No Bookmarks Exist.
Point of session of the Floyd County Commissioners and Council together, if you will, please silence your cell phones and stand to | 00:00:00 | |
join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. | 00:00:04 | |
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, | 00:00:10 | |
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. We have one posted agenda item. I do have one special agenda item for the | 00:00:16 | |
commissioners that I'd like to take care of here at the beginning of this. It's unrelated to EMS. It's a carryover from our last | 00:00:23 | |
meeting with regards to the Southern Indiana transit system. If I can get a unanimous vote from the commissioners to add this to | 00:00:29 | |
our agenda. | 00:00:36 | |
So moved. | 00:00:43 | |
All in favor, aye, All right. And that is a carryover from our last meeting, which was resolution number for 2025 for ongoing | 00:00:44 | |
funding. | 00:00:49 | |
I'd like to get a motion to approve. | 00:00:56 | |
I get second on that. | 00:00:59 | |
I'll second that. All in favor. Aye? Aye. All opposed, Aye. | 00:01:02 | |
OK. So we have passage on that with two in favor and one opposed. And if you'd like to hang out until after the meeting, we can | 00:01:07 | |
get signatures for you on that. | 00:01:11 | |
All right. Thank you. Meeting to moving to the matter at hand with regards to EMS. | 00:01:16 | |
I'd like to just briefly start where we ended off, just to see if you had any headway on any of the funding mechanisms that we had | 00:01:23 | |
discussed previously. | 00:01:27 | |
I believe we did, but we do have two resolutions moving to the legacy foundation and also a letter of request that is in the works | 00:01:33 | |
on that. Does anyone want to summarize where we are on that? | 00:01:39 | |
Either the resolutions for funding or the letter on the. | 00:01:47 | |
Legacy foundation. | 00:01:51 | |
The resolutions have been drawn up. They're available. | 00:01:53 | |
Denise, were you in touch with the foundation? I have drawn up a letter requesting that the Legacy Foundation. | 00:01:59 | |
Look at giving us $500,000 of the 5% spend rate for 2024. And I can read that. I can also send it out. I wasn't ready to send it | 00:02:11 | |
out yet because I was waiting. | 00:02:19 | |
For Steve Barks to. | 00:02:27 | |
To verify some of the numbers, I think they're very directional. Is that fair to say, Steve? | 00:02:30 | |
And so I can read this, I can send it out. | 00:02:38 | |
If you don't mind, I'd like to read it if that's OK. | 00:02:42 | |
This is to the Floyd County Legacy Foundation Board. Dear Board members, 'cause I as I am sure most of you are aware, Floyd County | 00:02:48 | |
is currently addressing the situation with our current EMS provider. The contract for New Chapel expires on May 31st, 2024. The | 00:02:56 | |
cost to put a new plan in place. | 00:03:03 | |
To provide EMS service for all Floyd County. | 00:03:13 | |
Minus the city is substantially higher than has been paid in the past. The council and the commissioners would like to request | 00:03:17 | |
$500,000 from the 2024 spend rate, which is approximately 850,000. I think it's a little more than that, Steve, now that we've | 00:03:25 | |
looked at the numbers more closely, but I said approximately to support the unanticipated EMS expense for 2024. This would then | 00:03:32 | |
leave the commissioners and councils time to address. | 00:03:40 | |
A sustainable revenue source for the future. This would also leave the Floyd County Legacy Foundation with approximately 350,000 | 00:03:48 | |
to grant out to worthy, worthy applicants for 2024. | 00:03:55 | |
It might again, maybe a little bit more than that. The principal was a little bit more than I calculated. These numbers aren't. | 00:04:03 | |
We realize that this is highly unusual, a highly unusual request, and that you are currently in in the middle of your grant cycle, | 00:04:11 | |
but these funds would be go a long way to helping the county in an effort to cover the cost of EMS in 2024. | 00:04:19 | |
We do not want this to be an ongoing request, just a one time distribution of the spin rate only. | 00:04:29 | |
We realized the foundation was established to grant worthy applicants in Floyd County to make our county a better place to live, | 00:04:37 | |
work and play and was not meant to cover ongoing operating expenses in Floyd County. We appreciate your consideration to this | 00:04:44 | |
request and would appreciate if you would let us know your ability to grant this request by May 31st and I have left room for all | 00:04:52 | |
of us to sign this. | 00:04:59 | |
Or whoever is in agreement that this that we should move forward with this request from the legacy foundation. So that's what I | 00:05:07 | |
have in hand and I did talk with. | 00:05:14 | |
With Steve about it, so in verifying those, you feel like the numbers are perhaps in excess of that, yes to what, to what amount. | 00:05:23 | |
I did it based on 17,000,000 and the actual balance at this point is 17.8 million. | 00:05:30 | |
890 is what he said. | 00:05:40 | |
Yes. So you're right. Yes. So we would still request the 500 and they would have about 390,000 to give out instead of instead of | 00:05:45 | |
my letter of approximately 350. | 00:05:52 | |
So close. close to 400,000 to the grand out still. | 00:06:00 | |
So Steve, when is the next meeting of the Legacy Foundation? | 00:06:05 | |
We're waiting on for the Matrix come back from the. | 00:06:09 | |
From the Community Foundation to determine what the scale was. So you may. | 00:06:14 | |
I would shoot the middle of May. | 00:06:22 | |
But the request, as you know AL is around 900,000. | 00:06:25 | |
This year. | 00:06:30 | |
So that means that we have to go back. | 00:06:33 | |
We look at all that in our meeting as to what amount we give each organization. | 00:06:36 | |
Yeah, we're, yeah or you could just, we could just reduce by a certain percentage based upon what we what we have to give. But I'm | 00:06:43 | |
sure that we discussed on that. I'm going to suggest that based upon the outcome of of tonight's meeting wherever we go with that | 00:06:51 | |
that maybe we ask for a special meeting on that just to address this question. | 00:06:58 | |
I mean, Dale's also a member of that. Would you be opposed to that special meeting of the legacy foundation board? | 00:07:06 | |
I generally don't like it. | 00:07:13 | |
Just because I think it's setting a bad precedent. | 00:07:15 | |
That was as Denise. | 00:07:19 | |
Help in a resolution it was a certain intent was for that legacy foundation to be and now we're setting a precedent and my fear is | 00:07:21 | |
going forward it's going to be an ongoing thing year after year which was never the intent of the legacy. So I'm generally not in | 00:07:30 | |
favor I'm not saying I would noted but would you be opposed to moving and having a special meeting to discuss that with that. | 00:07:38 | |
So perhaps again depending on how we proceed. | 00:07:48 | |
OK. | 00:07:54 | |
Anything further on funding sources? | 00:07:55 | |
Well known or unknown well we do have the less less the rest of the contract. | 00:08:00 | |
That was budgeted 280, well, I think was budgeted 222-2220. So that's about $120,000 that could be applied seven months and should | 00:08:06 | |
be applied. And then we have river vote. Of course we have the what, the remnant of what? We don't know what the total number is | 00:08:12 | |
of Lois is going to return. | 00:08:19 | |
To the general fund that she. | 00:08:26 | |
That we addressed a couple meetings ago. Some of that gets about 150. I think I saw this interest walk in. I don't know if you | 00:08:30 | |
have any update numbers on. | 00:08:34 | |
And it was $368,000 total. | 00:08:40 | |
Should we have any idea what remains of that? | 00:08:46 | |
About 160 my calculation because. | 00:08:50 | |
Appropriated 190 for the sheriff for his project. | 00:08:53 | |
So that'd be about 160 left. | 00:09:00 | |
And again, those funds would not just be for. | 00:09:02 | |
The remainder of this year, but also might carry over to next year perhaps. | 00:09:06 | |
Or not? Is that a one time thing, Lois? | 00:09:11 | |
I mean, not not hers, but I'm talking about the money that you're adding up. With regards to that'd be 100 and change leftover | 00:09:14 | |
from the duration of this year's contract. | 00:09:19 | |
From Lois Riverboat, I don't know. | 00:09:25 | |
So that be I'm talking about the seven month period that that's at hand. Understood Cousin. | 00:09:28 | |
I think we're pretty much in agreement that we're going to have to. | 00:09:34 | |
Impose some kind of a EMS tax. | 00:09:38 | |
I think in order to sustain this whole EMS thing going forward. | 00:09:42 | |
So that's going to be a. | 00:09:46 | |
The pressing matter is getting funded through December 1, right? | 00:09:48 | |
And I think the if there is a. | 00:09:54 | |
EMS Lit. I think they're obviously that's going to be a very lengthy discussion with a lot of public input. | 00:09:57 | |
And we got about, does that have to be, I think it has to be done by October 31 in order to get the revenue for next year I think. | 00:10:02 | |
And I think part of that discussion needs to have a sunset built into that. | 00:10:11 | |
Depending on what the, depending on what how we go forward, but again just so if we don't come to terms on how we're going to | 00:10:16 | |
provide EMS long term that that would also sunset. | 00:10:22 | |
Over 500,000 that's 780 now and it's 780 you want for duration this year depends on on what route we go. | 00:10:34 | |
According to the the compromise that we're going to talk about tonight, the remaining seven months would be 546,581 June through | 00:10:44 | |
December. | 00:10:48 | |
So we're real close to that. | 00:10:54 | |
The funds available. | 00:10:56 | |
Do you agree, Jim? | 00:10:58 | |
I want to go ahead and make a motion. | 00:11:00 | |
I want to make a motion that the Council respect the authority of the Commissioners and, at the suggestion of the EMS Board, that | 00:11:06 | |
we approve funding for option one. | 00:11:11 | |
To be paid for 2024. | 00:11:17 | |
Via Riverboat 125 the recorders additional funds, which should be 126. | 00:11:21 | |
The current EMS budget, what's left should be 128,000. | 00:11:28 | |
That would leave 442 ask. | 00:11:33 | |
Of the. | 00:11:36 | |
Legacy foundation. | 00:11:38 | |
And then rainy day 74419 for the total of eight 95419 for the remainder of this year with discussion. | 00:11:40 | |
Along with the commissioners regarding broadband money and continued legacy funds for 2025 and 2026 plus other. | 00:11:51 | |
Grant monies and things like that that may be coming in to us. | 00:12:00 | |
Opioid funds, we might be getting some of those. | 00:12:03 | |
2nd. | 00:12:08 | |
Get your warehouse pain. | 00:12:15 | |
She made the motion. That's that's us. | 00:12:20 | |
Discussion on that, Yes, absolutely. | 00:12:23 | |
Doesn't look like that's the option that we were. | 00:12:30 | |
Coming into this meeting, expect an option 6. Going back to option one, I'm not really particularly fond of option one because it | 00:12:33 | |
totally eliminates Hollander Fire District in any kind of service. | 00:12:39 | |
So I'm not. I'm not in favor of that. | 00:12:47 | |
I tend to agree that the Commissioners came up with. | 00:12:54 | |
Option one, what? Three months ago? Two months ago? | 00:12:57 | |
And so therefore I would. | 00:13:01 | |
Be with Connie at that. It's a it's what the commissioners ask. It's our job to fund what they requested. | 00:13:06 | |
And. | 00:13:13 | |
So. | 00:13:17 | |
There we are. | 00:13:18 | |
There was just a lot in that motion. | 00:13:24 | |
Would you like to restate it? Yeah, if you would, Please. Absolutely. | 00:13:28 | |
Just the numbers or the whole thing? | 00:13:33 | |
I get the part about option one, that there was some other things that you listed there for some other funding sources that I | 00:13:37 | |
didn't. | 00:13:40 | |
I didn't care for 2024 riverboat funding should be 125,000 recorders. Additional funds, 126,000 should be left in there after we | 00:13:44 | |
paid the sheriff's. | 00:13:51 | |
The current EMS budget should be 128,000 left in that. | 00:13:59 | |
That would leave the ask of the legacy balance 442,000. | 00:14:05 | |
And then that would leave rainy day. We could use 74,419 for a total of 895 for 19. | 00:14:11 | |
What was that rainy day again? I'm sorry I missed it. | 00:14:19 | |
74419 Thank you. | 00:14:21 | |
Is there any further discussion or questions on on that motion? | 00:14:38 | |
Seeing none all in favor, say aye, Aye. | 00:14:44 | |
Any opposed? Can we show hands? | 00:14:47 | |
Show of hands for opposed, Tommy, what are you doing? | 00:14:50 | |
That motion fails. | 00:14:53 | |
I'll make a second motion. | 00:14:59 | |
That the Council respect the authority of the Commissioners and approve funding for option 2, which again is not enough | 00:15:01 | |
ambulances, but. | 00:15:04 | |
The total is 546,581 funding to come from Riverboat 125 recorders. | 00:15:09 | |
Balance of 126,000. | 00:15:18 | |
The current EMS budget. | 00:15:21 | |
128. | 00:15:24 | |
1000 that would put the legacy balance 75. | 00:15:27 | |
1581. | 00:15:34 | |
And. | 00:15:37 | |
Rainy day would be. | 00:15:44 | |
What, 16,000? | 00:15:54 | |
91,092 thousand. | 00:15:59 | |
2nd. | 00:16:02 | |
Have motion a second? Any discussion on option 2? | 00:16:03 | |
All in favor of show of hands. | 00:16:11 | |
Opposed. | 00:16:14 | |
Motion fails. | 00:16:15 | |
Can we get to the discussion of option 6? | 00:16:18 | |
I would also like to present to. | 00:16:23 | |
Resolutions. | 00:16:27 | |
To be identical to the Highlander resolution in 2023. | 00:16:30 | |
One for Georgetown Township at 500,000 and the second one to New Omni Township Fire District for 500,000 so that they can purchase | 00:16:34 | |
2 ambulances as well to get them equal to Highlander at this point. | 00:16:41 | |
2nd that motion. | 00:16:53 | |
Any discussion on that? | 00:16:56 | |
That money to come from CARES ACT money. | 00:16:57 | |
Because that's where Highlanders came from. | 00:17:00 | |
Seeing no discussion. | 00:17:09 | |
I know I'm not part of the vote on this. | 00:17:12 | |
It's two separate resolutions, one for Georgetown Montreal. | 00:17:15 | |
Amounts of $500,000 each. Purchase of maintenances for their. | 00:17:21 | |
For their districts. | 00:17:27 | |
I think Brad had something. | 00:17:30 | |
Did they? | 00:17:33 | |
So this is the purchase analysis for those two fire districts, is that right? | 00:17:36 | |
Yes. | 00:17:40 | |
Did they ask for analysis to be purchased for them? | 00:17:41 | |
No. But at last week's meeting, we said that we were going to get the Fire Districts up to an equal playing field, and in order to | 00:17:45 | |
do that, with Highlander having two ambulances, Georgetown should get 2. | 00:17:51 | |
As should New Omni Township. | 00:17:58 | |
Do they have currently have any amuses? | 00:18:00 | |
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. | 00:18:03 | |
It takes a little while to get everybody up to speed and get those ambulances in. | 00:18:06 | |
But do they currently have any ambulances? | 00:18:09 | |
Again, not sure what that has to do with anything. | 00:18:12 | |
So do you know the answer to it? | 00:18:16 | |
I'm gonna say no. | 00:18:18 | |
Have they budgeted for any illnesses in the past? | 00:18:22 | |
They wouldn't need to because they weren't doing it, but if we're going to get everybody on the same playing field. | 00:18:28 | |
That's discussion to happen. So they have any transport numbers. | 00:18:34 | |
Come again? Do they have any transport numbers? | 00:18:38 | |
What do you mean? Do they have transport numbers? They don't even have ambulances yet. | 00:18:41 | |
But they will so that we can get them equal to higher. | 00:18:46 | |
Fire district. You know what level certification they have regarding being able to do EMS? OK, this I'm going to. By the time | 00:18:49 | |
they're purchased, they'll be up to par with Highlander. | 00:18:54 | |
We're gonna get them all equal. I have questions. I'm not sure why you're stopping the discussion. | 00:19:01 | |
