dwelling in the general commercial zone. Clayton Homes is located behind that | 00:34:01 | |
| property to the West. | 00:34:08 | |
| As a single family. | 00:34:15 | |
| So OK, behind that property to the West is a single family line and farm and off to the family zone property in the northwest is a | 00:34:18 | |
| residential suburban single family dwelling split from this property in 2022, and to the north is a large 20 acre residential | 00:34:24 | |
| suburban lot with a single family dwelling. | 00:34:30 | |
| Staff findings The special exception will be injurious to public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The | 00:34:37 | |
| property is currently served by a three inch water line with the nearest larger line at least 1500 feet away. Georgetown Fire | 00:34:44 | |
| Department provides the minimum provided the minimum line required to serve a development of this nature via 6. | 00:34:51 | |
| 6 inch line with a hydrant within 400 feet of any building, but recommended at least an 8 inch line. | 00:35:00 | |
| The use and value of the adjacent properties subject to the special section. | 00:35:07 | |
| Will he's got will not be affected except first are substantially adverse manner. The proposed use is relatively low impact with | 00:35:13 | |
| low traffic generation, will not generate nuisance noise or smells and will be required to meet storm water standards. Storage is | 00:35:20 | |
| a reasonable use with the proximity multi zone family property and will be located to existing general commercial property. | 00:35:28 | |
| The need for the special exception does not arise. | 00:35:36 | |
| Conditions particular to the property involved. | 00:35:40 | |
| Property was recently split from a homestead to the northwest and has since remained vacant. Properties suitable for residential | 00:35:43 | |
| development consistent with its Sony with current infrastructure, allows up to four homes to be located there. | 00:35:49 | |
| The strict application of the Floyd County zoning ordinance. | 00:35:56 | |
| They're both underlined. | 00:36:09 | |
| From his staff report, they're both undermined. | 00:36:12 | |
| So I think he's saying it will not. He says the property is currently suitable for single family developments and enjoined single | 00:36:19 | |
| family developments so following the zoning ordinance would not result in unnecessary hardship. | 00:36:25 | |
| The property is suitable for single family developments and adjacent, so I apologize. | 00:36:33 | |
| Nick left at 4:00. | 00:36:40 | |
| In short order, the approval of the special exception will contradict the GOES and objectives of the Floyd County Comprehensive | 00:36:44 | |
| Plan. The proposed use is an expressly prohibited in the zoning ordinance for the Edwardsville Gateway Overlay District. The use | 00:36:50 | |
| does not fit into the planning documents for the area and is inconsistent with the district intent. The use is a low intensity, | 00:36:56 | |
| low traffic use. This is a gateway district and adjacent Town Center concept and identified economic growth areas. The use would | 00:37:01 | |
| not create significant active. | 00:37:07 | |
| Activity desired in the growth area. Aesthetically, the use would not be consistent with existing planning guidelines. The use | 00:37:14 | |
| presents characteristics more consistent with industrial warehousing than aesthetically. Rural, neighborhood oriented commercial | 00:37:20 | |
| with multiple large structures, low novel traffic volume, security fencing, limited landscaping, metal facades, and the doors. The | 00:37:26 | |
| property also lacks necessary infrastructure for Fire Protection and water service. Staff Recommendations Denial due to not | 00:37:32 | |
| meeting the. | 00:37:38 | |
| Applications, particularly with the use being inconsistent with the Gateway Plan and Floyd County Comprehensive Plan and the lack | 00:37:44 | |
| of infrastructure. | 00:37:48 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. Does the Board have any questions for Mr. Law? | 00:37:53 | |
| Mr. Bieber, has you got any questions? No, thank you. OK. | 00:38:05 | |
| Would the applicant please come forward and state what you're going to do? | 00:38:09 | |
| And keep in mind that we have a quorum. There's only three of us here. It takes three votes and we normally have 5 S If you want | 00:38:13 | |
| to table it, please let us know. | 00:38:20 | |
| I do not thank you so much for the time and for being here. My name is Jake Elder with the Elder company, 501 E Pearl St. New | 00:38:27 | |
| Albany, IN. Also with me is Scott Hannah Heritage engineering and also Justin Hindrance with young women craft. | 00:38:34 | |
| Before we get started acting, Mr. President, I would request that the 10 minute time period be extended and that the procedures be | 00:38:43 | |
| lifted. This is a very complex issue and we want to make sure to preserve the record. | 00:38:49 | |
| Board, what do you think? That's up to you all as a board to make that decision whether or not you want to extend the time. You | 00:38:56 | |
| could also let it go for the time period and see where they are, I mean. | 00:39:00 | |
| What do you want to do? Board up to your discretion, say let him get started and see. OK, we'll see how we do. | 00:39:06 | |
| OK. Thank you so much. | 00:39:11 | |
| You all are essentially a quasi judicial board, an unbiased board and it's. | 00:39:14 | |
| Petitioners obligation to meet the burden as to whether or not the use of variance request should be granted or should be denied. | 00:39:18 | |
| These standards are protected with the state and federal government. | 00:39:26 | |
| Process, due process, civil rights, and so forth. | 00:39:30 | |
| There's been a recent case in Tipton County Board zoning appeals. We hope for hurting 230 N Sea 3rd 3/22 to 20/20/28 court appeals | 00:39:34 | |
| case and it talks about the type of evidence in what way you should give to it. | 00:39:41 | |
| And it talks about the evidence, at minimum, must be substantial. | 00:39:49 | |
| Evidence. It must be more than speculation or conjecture. | 00:39:53 | |
| Gaining Damian pulled the pills actually reversed the easiest decision because the BCA board listened more to. | 00:39:56 | |
| Speculation, opinion of neighbors and demonstrators versus the evidence that was presented. | 00:40:03 | |
| Do you all have a copy of the petition itself in front of you where we can kind of go through the site plan and withdraw? | 00:40:08 | |
| I don't have the whole thing, but I got. | 00:40:17 | |
| Bits and pieces of it, but I got that drawing. That's what you're asking. They all have a copy of it accessible they've reviewed. | 00:40:19 | |
| I'm happy to present as we go give any questions, OK. | 00:40:26 | |
| So if we look at the. | 00:40:32 | |
| The site plan itself. | 00:40:33 | |
| It's 1320 W Canable Rd. We know where it's located. | 00:40:36 | |
| It doesn't have water capacity out front? Or does it have sewer? | 00:40:40 | |
| Availability in. | 00:40:46 | |
| And so originally, we're looking at this for potential multifamily use after going through the due diligence process we landed on. | 00:40:48 | |
| Many storage units. | 00:40:54 | |
| We were trying to take into account the neighbors to the North and South. You'll see where we positioned the facility back off the | 00:40:56 | |
| road a substantial way versus having it all the way up towards the front of the road for view shed so that the animal. | 00:41:03 | |
| Hospital as well as the neighbor to the north and they're looking at their front door, they would not see that the mini storage | 00:41:11 | |
| units. | 00:41:14 | |
| We've also. This is more of an exaggeration of the maximum amount. | 00:41:20 | |
| 97,000 square feet we don't intend. | 00:41:24 | |
| When building 97,000 square feet, but we did want to show what would fit. | 00:41:27 | |
| On the site plan. | 00:41:32 | |
| You can look for the. | 00:41:33 | |
| Buildings facing West Canaveral Rd. both of those would be in essence privacy fences at least one behind built out of CMU block. | 00:41:36 | |
| We've popped in some vegetation just social landscaping again that would come to the next level during development plan on how | 00:41:42 | |
| much landscaping was required underneath the Floyd County development standards. Also looking just S there's a whole there's an | 00:41:49 | |
| additional line of landscaping but again before the board today it's simply use variance request. | 00:41:56 | |
| The very first element is the special exception will be interest to the public health, safety, morals, general welfare of the | 00:42:05 | |
| community as Mr. Lot property is currently served by three inch water line in the nearest larger line at least 1500 feet away. It | 00:42:10 | |
| states that the Georgetown Fire Department provides the minimum line required to serve the development of this nature to be a six | 00:42:16 | |
| inch line with a hydrant and within 400 feet. | 00:42:22 | |
| A way of the building. | 00:42:29 | |
| If I may approach my hand you all document. | 00:42:33 | |
| Thank you. | 00:42:41 | |
| So if you look at this, this is an aerial map. I was able to get on the. | 00:42:49 | |
| The phone was everything Water Corporation this morning. | 00:42:53 | |
| It's going to be a little bit hard to see and I did the best thing I could, but on the between McDonald's and Red Roof Inn I put a | 00:42:56 | |
| black dot that is the closest 6 inch water line. | 00:43:02 | |
| And then if you look on the West Canable Rd. there is another fire hydrant someone provided by. | 00:43:08 | |
| Reach Waterlogging. | 00:43:13 | |
| So if we're looking at what Mr. Creedy stated, as well as what's positioned by the Georgetown Fire Department. | 00:43:15 | |
| The Derays Barber Shop, The Shell, The Circle K, The Cash Saver, Indiana Land, Clayton Homes in Edwardsville Animal Clinic. | 00:43:21 | |
| None of which are within 400 feet of a six inch line. | 00:43:30 | |
| So we disagree that that is a standard that has to be met. If it is, then all these businesses are in violation of, say, Fire | 00:43:34 | |
| Safety 2014. | 00:43:38 | |
| Also, I've reached out to Sheriff Bush as well as Assistant Chief Scott Lamore. The General Police Department provided those two | 00:43:46 | |
| letters. Letters. | 00:43:50 | |
| It's in your packet. | 00:43:54 | |
| Just questioning whether or not there's any inherent. | 00:43:55 | |
| Crime or public safety issues related to many storage both gentlemen, many, many years, decades experience between the two of | 00:43:59 | |
| them. Both indicate in their letters that many storage units are no different than any other business, and they're not any. | 00:44:06 | |
| More highly successful to crime than, say, a shopping center. | 00:44:14 | |
| Or anything else in the area? | 00:44:17 | |
| So we believe that the special exception, you know, would not be interest to public health safety. | 00:44:21 | |
| And general work of the community. | 00:44:26 | |
| The second prong, the use and value of the area to the property, will not be adversely affected and substantially adverse. | 00:44:29 | |
| Man approach once more. | 00:44:35 | |
| Thank you. | 00:44:52 | |
| So if we can look where the star is, that's that's a subject property. | 00:44:59 | |
| So just beneath the subject property, that's the Edwardsville Animal Clinic, which we know is not a residential use, even though | 00:45:03 | |
| it's zoned as such. Across the street we have Clayton Homes and a candy Corner, and directly across the street we have a | 00:45:07 | |
| multifamily property. | 00:45:11 | |
| After looking at the acreage of the multifamily property and. | 00:45:16 | |
| And looking at consistent development standards in the area at some point A. | 00:45:20 | |
| If it continues to stay be zoned as a multi family, there should be anywhere between 120 and 150 units at some point to be built. | 00:45:25 | |
| So it's important that we understand that this request is not just surrounded by residential, it is between the Interstate and | 00:45:32 | |
| next to three of the four different properties are not. | 00:45:37 | |
| Residential letter surrounding. | 00:45:43 | |
| In order to understand whether or not the use and the value would be disrupted at all. | 00:45:46 | |
| We reached out to Mark Hack and Troy Stiller, both with decades of experience both. | 00:45:53 | |
| Respected. | 00:45:59 | |
| Real estate brokers in the area. | 00:46:01 | |
| I mean, the Greentree Realty I think has 54 agents between the two of them, probably, you know. | 00:46:04 | |
| 10s of millions of dollars a year in transactions. Both have done an aerial review and and have found that they would not | 00:46:09 | |
| adversely affect any of the properties values and surrounding properties. If you look at their letters, they specifically looked | 00:46:14 | |
| at. | 00:46:20 | |
| Store space Self Storage. They're located on State Hwy. 64 and how related to Meadow Oaks and Spring Crest subdivisions. | 00:46:26 | |
| Mr. | 00:46:34 | |
| Hack looked at. | 00:46:36 | |
| Also looked at storage space self storage Also looked at storage stowaway storage. They only Pike and storage rental of America | 00:46:38 | |
| there in New Albany. | 00:46:42 | |
| Indiana. | 00:46:47 | |
| The third prong the need for a special exception, which is. | 00:46:51 | |
| Really, a variance use arises from some condition peculiar to a property. | 00:46:55 | |
| Mr. Creeby states that the property was recently split from the homestead to the north northwest and has remained vacant. The | 00:47:00 | |
| property suitable for residential development consistent with its zoning and current infrastructure, which allows up to four | 00:47:05 | |
| homes. | 00:47:10 | |
| Well, the county I feel right here is they're trying to bootstrap the property owner only building 4 homes on on that area. It's | 00:47:15 | |
| approximately 7 acres. | 00:47:19 | |
| Property owner does have a right to seek a reasonable return on his property, and his or her property is governed by Indiana law. | 00:47:24 | |
| Subject property has many peculiar conditions. | 00:47:28 | |
| It's located next to an Interstate. | 00:47:34 | |
| Which has approximately 53,000 cars a day that go go by create substantial noise and fumes. That's surrounded by other uses other | 00:47:36 | |
| than residential IE multifamily, commercial and animal clinic. There are significant topography issues. | 00:47:42 | |
| Will increase the development costs and there's a lack of water supply as well as those sewers at the lot line. | 00:47:49 | |
| In 465 LLC versus Metropolitan Board of Zoning appeals. | 00:47:57 | |
| The BCA determined that property that is adjacent to Interstate and serves as a buffer between residential neighborhoods and | 00:48:03 | |
| commercial Interstate activity is a peculiarity of property. | 00:48:07 | |
| Also in Bowman, the metro border zoning appeals of Marion. | 00:48:13 | |
| That being 331 NE 2nd 735, stating that the size of acreage, whether it's small or large, can also be a peculiarity. | 00:48:17 | |
| In Metro School District of Washington Township, the. | 00:48:27 | |
| Jansen. | 00:48:30 | |
| That being a 302 NE 2nd 551, the Board was justified in finding a need of the variance arose from a condition procurement | 00:48:31 | |
| property. There was evidence that the unusual shape and relatively small acreage, when viewed in conjunction with adjoining | 00:48:37 | |
| commercial use and railroad tracks made the property in suitable for development as either the apartment complexes or agriculture. | 00:48:43 | |
| Metro Development versus Troy Realty. | 00:48:50 | |
| Affirming the issuance of a variance where evidence indicated the property was situated at a corner of a heavily trafficked | 00:48:53 | |
| intersection, making it more affected by noise and fumes and surrounding area, and was adversely affected by water. | 00:48:59 | |
| And lastly. | 00:49:06 | |
| There's another case here versus Shackleford, affirming a variance where the parcel was located in major major thoroughfare and | 00:49:08 | |
| adjacent to gas station, making the site unsuitable for single family. | 00:49:13 | |
| Issues. | 00:49:20 | |
| #4 the strict application of the terms and zoning ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. Sorry if we can pause it right | 00:49:24 | |
| there. So the 10 minutes is up. | 00:49:27 | |
| I don't know if you guys want to extend that 5 minutes or whatever, you know, time period or where you want to move forward. | 00:49:32 | |
| A piece on the item 4. I said keep going. Yeah, keep going. | 00:49:40 | |
| Keith Ellen, Thank you, Sir. | 00:49:45 | |
| Mr. Creeby states that the strict application of the terms of zoning warrants will not result in necessary hardship of use. | 00:49:48 | |
| And we disagree with that, as it is a blanket statement that does not even address the right of the property owner to seek a | 00:49:54 | |
| reasonable return. | 00:49:57 | |
| In the case, Board of Zoning Appeals of City of Whiten Lake County versus McFadden, it does state that the determination of the | 00:50:01 | |
| existence of an unnecessary hardship is governed by all relevant factors which, taken together, indicate that property cannot | 00:50:07 | |
| reasonably be put to conforming use because limitations imposed upon it by the ordinance. It must also be shown that the land | 00:50:13 | |
| involved cannot return and yield a reasonable return that's only used for the allowed zoning purposes. | 00:50:20 | |
| Well as of right now stating that it should remain as. | 00:50:27 | |
| Residential and that four. | 00:50:32 | |
| Homes would be enough. | 00:50:34 | |
| And we have a letter from Mr. John Locke. | 00:50:36 | |
| Who has close to a billion dollars in transactions from residential and commercial stating that that would not be a reasonable | 00:50:39 | |
| return, only allowing for four. | 00:50:43 | |
| Residential lots. | 00:50:48 | |
| The determination of the existence as the properties that sits today without having to come before the BCA only has to buy right | 00:50:50 | |
| permitted uses, agriculture, agricultural or Home Farm stands, child cares within the home, a dwelling of a manufactured home, | 00:50:57 | |
| dwelling of single family, detached residential facility and or trails or walking paths. | 00:51:04 | |
| So the relevant facts are peculiar conditions not created specific to this or limited to these. These were not created by the | 00:51:12 | |
| property owner. | 00:51:16 | |
| Saying that they don't abuse residential homes sits next to I64. | 00:51:21 | |
| The surrounding uses are. | 00:51:26 | |
| Other than just residential? | 00:51:28 | |
| There's a substantial amount of follow the property. | 00:51:31 | |
| The property does not have available sewers anywhere close. It's 1500 feet away. We actually sent out for a bid through temple and | 00:51:33 | |
| temple which is in your packet. How much would it cost to bring sewer and water to here to do anything with it? And the, the, the, | 00:51:40 | |
| the cost was between 225,275 thousand. So by the time that you take the cost of bringing infrastructure, the cost of the land each | 00:51:48 | |
| lot itself will probably be 100 to $125,000 per lot. You can use it for four lots. | 00:51:55 | |
| And lastly, we don't believe that the mini storage would really alter. | 00:52:07 | |
| The character of the surrounding area. | 00:52:12 | |
| When you look at how far it's set back, most of the visibilities can be off of the Interstate. | 00:52:14 | |
| And we're going to block majority of it. | 00:52:18 | |
| With. | 00:52:20 | |
| What what I would call walls with the backside made out of masonry brick. | 00:52:22 | |
| It was like a secure privacy fence facing West Canaveral Rd. | 00:52:27 | |