Because are we going to talk about Highlanders certification level and where they're at and did they budget frameless? | 00:19:07 | |
I'm here for options. Would you like to vote on this or do you want to You want to keep talking about it? | 00:19:16 | |
If you've got some more discussion points, go right ahead. | 00:19:24 | |
I have questions but it don't seem to be either a any answers to them or obviously be you guys don't want to talk about it. | 00:19:27 | |
We'll talk about it. Go ahead with your questions. | 00:19:34 | |
It's OK to talk about it now and ask questions. | 00:19:37 | |
I have no further questions right now. | 00:19:43 | |
I was curious though. I think you're saying $500,000 each, but I think the. | 00:19:45 | |
When it was approved before it was 250 for Greenville, 250 for Lafayette, is that correct? I think that was right. So wouldn't it | 00:19:50 | |
be 250? | 00:19:54 | |
For New Albany, 250 for Georgetown, if we were going to propose such a thing, well, I thought about that. However, when they | 00:19:59 | |
merged, technically now they have 500,000 and two ambulances. | 00:20:05 | |
It's 2 districts. I mean, it's two townships though, that they're covering, not just one. | 00:20:12 | |
Probably not ready yet and and Georgetown we need to hear from them and I think that's in a I'm going to call it a 15 step process | 00:20:48 | |
here that's probably step you know five or six or eight we need, we're still at 1:00. So I think we need to get past one and work | 00:20:55 | |
into that for sure. But doing that right now I think is is. | 00:21:01 | |
Not about the appropriate course of action. | 00:21:09 | |
I'll just add to that. I think it was laid out very. | 00:21:14 | |
Clearly in option six that Al sent out that. | 00:21:19 | |
For the next seven months that we would be looking at how we are going to move forward and at that time I'm not opposed to looking | 00:21:24 | |
at that option if that is what the task force says that that's how we're going to move forward with with with providing ambulance | 00:21:31 | |
service in our county, but. | 00:21:38 | |
That that's, I think you took that way literally and doing that just immediately, that's something we need to be looking at on on | 00:21:46 | |
in the future, but not tonight. My concern is how long does it take to. | 00:21:53 | |
Get a contract to order ambulances and even have them delivered. That's a long time so to get them up to par. | 00:22:02 | |
It's going to take a while to do that. | 00:22:11 | |
But that needs to be part of the discussion. | 00:22:14 | |
And it needs to start sooner than later. We've been talking about EMS forever. That's why I'm throwing out the motions. | 00:22:17 | |
Let's make a decision today. | 00:22:24 | |
But I think that if you're going to do that, I think it needs to be fair and equal amongst all the districts. | 00:22:29 | |
Do I think that's overkill? Absolutely. | 00:22:36 | |
But I also. | 00:22:39 | |
Think it should be equal. | 00:22:41 | |
Any further discussion? | 00:22:48 | |
By show of hands on the two resolutions all in favor. | 00:22:51 | |
All opposed. | 00:22:55 | |
That motion fails. | 00:22:57 | |
I make a motion that we hear option 6 from Al. | 00:23:03 | |
All right. So we'll. | 00:23:07 | |
I don't need to be a motion formally about it, but I think we're. | 00:23:09 | |
Well. | 00:23:14 | |
You know, over a long weekend I tried to put together a compromise this this option 6 is not represent my first. | 00:23:18 | |
Choice and how we provide coverage, but I think it's our best option at this moment to ensure coverage for all of Floyd County. | 00:23:27 | |
Beginning June 1st when our current contract expires. So I sent this out Sunday giving everybody a little bit of time to look | 00:23:34 | |
through that, so. | 00:23:39 | |
This would be a seven month and two year contract. I stayed it that way just as a reminder that that first seven months is going | 00:23:45 | |
to allow us to true up the budget years. Somehow we got out of sync with regards to our budgets and our contract years. I'm sure | 00:23:51 | |
that was through probably just an extension with new Chapel at one point in time. | 00:23:58 | |
But for the first. | 00:24:06 | |
Seven months of that contract. | 00:24:08 | |
I'm recommending that we would employ option 2 with America Pro to cover the entire county with two ALS 24/7 units and one ALS | 00:24:11 | |
Quick response vehicle. | 00:24:16 | |
I think this would allow adequate time to further explore the possibility of a more comprehensive unified EMS system, whether that | 00:24:22 | |
end up being fire based, county based, outsourced. But it gives us time to get the task force together to actually explore those | 00:24:27 | |
options. | 00:24:32 | |
It also gives us more time to coordinate efforts with dispatch. Spoke with the sheriff about that earlier today. Whatever we do, | 00:24:38 | |
we need to make sure that we're on the exact same page on that. That gives time for training and and possibly even a new hire and | 00:24:44 | |
dispatch if they're going to be more anticipated call numbers on that adequate time for Highlander Fire to ramp up with regards to | 00:24:51 | |
personnel certification and training. | 00:24:57 | |
I think that option that we put together has. | 00:25:06 | |
Broad Buy In spoke with. | 00:25:10 | |
Board President Darrell Mills from New Omni Township Board President Michael Moody from Georgetown spoke with Chief Klein over the | 00:25:13 | |
weekend on this. | 00:25:17 | |
And everyone seemed to be accepting of the principles with regards to this. So for the first seven months, AMERIPRO would cover | 00:25:23 | |
with two ALS 24/7 units and one ALS quick response vehicle. Thereafter, 4 years two and three, 2025 and 26 respectively, we would | 00:25:30 | |
revert back to option 5 which was presented by Mr. Striegel. | 00:25:36 | |
One or two meetings ago, I can't recall now where Highlander Fire would take on their district. | 00:25:44 | |
And Ameripro would continue with coverage for those additional two years for New Albany Township and Georgetown Township and | 00:25:51 | |
Franklin Township. | 00:25:55 | |
For the stipends that I presented below. | 00:26:01 | |
Brad, you're correct. New Omni Township is kind of in transition itself and trying to decide how they're going to go forward with | 00:26:06 | |
not only EMS but Fire Protection first. | 00:26:11 | |
And Georgetown would need the time to assess whether or not they want to provide EMS service in the future as well. So. | 00:26:17 | |
You guys and your districts would have the coverage. It's my understanding that Franklin's also may be exploring a fire. | 00:26:25 | |
District itself I'm. That's rumor mill stuff. So but. | 00:26:31 | |
Or $78,083 a month for years two and three. The total, including the subsidy for Highlander Fire Protection and Ameripro, would be | 00:27:08 | |
115 to 580, three $0.33 per month, or $1,387,000 annually. | 00:27:16 | |
So it's two years and seven months of protection. | 00:27:26 | |
During that first seven months, Floyd County would actually. | 00:27:29 | |
We have more coverage than they've had under the new Chapel contractor because we would have full time 2 ambulances, full-time | 00:27:33 | |
chase car. | 00:27:37 | |
And some informal backup from Highlanders, they start to ramp up so. | 00:27:41 | |
That's it in a nutshell. I do want to speak further with regards to the task force, just because I didn't send this out in the | 00:27:49 | |
e-mail, but my intention would be for that to be formed and meet sometime in the first. | 00:27:54 | |
In June, I think within before the end of the summer, before the leaves start falling on the trees, we would know whether or not | 00:27:59 | |
we're going to get buying in cooperation from all of these departments or whether or not that's going to be practical or not. And | 00:28:06 | |
if it is, then I think we look forward to some way to purposefully long term fund that through an EMS LIT or other options that | 00:28:14 | |
have been discussed if it's apparent that it's not going to be practical to bring everybody together in the. | 00:28:21 | |
Long run that I think in the short term we might still want to entertain an EMS. | 00:28:29 | |
Local income tax will have its sunset at the end of 2027 and slowly start putting the onus on the fire district levees with | 00:28:34 | |
regards to funding the EMS. One other thing that Connie's point I. | 00:28:41 | |
I think it's imperative that we. | 00:28:49 | |
As we go down these roads, we do treat all the districts with fairness and if they do decide at some point in time that they're | 00:28:52 | |
going to take on EMS funding on their own, then I think they do deserve the equivalent of of the ambulances that were provided for | 00:28:58 | |
Highlander fire if they decide. | 00:29:04 | |
They don't want the ambulances then perhaps we should consider a cash stipend and the equivalent of that if they're going to be | 00:29:11 | |
outsourcing. But they need to be treated equally going forward. Thankfully. I mean, I think this, this compromise would give us | 00:29:16 | |
two years, seven months in order to get all of those ducks in a row for them. | 00:29:22 | |
There's also a provision that we talked about with regards to amending the fire district ordinances. | 00:29:29 | |
To allow for EMS services that are customary and the day-to-day duties of the Firehouse. | 00:29:35 | |
But also making sure that any financial obligations that they would incur would would be. | 00:29:41 | |
Overseen by the commissioners. And I think that should go into place sooner rather than later, Rick. And I've discussed possibly | 00:29:47 | |
being able to do that within the next 10 to 14 days. And I'd like for that to be all three districts at the same time, so that all | 00:29:54 | |
three districts are treated very fairly from this point forward in step with one another. | 00:30:00 | |
So. | 00:30:08 | |
Again, I think this is a true compromise because I'm not seeing anybody smile about it. That means not nobody got everything that | 00:30:10 | |
they wanted. | 00:30:13 | |
But. | 00:30:18 | |
I think this makes sense financially and again. | 00:30:19 | |
Absolutely would account for EMS service for everyone in the county. | 00:30:24 | |
For the next two years, seven months. | 00:30:29 | |
So. | 00:30:31 | |
Let me ask a question. Let me ask a question. | 00:30:36 | |
So the first year would be for seven months. | 00:30:40 | |
For seven months. | 00:30:43 | |
Seven months and Ameripro would be providing service for all of Floyd County except for New Albany. | 00:30:46 | |
Said, you know, is that correct? Except for the city of New Albany, correct? | 00:30:54 | |
And then we'll and then. | 00:30:57 | |
Year two or two and three? | 00:31:01 | |
Then that's when Highlander then would be they would be, they would they would assist in, is that correct? | 00:31:04 | |
For years 2025 and 26 you would have. | 00:31:10 | |
Ameripro providing service for New Albany Township, Georgetown Township, Franklin Township. Highlander would be taking care of | 00:31:16 | |
their district, but again, within this seven months coming up, it's my expectation that Ameripro would be signing formal aid | 00:31:24 | |
agreements with Highlander Fire to go into effect January 1. My hope would also be that we can get New Albany City to the table as | 00:31:32 | |
they're already run by Ameripro or contracted with Ameripro. My hope would be that Ameripro might help facilitate. | 00:31:40 | |
Negotiations between the city of New Albany and the county with regards to formal aid agreements. OK, so would there be some type | 00:31:48 | |
of a subsidy given to a Highlander because, you know, they've got the vehicles, the ambulances, they got the equipment? | 00:31:57 | |
But they need to staff up. | 00:32:05 | |
So how do they do that? Well, I think, I think 1 answer that would be the they got the vehicles that that is a huge part of their | 00:32:08 | |
stipend. I think there would be an expectation since they received those vehicles that they would be more than willing to give. | 00:32:15 | |
Some aid in an informal fashion to. | 00:32:22 | |
The rest of the county. | 00:32:26 | |
I'm not close minded to that possibility, but I would like for it to be data-driven. In other words, I would like for Chief Klein | 00:32:28 | |
or whomever to come before us and say these are the new hires that we have based upon these new responsibilities. This is the cost | 00:32:34 | |
of it and this is where we have a shortcoming with regards to our our current budget. So I'm not, I'm not close to that, but I | 00:32:39 | |
would like for it to be. | 00:32:45 | |
A line item data-driven proposal. | 00:32:53 | |
So I don't think we can just blindly say, yes, we're going to give you $15,000 a month through the rest of this year because we | 00:32:56 | |
really don't know where that money would be going. | 00:33:00 | |
OK, so there's a little bit of faith and trust. I understand that. I understand that. | 00:33:07 | |
But I guess my concern is that we're asking them to step up in 2024, but. | 00:33:13 | |
We're not giving them funds in order to do any hiring to staff up because I've heard criticism. | 00:33:20 | |
Here and from the public about, well, you know right now you've got three people and you respond to it was a ambulance call. So | 00:33:27 | |
you got two people in the ambulance, you only got one on the engine. You know, that's criticism that happens, happens in | 00:33:34 | |
Highlander, I believe it also happens in Georgetown as well whenever they respond with a brush truck. So I think there needs to be | 00:33:40 | |
some type of a stipend to help them to to staff up. | 00:33:47 | |
In 2024. | 00:33:54 | |
And again, I'm OK with that, but it has to be based on factual. | 00:33:56 | |
You know how much You know? This is who we've hired. This is what it costs. | 00:34:01 | |
And this is where our budget falls short of. | 00:34:05 | |
That need. | 00:34:09 | |
So again, I just, I don't think it makes sense to just grab a number and say, Oh no, no, I totally agree. I totally agree. But I | 00:34:13 | |
mean, is that something we can approach? Is that is that unreasonable? | 00:34:18 | |
Request I think. I think the date is there. Yeah, I have not seen it well. Let me explain. | 00:34:23 | |
When Highlander was asked to put something forth and they came forth with like an 802800 and 2000, that was for to run 2 analysis. | 00:34:32 | |
If they're going to. | 00:34:41 | |
Be a backup for seven months. | 00:34:43 | |
To Ameripro. | 00:34:48 | |
Then they would require one analyst which would be half of that 401. You can prorate that for seven months and that would be your | 00:34:52 | |
figure that's they've already done the numbers based on what they need to pay for billing and for call volume and everything | 00:34:59 | |
they've they've done that Ameripro was very clear in their their option that they are very confident that they can handle the | 00:35:06 | |
entire county on option 2 without any need for formal backup. | 00:35:13 | |
So. | 00:35:20 | |
Again, I don't know what informal backup would look like. My hope would be that it would be more collegial and and trying to get | 00:35:24 | |
again aid agreements in place I. | 00:35:29 | |
And I think it would have to be significantly less than just a prorate of one ambulance. | 00:35:35 | |
OK, there's. | 00:35:42 | |
Couple issues. | 00:35:44 | |
One option to being. | 00:35:45 | |
Advocated for is less than. | 00:35:48 | |
Contractionally less than what we have right now. | 00:35:51 | |
Which is a bit of an issue. And secondly, the option six. I don't see where it gets a highlighter anywhere in this scenario this | 00:35:55 | |
year at all. | 00:36:01 | |
And so I just, you know, I have a I have a real concern with that. | 00:36:10 | |
And this doesn't have any. I mean, I don't even know how you would go about putting this in writing it's, you know, I would | 00:36:16 | |
suggest a contract that it's binding, but. | 00:36:21 | |
You know, we've got to. | 00:36:27 | |
We're not even, we're not even there yet when it comes to. | 00:36:28 | |
Putting things in writing. | 00:36:31 | |
Top have a couple questions for you. Yeah, the 2 units on option 2 that was given by Ameripro, are those both paramedic units? | 00:36:35 | |
They listed them as two ALS units that were following the provisions of the RFP. Well, there were, and I'm sorry, go ahead. | 00:36:45 | |
That's and then and that quick, the quick response vehicle was also as defined in the RFP. Well, I only asked because originally | 00:36:53 | |
in the RFP they responded with three paramedic ambulances and a paramedic response car and then the other option option two was. | 00:37:01 | |
22 paramedic ambulances with a paramedic response car and if we have two paramedics ambulances, I'm not sure why we would need a | 00:37:10 | |
paramedic response card. | 00:37:13 | |
Secondly, I I'll just say I really don't think that this is enough ambulances to properly cover Floyd County. I mean if we look | 00:37:19 | |
back in 2017 when the original contract was written with a new Chapel EMS, they came back in 2019 and said you know we're getting | 00:37:27 | |
too many calls and not enough squads available. So they added the half ambulance for peak hours and that was before COVID and | 00:37:34 | |
everything else and we we still have an aging population. | 00:37:42 | |
Would you be more comfortable formally adding? | 00:38:16 | |
But the command who usually makes proposals like for operational plans never did so so. | 00:38:50 | |
And I have another concern with that, because I know didn't they just Max out their fire levy? | 00:39:00 | |
Recently. | 00:39:06 | |
Highlander. | 00:39:08 | |
He has permission. They ask permission to raise their levy or consider raising it. | 00:39:10 | |
But I don't believe that that. | 00:39:16 | |
Yeah, that they took an action to Max it out, but I do believe they also went into the State House and was able to recapture | 00:39:18 | |
$1,000,000 that they lost out on that they weren't going to get because of the consolidation. So I'm not sure what that's been | 00:39:23 | |
appropriated for, but that could be used as well. I mean they're offering to provide the service. So I do have a question on that | 00:39:28 | |
line of thinking. | 00:39:33 | |
I guess. | 00:39:39 | |
The way I'm processing it. | 00:39:42 | |
And correct me where I'm wrong. | 00:39:47 | |
You'd be OK with providing a stipend. | 00:39:49 | |
Or a subsidy to a for profit company like Ameripro? | 00:39:55 | |
But you're not OK with subsidizing? | 00:40:02 | |
Highlander I'm OK with subsidizing and contractual service. I'm not OK with subsidizing another taxing district. | 00:40:06 | |
That provides a service for us, OK, that receives tax money, yes, But they don't receive tax money primarily for this. | 00:40:14 | |
OK, so I. | 00:40:24 | |
Al, I guess the question I have. | 00:40:27 | |
Here is what? What is? What is the hesitation for option five? What is the main hang up? | 00:40:31 | |
I don't think Highway is going to be ready. I think that there and that during that quick transition we're going to have. | 00:40:37 | |
Service that would be less than what it would be seven months from now, once everybody's had a chance to get everything organized, | 00:40:50 | |
dispatch organized. | 00:40:55 | |
Backup plans organized. That is my main hesitation. And after a discussion again, I'm not gonna get into the particulars of a | 00:41:02 | |
private conversation. But. | 00:41:07 | |
My gut feeling was that the chief Klein was happy to have the extra time to organize as well. | 00:41:15 | |
I will say that there's another option here if. | 00:41:22 | |
That could satisfy Commissioner Sharp's concerns and yours as well, which is we could go with option one for the first seven | 00:41:26 | |
months. | 00:41:30 | |
Of that contract, Ameripro was very, very hesitant to do that during discussions because they were. | 00:41:34 | |
Afraid that they would not be able to hire a new crew for seven months only because they're going to hire somebody and say, hey, | 00:41:42 | |
your job may not be there in seven months, but I could ask them to look at that again. That would be a 100 and 27917 per month or | 00:41:48 | |
eight 95419 through the end of the year. | 00:41:53 | |
Um, but. | 00:42:01 | |
I'm also again willing to. | 00:42:04 | |
Listen to what? | 00:42:07 | |
Type of monthly stipend. | 00:42:10 | |
Factually in data, it looks like Highlander would need to run. | 00:42:13 | |
One unit. | 00:42:17 | |
But again I have. | 00:42:18 | |
I'd like for that to be more of a backup because again, I've got dispatch to worry about South. We're going out to one provider | 00:42:21 | |
rather than two during that time and I just think it gives everybody a chance to. | 00:42:26 | |
To succeed. | 00:42:34 | |
What if? | 00:42:36 | |
Yeah, in 2023. | 00:42:38 | |
How was Highlander performing? | 00:42:42 | |
They were doing back up to New Chapel. | 00:42:44 | |
Correct. | 00:42:47 | |
They were. They were. | 00:42:50 | |
They were responding to all emergencies in. | 00:42:55 | |
Health emergencies in. | 00:42:58 | |
Lafayette and Greenville. | 00:43:01 | |
Everyone. | 00:43:03 | |
How are they performing to find how do you want response times? | 00:43:07 | |
No, no, I'm trying to answer your question. | 00:43:11 | |
But in 2023, technically. | 00:43:15 | |
They were supposed to be back up for New Chapel. | 00:43:19 | |
It's not. That's not a fair statement. Yeah. No. So they were already going to cover and that's. I guess maybe that's where I'm | 00:43:21 | |
confused because I was under the impression that Highlander was just. | 00:43:27 | |
Doing their thing as a backup to who we contracted with, which was New Chapel at the time. | 00:43:34 | |
Not that they were taking the entire district for Highlander. | 00:43:43 | |
Well, for Highlander, Lafayette. | 00:43:48 | |
And Greenville were responding for emergency calls. | 00:43:51 | |
For Highlander, OK, every one of them. | 00:43:56 | |
Same way with Georgetown. | 00:43:59 | |
Georgetown responded to all the emergency calls for Georgetown. Is that is that right, Mr. Moody? | 00:44:01 | |
Yes, OK. So then my next statement would be. | 00:44:06 | |
They didn't get a stipend in 2023, but yet they were responding to all of their calls anyway. | 00:44:10 | |
They had. | 00:44:18 | |
827 dispatches. | 00:44:19 | |
And EMS transports to a hospital facility in 2023 was 30. | 00:44:22 | |
And they weren't getting a stipend from the county at that point. So they obviously have the money to do their area because that's | 00:44:31 | |
what they did last year. | 00:44:35 | |
And then for the first quarter 24, so far they've had 166 dispatches with 11 transports to a hospital. You said how many, how many | 00:44:40 | |
did they have in 2023 yet? | 00:44:46 | |
Dispatches were 827 for Highlander. For Highlander, yes, OK. | 00:44:53 | |
I dispute that. | 00:45:00 | |
And transports to a hospital facility was 30. | 00:45:01 | |
I cannot comment on that this came from. | 00:45:06 | |
Jeremy Klein and Orwell It was carbon copy to Jeremy Klein, but it looks like it came from Ryan Houchin. | 00:45:09 | |
Today. Today. | 00:45:17 | |
I haven't seen it. | 00:45:19 | |
I'm going by the data that was collected. | 00:45:21 | |
Into the last, the last St. the last nine months of 2022 and the first three months of 2023 which would have been a year even | 00:45:23 | |
though it's not starting calendar year. These are 23 and first quarter 24. | 00:45:31 | |
Can you say I'm sorry, you said how many? I'm looking at around 800. | 00:45:42 | |
And 58127 dispatches 30 transports for 23. | 00:45:46 | |
You had another. | 00:45:56 | |
So. | 00:46:00 | |
What if we? | 00:46:02 | |
Did a modification to five or six. It doesn't matter which one we're on at this point to get. | 00:46:05 | |
To. | 00:46:14 | |
Offer a stipend to Highlander. | 00:46:17 | |
To staff up because. | 00:46:19 | |
There if they were to provide EMS service. | 00:46:23 | |
Technically taken away from the fireside, which is not there. | 00:46:29 | |
They need to staff up in order to not. | 00:46:33 | |
Not take away from that. | 00:46:36 | |
They have been because they don't want to leave their people without service, so. | 00:46:38 | |
The number of transports is irrelevant to the extent that it's not a service that they should be doing alone, because it's the | 00:46:45 | |
county's responsibility to provide that service, and because that service has been inadequate. They are filling in the gaps on | 00:46:52 | |
their dime. And I'm glad they do, but it's not appropriate that they did that. They do that to the extent that we asked them to | 00:46:58 | |
continue that. | 00:47:04 | |
So I come back to Ali's point of not feeling like Highlander would be ready. What if we I? | 00:47:11 | |
Give us stipend this year for the next seven months, prorated off of the 401 to run a truck. | 00:47:21 | |
So that they in the event. | 00:47:28 | |
Not in the event when they became. | 00:47:31 | |
AOS certified. | 00:47:36 | |
Whether that's however many weeks or months down the line when they become. | 00:47:38 | |
ALS certified and check the boxes. | 00:47:43 | |
Then they become primary, but they. | 00:47:47 | |
Obviously, if option two is where we're going to go with the Maripro, option 2 will need some assistance because it's less | 00:47:49 | |
contractually than what we are what we have right now and Highlander would be that assistance. It's actually not less | 00:47:56 | |
contractually, I mean, because we have 2 1/2, but the half is not full time as far as I'm well here. Here's why I say it is. It's | 00:48:03 | |
2 1/2 contractually aimless with New Chapel. | 00:48:10 | |
We only have two and a fly car. On option two you can't transport with a family car. You don't. That's not an ambulance, but that | 00:48:17 | |
that half ambulance is, I believe not full time, is it? Is it a full time equivalent towards? | 00:48:24 | |
I'm talking about with new travel. It's seven days a week, 12 hours a day, I believe, yeah, but it's not full time. | 00:48:33 | |
It's but. | 00:48:41 | |
You have 2 1/2 or you have two. | 00:48:42 | |
What's less that's less by half truck. I'd also like to point out that one of the key differences between what we're asking from | 00:48:44 | |
Ameriprol and New Chapel is that and I still don't think it's enough ambulances, but that those trucks are dedicated for 911 calls | 00:48:52 | |
only from Ameripro where currently from New Chapel they can make other runs. But at the same time, you know I. | 00:48:59 | |
There's a yin and Yang with that. You know, because when you're paying for two ambulances, that's what you're gonna get. And if | 00:49:07 | |
they're tied up on a motor vehicle crash, I don't know when the next ambulance is coming, but. | 00:49:12 | |
And we do have contractual oversight that they'll actually be geographically within the county. That's correct. So that's that's | 00:49:19 | |
my point. I think we have more staffing with that. | 00:49:24 | |
So we have done the numbers with the two ambulances from Ameripro and and the in the chase car. | 00:49:30 | |
And this hyphen, which would be $230,000 to Highlander for the remainder of the seven lots. | 00:49:42 | |
OK. | 00:49:57 | |
So and and I believe if we can get the money from the legacy Foundation, it's completely doable. | 00:49:59 | |
I have a question. You said 230,000? | 00:50:11 | |
For seven months. | 00:50:15 | |
I'm coming up with one 16669. | 00:50:17 | |
And that's based on Brad's 200,000 for running just one truck. I'm sorry, that was you're right, I did the whole 400. So 116 is | 00:50:21 | |
right. Thank you. | 00:50:26 | |
For one truck I thought it was 400,000 for one truck based off of 802 for two trucks. | 00:50:33 | |
Let's get back to this. I don't think it's 200,000 for one truck, is it? | 00:50:43 | |
It's no, it's it's it's 401. But you have to prorate that out for seven months, right? She says 200,000 and prorated that. That's | 00:50:47 | |
where I'm trying to clarify. It's 400,000 prorated would be $233,333. | 00:50:54 | |
We would, we would have to prorate it out to 105,000. | 00:51:02 | |
Is what that would be. | 00:51:07 | |
For the rest of the year, I believe once I did that wrong. | 00:51:09 | |
401, well again to Alice point, we need to get to that number and it needs to be a hard number that is you know data-driven, but. | 00:51:12 | |
Also has to be carried forward for Georgetown and for New Albany Township. Maybe not in this year. | 00:51:22 | |
We need to have a Ledger going on for that. That has to be true up at some point in time or they pay it back or they pay it back. | 00:51:32 | |
Yeah. There's a reconciliation on that, some sort of record. Yeah, yeah. | 00:51:40 | |
But we realize we're not asking that of Ameripro. | 00:51:45 | |
But their reconciliation is not what we're asking for. Mayor Pro Maripro is a for profit company making money off of us even | 00:51:49 | |
though our tax dollars go into that contract. | 00:51:53 | |
And people have insurance, they have a higher rate. We're not reconciling with them, but we want to reconcile with with. | 00:51:58 | |
Highlighter or giving mine a Both, but only one has to be on the reconciliation. You're not giving money to Ameripro, you're | 00:52:04 | |
exchanging it for a service. It's not the same thing. You you When you buy a service, you also divest yourself of a lot of things. | 00:52:12 | |
When you don't have to hire, you don't have to retain, you don't have to purchase new equipment. Equipment that I've heard | 00:52:19 | |
described as an asset continues to deteriorate year after year after year. It has to be kept up. | 00:52:27 | |
Has to be replaced, so there are a lot of things that again, you don't have to deal with when you. | 00:52:35 | |
Sign a contract and outsource something. | 00:52:42 | |
I'm not saying one is all good and one is all bad. I'm just saying to say that it's all bad to have a contract with somebody I | 00:52:46 | |
don't think is fair. I didn't say that. | 00:52:50 | |
So I. | 00:52:55 | |
Again, we're going to have difficulty going forward now because we were down a member. I would like to make a motion. | 00:52:59 | |
I'd like to make a motion. | 00:53:04 | |
I'd like to make a motion that we move forward with option 6. | 00:53:06 | |
But that we do include Highlander as a backup. | 00:53:12 | |
To to to Ameripro even in year one. Not a primary but a backup and give some time to staff up. | 00:53:16 | |
To get their certifications I. | 00:53:26 | |
And and my motion also includes getting all of this in writing and writing in a in a binding. | 00:53:30 | |
In a binding contract for the three-year period, both with. | 00:53:40 | |
Ameripro and with. | 00:53:48 | |
And then? | 00:53:57 | |
At this point is that we move forward with option 6. | 00:54:33 | |
And that we. | 00:54:38 | |
Take a ask, ask for some. | 00:54:41 | |
Direction on numbers. | 00:54:45 | |
As far as this type in that they would need to be able to staff up to be the backup for the seven months. | 00:54:48 | |
But all of this has got to be put in writing, is my point. | 00:54:53 | |
So that's my motion. | 00:54:58 | |
And I guess I'm trying to give you direction and Tony had to leave. So I mean my point of order would be is that you now have six | 00:55:03 | |
rather than seven and whether or not you want to. | 00:55:07 | |
Yeah, have such emotion entertained tonight or not. | 00:55:13 | |
We probably should be. | 00:55:17 | |
Oh, we're in discussion. | 00:55:20 | |
Can I just vent? Actually, she has a motion. OK, there's no second. Do you want to just. I'll just. I'll just. | 00:55:22 | |
Yeah. | 00:55:31 | |
Can I just vent my frustration for a while? I think others for me. I'll speak for me. | 00:55:33 | |
This whole thing has, in my mind, has been driven by emotions and passion. | 00:55:39 | |
And. | 00:55:46 | |
The Mississippi Committee put out ARP. | 00:55:48 | |
Basically in my mind, with a poison pill for New Chapel that they really couldn't compete because of that pill of proving their | 00:55:53 | |
financial viability. | 00:55:59 | |
So therefore we we technically only had one bid, which is Maripro and at at the midnight hour Highlander fire comes in. And I | 00:56:06 | |
might add, not one person from administration that stood at that podium, not one. | 00:56:14 | |
And give us their presentation. | 00:56:25 | |