| With an abundance of landscaping, working with the Floyd County. | 00:52:31 | |
| Develop. | 00:52:36 | |
| Now item 5 gets a little bit. | 00:52:39 | |
| Tricky here, and the reason I say that is because use variances are controlled by Indiana code 3674 dash 918.4. | 00:52:43 | |
| And that statute states that the approval does not interfere substantially with the comp plan adopted under the 500 series of this | 00:52:52 | |
| chapter. | 00:52:56 | |
| That's in contradiction to what has been adopted and what's in your petition. Your petition states that the approval of the | 00:53:01 | |
| special exception will contradict the goes or will not contradict the goals of the four county Planning Commission. | 00:53:07 | |
| I know that may not sound like a big deal, but there is a big difference on whether there's something contradicts something or | 00:53:14 | |
| whether or not it interferes substantially. | 00:53:18 | |
| Furthermore, if you move forward underneath and again, you have your own legal counsel. | 00:53:23 | |
| As you move forward underneath element #5 and not the correct statute for you in violation of the doctor involved. Alter berries. | 00:53:28 | |
| I have seven additional pages of how I believe that we are in compliance with a comp plan. | 00:53:37 | |
| They were in our package. | 00:53:44 | |
| Has everybody had an opportunity to? | 00:53:46 | |
| To review, I mean, I'm happy to present and go through. | 00:53:50 | |
| And then the other thing that I did at least want to quickly go over. | 00:53:53 | |
| Is Mr. Creevy? | 00:53:57 | |
| Handed you all. | 00:54:00 | |
| Kind of a print out with this response. | 00:54:04 | |
| And his highlights are in yellow. | 00:54:06 | |
| And So what I did. | 00:54:13 | |
| As I went through. | 00:54:14 | |
| And these are copies of account plan. | 00:54:16 | |
| And what I did is I went through. | 00:54:18 | |
| And I marked in blue everything that we've cited. | 00:54:20 | |
| So we just simply disagree, I guess with the complaint says. | 00:54:23 | |
| So on page 5, everything in blue the development. | 00:54:28 | |
| Redevelopment or change in the use of land with employee county should we consider on the basis basis of its immediate and future | 00:54:31 | |
| impact on the public health, safety, welfare, population density? | 00:54:36 | |
| And whether proposed available furthers the interests of the company, we find that it does. | 00:54:42 | |
| The next one talks about the. | 00:54:47 | |
| Prehensive plan policy shall strive to protect rural character of Floyd County is maintained and preserved through the development | 00:54:49 | |
| of conservation, development design, sustainable ecological design and very important here the promotion of low impact | 00:54:54 | |
| infrastructure choices. | 00:54:58 | |
| Also included in your pack, we retained a traffic engineer. | 00:55:03 | |
| She's presented a letter in your pocket. | 00:55:07 | |
| Mini storage cemeteries and churches are the single lowest impact infrastructures uses that the municipality can have. We feel | 00:55:11 | |
| that we need that and it follows the. | 00:55:16 | |
| Account plan here in Floyd County. | 00:55:22 | |
| Also, on page 5 when you look, it talks about the request for special uses should be measured against the adopted land use | 00:55:24 | |
| policies and objectives in this document. | 00:55:28 | |
| Factors for consideration include the relation of development, redevelopment or change in land use to the following factors. So | 00:55:33 | |
| what I've done if you look on page 5. | 00:55:37 | |
| The 12 small bullet points. | 00:55:42 | |
| We can go through each one and as to why this meets it so a nuisance potential to existing or planned future land uses. Many | 00:55:46 | |
| storage will not create any nuisances In the end of the code defines nuisances as whatever is interest to health and decent | 00:55:52 | |
| offensive to the census and obstruction to the free use of the property. So it's essentially to interfere with the comfortable | 00:55:58 | |
| enjoying the life of property as a nuisance. We don't believe that a mini storage unit is a nuisance. | 00:56:05 | |
| Proximity to existing light use developed. | 00:56:12 | |
| Mr. Creeby already acknowledges in his statements that. | 00:56:16 | |
| Mini storage is a like use development to that of multifamily. Multifamily can be found directly across the street. | 00:56:20 | |
| 3rd population density. | 00:56:28 | |
| We had a private third party neutral perform a market analysis on this site and found there's a need. | 00:56:30 | |
| In the area when comparing the local density as well as increased residential development. | 00:56:35 | |
| There has been an increase in density. There's definitely been an increase in apartments. You have about 400 new apartments coming | 00:56:40 | |
| online as well as new. | 00:56:43 | |
| Residential neighborhoods and this is going to fill a void in a need. | 00:56:48 | |
| You look to the next. | 00:56:52 | |
| Bullet proximity to supporting land uses. The property has Interstate visibility less than a mile off the exit and is adjacent to | 00:56:54 | |
| grocery stores, gas stations, fast food restaurants and animal clinic. A mobile manufactured home sales company is directly across | 00:56:59 | |
| the street from a large vacant tract zone multifamily. | 00:57:04 | |
| The traffic patterns and thoroughfare plan. | 00:57:10 | |
| Many storage is the lowest impact use possible and is substantially less than that of single family home residential development, | 00:57:12 | |
| so traffic patterns will not be affected by this development. | 00:57:17 | |
| Public safety systems, including Fire Protection and law enforcement. | 00:57:23 | |
| Per the letters from Floyd County Sheriff Bush and Assistant Chief JPD Scott McGuire, there are no public safety concerns related | 00:57:26 | |
| to this. | 00:57:29 | |
| Project. Furthermore, non conditioned mini storage units are not required to be sprinkled. It will be beneath the 12,000 square | 00:57:33 | |
| foot threshold that would mandate it. | 00:57:38 | |
| Water and sanitation systems. Many storage units do not require water or sanitation systems. Therefore it will not adversely | 00:57:44 | |
| affect the system. | 00:57:47 | |
| Public school system many stories will not create any new students for the area. That's why I have no impact. | 00:57:52 | |
| Topographic and geological Characteristics The topo and geologic characteristic of the site will have to be studied. Depending on | 00:57:57 | |
| what's beneath, the surface and sign may have to be reduced significantly. | 00:58:02 | |
| The preservation of natural characteristics, including sight lines. | 00:58:08 | |
| In an effort to adhere to the Evertsville gateway intent and this provisions of the comp plan who intentionally set back the mini | 00:58:11 | |
| storage units approximately this was originally 250 feet, but I think we moved it up to maybe like 180 which by code I think the | 00:58:17 | |
| setbacks are maybe 40 feet. So we're. | 00:58:23 | |
| 4/4 times back the minimum threshold. | 00:58:30 | |
| Site drainage. | 00:58:34 | |
| All site drains will meet Floyd County standards. Loss of agricultural use. The property is not currently being utilized for any | 00:58:35 | |
| farming purposes, so no loss will occur. | 00:58:40 | |
| And then it states that if there's any other factor reasonably related to protect health, safety and general welfare of the public | 00:58:44 | |
| or further interest of the comp plan. | 00:58:48 | |
| So these are the. | 00:58:53 | |
| Probably the top 12. | 00:58:55 | |
| Things you need to look at as to whether or not the grand experience and in our opinion we we meet. | 00:58:58 | |
| We are in compliance. | 00:59:04 | |
| And we certainly, if you're looking at state statute, we certainly do not substantially interfere with a comp plan that has been | 00:59:05 | |
| adopted. | 00:59:09 | |
| Also on page 5 I want to talk about the intensity and type of the development. | 00:59:15 | |
| Shall be limited by the ability of the infrastructure proposed and existing to service the new development without materially | 00:59:19 | |
| decreasing the level of service to the existing development or creating safety concerns. The use variance is low intensity and | 00:59:23 | |
| does not require any additional service other than what currently exists and will not materially harm the environment or create | 00:59:28 | |
| safety concern. | 00:59:32 | |
| Engineers report mini storage will not impact the roads in any way since it's such a low trip generator. | 01:00:07 | |
| Also on page 6, development, redevelopment or change in use of land with Floyd County shall preserve the natural characteristics | 01:00:13 | |
| and scenic quality of the land to the greatest extent possible. Instead of attempting to maximize the acreage, we have designed a | 01:00:20 | |
| way to preserve the natural characteristics by agreeing to use masonry products that face the sides that of West Can Eagle just | 01:00:26 | |
| like similar other mini storages in Flint County. | 01:00:32 | |
| Page 23 of the comp plan The second highest preference for the community moving forward was locally owned restaurants, retail and | 01:00:40 | |
| businesses. | 01:00:44 | |
| My family and I live 5 minutes away from this property. We will own it and operate these many storage units. As a locally owned | 01:00:49 | |
| business, this clearly meets the second highest preference in the comp plan. | 01:00:53 | |
| On page 23, although the survey was extremely beneficial. | 01:00:59 | |
| The main challenge will be finding funding solutions that are realistic but also satisfy the residents. | 01:01:03 | |
| Of the community. | 01:01:09 | |
| Also on page 24. | 01:01:11 | |
| In May of 2015, Professor Larry Dior of Purdue University spoke regarding local government finances. | 01:01:13 | |
| In his discussion, he addressed the attributes of land use employee counting key points from the discussion where the fact that | 01:01:20 | |
| Floyd County has one of the lowest property taxes in the state of Indiana and it has smaller than state average of taxing entities | 01:01:27 | |
| and this is important. It has smaller than average amount of commercial and industrial lands available. | 01:01:34 | |
| So. | 01:01:42 | |
| The comp plan kind of identifies also a number for the planners for Planning Commission. The board zoning appeals to | 01:01:43 | |
| commissioners. | 01:01:46 | |
| Because it talks about all these new amenities, but they don't raise taxes or anything important. | 01:01:50 | |
| Well, an idea is that the Highlander Point and Edwardsville Gateway trip which is adjacent to this property. | 01:01:56 | |
| Brings in about $119,000 a year. | 01:02:02 | |
| About 400 properties that exist. | 01:02:05 | |
| That that was the revenue spent last year. | 01:02:07 | |
| It's in the package. | 01:02:10 | |
| This development right here is going to be somewhere in the neighborhood between 4:00 and $5,000,000 if you extend. If you extend | 01:02:11 | |
| the TIF, you can capture probably $40,000 a year. | 01:02:16 | |
| With $140,000 a year you can create grants for local businesses, you can upgrade facades, you can do a lot of things if the other | 01:02:21 | |
| community communities are different. | 01:02:24 | |
| Are you about getting about done? | 01:02:30 | |
| For the next steps. | 01:02:34 | |
| Of the of the 10 guiding principles on page 27, the three paramount principles for Floyd County to meet the state of community | 01:02:36 | |
| values over 3. | 01:02:40 | |
| Preserve open spaces and farmland, strengthen and direct development toward existing communities, and foster distinctive, | 01:02:45 | |
| attractive communities with strong places. | 01:02:48 | |
| Sense. Sense of place. | 01:02:54 | |
| We could have actually maximized this even more. And when we chose not to, to try to keep some level of green space out in front | 01:02:55 | |
| of the detention basin, extended our buffer yards on either side. So we feel like we, we, we need those. | 01:03:02 | |
| I'm not going to belabor the point. I think you will kind of get the ideas I've been. | 01:03:09 | |
| Been up here kind of reading and reciting but I want to make sure to make a record. | 01:03:16 | |
| Clear record At this time I'd like to put into the record exhibits one through. | 01:03:19 | |
| Well, a lot of it's been presented the case law to be other documents that I've presented to. | 01:03:26 | |
| And I don't know if. | 01:03:36 | |
| You have any questions for the engineer or for just an industry, correct? | 01:03:38 | |
| OK. Does the board have any questions? | 01:03:42 | |
| I've got a couple. | 01:03:47 | |
| First, do you already own the land or is this contingent on purchase? This is contingent on if it's approved. We'll we'll close | 01:03:49 | |
| and we. | 01:03:54 | |
| And you mentioned that. | 01:03:59 | |
| The site work would be extensive and the cost would be extensive. If this was developed as residential, how is that any different | 01:04:02 | |
| than? | 01:04:06 | |
| Basically scraping everything off and adding a bunch of parks, gate infrastructure. I don't understand how I'm saying this would | 01:04:11 | |
| be expensive. | 01:04:15 | |
| This doing the site work here because if you look at how the length of the the pads themselves. | 01:04:20 | |
| There's going to be additional site work that need to be had. | 01:04:27 | |
| For a mini storage versus 4 homes. | 01:04:30 | |
| OK. | 01:04:34 | |
| I thought you were making the the argument that this is. | 01:04:36 | |
| Better than the home, so I misunderstood. | 01:04:39 | |
| That's it. That's all I can. | 01:04:47 | |
| One, sorry, one other question, yes Sir. Is there any consideration to why are you going variance versus zoning change because | 01:04:49 | |
| it's a prohibited use. So even if we went into a rezone that wouldn't allow this within the base of zoning, it is in the | 01:04:55 | |
| Edwardsville overlay and in that within your zoning ordinances prohibited using. So you would have to seek A use variance. We | 01:05:01 | |
| actually discussed this Nick and I regardless, even if it was rezoned, it would be back before you all anyways. And so either way | 01:05:06 | |
| it was going to be before this board. | 01:05:12 | |
| OK, thanks. | 01:05:19 | |
| One question that I have is the orientation of the building. With all the slope that's on that property. It seems like the | 01:05:23 | |
| building drop should be rotated 90° in my opinion. | 01:05:28 | |
| I don't disagree with you, but what we were, I don't know how you're gonna have to have retaining walls or something to hold this, | 01:05:34 | |
| to build all those buildings. So what we were trying to do, Sir, is limit. | 01:05:39 | |
| Anything that the rest of the. | 01:05:44 | |
| Surrounding property on the western naval side would see and maybe at the end of the day we come back and rotate them. The most | 01:05:46 | |
| important thing that I, if I were a neighbor is I would want you know. | 01:05:51 | |
| The long lines of which would be essentially a fence of brick. | 01:05:57 | |
| And then what you do on the insides of? | 01:06:01 | |
| I think would be OK depending upon how the site. | 01:06:04 | |
| OK. That was my concern because there's pretty good steep hill there. And how you? | 01:06:07 | |
| I couldn't figure out how you're going to do those unless you've done a lot of dirt, dirt work. There would be a substantial | 01:06:15 | |
| amount of dirt work. And then the other piece to this, remember when I first introduced a cyclone? | 01:06:19 | |
| We don't intend. | 01:06:24 | |
| To maximize and build 90,000 square feet. | 01:06:26 | |
| I mean, our first phase will probably be around 30 to 36,000. | 01:06:29 | |
| And then if it builds out, then we'll maybe move on. | 01:06:32 | |
| Because there is a substantial amount of dirt. | 01:06:36 | |
| To be had. | 01:06:38 | |
| OK. Thank you. Thank you. | 01:06:41 | |
| Is there anyone else here to speak in favor of this? | 01:06:43 | |
| Please come forward, state your name. | 01:06:48 | |
| Yeah, my name is Garrett Dunaway with. | 01:06:57 | |
| Lock commercial real estate. My address is 1190 Wildwood Blue. | 01:07:00 | |
| Northwest Portland, IN 47112. | 01:07:04 | |
| My client, Larry Ragland, hired myself and LOP Real Estate to market and sell the property that's being discussed today along W | 01:07:08 | |
| Kneeball Rd. | 01:07:12 | |
| We first put it on the market late 2022. We garnered a lot of interest in the property and we've been under contract three times. | 01:07:17 | |
| It's falling apart those contracts for various reasons. | 01:07:22 | |
| The first time under contract, the user was looking to use the property for a trucking company, but the county engineer ended up | 01:07:29 | |
| denying this use as the roads weren't wide enough to support semis. | 01:07:35 | |
| Second time under contract, the buyer was looking to use the property as multifamily or assisted living. | 01:07:42 | |
| However. | 01:07:50 | |
| During his due diligence was trying to find out how close the sewers were. I knew they were in the area but we didn't know what | 01:07:52 | |
| the cost would be for that. | 01:07:56 | |
| Ultimately, this buyer, that buyer was, it was too expensive for him. | 01:08:00 | |
| That brings us to the third time under contract. | 01:08:07 | |
| As Jake said, initially looked into multifamily use. | 01:08:10 | |
| Knowing the potential issues with sewer, however, we ran into that next issue of water pressure. As the site currently sits, you | 01:08:14 | |
| can only put about four homes on the property due to the water pressure. | 01:08:20 | |
| Due to the lack of utilities and the infrastructure at this property, it really narrows the uses of the. | 01:08:28 | |
| This this side of the corridor. | 01:08:34 | |
| Has really lacked development and this is an opportunity to develop this side of the corridor that can benefit Georgetown as the. | 01:08:37 | |
| Georgetown community continues to grow. | 01:08:46 | |
| Myself and LOP Real Estate believe that this is the highest and best use for the property. | 01:08:50 | |
| That can benefit the community and it makes sense for the buyer, makes sense for the seller, and it makes sense again for the | 01:08:57 | |
| community as it continues to grow. | 01:09:02 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 01:09:07 | |
| There's somebody else there. | 01:09:09 | |
| Please come forward and let's try and make it short as we can. | 01:09:11 | |
| All right, as Garrett, I'm the property owner. I'm Larry Raglan, 1404 Edwardsville, Galena Rd. So I live just 2 1/2 blocks around | 01:09:17 | |
| away from the property. Now the, you know, return on investment. Just a reasonable return. And I'm not going to lie to you, when | 01:09:25 | |
| we when I bought this land and my partner nine years ago, yeah, I wanted to get the biggest bang for my buck and. | 01:09:33 | |
| You know, when again, we went through all those different phases, but what I'm hearing now and being in the community and I drive | 01:09:43 | |
| by this place every day. | 01:09:47 | |
| On my way home. | 01:09:51 | |
| You're looking at. | 01:09:53 | |
| You know, hold on to it, my partner. Let's hold on to it. Eventually developments come in. We can get a Big Bang for our bugs with | 01:09:55 | |
| sewers and water pressure. But when I saw this development by Mr. Elder. | 01:10:02 | |
| You know, I was willing to, you know, go back to just that, you know, reasonable return on investment and drop the and drop the | 01:10:11 | |
| price. | 01:10:15 | |
| I hear all the time it's too crowded, there's too many apartments, the traffic is terrible. | 01:10:20 | |