There's been others, but not one person from administration leadership of Island Fire stood at that podium. | 00:56:27 | |
And I just feel like this whole thing has been emotion and passion and not really data-driven and if whatever we do here because | 00:56:34 | |
of. | 00:56:38 | |
I'll call it the distraction and you all know what I'm talking about. It's going to cost the taxpayers of Floyd County on cost a | 00:56:43 | |
couple of $1,000,000 more in the next two years than we should have paid. | 00:56:48 | |
And that's just that's just my little rant for the night. | 00:56:54 | |
I'll just say that I'm I'm not driven by emotion. | 00:56:58 | |
At all here I'm driven totally by the numbers. | 00:57:02 | |
And I feel like I'm making. | 00:57:05 | |
Decisions based on absolutely. | 00:57:09 | |
Denise, I don't get an argument, but would you would you agree that you are biased toward Highlander fire? | 00:57:13 | |
You wouldn't agree with that? | 00:57:21 | |
OK. I would not agree with that. OK. | 00:57:23 | |
Al, I think we're close. | 00:57:28 | |
I do think we're close. I think that, I think that. | 00:57:31 | |
Biggest hang up if I am processing all this. | 00:57:34 | |
Correctly is that there is a hesitancy to. | 00:57:39 | |
Allow Highlander to. | 00:57:45 | |
Be a part of the primary solution come June 1st. | 00:57:47 | |
I'm trying to work a scenario where they become. | 00:57:52 | |
A part of a backup system. | 00:57:56 | |
To Ameripro until such time that they get all of the certification and staffing that they need to adequately provide. | 00:57:58 | |
Service primarily in their district. I'd like to see them not be restricted to operate EMS within their district and outside | 00:58:08 | |
through MO use and that sort of thing. Because Ameripro and Highlander are going to need each other. They need each other now, you | 00:58:14 | |
know there's many runs where Ameripro has used Highlander and vice versa, so they. | 00:58:21 | |
You know, they I'm looking for a scenario that I think we're really close that includes Highlander. | 00:58:28 | |
At some level and if we want to call it a backup for this year. | 00:58:35 | |
With what they need the stipend in order to or the subsidy in order to staff up. | 00:58:40 | |
That's not they don't. If they don't have that, they can't staff up. | 00:58:45 | |
Yeah. And I see the logic in that. It's just I need to have the data to tell me exactly what that is. I don't think just turning | 00:58:49 | |
over $33,000 or even a fraction of that. So it's going to be what the responsibility is, so. | 00:58:55 | |
Again. | 00:59:04 | |
What what works for me is the seven month, two year contract with Ameripro. We've got the seven months at some point during that | 00:59:06 | |
seven months. | 00:59:10 | |
When? | 00:59:15 | |
Highlander has their paperwork in order. At that point, then yes, a prorated stipend I think is reasonable. | 00:59:16 | |
But it's the chicken or the egg. I mean they need to have it in order to staff up. I don't think they need any extra funding in | 00:59:24 | |
order to get the certifications in order, right? I mean they they've already applied for those. I'm not sure about that in | 00:59:30 | |
particular, but they would need it to be a problem to be a backup service and a primary service they would need to staff up. And | 00:59:37 | |
so the the number that I heard was 12. So what I'd like to see is what to 12 new hires. | 00:59:43 | |
Cost over seven months to recruit, train and maintain over that seven months. That's what I think is the fair number. | 00:59:51 | |
I think that can be given to you in short order. | 00:59:59 | |
I'm sure that that can happen. | 01:00:03 | |
Just one last comment. | 01:00:05 | |
As far as Dale I, you know what? | 01:00:08 | |
Obviously appreciate your your, your take on it. I would say that Highlander is has was asked. | 01:00:10 | |
To put something forward. | 01:00:18 | |
They didn't come in at the 11th hour. They were asked to put something forth. Who asked? EMS Advisory Board. They asked them to | 01:00:19 | |
put something forward. So it wasn't like they came in to try to derail something. I guess my point would be at the time I left the | 01:00:27 | |
room and talked several people in the hall. If they were prepared to do RMP, they would have submitted the RFP. | 01:00:34 | |
And he did not cover the whole county. Fire was not interested in covering the whole. Why aren't they interested in covering | 01:00:43 | |
They're only covering Lafayette and Greenville, and that's what they're still. Why would that be? | 01:00:49 | |
A better solution than we probably ever had in this county as far as the number of ambulances that we are going to have to cover | 01:02:36 | |
the county. So I just want to say thank you and kudos to those people who have really done their homework met with the right | 01:02:44 | |
people to move this forward. And I feel like we have given some as well and I I agree, I think we're close. I think we need to get | 01:02:52 | |
some things in writing and. | 01:03:00 | |
I think we can maybe get this done that the next meeting out. | 01:03:09 | |
So, well, my only point of clarification to to your statement Dale would be that there was number intentional poison pill put into | 01:03:13 | |
the RFP process, but it was absolutely a call to anyone with a fire service that wanted to respond to that proposal, but. | 01:03:22 | |
I'm not going to in good conscience and a good steward of taxpayer money do business with somebody who can't prove financial | 01:03:32 | |
solvency. So and that was that was a situation that was unique to New Chapel. So that's I understand, but I. | 01:03:39 | |
And I've stated previously I took in private to people that. | 01:03:48 | |
There's nobody in this room that can guarantee that there are probably in business a year from now. | 01:03:52 | |
Because businesses come and go all the time, so that. | 01:03:57 | |
That metrics is not appropriate in my mind. Well because we can't guarantee a metro it's going to be a business. America Pro is | 01:04:01 | |
not currently being investigated by multiple. | 01:04:05 | |
Agencies, federal and state. So in any event, I think that's a little bit of an apple and an orange. | 01:04:13 | |
Again, I agree that we're close. Before asking for public comment, I would like to get us to secure. I just got one more question | 01:04:20 | |
is, is there an estimated? | 01:04:25 | |
Time frame that Highlander would stand on their own without a subsidy. | 01:04:31 | |
Do we have any like? | 01:04:35 | |
I think, I think my estimation on that is that. | 01:04:39 | |
You know the option that I put forward is. | 01:04:41 | |
A2 year, seven month deal for all parties involved. So it takes us through 2026. | 01:04:45 | |
And if we again have a task force that indicates that we're going to have a some sort of unified EMS county wide system. | 01:04:50 | |
Yeah, I think it's incumbent upon the people. | 01:04:57 | |
At this das to. | 01:05:01 | |
Find a funding source for that if it becomes apparent that. | 01:05:03 | |
Everyone wants to have home rule then, I think at the end of 2026. | 01:05:08 | |
All the districts need to be on notice that. | 01:05:13 | |
They might be expected to provide EMS service through their levees. | 01:05:16 | |
That would include Highlander. | 01:05:23 | |
I just have two more points. | 01:05:26 | |
By giving. | 01:05:29 | |
Highlander, a stipend. | 01:05:31 | |
If that's what you're going to call it for 24. | 01:05:33 | |
It really is option #5 with one less truck. | 01:05:36 | |
But also the half a ambulance that's quoted in their option 5. | 01:05:42 | |
Was only 10 hours for five days a week. | 01:05:48 | |
Not 12 hours for seven days a week. | 01:05:52 | |
So, umm. | 01:05:55 | |
Yeah, I think that number needs to be parsed out between. | 01:05:56 | |
You and Brad perhaps on that exactly what that would look like. | 01:06:01 | |
It's about 3 people that are coming at it from a slightly different angle, which is good. So to see exactly what that number would | 01:06:04 | |
look like and again, it's really again the the chief advantage to me on option 6 is we get that extra coverage for the entire | 01:06:12 | |
county. Ameripro would still be covering for, they would be the primary coverage for Highlander Fire Protection District during | 01:06:19 | |
the first seven months of transition, which again they weren't getting paid in 23 to be a backup. I just confused. | 01:06:26 | |
I think at that point in time, their point is that they weren't being asked to ramp up for Takeover. | 01:06:34 | |
Just one more thing for me, I will state I'm prepared right now to fund through December. | 01:06:44 | |
If that's what we want to do, option one or two. | 01:06:51 | |
Was that we talked about because that's him, That's the important thing right now because like the EMS tax that we're talking | 01:06:54 | |
about, that won't happen until later in the year anyway. But right now, 30 days from today or 31 days, 60% of the county don't | 01:06:59 | |
have any coverage. | 01:07:05 | |
Yeah, I think the and I appreciate that. I think the issue is that I don't think Ameripro is going to sign a seven month contract, | 01:07:12 | |
I understand that. So. So I think it's imperative that we set our next. | 01:07:17 | |
Meeting either Friday, Saturday or Monday. | 01:07:24 | |
Or Tuesday or Wednesday. | 01:07:31 | |
Hang and get down to this. | 01:07:33 | |
And I think we are close, I think option 6, but with the proviso of some sort of acceptable stipend based upon the math that's | 01:07:37 | |
going to come out of this, I think it needs to be looked at more thoroughly than just, you know, here at the table in the next 5 | 01:07:44 | |
minutes. Yeah, Al, I would just say that before we schedule the next meeting, I think there needs to be some movement on that. | 01:07:51 | |
Obviously, data that you requested from Highlander, as well as some amendments of ordinances that would allow Highlander to | 01:07:57 | |
operate EMSI think there were some legal. | 01:08:04 | |
I said we we had conversations on that today and we feel like that can be done. | 01:08:10 | |
So some short order, right, So some movement on that as well as the data and then maybe a revision just to six or two, five, | 01:08:15 | |
whatever option we are. I think those things as long as we have that data shared before the next meeting, I think it the next | 01:08:20 | |
meeting can be productive. But if we do, if we schedule a meeting like by Friday, I'm not sure that we'll come together before | 01:08:25 | |
then. All the weekends have been productive. | 01:08:30 | |
This is the penultimate meeting on this subject though, right? What I'm saying is I think we can get to a consensus to to actually | 01:08:38 | |
land the plane. | 01:08:42 | |
Meeting with. | 01:08:47 | |
We can look at next Wednesday, Thursday. We can do a week from Friday, but. | 01:08:48 | |
You know. | 01:08:56 | |
Ameripro is going to have to start moving assets into the area. | 01:08:59 | |
And again we keep saying 5 or 6 or whatever, but again the chief provision among six is that we have that seven month transition | 01:09:04 | |
period which again I think is imperative on this. | 01:09:09 | |
Rather than a 30 days and change. | 01:09:15 | |
So I don't know is everybody has their. | 01:09:18 | |
Their calendar before them, actually. | 01:09:22 | |
My one of my sons is graduating from Purdue next Friday, so I cannot do next Friday. Next Monday we have Baker Tilly. | 01:09:26 | |
Tuesday is Election Day. | 01:09:35 | |
I think Wednesday or Thursday is fine for me. I can make myself available. | 01:09:39 | |
Wednesday is better for me. Wednesday the 8th, What's the room situation look like on Wednesday? | 01:09:43 | |
And are we talking five o'clock 5:00 next Wednesday? | 01:09:54 | |
So 5:00 PM. | 01:10:05 | |
On the 8th and Mr. Fox and I will. | 01:10:09 | |
Show you what those the amendments look like or can look like at that point in time. | 01:10:13 | |
Mr. Striegel and this Moon, can you guys get together and do a little math? | 01:10:20 | |
And make sure that you guys are on the same page with regards to what that stipend should look like. | 01:10:26 | |
Sure, as far to the to the fire, to Highlander. | 01:10:32 | |
Yeah, we can share some information, you know, on that. And then again, I think the only thing we might be lacking consensus on is | 01:10:37 | |
when that stipend should should begin. | 01:10:41 | |
I think that would be an appropriate amount of data to answer that question. It would be the data provided by a Highlander. They'd | 01:10:47 | |
probably give an answer to that, OK. | 01:10:51 | |
So Wednesday the 8th at 5:00 PM. | 01:10:58 | |
I have one closing statement I'm going to make on behalf of someone in the audience. A young lady had to request in a minute. But | 01:11:04 | |
before that, do you have any public comment tonight? | 01:11:09 | |
Mister Man. | 01:11:15 | |
I'll say it again, I got more things to say than this. | 01:11:21 | |
Georgetown had the best system. We had no problems. It's all Highlander District in Greenville. It's always got this problem. | 01:11:26 | |
We had new camp. I'm not right on Newcastle. We had Maracro would still be good. Georgetown Fire Department is there first. | 01:11:34 | |
Then then America will be their second and they were the backup and they work fine for us. And I don't know what's wrong with your | 01:11:41 | |
all theory, but then another thing far based, we talk far based or private. I've been taught and everyone here has been taught | 01:11:46 | |
that so most of the time it's cheaper. | 01:11:52 | |
To go to private services. | 01:11:58 | |
Government service. It's always this. Prove me different. Y'all haven't never proved nothing. If we went far based all the way | 01:12:00 | |
through the county, how much would that cost us? | 01:12:05 | |
If every fire district had ambulance service in the county, what would be the final number? | 01:12:10 | |
That would cost a taxpayer. Nobody showed it to us. | 01:12:16 | |
We haven't seen the numbers of y'all bringing up here now and I've been almost all these meetings. | 01:12:19 | |
If it's run by the government, it's gonna cost the public tax first, more than private. You've been talking. | 01:12:24 | |
And this is the same thing. | 01:12:29 | |
We just want service in the customer's degree to our field contract. That's what we ought to be doing instead of fighting over | 01:12:31 | |
this right now and I'm getting talked to these meetings. | 01:12:36 | |
And I don't know you guys, you're working yourself to death. And they already agreed to do something. All you had to do was pay | 01:12:43 | |
for it. And you just show me. Show the public the numbers. If we had off our base DMS in our county, through each fire district, | 01:12:49 | |
how much would it cost? Would it be 100 cheaper than 105 million American pros offered us today? Thank you. | 01:12:56 | |
Thanks. | 01:13:04 | |
Seabrook's treasure. Two points. One, it was all my understanding, the commissioners about a contract and the council pays for it. | 01:13:09 | |
Very simple, whatever that was. Secondly, you're banking on. | 01:13:15 | |
$500,000 from Legacy Foundation. I'm one vote of five and if it if you're banking on that. | 01:13:23 | |
On those votes. | 01:13:32 | |
I want you to think about that because, again, I'm one vote. | 01:13:34 | |
Mission Ables one vote and Dale's one vote. We have two other votes. So think about that as you're putting all these numbers | 01:13:39 | |
together. | 01:13:43 | |
I I. | 01:13:55 | |
Tim Harson, Edward Field, Polina. | 01:14:01 | |
I've spent my life being a teacher, so I'm used to setting expectations higher than what I think will be achieved. That's what I | 01:14:05 | |
do in the classroom. But I'm going to sit that for y'all. Today. I was really dismayed. Couldn't make it. Last Tuesday my son was | 01:14:12 | |
in town. But Sunday when I watched your last meeting, I was dismayed that the gentleman from New Chapel was invited to the podium | 01:14:19 | |
and listened to your comments today. | 01:14:27 | |
And watching the division among you. | 01:14:34 | |
I think it's maybe time we talk about ethics a little bit. | 01:14:37 | |