| This is the best. | 01:10:27 | |
| His development to me, is the best of both worlds. I don't have to hold on to it and wait it out. | 01:10:29 | |
| It's a nice facility. They've done their leg work for sure and. | 01:10:36 | |
| I look at it as a much needed. | 01:10:43 | |
| Uh, structure with low impact traffic and. | 01:10:47 | |
| Trust me, I drive that every day and the traffic is is terrible. So that's my spill. OK, Thank you very much. Is there anyone else | 01:10:51 | |
| speak in favor? | 01:10:56 | |
| OK. If not, need to hear from those opposed. We're going to have time limit. | 01:11:04 | |
| Are you going to reset it there? | 01:11:11 | |
| OK, you want to go for. | 01:11:15 | |
| You stood up first. Come on. | 01:11:17 | |
| State your name. | 01:11:19 | |
| Hold on, Hold on, hold on. Sorry. | 01:11:22 | |
| Say your name to microphone please with your address. | 01:11:28 | |
| My name is Ruth Shamaker. I live on 1412 W Canaveral Rd. My property was the largest piece of property there. I have 20 acres and | 01:11:31 | |
| I am north of what they're wanting to build this on. I reject this proposal in contrary to the existing zoning because it is | 01:11:39 | |
| residential and. | 01:11:47 | |
| Suburban. Whatever it is, anyway, I. | 01:11:56 | |
| I feel like it is very bad on that hill. And then my property, I have a slope, a good slope that's going to be coming from that. | 01:12:00 | |
| And it also the water that comes down goes into my Creek, it goes into my spring, spring there. It flows into the lake that the | 01:12:11 | |
| people are swimming with. And I feel like this is not what is good for us. They talked about the. | 01:12:21 | |
| Truck Well, this is all still going to flow into my property and the people that live below me. It just is not good for them. It's | 01:12:32 | |
| just a rolling hill. | 01:12:37 | |
| And I think it just interferes with. | 01:12:43 | |
| The public use of our property and until someone buys all that property. | 01:12:46 | |
| Below me or whatever. | 01:12:51 | |
| Then they can start seeing what they want to do with it. But I feel like that this should be rejected. It is unhealthy. | 01:12:54 | |
| I don't know what kind of lights they're going to have or anything like that. And. | 01:13:04 | |
| I just. | 01:13:08 | |
| Totally against it. It's just. | 01:13:10 | |
| Something that should not be there. | 01:13:13 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:13:15 | |
| State your name and your address. | 01:13:18 | |
| Rebecca Hernandez 1312 W Knavel I'm opposed to this due to the water. | 01:13:22 | |
| Umm, they say that the drainage is going to be sufficient. There's a lot of drainage right there at Knavel where the water runs | 01:13:29 | |
| off and they start messing with that hill. | 01:13:34 | |
| Is it going to make my basement flood now? Because I mean in that puts. | 01:13:41 | |
| The pond that they plan, is that sufficient to hold the amount of water? | 01:13:46 | |
| That they're going to disrupt on that pervious ground and make it all impervious. You're talking 6 acres and they say they don't | 01:13:52 | |
| intend at this point, but once they get the OK, they can expand it to the full expansion. | 01:13:59 | |
| It affects. | 01:14:08 | |
| Neighbors properties, it affects the lake and there's children that swim there. There's lots of studies on warm storm water. Rain | 01:14:10 | |
| off, run off. | 01:14:15 | |
| I have one from Purdue, one from Penn State if you would like them. I don't have copies for everybody. I have one copy of each. | 01:14:21 | |
| That I you want to submit it to the board and you can do that. | 01:14:30 | |
| If this is approved. | 01:14:43 | |
| I would request. | 01:14:46 | |
| A tree border around the whole perimeter, front and sides. | 01:14:48 | |
| At least 10 feet tall trees. | 01:14:54 | |
| To help with the water. | 01:14:56 | |
| That is a very steep slope. | 01:14:59 | |
| And we don't have any information on what their. | 01:15:03 | |
| They just say it's going to meet Floyd County guidelines. | 01:15:06 | |
| That's very vague. | 01:15:10 | |
| I would like more information on that. | 01:15:14 | |
| How they intend to meet the guidelines for the water that's going to affect all the residents in that community. | 01:15:17 | |
| And across, directly across from where they intend the driveway, the roads very narrow. | 01:15:23 | |
| There is no apartment complex. | 01:15:29 | |
| They're talking future when? | 01:15:31 | |
| 20 years from now, and in the meantime, the community that actually lives there has to. | 01:15:34 | |
| Deal with all the water issues, the lights. How many lights are there going to be all night long? | 01:15:41 | |
| Because it's going to be secure. | 01:15:47 | |
| So that means it has to be lit up. | 01:15:50 | |
| What we don't have any information on this? | 01:15:53 | |
| And it affects and yes, they want to say that there's a business right there, the animal shelter, it operates in a home. | 01:15:58 | |
| Like business front, it's a home front. | 01:16:05 | |
| The only business close to that is the mobile Home Park. | 01:16:09 | |
| Which is not cat is not right across or directly across, it's kind of on the corner. | 01:16:14 | |
| So this would be pushing the business district into our residential community even further. | 01:16:20 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:16:27 | |
| Please come forward and state your name and your address. | 01:16:30 | |
| My name is David Howell. I live at 1506 Pertle Drive. | 01:16:34 | |
| I'm one of the people who live in this little lake that you're speaking about. This lake is home to about 25 homes. It's used | 01:16:39 | |
| extensively through the summer. Kids are swimming in it all the time. If you've been back through that area, you will realize | 01:16:45 | |
| there is a very steep hill from the top his the property that they're Speaking of. It is the high point, the entire area and | 01:16:52 | |
| everything is flowing down that way. | 01:16:58 | |
| We're concerned about keeping the lake clean because we do maintain it. We put money every year for fish, for algae control. We | 01:17:05 | |
| truly take care of the land. It's also a good source for the wildlife. | 01:17:12 | |
| So Bert file in particular. | 01:17:20 | |
| But our biggest concern is. | 01:17:22 | |
| Keep the light clean. Also there is a very low point right at the front of the lake where if we do get extensive amount of water | 01:17:25 | |
| coming down that hill it could possibly flood the road making it impossible. It's one lane Rd. back to another community. More or | 01:17:31 | |
| less small community with that. | 01:17:36 | |
| Keep them blocked off. | 01:17:43 | |
| Also, if there is an extensive water drainage down that hill flooding the lake, it could damage the dam which we. | 01:17:45 | |
| The overall thing is. | 01:17:52 | |
| We're concerned about. | 01:17:55 | |
| What a runoff. | 01:17:57 | |
| And I do have some topical graphical maps showing how the high point is on their property and how it all kind of slopes down that | 01:17:58 | |
| way if you'd like to see it if you wish to submit that to the board. | 01:18:03 | |
| Thank you. I'll keep on to the board. Thank you. | 01:18:16 | |
| Thank you, Sir. OK. Thank you very much. | 01:18:19 | |
| OK. Is there anyone else? | 01:18:24 | |
| State your name and your address please. | 01:18:28 | |
| I'm Darlene Rush. I live at 1531 Lakeland Drive and I just want to follow up on what. | 01:18:30 | |
| David said that to clarify where that high point is of the. | 01:18:37 | |
| Mini shed proposed down to the lake that W Willis Rd. is the only exit. | 01:18:45 | |
| Entry and exit to those dead end streets, Lakeland Dr. Lake Rd. Allen Drive in the back part of Wells Rd. Those are all no outlet | 01:18:52 | |
| Denton streets. So you wouldn't be able to get dinner out you and mill get ambulance services back there. So I request the | 01:18:59 | |
| environmental study to make sure we're not going to have flooding back there and then also right there in front of where they're | 01:19:06 | |
| proposing on West can able that floods a lot when it rains anyway. So again, what just following up on what the other. | 01:19:14 | |
| Said that all that asphalt is going to cause a lot of runoff to all the lower points unless can able. | 01:19:21 | |
| Possibly back in West Willis, possibly into the lake and what David said about containing lake, which has been very clean, we | 01:19:31 | |
| tested every year. | 01:19:35 | |
| Cleaner than most of the drinking water from what the biologist tells us and and then the day. I'm just reiterating that that | 01:19:39 | |
| we're unsure of how much water would go into there and possibly cause the problem. | 01:19:47 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:19:55 | |
| Is there anybody else has anything any different? | 01:19:57 | |
| OK. If not, we're going to close that portion. | 01:20:00 | |
| And if you want to come up and. | 01:20:04 | |
| Address what they were talking about. | 01:20:08 | |
| Yes, thank you. | 01:20:11 | |
| All very reasonable concerns. | 01:20:13 | |
| And, you know, this isn't our first development. And, you know, lights, drainage and water runoff. | 01:20:16 | |
| There, I mean, that's every development. | 01:20:24 | |
| So Floyd County does have standards that we have to file. | 01:20:26 | |
| You know we're not going to have lights bleeding off the property. | 01:20:29 | |
| It is going to be a secure 24/7, gated up front, limited access in the evening. | 01:20:32 | |
| And so no whites would be able to be bled off. We want to keep everything on site, probably at the end of the building's, not | 01:20:38 | |
| anything facing the road. | 01:20:42 | |
| Also with the drainage there is Floyd County drainage walls are actually more stringent. | 01:20:47 | |
| In a while, you know for good reason and any development we do will be a pre and post runoff that we're going to have to meet. | 01:20:53 | |
| We've already retained Heritage Engineering, who's one of the top engineering firms in the area, and they would be able to work | 01:21:00 | |
| with the county to make sure the plans met. | 01:21:05 | |
| The standards. | 01:21:10 | |
| And in regards to the lake, with being on the other side, that would be something that would be taken into consideration. | 01:21:11 | |
| During the drainage plans to see what, if any, water runoff would get there, again, we would have to meet. | 01:21:17 | |
| All of the approved and. | 01:21:23 | |
| And all the requirements are acceptable. | 01:21:26 | |
| That helps answer some of those questions. | 01:21:29 | |
| Any other questions? The so the retention pond is there was there any? | 01:21:34 | |
| Calculations into your estimate here. Is that just a place also? | 01:21:38 | |
| This is more of just is the use approved? If it is, then we move forward and have a development plan approval. We're going to have | 01:21:43 | |
| to go meet, you know, might even be back either before the planning commissioner working with Mr. Creed to make sure that | 01:21:47 | |
| everything is met. | 01:21:52 | |
| You know, we'll submit our plans, we'll send them out to their third party engineers, we'll have comments, they'll get it back to | 01:21:58 | |
| make sure that everything's taken care of. | 01:22:01 | |
| OK. | 01:22:07 | |
| I just clarify that state your name and Justin Anderson crap. | 01:22:12 | |
| 126 W Spring Street. I was just saying we're not requesting a variance for drainage. And as you know, the drainage ordinance is | 01:22:18 | |
| the post runoff is likely to be less with your drainage ordinance. | 01:22:23 | |
| So that's not really before the board of. | 01:22:29 | |
| We're intend to comply with that. | 01:22:32 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:22:34 | |
| And once again, I'm going to state we do not have a full board. | 01:22:38 | |
| And it takes three to pass, and if it would happen to fail, it would be a year before you can come back again. | 01:22:42 | |
| You want to move forward. | 01:22:56 | |
| Does the board have a ballot? | 01:22:58 | |
| BJP. | 01:23:06 | |
| Don, could you come up to the mic please? | 01:23:37 | |
| The. | 01:23:48 | |
| We've listened to a lot of arguments here tonight. | 01:23:51 | |
| And when I'm preparing my ballot here. | 01:23:54 | |
| My probably my biggest thing is the fact that this is in the gate, the Edwardsville Gateway District. | 01:23:58 | |
| And that makes us totally different. | 01:24:05 | |
| Even though we say all this stuff in the comprehensive plan about maintaining rule, this, that and the other the comprehensive. | 01:24:09 | |
| The Gateway District has a very different set of standards to it in my opinion. | 01:24:15 | |
| It does and I am. I guess I want to feel confident. | 01:24:20 | |
| That saying this is in that gateway district. | 01:24:24 | |
| And it leads. | 01:24:28 | |
| It doesn't meet our standards for the Gateway District. | 01:24:31 | |
| With your office supports that. | 01:24:35 | |
| I can give you a little bit of background, OK, a little bit of background with 2011, 2000. It was 2011 that the county conducted | 01:24:38 | |
| the Gateway District plan. | 01:24:44 | |
| That included three sections for that, for that gateway, that included the Town Center section, which this property is located | 01:24:51 | |
| adjacent to, included the campus component, which is the Noble Park campus. And what were the average of schools considered? I | 01:24:58 | |
| think the Old Town a component of it. | 01:25:05 | |
| The rationale behind that was that to create distinct. | 01:25:12 | |
| Gateways into the community. There's only two that the county has control from planning. One is the one is a Highlander Point area | 01:25:18 | |
| right after the Greenville exit and this exit off the Edwards. | 01:25:23 | |
| And Georgia? | 01:25:29 | |
| So the underlying plan was to create a commercial area that had mixed uses that had a Town Center type of approach was. | 01:25:31 | |
| Was the rationale. So it had some distinct and it was a distinct. | 01:25:44 | |
| Area. | 01:25:48 | |
| Why they had? | 01:25:50 | |
| Sub sub plan for that area. | 01:25:53 | |
| So do you believe that this would substantially interfere with that plan for the gateway village that the county has? | 01:25:56 | |
| At the time, the county planner at that plan, yes. | 01:26:05 | |
| Thank you. | 01:26:11 | |
| OK. | 01:26:14 | |
| You have a ballot. I have a ballot. | 01:26:15 | |
| He wants to come back up. | 01:26:21 | |
| It's it's closed. | 01:26:24 | |
| So I get to ask. | 01:26:27 | |
| It's I don't, yeah. You guys can't allow him to state something. If he wants to state something, he doesn't get to the staff. | 01:26:30 | |
| I would think so, since there was a statement. What did you say? I would think we should allow this. | 01:26:40 | |
| Just a couple minutes, OK, It's going to be real quick. So this is actually a good conversation that I had with Mr. Creeby. I know | 01:26:49 | |
| you won't have that benefit and you were probably responsible for this being adopted, Mr. Loud, but. | 01:26:54 | |
| The gateway itself, I do find interesting this property when he talks about the three different areas, this property isn't even in | 01:27:00 | |
| that area. So the Town Center this is adjacent to, it's not in the Town Center. I will agree with you there. | 01:27:08 | |
| In this what happened with the gateway is then they came through and just made a big circle around the three different just to say | 01:27:15 | |
| hey. | 01:27:20 | |
| I think I can address that question. | 01:27:25 | |
| Gateway was part of the original 2006 Sony. It wasn't. It wasn't an addition to the 2011. So that Gateway District was created in | 01:27:27 | |
| 2006 and then the. | 01:27:33 | |
| In MSK, MSKS or M I'm sorry came back with the plan for that. | 01:27:40 | |
| But the overlay district. | 01:27:47 | |
| Great as part of the original changes of life in 2011. | 01:27:49 | |
| My last comment is I think this would be a good catalyst. | 01:27:56 | |
| Again, I've lived off the exit. There's been zero significant development in that entire corridor for well over a decade going | 01:27:59 | |
| from 64 to West W Conangle Rd. The free market should dictate within reason and what is allowed. You know, if you look at the | 01:28:07 | |
| plan, while I love the plan, it looks like it's calling Indiana. We're not Carmel, IN. I live here and you know, we continue to | 01:28:14 | |
| just rely on the studies that we pay for. And I would like for anybody to look and say what significant development has been been. | 01:28:22 | |
| From 62 through W Kneeble Rd. in that Town Center area. But I'll leave with that. Thank you all so much. Thank you. OK. Mr. | 01:28:29 | |
| FC-1124-48, Petitioner Elder Company, LLC. | 01:28:37 | |
| After careful review, the Board finds that number one, the special exception, will be injurious to the public health, safety, | 01:28:45 | |
| morals and general welfare of the community because the property is currently served by a three inch water line with near the | 01:28:50 | |
| nearest line at least 1500 feet away. | 01:28:55 | |
| Georgetown Fire Department provides minimum land requirement. | 01:29:00 | |
| To serve the development of this nature, to be 6 inch line with a hydrant within 400 feet of the building. | 01:29:04 | |
| #2 The use and the value of the area adjacent of the property, subject to the special exception, will not be affected in | 01:29:11 | |
| substantial adverse manner. Because the proposed use is relatively low impact with low traffic generation, it will not generate | 01:29:17 | |
| nuisance, noise or smells and will be required to meet stormwater standards. Storage is a reasonable use with proximity to multi | 01:29:24 | |
| family zone property and would be located next to an existing general commercial property. | 01:29:30 | |
| #3 The need for the special exception does not arise from some condition procure you to the property involved. | 01:29:37 | |
| Property was recently split from the homestead to to the northwest and has since remained vacant. The property is suitable for | 01:29:43 | |
| residential development consistent with the zoning and with current infrastructure. | 01:29:49 | |
| Allows up to four homes to be located on property #4 the strip application, the terms of Floyd County zoning ordinance. | 01:29:56 | |
| Will not result in unnecessary hardship in the use of the property because the property is currently suitable for single family | 01:30:05 | |
| development and a joint single family developments. | 01:30:10 | |
| #5 The approval of the special exception will interfere substantially with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 01:30:16 | |
| Because the proposed use is expressly prohibited in the FCCO for Floyd County Gateway Overlay District, the use does not fit into | 01:30:22 | |
| the planning. | 01:30:27 | |
| Documents for the area and is and is inconsistent with the district. Intense. The intent the use is low is a low intensity and low | 01:30:32 | |
| traffic use. This is a gateway district and adjacent to the Town Center. Concept identified economic growth areas. The use would | 01:30:38 | |
| not create significant active economic activity desired in a growth area. Aesthetically, the use would not be consistent with the | 01:30:45 | |
| existing planning guidelines. | 01:30:52 | |
| The use presents characteristics more consistent with industrial warehousing than aesthetic rule. Neighborhoods orientated | 01:30:59 | |
| commercial with multi large structures, low traffic volumes, security fence and limited landscaping and metal facades. The | 01:31:07 | |
| property also lacks necessary infrastructure for Fire Protection, water service. | 01:31:14 | |
| The Board of Zoning Appeal hereby denies the petitioner special exception that the meeting held on the 9th day of December, 2024 | 01:31:22 | |
| that completes my ballot. | 01:31:26 | |
| OK, you heard the ballot. Is there a second? | 01:31:31 | |
| I'll second. | 01:31:35 | |
| OK. It's been moved in second. | 01:31:37 | |
| All in favor signify by saying aye, aye opposed same sign. | 01:31:40 | |
| It's been denied. | 01:31:45 | |
| Thank you. | 01:31:47 | |
| So on these, I guess these are all moot. We don't do anything with the next. | 01:31:49 | |
| I assume you're willing you're wanting to withdraw those at this point in time. I would love to table them. | 01:31:56 | |
| I'm sorry, I would love to table them. | 01:32:00 | |
| Indefinitely until it's read. | 01:32:03 | |
| I don't know if we can table them indefinitely. | 01:32:06 | |
| So I'll move to the drill. | 01:32:09 | |
| OK. OK. Thank you very much. Has moved to withdraw items. | 01:32:11 | |
| Just for clarification, 4 through 7, is that correct, Mr. Elder? | 01:32:15 | |
| Question. | 01:32:20 | |
| If for some reason we're back here within the year, we have to repay our fees. | 01:32:21 | |
| For those who've been on the standard variances or is it just a simple, I will leave that to staff to answer that for you, Mr. | 01:32:26 | |
| So. | 01:32:38 | |
| What? Why don't we do this? Why don't we table it for this month since Nick's not here and next month Nick can answer that | 01:32:39 | |
| question for us. OK, Thank you all so much. So if you guys can move to just table those pursuant to the applicants requested to | 01:32:45 | |
| your motion to table, I make a motion to table 4 through the remaining 4 through 7. I'll second. | 01:32:51 | |
| OK, the motion has been made. All in favor. Second five to say aye, aye. Opposed. Same sign. Thank you. We can let Mr. Unruh come | 01:32:57 | |
| in. | 01:33:02 | |
| I guess we just need a motion to adjourn. | 01:33:12 | |
| Say there's no more, isn't the 4th floor? | 01:33:24 | |
| OK, thank you. Cheers now. Alrighty. | 01:33:30 | |
| So we're down to, we've finished through seven, they tabled 4 through 7. So you're just down to whether there's any more business | 01:33:33 | |
| by the staff. | 01:33:37 | |
| Don, anything else from the staff that we need to go over tonight? | 01:33:43 | |
| If that's the case, I ask for a motion to adjourn. I'll make a motion. I'll second it. Motion is second. All in favor signify aye | 01:33:47 | |
| aye. Those opposed likewise. Thanks guys. Do you have a copy? | 01:33:53 | |
| Gabrielle. | 01:34:01 | |
| Any of this I have no. | 01:34:03 | |
| The minutes we need those signed as well. Do you have a copy in your packet by chance? | 01:34:07 | |
| Yeah, I'm, I'm looking. | 01:34:13 | |
| You got that one. | 01:34:16 | |
| You got that? | 01:34:19 | |
| That one these blue. | 01:34:24 | |
| You get the Yeah, I have that one. | 01:34:29 | |
| I think that's it. | 01:34:31 | |
| I think that might be. | 01:34:36 |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Document list
| Document Name | Document type | |
|---|---|---|
| FC-11-24-52 - Elder Co.- DSV Transparency | General Document | |
| FC-11-24-51 - Elder Co.- DSV Lot Coverage | General Document | |
| FC-11-24-50 - Elder Co.- DSV Primary Structures | General Document | |
| FC-11-24-49 - Elder Co.- DSV Building Material | General Document | |
| FC-11-24-48 - Elder Co.- SE Mini Storage | General Document | |
| FC-11-24-46 - Aqua Indiana- SE Application | General Document | |
| FC-10-24-44 - The Farm - Admin Appeal | General Document |
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Transcript
| Some of the chest pressure had about 4:10. | 00:00:00 | |
| Yeah, yeah. | 00:00:05 | |
| Neelam. | 00:00:09 | |
| Okay. | 00:00:11 | |
| All right. Good evening, everybody. At this time, we're going to call to order. | 00:00:54 | |
| The December 9th Board of Zoning Appeals. At this time I'd like to stand and do the pledge allegiance. | 00:00:59 | |
| I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, | 00:01:08 | |
| indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. | 00:01:14 | |
| All right. Thank you very much. All right. This time roll call please. | 00:01:21 | |
| Dear here, here here. | 00:01:26 | |
| Here. | 00:01:30 | |
| All right, just kind of. | 00:01:33 | |
| On just kind of. | 00:01:37 | |
| Housekeeping here. | 00:01:39 | |
| Our Nick Creeby, his wife, is in the middle of having a baby, so Nick's not going to be here tonight. Don is going to stand in for | 00:01:41 | |
| him. | 00:01:45 | |
| Bill White's not here tonight, so I'm actually acting as president. | 00:01:50 | |
| And so you'll just have to put up with a. | 00:01:54 | |
| #2 not #1 so. | 00:01:58 | |
| Try to do the best I can. So at this time we I need a approval for the minutes of November. | 00:02:01 | |
| I have a correction on page 2. OK. | 00:02:08 | |
| I guess fourth line down, says Mr. People, Hauser recused himself from the air ring of property. That wasn't Mr. Bieber Hauser. | 00:02:14 | |
| That was me. | 00:02:18 | |
| So we need to get that changed so. | 00:02:22 | |
| Duly noted. So we have a motion with. | 00:02:26 | |
| Correction. | 00:02:30 | |
| I need a second I'll second. | 00:02:32 | |
| And a second all in favor signify by aye, I cannot vote. I was not here last month, so all right. | 00:02:34 | |
| OK, first item on the agenda is old business agenda item one FC-10-24-44 an administration administrative appeal. And Don, you | 00:02:42 | |
| help us out please. Good evening. Don Lock, director of planning and operations before you is FC Docket 10-24-44. The sporting | 00:02:49 | |
| club at the farm is my understanding talking with staff that notice was to be provided to to the joiners and other property | 00:02:57 | |
| owners. | 00:03:04 | |
| According to Miss Adams, as of the start of the meeting, the petitioners had not provided that notification. | 00:03:12 | |
| So with that. | 00:03:20 | |
| Since 9 was provided to the office and I understand that was part of the requirement, the board has the. | 00:03:23 | |
| Ability our authority to table that matter until they do provide notice or we can speak with Miss Fox on. | 00:03:30 | |
| An alternative method moving forward, but that's not a. | 00:03:39 | |
| As of right now, we do not have notice. | 00:03:44 | |
| So thank you guys. Choose to table it without sufficient notice. Just motion to approve it the table and you can ask them. | 00:03:48 | |
| Do you just, can you just say, can you deny it? | 00:04:00 | |
| Or do you move on? Or do you just table? | 00:04:04 | |
| Oh, I think that's from the. You can ask them if they have that notice but they just come forward. State your name and address for | 00:04:08 | |
| the records. You will Sir, please. | 00:04:11 | |
| Yes, Sir Joe Craig with Sporting Club at the Farm, 7209 Leafland Place, Prospect, KY. We reached out to the office twice two weeks | 00:04:16 | |
| ago. We had not received an updated letter to send out. The only one we had was dated for the November meeting, so we did not | 00:04:23 | |
| receive a new one. And then we got noticed last week from Nick's office saying that they had not gotten noticed from us, that we | 00:04:29 | |
| had not set them out and sent the letters out in time. But we were never provided with a updated letter to send out. | 00:04:35 | |
| OK. All right. Thank you. Thank you. | 00:04:43 | |
| I make a motion that we table it till next month. I'll second. OK, we have a motion a second. I'll signify by the aye aye. Those | 00:04:46 | |
| opposed likewise. All right, stable. Thank you. Sorry for those who made a trip apologize. | 00:04:53 | |
| OK. | 00:05:01 | |
| We'll let we'll let the room clear out for this item. | 00:05:08 | |
| Hey, Cortana, last minute. They were supposed to do that. | 00:05:14 | |
| I understand, yes. | 00:05:18 | |
| Well, they're they're not all. | 00:05:22 | |
| Yep. | 00:05:25 | |
| Looks like they've been done since 2019. | 00:05:28 | |
| All right, next. | 00:05:41 | |
| Next item is item 3 through 7. | 00:05:44 | |
| #3 through 7, correct? | 00:05:50 | |
| I'm sorry, I'm sorry, I'm sorry. | 00:05:53 | |
| My bad, I skipped 1. | 00:05:55 | |
| Next item is agenda item 2. | 00:05:57 | |
| FC-11-24-46 Special exception. | 00:06:02 | |
| Done once again. OK. And just for my edification. | 00:06:08 | |
| Mr. Creeby also provides a staff report upfront as part of his this part of the presentation. | 00:06:15 | |
| All right, so you have DOC and IMF C11-24 dash 46. The petitioner is Aqua Indiana Limber Release Sanitation Sanitary Works, Inc | 00:06:21 | |
| Location is Tanglewood Dr. Floyd Knobs 47119. Tax ID number is 220400700034.000006. The request is for a special exception which | 00:06:31 | |
| is a use variance, an expansion of a legal non conforming use. The district is residential. | 00:06:40 | |
| And so the overview of the. | 00:06:51 | |
| Case or the docket is the applicant is requesting to expand an existing legal non conforming use. The applicant is requesting to | 00:06:54 | |
| build a small office to assist in the operation of the existing wastewater treatment plant bill prior to the implementation of the | 00:07:00 | |
| 2006 Floyd County Zoning ordinance. | 00:07:06 | |
| The office will be a conversion of a manufactured home with a four area of 713 square feet. | 00:07:13 | |
| Adjacent Properties The property is located to the north of Wimberley Woods Subdivision, zoned Rs to the northeast of Charlotte. | 00:07:20 | |
| Charlotte Ridge across Creek to the north and east are rural residential zones, single family lots. Into the West is a rural | 00:07:28 | |
| residential zoned undeveloped lot. | 00:07:34 | |
| Does he go through each annulment of the best so his the staff findings, the special exception will not be injurious to public | 00:07:42 | |
| health, safety, morals and welfare of the community building. | 00:07:49 | |
| Project will facilitate the operation of the utility. The structure will be built Apple to applicable building code and not create | 00:07:56 | |
| any physical hazards to nearby properties. | 00:08:01 | |
| The use of value of the adjacent area adjacent the property subject to the special exception will not be affected in a | 00:08:07 | |
| substantially adverse manner. The site is is the location of the wastewater treatment plant with utility structures. Addition of a | 00:08:13 | |
| small office building will not significantly. | 00:08:18 | |
| Significantly alter the use of property. The need for the special session does arise from us from some condition peculiar to the | 00:08:25 | |
| property involved. The use is a legal, non conforming use since it was constructed before current zoning restrictions apply. The | 00:08:31 | |
| strict application of the zoning of the terms of the Floyd County Zoning Ordinance will result in an unnecessary hardship in the | 00:08:37 | |
| use of the property. | 00:08:43 | |
| Expansion of legal non conforming uses. | 00:08:50 | |
| Require a special exception approval The approval of a special exception will not contradict the goals and objectives of Floyd | 00:08:53 | |
| County Comprehensive Plan. The approval will support the operation of a utility providing adequate infrastructure to the | 00:08:59 | |
| community. Staff Recommendations Maintain wooded screening of the structure from neighborhood neighboring properties. Provide | 00:09:05 | |
| additional vegetation screening of the proposed structure to include Evergreen trees a minimum of 6 feet in height to the | 00:09:11 | |
| structure in any roadway. | 00:09:17 | |
| And that is the staff report. | 00:09:23 | |
| All right, Thank you. Anybody have any questions for Don? No, no, but a question, Christy, because we don't have a full board, we | 00:09:27 | |
| need an offer to make that offer. Yeah, of course. So the applicant does have a right to be heard by the full board if they choose | 00:09:32 | |
| to do so. And that applies for all the agenda items this evening. If you wish to table your item till next month for a full board, | 00:09:38 | |
| you most certainly can do that. You would need to let the board know that prior to them taking the matter under consideration of | 00:09:43 | |
| voting on it. So. | 00:09:48 | |
| If that is something that the applicant wishes to do on any of these agenda items, please let us know. | 00:09:54 | |
| So we can take care of that. | 00:09:59 | |
| Thank you, Christy. | 00:10:01 | |
| No questions for Don. | 00:10:03 | |
| OK. | 00:10:06 | |
| At this at this time the applicant can come forward. | 00:10:07 | |
| State your name and address for the record Sir, please. | 00:10:13 | |
| Yes, Sir, Scott Cycle, Midwestern engineers representing Aqua Indiana and Wimbledon. Wimberley Sanitary Works. | 00:10:17 | |
| I address is 6809 corporate Dr. Indianapolis, IN 46278. | 00:10:26 | |
| I have nothing to add except for specific questions from the board as long as there's a quorum present and the board can. | 00:10:32 | |
| Act on this special exception tonight. I have no issue going to a full board, so as long as that's not an issue. | 00:10:41 | |
| I won't, I won't request to go to so they have everybody can, everybody can vote. | 00:10:50 | |
| Nobody has recused themselves at this point on this agenda and you do have a quorum, which is for it, Desert car, three of them to | 00:10:56 | |
| vote in favor. The other thing that I did want to pass along. | 00:11:01 | |
| In correspondence, we had not submitted, sorry, we had not submitted our orange or these green cards for that yet, but I did want | 00:11:07 | |
| to. | 00:11:12 | |
| I did want to state to this board that there were six that were not returned. One of those was returned as undeliverable, so we | 00:11:21 | |
| did receive the letter back, but the other five we never received a card back from. | 00:11:27 | |
| Are descendant. | 00:11:36 | |
| Right. So as long as you have proof that you sent it, then you're yes. Yeah, we had some. | 00:11:37 | |
| We did send scans of the certified letter receipts and then those green cards in response. | 00:11:46 | |
| Yeah, go ahead, you're finished. Yes, Sir. Any, any questions I'll be happy to answer. | 00:11:57 | |
| OK. This, this building that you're putting up, is that going to be like a mobile home basically or what is it? | 00:12:02 | |
| So it is a pre manufactured unit. | 00:12:13 | |
| We're designing the foundation right now to go through Department of Homeland Security for the foundation release, but it will be | 00:12:17 | |
| delivered and then anchored down to the foundation, which will be a slab foundation. So it'd be a slab. What would block then on | 00:12:24 | |
| top then or what? Or we're not fully through design of the foundation yet, but my. | 00:12:31 | |
| Impression of what it will look like is a slab, and then the building will actually be anchored to the slab as opposed to built up | 00:12:39 | |
| on block. | 00:12:43 | |
| Unless there's a requirement to raise that finished floor to a certain elevation. | 00:12:49 | |
| Well, that's what I was looking at. It's pretty low there. I was wondering about flooding in that Creek there. Yeah. So we'll take | 00:12:53 | |
| a look at that, but. | 00:12:57 | |
| Our first step was to get through this process before we we came through the rest of that. | 00:13:01 | |
| Yeah. The actual elevation that you see next to the plant is probably 4 to 5 foot difference in your 40 foot out and 46 foot. So | 00:13:06 | |
| we're, you know, almost 9090 foot. | 00:13:11 | |
| And that's at least 5 foot difference in elevation. | 00:13:17 | |
| From one end to the other, yes, yes. And it's in a flood. It's in a floodplain or floodway or something. It's right next to a | 00:13:21 | |
| Creek, so. | 00:13:24 | |
| We're concerned that what you're going to set that on. | 00:13:29 | |
| If you're saying a slab that would be it almost looked like a little treatment plant. | 00:13:35 | |
| Digesters or something, you know, maybe a huge slab of concrete that would be exposed. So we're just wondering how that what I | 00:13:42 | |
| mean that's that's going to really look. | 00:13:46 | |
| Out of place, right next to the entrance of the road. | 00:13:50 | |
| So we will take elevation under consideration at that design time and then when we get to building Commission, we can go through | 00:13:54 | |
| that with them at that point. | 00:13:58 | |
| Would you ever consider putting it inside the fence in front of your in front of your one block building that you have there that | 00:14:02 | |
| would already be in the fence. | 00:14:07 | |
| We were up there today, the gate was left open and the building was unlocked and unattended. So, you know, probably more more that | 00:14:12 | |
| we can get inside that secured area would probably better for, for the for the public. | 00:14:18 | |
| And you know, you may have to go to a smaller trailer. | 00:14:26 | |
| And then I will ask my next question to you first. | 00:14:29 | |
| May I approach? Sure absolutely please. | 00:14:34 | |
| So this is kind of our. | 00:14:37 | |
| Your your suggesting just slide it right if you can put it, if you can put it in right next to that, that building outside here, I | 00:14:41 | |
| think you got enough room you can pull your electric right off of that and it's going to save you a ton of money. | 00:14:51 | |
| See if they are, I'm not sure exactly the use of this building or what it's your motor control centers and your electrical and all | 00:15:00 | |
| that good stuff is what's in there. So I mean, you couldn't block the door, which each does say excess. | 00:15:06 | |
| But then what, what comes, what question that we had is what's changed with this operation? | 00:15:12 | |
| From now versus you know? | 00:15:19 | |
| Five years ago is is this building going to be used for a full time staff or temporary staff? I cannot totally speak to what Aqua | 00:15:22 | |
| is going to do full time or temporary. I do know that they have a desire to have more of a presence in this. This isn't the only | 00:15:28 | |
| treatment plant they have in this area. | 00:15:35 | |
| So this seems to be a logical point for them to place someone to be able to address all of their sewage facilities. | 00:15:43 | |
| I mean, normally these package plants, I call them can't afford a full time operator, correct. And so I think you know, I guess | 00:15:51 | |
| when in in the conception of the state everybody. | 00:15:58 | |
| I would say it would assume that it's going to be maintained by part time person and there was never going to be a full time staff | 00:16:05 | |
| staff at this location. | 00:16:10 | |
| And how many employees possibly would be at this location if you used it for a satellite office? | 00:16:15 | |
| I would adventure to say again, I can't speak exactly to how their long term use looks like right, but I would venture to say one, | 00:16:22 | |
| possibly two people they may run billing out of this for the area. So that would be a full time person that that I cannot speak in | 00:16:28 | |
| any detail other than conjecture. I personally would have a hard time voting anyway on this with not having these answers | 00:16:34 | |
| answered. | 00:16:40 | |
| So I mean in in good spirit for the the county and doing what's right. | 00:16:47 | |
| We really got to know what's going on with that building. | 00:16:53 | |
| And if there's any way it could be moved inside, that's that's not. | 00:16:56 | |
| And this is a newly constructed building. | 00:17:00 | |
| Newly prefabricated. I'm sorry, it's newly. You're not. It's not used structuring it will be new construction, that's correct. | 00:17:06 | |
| I mean the size, is that the smallest that that outfit builds or how was that determined that? I do not know, but I can find out | 00:17:12 | |