Now, before Mr. Fox comes up here, we all know that ethical and legal are two different things, right? So. | 01:14:41 | |
Going to template like it is, is it ethical for anybody who received money or help in their campaign from Jamie Knowles or New | 01:14:50 | |
Chapel to be involved in this discussion at all? | 01:14:57 | |
100% agree with Miss Mayfield from last week. Ambulance service should not be political. | 01:15:04 | |
I know this is a lot to ask. | 01:15:12 | |
But I really do believe that if you're going to be an ethical politician. | 01:15:15 | |
And you got money or campaign help from those people. You should excuse yourself from this discussion and you should excuse | 01:15:20 | |
yourself from the vote just to add a little. | 01:15:27 | |
Ending to the FBI Indictments are not emotions and distractions. Thank you very much. | 01:15:36 | |
Any other public comment? | 01:15:45 | |
Closing comments from anyone. | 01:15:48 | |
Right. I just want to say something, you know, we look at. | 01:15:51 | |
What America Pro wants to charge us and all that, OK? | 01:15:56 | |
But I think what a lot of people forget is that. | 01:16:00 | |
You've got there's reimbursement for the for these transports. | 01:16:03 | |
And so that this is on top of that. | 01:16:08 | |
And we've reached, I've reached out to a gentleman who does building for quite a few counties and there's an estimated revenue of | 01:16:12 | |
1.5 million and this is based upon our demographics, it's a very conservative. So you got 1.5 million on top of whatever, whatever | 01:16:20 | |
we're paying that. So Danny, to to address your concern about stipends at some point in time, you know you look at the end of the | 01:16:27 | |
year, you look at what's what's being brought in from the, from the bill and the insurance. | 01:16:34 | |
And maybe a stipend is not needed. So at the end of the year we can always reconcile if, if. | 01:16:42 | |
If we give them, if we give them a stipend, we always, we can always reconcile that. But again, we all need to realize that | 01:16:47 | |
there's that there's billing from the, from the, from the ambulances for, for their compensation for, for making a transport and | 01:16:52 | |
responding. | 01:16:57 | |
Jim. | 01:17:05 | |
I'll just have to say there was a discussion by Dale about bias and I do think I do carry a bias for Highlander Fire District | 01:17:08 | |
because I live in Lafayette Township. I've seen the response times that they've had. They've been far better than what we're | 01:17:15 | |
getting for these public services. And then going back to the same point that John talks about. | 01:17:23 | |
Ameripro is going to charge double the rates for the same runs. | 01:17:31 | |
Is what Hollander Fire is going to charge, so there's going to be a lot of additional out of pocket expenses. | 01:17:35 | |
If we do that, so be his person and people within my district. I'm going to lookout for their best interest. So yeah, I definitely | 01:17:42 | |
am biased for Highlander Fire District. | 01:17:48 | |
Mr. Bagshaw, I'm done. You are expended. | 01:17:55 | |
All right. I just have a concern that. | 01:17:58 | |
At the end of the day. | 01:18:02 | |
If Highlander is going to do their district and we're going to get Georgetown and Newham Township up to par to do their own | 01:18:05 | |
districts, this is going to cost a whole lot of dollars out of the county. You're already at 500,000 for Georgetown and 500,000 | 01:18:13 | |
for New Albany to get 2 ambulances apiece. To be fair, then you're going to talk about a stipend on top of that. | 01:18:21 | |
To be fair. | 01:18:30 | |
And are they? | 01:18:33 | |
Gonna all have mutual aid contracts, and if so, are they gonna be able to talk to each other via radios, via whatever it is? | 01:18:35 | |
The communication is going to have to be there and I think bottom dollar is going to be. | 01:18:43 | |
Even more. | 01:18:49 | |
To run three different. | 01:18:52 | |
Departments. | 01:18:53 | |
Danny Yeah, I've got. I've got a. | 01:18:55 | |
Comment specifically, Mr. Harbison. | 01:18:58 | |
I I've been on this board for six years. | 01:19:02 | |
And I have never voted on a new Chapel contract. | 01:19:07 | |
It's been rolled over every time it's come up. | 01:19:11 | |
That's not even our function. | 01:19:15 | |
As the Council. | 01:19:18 | |
The commissioners do the contracts, we fund them. | 01:19:19 | |
The person that you're Speaking of. | 01:19:25 | |
Is divested and no longer a part of that organization. We're not even talking about that organization. They're not even an option | 01:19:29 | |
on our table right now. | 01:19:32 | |
We're talking about two entities here. | 01:19:38 | |
So for you to bring that up. | 01:19:40 | |
Is pretty far off base, especially when you could have dug just a little bit further to see the contributions of everybody sitting | 01:19:42 | |
up here and where they come from and and a lot of that would really open your eyes. | 01:19:48 | |
So. | 01:19:55 | |
Go one step further before you start pointing fingers and. | 01:19:56 | |
You'll see whose interest lies where. That's all I got. | 01:20:02 | |
It's sharp. | 01:20:06 | |
How many special meetings have we had at this point? | 01:20:10 | |
Today just it's a legitimate question. | 01:20:12 | |
How many special meetings have we had? | 01:20:17 | |
5-6 Too many, We are. | 01:20:19 | |
Right at the 30 day mark and. | 01:20:23 | |
I tell you, I feel bad for the people of this county sitting here and watching this right now it's it's just turned into a bit of | 01:20:27 | |
a debacle. But when we talk about ramping up fire districts and to provide EMS service, I think it's important for us to recognize | 01:20:33 | |
that we still have one Township that has no fire district at all and that would be Franklin Township. So we need to keep that in | 01:20:39 | |
mind. We don't want to leave those people out out there and. | 01:20:45 | |
I know for years I've heard John say, well they need to be cross trained. Well, are they gonna be cross trained or they're not | 01:21:34 | |
gonna be cross trained? That it'd be nice to ask these questions and be able to get it from the command staff. | 01:21:39 | |
And you know, ambulances have to come on offline, even brand new ambulances because recalls, you know, general maintenance | 01:22:20 | |
accidents happen, you name it. So just something to think about moving forward. | 01:22:27 | |
All right. Thank you. | 01:22:34 | |
Well, I think we've had. | 01:22:37 | |
As many special meetings as we've needed and we'll have as many as we need to get this done. We have two issues. We need coverage | 01:22:39 | |
for ambulances for everybody in the county on June 1st so that when someone calls 911 there will be a response. | 01:22:46 | |
Then we have a long term issue so that we prove ourselves a little bit more diligent than in the past when people just signed a | 01:22:54 | |
contract and walked away. We need a long term solution as well. | 01:22:58 | |
The nice thing about these meetings, as ugly as they can get sometimes to an observers that. | 01:23:04 | |
There's there are no backroom deals going on. I mean, everything is happening here in front of the public, which is I think the | 01:23:09 | |
beauty of the United States Constitution and the Indiana Constitution. We don't have executive power vested in one person. You | 01:23:16 | |
have it in three. You've got a legislative body that deserves input as well because everybody here represents hundreds, sometimes | 01:23:24 | |
thousands of people who voted to send the option. So it ain't always pretty, but it is what you get and. | 01:23:31 | |
The one thing that I won't impugn anybody up here is about their motive to try to do what's best for the people in the county. | 01:23:39 | |
That we live in and again I think we're close to getting settlement on what we're going to have not only for the short term but | 01:23:46 | |
also plan to get a longer term pathway. My name was invoked, I just want to you were invoked, my name was OK And then I've got one | 01:23:53 | |
further comment. OK, go ahead. No, no, go ahead. I just wanted to say in reference to the presentation, presentation that was put | 01:24:01 | |
forth that Jason was referring to that. | 01:24:08 | |
That we talked about some meetings back. | 01:24:16 | |
Was in reference to the presentation that the board from Highlander put put together and they signed the, the board signed that | 01:24:19 | |
presentation. It was given to the Mississippi advisor board and to the commissioners. I understand that some of the commissioners | 01:24:25 | |
didn't look at that. | 01:24:32 | |
And didn't look at that data. So it wasn't my presentation, it was a presentation that was given by the board. | 01:24:38 | |
And the board members have been to the Highlander board members been to most of these meetings. | 01:24:48 | |
So if there's a questions that we have. | 01:24:52 | |
Some of us that have and Jason if you have them, I would recommend that you go out and talk to chief client or some of the board | 01:24:55 | |
members you know as a commissioner I would hope that you would go out and talk to him to see what they could do and. | 01:25:01 | |
Not ignore the data that's been given, all right, We we could go on all night because we enjoy it so much. | 01:25:08 | |
Our county clerk is here and she would like for everybody to go vote. | 01:25:16 | |
So some of us here are up for reelection and the turn out has been low and. | 01:25:21 | |
Whether you believe it or not, politicians like high turnouts. So please go out and vote. I mean, it's, yeah, it's a nice | 01:25:28 | |
constitutional right, but if you don't use it, it's so all right, motion to adjourn. | 01:25:35 | |
Thank you. | 01:25:45 |
* you need to log in to manage your favorites
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
* use Ctrl+F (Cmd+F on Mac) to search in document
Loading...
Point of session of the Floyd County Commissioners and Council together, if you will, please silence your cell phones and stand to | 00:00:00 | |
join me in the Pledge of Allegiance. | 00:00:04 | |
I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God, | 00:00:10 | |
indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. We have one posted agenda item. I do have one special agenda item for the | 00:00:16 | |
commissioners that I'd like to take care of here at the beginning of this. It's unrelated to EMS. It's a carryover from our last | 00:00:23 | |
meeting with regards to the Southern Indiana transit system. If I can get a unanimous vote from the commissioners to add this to | 00:00:29 | |
our agenda. | 00:00:36 | |
So moved. | 00:00:43 | |
All in favor, aye, All right. And that is a carryover from our last meeting, which was resolution number for 2025 for ongoing | 00:00:44 | |
funding. | 00:00:49 | |
I'd like to get a motion to approve. | 00:00:56 | |
I get second on that. | 00:00:59 | |
I'll second that. All in favor. Aye? Aye. All opposed, Aye. | 00:01:02 | |
OK. So we have passage on that with two in favor and one opposed. And if you'd like to hang out until after the meeting, we can | 00:01:07 | |
get signatures for you on that. | 00:01:11 | |
All right. Thank you. Meeting to moving to the matter at hand with regards to EMS. | 00:01:16 | |
I'd like to just briefly start where we ended off, just to see if you had any headway on any of the funding mechanisms that we had | 00:01:23 | |
discussed previously. | 00:01:27 | |
I believe we did, but we do have two resolutions moving to the legacy foundation and also a letter of request that is in the works | 00:01:33 | |
on that. Does anyone want to summarize where we are on that? | 00:01:39 | |
Either the resolutions for funding or the letter on the. | 00:01:47 | |
Legacy foundation. | 00:01:51 | |
The resolutions have been drawn up. They're available. | 00:01:53 | |
Denise, were you in touch with the foundation? I have drawn up a letter requesting that the Legacy Foundation. | 00:01:59 | |
Look at giving us $500,000 of the 5% spend rate for 2024. And I can read that. I can also send it out. I wasn't ready to send it | 00:02:11 | |
out yet because I was waiting. | 00:02:19 | |
For Steve Barks to. | 00:02:27 | |
To verify some of the numbers, I think they're very directional. Is that fair to say, Steve? | 00:02:30 | |
And so I can read this, I can send it out. | 00:02:38 | |
If you don't mind, I'd like to read it if that's OK. | 00:02:42 | |
This is to the Floyd County Legacy Foundation Board. Dear Board members, 'cause I as I am sure most of you are aware, Floyd County | 00:02:48 | |
is currently addressing the situation with our current EMS provider. The contract for New Chapel expires on May 31st, 2024. The | 00:02:56 | |
cost to put a new plan in place. | 00:03:03 | |
To provide EMS service for all Floyd County. | 00:03:13 | |
Minus the city is substantially higher than has been paid in the past. The council and the commissioners would like to request | 00:03:17 | |
$500,000 from the 2024 spend rate, which is approximately 850,000. I think it's a little more than that, Steve, now that we've | 00:03:25 | |
looked at the numbers more closely, but I said approximately to support the unanticipated EMS expense for 2024. This would then | 00:03:32 | |
leave the commissioners and councils time to address. | 00:03:40 | |
A sustainable revenue source for the future. This would also leave the Floyd County Legacy Foundation with approximately 350,000 | 00:03:48 | |
to grant out to worthy, worthy applicants for 2024. | 00:03:55 | |
It might again, maybe a little bit more than that. The principal was a little bit more than I calculated. These numbers aren't. | 00:04:03 | |
We realize that this is highly unusual, a highly unusual request, and that you are currently in in the middle of your grant cycle, | 00:04:11 | |
but these funds would be go a long way to helping the county in an effort to cover the cost of EMS in 2024. | 00:04:19 | |
We do not want this to be an ongoing request, just a one time distribution of the spin rate only. | 00:04:29 | |
We realized the foundation was established to grant worthy applicants in Floyd County to make our county a better place to live, | 00:04:37 | |
work and play and was not meant to cover ongoing operating expenses in Floyd County. We appreciate your consideration to this | 00:04:44 | |
request and would appreciate if you would let us know your ability to grant this request by May 31st and I have left room for all | 00:04:52 | |
of us to sign this. | 00:04:59 | |
Or whoever is in agreement that this that we should move forward with this request from the legacy foundation. So that's what I | 00:05:07 | |
have in hand and I did talk with. | 00:05:14 | |
With Steve about it, so in verifying those, you feel like the numbers are perhaps in excess of that, yes to what, to what amount. | 00:05:23 | |
I did it based on 17,000,000 and the actual balance at this point is 17.8 million. | 00:05:30 | |
890 is what he said. | 00:05:40 | |
Yes. So you're right. Yes. So we would still request the 500 and they would have about 390,000 to give out instead of instead of | 00:05:45 | |
my letter of approximately 350. | 00:05:52 | |
So close. close to 400,000 to the grand out still. | 00:06:00 | |
So Steve, when is the next meeting of the Legacy Foundation? | 00:06:05 | |
We're waiting on for the Matrix come back from the. | 00:06:09 | |
From the Community Foundation to determine what the scale was. So you may. | 00:06:14 | |
I would shoot the middle of May. | 00:06:22 | |
But the request, as you know AL is around 900,000. | 00:06:25 | |
This year. | 00:06:30 | |
So that means that we have to go back. | 00:06:33 | |
We look at all that in our meeting as to what amount we give each organization. | 00:06:36 | |
Yeah, we're, yeah or you could just, we could just reduce by a certain percentage based upon what we what we have to give. But I'm | 00:06:43 | |
sure that we discussed on that. I'm going to suggest that based upon the outcome of of tonight's meeting wherever we go with that | 00:06:51 | |
that maybe we ask for a special meeting on that just to address this question. | 00:06:58 | |
I mean, Dale's also a member of that. Would you be opposed to that special meeting of the legacy foundation board? | 00:07:06 | |
I generally don't like it. | 00:07:13 | |
Just because I think it's setting a bad precedent. | 00:07:15 | |
That was as Denise. | 00:07:19 | |
Help in a resolution it was a certain intent was for that legacy foundation to be and now we're setting a precedent and my fear is | 00:07:21 | |
going forward it's going to be an ongoing thing year after year which was never the intent of the legacy. So I'm generally not in | 00:07:30 | |
favor I'm not saying I would noted but would you be opposed to moving and having a special meeting to discuss that with that. | 00:07:38 | |
So perhaps again depending on how we proceed. | 00:07:48 | |
OK. | 00:07:54 | |
Anything further on funding sources? | 00:07:55 | |
Well known or unknown well we do have the less less the rest of the contract. | 00:08:00 | |
That was budgeted 280, well, I think was budgeted 222-2220. So that's about $120,000 that could be applied seven months and should | 00:08:06 | |
be applied. And then we have river vote. Of course we have the what, the remnant of what? We don't know what the total number is | 00:08:12 | |
of Lois is going to return. | 00:08:19 | |
To the general fund that she. | 00:08:26 | |
That we addressed a couple meetings ago. Some of that gets about 150. I think I saw this interest walk in. I don't know if you | 00:08:30 | |
have any update numbers on. | 00:08:34 | |
And it was $368,000 total. | 00:08:40 | |
Should we have any idea what remains of that? | 00:08:46 | |
About 160 my calculation because. | 00:08:50 | |
Appropriated 190 for the sheriff for his project. | 00:08:53 | |
So that'd be about 160 left. | 00:09:00 | |
And again, those funds would not just be for. | 00:09:02 | |
The remainder of this year, but also might carry over to next year perhaps. | 00:09:06 | |
Or not? Is that a one time thing, Lois? | 00:09:11 | |
I mean, not not hers, but I'm talking about the money that you're adding up. With regards to that'd be 100 and change leftover | 00:09:14 | |
from the duration of this year's contract. | 00:09:19 | |
From Lois Riverboat, I don't know. | 00:09:25 | |
So that be I'm talking about the seven month period that that's at hand. Understood Cousin. | 00:09:28 | |
I think we're pretty much in agreement that we're going to have to. | 00:09:34 | |
Impose some kind of a EMS tax. | 00:09:38 | |
I think in order to sustain this whole EMS thing going forward. | 00:09:42 | |
So that's going to be a. | 00:09:46 | |
The pressing matter is getting funded through December 1, right? | 00:09:48 | |
And I think the if there is a. | 00:09:54 | |
EMS Lit. I think they're obviously that's going to be a very lengthy discussion with a lot of public input. | 00:09:57 | |
And we got about, does that have to be, I think it has to be done by October 31 in order to get the revenue for next year I think. | 00:10:02 | |
And I think part of that discussion needs to have a sunset built into that. | 00:10:11 | |
Depending on what the, depending on what how we go forward, but again just so if we don't come to terms on how we're going to | 00:10:16 | |
provide EMS long term that that would also sunset. | 00:10:22 | |
Over 500,000 that's 780 now and it's 780 you want for duration this year depends on on what route we go. | 00:10:34 | |
According to the the compromise that we're going to talk about tonight, the remaining seven months would be 546,581 June through | 00:10:44 | |
December. | 00:10:48 | |
So we're real close to that. | 00:10:54 | |
The funds available. | 00:10:56 | |
Do you agree, Jim? | 00:10:58 | |
I want to go ahead and make a motion. | 00:11:00 | |
I want to make a motion that the Council respect the authority of the Commissioners and, at the suggestion of the EMS Board, that | 00:11:06 | |
we approve funding for option one. | 00:11:11 | |
To be paid for 2024. | 00:11:17 | |
Via Riverboat 125 the recorders additional funds, which should be 126. | 00:11:21 | |
The current EMS budget, what's left should be 128,000. | 00:11:28 | |
That would leave 442 ask. | 00:11:33 | |
Of the. | 00:11:36 | |
Legacy foundation. | 00:11:38 | |
And then rainy day 74419 for the total of eight 95419 for the remainder of this year with discussion. | 00:11:40 | |
Along with the commissioners regarding broadband money and continued legacy funds for 2025 and 2026 plus other. | 00:11:51 | |
Grant monies and things like that that may be coming in to us. | 00:12:00 | |
Opioid funds, we might be getting some of those. | 00:12:03 | |
2nd. | 00:12:08 | |
Get your warehouse pain. | 00:12:15 | |
She made the motion. That's that's us. | 00:12:20 | |
Discussion on that, Yes, absolutely. | 00:12:23 | |
Doesn't look like that's the option that we were. | 00:12:30 | |
Coming into this meeting, expect an option 6. Going back to option one, I'm not really particularly fond of option one because it | 00:12:33 | |
totally eliminates Hollander Fire District in any kind of service. | 00:12:39 | |
So I'm not. I'm not in favor of that. | 00:12:47 | |
I tend to agree that the Commissioners came up with. | 00:12:54 | |
Option one, what? Three months ago? Two months ago? | 00:12:57 | |
And so therefore I would. | 00:13:01 | |
Be with Connie at that. It's a it's what the commissioners ask. It's our job to fund what they requested. | 00:13:06 | |
And. | 00:13:13 | |
So. | 00:13:17 | |
There we are. | 00:13:18 | |
There was just a lot in that motion. | 00:13:24 | |
Would you like to restate it? Yeah, if you would, Please. Absolutely. | 00:13:28 | |
Just the numbers or the whole thing? | 00:13:33 | |
I get the part about option one, that there was some other things that you listed there for some other funding sources that I | 00:13:37 | |
didn't. | 00:13:40 | |
I didn't care for 2024 riverboat funding should be 125,000 recorders. Additional funds, 126,000 should be left in there after we | 00:13:44 | |
paid the sheriff's. | 00:13:51 | |
The current EMS budget should be 128,000 left in that. | 00:13:59 | |
That would leave the ask of the legacy balance 442,000. | 00:14:05 | |
And then that would leave rainy day. We could use 74,419 for a total of 895 for 19. | 00:14:11 | |
What was that rainy day again? I'm sorry I missed it. | 00:14:19 | |
74419 Thank you. | 00:14:21 | |
Is there any further discussion or questions on on that motion? | 00:14:38 | |
Seeing none all in favor, say aye, Aye. | 00:14:44 | |
Any opposed? Can we show hands? | 00:14:47 | |
Show of hands for opposed, Tommy, what are you doing? | 00:14:50 | |
That motion fails. | 00:14:53 | |
I'll make a second motion. | 00:14:59 | |
That the Council respect the authority of the Commissioners and approve funding for option 2, which again is not enough | 00:15:01 | |
ambulances, but. | 00:15:04 | |
The total is 546,581 funding to come from Riverboat 125 recorders. | 00:15:09 | |
Balance of 126,000. | 00:15:18 | |
The current EMS budget. | 00:15:21 | |
128. | 00:15:24 | |
1000 that would put the legacy balance 75. | 00:15:27 | |
1581. | 00:15:34 | |
And. | 00:15:37 | |
Rainy day would be. | 00:15:44 | |
What, 16,000? | 00:15:54 | |
91,092 thousand. | 00:15:59 | |
2nd. | 00:16:02 | |
Have motion a second? Any discussion on option 2? | 00:16:03 | |
All in favor of show of hands. | 00:16:11 | |
Opposed. | 00:16:14 | |
Motion fails. | 00:16:15 | |
Can we get to the discussion of option 6? | 00:16:18 | |
I would also like to present to. | 00:16:23 | |
Resolutions. | 00:16:27 | |
To be identical to the Highlander resolution in 2023. | 00:16:30 | |
One for Georgetown Township at 500,000 and the second one to New Omni Township Fire District for 500,000 so that they can purchase | 00:16:34 | |
2 ambulances as well to get them equal to Highlander at this point. | 00:16:41 | |
2nd that motion. | 00:16:53 | |
Any discussion on that? | 00:16:56 | |
That money to come from CARES ACT money. | 00:16:57 | |
Because that's where Highlanders came from. | 00:17:00 | |
Seeing no discussion. | 00:17:09 | |
I know I'm not part of the vote on this. | 00:17:12 | |
It's two separate resolutions, one for Georgetown Montreal. | 00:17:15 | |
Amounts of $500,000 each. Purchase of maintenances for their. | 00:17:21 | |
For their districts. | 00:17:27 | |
I think Brad had something. | 00:17:30 | |
Did they? | 00:17:33 | |
So this is the purchase analysis for those two fire districts, is that right? | 00:17:36 | |
Yes. | 00:17:40 | |
Did they ask for analysis to be purchased for them? | 00:17:41 | |
No. But at last week's meeting, we said that we were going to get the Fire Districts up to an equal playing field, and in order to | 00:17:45 | |
do that, with Highlander having two ambulances, Georgetown should get 2. | 00:17:51 | |
As should New Omni Township. | 00:17:58 | |
Do they have currently have any amuses? | 00:18:00 | |
I'm not sure what that has to do with anything. | 00:18:03 | |
It takes a little while to get everybody up to speed and get those ambulances in. | 00:18:06 | |
But do they currently have any ambulances? | 00:18:09 | |
Again, not sure what that has to do with anything. | 00:18:12 | |
So do you know the answer to it? | 00:18:16 | |
I'm gonna say no. | 00:18:18 | |
Have they budgeted for any illnesses in the past? | 00:18:22 | |
They wouldn't need to because they weren't doing it, but if we're going to get everybody on the same playing field. | 00:18:28 | |
That's discussion to happen. So they have any transport numbers. | 00:18:34 | |
Come again? Do they have any transport numbers? | 00:18:38 | |
What do you mean? Do they have transport numbers? They don't even have ambulances yet. | 00:18:41 | |
But they will so that we can get them equal to higher. | 00:18:46 | |
Fire district. You know what level certification they have regarding being able to do EMS? OK, this I'm going to. By the time | 00:18:49 | |
they're purchased, they'll be up to par with Highlander. | 00:18:54 | |
We're gonna get them all equal. I have questions. I'm not sure why you're stopping the discussion. | 00:19:01 | |
Because are we going to talk about Highlanders certification level and where they're at and did they budget frameless? | 00:19:07 | |
I'm here for options. Would you like to vote on this or do you want to You want to keep talking about it? | 00:19:16 | |
If you've got some more discussion points, go right ahead. | 00:19:24 | |
I have questions but it don't seem to be either a any answers to them or obviously be you guys don't want to talk about it. | 00:19:27 | |
We'll talk about it. Go ahead with your questions. | 00:19:34 | |
It's OK to talk about it now and ask questions. | 00:19:37 | |
I have no further questions right now. | 00:19:43 | |
I was curious though. I think you're saying $500,000 each, but I think the. | 00:19:45 | |
When it was approved before it was 250 for Greenville, 250 for Lafayette, is that correct? I think that was right. So wouldn't it | 00:19:50 | |
be 250? | 00:19:54 | |
For New Albany, 250 for Georgetown, if we were going to propose such a thing, well, I thought about that. However, when they | 00:19:59 | |
merged, technically now they have 500,000 and two ambulances. | 00:20:05 | |
It's 2 districts. I mean, it's two townships though, that they're covering, not just one. | 00:20:12 | |
Probably not ready yet and and Georgetown we need to hear from them and I think that's in a I'm going to call it a 15 step process | 00:20:48 | |
here that's probably step you know five or six or eight we need, we're still at 1:00. So I think we need to get past one and work | 00:20:55 | |
into that for sure. But doing that right now I think is is. | 00:21:01 | |
Not about the appropriate course of action. | 00:21:09 | |
I'll just add to that. I think it was laid out very. | 00:21:14 | |
Clearly in option six that Al sent out that. | 00:21:19 | |
For the next seven months that we would be looking at how we are going to move forward and at that time I'm not opposed to looking | 00:21:24 | |
at that option if that is what the task force says that that's how we're going to move forward with with with providing ambulance | 00:21:31 | |
service in our county, but. | 00:21:38 | |
That that's, I think you took that way literally and doing that just immediately, that's something we need to be looking at on on | 00:21:46 | |
in the future, but not tonight. My concern is how long does it take to. | 00:21:53 | |
Get a contract to order ambulances and even have them delivered. That's a long time so to get them up to par. | 00:22:02 | |
It's going to take a while to do that. | 00:22:11 | |
But that needs to be part of the discussion. | 00:22:14 | |
And it needs to start sooner than later. We've been talking about EMS forever. That's why I'm throwing out the motions. | 00:22:17 | |
Let's make a decision today. | 00:22:24 | |
But I think that if you're going to do that, I think it needs to be fair and equal amongst all the districts. | 00:22:29 | |
Do I think that's overkill? Absolutely. | 00:22:36 | |
But I also. | 00:22:39 | |
Think it should be equal. | 00:22:41 | |
Any further discussion? | 00:22:48 | |
By show of hands on the two resolutions all in favor. | 00:22:51 | |
All opposed. | 00:22:55 | |
That motion fails. | 00:22:57 | |
I make a motion that we hear option 6 from Al. | 00:23:03 | |
All right. So we'll. | 00:23:07 | |
I don't need to be a motion formally about it, but I think we're. | 00:23:09 | |
Well. | 00:23:14 | |
You know, over a long weekend I tried to put together a compromise this this option 6 is not represent my first. | 00:23:18 | |
Choice and how we provide coverage, but I think it's our best option at this moment to ensure coverage for all of Floyd County. | 00:23:27 | |
Beginning June 1st when our current contract expires. So I sent this out Sunday giving everybody a little bit of time to look | 00:23:34 | |
through that, so. | 00:23:39 | |
This would be a seven month and two year contract. I stayed it that way just as a reminder that that first seven months is going | 00:23:45 | |
to allow us to true up the budget years. Somehow we got out of sync with regards to our budgets and our contract years. I'm sure | 00:23:51 | |
that was through probably just an extension with new Chapel at one point in time. | 00:23:58 | |
But for the first. | 00:24:06 | |
Seven months of that contract. | 00:24:08 | |
I'm recommending that we would employ option 2 with America Pro to cover the entire county with two ALS 24/7 units and one ALS | 00:24:11 | |
Quick response vehicle. | 00:24:16 | |
I think this would allow adequate time to further explore the possibility of a more comprehensive unified EMS system, whether that | 00:24:22 | |
end up being fire based, county based, outsourced. But it gives us time to get the task force together to actually explore those | 00:24:27 | |
options. | 00:24:32 | |
It also gives us more time to coordinate efforts with dispatch. Spoke with the sheriff about that earlier today. Whatever we do, | 00:24:38 | |
we need to make sure that we're on the exact same page on that. That gives time for training and and possibly even a new hire and | 00:24:44 | |
dispatch if they're going to be more anticipated call numbers on that adequate time for Highlander Fire to ramp up with regards to | 00:24:51 | |
personnel certification and training. | 00:24:57 | |
I think that option that we put together has. | 00:25:06 | |
Broad Buy In spoke with. | 00:25:10 | |
Board President Darrell Mills from New Omni Township Board President Michael Moody from Georgetown spoke with Chief Klein over the | 00:25:13 | |
weekend on this. | 00:25:17 | |
And everyone seemed to be accepting of the principles with regards to this. So for the first seven months, AMERIPRO would cover | 00:25:23 | |
with two ALS 24/7 units and one ALS quick response vehicle. Thereafter, 4 years two and three, 2025 and 26 respectively, we would | 00:25:30 | |
revert back to option 5 which was presented by Mr. Striegel. | 00:25:36 | |
One or two meetings ago, I can't recall now where Highlander Fire would take on their district. | 00:25:44 | |
And Ameripro would continue with coverage for those additional two years for New Albany Township and Georgetown Township and | 00:25:51 | |
Franklin Township. | 00:25:55 | |
For the stipends that I presented below. | 00:26:01 | |
Brad, you're correct. New Omni Township is kind of in transition itself and trying to decide how they're going to go forward with | 00:26:06 | |