| that answer for you, OK. | 00:17:17 | |
| It goes along with yours. | 00:17:24 | |
| Here it goes on with your concerns. Yeah, yeah, I just, I need to know more answers, but all right, So anybody have any other | 00:17:25 | |
| questions for? | 00:17:29 | |
| Scott. | 00:17:34 | |
| Thank you, Scott. Appreciate it. So moving forward. | 00:17:45 | |
| Well, we're going to let the public. We have to open up to the public. They let the public speak and then you have an opportunity | 00:17:49 | |
| to come back up if you wish to ask for a table. And you do have to do that the next time you come up before they take it under | 00:17:53 | |
| consideration. | 00:17:57 | |
| All right. At this time, we'd like to call anybody that would like to come up and speak in favor of this project, in favor of the | 00:18:03 | |
| project. | 00:18:07 | |
| In favor? Yes Sir. | 00:18:12 | |
| You like it? | 00:18:14 | |
| OK, that being nobody now. Now we need anybody that would like to speak in opposition. Please come forward. | 00:18:16 | |
| All righty, come forward. | 00:18:24 | |
| And just state your name and address for the record Sir, please. | 00:18:28 | |
| My name is Clyde Harrelson, I live at 40. | 00:18:33 | |
| 4059 Tanglewood Dr. which is the street that structure is supposed to be put on at the beginning of our subdivision. | 00:18:36 | |
| Briefly, I want to stage it 20 years ago they. | 00:18:44 | |
| This company came before us with a meeting about increasing our race from 35 to 60 to $80.00 a month over A2 year period because | 00:18:47 | |
| they put in an extreme amount of growth. | 00:18:52 | |
| The price has never dropped even though they've added on customers after customer after customer. | 00:18:58 | |
| We were asked at that meeting why we aren't billed based on our water consumption like most other places that get billed for | 00:19:04 | |
| sewage. They said they were working on that and 20 years later they still haven't rolled that out. | 00:19:09 | |
| It was also after in that meeting how we contact them the number they had listed on their fence. | 00:19:17 | |
| Was another working number. | 00:19:22 | |
| They resolve that by taking the number down. If you if you were out there today you would have seen the sign announced who they | 00:19:24 | |
| are. No way to get a hold of them if there was a sewage overflow. I tried to look them up on Google, couldn't find them on Google. | 00:19:30 | |
| Indianapolis is the closest place Aqua is listed at. | 00:19:36 | |
| Over the years, higher mode out front area. | 00:19:43 | |
| Other neighbors would keep it mowed. | 00:19:46 | |
| There'd be times when they didn't get their mowing done. Sometimes we'd help them out and mow it, other times we wouldn't. But | 00:19:48 | |
| they're never, as a good neighbor, come over to try to help us keep our area mode. They would keep trash cans out in front. | 00:19:55 | |
| The entire week. | 00:20:02 | |
| Two years ago I stopped and asked them why they did that and they said there was number reason to bring him in. I said we we live | 00:20:04 | |
| in this subdivision and it looks. | 00:20:08 | |
| Very bad to drive into our subdivision every day and see 3 or 4 trash cans and these are these big waste cans. | 00:20:13 | |
| I didn't get anywhere until I mentioned there's no way you could be using 4 trash cans a week. | 00:20:21 | |
| With a wastewater plant, it turns out the employees that work there bring their trash and drop it in. Today I took a picture of | 00:20:25 | |
| the four trash cans. They're no longer in our drive. They only get halfway back to their fenced in area. They used to be kept in | 00:20:31 | |
| the fenced in area when the last year they don't even get that form. | 00:20:37 | |
| One trash can had three household garbage bags in another one had one. Another one had one. | 00:20:44 | |
| It's not fair for us to pay for their employees to use those bins as a garbage can as a as to save on their garbage. Again, that's | 00:20:49 | |
| not being a good neighbor. | 00:20:54 | |
| Nowhere on the plan is there mention of parking. | 00:21:00 | |
| The right hand side is almost useless for parking if they just park along the drive. I don't know how that would sit well with the | 00:21:04 | |
| fire department, but currently the people one or two trucks that show up during the week they park inside that fenced area. | 00:21:11 | |
| Our question, one of the questions we have as a subdivision was how many people are going to be working there and of course you've | 00:21:22 | |
| already brought that up. | 00:21:25 | |
| The structure itself is a shed. | 00:21:29 | |
| It's not a, it's not a, it's a prefab home. | 00:21:31 | |
| But basically when you drop that on a on a concrete slab, you're basically putting a shed down. | 00:21:35 | |
| They didn't check off on the requirements the list to include sewage. | 00:21:41 | |
| I would assume they would have to have a bathroom in there, but on that special documents both items that. | 00:21:46 | |
| That concern, septic tanks are not checked. | 00:21:52 | |
| It's on the second page of their own. | 00:21:56 | |
| They're avitated. | 00:21:59 | |
| So I was concerned why they would not check that off and provide it to the county to show what they're going to do for tapping | 00:22:00 | |
| sewage and. | 00:22:04 | |
| Run in water. | 00:22:08 | |
| The Creek does flood. It'll go into. | 00:22:11 | |
| It'll go on to Buck Creek and cover it on some of the turns. So that is that does happen quite frequently. So we know we're in a | 00:22:14 | |
| floodplain. | 00:22:18 | |
| I like to. I like that the question was asked. Why not put it inside the fence? | 00:22:23 | |
| It looks like they have enough parcel on the back of side, but it would be more expensive to clear that probably, but it would | 00:22:28 | |
| look a lot nicer than having a shed when you pull into our subdivision. | 00:22:33 | |
| Leaving it word if you allow them to do that and put it outside the fence. | 00:22:39 | |
| We don't need decorative trees there. We need it secured some kind of fence and you, you were there today and the place was | 00:22:44 | |
| unlocked that. | 00:22:48 | |
| That's just not, that's just uncalled for. I mean, they've got to be better citizens than that to help us as homeowners in that | 00:22:51 | |
| subdivision. | 00:22:55 | |
| I would suggest, I would hope that we don't vote today and put it off another another month until they get more of these answers | 00:23:03 | |
| back for us. | 00:23:07 | |
| But if you do vote, I hope you keep in mind that. | 00:23:10 | |
| I can't put a shed in front of my house. There's no way you would ever approve that. | 00:23:14 | |
| And that's basically what you're going to do today. If you say yes, you're going to prove a **** going in front of our | 00:23:19 | |
| subdivision. It's bad enough we have the cinder block plant, but that's a need for us. | 00:23:24 | |
| We don't need an office building. They could rent office space anywhere. | 00:23:29 | |
| Employ knobs, Galena. | 00:23:33 | |
| That's all. Thank you. Sir. Can you hold on for a second? I just want to ask you a question. | 00:23:37 | |
| In regards to the. | 00:23:42 | |
| The flooding, the entrance that you come into that subdivision where the box covered is, does it go across that road? | 00:23:45 | |
| All right. Anybody else? We still got 5 minutes and a half to. Anybody has any other that's in opposition? | 00:23:55 | |
| Just state your name and and your address for the record please. | 00:24:07 | |
| So having the sewer plant in your backyard is not a selling, it's not a good selling point for your home. And it does put out, you | 00:24:16 | |
| know, smells that sometimes of the year. So like we don't want to draw attention to that being in our neighborhood. So putting a | 00:24:23 | |
| building. | 00:24:30 | |
| Out there is gonna, I think, like. | 00:24:39 | |
| Raise the visible. | 00:24:41 | |
| Notion that you can see that there is a sewer plant right in front of where our our homes are. So that's why I don't also don't | 00:24:44 | |
| think it's a great idea. | 00:24:50 | |
| Thank you. Thank you, Terry. | 00:24:56 | |
| Now do we mention the letter? | 00:24:58 | |
| The health department letter, I'm not sure why that's not in the file. I think that be a question. Are they not using bathrooms? | 00:25:01 | |
| Why didn't why don't they have the necessary health department letter? | 00:25:06 | |
| Maybe Gabrielle can answer that. | 00:25:10 | |
| OK. | 00:25:18 | |
| OK. | 00:25:22 | |
| OK. And then next question is we have a letter from Corey Cochran. Do we need to? | 00:25:27 | |
| We will have a letter from Corey Cochran as well as Alan Platt that were submitted into the record. We should have a copy of | 00:25:32 | |
| those. I have a copy of those as well. | 00:25:38 | |
| Just he starts out by, well, I'm writing, I write in opposition to the placement of what has been described. So I'm not going to | 00:25:45 | |
| read the whole letter. Correct. And I believe the other one, Alan Platt is the same thing. They're in opposition to placement. OK, | 00:25:52 | |
| what was the name again? For the record? Alan Alan Platt. Platt. | 00:25:59 | |
| All right. Anybody else? We still have 4 minutes. | 00:26:08 | |
| Anybody else? | 00:26:14 | |
| OK. Scott, would you like come up and? | 00:26:15 | |
| Point of clarification. | 00:26:22 | |
| On your two letters in opposition to placement, is that opposition and placement altogether or in location as was your question? | 00:26:24 | |
| One of them was just saying that I know what the one that I read said. | 00:26:33 | |
| They wanted to be more appropriate. | 00:26:38 | |
| And aesthetically to a subdivision as opposed to a. | 00:26:40 | |
| Modular. | 00:26:45 | |
| They they were, so they they wanted to look more like it would fit into their subdivision. OK. It looked more like a house. Yeah. | 00:26:47 | |
| Instead of trailer, he's more against the pre manufactured building. Yes. | 00:26:52 | |
| If you like, we will read this. If you'd like for us to do that, are we? | 00:26:58 | |
| Do we have right to those letters? If we could just get copies, though, that would be sufficient. | 00:27:05 | |
| Gabrielle, are you OK with us giving cop these two copies and you can place a copy in the? | 00:27:13 | |
| You want to come look at them and just hand them? Turn for us, please. | 00:27:18 | |
| Make sure they're the ones that were given to us. | 00:27:22 | |
| Yeah, confirm that they're right. | 00:27:25 | |
| We can turn on that fan if you want to run that thing. | 00:27:33 | |
| This was something that the department. | 00:27:37 | |
| If they want, that's fine. Yeah, that'll that'll work just fine then. | 00:27:40 | |
| I have no other questions other than request a table so that I can answer the other questions. | 00:27:51 | |
| I appreciate that we need just so that I'm clear. | 00:27:57 | |
| This board. | 00:28:01 | |
| Would like answers to staffing levels on this yearly basis and hours per week, is that correct? Yes, also the ability to move that | 00:28:02 | |
| inside the existing fencing and then I. | 00:28:09 | |
| Can we reduce the footprint and maybe use a smaller building? Yes, is that does that cover the questions? Well, I think you need | 00:28:17 | |
| think you need to verify where the floor elevation would have to be as a result of that Creek. | 00:28:23 | |
| You know, are you going to have, is it going to be sitting 4 foot out of the ground, 6 foot out of the ground? | 00:28:29 | |
| I think you need to verify that. | 00:28:37 | |
| As part of this, I don't think we're necessarily looking at a smaller building, but this 115 1/2 feet by 46 feet. That's why I | 00:28:39 | |
| asked, is it a trailer? So that's that was a question on it. And I think that's their concern also, is it something like a | 00:28:46 | |
| trailer? Is it actually going to be an office building or at like that? So and that goes along with the one letter you got. I | 00:28:54 | |
| think you ought to consider something that's more aesthetically pleasing, more fitting with the neighborhood. Yes, yes. | 00:29:01 | |
| OK. And Don, when it comes in for their building permit that will dictate how many parking places and so forth. Our regs will | 00:29:09 | |
| dictate how many parking places they have to provide on it. | 00:29:14 | |
| Just basically a part would be a number of employed. | 00:29:21 | |
| Something will dictate. They'll be told they have to have so many parking places. | 00:29:24 | |
| That's right. And that's going to require you to enlarge that, obviously enlarge that area. So if it goes outside the gate, it's | 00:29:28 | |
| going to. | 00:29:31 | |
| Those are all. | 00:29:36 | |
| Building permission questions, is that correct? And then this is just special exception for land use, correct? OK, so tabled would | 00:29:39 | |
| go to. | 00:29:44 | |
| The January meeting, is that correct? Correct. That's correct. | 00:29:50 | |
| Then does correspondence need to be sent so many days prior to that hearing? You do not have to re notice and you can work with | 00:29:54 | |
| the staff to ask any other questions like that, but you don't have to re notice because you're making the announcement here at | 00:29:59 | |
| this mean that it will be tabled assuming the board votes to table at which. | 00:30:04 | |
| OK. | 00:30:09 | |
| So just work with the applicants questions. | 00:30:10 | |
| OK. Thank you for your time. | 00:30:14 | |
| I need a motion. I'll make a motion to table this till next month. | 00:30:17 | |
| Motion is second all in favor. Second by aye aye. Those opposed likewise. Thank you. | 00:30:22 | |
| OK, before we get started, Don. | 00:30:27 | |
| Adams I make sure I'm right this time. Item 3 through 7. | 00:30:32 | |
| Christy and I have talked and her advice, I'm going to recluse myself from those items and leave the room and. | 00:30:38 | |
| You'll have to take over for me, big guy. OK. All right. Thank you. | 00:30:47 | |
| OK. Next item of business is agenda item number three and through 7 which is FC-1124-4811. | 00:30:53 | |
| Let's just do the one, OK? It's gonna see if we could do them all together, is what I was gonna ask. | 00:31:06 | |
| You through about yourself and then you have to do 3 and then you can do the development. Depending on how that turns out we can | 00:31:13 | |
| decide to get to do with the other ones. OK. The agenda item FC-311-2448 Special exception applicant is requesting a special | 00:31:21 | |
| exception to allow many storage in residential suburban zoned area and in the Edwardsville overlay district. | 00:31:29 | |
| The Elder Company LLC, 1320 W Knavel Rd. Georgetown, IN. | 00:31:37 | |
| Section 36, Township 2, Range 5 E. Would you please, Mr. Lough, give us a staff report? | 00:31:44 | |
| This is docket item FC11-24-48 Petitioners Elder Company, LLC location 1320 W Knavel Rd. Georgetown, IN 47122 tax number tax IDs | 00:31:54 | |
| or 220203600086.00. | 00:32:03 | |
| Dash .002 and 220203600082. That point 00-002. The request is a special exception for many storage. The district is residential | 00:32:14 | |
| suburban. It is also in the Edwardsville Gateway Overlay district. | 00:32:23 | |
| The applicant is requesting a special exception to allow many warehouse self storage use on a residential suburban zone property. | 00:32:33 | |
| The property is also located in the Edwardsville Overlay District. | 00:32:39 | |
| Mini Storage is not an allowed use in a residential suburban zone in the FC Floyd County Zoning Ordinance Appendix Land Use Matrix | 00:32:45 | |
| and is expressly prohibited in the Gate Edwardsville Gateway District. | 00:32:52 | |
| Yes, Floyd County Ordinance 8.06 Dash 1 Warehousing and Storage are permitted uses in office, business and general industrial | 00:33:00 | |
| districts in the zoning ordinance. | 00:33:05 | |
| The proposal includes 13 storage units. | 00:33:12 | |
| A 400 square foot maintenance unit and a 400 square foot office with a service. | 00:33:15 | |
| Kiosks. The total square footage of the storage units will be 91,800 square feet. A lot coverage is approximately 69% of the 6.7 | 00:33:21 | |
| acre Watt 8. Parking spaces are located in front of the office with a detention base and located in front of the lot. The | 00:33:28 | |
| applicant is also requesting development standard variances for building materials, number of primary structures, lot coverage and | 00:33:34 | |
| building facade transparency. | 00:33:41 | |
| The adjacent property to the east and southeast of properties Interstate 64 made it lead to the South is it now Edwardsville | 00:33:49 | |
| Animal Clinic and a non conforming use on residential suburban zoned property operating prior to the 2006 zoning ordinance to the | 00:33:55 | |
| immediate SW across W enables a single family dwelling in the general commercial zone. Clayton Homes is located behind that | 00:34:01 | |
| property to the West. | 00:34:08 | |
| As a single family. | 00:34:15 | |
| So OK, behind that property to the West is a single family line and farm and off to the family zone property in the northwest is a | 00:34:18 | |
| residential suburban single family dwelling split from this property in 2022, and to the north is a large 20 acre residential | 00:34:24 | |
| suburban lot with a single family dwelling. | 00:34:30 | |
| Staff findings The special exception will be injurious to public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The | 00:34:37 | |
| property is currently served by a three inch water line with the nearest larger line at least 1500 feet away. Georgetown Fire | 00:34:44 | |
| Department provides the minimum provided the minimum line required to serve a development of this nature via 6. | 00:34:51 | |
| 6 inch line with a hydrant within 400 feet of any building, but recommended at least an 8 inch line. | 00:35:00 | |
| The use and value of the adjacent properties subject to the special section. | 00:35:07 | |
| Will he's got will not be affected except first are substantially adverse manner. The proposed use is relatively low impact with | 00:35:13 | |
| low traffic generation, will not generate nuisance noise or smells and will be required to meet storm water standards. Storage is | 00:35:20 | |
| a reasonable use with the proximity multi zone family property and will be located to existing general commercial property. | 00:35:28 | |
| The need for the special exception does not arise. | 00:35:36 | |
| Conditions particular to the property involved. | 00:35:40 | |
| Property was recently split from a homestead to the northwest and has since remained vacant. Properties suitable for residential | 00:35:43 | |
| development consistent with its Sony with current infrastructure, allows up to four homes to be located there. | 00:35:49 | |
| The strict application of the Floyd County zoning ordinance. | 00:35:56 | |
| They're both underlined. | 00:36:09 | |
| From his staff report, they're both undermined. | 00:36:12 | |
| So I think he's saying it will not. He says the property is currently suitable for single family developments and enjoined single | 00:36:19 | |
| family developments so following the zoning ordinance would not result in unnecessary hardship. | 00:36:25 | |
| The property is suitable for single family developments and adjacent, so I apologize. | 00:36:33 | |
| Nick left at 4:00. | 00:36:40 | |
| In short order, the approval of the special exception will contradict the GOES and objectives of the Floyd County Comprehensive | 00:36:44 | |
| Plan. The proposed use is an expressly prohibited in the zoning ordinance for the Edwardsville Gateway Overlay District. The use | 00:36:50 | |
| does not fit into the planning documents for the area and is inconsistent with the district intent. The use is a low intensity, | 00:36:56 | |