not only EMS but Fire Protection first. | 00:26:11 | |
And Georgetown would need the time to assess whether or not they want to provide EMS service in the future as well. So. | 00:26:17 | |
You guys and your districts would have the coverage. It's my understanding that Franklin's also may be exploring a fire. | 00:26:25 | |
District itself I'm. That's rumor mill stuff. So but. | 00:26:31 | |
Or $78,083 a month for years two and three. The total, including the subsidy for Highlander Fire Protection and Ameripro, would be | 00:27:08 | |
115 to 580, three $0.33 per month, or $1,387,000 annually. | 00:27:16 | |
So it's two years and seven months of protection. | 00:27:26 | |
During that first seven months, Floyd County would actually. | 00:27:29 | |
We have more coverage than they've had under the new Chapel contractor because we would have full time 2 ambulances, full-time | 00:27:33 | |
chase car. | 00:27:37 | |
And some informal backup from Highlanders, they start to ramp up so. | 00:27:41 | |
That's it in a nutshell. I do want to speak further with regards to the task force, just because I didn't send this out in the | 00:27:49 | |
e-mail, but my intention would be for that to be formed and meet sometime in the first. | 00:27:54 | |
In June, I think within before the end of the summer, before the leaves start falling on the trees, we would know whether or not | 00:27:59 | |
we're going to get buying in cooperation from all of these departments or whether or not that's going to be practical or not. And | 00:28:06 | |
if it is, then I think we look forward to some way to purposefully long term fund that through an EMS LIT or other options that | 00:28:14 | |
have been discussed if it's apparent that it's not going to be practical to bring everybody together in the. | 00:28:21 | |
Long run that I think in the short term we might still want to entertain an EMS. | 00:28:29 | |
Local income tax will have its sunset at the end of 2027 and slowly start putting the onus on the fire district levees with | 00:28:34 | |
regards to funding the EMS. One other thing that Connie's point I. | 00:28:41 | |
I think it's imperative that we. | 00:28:49 | |
As we go down these roads, we do treat all the districts with fairness and if they do decide at some point in time that they're | 00:28:52 | |
going to take on EMS funding on their own, then I think they do deserve the equivalent of of the ambulances that were provided for | 00:28:58 | |
Highlander fire if they decide. | 00:29:04 | |
They don't want the ambulances then perhaps we should consider a cash stipend and the equivalent of that if they're going to be | 00:29:11 | |
outsourcing. But they need to be treated equally going forward. Thankfully. I mean, I think this, this compromise would give us | 00:29:16 | |
two years, seven months in order to get all of those ducks in a row for them. | 00:29:22 | |
There's also a provision that we talked about with regards to amending the fire district ordinances. | 00:29:29 | |
To allow for EMS services that are customary and the day-to-day duties of the Firehouse. | 00:29:35 | |
But also making sure that any financial obligations that they would incur would would be. | 00:29:41 | |
Overseen by the commissioners. And I think that should go into place sooner rather than later, Rick. And I've discussed possibly | 00:29:47 | |
being able to do that within the next 10 to 14 days. And I'd like for that to be all three districts at the same time, so that all | 00:29:54 | |
three districts are treated very fairly from this point forward in step with one another. | 00:30:00 | |
So. | 00:30:08 | |
Again, I think this is a true compromise because I'm not seeing anybody smile about it. That means not nobody got everything that | 00:30:10 | |
they wanted. | 00:30:13 | |
But. | 00:30:18 | |
I think this makes sense financially and again. | 00:30:19 | |
Absolutely would account for EMS service for everyone in the county. | 00:30:24 | |
For the next two years, seven months. | 00:30:29 | |
So. | 00:30:31 | |
Let me ask a question. Let me ask a question. | 00:30:36 | |
So the first year would be for seven months. | 00:30:40 | |
For seven months. | 00:30:43 | |
Seven months and Ameripro would be providing service for all of Floyd County except for New Albany. | 00:30:46 | |
Said, you know, is that correct? Except for the city of New Albany, correct? | 00:30:54 | |
And then we'll and then. | 00:30:57 | |
Year two or two and three? | 00:31:01 | |
Then that's when Highlander then would be they would be, they would they would assist in, is that correct? | 00:31:04 | |
For years 2025 and 26 you would have. | 00:31:10 | |
Ameripro providing service for New Albany Township, Georgetown Township, Franklin Township. Highlander would be taking care of | 00:31:16 | |
their district, but again, within this seven months coming up, it's my expectation that Ameripro would be signing formal aid | 00:31:24 | |
agreements with Highlander Fire to go into effect January 1. My hope would also be that we can get New Albany City to the table as | 00:31:32 | |
they're already run by Ameripro or contracted with Ameripro. My hope would be that Ameripro might help facilitate. | 00:31:40 | |
Negotiations between the city of New Albany and the county with regards to formal aid agreements. OK, so would there be some type | 00:31:48 | |
of a subsidy given to a Highlander because, you know, they've got the vehicles, the ambulances, they got the equipment? | 00:31:57 | |
But they need to staff up. | 00:32:05 | |
So how do they do that? Well, I think, I think 1 answer that would be the they got the vehicles that that is a huge part of their | 00:32:08 | |
stipend. I think there would be an expectation since they received those vehicles that they would be more than willing to give. | 00:32:15 | |
Some aid in an informal fashion to. | 00:32:22 | |
The rest of the county. | 00:32:26 | |
I'm not close minded to that possibility, but I would like for it to be data-driven. In other words, I would like for Chief Klein | 00:32:28 | |
or whomever to come before us and say these are the new hires that we have based upon these new responsibilities. This is the cost | 00:32:34 | |
of it and this is where we have a shortcoming with regards to our our current budget. So I'm not, I'm not close to that, but I | 00:32:39 | |
would like for it to be. | 00:32:45 | |
A line item data-driven proposal. | 00:32:53 | |
So I don't think we can just blindly say, yes, we're going to give you $15,000 a month through the rest of this year because we | 00:32:56 | |
really don't know where that money would be going. | 00:33:00 | |
OK, so there's a little bit of faith and trust. I understand that. I understand that. | 00:33:07 | |
But I guess my concern is that we're asking them to step up in 2024, but. | 00:33:13 | |
We're not giving them funds in order to do any hiring to staff up because I've heard criticism. | 00:33:20 | |
Here and from the public about, well, you know right now you've got three people and you respond to it was a ambulance call. So | 00:33:27 | |
you got two people in the ambulance, you only got one on the engine. You know, that's criticism that happens, happens in | 00:33:34 | |
Highlander, I believe it also happens in Georgetown as well whenever they respond with a brush truck. So I think there needs to be | 00:33:40 | |
some type of a stipend to help them to to staff up. | 00:33:47 | |
In 2024. | 00:33:54 | |
And again, I'm OK with that, but it has to be based on factual. | 00:33:56 | |
You know how much You know? This is who we've hired. This is what it costs. | 00:34:01 | |
And this is where our budget falls short of. | 00:34:05 | |
That need. | 00:34:09 | |
So again, I just, I don't think it makes sense to just grab a number and say, Oh no, no, I totally agree. I totally agree. But I | 00:34:13 | |
mean, is that something we can approach? Is that is that unreasonable? | 00:34:18 | |
Request I think. I think the date is there. Yeah, I have not seen it well. Let me explain. | 00:34:23 | |
When Highlander was asked to put something forth and they came forth with like an 802800 and 2000, that was for to run 2 analysis. | 00:34:32 | |
If they're going to. | 00:34:41 | |
Be a backup for seven months. | 00:34:43 | |
To Ameripro. | 00:34:48 | |
Then they would require one analyst which would be half of that 401. You can prorate that for seven months and that would be your | 00:34:52 | |
figure that's they've already done the numbers based on what they need to pay for billing and for call volume and everything | 00:34:59 | |
they've they've done that Ameripro was very clear in their their option that they are very confident that they can handle the | 00:35:06 | |
entire county on option 2 without any need for formal backup. | 00:35:13 | |
So. | 00:35:20 | |
Again, I don't know what informal backup would look like. My hope would be that it would be more collegial and and trying to get | 00:35:24 | |
again aid agreements in place I. | 00:35:29 | |
And I think it would have to be significantly less than just a prorate of one ambulance. | 00:35:35 | |
OK, there's. | 00:35:42 | |
Couple issues. | 00:35:44 | |
One option to being. | 00:35:45 | |
Advocated for is less than. | 00:35:48 | |
Contractionally less than what we have right now. | 00:35:51 | |
Which is a bit of an issue. And secondly, the option six. I don't see where it gets a highlighter anywhere in this scenario this | 00:35:55 | |
year at all. | 00:36:01 | |
And so I just, you know, I have a I have a real concern with that. | 00:36:10 | |
And this doesn't have any. I mean, I don't even know how you would go about putting this in writing it's, you know, I would | 00:36:16 | |
suggest a contract that it's binding, but. | 00:36:21 | |
You know, we've got to. | 00:36:27 | |
We're not even, we're not even there yet when it comes to. | 00:36:28 | |
Putting things in writing. | 00:36:31 | |
Top have a couple questions for you. Yeah, the 2 units on option 2 that was given by Ameripro, are those both paramedic units? | 00:36:35 | |
They listed them as two ALS units that were following the provisions of the RFP. Well, there were, and I'm sorry, go ahead. | 00:36:45 | |
That's and then and that quick, the quick response vehicle was also as defined in the RFP. Well, I only asked because originally | 00:36:53 | |
in the RFP they responded with three paramedic ambulances and a paramedic response car and then the other option option two was. | 00:37:01 | |
22 paramedic ambulances with a paramedic response car and if we have two paramedics ambulances, I'm not sure why we would need a | 00:37:10 | |
paramedic response card. | 00:37:13 | |
Secondly, I I'll just say I really don't think that this is enough ambulances to properly cover Floyd County. I mean if we look | 00:37:19 | |
back in 2017 when the original contract was written with a new Chapel EMS, they came back in 2019 and said you know we're getting | 00:37:27 | |
too many calls and not enough squads available. So they added the half ambulance for peak hours and that was before COVID and | 00:37:34 | |
everything else and we we still have an aging population. | 00:37:42 | |
Would you be more comfortable formally adding? | 00:38:16 | |
But the command who usually makes proposals like for operational plans never did so so. | 00:38:50 | |
And I have another concern with that, because I know didn't they just Max out their fire levy? | 00:39:00 | |
Recently. | 00:39:06 | |
Highlander. | 00:39:08 | |
He has permission. They ask permission to raise their levy or consider raising it. | 00:39:10 | |
But I don't believe that that. | 00:39:16 | |
Yeah, that they took an action to Max it out, but I do believe they also went into the State House and was able to recapture | 00:39:18 | |
$1,000,000 that they lost out on that they weren't going to get because of the consolidation. So I'm not sure what that's been | 00:39:23 | |
appropriated for, but that could be used as well. I mean they're offering to provide the service. So I do have a question on that | 00:39:28 | |
line of thinking. | 00:39:33 | |
I guess. | 00:39:39 | |
The way I'm processing it. | 00:39:42 | |
And correct me where I'm wrong. | 00:39:47 | |
You'd be OK with providing a stipend. | 00:39:49 | |
Or a subsidy to a for profit company like Ameripro? | 00:39:55 | |
But you're not OK with subsidizing? | 00:40:02 | |
Highlander I'm OK with subsidizing and contractual service. I'm not OK with subsidizing another taxing district. | 00:40:06 | |
That provides a service for us, OK, that receives tax money, yes, But they don't receive tax money primarily for this. | 00:40:14 | |
OK, so I. | 00:40:24 | |
Al, I guess the question I have. | 00:40:27 | |
Here is what? What is? What is the hesitation for option five? What is the main hang up? | 00:40:31 | |
I don't think Highway is going to be ready. I think that there and that during that quick transition we're going to have. | 00:40:37 | |
Service that would be less than what it would be seven months from now, once everybody's had a chance to get everything organized, | 00:40:50 | |
dispatch organized. | 00:40:55 | |
Backup plans organized. That is my main hesitation. And after a discussion again, I'm not gonna get into the particulars of a | 00:41:02 | |
private conversation. But. | 00:41:07 | |
My gut feeling was that the chief Klein was happy to have the extra time to organize as well. | 00:41:15 | |
I will say that there's another option here if. | 00:41:22 | |
That could satisfy Commissioner Sharp's concerns and yours as well, which is we could go with option one for the first seven | 00:41:26 | |
months. | 00:41:30 | |
Of that contract, Ameripro was very, very hesitant to do that during discussions because they were. | 00:41:34 | |
Afraid that they would not be able to hire a new crew for seven months only because they're going to hire somebody and say, hey, | 00:41:42 | |
your job may not be there in seven months, but I could ask them to look at that again. That would be a 100 and 27917 per month or | 00:41:48 | |
eight 95419 through the end of the year. | 00:41:53 | |
Um, but. | 00:42:01 | |
I'm also again willing to. | 00:42:04 | |
Listen to what? | 00:42:07 | |
Type of monthly stipend. | 00:42:10 | |
Factually in data, it looks like Highlander would need to run. | 00:42:13 | |
One unit. | 00:42:17 | |
But again I have. | 00:42:18 | |
I'd like for that to be more of a backup because again, I've got dispatch to worry about South. We're going out to one provider | 00:42:21 | |
rather than two during that time and I just think it gives everybody a chance to. | 00:42:26 | |
To succeed. | 00:42:34 | |
What if? | 00:42:36 | |
Yeah, in 2023. | 00:42:38 | |
How was Highlander performing? | 00:42:42 | |
They were doing back up to New Chapel. | 00:42:44 | |
Correct. | 00:42:47 | |
They were. They were. | 00:42:50 | |
They were responding to all emergencies in. | 00:42:55 | |
Health emergencies in. | 00:42:58 | |
Lafayette and Greenville. | 00:43:01 | |
Everyone. | 00:43:03 | |
How are they performing to find how do you want response times? | 00:43:07 | |
No, no, I'm trying to answer your question. | 00:43:11 | |
But in 2023, technically. | 00:43:15 | |
They were supposed to be back up for New Chapel. | 00:43:19 | |
It's not. That's not a fair statement. Yeah. No. So they were already going to cover and that's. I guess maybe that's where I'm | 00:43:21 | |
confused because I was under the impression that Highlander was just. | 00:43:27 | |
Doing their thing as a backup to who we contracted with, which was New Chapel at the time. | 00:43:34 | |
Not that they were taking the entire district for Highlander. | 00:43:43 | |
Well, for Highlander, Lafayette. | 00:43:48 | |
And Greenville were responding for emergency calls. | 00:43:51 | |
For Highlander, OK, every one of them. | 00:43:56 | |
Same way with Georgetown. | 00:43:59 | |
Georgetown responded to all the emergency calls for Georgetown. Is that is that right, Mr. Moody? | 00:44:01 | |
Yes, OK. So then my next statement would be. | 00:44:06 | |
They didn't get a stipend in 2023, but yet they were responding to all of their calls anyway. | 00:44:10 | |
They had. | 00:44:18 | |
827 dispatches. | 00:44:19 | |
And EMS transports to a hospital facility in 2023 was 30. | 00:44:22 | |
And they weren't getting a stipend from the county at that point. So they obviously have the money to do their area because that's | 00:44:31 | |