| low traffic use. This is a gateway district and adjacent Town Center concept and identified economic growth areas. The use would | 00:37:01 | |
| not create significant active. | 00:37:07 | |
| Activity desired in the growth area. Aesthetically, the use would not be consistent with existing planning guidelines. The use | 00:37:14 | |
| presents characteristics more consistent with industrial warehousing than aesthetically. Rural, neighborhood oriented commercial | 00:37:20 | |
| with multiple large structures, low novel traffic volume, security fencing, limited landscaping, metal facades, and the doors. The | 00:37:26 | |
| property also lacks necessary infrastructure for Fire Protection and water service. Staff Recommendations Denial due to not | 00:37:32 | |
| meeting the. | 00:37:38 | |
| Applications, particularly with the use being inconsistent with the Gateway Plan and Floyd County Comprehensive Plan and the lack | 00:37:44 | |
| of infrastructure. | 00:37:48 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. Does the Board have any questions for Mr. Law? | 00:37:53 | |
| Mr. Bieber, has you got any questions? No, thank you. OK. | 00:38:05 | |
| Would the applicant please come forward and state what you're going to do? | 00:38:09 | |
| And keep in mind that we have a quorum. There's only three of us here. It takes three votes and we normally have 5 S If you want | 00:38:13 | |
| to table it, please let us know. | 00:38:20 | |
| I do not thank you so much for the time and for being here. My name is Jake Elder with the Elder company, 501 E Pearl St. New | 00:38:27 | |
| Albany, IN. Also with me is Scott Hannah Heritage engineering and also Justin Hindrance with young women craft. | 00:38:34 | |
| Before we get started acting, Mr. President, I would request that the 10 minute time period be extended and that the procedures be | 00:38:43 | |
| lifted. This is a very complex issue and we want to make sure to preserve the record. | 00:38:49 | |
| Board, what do you think? That's up to you all as a board to make that decision whether or not you want to extend the time. You | 00:38:56 | |
| could also let it go for the time period and see where they are, I mean. | 00:39:00 | |
| What do you want to do? Board up to your discretion, say let him get started and see. OK, we'll see how we do. | 00:39:06 | |
| OK. Thank you so much. | 00:39:11 | |
| You all are essentially a quasi judicial board, an unbiased board and it's. | 00:39:14 | |
| Petitioners obligation to meet the burden as to whether or not the use of variance request should be granted or should be denied. | 00:39:18 | |
| These standards are protected with the state and federal government. | 00:39:26 | |
| Process, due process, civil rights, and so forth. | 00:39:30 | |
| There's been a recent case in Tipton County Board zoning appeals. We hope for hurting 230 N Sea 3rd 3/22 to 20/20/28 court appeals | 00:39:34 | |
| case and it talks about the type of evidence in what way you should give to it. | 00:39:41 | |
| And it talks about the evidence, at minimum, must be substantial. | 00:39:49 | |
| Evidence. It must be more than speculation or conjecture. | 00:39:53 | |
| Gaining Damian pulled the pills actually reversed the easiest decision because the BCA board listened more to. | 00:39:56 | |
| Speculation, opinion of neighbors and demonstrators versus the evidence that was presented. | 00:40:03 | |
| Do you all have a copy of the petition itself in front of you where we can kind of go through the site plan and withdraw? | 00:40:08 | |
| I don't have the whole thing, but I got. | 00:40:17 | |
| Bits and pieces of it, but I got that drawing. That's what you're asking. They all have a copy of it accessible they've reviewed. | 00:40:19 | |
| I'm happy to present as we go give any questions, OK. | 00:40:26 | |
| So if we look at the. | 00:40:32 | |
| The site plan itself. | 00:40:33 | |
| It's 1320 W Canable Rd. We know where it's located. | 00:40:36 | |
| It doesn't have water capacity out front? Or does it have sewer? | 00:40:40 | |
| Availability in. | 00:40:46 | |
| And so originally, we're looking at this for potential multifamily use after going through the due diligence process we landed on. | 00:40:48 | |
| Many storage units. | 00:40:54 | |
| We were trying to take into account the neighbors to the North and South. You'll see where we positioned the facility back off the | 00:40:56 | |
| road a substantial way versus having it all the way up towards the front of the road for view shed so that the animal. | 00:41:03 | |
| Hospital as well as the neighbor to the north and they're looking at their front door, they would not see that the mini storage | 00:41:11 | |
| units. | 00:41:14 | |
| We've also. This is more of an exaggeration of the maximum amount. | 00:41:20 | |
| 97,000 square feet we don't intend. | 00:41:24 | |
| When building 97,000 square feet, but we did want to show what would fit. | 00:41:27 | |
| On the site plan. | 00:41:32 | |
| You can look for the. | 00:41:33 | |
| Buildings facing West Canaveral Rd. both of those would be in essence privacy fences at least one behind built out of CMU block. | 00:41:36 | |
| We've popped in some vegetation just social landscaping again that would come to the next level during development plan on how | 00:41:42 | |
| much landscaping was required underneath the Floyd County development standards. Also looking just S there's a whole there's an | 00:41:49 | |
| additional line of landscaping but again before the board today it's simply use variance request. | 00:41:56 | |
| The very first element is the special exception will be interest to the public health, safety, morals, general welfare of the | 00:42:05 | |
| community as Mr. Lot property is currently served by three inch water line in the nearest larger line at least 1500 feet away. It | 00:42:10 | |
| states that the Georgetown Fire Department provides the minimum line required to serve the development of this nature to be a six | 00:42:16 | |
| inch line with a hydrant and within 400 feet. | 00:42:22 | |
| A way of the building. | 00:42:29 | |
| If I may approach my hand you all document. | 00:42:33 | |
| Thank you. | 00:42:41 | |
| So if you look at this, this is an aerial map. I was able to get on the. | 00:42:49 | |
| The phone was everything Water Corporation this morning. | 00:42:53 | |
| It's going to be a little bit hard to see and I did the best thing I could, but on the between McDonald's and Red Roof Inn I put a | 00:42:56 | |
| black dot that is the closest 6 inch water line. | 00:43:02 | |
| And then if you look on the West Canable Rd. there is another fire hydrant someone provided by. | 00:43:08 | |
| Reach Waterlogging. | 00:43:13 | |
| So if we're looking at what Mr. Creedy stated, as well as what's positioned by the Georgetown Fire Department. | 00:43:15 | |
| The Derays Barber Shop, The Shell, The Circle K, The Cash Saver, Indiana Land, Clayton Homes in Edwardsville Animal Clinic. | 00:43:21 | |
| None of which are within 400 feet of a six inch line. | 00:43:30 | |
| So we disagree that that is a standard that has to be met. If it is, then all these businesses are in violation of, say, Fire | 00:43:34 | |
| Safety 2014. | 00:43:38 | |
| Also, I've reached out to Sheriff Bush as well as Assistant Chief Scott Lamore. The General Police Department provided those two | 00:43:46 | |
| letters. Letters. | 00:43:50 | |
| It's in your packet. | 00:43:54 | |
| Just questioning whether or not there's any inherent. | 00:43:55 | |
| Crime or public safety issues related to many storage both gentlemen, many, many years, decades experience between the two of | 00:43:59 | |
| them. Both indicate in their letters that many storage units are no different than any other business, and they're not any. | 00:44:06 | |
| More highly successful to crime than, say, a shopping center. | 00:44:14 | |
| Or anything else in the area? | 00:44:17 | |
| So we believe that the special exception, you know, would not be interest to public health safety. | 00:44:21 | |
| And general work of the community. | 00:44:26 | |
| The second prong, the use and value of the area to the property, will not be adversely affected and substantially adverse. | 00:44:29 | |
| Man approach once more. | 00:44:35 | |
| Thank you. | 00:44:52 | |
| So if we can look where the star is, that's that's a subject property. | 00:44:59 | |
| So just beneath the subject property, that's the Edwardsville Animal Clinic, which we know is not a residential use, even though | 00:45:03 | |
| it's zoned as such. Across the street we have Clayton Homes and a candy Corner, and directly across the street we have a | 00:45:07 | |
| multifamily property. | 00:45:11 | |
| After looking at the acreage of the multifamily property and. | 00:45:16 | |
| And looking at consistent development standards in the area at some point A. | 00:45:20 | |
| If it continues to stay be zoned as a multi family, there should be anywhere between 120 and 150 units at some point to be built. | 00:45:25 | |
| So it's important that we understand that this request is not just surrounded by residential, it is between the Interstate and | 00:45:32 | |
| next to three of the four different properties are not. | 00:45:37 | |
| Residential letter surrounding. | 00:45:43 | |
| In order to understand whether or not the use and the value would be disrupted at all. | 00:45:46 | |
| We reached out to Mark Hack and Troy Stiller, both with decades of experience both. | 00:45:53 | |
| Respected. | 00:45:59 | |
| Real estate brokers in the area. | 00:46:01 | |
| I mean, the Greentree Realty I think has 54 agents between the two of them, probably, you know. | 00:46:04 | |
| 10s of millions of dollars a year in transactions. Both have done an aerial review and and have found that they would not | 00:46:09 | |
| adversely affect any of the properties values and surrounding properties. If you look at their letters, they specifically looked | 00:46:14 | |
| at. | 00:46:20 | |
| Store space Self Storage. They're located on State Hwy. 64 and how related to Meadow Oaks and Spring Crest subdivisions. | 00:46:26 | |
| Mr. | 00:46:34 | |
| Hack looked at. | 00:46:36 | |
| Also looked at storage space self storage Also looked at storage stowaway storage. They only Pike and storage rental of America | 00:46:38 | |
| there in New Albany. | 00:46:42 | |
| Indiana. | 00:46:47 | |
| The third prong the need for a special exception, which is. | 00:46:51 | |
| Really, a variance use arises from some condition peculiar to a property. | 00:46:55 | |
| Mr. Creeby states that the property was recently split from the homestead to the north northwest and has remained vacant. The | 00:47:00 | |
| property suitable for residential development consistent with its zoning and current infrastructure, which allows up to four | 00:47:05 | |
| homes. | 00:47:10 | |
| Well, the county I feel right here is they're trying to bootstrap the property owner only building 4 homes on on that area. It's | 00:47:15 | |
| approximately 7 acres. | 00:47:19 | |
| Property owner does have a right to seek a reasonable return on his property, and his or her property is governed by Indiana law. | 00:47:24 | |
| Subject property has many peculiar conditions. | 00:47:28 | |
| It's located next to an Interstate. | 00:47:34 | |
| Which has approximately 53,000 cars a day that go go by create substantial noise and fumes. That's surrounded by other uses other | 00:47:36 | |
| than residential IE multifamily, commercial and animal clinic. There are significant topography issues. | 00:47:42 | |
| Will increase the development costs and there's a lack of water supply as well as those sewers at the lot line. | 00:47:49 | |
| In 465 LLC versus Metropolitan Board of Zoning appeals. | 00:47:57 | |
| The BCA determined that property that is adjacent to Interstate and serves as a buffer between residential neighborhoods and | 00:48:03 | |
| commercial Interstate activity is a peculiarity of property. | 00:48:07 | |
| Also in Bowman, the metro border zoning appeals of Marion. | 00:48:13 | |
| That being 331 NE 2nd 735, stating that the size of acreage, whether it's small or large, can also be a peculiarity. | 00:48:17 | |
| In Metro School District of Washington Township, the. | 00:48:27 | |
| Jansen. | 00:48:30 | |
| That being a 302 NE 2nd 551, the Board was justified in finding a need of the variance arose from a condition procurement | 00:48:31 | |
| property. There was evidence that the unusual shape and relatively small acreage, when viewed in conjunction with adjoining | 00:48:37 | |
| commercial use and railroad tracks made the property in suitable for development as either the apartment complexes or agriculture. | 00:48:43 | |
| Metro Development versus Troy Realty. | 00:48:50 | |
| Affirming the issuance of a variance where evidence indicated the property was situated at a corner of a heavily trafficked | 00:48:53 | |
| intersection, making it more affected by noise and fumes and surrounding area, and was adversely affected by water. | 00:48:59 | |
| And lastly. | 00:49:06 | |
| There's another case here versus Shackleford, affirming a variance where the parcel was located in major major thoroughfare and | 00:49:08 | |
| adjacent to gas station, making the site unsuitable for single family. | 00:49:13 | |
| Issues. | 00:49:20 | |
| #4 the strict application of the terms and zoning ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship. Sorry if we can pause it right | 00:49:24 | |
| there. So the 10 minutes is up. | 00:49:27 | |
| I don't know if you guys want to extend that 5 minutes or whatever, you know, time period or where you want to move forward. | 00:49:32 | |
| A piece on the item 4. I said keep going. Yeah, keep going. | 00:49:40 | |
| Keith Ellen, Thank you, Sir. | 00:49:45 | |
| Mr. Creeby states that the strict application of the terms of zoning warrants will not result in necessary hardship of use. | 00:49:48 | |
| And we disagree with that, as it is a blanket statement that does not even address the right of the property owner to seek a | 00:49:54 | |
| reasonable return. | 00:49:57 | |
| In the case, Board of Zoning Appeals of City of Whiten Lake County versus McFadden, it does state that the determination of the | 00:50:01 | |
| existence of an unnecessary hardship is governed by all relevant factors which, taken together, indicate that property cannot | 00:50:07 | |
| reasonably be put to conforming use because limitations imposed upon it by the ordinance. It must also be shown that the land | 00:50:13 | |
| involved cannot return and yield a reasonable return that's only used for the allowed zoning purposes. | 00:50:20 | |
| Well as of right now stating that it should remain as. | 00:50:27 | |
| Residential and that four. | 00:50:32 | |
| Homes would be enough. | 00:50:34 | |
| And we have a letter from Mr. John Locke. | 00:50:36 | |
| Who has close to a billion dollars in transactions from residential and commercial stating that that would not be a reasonable | 00:50:39 | |
| return, only allowing for four. | 00:50:43 | |
| Residential lots. | 00:50:48 | |
| The determination of the existence as the properties that sits today without having to come before the BCA only has to buy right | 00:50:50 | |
| permitted uses, agriculture, agricultural or Home Farm stands, child cares within the home, a dwelling of a manufactured home, | 00:50:57 | |
| dwelling of single family, detached residential facility and or trails or walking paths. | 00:51:04 | |
| So the relevant facts are peculiar conditions not created specific to this or limited to these. These were not created by the | 00:51:12 | |
| property owner. | 00:51:16 | |
| Saying that they don't abuse residential homes sits next to I64. | 00:51:21 | |
| The surrounding uses are. | 00:51:26 | |
| Other than just residential? | 00:51:28 | |
| There's a substantial amount of follow the property. | 00:51:31 | |
| The property does not have available sewers anywhere close. It's 1500 feet away. We actually sent out for a bid through temple and | 00:51:33 | |
| temple which is in your packet. How much would it cost to bring sewer and water to here to do anything with it? And the, the, the, | 00:51:40 | |
| the cost was between 225,275 thousand. So by the time that you take the cost of bringing infrastructure, the cost of the land each | 00:51:48 | |
| lot itself will probably be 100 to $125,000 per lot. You can use it for four lots. | 00:51:55 | |
| And lastly, we don't believe that the mini storage would really alter. | 00:52:07 | |
| The character of the surrounding area. | 00:52:12 | |
| When you look at how far it's set back, most of the visibilities can be off of the Interstate. | 00:52:14 | |
| And we're going to block majority of it. | 00:52:18 | |
| With. | 00:52:20 | |
| What what I would call walls with the backside made out of masonry brick. | 00:52:22 | |
| It was like a secure privacy fence facing West Canaveral Rd. | 00:52:27 | |
| With an abundance of landscaping, working with the Floyd County. | 00:52:31 | |
| Develop. | 00:52:36 | |
| Now item 5 gets a little bit. | 00:52:39 | |
| Tricky here, and the reason I say that is because use variances are controlled by Indiana code 3674 dash 918.4. | 00:52:43 | |
| And that statute states that the approval does not interfere substantially with the comp plan adopted under the 500 series of this | 00:52:52 | |
| chapter. | 00:52:56 | |
| That's in contradiction to what has been adopted and what's in your petition. Your petition states that the approval of the | 00:53:01 | |
| special exception will contradict the goes or will not contradict the goals of the four county Planning Commission. | 00:53:07 | |
| I know that may not sound like a big deal, but there is a big difference on whether there's something contradicts something or | 00:53:14 | |
| whether or not it interferes substantially. | 00:53:18 | |
| Furthermore, if you move forward underneath and again, you have your own legal counsel. | 00:53:23 | |
| As you move forward underneath element #5 and not the correct statute for you in violation of the doctor involved. Alter berries. | 00:53:28 | |
| I have seven additional pages of how I believe that we are in compliance with a comp plan. | 00:53:37 | |
| They were in our package. | 00:53:44 | |
| Has everybody had an opportunity to? | 00:53:46 | |
| To review, I mean, I'm happy to present and go through. | 00:53:50 | |
| And then the other thing that I did at least want to quickly go over. | 00:53:53 | |
| Is Mr. Creevy? | 00:53:57 | |
| Handed you all. | 00:54:00 | |
| Kind of a print out with this response. | 00:54:04 | |
| And his highlights are in yellow. | 00:54:06 | |
| And So what I did. | 00:54:13 | |
| As I went through. | 00:54:14 | |
| And these are copies of account plan. | 00:54:16 | |
| And what I did is I went through. | 00:54:18 | |
| And I marked in blue everything that we've cited. | 00:54:20 | |
| So we just simply disagree, I guess with the complaint says. | 00:54:23 | |
| So on page 5, everything in blue the development. | 00:54:28 | |
| Redevelopment or change in the use of land with employee county should we consider on the basis basis of its immediate and future | 00:54:31 | |
| impact on the public health, safety, welfare, population density? | 00:54:36 | |
| And whether proposed available furthers the interests of the company, we find that it does. | 00:54:42 | |
| The next one talks about the. | 00:54:47 | |
| Prehensive plan policy shall strive to protect rural character of Floyd County is maintained and preserved through the development | 00:54:49 | |
| of conservation, development design, sustainable ecological design and very important here the promotion of low impact | 00:54:54 | |
| infrastructure choices. | 00:54:58 | |
| Also included in your pack, we retained a traffic engineer. | 00:55:03 | |
| She's presented a letter in your pocket. | 00:55:07 | |