what they did last year. | 00:44:35 | |
And then for the first quarter 24, so far they've had 166 dispatches with 11 transports to a hospital. You said how many, how many | 00:44:40 | |
did they have in 2023 yet? | 00:44:46 | |
Dispatches were 827 for Highlander. For Highlander, yes, OK. | 00:44:53 | |
I dispute that. | 00:45:00 | |
And transports to a hospital facility was 30. | 00:45:01 | |
I cannot comment on that this came from. | 00:45:06 | |
Jeremy Klein and Orwell It was carbon copy to Jeremy Klein, but it looks like it came from Ryan Houchin. | 00:45:09 | |
Today. Today. | 00:45:17 | |
I haven't seen it. | 00:45:19 | |
I'm going by the data that was collected. | 00:45:21 | |
Into the last, the last St. the last nine months of 2022 and the first three months of 2023 which would have been a year even | 00:45:23 | |
though it's not starting calendar year. These are 23 and first quarter 24. | 00:45:31 | |
Can you say I'm sorry, you said how many? I'm looking at around 800. | 00:45:42 | |
And 58127 dispatches 30 transports for 23. | 00:45:46 | |
You had another. | 00:45:56 | |
So. | 00:46:00 | |
What if we? | 00:46:02 | |
Did a modification to five or six. It doesn't matter which one we're on at this point to get. | 00:46:05 | |
To. | 00:46:14 | |
Offer a stipend to Highlander. | 00:46:17 | |
To staff up because. | 00:46:19 | |
There if they were to provide EMS service. | 00:46:23 | |
Technically taken away from the fireside, which is not there. | 00:46:29 | |
They need to staff up in order to not. | 00:46:33 | |
Not take away from that. | 00:46:36 | |
They have been because they don't want to leave their people without service, so. | 00:46:38 | |
The number of transports is irrelevant to the extent that it's not a service that they should be doing alone, because it's the | 00:46:45 | |
county's responsibility to provide that service, and because that service has been inadequate. They are filling in the gaps on | 00:46:52 | |
their dime. And I'm glad they do, but it's not appropriate that they did that. They do that to the extent that we asked them to | 00:46:58 | |
continue that. | 00:47:04 | |
So I come back to Ali's point of not feeling like Highlander would be ready. What if we I? | 00:47:11 | |
Give us stipend this year for the next seven months, prorated off of the 401 to run a truck. | 00:47:21 | |
So that they in the event. | 00:47:28 | |
Not in the event when they became. | 00:47:31 | |
AOS certified. | 00:47:36 | |
Whether that's however many weeks or months down the line when they become. | 00:47:38 | |
ALS certified and check the boxes. | 00:47:43 | |
Then they become primary, but they. | 00:47:47 | |
Obviously, if option two is where we're going to go with the Maripro, option 2 will need some assistance because it's less | 00:47:49 | |
contractually than what we are what we have right now and Highlander would be that assistance. It's actually not less | 00:47:56 | |
contractually, I mean, because we have 2 1/2, but the half is not full time as far as I'm well here. Here's why I say it is. It's | 00:48:03 | |
2 1/2 contractually aimless with New Chapel. | 00:48:10 | |
We only have two and a fly car. On option two you can't transport with a family car. You don't. That's not an ambulance, but that | 00:48:17 | |
that half ambulance is, I believe not full time, is it? Is it a full time equivalent towards? | 00:48:24 | |
I'm talking about with new travel. It's seven days a week, 12 hours a day, I believe, yeah, but it's not full time. | 00:48:33 | |
It's but. | 00:48:41 | |
You have 2 1/2 or you have two. | 00:48:42 | |
What's less that's less by half truck. I'd also like to point out that one of the key differences between what we're asking from | 00:48:44 | |
Ameriprol and New Chapel is that and I still don't think it's enough ambulances, but that those trucks are dedicated for 911 calls | 00:48:52 | |
only from Ameripro where currently from New Chapel they can make other runs. But at the same time, you know I. | 00:48:59 | |
There's a yin and Yang with that. You know, because when you're paying for two ambulances, that's what you're gonna get. And if | 00:49:07 | |
they're tied up on a motor vehicle crash, I don't know when the next ambulance is coming, but. | 00:49:12 | |
And we do have contractual oversight that they'll actually be geographically within the county. That's correct. So that's that's | 00:49:19 | |
my point. I think we have more staffing with that. | 00:49:24 | |
So we have done the numbers with the two ambulances from Ameripro and and the in the chase car. | 00:49:30 | |
And this hyphen, which would be $230,000 to Highlander for the remainder of the seven lots. | 00:49:42 | |
OK. | 00:49:57 | |
So and and I believe if we can get the money from the legacy Foundation, it's completely doable. | 00:49:59 | |
I have a question. You said 230,000? | 00:50:11 | |
For seven months. | 00:50:15 | |
I'm coming up with one 16669. | 00:50:17 | |
And that's based on Brad's 200,000 for running just one truck. I'm sorry, that was you're right, I did the whole 400. So 116 is | 00:50:21 | |
right. Thank you. | 00:50:26 | |
For one truck I thought it was 400,000 for one truck based off of 802 for two trucks. | 00:50:33 | |
Let's get back to this. I don't think it's 200,000 for one truck, is it? | 00:50:43 | |
It's no, it's it's it's 401. But you have to prorate that out for seven months, right? She says 200,000 and prorated that. That's | 00:50:47 | |
where I'm trying to clarify. It's 400,000 prorated would be $233,333. | 00:50:54 | |
We would, we would have to prorate it out to 105,000. | 00:51:02 | |
Is what that would be. | 00:51:07 | |
For the rest of the year, I believe once I did that wrong. | 00:51:09 | |
401, well again to Alice point, we need to get to that number and it needs to be a hard number that is you know data-driven, but. | 00:51:12 | |
Also has to be carried forward for Georgetown and for New Albany Township. Maybe not in this year. | 00:51:22 | |
We need to have a Ledger going on for that. That has to be true up at some point in time or they pay it back or they pay it back. | 00:51:32 | |
Yeah. There's a reconciliation on that, some sort of record. Yeah, yeah. | 00:51:40 | |
But we realize we're not asking that of Ameripro. | 00:51:45 | |
But their reconciliation is not what we're asking for. Mayor Pro Maripro is a for profit company making money off of us even | 00:51:49 | |
though our tax dollars go into that contract. | 00:51:53 | |
And people have insurance, they have a higher rate. We're not reconciling with them, but we want to reconcile with with. | 00:51:58 | |
Highlighter or giving mine a Both, but only one has to be on the reconciliation. You're not giving money to Ameripro, you're | 00:52:04 | |
exchanging it for a service. It's not the same thing. You you When you buy a service, you also divest yourself of a lot of things. | 00:52:12 | |
When you don't have to hire, you don't have to retain, you don't have to purchase new equipment. Equipment that I've heard | 00:52:19 | |
described as an asset continues to deteriorate year after year after year. It has to be kept up. | 00:52:27 | |
Has to be replaced, so there are a lot of things that again, you don't have to deal with when you. | 00:52:35 | |
Sign a contract and outsource something. | 00:52:42 | |
I'm not saying one is all good and one is all bad. I'm just saying to say that it's all bad to have a contract with somebody I | 00:52:46 | |
don't think is fair. I didn't say that. | 00:52:50 | |
So I. | 00:52:55 | |
Again, we're going to have difficulty going forward now because we were down a member. I would like to make a motion. | 00:52:59 | |
I'd like to make a motion. | 00:53:04 | |
I'd like to make a motion that we move forward with option 6. | 00:53:06 | |
But that we do include Highlander as a backup. | 00:53:12 | |
To to to Ameripro even in year one. Not a primary but a backup and give some time to staff up. | 00:53:16 | |
To get their certifications I. | 00:53:26 | |
And and my motion also includes getting all of this in writing and writing in a in a binding. | 00:53:30 | |
In a binding contract for the three-year period, both with. | 00:53:40 | |
Ameripro and with. | 00:53:48 | |
And then? | 00:53:57 | |
At this point is that we move forward with option 6. | 00:54:33 | |
And that we. | 00:54:38 | |
Take a ask, ask for some. | 00:54:41 | |
Direction on numbers. | 00:54:45 | |
As far as this type in that they would need to be able to staff up to be the backup for the seven months. | 00:54:48 | |
But all of this has got to be put in writing, is my point. | 00:54:53 | |
So that's my motion. | 00:54:58 | |
And I guess I'm trying to give you direction and Tony had to leave. So I mean my point of order would be is that you now have six | 00:55:03 | |
rather than seven and whether or not you want to. | 00:55:07 | |
Yeah, have such emotion entertained tonight or not. | 00:55:13 | |
We probably should be. | 00:55:17 | |
Oh, we're in discussion. | 00:55:20 | |
Can I just vent? Actually, she has a motion. OK, there's no second. Do you want to just. I'll just. I'll just. | 00:55:22 | |
Yeah. | 00:55:31 | |
Can I just vent my frustration for a while? I think others for me. I'll speak for me. | 00:55:33 | |
This whole thing has, in my mind, has been driven by emotions and passion. | 00:55:39 | |
And. | 00:55:46 | |
The Mississippi Committee put out ARP. | 00:55:48 | |
Basically in my mind, with a poison pill for New Chapel that they really couldn't compete because of that pill of proving their | 00:55:53 | |
financial viability. | 00:55:59 | |
So therefore we we technically only had one bid, which is Maripro and at at the midnight hour Highlander fire comes in. And I | 00:56:06 | |
might add, not one person from administration that stood at that podium, not one. | 00:56:14 | |
And give us their presentation. | 00:56:25 | |
There's been others, but not one person from administration leadership of Island Fire stood at that podium. | 00:56:27 | |
And I just feel like this whole thing has been emotion and passion and not really data-driven and if whatever we do here because | 00:56:34 | |
of. | 00:56:38 | |
I'll call it the distraction and you all know what I'm talking about. It's going to cost the taxpayers of Floyd County on cost a | 00:56:43 | |
couple of $1,000,000 more in the next two years than we should have paid. | 00:56:48 | |
And that's just that's just my little rant for the night. | 00:56:54 | |
I'll just say that I'm I'm not driven by emotion. | 00:56:58 | |
At all here I'm driven totally by the numbers. | 00:57:02 | |
And I feel like I'm making. | 00:57:05 | |
Decisions based on absolutely. | 00:57:09 | |
Denise, I don't get an argument, but would you would you agree that you are biased toward Highlander fire? | 00:57:13 | |
You wouldn't agree with that? | 00:57:21 | |
OK. I would not agree with that. OK. | 00:57:23 | |
Al, I think we're close. | 00:57:28 | |
I do think we're close. I think that, I think that. | 00:57:31 | |
Biggest hang up if I am processing all this. | 00:57:34 | |
Correctly is that there is a hesitancy to. | 00:57:39 | |
Allow Highlander to. | 00:57:45 | |
Be a part of the primary solution come June 1st. | 00:57:47 | |
I'm trying to work a scenario where they become. | 00:57:52 | |
A part of a backup system. | 00:57:56 | |
To Ameripro until such time that they get all of the certification and staffing that they need to adequately provide. | 00:57:58 | |
Service primarily in their district. I'd like to see them not be restricted to operate EMS within their district and outside | 00:58:08 | |
through MO use and that sort of thing. Because Ameripro and Highlander are going to need each other. They need each other now, you | 00:58:14 | |
know there's many runs where Ameripro has used Highlander and vice versa, so they. | 00:58:21 | |
You know, they I'm looking for a scenario that I think we're really close that includes Highlander. | 00:58:28 | |
At some level and if we want to call it a backup for this year. | 00:58:35 | |
With what they need the stipend in order to or the subsidy in order to staff up. | 00:58:40 | |
That's not they don't. If they don't have that, they can't staff up. | 00:58:45 | |
Yeah. And I see the logic in that. It's just I need to have the data to tell me exactly what that is. I don't think just turning | 00:58:49 | |
over $33,000 or even a fraction of that. So it's going to be what the responsibility is, so. | 00:58:55 | |
Again. | 00:59:04 | |
What what works for me is the seven month, two year contract with Ameripro. We've got the seven months at some point during that | 00:59:06 | |
seven months. | 00:59:10 | |
When? | 00:59:15 | |
Highlander has their paperwork in order. At that point, then yes, a prorated stipend I think is reasonable. | 00:59:16 | |
But it's the chicken or the egg. I mean they need to have it in order to staff up. I don't think they need any extra funding in | 00:59:24 | |
order to get the certifications in order, right? I mean they they've already applied for those. I'm not sure about that in | 00:59:30 | |
particular, but they would need it to be a problem to be a backup service and a primary service they would need to staff up. And | 00:59:37 | |
so the the number that I heard was 12. So what I'd like to see is what to 12 new hires. | 00:59:43 | |
Cost over seven months to recruit, train and maintain over that seven months. That's what I think is the fair number. | 00:59:51 | |
I think that can be given to you in short order. | 00:59:59 | |
I'm sure that that can happen. | 01:00:03 | |
Just one last comment. | 01:00:05 | |
As far as Dale I, you know what? | 01:00:08 | |
Obviously appreciate your your, your take on it. I would say that Highlander is has was asked. | 01:00:10 | |
To put something forward. | 01:00:18 | |
They didn't come in at the 11th hour. They were asked to put something forth. Who asked? EMS Advisory Board. They asked them to | 01:00:19 | |
put something forward. So it wasn't like they came in to try to derail something. I guess my point would be at the time I left the | 01:00:27 | |
room and talked several people in the hall. If they were prepared to do RMP, they would have submitted the RFP. | 01:00:34 | |
And he did not cover the whole county. Fire was not interested in covering the whole. Why aren't they interested in covering | 01:00:43 | |
They're only covering Lafayette and Greenville, and that's what they're still. Why would that be? | 01:00:49 | |
A better solution than we probably ever had in this county as far as the number of ambulances that we are going to have to cover | 01:02:36 | |
the county. So I just want to say thank you and kudos to those people who have really done their homework met with the right | 01:02:44 | |
people to move this forward. And I feel like we have given some as well and I I agree, I think we're close. I think we need to get | 01:02:52 | |
some things in writing and. | 01:03:00 | |
I think we can maybe get this done that the next meeting out. | 01:03:09 | |
So, well, my only point of clarification to to your statement Dale would be that there was number intentional poison pill put into | 01:03:13 | |
the RFP process, but it was absolutely a call to anyone with a fire service that wanted to respond to that proposal, but. | 01:03:22 | |
I'm not going to in good conscience and a good steward of taxpayer money do business with somebody who can't prove financial | 01:03:32 | |
solvency. So and that was that was a situation that was unique to New Chapel. So that's I understand, but I. | 01:03:39 | |
And I've stated previously I took in private to people that. | 01:03:48 | |
There's nobody in this room that can guarantee that there are probably in business a year from now. | 01:03:52 | |
Because businesses come and go all the time, so that. | 01:03:57 | |
That metrics is not appropriate in my mind. Well because we can't guarantee a metro it's going to be a business. America Pro is | 01:04:01 | |
not currently being investigated by multiple. | 01:04:05 | |
Agencies, federal and state. So in any event, I think that's a little bit of an apple and an orange. | 01:04:13 | |
Again, I agree that we're close. Before asking for public comment, I would like to get us to secure. I just got one more question |