| Mini storage cemeteries and churches are the single lowest impact infrastructures uses that the municipality can have. We feel | 00:55:11 | |
| that we need that and it follows the. | 00:55:16 | |
| Account plan here in Floyd County. | 00:55:22 | |
| Also, on page 5 when you look, it talks about the request for special uses should be measured against the adopted land use | 00:55:24 | |
| policies and objectives in this document. | 00:55:28 | |
| Factors for consideration include the relation of development, redevelopment or change in land use to the following factors. So | 00:55:33 | |
| what I've done if you look on page 5. | 00:55:37 | |
| The 12 small bullet points. | 00:55:42 | |
| We can go through each one and as to why this meets it so a nuisance potential to existing or planned future land uses. Many | 00:55:46 | |
| storage will not create any nuisances In the end of the code defines nuisances as whatever is interest to health and decent | 00:55:52 | |
| offensive to the census and obstruction to the free use of the property. So it's essentially to interfere with the comfortable | 00:55:58 | |
| enjoying the life of property as a nuisance. We don't believe that a mini storage unit is a nuisance. | 00:56:05 | |
| Proximity to existing light use developed. | 00:56:12 | |
| Mr. Creeby already acknowledges in his statements that. | 00:56:16 | |
| Mini storage is a like use development to that of multifamily. Multifamily can be found directly across the street. | 00:56:20 | |
| 3rd population density. | 00:56:28 | |
| We had a private third party neutral perform a market analysis on this site and found there's a need. | 00:56:30 | |
| In the area when comparing the local density as well as increased residential development. | 00:56:35 | |
| There has been an increase in density. There's definitely been an increase in apartments. You have about 400 new apartments coming | 00:56:40 | |
| online as well as new. | 00:56:43 | |
| Residential neighborhoods and this is going to fill a void in a need. | 00:56:48 | |
| You look to the next. | 00:56:52 | |
| Bullet proximity to supporting land uses. The property has Interstate visibility less than a mile off the exit and is adjacent to | 00:56:54 | |
| grocery stores, gas stations, fast food restaurants and animal clinic. A mobile manufactured home sales company is directly across | 00:56:59 | |
| the street from a large vacant tract zone multifamily. | 00:57:04 | |
| The traffic patterns and thoroughfare plan. | 00:57:10 | |
| Many storage is the lowest impact use possible and is substantially less than that of single family home residential development, | 00:57:12 | |
| so traffic patterns will not be affected by this development. | 00:57:17 | |
| Public safety systems, including Fire Protection and law enforcement. | 00:57:23 | |
| Per the letters from Floyd County Sheriff Bush and Assistant Chief JPD Scott McGuire, there are no public safety concerns related | 00:57:26 | |
| to this. | 00:57:29 | |
| Project. Furthermore, non conditioned mini storage units are not required to be sprinkled. It will be beneath the 12,000 square | 00:57:33 | |
| foot threshold that would mandate it. | 00:57:38 | |
| Water and sanitation systems. Many storage units do not require water or sanitation systems. Therefore it will not adversely | 00:57:44 | |
| affect the system. | 00:57:47 | |
| Public school system many stories will not create any new students for the area. That's why I have no impact. | 00:57:52 | |
| Topographic and geological Characteristics The topo and geologic characteristic of the site will have to be studied. Depending on | 00:57:57 | |
| what's beneath, the surface and sign may have to be reduced significantly. | 00:58:02 | |
| The preservation of natural characteristics, including sight lines. | 00:58:08 | |
| In an effort to adhere to the Evertsville gateway intent and this provisions of the comp plan who intentionally set back the mini | 00:58:11 | |
| storage units approximately this was originally 250 feet, but I think we moved it up to maybe like 180 which by code I think the | 00:58:17 | |
| setbacks are maybe 40 feet. So we're. | 00:58:23 | |
| 4/4 times back the minimum threshold. | 00:58:30 | |
| Site drainage. | 00:58:34 | |
| All site drains will meet Floyd County standards. Loss of agricultural use. The property is not currently being utilized for any | 00:58:35 | |
| farming purposes, so no loss will occur. | 00:58:40 | |
| And then it states that if there's any other factor reasonably related to protect health, safety and general welfare of the public | 00:58:44 | |
| or further interest of the comp plan. | 00:58:48 | |
| So these are the. | 00:58:53 | |
| Probably the top 12. | 00:58:55 | |
| Things you need to look at as to whether or not the grand experience and in our opinion we we meet. | 00:58:58 | |
| We are in compliance. | 00:59:04 | |
| And we certainly, if you're looking at state statute, we certainly do not substantially interfere with a comp plan that has been | 00:59:05 | |
| adopted. | 00:59:09 | |
| Also on page 5 I want to talk about the intensity and type of the development. | 00:59:15 | |
| Shall be limited by the ability of the infrastructure proposed and existing to service the new development without materially | 00:59:19 | |
| decreasing the level of service to the existing development or creating safety concerns. The use variance is low intensity and | 00:59:23 | |
| does not require any additional service other than what currently exists and will not materially harm the environment or create | 00:59:28 | |
| safety concern. | 00:59:32 | |
| Engineers report mini storage will not impact the roads in any way since it's such a low trip generator. | 01:00:07 | |
| Also on page 6, development, redevelopment or change in use of land with Floyd County shall preserve the natural characteristics | 01:00:13 | |
| and scenic quality of the land to the greatest extent possible. Instead of attempting to maximize the acreage, we have designed a | 01:00:20 | |
| way to preserve the natural characteristics by agreeing to use masonry products that face the sides that of West Can Eagle just | 01:00:26 | |
| like similar other mini storages in Flint County. | 01:00:32 | |
| Page 23 of the comp plan The second highest preference for the community moving forward was locally owned restaurants, retail and | 01:00:40 | |
| businesses. | 01:00:44 | |
| My family and I live 5 minutes away from this property. We will own it and operate these many storage units. As a locally owned | 01:00:49 | |
| business, this clearly meets the second highest preference in the comp plan. | 01:00:53 | |
| On page 23, although the survey was extremely beneficial. | 01:00:59 | |
| The main challenge will be finding funding solutions that are realistic but also satisfy the residents. | 01:01:03 | |
| Of the community. | 01:01:09 | |
| Also on page 24. | 01:01:11 | |
| In May of 2015, Professor Larry Dior of Purdue University spoke regarding local government finances. | 01:01:13 | |
| In his discussion, he addressed the attributes of land use employee counting key points from the discussion where the fact that | 01:01:20 | |
| Floyd County has one of the lowest property taxes in the state of Indiana and it has smaller than state average of taxing entities | 01:01:27 | |
| and this is important. It has smaller than average amount of commercial and industrial lands available. | 01:01:34 | |
| So. | 01:01:42 | |
| The comp plan kind of identifies also a number for the planners for Planning Commission. The board zoning appeals to | 01:01:43 | |
| commissioners. | 01:01:46 | |
| Because it talks about all these new amenities, but they don't raise taxes or anything important. | 01:01:50 | |
| Well, an idea is that the Highlander Point and Edwardsville Gateway trip which is adjacent to this property. | 01:01:56 | |
| Brings in about $119,000 a year. | 01:02:02 | |
| About 400 properties that exist. | 01:02:05 | |
| That that was the revenue spent last year. | 01:02:07 | |
| It's in the package. | 01:02:10 | |
| This development right here is going to be somewhere in the neighborhood between 4:00 and $5,000,000 if you extend. If you extend | 01:02:11 | |
| the TIF, you can capture probably $40,000 a year. | 01:02:16 | |
| With $140,000 a year you can create grants for local businesses, you can upgrade facades, you can do a lot of things if the other | 01:02:21 | |
| community communities are different. | 01:02:24 | |
| Are you about getting about done? | 01:02:30 | |
| For the next steps. | 01:02:34 | |
| Of the of the 10 guiding principles on page 27, the three paramount principles for Floyd County to meet the state of community | 01:02:36 | |
| values over 3. | 01:02:40 | |
| Preserve open spaces and farmland, strengthen and direct development toward existing communities, and foster distinctive, | 01:02:45 | |
| attractive communities with strong places. | 01:02:48 | |
| Sense. Sense of place. | 01:02:54 | |
| We could have actually maximized this even more. And when we chose not to, to try to keep some level of green space out in front | 01:02:55 | |
| of the detention basin, extended our buffer yards on either side. So we feel like we, we, we need those. | 01:03:02 | |
| I'm not going to belabor the point. I think you will kind of get the ideas I've been. | 01:03:09 | |
| Been up here kind of reading and reciting but I want to make sure to make a record. | 01:03:16 | |
| Clear record At this time I'd like to put into the record exhibits one through. | 01:03:19 | |
| Well, a lot of it's been presented the case law to be other documents that I've presented to. | 01:03:26 | |
| And I don't know if. | 01:03:36 | |
| You have any questions for the engineer or for just an industry, correct? | 01:03:38 | |
| OK. Does the board have any questions? | 01:03:42 | |
| I've got a couple. | 01:03:47 | |
| First, do you already own the land or is this contingent on purchase? This is contingent on if it's approved. We'll we'll close | 01:03:49 | |
| and we. | 01:03:54 | |
| And you mentioned that. | 01:03:59 | |
| The site work would be extensive and the cost would be extensive. If this was developed as residential, how is that any different | 01:04:02 | |
| than? | 01:04:06 | |
| Basically scraping everything off and adding a bunch of parks, gate infrastructure. I don't understand how I'm saying this would | 01:04:11 | |
| be expensive. | 01:04:15 | |
| This doing the site work here because if you look at how the length of the the pads themselves. | 01:04:20 | |
| There's going to be additional site work that need to be had. | 01:04:27 | |
| For a mini storage versus 4 homes. | 01:04:30 | |
| OK. | 01:04:34 | |
| I thought you were making the the argument that this is. | 01:04:36 | |
| Better than the home, so I misunderstood. | 01:04:39 | |
| That's it. That's all I can. | 01:04:47 | |
| One, sorry, one other question, yes Sir. Is there any consideration to why are you going variance versus zoning change because | 01:04:49 | |
| it's a prohibited use. So even if we went into a rezone that wouldn't allow this within the base of zoning, it is in the | 01:04:55 | |
| Edwardsville overlay and in that within your zoning ordinances prohibited using. So you would have to seek A use variance. We | 01:05:01 | |
| actually discussed this Nick and I regardless, even if it was rezoned, it would be back before you all anyways. And so either way | 01:05:06 | |
| it was going to be before this board. | 01:05:12 | |
| OK, thanks. | 01:05:19 | |
| One question that I have is the orientation of the building. With all the slope that's on that property. It seems like the | 01:05:23 | |
| building drop should be rotated 90° in my opinion. | 01:05:28 | |
| I don't disagree with you, but what we were, I don't know how you're gonna have to have retaining walls or something to hold this, | 01:05:34 | |
| to build all those buildings. So what we were trying to do, Sir, is limit. | 01:05:39 | |
| Anything that the rest of the. | 01:05:44 | |
| Surrounding property on the western naval side would see and maybe at the end of the day we come back and rotate them. The most | 01:05:46 | |
| important thing that I, if I were a neighbor is I would want you know. | 01:05:51 | |
| The long lines of which would be essentially a fence of brick. | 01:05:57 | |
| And then what you do on the insides of? | 01:06:01 | |
| I think would be OK depending upon how the site. | 01:06:04 | |
| OK. That was my concern because there's pretty good steep hill there. And how you? | 01:06:07 | |
| I couldn't figure out how you're going to do those unless you've done a lot of dirt, dirt work. There would be a substantial | 01:06:15 | |
| amount of dirt work. And then the other piece to this, remember when I first introduced a cyclone? | 01:06:19 | |
| We don't intend. | 01:06:24 | |
| To maximize and build 90,000 square feet. | 01:06:26 | |
| I mean, our first phase will probably be around 30 to 36,000. | 01:06:29 | |
| And then if it builds out, then we'll maybe move on. | 01:06:32 | |
| Because there is a substantial amount of dirt. | 01:06:36 | |
| To be had. | 01:06:38 | |
| OK. Thank you. Thank you. | 01:06:41 | |
| Is there anyone else here to speak in favor of this? | 01:06:43 | |
| Please come forward, state your name. | 01:06:48 | |
| Yeah, my name is Garrett Dunaway with. | 01:06:57 | |
| Lock commercial real estate. My address is 1190 Wildwood Blue. | 01:07:00 | |
| Northwest Portland, IN 47112. | 01:07:04 | |
| My client, Larry Ragland, hired myself and LOP Real Estate to market and sell the property that's being discussed today along W | 01:07:08 | |
| Kneeball Rd. | 01:07:12 | |
| We first put it on the market late 2022. We garnered a lot of interest in the property and we've been under contract three times. | 01:07:17 | |
| It's falling apart those contracts for various reasons. | 01:07:22 | |
| The first time under contract, the user was looking to use the property for a trucking company, but the county engineer ended up | 01:07:29 | |
| denying this use as the roads weren't wide enough to support semis. | 01:07:35 | |
| Second time under contract, the buyer was looking to use the property as multifamily or assisted living. | 01:07:42 | |
| However. | 01:07:50 | |
| During his due diligence was trying to find out how close the sewers were. I knew they were in the area but we didn't know what | 01:07:52 | |
| the cost would be for that. | 01:07:56 | |
| Ultimately, this buyer, that buyer was, it was too expensive for him. | 01:08:00 | |
| That brings us to the third time under contract. | 01:08:07 | |
| As Jake said, initially looked into multifamily use. | 01:08:10 | |
| Knowing the potential issues with sewer, however, we ran into that next issue of water pressure. As the site currently sits, you | 01:08:14 | |
| can only put about four homes on the property due to the water pressure. | 01:08:20 | |
| Due to the lack of utilities and the infrastructure at this property, it really narrows the uses of the. | 01:08:28 | |
| This this side of the corridor. | 01:08:34 | |
| Has really lacked development and this is an opportunity to develop this side of the corridor that can benefit Georgetown as the. | 01:08:37 | |
| Georgetown community continues to grow. | 01:08:46 | |
| Myself and LOP Real Estate believe that this is the highest and best use for the property. | 01:08:50 | |
| That can benefit the community and it makes sense for the buyer, makes sense for the seller, and it makes sense again for the | 01:08:57 | |
| community as it continues to grow. | 01:09:02 | |
| Thank you. Thank you. | 01:09:07 | |
| There's somebody else there. | 01:09:09 | |
| Please come forward and let's try and make it short as we can. | 01:09:11 | |
| All right, as Garrett, I'm the property owner. I'm Larry Raglan, 1404 Edwardsville, Galena Rd. So I live just 2 1/2 blocks around | 01:09:17 | |
| away from the property. Now the, you know, return on investment. Just a reasonable return. And I'm not going to lie to you, when | 01:09:25 | |
| we when I bought this land and my partner nine years ago, yeah, I wanted to get the biggest bang for my buck and. | 01:09:33 | |
| You know, when again, we went through all those different phases, but what I'm hearing now and being in the community and I drive | 01:09:43 | |
| by this place every day. | 01:09:47 | |
| On my way home. | 01:09:51 | |
| You're looking at. | 01:09:53 | |
| You know, hold on to it, my partner. Let's hold on to it. Eventually developments come in. We can get a Big Bang for our bugs with | 01:09:55 | |
| sewers and water pressure. But when I saw this development by Mr. Elder. | 01:10:02 | |
| You know, I was willing to, you know, go back to just that, you know, reasonable return on investment and drop the and drop the | 01:10:11 | |
| price. | 01:10:15 | |
| I hear all the time it's too crowded, there's too many apartments, the traffic is terrible. | 01:10:20 | |
| This is the best. | 01:10:27 | |
| His development to me, is the best of both worlds. I don't have to hold on to it and wait it out. | 01:10:29 | |
| It's a nice facility. They've done their leg work for sure and. | 01:10:36 | |
| I look at it as a much needed. | 01:10:43 | |
| Uh, structure with low impact traffic and. | 01:10:47 | |
| Trust me, I drive that every day and the traffic is is terrible. So that's my spill. OK, Thank you very much. Is there anyone else | 01:10:51 | |
| speak in favor? | 01:10:56 | |
| OK. If not, need to hear from those opposed. We're going to have time limit. | 01:11:04 | |
| Are you going to reset it there? | 01:11:11 | |
| OK, you want to go for. | 01:11:15 | |
| You stood up first. Come on. | 01:11:17 | |
| State your name. | 01:11:19 | |
| Hold on, Hold on, hold on. Sorry. | 01:11:22 | |
| Say your name to microphone please with your address. | 01:11:28 | |
| My name is Ruth Shamaker. I live on 1412 W Canaveral Rd. My property was the largest piece of property there. I have 20 acres and | 01:11:31 | |
| I am north of what they're wanting to build this on. I reject this proposal in contrary to the existing zoning because it is | 01:11:39 | |
| residential and. | 01:11:47 | |
| Suburban. Whatever it is, anyway, I. | 01:11:56 | |
| I feel like it is very bad on that hill. And then my property, I have a slope, a good slope that's going to be coming from that. | 01:12:00 | |
| And it also the water that comes down goes into my Creek, it goes into my spring, spring there. It flows into the lake that the | 01:12:11 | |
| people are swimming with. And I feel like this is not what is good for us. They talked about the. | 01:12:21 | |
| Truck Well, this is all still going to flow into my property and the people that live below me. It just is not good for them. It's | 01:12:32 | |
| just a rolling hill. | 01:12:37 | |
| And I think it just interferes with. | 01:12:43 | |
| The public use of our property and until someone buys all that property. | 01:12:46 | |
| Below me or whatever. | 01:12:51 | |
| Then they can start seeing what they want to do with it. But I feel like that this should be rejected. It is unhealthy. | 01:12:54 | |
| I don't know what kind of lights they're going to have or anything like that. And. | 01:13:04 | |
| I just. | 01:13:08 | |
| Totally against it. It's just. | 01:13:10 | |
| Something that should not be there. | 01:13:13 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:13:15 | |
| State your name and your address. | 01:13:18 | |
| Rebecca Hernandez 1312 W Knavel I'm opposed to this due to the water. | 01:13:22 | |
| Umm, they say that the drainage is going to be sufficient. There's a lot of drainage right there at Knavel where the water runs | 01:13:29 | |
| off and they start messing with that hill. | 01:13:34 | |
| Is it going to make my basement flood now? Because I mean in that puts. | 01:13:41 | |
| The pond that they plan, is that sufficient to hold the amount of water? | 01:13:46 | |
| That they're going to disrupt on that pervious ground and make it all impervious. You're talking 6 acres and they say they don't | 01:13:52 | |
| intend at this point, but once they get the OK, they can expand it to the full expansion. | 01:13:59 | |
| It affects. | 01:14:08 | |
| Neighbors properties, it affects the lake and there's children that swim there. There's lots of studies on warm storm water. Rain | 01:14:10 | |
| off, run off. | 01:14:15 | |
| I have one from Purdue, one from Penn State if you would like them. I don't have copies for everybody. I have one copy of each. | 01:14:21 | |
| That I you want to submit it to the board and you can do that. | 01:14:30 | |
| If this is approved. | 01:14:43 | |
| I would request. | 01:14:46 | |
| A tree border around the whole perimeter, front and sides. | 01:14:48 | |
| At least 10 feet tall trees. | 01:14:54 | |
| To help with the water. | 01:14:56 | |
| That is a very steep slope. | 01:14:59 | |
| And we don't have any information on what their. | 01:15:03 | |
| They just say it's going to meet Floyd County guidelines. | 01:15:06 | |
| That's very vague. | 01:15:10 | |
| I would like more information on that. | 01:15:14 | |
| How they intend to meet the guidelines for the water that's going to affect all the residents in that community. | 01:15:17 | |
| And across, directly across from where they intend the driveway, the roads very narrow. | 01:15:23 | |
| There is no apartment complex. | 01:15:29 | |
| They're talking future when? | 01:15:31 | |
| 20 years from now, and in the meantime, the community that actually lives there has to. | 01:15:34 | |
| Deal with all the water issues, the lights. How many lights are there going to be all night long? | 01:15:41 | |
| Because it's going to be secure. | 01:15:47 | |
| So that means it has to be lit up. | 01:15:50 | |
| What we don't have any information on this? | 01:15:53 | |
| And it affects and yes, they want to say that there's a business right there, the animal shelter, it operates in a home. | 01:15:58 | |
| Like business front, it's a home front. | 01:16:05 | |
| The only business close to that is the mobile Home Park. | 01:16:09 | |
| Which is not cat is not right across or directly across, it's kind of on the corner. | 01:16:14 | |
| So this would be pushing the business district into our residential community even further. | 01:16:20 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:16:27 | |
| Please come forward and state your name and your address. | 01:16:30 | |
| My name is David Howell. I live at 1506 Pertle Drive. | 01:16:34 | |
| I'm one of the people who live in this little lake that you're speaking about. This lake is home to about 25 homes. It's used | 01:16:39 | |
| extensively through the summer. Kids are swimming in it all the time. If you've been back through that area, you will realize | 01:16:45 | |
| there is a very steep hill from the top his the property that they're Speaking of. It is the high point, the entire area and | 01:16:52 | |
| everything is flowing down that way. | 01:16:58 | |
| We're concerned about keeping the lake clean because we do maintain it. We put money every year for fish, for algae control. We | 01:17:05 | |
| truly take care of the land. It's also a good source for the wildlife. | 01:17:12 | |
| So Bert file in particular. | 01:17:20 | |
| But our biggest concern is. | 01:17:22 | |
| Keep the light clean. Also there is a very low point right at the front of the lake where if we do get extensive amount of water | 01:17:25 | |
| coming down that hill it could possibly flood the road making it impossible. It's one lane Rd. back to another community. More or | 01:17:31 | |
| less small community with that. | 01:17:36 | |
| Keep them blocked off. | 01:17:43 | |
| Also, if there is an extensive water drainage down that hill flooding the lake, it could damage the dam which we. | 01:17:45 | |
| The overall thing is. | 01:17:52 | |
| We're concerned about. | 01:17:55 | |
| What a runoff. | 01:17:57 | |
| And I do have some topical graphical maps showing how the high point is on their property and how it all kind of slopes down that | 01:17:58 | |
| way if you'd like to see it if you wish to submit that to the board. | 01:18:03 | |
| Thank you. I'll keep on to the board. Thank you. | 01:18:16 | |
| Thank you, Sir. OK. Thank you very much. | 01:18:19 | |
| OK. Is there anyone else? | 01:18:24 | |
| State your name and your address please. | 01:18:28 | |
| I'm Darlene Rush. I live at 1531 Lakeland Drive and I just want to follow up on what. | 01:18:30 | |
| David said that to clarify where that high point is of the. | 01:18:37 | |
| Mini shed proposed down to the lake that W Willis Rd. is the only exit. | 01:18:45 | |
| Entry and exit to those dead end streets, Lakeland Dr. Lake Rd. Allen Drive in the back part of Wells Rd. Those are all no outlet | 01:18:52 | |
| Denton streets. So you wouldn't be able to get dinner out you and mill get ambulance services back there. So I request the | 01:18:59 | |
| environmental study to make sure we're not going to have flooding back there and then also right there in front of where they're | 01:19:06 | |
| proposing on West can able that floods a lot when it rains anyway. So again, what just following up on what the other. | 01:19:14 | |
| Said that all that asphalt is going to cause a lot of runoff to all the lower points unless can able. | 01:19:21 | |
| Possibly back in West Willis, possibly into the lake and what David said about containing lake, which has been very clean, we | 01:19:31 | |
| tested every year. | 01:19:35 | |
| Cleaner than most of the drinking water from what the biologist tells us and and then the day. I'm just reiterating that that | 01:19:39 | |
| we're unsure of how much water would go into there and possibly cause the problem. | 01:19:47 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:19:55 | |
| Is there anybody else has anything any different? | 01:19:57 | |
| OK. If not, we're going to close that portion. | 01:20:00 | |
| And if you want to come up and. | 01:20:04 | |
| Address what they were talking about. | 01:20:08 | |
| Yes, thank you. | 01:20:11 | |
| All very reasonable concerns. | 01:20:13 | |
| And, you know, this isn't our first development. And, you know, lights, drainage and water runoff. | 01:20:16 | |
| There, I mean, that's every development. | 01:20:24 | |
| So Floyd County does have standards that we have to file. | 01:20:26 | |
| You know we're not going to have lights bleeding off the property. | 01:20:29 | |
| It is going to be a secure 24/7, gated up front, limited access in the evening. | 01:20:32 | |
| And so no whites would be able to be bled off. We want to keep everything on site, probably at the end of the building's, not | 01:20:38 | |
| anything facing the road. | 01:20:42 | |
| Also with the drainage there is Floyd County drainage walls are actually more stringent. | 01:20:47 | |
| In a while, you know for good reason and any development we do will be a pre and post runoff that we're going to have to meet. | 01:20:53 | |
| We've already retained Heritage Engineering, who's one of the top engineering firms in the area, and they would be able to work | 01:21:00 | |
| with the county to make sure the plans met. | 01:21:05 | |
| The standards. | 01:21:10 | |
| And in regards to the lake, with being on the other side, that would be something that would be taken into consideration. | 01:21:11 | |
| During the drainage plans to see what, if any, water runoff would get there, again, we would have to meet. | 01:21:17 | |
| All of the approved and. | 01:21:23 | |
| And all the requirements are acceptable. | 01:21:26 | |
| That helps answer some of those questions. | 01:21:29 | |
| Any other questions? The so the retention pond is there was there any? | 01:21:34 | |
| Calculations into your estimate here. Is that just a place also? | 01:21:38 | |
| This is more of just is the use approved? If it is, then we move forward and have a development plan approval. We're going to have | 01:21:43 | |
| to go meet, you know, might even be back either before the planning commissioner working with Mr. Creed to make sure that | 01:21:47 | |
| everything is met. | 01:21:52 | |
| You know, we'll submit our plans, we'll send them out to their third party engineers, we'll have comments, they'll get it back to | 01:21:58 | |
| make sure that everything's taken care of. | 01:22:01 | |
| OK. | 01:22:07 | |
| I just clarify that state your name and Justin Anderson crap. | 01:22:12 | |
| 126 W Spring Street. I was just saying we're not requesting a variance for drainage. And as you know, the drainage ordinance is | 01:22:18 | |
| the post runoff is likely to be less with your drainage ordinance. | 01:22:23 | |
| So that's not really before the board of. | 01:22:29 | |
| We're intend to comply with that. | 01:22:32 | |
| OK. Thank you very much. | 01:22:34 | |
| And once again, I'm going to state we do not have a full board. | 01:22:38 | |
| And it takes three to pass, and if it would happen to fail, it would be a year before you can come back again. | 01:22:42 | |
| You want to move forward. | 01:22:56 | |
| Does the board have a ballot? | 01:22:58 | |
| BJP. | 01:23:06 | |
| Don, could you come up to the mic please? | 01:23:37 | |
| The. | 01:23:48 | |
| We've listened to a lot of arguments here tonight. | 01:23:51 | |
| And when I'm preparing my ballot here. | 01:23:54 | |
| My probably my biggest thing is the fact that this is in the gate, the Edwardsville Gateway District. | 01:23:58 | |
| And that makes us totally different. | 01:24:05 | |
| Even though we say all this stuff in the comprehensive plan about maintaining rule, this, that and the other the comprehensive. | 01:24:09 | |
| The Gateway District has a very different set of standards to it in my opinion. | 01:24:15 | |
| It does and I am. I guess I want to feel confident. | 01:24:20 | |
| That saying this is in that gateway district. | 01:24:24 | |
| And it leads. | 01:24:28 | |
| It doesn't meet our standards for the Gateway District. | 01:24:31 | |
| With your office supports that. | 01:24:35 | |
| I can give you a little bit of background, OK, a little bit of background with 2011, 2000. It was 2011 that the county conducted | 01:24:38 | |
| the Gateway District plan. | 01:24:44 | |
| That included three sections for that, for that gateway, that included the Town Center section, which this property is located | 01:24:51 | |
| adjacent to, included the campus component, which is the Noble Park campus. And what were the average of schools considered? I | 01:24:58 | |
| think the Old Town a component of it. | 01:25:05 | |
| The rationale behind that was that to create distinct. | 01:25:12 | |
| Gateways into the community. There's only two that the county has control from planning. One is the one is a Highlander Point area | 01:25:18 | |
| right after the Greenville exit and this exit off the Edwards. | 01:25:23 | |
| And Georgia? | 01:25:29 | |
| So the underlying plan was to create a commercial area that had mixed uses that had a Town Center type of approach was. | 01:25:31 | |
| Was the rationale. So it had some distinct and it was a distinct. | 01:25:44 | |
| Area. | 01:25:48 | |
| Why they had? | 01:25:50 | |
| Sub sub plan for that area. | 01:25:53 | |
| So do you believe that this would substantially interfere with that plan for the gateway village that the county has? | 01:25:56 | |
| At the time, the county planner at that plan, yes. | 01:26:05 | |
| Thank you. | 01:26:11 | |
| OK. | 01:26:14 | |
| You have a ballot. I have a ballot. | 01:26:15 | |
| He wants to come back up. | 01:26:21 | |
| It's it's closed. | 01:26:24 | |
| So I get to ask. | 01:26:27 | |
| It's I don't, yeah. You guys can't allow him to state something. If he wants to state something, he doesn't get to the staff. | 01:26:30 | |
| I would think so, since there was a statement. What did you say? I would think we should allow this. | 01:26:40 | |
| Just a couple minutes, OK, It's going to be real quick. So this is actually a good conversation that I had with Mr. Creeby. I know | 01:26:49 | |
| you won't have that benefit and you were probably responsible for this being adopted, Mr. Loud, but. | 01:26:54 | |
| The gateway itself, I do find interesting this property when he talks about the three different areas, this property isn't even in | 01:27:00 | |
| that area. So the Town Center this is adjacent to, it's not in the Town Center. I will agree with you there. | 01:27:08 | |
| In this what happened with the gateway is then they came through and just made a big circle around the three different just to say | 01:27:15 | |
| hey. | 01:27:20 | |
| I think I can address that question. | 01:27:25 | |
| Gateway was part of the original 2006 Sony. It wasn't. It wasn't an addition to the 2011. So that Gateway District was created in | 01:27:27 | |
| 2006 and then the. | 01:27:33 | |
| In MSK, MSKS or M I'm sorry came back with the plan for that. | 01:27:40 | |
| But the overlay district. | 01:27:47 | |
| Great as part of the original changes of life in 2011. | 01:27:49 | |
| My last comment is I think this would be a good catalyst. | 01:27:56 | |
| Again, I've lived off the exit. There's been zero significant development in that entire corridor for well over a decade going | 01:27:59 | |
| from 64 to West W Conangle Rd. The free market should dictate within reason and what is allowed. You know, if you look at the | 01:28:07 | |
| plan, while I love the plan, it looks like it's calling Indiana. We're not Carmel, IN. I live here and you know, we continue to | 01:28:14 | |
| just rely on the studies that we pay for. And I would like for anybody to look and say what significant development has been been. | 01:28:22 | |
| From 62 through W Kneeble Rd. in that Town Center area. But I'll leave with that. Thank you all so much. Thank you. OK. Mr. | 01:28:29 | |
| FC-1124-48, Petitioner Elder Company, LLC. | 01:28:37 | |
| After careful review, the Board finds that number one, the special exception, will be injurious to the public health, safety, | 01:28:45 | |
| morals and general welfare of the community because the property is currently served by a three inch water line with near the | 01:28:50 | |
| nearest line at least 1500 feet away. | 01:28:55 | |
| Georgetown Fire Department provides minimum land requirement. | 01:29:00 | |
| To serve the development of this nature, to be 6 inch line with a hydrant within 400 feet of the building. | 01:29:04 | |
| #2 The use and the value of the area adjacent of the property, subject to the special exception, will not be affected in | 01:29:11 | |
| substantial adverse manner. Because the proposed use is relatively low impact with low traffic generation, it will not generate | 01:29:17 | |
| nuisance, noise or smells and will be required to meet stormwater standards. Storage is a reasonable use with proximity to multi | 01:29:24 | |
| family zone property and would be located next to an existing general commercial property. | 01:29:30 | |
| #3 The need for the special exception does not arise from some condition procure you to the property involved. | 01:29:37 | |
| Property was recently split from the homestead to to the northwest and has since remained vacant. The property is suitable for | 01:29:43 | |
| residential development consistent with the zoning and with current infrastructure. | 01:29:49 | |
| Allows up to four homes to be located on property #4 the strip application, the terms of Floyd County zoning ordinance. | 01:29:56 | |
| Will not result in unnecessary hardship in the use of the property because the property is currently suitable for single family | 01:30:05 | |
| development and a joint single family developments. | 01:30:10 | |
| #5 The approval of the special exception will interfere substantially with the Floyd County Comprehensive Plan. | 01:30:16 | |
| Because the proposed use is expressly prohibited in the FCCO for Floyd County Gateway Overlay District, the use does not fit into | 01:30:22 | |
| the planning. | 01:30:27 | |
| Documents for the area and is and is inconsistent with the district. Intense. The intent the use is low is a low intensity and low | 01:30:32 | |
| traffic use. This is a gateway district and adjacent to the Town Center. Concept identified economic growth areas. The use would | 01:30:38 | |
| not create significant active economic activity desired in a growth area. Aesthetically, the use would not be consistent with the | 01:30:45 | |
| existing planning guidelines. | 01:30:52 | |
| The use presents characteristics more consistent with industrial warehousing than aesthetic rule. Neighborhoods orientated | 01:30:59 | |
| commercial with multi large structures, low traffic volumes, security fence and limited landscaping and metal facades. The | 01:31:07 | |
| property also lacks necessary infrastructure for Fire Protection, water service. | 01:31:14 | |
| The Board of Zoning Appeal hereby denies the petitioner special exception that the meeting held on the 9th day of December, 2024 | 01:31:22 | |
| that completes my ballot. | 01:31:26 | |
| OK, you heard the ballot. Is there a second? | 01:31:31 | |
| I'll second. | 01:31:35 | |
| OK. It's been moved in second. | 01:31:37 | |
| All in favor signify by saying aye, aye opposed same sign. | 01:31:40 | |
| It's been denied. | 01:31:45 | |
| Thank you. | 01:31:47 | |
| So on these, I guess these are all moot. We don't do anything with the next. | 01:31:49 | |
| I assume you're willing you're wanting to withdraw those at this point in time. I would love to table them. | 01:31:56 | |
| I'm sorry, I would love to table them. | 01:32:00 | |
| Indefinitely until it's read. | 01:32:03 | |
| I don't know if we can table them indefinitely. | 01:32:06 | |
| So I'll move to the drill. | 01:32:09 | |
| OK. OK. Thank you very much. Has moved to withdraw items. | 01:32:11 | |
| Just for clarification, 4 through 7, is that correct, Mr. Elder? | 01:32:15 | |
| Question. | 01:32:20 | |
| If for some reason we're back here within the year, we have to repay our fees. | 01:32:21 | |
| For those who've been on the standard variances or is it just a simple, I will leave that to staff to answer that for you, Mr. | 01:32:26 | |
| So. | 01:32:38 | |
| What? Why don't we do this? Why don't we table it for this month since Nick's not here and next month Nick can answer that | 01:32:39 | |
| question for us. OK, Thank you all so much. So if you guys can move to just table those pursuant to the applicants requested to | 01:32:45 | |
| your motion to table, I make a motion to table 4 through the remaining 4 through 7. I'll second. | 01:32:51 | |
| OK, the motion has been made. All in favor. Second five to say aye, aye. Opposed. Same sign. Thank you. We can let Mr. Unruh come | 01:32:57 | |
| in. | 01:33:02 | |
| I guess we just need a motion to adjourn. | 01:33:12 | |
| Say there's no more, isn't the 4th floor? | 01:33:24 | |
| OK, thank you. Cheers now. Alrighty. | 01:33:30 | |
| So we're down to, we've finished through seven, they tabled 4 through 7. So you're just down to whether there's any more business | 01:33:33 | |
| by the staff. | 01:33:37 | |
| Don, anything else from the staff that we need to go over tonight? | 01:33:43 | |
| If that's the case, I ask for a motion to adjourn. I'll make a motion. I'll second it. Motion is second. All in favor signify aye | 01:33:47 | |
| aye. Those opposed likewise. Thanks guys. Do you have a copy? | 01:33:53 | |
| Gabrielle. | 01:34:01 | |
| Any of this I have no. | 01:34:03 | |
| The minutes we need those signed as well. Do you have a copy in your packet by chance? | 01:34:07 | |
| Yeah, I'm, I'm looking. | 01:34:13 | |
| You got that one. | 01:34:16 | |
| You got that? | 01:34:19 | |
| That one these blue. | 01:34:24 | |
| You get the Yeah, I have that one. | 01:34:29 | |
| I think that's it. | 01:34:31 | |
| I think that might be. | 01:34:36 |